Abstract
Since microorganisms play a major role in the biogeochemistry of the ocean, understanding structure and dynamics of natural microbial communities is crucial in assessing the impact of environmental changes on marine ecosystems. In order to identify key environmental drivers of microbial community structure in Chilean Patagonian fjords, we analyzed composition of the prokaryotic community over an annual cycle at a single sampling site in Puyuhuapi Fjord. Distinctive communities represented mainly by Actinomycetales, Rhodobacteraceae, Cryomorphaceae, and Flavobacteriaceae were associated with Estuarine Fresh Waters, whereas Cenarchaeaceae and Oceanospirillales were representative of Modified Sub Antarctic Waters present in the fjord. Salinity and oxygen were first-order factors explaining segregation of microbial communities in these contrasting water masses. Positive correlations of members of Flavobacteriaceae, Alteromonadales, and Verrucomicrobiales with diatoms in subsurface waters and of Flavobacteriales (Cryomorphaceae and Flavobacteriaceae), Rhodobacteraceae, and Pelagibacteraceae with dinoflagellates in surface waters suggest that phytoplankton composition could define specific niches for microorganisms in Puyuhuapi fjord waters. A dramatic reduction of richness and individual abundances within Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, and Cenarchaeaceae families was principally explained by seasonal increase of surface water temperature, with major reduction associated with changes in temperature during winter conditions. Taxa that are sensitive to increased temperature are key components of organic matter and element cycling, and we therefore suggest that potential decrease in diversity associated with rising of surface water temperature could impact current biogeochemical status of Patagonian fjord ecosystems.
Introduction
Since their transitional position between terrestrial environment and the open ocean, coastal ecosystems play a major role in biogeochemical cycles of elements and organic matter (Gattuso et al., ). Natural and human-induced climate change and human activity influence both the physics and chemistry of the coastal ocean, with consequences for the physiology and behavior of organisms, and the structure and functioning of ecosystems (e.g., Diaz and Rosenberg, ; Doney, ; Tyrrell, ). Microorganisms have rapid turnover times and play a major role in biogeochemical cycling of elements in the ocean (e.g., Azam, ; Arrigo, ; Falkowski et al., ), therefore community responses of microbes to climate variability could result in consequential effects on the biogeochemistry of the ocean.
The structure of microbial communities in the ocean displays vertical and horizontal patterns associated with variations in physicochemical and biological conditions (Giovannoni and Stingl, ; Zinger et al., ; Walsh et al., ) that can be modified by variations in environmental factors over a range of time scales (Fuhrman et al., , ; Smith et al., ; Giovannoni and Vergin, ; Ottesen et al., ). At seasonal scale, marine microorganisms display recurrent patterns of diversity driven by abiotic and biotic factors depending on specific environments (Fuhrman et al., , ; Bryant et al., ; Bunse and Pinhassi, ). In coastal ecotones, spatial variability of prokaryotic diversity can be driven by salinity variations (Herlemann et al., ; Campbell and Kirchman, ; Fortunato and Crump, ), whereas temporal variations in community structure appear to be related to seasonal changes of temperature, day length, nutrient concentrations, and river flow (Andersson et al., ; Gilbert et al., ; Fortunato et al., ; El-Swais et al., ). In addition, phytoplankton dynamics can also be an important factor explaining seasonal variability of prokaryotic communities (Pinhassi and Hagstrƶm, ; Gilbert et al., ; Chow et al., ; El-Swais et al., ). In fjord waters, spatial (across channel) and seasonal variations in microbial community composition have been linked to availability of nutrients (Storesund et al., ) and, in glacial fjords to variation in melt water discharge (Piquet et al., ; Zeng et al., ; GutiƩrrez et al., ).
The Patagonian fjord ecosystem is one of the world's largest estuarine environments. This ecosystem is greatly influenced by rivers and the Patagonian Ice Fields (Pickard, ) and supports high rates of biological productivity and vertical export fluxes of carbon (Pantoja et al., ; GonzÔlez et al., , , ; Montero et al., , ,). The Patagonian fjord ecosystem as a whole is considered to represent a net sink of CO2 (Torres et al., ; GonzÔlez et al., ) and of enhanced sedimentary burial of organic carbon (Sepúlveda et al., ; Smith et al., ). Previous studies within this coastal ecosystem have highlighted the role of winds, low-pressure systems, and freshwater discharge in driving cycles of biological productivity and composition of the phytoplankton community at seasonal and shorter time scales (Montero et al., , ,). Changes in the composition of microbial communities have also been related to seasonal variations in glacial melting (Gutiérrez et al., ). Over longer time scales, there is a challenge to connect variability in microbial community structure to climatic variability, such as the trends already detected in Patagonia in precipitation (Quintana and Aceituno, ), drying (Garreaud et al., ), fresh water discharge (Iriarte et al., ), and sea surface temperature (Lara et al., ).
Here we studied potential environmental drivers of microbial community structure by investigating temporal variability in diversity of prokaryotes in relation to physical and chemical properties of waters of the Puyuhuapi Fjord. Our results bring valuable information on key-modulating environmental factors of the structure of microbial communities, their utility as predictors of microbial diversity and the potential effect on functioning of fjord ecosystems under climatic changes expected for Chilean Patagonia.
Materials and methods
Study area and sampling
Sampling was carried out in the central-northern section of the Puyuhuapi Fjord (Figure 1A), at a single sampling site where an oceanographic buoy equipped with a YSI 6600 V2-4 multiparameter probe has been continuously recording meteorological and hydrographic data since 20101 Puyuhuapi Fjord is ca. 90 km in length, situated between 44° 19ā² and 44° 57ā² S in Chilean Patagonia, and connected with the coastal ocean through the Jacaf and Moraleda channels to the north and south respectively (Figure 1A). The fjord is characterized by a complex bathymetry, with maximum depths of ca. 400 m and the presence of several sills that restrict the exchange of waters between inner basins and adjacent channels (Figure 1A). Puyuhuapi Fjord receives freshwater from the discharges of the Cisnes and Ventisquero rivers (annual average of 218 and 40 mā3 sā1, respectively; Calvete and Sobarzo, ), combined with direct precipitation (ā„2,000 mm per year), runoff, ice, and snow melting and input of minor rivers and streams. The water column of Puyuhuapi Fjord shows a seasonal stratification/mixing cycle varying from highly stratified during spring and summer to partially mixed in winter (Schneider et al., ).
