Abstract
The northernmost segment of the Gorda mid-ocean ridge is the site of a small-volume eruption in 1996 and the persistent off-axis Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent field. To better understand the geologic setting and formation of these features, 1-m resolution bathymetric mapping using autonomous underwater vehicles was completed in 2016. The mapped region covers 35 km2 and 15.6 km of the volcanic axis from south of the 1996 lava flows, and a cross section for ∼4.5 km perpendicular to the axis, that extends beyond the Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent field. A proposed 1996 flow ∼7 km south of previously mapped flows is an artifact from a poor pre-eruption survey. The 1996 flows consist of three discrete steep hummocky mounds of pillows and syneruptive talus. The Sea Cliff hydrothermal field is located a few km north of the narrowest, shallowest section of the ridge segment, 2.6 km east of the center of the neovolcanic zone, and ∼370 m above the average depth of the axial graben on the largest offset ridge-parallel fault. No evidence supports the prior hypothesis that the site is located where two fault systems intersect. The axial graben is asymmetrical with larger fault offsets on the east side. The ridge axis below the hydrothermal field and to the south toward the 1996 flows is constructed dominantly of hummocky flows of pillow basalt, many unusually steep-sided, with syneruptive talus at the base of their steep slopes. Three channelized flows ponded between steep hummocky flows, and then partially drained. Some low-eruption-rate hummocky flows and high-eruption-rate channelized flows have nearly identical compositions, supporting the idea that eruption rates on mid-ocean ridges vary because of different dike widths. Four volcanic structures with volumes between 0.18 and 0.25 km3 occur in the axial graben south of the 1996 flows. Two are flat-topped cones, another is a 1.5-km diameter inflated hummocky flow with 7 pit craters that demonstrate that the flow had a molten interior during growth. The fourth voluminous structure is a steep ridge with abundant syneruptive talus on its lower slopes. The North Gorda segment is an end-member, structurally and volcanically, compared with other Pacific intermediate-rate spreading ridges.
Introduction
Construction of the oceanic crust requires frequent eruptions along the 65,000 km-long mid-ocean ridge system. Yet, such eruptions are infrequently documented or studied in detail (Rubin et al., 2012) to decipher how the crust is constructed and then modified as it migrates away from the neovolcanic axis of the ridge. What are the volumes, rates, styles, and frequency of eruptions at mid-ocean ridges with different spreading rates? What percent of eruptions produce hummocky flows of pillow lavas and what percent channelized flows of sheet lava? Is talus formed along younger axis-parallel normal faults or is some syneruptive? These are volcanological questions that have been addressed for decades (e.g., Perfit and Chadwick, 1998). Subsequent modification of the crust introduces more questions. What controls the location of on-and off-axis hydrothermal venting? Sediment accumulates on new lava flows, but how quickly does it subdue the surface morphology of the flows and bury them? As crustal accretion continues, how and where is the newly formed crust faulted?
Answers to these and other questions about crustal formation and modification require detailed observations and sampling at a range of ridge segments spreading at different rates and with different axial morphologies. Most such studies have been done at faster spreading segments of the East Pacific Rise (e.g., White et al., 2000, 2002; Fornari et al., 2004; Soule et al., 2005, 2007, 2009; Fundis et al., 2010; Waters et al., 2013; Le Saout et al., 2014) or the slow spreading Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) (e.g., ; Smith and Cann, 1992, 1993; ; Yeo et al., 2012; Yeo and Searle, 2013). Similar high-resolution studies are published for some intermediate-spreading ridges in the Pacific that range from full-spreading rates of 4.9 to 6.0 cm/yr, including the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge (Stakes et al., 2006), the Galapagos Spreading Center (), the Endeavor Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge (), and the northernmost segment of the East Pacific Rise named Alarcon Rise ().
Observations and sampling are expensive and time-consuming to acquire, and much of what has been collected on the Gorda Ridge, the intermediate-spreading-rate mid-ocean ridge offshore southern Oregon and northern California (Figure 1), was acquired prior to availability of reliable GPS ship navigation or with bathymetric control too poor to define their geological setting. These older data can be repurposed to constrain modern studies if they can be placed into a spatial and temporal framework, such as provided by 1–1.5 m resolution bathymetry collected by autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Here, we combine newly acquired AUV maps with mostly published dive observations and hydrothermal deposit and lava flow samples collected between 1983 and 2005 on the North Gorda segment of the Gorda Ridge. These data provide new insights into an eruption that occurred in 1996, crustal accretion processes, petrology and ridge structure along and across the segment, variables that control eruption rates and therefore lava flow morphology, and the geology and setting of the off-axis Sea Cliff hydrothermal site.
FIGURE 1
Geologic Setting
The Gorda Ridge is an intermediate-rate ridge with a full-spreading rate of 55 mm/yr, roughly the middle of the 49–60 mm/yr range of spreading rates of Pacific intermediate-rate ridges (DeMets et al., 2010). Despite its average intermediate spreading rate, the Gorda Ridge is a structural end-member because its unusually deep, wide axial graben resembles those on slower-spreading ridges such as the MAR (e.g., Murton and Rona, 2015), as noted by and . The Gorda Ridge graben, at up to 700 m deeper than the surrounding seafloor and 20 km wide, is neither as deep nor as wide as the MAR axial graben, but is still wider and deeper than axial graben at other intermediate-rate ridges such as the Endeavor segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge (). The Gorda Ridge is divided into five offset segments named North Gorda, Jackson, Central, Phoenix and Escanaba from north to south (). An eruption occurred in 1996 less than 10 km south of the narrowest, shallowest part of the North Gorda segment, but still where the spreading rate is fastest and the magma supply is most robust on Gorda Ridge (). The North Gorda segment is 65 km long and has a narrow (2 km wide), 3000 m below sea level deep axial valley in the central part, widening to 5–10 km wide and 3500–4000 m deep to the north and south.
