ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Implementation Science
The FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool: An evidence-informed pro-equity readiness assessment tool adapted in Aotearoa New Zealand for the implementation of health interventions
Nina Veenstra 1
Papillon Gustafson 1
Michelle Lambert 1
Lisa Kremer 1
Holly O'Loughlin 1
Karen Bartholomew 2
Peter Carswell 3
Mihi Ratima 4
Adam Fusheini 5
Patricia Priest 1
Sue Crengle 1
1. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
2. Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
3. Impact4Good, Auckland, New Zealand
4. Taumata Associates, Hāwera, New Zealand
5. University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Equitable implementation is an important dimension of effective implementation. In Aotearoa New Zealand, many health interventions with the potential to lessen health inequities for Māori fail to do so because of implementation challenges. Equity readiness can ensure organisations are both willing and able to implement or scale up health interventions in a way that doesn't result in further health disparities. Methods: An equity readiness assessment tool, designed to be used by healthcare organisations in conjunction with an equity focussed process framwork (FrEEIA: Framework for Effective and Equitable Implementation in Aotearoa), was developed through a seven stage, mixed methods, iterative process. This tool frames equity as a collective, multi-level construct. Initial stages of its development included interviews with interest holders to explore barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of interventions to improve health equity, a reveiw of existing equity assessment and change readiness tools, and a researcher workshop to develop key domains. This was followed by the actual development/adaptation of a suitable tool with advice from interest holders who had utilised similar tools, testing and the development of additional resources that would aid its use. Results and discussion: The final version of the FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is an adapted version of The Readiness Thinking Tool®, comprising 31 statements in three sections (individual readiness, intervention-specific readiness, and organisational readiness) which users rate individually and then discuss as a team, before formulating an action plan to improve equity readiness. Pilot testing highlighted the particular benefit of the tool in increasing awareness of the different dimensions of equity readiness, with the identification of strategies to address barriers to readiness more challenging due primarily to timing, team make up, and facilitation challenges. A range of supporting resources -a User Guide, Facilitator's Guide and Action Plan template-were developed to facilitate action plan development.The FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is now available for use and adaptation through an interactive online interface, a format which was found to carry distinct advantages for tailoring feedback. The research team will continue to make refinements as this tool gets rolled out in a wider variety of service settings.
Summary
Keywords
Aotearoa New Zealand6, Health equity1, implementation science2, Indigenous5, Māori4, Readiness Assessment3
Received
27 October 2025
Accepted
18 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Veenstra, Gustafson, Lambert, Kremer, O'Loughlin, Bartholomew, Carswell, Ratima, Fusheini, Priest and Crengle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sue Crengle
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.