Figure 1
Water samples were collected monthly from June 2013 to September 2014 using Niskin bottles deployed from a boat, both from near surface water (2 m) and from 20 m depth (Table 1). Additionally, in July 2015 the water column was sampled every second day over 7 days at 5 standard depths between 1 and 100 m (Table 1). Water samples were stored in the dark at in situ temperature in acid-cleaned containers prior to processing. Hydrographic data were recorded during the 2013-2014 period using a CTD Ocean Seven 304 (IDRONAUT, Italy) and in winter 2015 using a CTD SeaBird 25. Oxygen concentrations in surface and subsurface waters were determined using the Winkler method (Strickland and Parsons,
Table 1
| Date | Depth (m) | Sample ID | Nitrate (μM) | Phosphate (μM) | Silicic acid (μM) | Chlorophyll-a (μg Lā1) | Ammonia (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Jun-13 | 2 | Jun.13.2m | 2.21 | 0.77 | 19.03 | 9.07 | 0.64 |
| 6-Jul-13 | 2 | Jul.13.2m | 19.26 | 1.07 | 110.36 | 0.94 | 0.67 |
| 8-Aug-13 | 2 | Aug.13.2m | 1.45 | 0.11 | 4.94 | 26.21 | 0.69 |
| 28-Sep-13 | 2 | Sep.13.2m | 8.67 | 0.68 | 10.63 | 1.83 | 0.83 |
| 29-Oct-13 | 2 | Oct.13.2m | 1.37 | 0.9 | 9.85 | 1.29 | 1.22 |
| 24-Nov-13 | 2 | Nov.13.2m | 3.64 | 0.19 | 9.26 | 1.68 | 1.54 |
| 18-Dec-13 | 2 | Dec.13.2m | 0.63 | 0.09 | 2.59 | 1.29 | 1.32 |
| 22-Jan-14 | 2 | Jan.14.2m | 0.62 | 0.15 | 9.52 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 5-Mar-14 | 2 | Mar.14.2m | 0.87 | 0.03 | 7.81 | 1.13 | 0.31 |
| 28-Apr-14 | 2 | Apr.14.2m | 0.97 | 0.44 | 19.42 | 10.36 | 0.51 |
| 13-May-14 | 2 | May.14.2m | 0.11 | 0.5 | 5.8 | 4.57 | 0.58 |
| 17-Jun-14 | 2 | Jun.14.2m | 12.77 | 2.39 | 26.18 | 0.33 | 0.51 |
| 9-Jul-14 | 2 | Jul.14.2m | 13.69 | 1.66 | 20.02 | 1.26 | 0.61 |
| 13-Aug-14 | 2 | Aug.13.14.2m | 8.39 | 0.57 | 11.73 | 1.28 | 0.34 |
| 10-Sep-14 | 2 | Sep.10.14.2m | 0.16 | 0.38 | 13.71 | 15.75 | 0.47 |
| 10-Jul-15 | 1 | Jul.10.15.1m | 3.83 | 0.13 | 37.92 | 10.96 | 0.29 |
| 12-Jul-15 | 2 | Jul.12.15.2m | 1.1 | 0 | 49.81 | 28.48 | 0.24 |
| 14-Jul-15 | 2 | Jul.14.15.2m | 1.29 | 0.06 | 64.97 | 9.51 | 0.46 |
| 16-Jul-15 | 2 | Jul.16.15.2m | 2.89 | 0.19 | 70.57 | 3.54 | 0.36 |
| 10-Jul-15 | 5 | Jul.10.15.5m | 9.99 | 0.13 | 32.67 | 6.69 | 0.19 |
| 12-Jul-15 | 5 | Jul.12.15.5m | 3.95 | 0.13 | 48.95 | 5.05 | 0.29 |
| 14-Jul-15 | 5 | Jul.14.15.5m | 3.08 | 0.23 | 55.75 | 14.61 | 0.35 |
| 16-Jul-15 | 5 | Jul.16.15.5m | 6.07 | 0.18 | 43 | 6.67 | 0.4 |
| 1-Jun-13 | 20 | Jun.13.20m | 6.36 | 1.3 | 10.48 | 0.18 | 0.4 |
| 6-Jul-13 | 20 | Jul.13.20m | 16.75 | 4.27 | 118.22 | 0.08 | 0.45 |
| 8-Aug-13 | 20 | Aug.13.20m | 15.4 | 1.4 | 15.93 | 7.03 | 0.53 |
| 28-Sep-13 | 20 | Sep.13.20m | 20.34 | 1.64 | 70.68 | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| 29-Oct-13 | 20 | Oct.13.20m | 15.98 | 1.64 | 12.99 | 0.65 | 0.61 |
| 24-Nov-13 | 20 | Nov.13.20m | 8.85 | 1.09 | 9.95 | 1.34 | 0.31 |
| 18-Dec-13 | 20 | Dec.13.20m | 19.19 | 1.89 | 66.75 | 0.81 | 0.99 |
| 22-Jan-14 | 20 | Jan.14.20m | 2.82 | 1.71 | 12.46 | 1.12 | 0.71 |
| 5-Mar-14 | 20 | Mar.14.20m | 16.86 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 1.07 | 0.45 |
| 28-Apr-14 | 20 | Apr.14.20m | 18.42 | 2.36 | 9.68 | 1.89 | 0.42 |
| 13-May-14 | 20 | May.14.20m | 10.1 | 1.94 | 12.45 | 0.43 | 0.6 |
| 17-Jun-14 | 20 | Jun.14.20m | 17.44 | 1.86 | 10.9 | 1.66 | 0.84 |
| 9-Jul-14 | 20 | Jul.14.20m | 19.95 | 2.41 | 13.3 | 0.48 | 0.52 |
| 13-Aug-14 | 20 | Aug.13.14.20m | 18.11 | 1.37 | 3.47 | 0.35 | 0.28 |
| 10-Sep-14 | 8 | Sep.10.14.8m | 13.41 | 2.13 | 17.54 | 8.76 | 0.39 |
| 10-Jul-15 | 15 | Jul.10.15.15m | 15.81 | 0.62 | 22.5 | 1.67 | 0.31 |
| 12-Jul-15 | 15 | Jul.12.15.15m | 8.48 | 0.61 | 36.46 | 1.71 | 0.33 |
| 14-Jul-15 | 15 | Jul.14.15.15m | 11.21 | 0.81 | 33.7 | 14.21 | 0.23 |
| 16-Jul-15 | 15 | Jul.16.15.15m | 14.11 | 0.86 | 31.55 | 2.85 | 0.25 |
| 10-Jul-15 | 50 | Jul.10.15.50m | 15.69 | 1.14 | 19.31 | 1.4 | 0.32 |
| 12-Jul-15 | 50 | Jul.12.15.50m | 9 | 1.08 | 26.55 | 1.26 | 0.34 |
| 14-Jul-15 | 50 | Jul.14.15.50m | 13.4 | 1.79 | 18.8 | 1.48 | 0.29 |
| 16-Jul-15 | 50 | Jul.16.15.50m | 13.83 | 1.06 | 27.5 | 1.44 | 0.3 |
| 10-Jul-15 | 100 | Jul.10.15.100m | 9.37 | 0.93 | 29.56 | 0.75 | 0.34 |
| 12-Jul-15 | 100 | Jul.12.15.100m | 12.98 | 1.03 | 49.64 | 0.9 | 0.32 |
| 14-Jul-15 | 100 | Jul.14.15.100m | 20.45 | 1.39 | 27.58 | 1.14 | 0.29 |
| 16-Jul-15 | 100 | Jul.16.15.100m | 2.84 | 0.29 | 63.94 | 3.62 | 0.27 |
Sample ID and chemical and biological characteristics of the waters sampled between June 2013 and September 2014, and during July 2015, at the Boya Puyuhuapi site in Puyuhuapi Fjord.
Within 4 h after collection, 1 L aliquots of water samples from the Niskin bottles were filtered through 0.22 μm sterile membrane filters (Millipore) and stored at ā20°C prior to processing for DNA analysis. Samples for determination of chlorophyll-a and inorganic nutrients were collected by filtration of 1 L seawater through pre-combusted (4 h at 450°C) 0.7 μm glass fiber filters (Whatman GF/F). Chlorophyll-a was analyzed using the fluorometric method of Parsons et al. (
DNA extraction and sequencing
DNA on filters was extracted using a PowerWaterĀ® DNA Isolation Kit and cleaned using a Power CleanĀ® DNA Clean-up Kit (MOBIO Laboratories). Prokaryotic (Bacteria plus Archaea) 16S rRNA genes were amplified using primer set 515F (5ā²-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3ā²) and 806R (5ā²-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3ā²). Amplification and sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq platform were conducted in a commercial laboratory (Research and Testing Laboratory, Lubbock, TX, USA).
Sequence data processing
The full MiqSeq data set is available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR5155509 to SRR5155558. Paired Illumina reads were processed using QIIME software package version 1.9.1 (Caporaso et al.,
Analysis of beta and alpha diversity (Chao1) was carried out after removal of sequences identified as Chloroplast and after resampling with the rarefaction method using the minimum number of sequences per sample (13036). Similarity was estimated at the OTU level based on the Bray-Curtis distance matrix index and then used as input to carry out Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) ordination analysis in R version 3.1.2 using the package vegan (Oksanen et al.,
Results
Environmental variability
Vertical sections of salinity in the water column (Figures 1B,C) showed variable contributions of Estuarine Fresh Water (EFW, 11ā21 psu) and Estuarine-Salty Water (ESW, 21ā31 psu) within the top 5 m. Between 5 and 30 m depth, ESW dominated during winter, whereas the influence of Modified Sub-Antarctic Waters (MSAAW, 31ā33 psu) increased from austral spring 2013 and autumn 2014 (Figure 1B). In July 2015 (austral winter), MSAAW was distributed from ~30 to ~100 m depth and Sub-Antarctic Water (SAAW, >33 psu) was present in waters below 100 m (Figure 1C). Temperature distribution in the top 30 m was characterized by a strong seasonality (Figures 1E,D), with cold waters (<10°C) in surface and subsurface layers during austral winter followed by an increase in temperature (>15°C) in the top 10 m during austral summer (December 2013āMarch 2014; Figure 1D). In austral winter, low temperatures coincided with periods of increased river discharge and precipitation (Figures 1D,H). Oxygen concentration was higher in surface (ca. 7 to 10 mL Lā1) than subsurface waters (3 to 7 mL Lā1, Figure 1F), where oxygen concentrations lower than 5 mL Lā1 were observed between December 2013 and April 2014 coinciding with the presence of higher salinity MSAAW (Figure 1F). During July 2015, the presence of hypoxic waters (<2 mL Lā1) was observed below 120 m (Figure 1G).
Nitrate (1 to ~20 μM) and phosphate (~0 to 4.3 μM) concentrations were lower in surface (1ā5 m) than subsurface and deeper waters during most of the study period (Table 1). Silicic acid concentrations were highly variable (<1 to >100 μM) with maximum values detected in austral winter in surface waters, and during winter and spring in subsurface waters (Table 1). Ammonia concentration ranged from 0.2 to 1.5 μM with maximum values in spring and summer (OctoberāDecember; Table 1). Chlorophyll-a concentrations varied from ~1 to >25 μg Lā1 in surface waters, with maximal values observed in autumn, winter and spring (Table 1). There were significant differences in nitrate, phosphate and chlorophyll-a concentrations between surface and subsurface waters, and in nitrate, phosphate, and ammonia between surface and deep waters (Table 2).