Most work on Gorda Ridge has been conducted on the North Gorda (Figure 1) and Escanaba segments where active hydrothermal vent fields named, respectively, Sea Cliff or alternately, GR 14 (Rona et al., 1990; Von Damm et al., 2006) and NESCA (Zierenberg et al., 1994; Von Damm et al., 2005) are located. An additional hydrothermal discharge site near the Blanco Transform existed in 1985 and is termed the GR 15 site (Rona et al., 1992), but the vents have never been pin-pointed nor sampled. The Sea Cliff vent field is located ∼3 km north of the narrowest, shallowest portion of the North Gorda axis, but is unusual in being located 2.2 km east of and ∼350 m above the axial valley at −2720 m depth (distances and depths modified from Rona et al., 1990; Von Damm et al., 2006).
Prior Work
Most geological studies on the North Gorda segment of the Gorda mid-ocean ridge were completed prior to introduction of GPS navigation, in contrast to many other parts of the global ridge system. The first such study focused on dredging of lava samples along the entire Gorda Ridge in 1983 (). This was closely followed by hydrocast surveys to assess the potential for hydrothermal discharge (). Camera tows, coring, and dredging surveys (Howard and Fisk, 1988; Rona and Clague, 1989; ; ) pinpointed a likely hydrothermal source high on the east wall of the axial graben after a water column anomaly was discovered. Active high-temperature venting was discovered during a series of five dives using the U.S. Navy’s Sea Cliff manned submersible in 1988 and named the Sea Cliff hydrothermal field (Rona et al., 1990). Recovered samples consisted of silicified volcaniclastic rocks (Zierenberg et al., 1995). Hydrothermal fluids were not collected during the Sea Cliff dives, but the clear ∼305°C hydrothermal fluids collected during ROV Tiburon dives from 2000 to 2004 had lower Cl contents than seawater and contained extremely low transition metal concentrations (Von Damm et al., 2006). The inference was that the metals had precipitated out below the seafloor due to the slightly elevated pH of the fluids. The elevated pH was attributed to dissolution of calcite in the ocean crust during the roughly 100,000 years since the host lavas erupted on the ridge axis. The hydrothermal fluids at the Sea Cliff site were analyzed by in situ Raman spectroscopy during four ROV Tiburon dives in 2004 (White et al., 2006), and showed removal of seawater sulfate in the subsurface, leading to formation of anhydrite that hydrates to gypsum in the chimney samples. Fluid samples from one of these dives are the most recently collected vent fluids (Von Damm et al., 2006). The vent-specific biological community contains many of the same animals as seen at the NESCA site on the Escanaba Trough segment of the ridge (Van Dover et al., 1990; ). A new vent field 775 m north of Sea Cliff field was discovered in 2019 during Ocean Exploration Trust’s R/V Nautilus cruise NA108 and named Apollo (C. German, personal communication). It is at 2727 m depth along the same fault bench and has similar characteristics to the Sea Cliff site (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
In February 1996, seismic activity (Fox and Dziak, 1998) ∼11 km south of the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site was detected with the Navy’s SOSUS hydrophone array. Several rapid response cruises using hull-mounted multibeam sonar, towed camera, and the remotely operated vehicles (ROV) ATV and Jason discovered, mapped, and sampled a new lava flow (
Methods
The 1-m resolution bathymetric data were collected by MBARI using Dorado class AUVs equipped for seafloor mapping with multibeam sonar, chirp sidescan sonar, and chirp sub-bottom profiler (
The 2009 survey was conducted using the AUV D. Allan B. operated from R/V Zephyr; at that time the AUV fielded a 200 kHz Reson 7125 multibeam, dual frequency 110 kHz/410 kHz Edgetech chirp sidescan sonar, and a 2–16 kHz sweep Edgetech sub-bottom profiler. The 2016 surveys were collected using two mapping AUVs operated simultaneously from R/V Rachel Carson; these vehicles each fielded a 400 kHz Reson 7125 multibeam, a 110 kHz Edgetech chirp sidescan, and a 1–6 kHz swap Edgetech sub-bottom profiler. All three AUV survey missions were conducted using a 50 m altitude and a 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/hr) speed for a 16–17 h duration. The AUVs also carry SeaBird SBE-49 fastCat CTD and Paroscientific pressure sensors; during the 2009 survey the AUV also carried Eh, optical backscatter, and magnetometer sensors.
The 200 kHz multibeam used in 2009 produced 256 1°× 1° beams across a 135° swath, and the 400 kHz sonars used in 2016 produced 512 1°× 0.5° beams across a 165° swath (though generally about a 140° swath is achieved in volcanic terrain). A 1°× 1° beam at nadir corresponds to a 0.7 m diameter footprint from a 50 m altitude, and the footprints spread out larger toward the outer swath, yielding an average resolution scale of about 1 m. Following tidal correction, the repeatable bathymetric vertical precision is 0.1 m.
MBARI mapping AUV realtime navigation derives from a Kearfott SeaDevil inertial navigation system (INS) which integrates a 24 cm ring laser gyro, accelerometers, and a 300 kHz Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) through an embedded Kalman filter. The INS is initialized by GPS at the surface and aided during descent by a Sonardyne ultra short baseline (USBL) acoustic tracking system with position fixes transmitted to the vehicles by acoustic telemetry. The INS achieves a position accuracy of 0.05% of distance traveled as long as DVL bottom lock is maintained. In cases where the AUV altitude becomes too small (typically in rugged terrain), the propeller shuts off and the AUV floats up to a safe altitude before resuming the mission. Often DVL lock is lost during these altitude abort events, resulting in discrete jumps in INS positioning that can be in excess of 100 m, resulting in degradation of the mission navigation.