Table 2
| Variable | M-W U parameter | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Surface-subsurface | ||
| Nitrate | 45 | <0.001 |
| Phosphate | 42 | <0.001 |
| Silicic acid | 208 | 0.8 |
| Ammonia | 177 | 0.3 |
| Chlorophyll-a | 110 | 0.006 |
| Chao1 | 188 | 0.448 |
| Surface-deep | ||
| Nitrate | 24 | <0.006 |
| Phosphate | 23 | <0.005 |
| Silicic acid | 64 | 0.432 |
| Ammonia | 28 | 0.011 |
| Chlorophyll-a | 42 | 0.062 |
| Chao1 | 19 | 0.003 |
| Subsurface-deep | ||
| Nitrate | 50 | 0.355 |
| Phosphate | 41 | 0.148 |
| Silicic acid | 41 | 0.148 |
| Ammonia | 34.5 | 0.068 |
| Chlorophyll-a | 57 | 0.603 |
| Chao1 | 15 | 0.003 |
Statistical differences between surface and subsurface waters for environmental variables and prokaryotic richness based on the Mann-Whitney non-parametric U-test.
Significant differences at the 95% confidence level are indicated in bold.
Prokaryotic community diversity
Prokaryotic diversity was examined by comparing the distribution of 3250730 16S rRNA gene sequences of Bacteria and Archaea (Table 3), which corresponded to 13807 OTUs assigned to Bacteria and 413 to Archaea after removal of chimera and chloroplast sequences. Rarefaction curves (Supplementary Figure 1) showed that all samples had reached the curvilinear phase of sampling effort, and that most had started to plateau. Of a total of 9376 different OTUs identified after resampling, 11% of these were common to surface, subsurface and deep waters, with the highest percentage of shared OTUs (28%) common to surface and subsurface waters (Figure 2). OTU richness estimated by Chao1 ranged from 623 to 2,914 in surface waters, between 962 and 1,798 in subsurface waters and from 481 to 1,270 in deep waters (Figure 3). Chao1 values estimated for surface and subsurface waters were significantly different to those estimated for deep waters (Table 2). The highest values of Chao1 (>2,000) in surface waters were observed during winter 2013, 2014, and 2015, whereas the lowest values of OTU richness were found in summer 2014 coinciding with the seasonal increase in surface water temperature (Figure 3A). Significant differences (Mann-Whitney U = 23, p = 0.03) were observed for Chao1 values for surface waters between cold (June-September) and warm (October-May) periods (duration of cold and warm periods was defined according to short-term monthly average temperature reported by Schneider et al.,
Table 3
| Sample | Sample reads | Bacterial OTUs | Archaeal OTUs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun.13.2m | 100305 | 2858 | 40 |
| Jul.13.2m | 43990 | 1503 | 41 |
| Aug.13.2m | 17586 | 943 | 18 |
| Sep.13.2m | 342765 | 2237 | 28 |
| Oct.13.2m | 22794 | 781 | 4 |
| Nov.13.2m | 55982 | 1292 | 19 |
| Dec.13.2m | 42774 | 827 | 3 |
| Jan.14.2m | 31657 | 702 | 3 |
| Mar.14.2m | 20752 | 607 | 2 |
| Apr.14.2m | 34309 | 1221 | 19 |
| May.14.2m | 31109 | 1186 | 19 |
| Jun.14.2m | 24383 | 1402 | 40 |
| Jul.14.2m | 108803 | 2365 | 97 |
| Aug.13.14.2m | 30419 | 2270 | 52 |
| Sep.10.14.2m | 35607 | 1146 | 32 |
| Jul.10.15.1m | 69757 | 1724 | 17 |
| Jul.12.15.2m | 35267 | 1323 | 14 |
| Jul.14.15.2m | 269529 | 4093 | 54 |
| Jul.16.15.2m | 355816 | 3486 | 48 |
| Jul.10.15.5m | 25680 | 1197 | 11 |
| Jul.12.15.5m | 44779 | 1238 | 20 |
| Jul.14.15.5m | 13036 | 360 | 41 |
| Jul.16.15.5m | 54408 | 1423 | 13 |
| Jun.13.20m | 320735 | 3530 | 186 |
| Jul.13.20m | 34540 | 1455 | 79 |
| Aug.13.20m | 17217 | 1029 | 49 |
| Sep.13.20m | 21482 | 1077 | 89 |
| Oct.13.20m | 67339 | 1911 | 166 |
| Nov.13.20m | 29237 | 871 | 19 |
| Dec.13.20m | 29883 | 893 | 37 |
| Jan.14.20m | 13514 | 670 | 19 |
| Mar.14.20m | 134249 | 1805 | 32 |
| Apr.14.20m | 25851 | 1264 | 51 |
| May.14.20m | 27575 | 1338 | 75 |
| Jun.14.20m | 25139 | 1256 | 82 |
| Jul.14.20m | 59356 | 1681 | 132 |
| Aug.13.14.20m | 31951 | 1251 | 55 |
| Sep.10.14.8m | 27829 | 928 | 13 |
| Jul.10.15.15m | 134297 | 1937 | 87 |
| Jul.12.15.15m | 35442 | 940 | 41 |
| Jul.14.15.15m | 54497 | 1129 | 43 |
| Jul.16.15.15m | 26958 | 772 | 23 |
| Jul.10.15.50m | 101950 | 1235 | 106 |
| Jul.12.15.50m | 24921 | 306 | 56 |
| Jul.14.15.50m | 31869 | 796 | 70 |
| Jul.16.15.50m | 29492 | 765 | 41 |
| Jul.10.15.100m | 52840 | 1271 | 86 |
| Jul.14.15.100m | 48833 | 1099 | 120 |
| Jul.16.15.100m | 24902 | 455 | 70 |
Number of sequences and OTU abundance (after resampling) detected for prokaryotic assemblages in water samples from Puyuhuapi Fjord.
Figure 2

Venn diagram comparing the number of prokaryotic OTUs found in surface (1ā5 m), subsurface (8ā20 m), and deep (>50 m) waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord. Abundance and percentage of shared OTUs are also indicated.
Figure 3

Temporal variability in relative abundance (percentage of total sequences) of higher level taxa (phylum and classes) of prokaryotes, OTU richness (Chao1, red line) and temperature (blue line) in surface (A) and subsurface (B) waters (2 and 20 m, respectively) between June 2013 and September 2014 at the Boya station in Puyuhuapi Fjord. Vertical profiles of richness and relative abundance (C) are also shown from 10 July to 16 July 2015. Variation in vertical distribution of OTU richness and composition observed in July 14 was related to a strong mixing event resulting from the passage of a low-pressure system (Montero et al.,
Table 4
| Temperature | Salinity | Oxygen | Chl-a | Nitrate | Phosphate | Silicic acid | Ammonia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thaumarchaeota | 0.025 | 0.75 | ā0.698 | ā0.377 | 0.611 | 0.573 | 0.313 | ā0.281 |
| 0.862 | 0 | 0 | 0.008 | 0 | 0 | 0.028 | 0.051 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Thermoplasmata | 0.223 | 0.628 | ā0.432 | ā0.51 | 0.503 | 0.709 | ā0.08 | ā0.089 |
| 0.124 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.583 | 0.541 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Actinobacteria | ā0.423 | ā0.236 | 0.186 | 0.412 | ā0.141 | ā0.341 | 0.35 | ā0.294 |
| 0.002 | 0.102 | 0.202 | 0.003 | 0.335 | 0.016 | 0.014 | 0.04 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Bacteroidetes | ā0.084 | ā0.616 | 0.612 | 0.384 | ā0.441 | ā0.439 | ā0.303 | 0.282 |
| 0.565 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.035 | 0.049 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Cyanobacteria | ā0.297 | ā0.149 | 0.162 | 0.12 | ā0.045 | ā0.026 | ā0.127 | ā0.086 |
| 0.038 | 0.307 | 0.265 | 0.412 | 0.761 | 0.862 | 0.384 | 0.551 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Planctomycetes | ā0.003 | 0.639 | ā0.643 | ā0.254 | 0.655 | 0.504 | 0.294 | ā0.366 |
| 0.984 | 0 | 0 | 0.078 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Alphaproteobacteria | ā0.31 | ā0.619 | 0.615 | 0.444 | ā0.395 | ā0.443 | ā0.007 | 0.066 |
| 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.961 | 0.651 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Betaproteobacteria | ā0.532 | ā0.667 | 0.636 | 0.388 | ā0.338 | ā0.467 | 0.126 | ā0.163 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 | 0.018 | 0.001 | 0.39 | 0.262 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Deltaproteobacteria | 0.05 | 0.701 | ā0.621 | ā0.503 | 0.653 | 0.687 | 0.211 | ā0.073 |
| 0.734 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.146 | 0.618 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Epsilonproteobacteria | 0.015 | 0.441 | ā0.425 | ā0.081 | 0.212 | 0.04 | 0.345 | ā0.494 |
| 0.921 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.58 | 0.144 | 0.786 | 0.015 | 0 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 0.314 | 0.401 | ā0.516 | ā0.403 | 0.309 | 0.305 | 0.065 | 0.033 |
| 0.028 | 0.004 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.031 | 0.033 | 0.659 | 0.82 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Verrumicrobia | 0.316 | 0.201 | ā0.052 | ā0.272 | 0.162 | 0.394 | ā0.236 | 0.196 |
| 0.027 | 0.166 | 0.722 | 0.059 | 0.266 | 0.005 | 0.103 | 0.176 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| OTUs richness (Chao1) | ā0.527 | ā0.259 | 0.398 | ā0.077 | 0.073 | 0.144 | ā0.029 | 0.301 |
| 0 | 0.072 | 0.005 | 0.598 | 0.619 | 0.323 | 0.843 | 0.035 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Shannon index | ā0.076 | 0.375 | ā0.348 | ā0.179 | 0.496 | 0.408 | 0.126 | ā0.256 |
| 0.605 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.22 | 0 | 0.004 | 0.387 | 0.076 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | |
| Observed OTUs | ā0.48 | 0.032 | 0.046 | ā0.186 | 0.357 | 0.28 | 0.154 | 0.03 |
| 0 | 0.825 | 0.755 | 0.2 | 0.012 | 0.051 | 0.292 | 0.838 | |
| n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 | n = 49 |
Spearman correlation coefficients between major taxonomic groups and OTUs richness, and diversity, and environmental and biological parameters of waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord.