The AUV survey on the eastern slope of the axial graben was designed to cover the Sea Cliff site with a diagonal crossing line and to survey parallel to the slope, starting at the top of the slope (Figure 2). This design was to minimize altitude aborts by having all slope-parallel lines end with a turn away from the slope. The steep terrain nevertheless resulted in multiple altitude aborts and loss of DVL bottom lock despite this planning. The combination of steep terrain and altitude aborts led to multiple gaps in coverage and to areas, including the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site, with degraded coverage.
Multibeam Data Processing
The mapping data were processed using the open source MB-System software package (http://www.mbari.org/data/mbsystem/;
The multibeam bathymetry were gridded at 1-m resolution using an algorithm that incorporates the variable beam footprints. Multibeam backscatter maps were constructed by correcting the snippet backscatter samples for grazing angle using the three-dimensional topographic model and the average variation of amplitude with grazing angle for the entire survey.
The outlines of the 1996 lava flows were drawn in GIS to surround flow morphologies in the AUV maps while incorporating dive observation and sample locations from the one ROV Jason dive in 1996 and from MBARI ROV Tiburon dives T885 and T886 in 2005 (Yeo et al., 2013). The 1996 ROV ATV sample locations were poorly constrained and were not utilized. The location of the Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent site was re-determined based on navigation of ROV Tiburon T695–698 in 2004 and T884 in 2005, which had the best navigation of the MBARI dives.
Geochemical Data
Compositions of glasses collected during cruises in 1983, 1985, 1986, 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2005 (
TABLE 1
| T186-R2 | T186-R3 | T186-R6 | ||
| Oxide/Element | Unit | Silica Crust | Inactive Chimney | Massive Barite |
| SiO2 | % | 84.73 | 81.29 | 7.75 |
| Al2O3 | % | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.11 |
| MnO | % | 0.011 | 0.023 | 0 |
| MgO | % | 0.88 | 2.94 | 0.04 |
| CaO | % | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| Na2O | % | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| K2O | % | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| TiO2 | % | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| P2O5 | % | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0 |
| Fe | % | 1.27 | 1.48 | 0.058 |
| Cu | % | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| Pb | % | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.76 |
| Zn | % | 0.19 | 0.34 | 2.58 |
| Ba | % | 3.2 | 3 | 48.1 |
| Sulfide | % | 1.91 | 1.76 | 1.87 |
| Sulfate | % | 3.74 | 3.88 | 35.52 |
| LOI – Sulfide | % | 4.55 | 5.55 | 2.09 |
| C | % | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Cl | % | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Total | % | 101.39 | 99.14 | 99.91 |
| Br | ppm | 8.1 | 16.8 | 5.2 |
| Ag | ppm | 16.7 | 9.8 | 137 |
| As | ppm | 217 | 271 | 135 |
| Au | ppb | 561 | 922 | 1310 |
| Bi | ppm | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cd | ppm | 15.7 | 19.9 | 122 |
| Co | ppm | 14.5 | 10.6 | 4.9 |
| Cr | ppm | 10.8 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Ge | ppm | 1.3 | 1.4 | 7.2 |
| Hg | ppm | 8 | 20 | 12 |
| Mo | ppm | 19 | 12 | 110 |
| Ni | ppm | 9 | 9 | 1 |
| Sb | ppm | 3.3 | 2.9 | 61.9 |
| Se | ppm | 18 | 15.3 | 87.7 |
| Tl | ppm | 74.4 | 192 | 6.39 |
| Ga | ppm | 6 | 5 | 55 |
| Hf | ppm | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.7 |
| Nb | ppm | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Sc | ppm | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
| Sr | ppm | 1014 | 1190 | 4802 |
| Zr | ppm | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| U | ppm | 9.56 | 10.54 | 0.32 |
| La | ppm | 0.84 | 0.65 | 2.76 |
| Ce | ppm | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.9 |
| Pr | ppm | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.9 |
| Nd | ppm | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| Sm | ppm | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Eu | ppm | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 |
| Gd | ppm | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.51 |
| Dy | ppm | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0 |
| Ho | ppm | 0.01 | 0 | 0 |
| Er | ppm | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0 |
| Tm | ppm | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Yb | ppm | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Lu | ppm | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Composition of hydrothermal samples from sea cliff vent field.
LOI, loss on ignition.
Three samples of deposits from the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site were analyzed at ActLabs using a variety of techniques that are outlined in Paduan et al. (2019), which also includes analyses of standards and analytical precision and accuracy. The analytical data (Table 1) are for a fragment from an inactive chimney, a silica-rich crust, and a barite-rich crust.
Results
The 1996 Eruption Site
The 1996 flow boundaries were mapped by
FIGURE 3

Map of 1996 lava flows with flow extent from Yeo et al. (2013) as red outline. Blue lines are tracks of ROV Tiburon dives T885 and T886 (
FIGURE 4

Video framegrabs from dive T885; images B, D, and F are 2–3 m across and A, C, and E are 4–5 m across. (A) Contact showing black 1996 lava pillows (upper left) on top of slightly altered and sediment-covered older flow (lower right). Image taken at 3058 m depth at 42.686030°, –126.780538°. (B) Elongate 1996 pillow lavas with thin yellow-brown hydrothermal deposits. Photo taken 9 years after the eruption. Image taken at 3052 m depth at 42.686072°, –126.7804625°. (C) Upper surface of northern pillow mound with vertical to overhanging scarp to left. Image taken at 3053 m depth at 42.685767°, –126.7795013°. (D) Pillow talus at base of scarp with scattering of glass shards produced when pillow fragments fall down scarp and glass rinds spall off. Image taken at 3115 m depth at 42.683628°, –126.781378°. (E) Lavacicles found on top of talus at base of vertical scarp. These form as molten lava cascades over the scarp and drip as vertical cylinders of lava. Image taken at 3101 m depth at 42.685471°, –126.779523°. (F) Lavacicles showing teardrop shapes formed at bottom of lavacicles. Some lavacicles have slightly bent ends showing that they were still plastic when they fell to the talus slope. Image taken at 3101 m depth at 42.685447°, –126.779418°.
The hummocky flows erupted in 1996 form composite pillow mounds with near-vertical outer upper margins (Figure 4C) and extensive talus deposits at the base of the steep to vertical slopes. Talus deposits have a distinctive smooth texture on sloping topography in the AUV data (
Twelve lava samples identified by Rubin et al. (1998) as 1996 flow samples were collected during the three 1996 event response cruises. Fifteen additional samples (8 Rocks and 7 Glass Suction samples identified as 1996 flow samples (Supplementary Table S1) were collected during two 2005 MBARI ROV dives and are plotted on Figure 3. Many of the ROV ATV samples identified by Rubin et al. (1998) as 1996 flow samples are located significantly outside the mapped flow margins. Of the seven ATV178 samples only ATV178-7R and ATV178-1R1 are unequivocally established as 1996 flow samples by 210Po-210Pb dating (Rubin et al., 1998) and mis-identification of samples as 1996 lavas is possible, but poor navigation of the ATV dive is a more likely explanation for the plotted positions. The 1996 lavas are normal-MORB (N-MORB with average K2O/TiO2 = 0.079, MgO in glass between 7.87 and 8.65% (average of 8.27%), and with relatively high Na2O content, averaging ∼2.8%. The variability is significantly greater than precision of the analyses; the analyses from Rubin et al. (1998) average 0.18% higher MgO than those from
Pre-1996 lava flow compositions (MgO, K2O/TiO2, and Na2O) of samples collected within the axial valley and lavas with 1996 flow compositions are plotted as function of latitude (Figure 5). Along the ridge, MgO content (Figure 5A), an indicator of degree of fractionation, varies from∼7% to 8.8%, although almost half that range is displayed by the 1996 flow samples. At the southern end of the study area, all samples have > 7.9% MgO. The K2O/TiO2, an indicator of enrichment, varies from 0.06 to 0.16, so includes N-MORBs with ratios < 0.10 and T-MORBS with ratios > 0.10 (Figure 5B). The 1996 lava flows are N-MORB with similar K2O/TiO2 to surrounding older lava flows. The 1996 samples have a narrow range of Na2O values (Figure 5C) that is roughly the analytical uncertainty. The 1996 flows and the older flows surrounding them have a similar range of values. Most of the southernmost samples (dive T187) have low Na2O (< ∼2.4%) whereas the samples from the rest of the study area have higher Na2O (generally >2.5%).
FIGURE 5

Lava geochemistry as a function of latitude for samples collected from the axial valley and divided into 1996 flow samples and older flow samples. (A) MgO, (B) K2O/TiO2 with values < 0.10 classified as N-MORB and values > 0.10 classified as T-MORB, (C) Na2O.
The site of a proposed more southerly 1996 flow (
A 4.5-km Transect Across and East of the Axis
Sampling and observations were made on a cross section of the ridge near 42°45′N, extending ∼4.5 km from the center of the axial graben up the eastern flank of the ridge centered on the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site (Rona et al., 1990; Von Damm et al., 2006). One AUV survey mapped this area, establishing high-resolution bathymetry of the axial graben and major fault blocks to the east (Figure 6A). A profile of the ridge was constructed (Line X-X′ in Figures 6B,C) from the AUV 1-m bathymetry and, farther to the east, from a hull-mounted multibeam EM300 (MBARI Mapping Team, 2001) and EM302 collected in 2019 during Ocean Exploration Trust’s R/V Nautilus cruise NA108.
FIGURE 6

(A) Maps and interpretations of a transect across the narrowest, shallowest part of the North Gorda segment east beyond the Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent field. All maps are rotated 23°clockwise and at the same scale. AUV bathymetry is shown on top of Simrad EM300 and EM302 bathymetry. (B) Locations of lava samples are indicated on faded bathymetry from map A, with symbols as in Figure 2. Sea Cliff hydrothermal field is within the box outlining the location of Figure 8 and the newly discovered Apollo field is the white star. Line labeled X-X′ is the location of the cross section in panel C. Three NNE-SSW purple lines labeled 2, 16, and 58 are the locations of sub-bottom seismic profiles in Supplementary Figure S2. Blue line is the estimated center of the axial graben (labeled A in panel C), and used to measure distance that samples are located off-axis in Figure 7. Linework shows inward-facing fault scarps in black, outward-facing fault scarps in red, fissures in yellow, and a pair of north- and south-facing scarps in green and blue. The numbers 7, 51, and 128 show the ages (in kyr) and locations of three lava samples dated by 238U/230Th disequilibria (Goldstein et al., 1991). Track of ROV Tiburon dive T454 is labeled. (C) Profile across the North Gorda segment, constructed from AUV survey data (red line) and Simrad EM300 ship data (brown line) to the east of the AUV survey, along the cross-section X to X′ in panel B. The profile has 2.5X vertical exaggeration and extends from ∼ 1 km west of the axis to 3 km east of the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site. Normal faults with 30–70 m vertical offsets are indicated by vertical black lines. Boundary between A and Bw (green vertical line) is where a major-offset fault should occur (to mirror the eastern blocks) but only a cluster of small offset faults are observed. The fault blocks labeled Dw, Cw, Bw, A, Be, Ce, De, Ee, and Fe from west (w) to east (e) are labeled.