Values indicate correlation coefficient, pāvalue, and number of data. Significant correlations at the 95% confidence level are indicated in bold.
Prokaryotic community composition
At phylum and class levels, the composition of prokaryotic assemblages in surface waters was characterized by predominance of classes Flavobacteriales (Bacteroidetes) and Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, which together accounted for up to 90% of total sequences during Austral summer (Figure 3A). Subsurface waters were characterized by Thaumarchaeota which accounted for 5 to 40% of prokaryotic sequences, and by Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes which accounted for 18 to ~45% and up to 30% of total sequences, respectively (Figure 3B). With a relatively low proportion of total sequences, Verrumicrobia, Cyanobacteria (mostly picocyanobacteria of order Synechococcales), Actinobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria were more abundant in surface than in subsurface waters, whereas Planctomycetes and Deltaproteobacteria were more frequently detected in subsurface waters (Figures 3A,B). In July 2015, with the exception of July 14, prokaryotic composition in the top 20 m was similar to that observed in the 2013-2014 time series, whereas in deep waters OTUs of Thaumarchaeota and Gammaproteobacteria predominated and sequences of Epsilonproteobacteria increased their relative abundance (Figure 3C). Relative abundances of Thaumarchaeota, Thermoplasmata, Planctomycetes, and Deltaproteobacteria were significantly and positively correlated with salinity, nitrate and phosphate, and Bacteroidetes and Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria positively correlated with oxygen concentration (Table 4). On the contrary, significant negative correlations were observed for relative abundance of Thaumarchaeota, Planctomycetes, and Delta- and Gammaproteobacteria with oxygen, Bacteroidetes, Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria with salinity, and Thermoplasmata and Deltaproteobacteria with chlorophyll-a (Table 4).
At the OTU level, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS, based on BrayāCurtis distance matrix) evidenced variations in composition of prokaryotic communities among water masses, with distinguishable patterns of distribution for samples from EFW and MSAAW, whilst communities from ESW overlapped those from EFW and MSAAW (Figure 4). Segregation of prokaryotic communities amongst these waters masses was mostly explained by variations in salinity and oxygen concentration, whilst temperature and ammonia concentration were likely responsible for variations of composition between cold and warmer periods, particularly in EFW (Figure 4). PERMANOVA analysis showed significant differences between compositions of prokaryotic communities among water masses (p-value < 0.001, Pseudo-F = 5.73) and cold and warm periods (p-value < 0.001, Pseudo-F = 5.71). Among OTUs with more than 1000 counts (Figure 5, Table 5), 62% showed significant differences in their abundance (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05) between EFW and MSAAW, 47% between ESW and MSAAW, 42% between EFW and ESW, and ~33% between EFW, ESW and MSAAW. Based upon the distribution of OTU abundances among samples, and upon correlations with principal explanatory environmental variables, we identified taxa that were representative of the two water masses (Figure 5, Table 5).
Figure 4

Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling ordination (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis similarity analysis of prokaryotic communities identified in waters of the Puyuhuapi Fjord. Stress = 0.13. Colors represent predominant water masses and the ellipse shows the limits (at 95% confidence) of each water mass in the ordination space. Different symbols indicate samples collected during cold (June-September) and warm periods (October-May), and arrows represent environmental variables significantly correlated (p < 0.05) to the ordination axis. Arrows point the direction of the higher gradient (most rapid change) and their lengths are proportional to the degree of correlation with ordination.
Figure 5

Heatmap displaying the abundance of representative OTUs in water samples collected in Puyuhuapi Fjord (samples were sorted according to their distribution among water masses, left panel). Mean relative contribution of representative OTUs to microbial communities present in predominant water masses (middle panel) and heatmap showing significant (p < 0.05) correlation coefficients between OTUs and environmental factors (right panel). Colors in the text of the right panel indicate OTUs considered representative of EFW (red) and MSAAW (blue). Gray color in right panel indicates no significant correlation. Representative OTUs account for over 70% of total counts in rarefied OTU table and included OTUs with more than 1,000 counts.
Table 5
| OTU ID | Taxonomic assignment |
|---|---|
| OTU1 | Gammaproteobacteria; Alteromonadales; Alteromonadaceae; Glaciecola; |
| OTU2 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriia; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae; Sediminicola; |
| OTU3 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae; Octadecabacter; |
| OTU4 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU5 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU6 | Gammaproteobacteria; Alteromonadales; OM60 |
| OTU7 | Cyanobacteria; Synechococcales; Synechococcaceae; Synechococcus; |
| OTU8 | Betaproteobacteria; Methylophilales; Methylophilaceae |
| OTU9 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU10 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae; Flavobacterium; |
| OTU11 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU12 | Betaproteobacteria; Methylophilales; Methylophilaceae; Methylotenera; mobilis |
| OTU13 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae |
| OTU14 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae; Fluviicola; |
| OTU15 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU16 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU17 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae; Octadecabacter; |
| OTU18 | Betaproteobacteria; Rhodocyclales; Rhodocyclaceae |
| OTU19 | Alphaproteobacteria |
| OTU20 | Gammaproteobacteria; Alteromonadales; HTCC2188; HTCC; |
| OTU21 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae |
| OTU22 | BacteroidetesFlavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU23 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiotrichales; Piscirickettsiaceae |
| OTU24 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae; Fluviicola; |
| OTU25 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae |
| OTU26 | Betaproteobacteria; Methylophilales; Methylophilaceae |
| OTU27 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU28 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU29 | Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; Microbacteriaceae; Candidatus Aquiluna; rubra |
| OTU30 | Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; Microbacteriaceae; Candidatus Aquiluna; rubra |
| OTU31 | Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; Microbacteriaceae; Candidatus Aquiluna; rubra |
| OTU32 | Actinobacteria; Actinomycetales; Microbacteriaceae; Candidatus Aquiluna; rubra |
| OTU33 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU34 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU35 | Alphaproteobacteria; Kiloniellales; Kiloniellaceae |
| OTU36 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU37 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae; Polaribacter; |
| OTU38 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae |
| OTU39 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae |
| OTU40 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU41 | Proteobacteria; Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU42 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriia; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU43 | Actinobacteria; Acidimicrobiia; Acidimicrobiales; OCS155 |
| OTU44 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; |
| OTU45 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae; Nitrosopumilus; |
| OTU46 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae; Nitrosopumilus; |
| OTU47 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae |
| OTU48 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae; Nitrosopumilus; |
| OTU49 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU50 | Gammaproteobacteria; Alteromonadales; HTCC2188; HTCC; |
| OTU51 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae |
| OTU52 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rickettsiales; Pelagibacteraceae |
| OTU53 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiohalorhabdales; Thiohalorhabdaceae |
| OTU54 | BacteroidetesFlavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae; Flavobacterium; |
| OTU55 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiotrichales; Piscirickettsiaceae |
| OTU56 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiotrichales; Piscirickettsiaceae |
| OTU57 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiotrichales; Piscirickettsiaceae |
| OTU58 | Gammaproteobacteria; Thiohalorhabdales; Thiohalorhabdaceae |
| OTU59 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae |
| OTU60 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae; Nitrosopumilus; |
| OTU61 | Thaumarchaeota; Cenarchaeales; Cenarchaeaceae; Nitrosopumilus; |
| OTU62 | SAR406; AB16; Arctic96B-7; A714017; ZA3312c; |
| OTU63 | SAR406; AB16; Arctic96B-7; A714017; SargSea-WGS; |
| OTU64 | Proteobacteria; Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodospirillales; Rhodospirillaceae |
| OTU65 | Thermoplasmata; E2; Marine group II |
| OTU66 | Gammaproteobacteria; Oceanospirillales; Halomonadaceae; Candidatus Portiera;* |
| OTU67 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae |
| OTU68 | Bacteroidetes; NS9 |
| OTU69 | Alphaproteobacteria |
| OTU70 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU71 | Gammaproteobacteria; Alteromonadales; OM60 |
| OTU72 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU73 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU74 | BacteroidetesFlavobacteriales; Flavobacteriaceae |
| OTU75 | Alphaproteobacteria |
| OTU76 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae |
| OTU77 | Alphaproteobacteria; Rhodobacterales; Rhodobacteraceae; Pseudoruegeria; |
| OTU78 | Planctomycetes; Pirellulales; Pirellulaceae |
| OTU79 | Planctomycetes; Planctomycetales; Planctomycetaceae; Planctomyces; |
| OTU80 | Bacteroidetes; Flavobacteriales; Cryomorphaceae; Crocinitomix; |
| OTU81 | Cyanobacteria; Synechococcales; Synechococcaceae; Synechococcus; |
| OTU82 | Gammaproteobacteria; Vibrionales; Pseudoalteromonadaceae; Pseudoalteromonas; |
| OTU83 | Gammaproteobacteria; Pseudomonadales; Moraxellaceae; Psychrobacter; pacificensis |
Taxonomic assignment for main representative OTUs (OTUs containing more than 1000 sequences) identified in waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord.