The bathymetric data show numerous faults, which we have subdivided into major faults based on their having 30–70 m of throw, to minor faults with smaller vertical offsets. Both types are mapped in Figure 6B, which shows the complexity of the faulting. The faults are mostly normal faults with the downthrown side toward the axis, as expected. However, a few small-offset normal faults have the opposite throw. Such faults especially occur in a zone southeast of the axis and northwest of the cross-section (Line X-X′ in Figure 6B). Major faults with larger throw or clusters of faults with larger combined vertical offsets are identified in the cross section of Figure 6C.
The major faults nearest the axis are asymmetrical. The first major fault east of the axis (between fault blocks A and Be in Figure 6C) has no single counterpart west of the axis with a similar throw. On closer inspection, the axial graben includes the unfaulted neovolcanic zone (through which the blue line is drawn in Figure 6B), symmetrically increasingly faulted flows away from that zone (which are included in the block labeled A in Figure 6C), and an inferred block, Bw to the west. The similar appearance of block Be to Bw, supported by the matching morphology of the eastern and western blocks of C and D, suggests the counterpart to Bw is the uplifted fault block Be, despite its being at a similar depth to the axial zone A. The overall faulting balances out over longer time periods, however, as there are blocks with similar structures and depths as Ee and Fe beyond the AUV coverage west of the axis (Figure 2) and the total accumulated rift valley depth is equal on both sides (Figure 2). This suggests the asymmetry may shift over time. Furthermore, the axis has a slight shift to the west in the shallow area (Figures 1, 6A). This shift is accommodated by the major faults that define a series of ridge-parallel blocks that step up from the axis and are between 350 m to 1750 m wide (blocks Ce and Ee, respectively, Figure 6C). Block Be and its inferred western counterpart Bw differ in width by about a factor of two, whereas blocks Ce and Cw are similar in width. Without high-resolution data farther to the NW, comparisons of blocks NW and SE of the axis are less reliable as the smaller faults are not detected in the lower-resolution ship data.
The bathymetric data (Figure 6A) also show a marked smoothing of the bathymetry on the fault blocks more distal from the axis. AUV sub-bottom profile data (Supplementary Figure S2) show that the easternmost block Ee (line 2 on Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure S2A) above the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site is buried by up to 0.005 s two-way travel time (TWTT) of sediment, or ∼5 m, which is consistent with ROV Tiburon dive T454 observations (Figure 6B) of complete burial of the lava flows. Continuing west toward the axis, block De (line 16 on Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure S2B) just below the Sea Cliff site is buried by up to 0.002–0.003 s TWTT of sediment, or ∼2–3 m. Block Be has no detected sediment in the sub-bottom records (A on Figure 6C). Continuing west, away from the axis, fault block Cw (Figure 6C) has up to 0.003 s TWTT of sediment (line 58 on Figure 6B and Supplementary Figure S2C) or 3 m, similar to that on block De just below Sea Cliff.
There are also differences in the flow morphology of the fault blocks progressing away from the axis (Figure 6A). A, Bw and Be have abundant small, hummocky flows. Ponded channelized flows are found only on block A. Fault blocks Cw and Ce are more fractured than A, Bw and Be, and consist of low-relief hummocky flows dissected by faults. Block Ee, east of the steep flows truncated by the fault that Sea Cliff lies on, is even smoother due to the thick sediment cover, although several small steep hummocky flows constructed of pillow lava with summit collapse craters can still be identified.
Three samples from this transect were dated using 238U/230Th disequilibrium (Goldstein et al., 1991) and are plotted on Figure 6B. A MORB sample from block Be, dredged 0.7 ± 0.3 km from the axis center (dredge L585NC-13), yielded an age of 7 ± 10 ka. A second MORB sample from near the western margin of block Ee, dredged 2.7 ± 0.1 km from the axis center [L585NC-7; labeled 85-7 in Supplementary Table S1)] yielded an age of 51 ± 12 ka. This age is significantly younger than the 98 ± 4 ka age predicted based on half-spreading rate and the sample is from a shallower portion of block Ee with thinner sediment cover (NE end of line 2 in Supplementary Figure S2). A third MORB sample from the distal part of block Ee was dredged 3.9 ± 0.4 km from the axis center (L585NC-4) and yielded an age of 128 ± 13 ka, within error of the predicted age of 142 ± 16 ka based on the half-spreading rate. Combining this age and the roughly 5 m of sediment on block Ee observed on dive T454 to the south (Figure 6B) suggests a sediment accumulation rate of ∼3.9 cm/kyr, less than the 5–14 cm/kyr estimated for the Holocene in Escanaba Trough (Karlin and Zierenberg, 1994).
Lava samples were collected along this transect as a combination of dredged rocks from 21 sites (
FIGURE 7

Geochemistry of samples from east side of axial valley projected onto cross section in Figure 6C. Distance is from the center of the axial graben. Dredge samples from
In summary, the youngest axial lavas include more fractionated and more primitive samples than the flank, and many of them also are T-MORBs not seen on the flank closer than ∼4 km from the axis. The most distal, presumably oldest samples include more enriched T-MORB compositions, but have a narrow range of fractionation with neither strongly fractionated nor primitive compositions. In addition, the most depleted and the most enriched MORBs (highest and lowest K2O/TiO2) from the Gorda Ridge north of Escanaba Trough are from opposite sides of the axis (
Sea Cliff Hydrothermal Site
An AUV mapping survey in 2016 added 1-m bathymetry over the Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent field. Here we present new details about the geologic setting of the Sea Cliff vents based on the AUV mapping, an improved map of the vent field and high- and low-temperature deposits (Figure 8), new observations from the ROV Tiburon dives (Figure 9), and three new bulk analyses of the deposits (Supplementary Table S2).
FIGURE 8

Map of the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site based on dive observations from dive T884 in 2005. All video annotations are shown as small black dots, and observations of Ridgeia piscesae tube worms (red dots), blue ciliate mat (blue dots), hydrothermal chimneys (gold squares), and markers deployed on 2000 and 2002 dives (green squares) shown. The symbols are the location of the ROV when a specific feature was observed in the video, so a single feature can result in multiple observations. Locations of video framegrabs in Figure 9 are labeled, as are site markers. The S “marker” is two Sea Cliff submersible steel plate dive weights located about 2 m apart. The cluster of video annotations on the –2740 m contour are an area with abundant brooding octopuses.
FIGURE 9

Video framegrabs of features at the Sea Cliff hydrothermal vent field. Images A, B, D, and F are ∼2–3 m across and images C and E are ∼5–10 m across. Locations are indicated on Figure 8. (A) Active anhydrite/saponite/amorphous silica chimney. Clear venting fluid is ∼305°C. Image taken at 2721 m depth at 42.754725°, –126.709302°. (B) Chimneys are aligned in an upslope-downslope array along crests of low ridges of collapsed chimney fragments. Image taken at –2718 m at 42.754501°, –126.709152°. (C) View looking upslope along the low-relief ridge of chimney debris with small chimneys along crest. Image taken at 2728 m depth at 42.754513°, –126.709544°. (D) Area with abundant Ridgeia piscesae tube worm clumps on hydrothermal crust over talus blocks. Image taken at 2700 m depth at 42.754406°, –126.709066°. (E) Scattered clumps of Ridgeia piscesae tube worms among talus blocks. Sediment partly buries the talus blocks. Image taken at 2694 m depth at 42.754844°, –126.708510°. (F) Mats of blue ciliate Eufolliculina caerulea (Pasulka et al., 2017) and white limpets Lepidodrilus fucensis on low-temperature hydrothermal crusts composed dominantly of amorphous silica, although barite-rich crusts are also present. Image taken at 2716 m depth at 42.754437°, –126.709246°.
Of the 11 ROV Tiburon dives at the Sea Cliff site, six in 2000 and 2002 suffered from poor navigation and four in 2004 did limited exploration beyond the immediate area of active venting. Observations from dive T884 in 2005 were therefore used to construct the new map of the vent field. Vent animal communities and vent locations observed during dives T685-T688 in 2004 are consistent with locations based on T884 observations, adding confidence to the location and extent of the vent field and its surrounding biologic footprint. The early dives collected fluids (Von Damm et al., 2006) from active vents located adjacent to markers deployed in the 2000 and 2002 dives. The vent field is centered at 2720 ± 10 m and the axial depth directly dowslope from the vent field ranges from 2983 to 3108 m, so Sea Cliff is ∼330 ± 60 m above the average depth of the axis. The location of the vent field is roughly 120 m south and 45 m east of the locations shown in Rona et al. (1990), which is remarkable considering that the three Sea Cliff submersible dives that discovered and explored the vent field in 1988 lacked GPS navigation and lost the transponder signals when it was near the bottom.
The volcanic axis, as defined in the previous section, is the eastern 2/3 of the axial graben (blue line on Figure 6B), and the vent field is ∼2.6 km east of the center of the volcanic axis. At a 5.5 cm/yr full spreading rate, the ocean crust under the vent field should be slightly less than 100 kyr old, as noted in Von Damm et al. (2006). The ridge-parallel fault immediately above Sea Cliff vent field has the largest throw of the many ridge-parallel faults on the east side of the volcanic axis (Figures 6B,C). Outcrops above the Sea Cliff site are volcanic breccia (Rona et al., 1990) and most of the vent field is among talus blocks and fragments of pillow lavas. It appears that the breccia is impermeable, except where isolated fractures occur. Small amounts of warm hydrothermal fluids seep through, as evidenced by the presence of abundant mollusks along the fractures. It is possible that the breccia prevents most of the fluids from migrating upslope in the subsurface. They then may rise to the surface in the Sea Cliff field.
The vent field (Figure 8) includes several rows of active anhydrite/amorphous silica/Mg-rich clay chimneys (Von Damm et al., 2006) oriented up-down slope (Figures 9A,B). These chimneys are perched atop low ridges (Figure 9C) of collapsed chimney debris, as the chimneys are fragile and collapse before they grow taller than a few m. The ridges and chimneys are noticeably devoid of vent fauna, but large areas more distant from the active high-temperature chimneys have broad, dense clumps of Ridgeia piscesae tube worms (Figure 9D). Even more distant from the active chimneys, Ridgeia piscesae become scattered clumps in fields of talus blocks (Figure 9E). The extent of the tube worm clumps is ∼140 m by ∼90 m, elongate parallel to the axis. The nearest vent fauna to the active chimneys are mats (Figure 9F) of blue ciliate Eufolliculina caerulea (Pasulka et al., 2017), and white limpets Lepidodrilus fucensis on hydrothermal crusts consisting mainly of amorphous silica and clays or of barite.
Nineteen samples of the hydrothermal chimneys and crusts were collected during the 11 ROV Tiburon dives in 2000, 2002, and 2005. Many of these samples are remarkably similar so only three representative samples were analyzed. These analyses of an inactive chimney, a silica-rich crust and a massive barite crust (Table 1) reflect the paucity of sulfides of Fe (0.58–1.48 wt%), Cu (0.15–0.26 wt%), Zn (0.19–2.58 wt%), and Pb (0.01–0.76 wt%). The samples contain 9.8–135 ppm Ag and 561–1310 ppb Au, with the barite crust having the highest Au and Ag. Anhydrite, which forms a major component of the active chimneys, has dissolved from the inactive chimney, leaving behind mainly amorphous silica as seen in the 81.3–84.7% SiO2 of the silica-rich crust and inactive chimney fragment as described by Zierenberg et al. (1995) and Von Damm et al. (2006). The chimney fragment with 2.94% MgO has more abundant Mg-rich clay than the silica crust with only 0.88% MgO.