Classification was carried out by comparison with the Greengenes database at a 97% similarity threshold.
The genus Candidatus Portiera is likely to be an error in the Greengenes database2.
Temporal variability of prokaryotic community
At higher taxonomic levels, temporal variability of community composition in surface waters was mostly characterized by opposing changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and Gammaproteobacteria (Figure 3A). These changes coincided with an increase in temperature between late austral winter 2013 (September) and summer 2014 (March) and a decrease in OTU richness (Figure 3A). Additionally, sequences of Cyanobacteria were more abundant during winter and spring 2014 and Verrumicrobia increased sharply during spring 2013 and autumn 2014 (Figure 3A). In subsurface waters, the proportion of Archaea increased sharply in spring 2013, and between autumn and winter 2014 (Figure 3B), coinciding with increases in salinity (Figure 1B).
At the OTU level, temporal variations were evidenced by loss of richness and decreased abundance in more than 65% of the representative OTUs of surface waters during austral summer (December 2013-March 2014; Figure 6, Table 5). Compared to surface waters, a low proportion of representative OTUs varied throughout the year in subsurface waters (Figure 7). The majority of OTUs that exhibited temporal changes were negatively correlated with temperature and ammonia concentration and positively with silicic acid concentration (Figure 6). Significant correlations were also detected between OTUs showing seasonal variability and abundance of diatoms and dinoflagellates (Supplementary Table 1) in surface and subsurface waters (Figures 6, 7). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for OTU abundances between cold (June-September) and warm periods (October-May) in ~50% of representative OTUs of surface waters (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Heatmap displaying the time series of abundance of representative OTUs in surface waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord (left panel). Middle panel shows the mean relative contribution of representative OTUs to microbial communities detected during cold and warm periods. Right panel shows heatmap of significant (p < 0.05) correlation coefficients between OTU abundance and environmental factors. OTUs marked with * indicate those taxa that showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between cold and warm periods.
Figure 7

Heatmap displaying the time series of abundance of representative OTUs in subsurface waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord (left panel). Middle panel show the relative contribution of representative OTUs to microbial communities detected during cold and warm periods. Right panel shows heatmap of significant (p < 0.05) correlation coefficients between OTU abundance and environmental factors. OTUs marked with * indicate those taxa that showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between cold and warm periods.
Discussion
Vertical and temporal changes of the microbial community at a single sampling site within waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord were assayed by analyzing variability in the composition of prokaryotic assemblages in a monthly time series. Our data demonstrated distinctive prokaryotic assemblages in predominant waters masses in the fjord, with salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration explaining most of variability of these assemblages between waters masses. A dramatic reduction of OTU richness and abundance of representative taxa was observed in surface waters during austral summer associated with the seasonal increase of surface water temperature. Considering that microbial diversity is assumed to be directly linked to functioning of ecosystems (Bernhard and Kelly,
Community composition of prokaryotes in water masses of Puyuhuapi fjord
The hydrographic structure of the water column observed during the study period was consistent with the estuarine circulation and water mass distribution previously described for Patagonian fjords generally (Silva et al.,
Consistent with this stratification of the water column, the composition of the prokaryotic community showed a discernible pattern of vertical zonation at higher taxonomic levels, with members of Bacteroidetes and Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria dominating surface waters, and the presence of abundant sequences of Archaea in subsurface and deep marine waters (Figure 3). Our observations are consistent with reports showing predominance of the same taxa of bacteria in large brackish environments (Riemann et al.,
Salinity and oxygen concentration exerted major controls on prokaryotic community composition among the contrasting water masses identified during the present study in Puyuhuapi Fjord (Figure 4). Salinity is known to be a major factor influencing global biogeography of microorganisms (Lozupone and Knight,
The prokaryotic community identified in EFW (Figure 5, Table 5) was characterized by predominance of OTUs matching Candidatus Aquilina sp. (Actinomycetales) and members of the families Rhodobacteraceae, Cryomorphaceae (Alphaproteobacteria), and Flavobacteriaceae (Bacteroidetes). We suggest that the predominant physicochemical conditions of surface waters of Puyuhuapi fjord, driven mainly by riverine input and meltwater discharges, confer a distinctive microbial signature to EFW. This suggestion is supported by negative correlations between the abundance of representative taxa of EFW, and salinity, temperature, nitrate and phosphate, and positive correlations with concentrations of oxygen and silicic acid (Figure 5). Moreover, some of the representative OTUs of EFW, such as Fluviicola sp. and Candidatus Aquiluna sp., corresponded to taxa considered to be characteristic of freshwater, and of coastal environments strongly influenced by freshwater, including polar fjords (O'Sullivan et al.,
In saline and less oxygenated MSAAW the most abundant taxa (Figure 5, Table 5) corresponded to OTUs identified as Nitrosopumilus sp. (Cenarchaeaceae; ~21% of representative OTUs), the order Oceanospirillales (~16%) and the families Flavobariaceae and Piscirickettsiaceaea (~9% each). The order Nitrosopumilales corresponds to a group of ammonia-oxidizing Archaea widely distributed in the ocean, and playing an important role in nitrogen cycling (Offre et al.,
We recognize limitations of our study in terms of whether a single point sampling site is representative of the fjord as a whole. However, our data clearly demonstrate the association between distinct prokaryotic OTUs and predominant water masses, which support that our sampling strategy (two-layer sampling during 2013-2014 together with a high frequency vertical profiling in winter 2015) was able to capture most of variability of microbial communities present in waters of the fjord. These water masses have been described as representative of the majority of the Patagonian fjords (e g., Sievers and Silva,
Main drivers of temporal variability of microbial community in Puyuhuapi fjord
Increase in temperature of surface waters during austral summer resulted in a dramatic reduction of Chao1 and in the abundance of more than 65% of the representative OTUs (Figures 3, 6). This relationship was further supported by a strong and significant negative correlation between OTU richness and temperature in surface waters (Spearman R = ā0.71, p < 0.001). Temperature is one of the major drivers of microbial diversity along latitudinal gradients in the oceans (Fuhrman et al.,
Several environmental parameters can influence marine microbial diversity on seasonal scales (Fuhrman et al.,
Figure 8

Power model explaining 70% of variability of OTU diversity (Chao1) as a function of temperature (p < 0.005) for data collected from surface waters during the study period in Puyuhuapi Fjord.
In aquatic environments, microbial activity and diversity are considered to be closely linked to overall ecosystem function (Finlay et al.,
Conclusions
We conclude that contrasting water masses of Puyuhuapi Fjord have distinctive microbial compositions, with salinity and oxygen being the first-order factors driving vertical segregation. Major intra-annual variations of microbial diversity in surface waters could be attributable to a seasonal increase of water temperature, producing a dramatic reduction of OTUs richness and individual abundance within the families Flavobacteriaceae, Rhodobacteraceae, and Cenarchaeaceae. Abundance of diatoms and dinoflagellates appears to influence abundance of specific taxa of microorganisms in Puyuhuapi Fjord waters, suggesting a high level of microbial specialization related to predominant phytoplankton populations. A conceptual model summarizing the main environmental forcing that controls microbial composition and diversity at intra- and inter-annual scale is hypothesized for the fjord (Figure 9). Changes in diversity can impact microbial activity and ecosystem function, and therefore biogeochemical cycling of the Patagonian fjord ecosystem, currently considered a net sink of CO2 in the eastern South Pacific Ocean (Torres et al.,
Figure 9

Conceptual model representing major changes in community structure of prokaryotes at intra- and inter-annual scales in waters of Puyuhuapi Fjord. At seasonal and shorter temporal scales, composition of microbial communities among predominant water masses is principally controlled by vertical changes in salinity and oxygen concentration. Taxa representative of Estuarine Fresh Water (EFW) occupy surface waters with low salinity and high oxygen concentration and taxa representative of MSAAW occupy more saline and less oxygenated deeper waters. Seasonal rise of temperature results in a conspicuous fall in OTU richness in surface water during summer. At the inter-annual scale, a trend of increasing average surface water temperature in winter is consistent with positive anomalies in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).