Chondrite normalized REE (McDonough and Sun, 1995) from the collapsed chimney and silica crust (Figure 10 and Table 1) match the pattern of hydrothermal fluids, whereas REE concentrations of northern Gorda Ridge basalts (
FIGURE 10

Chondrite-normalized rare earth patterns for Sea Cliff hydrothermal deposits (green and red symbols, from Table 1), hydrothermal fluids (black dots, from Fowler et al., 2019) and a range of patterns for North Gorda basalt samples (Xs, from
Hummocky Flows of Pillow Lava
The most abundant flow morphology on the northern Gorda Segment are hummocky flows of pillows that form mounds smaller than ∼200 m in diameter and usually < 100 m tall. The tallest are almost 150 m tall and the smallest are < 25 m across. Such hummocky flows are abundant within the axial graben and on the fault blocks mapped east and west of the axis, and the 1996 lava flows consist of three such mounds. Within the mapped 35 km2 area, there are hundreds of hummocky flows forming isolated mounds or chains of mounds. Many have faults and fissures cutting them, especially away from the axis. Some hummocky flows have some special attributes, described below.
Steep-Sided Hummocky Flows Surrounded by Talus
Talus like that observed at the base of steep-sided pillow mounds that comprise the 1996 flows is a common landform around most steep-sided mounds along the ridge axis. Talus covers 1.57 km2 of the 26.2 km2 of axial graben mapped by AUVs, or 6% by area. The extent of such deposits is illustrated in Figure 11 and contrasted with talus deposits along steep fault scarps. Calculations done in ArcGIS on the shapefiles of talus deposits indicate talus at the base of steep-sided cones and volcanic ridges comprises ∼4.6% of the axial graben floor and is far more common than talus along fault scarps, which covers just ∼0.8% of the axial valley (the remaining 0.6% could be either along faults or at the base of steep cones). Additional talus is produced along ridge-parallel faults off-axis, and small, rare, talus slopes may form due to faulting that cuts hummocky flows soon after their formation. As blocks are faulted during uplift outside the axial graben, fault-related talus increases. Lavacicles were not observed in any of these other talus deposits.
FIGURE 11

Map showing the distributions of syn-eruptive talus and talus along fault scarps in the axial graben. Talus around the 1996 flow contains lavacicle fragments formed during the eruption as lava cascaded over near-vertical scarps (location marked with white star). This constructional talus forms a sloping surface around the base of steep-sided hummocky flows and constitutes the majority of talus in the mapped area. Talus accumulated at the base of fault scarps is also shown, as are some talus deposits that could be either constructional or fault-related. Map is rotated 23°counterclockwise.
Hummocky Flows With Summit Collapses
In the entire AUV-mapped region there are just four hummocky flows (three 150–200 m across and one 100 m across) that have summit collapse pits. These are in a north-south row east of the southern part of the extensive ponded channelized flow described below (cc on Figure 12B). Hummocky flows with summit craters are common on Axial Seamount, including some that formed in 2015 (
FIGURE 12

(A) Map showing the distribution of ponded channelized flows. At least three eruptions produced ponded channelized flows in the axis (outlined by red lines), each with two or more separate flows. The locations of Figures 12B, 13A,B are shown as white boxes. (B) The four northern flows were sampled twice during Sea Cliff dive 771 (Rona et al., 1990) and by three rock cores (
Ponded Channelized Flows
The AUV maps reveal channelized flows (Figures 12A,B) with ponded and drained sheet flow morphology as described based on AUV data in
The ponded channelized flows on North Gorda cover 0.79 km2 of 26.2 km2 of the axis mapped by the AUVs or 3.0% of the axial graben. The four northern channelized flows on North Gorda may have formed during a single eruption, as their lake levels are similar (Figure 12B). They are relatively undisrupted by faults and fissures, although one fault, downthrown to the east by 2.7–9 m (greater offset to the north), cuts the eastern edge of the flows (f on Figure 12B). In addition, rare linear fissures cut through the ponded flows. The drained ponds are 3–11 m deep (dp on Figures 13C,D), and the shallowest one has numerous lava pillars near its margin (p on Figure 13D). The combined volume is < 0.06 km3, and much of that volume eventually drained out and the ponds collapsed, leaving the original lava lake surface as bath-tub rings against adjacent flows (ll in Figures 13C,D). The shapes of the bath-tub rings mirror the shapes of the mounds they ponded against, so relative ages can be established. The ponded flows are younger than almost all surrounding flows, except the southern-most flow (Figure 13C) where hummocky flows (hfy) over-rode the surface of the lava lake. Talus has predated and postdated the lakes (to and ty, respectively, on Figure 13D). Despite their relative youth, they are still older than several hundreds of years as deduced from observations of sediment cover and sessile animal abundance during Sea Cliff dive 771 in 1988 (Rona et al., 1990) and USGS camera tows collected in 1985–1986 (Figure 3.13 in
FIGURE 13

(A) The central two small flows ponded between older hummocky flows and are of unknown age. The sampled (RC14) southern one is chemically and mineralogically distinct from the northern flows in Figure 12B. (B) The southern flows also ponded between older hummocky flows. The location of the close-up view of this flow remnant shown in Figure 13C is indicated by the white box. Color ramp for A and B is blue = −3170 m and orange = −2970 m. (C) Small remnants of a ponded channelized flow that filled in between older hummocky flows (hfo) to east and west. The drained pond (dp) is partially filled in by younger hummocky flows (hfy) from both the north and south. The margins of the pond record the original lake level (ll). Color ramp is blue = –3165 m to orange = –3130 m, white is shallower than –3130 m. (D) Close-up view of the largest ponded channelized flow, showing the drained pond (dp) with lava pillars (p) near the margins, and the original lake level (ll) that formed as a levee adjacent to older hummocky flows (hfo). Talus emplaced prior to the pond on the flank of a hummocky flow (hfo) to the east is labeled to, whereas talus that fell later and covers a portion of the lava pond levee is labeled ty. Color ramp of blue = –3080 m to orange = –3040m. Maps A to D are all rotated counterclockwise 23°.