Statements
Author contributions
MG study design, data collection, analysis of sequences and interpretation of results, manuscript leader. DN analysis of temperature time series. GD study design, environmental data analysis and manuscript revision. PM study design, sample collection and analysis of environmental data. IP-S collection and analysis of physical data. SP critical revision and edition of final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Marine Organic Geochemistry laboratory team at UDEC and technical staff of Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia for support during fieldwork.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00277/full#supplementary-material
Footnotes
2.^McDonald, D., Hugenholtz, P. (2014). āPelagibacteraceaeā (and SAR86 clade) [Online forum comment]. Available at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/qiime-forum/8QfE3ta_NiE/Npwf6xJUFzgJ.
3.^http://research.jisao.washington.edu/pdo/
4.^http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/enso.shtml
References
1
AnderssonA. F.RiemannL.BertilssonS. (2010). Pyrosequencing reveals contrasting seasonal dynamics of taxa within Baltic Sea bacterioplankton communities. ISME J. 4, 171ā181. 10.1038/ismej.2009.108
2
ArrigoK. R. (2005). Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature437, 349ā355. 10.1038/nature04159
3
AuguetJ. C.BarberanA.CasamayorE. O. (2012). Global ecological patterns in uncultured Archaea. ISME J. 4, 182ā190. 10.1038/ismej.2009.109
4
AzamF. (1998). Microbial control of oceanic carbon flux: the plot thickens. Science280, 694ā696. 10.1126/science.280.5364.694
5
BanoN.RuffinS.RansonB.HollibaughJ. T. (2004). Phylogenetic composition of Arctic Ocean archaeal assemblages and comparison with Antarctic assemblages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 781ā789. 10.1128/AEM.70.2.781-789.2004
6
BernhardA. E.KellyJ. J. (2016). Editorial: linking ecosystem function to microbial diversity. Front. Microbiol. 7:1041. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01041
7
BokulichN. A.SubramanianS.FaithJ. J.GeversD.GordonJ. I.KnightR.et al. (2013). Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods10, 57ā59. 10.1038/nmeth.2276
8
BryantJ. A.AylwardF. O.EppleyJ. M.KarlD. M.ChurchM. J.DeLongE. F. (2016). Wind and sunlight shape microbial diversity in surface waters of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. ISME J. 10, 1308ā1322. 10.1038/ismej.2015.221
9
BuchanA.LeCleirG. R.GulvikC. A.GonzĆ”lezJ. M. (2014). Master recyclers: features and functions of bacteria associated with phytoplankton blooms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 686ā698. 10.1038/nrmicro3326
10
BunseC.PinhassiJ. (2017). Marine bacterioplankton seasonal succession dynamics. Trends Microbiol. 25, 494ā505. 10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.013
11
CalveteC.SobarzoM. (2011). Quantification of the surface brackish water layer and frontal zones in southern Chile an fjords between Boca del Guafo (43°30'S) and Estero Elefantes (46°30'S). Cont. Shelf Res. 3, 162ā171. 10.1016/j.csr.2010.09.013
12
CampbellB. J.EngelA. S.PorterM. L.TakaiK. (2006). The versatile E-proteobacteria: key players in sulphidic habitats. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 458ā468. 10.1038/nrmicro1414
13
CampbellB. J.KirchmanD. L. (2013). Bacterial diversity, community structure and potential growth rates along an estuarine salinity gradient. ISME J.7, 210ā220. 10.1038/ismej.2012.93
14
CampbellB. J.YuL.KirchmanD. L. (2011). Activity of abundant and rare bacteria in a coastal ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12776ā12781. 10.1073/pnas.1101405108
15
CampbellB. J.YuL.StrazaT. R. A.KirchmanD. L. (2009). Temporal changes in bacterial rRNA and rRNA genes in Delaware (USA) coastal waters. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 57, 123ā135. 10.3354/ame01335
16
CaporasoJ. G.KuczynskiJ.StombaughJ.BittingerK.BushmanF. D.CostelloE. K.et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods7, 335ā336. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303
17
ChowC. E. T.SachdevaR.CramJ. A.SteeleJ. A.NeedhamD. M.PatelA.et al. (2013). Temporal variability and coherence of euphotic zone bacterial communities over a decade in the Southern California Bight. ISME J. 7, 2259ā2273. 10.1038/ismej.2013.122
18
CollinsR. E.RocapG.DemingJ. W. (2010). Persistence of bacterial and archaeal communities in sea ice through an Arctic winter. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1828ā1841. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02179.x
19
CowieR. O. M.MaasE. W.RyanK. G. (2011). Archaeal diversity revealed in Antarctic sea ice. Antarct. Sci. 23, 531ā536. 10.1017/S0954102011000368
20
DangH.LovellC. R. (2016). Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 91ā138. 10.1128/MMBR.00037-15
21
DeSantisT. Z.HugenholtzP.LarsenN.RojasM. E.BrodieL.KellerK.et al. (2006). Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72, 5069ā5072. 10.1128/AEM.03006-05
22
DiazR. J.RosenbergR. (2008). Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science321, 926ā929. 10.1126/science.1156401
23
DoneyS. C. (2010). The growing human footprint on coastal and open-ocean biogeochemistry. Science328, 1512ā1516. 10.1126/science.1185198
24
El-SwaisH.DunnK. A.BielawskiJ. P.LiW. K.WalshD. A. (2015). Seasonal assemblages and short-lived blooms in coastal north-west Atlantic Ocean bacterioplankton. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 3642ā3661. 10.1111/1462-2920.12629
25
FalkowskiP. G.FenchelT.DelongE. F. (2008). The microbial engines that drive earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science320, 1034ā1039. 10.1126/science.1153213
26
FinlayB. J.MaberlyS. C.CooperJ. I. (1997). Microbial diversity and ecosystem function. Oikos80, 209ā213. 10.2307/3546587
27
FortunatoC. S.CrumpB. C. (2011). Bacterioplankton community variation across river to ocean environmental gradients. Microb. Ecol. 62, 374ā382. 10.1007/s00248-011-9805-z
28
FortunatoC. S.CrumpB. C. (2015). Microbial gene abundance and expression patterns across a river to ocean salinity gradientPLoS ONE10:e0140578. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140578
29
FortunatoC. S.EilerA.HerfortL.NeedobaJ. A.PetersonT. D.CrumpB. C. (2013). Determining indicator taxa across spatial and seasonal gradients in the Columbia River coastal margin. ISME J. 7, 1899ā1911. 10.1038/ismej.2013.79
30
FortunatoC. S.HerfortL.ZuberP.BaptistaA. M.CrumpB. C. (2012). Spatial variability overhelms seasonal patterns in bacterioplankton communities across a river to ocean gradient. ISME J. 6, 554ā563. 10.1038/ismej.2011.135
31
FuerstJ. A.SagulenkoE. (2011). Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 403ā413. 10.1038/nrmicro2578
32
FuhrmanJ. A.CramJ. A.NeedhamD. M. (2015). Marine microbial community dynamics and their ecological interpretation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.13, 133ā146. 10.1038/nrmicro3417
33
FuhrmanJ. A.HewsonI.SchwalbachM. S.SteeleJ. A.BrownM. V.NaeemS. (2006). Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.103, 13104ā13109. 10.1073/pnas.0602399103
34
FuhrmanJ. A.SteeleJ. A.HewsonI.SchwalbachM. S.BrownM. V.GreenJ. L.et al. (2008). A latitudinal diversity gradient in planktonic marine bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 7774ā7778. 10.1073/pnas.0803070105
35
GalandP. E.CasamayorE. O.KirchmanD. L.PotvinM.LovejoyC. (2009a). Unique archaeal assemblages in the Arctic Ocean unveiled by massively parallel tag sequencing. ISME J. 3, 860ā869. 10.1038/ismej.2009.23
36
GalandP. E.LovejoyC.HamiltonA. K.IngramR. G.PedneaultE.CarmackE. C. (2009b). Archaeal diversity and a gene for ammonia oxidation are coupled to oceanic circulation. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 971ā980. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01822.x
37
GalandP. E.LovejoyC.PouliotJ.VincentW. F. (2008). Heterogeneous archaeal communities in the particle-rich environment of an arctic shelf ecosystem. J. Mar. Syst. 74, 774ā782. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.12.001
38
GalandP. E.PotvinM.CasamayorE. O.LovejoyC. (2010). Hydrography shapes bacterial biogeography of the deep Arctic Ocean. ISME J. 4, 564ā576. 10.1038/ismej.2009.134
39
GarreaudR.LopezP.MinvielleM.RojasM. (2013). Large-scale control on the patagonian climate. J. Climate26, 215ā230. 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00001.1
40
GattusoJ. P.FarnkignoulleM.WollastR. (1998). Carbon and carbonate metabolisms in coastal aquatic ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 405ā434. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.405
41
GilbertJ. A.SteeleJ. A.CaporasoJ. G.SteinbrückL.ReederJ.TempertonB.et al. (2012). Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. ISME J. 6, 298ā308. 10.1038/ismej.2011.107
42
GiovannoniS. J.StinglU. (2005). Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature437, 343ā348. 10.1038/nature04158
43
GiovannoniS. J.VerginK. L. (2012). Seasonality in ocean microbial communities. Science335, 671ā676. 10.1126/science.1198078
44
GonzĆ”lezH. E.CalderónM. J.CastroL.ClementA.CuevasL. A.DaneriG.et al. (2010). Primary production and its fate in the pelagic food web of the ReloncavĆ Fjord and plankton dynamics of the Interior Sea of ChiloĆ©, Northern Patagonia, Chile. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 402, 13ā30. 10.3354/meps08360
45
GonzĆ”lezH. E.CastroL.DaneriG.IriarteJ. L.SilvaN.VargasC. A.et al. (2011). Seasonal plankton variability in Chilean Patagonia fjords: carbon flow through the pelagic food web of the Aysen Fjord and plankton dynamics in the Moraleda Channel basin. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 225ā243. 10.1016/j.csr.2010.08.010
46
GonzĆ”lezH. E.CastroL. R.DaneriG.IriarteJ. L.SilvaN.TapiaF.et al. (2013). Land-ocean gradient in haline stratification and its effects on plankton dynamics and trophic carbon fluxes in Chilean Patagonian fjords (47°-50° S). Prog. Oceanogr. 119, 32ā47. 10.1016/j.pocean.2013.06.003
47
GutiĆ©rrezM. H.GalandP. E.MoffatC.PantojaS. (2015). Melting glacier impacts community structure of Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi in a Chilean Patagonia fjord. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 3882ā3897. 10.1111/1462-2920.12872
48
HajduS.HƶglanderH.LarssonU. (2007). Phytoplankton vertical distribution and composition in Baltic Sea cyanobacterial blooms. Harmful Algae6, 189ā205. 10.1016/j.hal.2006.07.006
49
HamdanL. J.CoffinR. B.SikaroodiM.GreinertJ.TreudeT.GillevetP. M. (2013). Ocean currents shape the microbiome of Arctic marine sediments. ISME J. 7, 685ā696. 10.1038/ismej.2012.143
50
HerlemannD. P.LundinD.AnderssonA. F.LabrenzM.JürgensK. (2016). Phylogenetic signals of salinity and season in bacterial community composition across the salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. Front. Microbiol. 7:1883. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01883
51
HerlemannD. P. R.LabrenzM.JürgensK.BertilssonS.WaniekJ. J.AnderssonA. F. (2011). Transition in bacterial communities along the 200 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571ā1579. 10.1038/ismej.2011.41
52
IriarteJ. L.León-MuƱozJ.MarcĆ©R.ClĆ©mentA.LaraC. (2016). Influence of seasonal freshwater streamflow regimes on phytoplankton blooms in a Patagonian fjord. New Zeal. J. Mar. Freshw. 51, 304ā315. 10.1080/00288330.2016.1220955
53
KangI.LeeK.YangS. J.ChoiA.KangD.LeeK. Y.et al. (2012). Genome sequence of āCandidatus Aquilunaā sp. strain IMCC13023, a marine member of the actinobacteria isolated from an Arctic Fjord. J. Bacteriol. 194, 3550ā3551. 10.1128/JB.00586-12
54
LamendellaR.StruttS.BorglinS.ChakrabortyR.TasN.MasonO. U.et al. (2014). Assessment of the deepwater horizon oil spill impact on Gulf coast microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 5:130. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00130
55
LandaM.BlainS.ChristakiU.MonchyS.ObernostererI. (2016). Shifts in bacterial community composition associated with increased carbon cycling in a mosaic of phytoplankton blooms. ISME J. 10, 39ā50. 10.1038/ismej.2015.105
56
LaraC.SaldĆasG. S.TapiaF. J.IriarteJ. L.BroitmanB. R. (2016). Interannual variability in temporal patterns of Chlorophyllāa and their potential influence on the supply of mussel larvae to inner waters in northern Patagonia (41ā44°S). J. Mar. Syst. 155, 11ā18. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.10.010
57
LƶscherC. R.KockA.KoennekeM.LaRocheJ.BangeH. W.SchmitzR. A. (2012). Production of oceanic nitrous oxide by ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Biogeoscience9, 2419ā2429. 10.5194/bg-9-2419-2012
58
LozuponeC. A.KnightR. (2007). Global patterns in bacterial diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 11436ā11440. 10.1073/pnas.0611525104
59
MasonO. U.HazenT. C.BorglinS.ChainP. S. G.DubinskyE. A.FortneyJ. L.et al. (2012). Metagenome, metatranscriptome and single-cell sequencing reveal microbial response to deepwater horizon oil spill. ISME J. 6, 1715ā1727. 10.1038/ismej.2012.59
60
MonteroP.DaneriG.GonzĆ”lezH. E.IriarteJ. L.TapiaF. J.LizĆ”rragaL.et al. (2011). Seasonal variability of primary production in a fjord ecosystem of the Chilean Patagonia: Implications for the transfer of carbon within pelagic food webs. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 202ā215. 10.1016/j.csr.2010.09.003
61
MonteroP.DaneriG.TapiaF.IriarteJ. L.CrawfordD. (2017a). Diatom blooms and primary production in a channel ecosystem of central Patagonia. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 45, 999ā1016. 10.3856/vol45-issue5-fulltext-16
62
MonteroP.PĆ©rez-SantosI.DaneriG.GutiĆ©rrezM. H.IgorG.SeguelR.et al. (2017b). A winter dinoflagellate bloom drives high rates of primary production in a Patagonian fjord ecosystem. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 199, 105ā116. 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.09.027
63
OffreP.SpangA.SchleperC. (2013). Archaea in biogeochemical cycles. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 437ā457. 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155614
64
OksanenA. J.BlanchetF. G.KindtR.MinchinP. R.HaraR. B. O.SimpsonG. L.et al. (2013). Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0ā5. Available online at: https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan
65
O'SullivanL. A.RinnaJ.HumphreysG.WeightmanA. J.FryJ. C. (2005). Fluviicola taffensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel freshwater bacterium of the family Cryomorphaceae in the phylum āBacteroidetesā. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.55, 2189ā2194. 10.1099/ijs.0.63736-0
66
OttesenE. A.YougC. R.EppleyJ. M.RyanJ. P.ChavezF. P.ScholinC. A.et al. (2012). Pattern and synchrony of gene expression among sympatric marine microbial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110, E488āE497. 10.1073/pnas.1222099110
67
PantojaS.IriarteJ. L.GutiĆ©rrezM. H.CalveteC. (2005). āThe southern chile continental margin,ā in Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes in Continental Margins, eds LiuK. K.AtkinsonL.QuiƱonesR.Talaue-McManusL. (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 265ā272.
68
ParsonsT. R.MaitaY.LalliC. M. (1984). A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
69
PĆ©rez-SantosI.GarcĆ©s-VargasJ.SchneiderW.RossL.ParraS.Valle-LevinsonA. (2014). Double-diffusivelayering and mixing in Patagonian fjords. Prog. Oceanogr. 129, 35ā49. 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.03.012
70
PickardG. (1971). Some physical oceanographic features of inlets of Chile. J. Fish Board Can. 28, 1077ā1106. 10.1139/f71-163
71
PinhassiJ.HagstrƶmA. (2000). Seasonal succession in marine bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 21, 245ā256. 10.3354/ame021245
72
PiquetA. M. T.MaatD. S.Confurius-GunsV.SintesE.HerndlG. J.van de PolW. H.et al. (2015). Springtime dynamics, productivity and activity of prokaryotes in two Arctic fjords. Polar Biol. 39, 1749ā1763. 10.1007/s00300-015-1866-x
73
PiquetA. M. T.ScheepensJ. F.BolhuisH.WienckeC.BumaA. G. J. (2010). Variability of protistan and bacterial communities in two Arctic fjords (Spitsbergen). Polar Biol. 33, 1521ā1536. 10.1007/s00300-010-0841-9
74
PiquetA. M. T.van de PollW. H.VisserR. J. W.WienckeC.BolhuisH.BumaA. G. J. (2014). Springtime phytoplankton dynamics in Arctic Krossfjorden and Kongsfjorden (Spitsbergen) as a function of glacier proximity. Biogeosciences11, 2263ā2279. 10.5194/bg-11-2263-2014
75
PrasadS.ManasaP.BuddhiS.TirunagariP.BegumZ.RajanS.et al. (2014). Diversity and bioprospective potential (cold-active enzymes) of cultivable marine bacteria from the subarctic glacial fjord, Kongsfjorden. Curr. Microbiol. 68, 233ā238. 10.1007/s00284-013-0467-6
76
QuintanaJ. M.AceitunoP. (2012). Changes in the rainfall regime along the extratropical west coast of South America (Chile): 30-43° S. Atmósfera25, 1ā22.
77
RĆosF.KilianR.MutschkeE. (2016). Chlorophyll-a thin layers in the Magellan fjord system: the role of the water column stratification. Cont. Shelf Res. 124, 1ā12. 10.1016/j.csr.2016.04.011
78
RiemannL.LeitetC.PommierT.SimuK.HolmfeldtK.LarssonU.et al. (2008). The native bacterioplankton community in the central Baltic Sea is influenced by freshwater bacterial species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.74, 503ā515. 10.1128/AEM.01983-07
79
RozasM.EnrĆquezR. (2014). Piscirickettsiosis and Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish: a review. J. Fish Dis. 37, 163ā188. 10.1111/jfd.12211
80
SchneiderW.PĆ©rez-SantosI.RossL.BravoL.SeguelR.HernĆ”ndezF. (2014). On the oceanography of Puyuhuapi Channel. Prog. Oceanogr. 129, 8ā18. 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.03.007
81
SepĆŗlvedaJ.PantojaS.HughenK. A. (2011). Sources and distribution of organic matter in northern Patagonia fjords, Chile (~44-47° S): a multi-tracer approach for carbon cycling assessment. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 315ā329. 10.1016/j.csr.2010.05.013
82
SieversH.SilvaN. (2008). āWater masses and circulation in austral Chilean channels and fjords,ā in Progress in the Oceanographic Knowledge of Chilean Interior Waters, from Puerto Montt to Cape Horn, eds SilvaS.PalmaS. (ValparaĆso: ComitĆ© OceanogrĆ”fico Nacional, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaĆso), 53ā58.
83
SignoriC. M.ThomasF.Enrich-PrastA.PolleryR. C.SievertS. M. (2014). Microbial diversity and community structure across environmental gradients in Bransfield Strait, Western Antarctic Peninsula. Front. Microbiol. 5:647. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00647
84
SilvaN.CalveteC.SieversH. (1998). Masas de agua y circulación para algunos canales australes entre Puerto Montt y Laguna San Rafael, Chile (Crucero Cimar-Fiordo 1). Cienc. Tecnol. Mar. 21, 17ā48.
85
SilvaN.VargasC. A. (2014). Hypoxia in Chilean Patagonia fjords. Prog. Oceanogr. 129, 62ā74. 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.016
86
SmithM. W.HerfortL.TyrolK.SuciuD.CampbellV.CrumpB. C.et al. (2010). Seasonal changes in bacterial and archaeal gene expression patterns across salinity gradients in the Columbia River coastal margin. PLoS ONE5:e1331210.1371/journal.pone.0013312
87
SmithR. W.BianchiT. S.AllisonM.SavageC.GalyV. (2015). High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 8, 450ā454. 10.1038/ngeo2421
88
SolorzanoL. (1969). Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14, 799ā801.
89
StalL. J.StaalM.VillbrandtM. (1999). Nutrient control of cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol.18, 165ā173. 10.3354/ame018165
90
StevensH.UlloaO. (2008). Bacterial diversity in the oxygen minimum zone of the eastern tropical South Pacific. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 1244ā1259. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01539.x
91
StoresundJ. E.ErgaS. R.RayJ. L.ThingstadT. F.SandaaR. A. (2015). Top-down and bottom-up control on bacterial diversity in a western Norwegian deep-silled fjord. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.91:fiv076. 10.1093/femsec/fiv076
92
StricklandJ. D.ParsonsT. R. (1972). A Manual of Sea Water Analysis. Otawa, ON: Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
93
TeelingH.FuchsB. M.BecherD.KlockowC.GardebrechtA.BenkeC. M.et al. (2012). Substrate-controlled succession of marine bacterioplankton populations induced by a phytoplankton bloom. Science4, 608ā611. 10.1126/science.1218344
94
TeiraE.LebaronP.van AkenH.HerndlG. J. (2006). Distribution and activity of bacteria and Archaea in the deep water masses of the North Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2131ā2144. 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2131
95
TeskeA.DurbinA.ZiervogelK.CoxC.ArnostiC. (2011). Microbial community composition and function in permanently cold seawater and sediments from an arctic fjord of Svalbard. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2008ā2018. 10.1128/AEM.01507-10
96
TorresR.PantojaS.HaradaN.GonzƔlezH. E.DaneriG.FrangopulosM.et al. (2011). Air-sea CO2 fluxes along the coast of Chile: from CO2 outgassing in central northern upwelling waters to CO2 uptake in southern Patagonian fjords. J. Geophys. Res. 116:C09006. 10.1029/2010JC006344
97
TyrrellT. (2011). Anthropogenic modification of the oceans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A369, 887ā908. 10.1098/rsta.2010.0334
98
VarelaM. M.van AkenH. M.SintesE.HerndlG. J. (2008). Latitudinal trends of Crenarchaeota and Bacteria in the meso- and bathypelagic water masses of the Eastern North Atlantic. Environ. Microbiol.10, 110ā124. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01437.x
99
WalshE. A.KirkpatrickJ. B.RutherfordS. D.SmithD. C.SoginM.D'HondtS. (2015). Bacterial diversity and community composition from seasurface to subseafloor. ISME J. 10, 979ā989. 10.1038/ismej.2015.175
100
WebsterG.O'SullivanL. A.MengY.WilliamsA. S.SassA. M.WatkinsA. J.et al. (2015). Archaeal community diversity and abundance changes along a natural salinity gradient in estuarine sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91, 1ā18. 10.1093/femsec/fiu025
101
WrightJ. J.KonwarK. M.HallamS. J. (2012). Microbial ecology of expanding oxygen minimum zones. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.10, 381ā394. 10.1038/nrmicro2778
102
XiaX.GuoW.LiuH. (2015). Dynamics of the bacterial and archaeal communities in the Northern South China Sea revealed by 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Deep Sea Res. II117, 97ā107. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.05.016
103
YilmazP.YarzaP.RappJ. Z.GlƶcknerF. O. (2016). Expanding the world of marine bacterial and archaeal clades. Front. Microbiol. 6:1524. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01524
104
ZaikovaE.WalshD. A.StilwellC. P.MohnW. W.TortellP. D.HallanS. J. (2010). Microbial community dynamics in a seasonally anoxic fjord: saanich inlet, British Columbia. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 172ā191. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02058.x
105
ZengY.ZhengT.LiH. (2009). Community composition of the marine bacterioplankton in Kongsfjorden (Spitsbergen) as revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis. Polar Biol. 32, 1447ā1460. 10.1007/s00300-009-0641-2
106
ZengY. X.ZhangF.HeJ. F.LeeS. H.QiaoZ. Y.YuY.et al. (2013). Bacterioplankton community structure in the Arctic waters as revealed by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek103, 1309ā1319. 10.1007/s10482-013-9912-6
107
ZhangC. L.XieW.Martin-CuadradoA. B.Rodriguez-ValeraF. (2015). Marine group II Archaea, potentially important players in the global ocean carbon cycle. Front. Microbiol. 6:1108. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01108
108
ZingerL.Amaral-ZettlerL. A.FuhrmanJ. A.Horner-DevineM. C.HuseS. M.WelchD. B. M.et al. (2011). Global patterns of bacterial beta-diversity in seafloor and seawater ecosystems. PLoS ONE6:e24570. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024570
Summary
Keywords
prokaryotic communities, environmental drivers, winter temperature trend, reducing diversity, Puyuhuapi fjord, Chilean Patagonia
Citation
GutiƩrrez MH, NarvƔez D, Daneri G, Montero P, PƩrez-Santos I and Pantoja S (2018) Linking Seasonal Reduction of Microbial Diversity to Increase in Winter Temperature of Waters of a Chilean Patagonia Fjord. Front. Mar. Sci. 5:277. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00277
Received
15 January 2018
Accepted
20 July 2018
Published
14 August 2018
Volume
5 - 2018
Edited by
Hongyue Dang, Xiamen University, China
Reviewed by
Angelina Lo Giudice, Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy; Klaus Jürgens, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (LG), Germany
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Gutiérrez, NarvÔez, Daneri, Montero, Pérez-Santos and Pantoja.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marcelo H. GutiƩrrez magutier@udec.cl
This article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.