This largest flow (Figure 12B) was sampled as R1 and R3 during Sea Cliff dive 771 and by three wax-tip rock cores in 2000 (GR00-RC11, RC17, and RC18) using ship-based bathymetry to guide the core deployment. These five samples have statistically identical T-MORB compositions (
Sample GR00-RC14 (
ROV video during dive T885 imaged a lobate flow with a collapsed channel just NW of the northernmost 1996 hummocky flow. The drained channel displayed a series of lava shelves formed as the channel drained. This drained lobate flow and the channel collapse are too small to identify in the AUV maps. However, it demonstrates that fluid channelized flows erupted over a larger region than identified from the AUV maps.
High-Volume Volcanic Structures
Almost all channelized and hummocky flows have volumes that are estimated at < 0.05 km3, like the 1996 flows. Several volcanic structures, however, are estimated to have volumes 3–5 times larger. These high-volume structures formed during long-duration moderate effusion-rate eruptions, not high enough rates to form channelized flows, but higher than eruptions forming steep hummocky flows. The high-volume constructs are located near the southern end of the mapped area, south of the 1996 lava flows (Figure 14A), within the axial graben. The southwestern one (Figure 14C) is similar to, but not as flat-topped nor as steep sided as, flat-topped volcanic cones (
FIGURE 14

(A) Regional view of inflated hummocky flow, flat-topped cone, and large-volume elongate ridge at southern end of the surveyed area. Color ramp of blue = –3400 m to orange = –2800 m. (B) Same area with blue outlines of flat-topped cone (C) and inflated hummocky flow (D), and green outline of elongate ridge. Linework of faults showing that they bend eastward around northern inflated hummocky flow. The elongate ridge has abundant syneruptive talus on its lower slopes. Red boxes show the extents of maps in C and D. (C) Summit of flat-topped cone showing cross-cutting fissures, tumuli, channels and small drained lava ponds around a shallow central depression. (D) Close-up of two of seven pit craters on the complex inflated hummocky flow. The pit craters cross-cut some hummocky flow mounds, and younger hummocky flow mounds (north end of southwest crater) bury the ring fault bounding the crater. Both C and D have color ramp of blue = –3225 m to orange = –3075 m.
A second high-volume structure is an inflated hummocky flow (nomenclature from
A third voluminous structure is an elongate volcanic ridge (green outline in Figure 14B) that is oriented parallel to the axis and is surrounded by abundant talus (see Figure 11). It is located south of the inflated hummocky flow and east of the flat-topped cone. This ridge has a similar estimated volume of 0.25 km3 but formed during a different style of long-duration low-effusion rate eruption, similar to the 1996 hummocky flows. It was sampled by a wax-tip rock core GR00RC7 that recovered glass chips with three distinct compositions, making it uncertain which, if any, represents the underlying ridge and which are pyroclastic glass shards deposited on top of the cone (
A fourth voluminous structure, mapped using a ship-based EM300 (MBARI Mapping Team, 2001) and EM302 (Ocean Exploration Trust cruise NA108) multibeams, is a flat-topped cone at the southern end of dive T187 (Supplementary Figure S1). It is ∼1.4 × 1.2 km in diameter at the base and the flat top is ∼700 by 900 m across. The cone is ∼180 m tall (250 m maximum), covers 1.89 km2, and has a rough volume of 0.23 km3. Dive T187 recovered six N-MORB samples from the north side of the cone with MgO = 8.5–8.78% and K2O/TiO2 = 0.082 to 0.092.
Discussion
The 1996 Eruption and Lava Flows
The 1996 eruption produced three hummocky flows with a volume of just 0.007 km3 spread along eruption fissures that extended 1.3 km with gaps of 0.3 and 0.8 km between the three hummocks (Yeo et al., 2013). The hypothesized southern flow located five km south of the southern of the three confirmed 1996 hummocks (Supplementary Figure S1;
One result of such a slow eruption rate is that the hummocky flows are extremely steep-sided pillow mounds, shaped like haystacks. The mounds were so steep that advancing pillow flows broke off to form talus blocks of pillow fragments. As the top of the mound grew upwards, lava poured over the margin of the mound and cascaded vertically down to the talus slope below forming lavacicles, first observed here. They form in a manner analogous to lava stream “firehose” flow from truncated tubes at ocean-entries observed on Kilauea Volcano during the Pu’u O’o eruption (Hawaiian Volcano Observatory, 2017). The lava was rapidly quenched in the cold bottom seawater, but many lavacicles were still plastic when they landed as one end is commonly bent (Figure 4F). The lavacicles are an extreme form of “elephant trunk” lava morphology and more elongate than those reported from the 2011 Axial south rift pillow ridge (
The 1996 flows are geochemically heterogeneous N-MORB (Figure 5) with MgO content from ∼7.8 to 8.6%, Na2O content from ∼2.7 to 2.95%, and K2O/TiO2 from ∼0.07 to 0.09, but overlap in composition with other prior lava flows erupted in the same portion of the North Gorda segment (
Variations Along Axis in the Axial Graben
The petrogenesis of the lavas along the North Gorda Segment was described in
The Cross-Section to the East of the Axis
As expected, but rarely demonstrated, the fault blocks have thicker sediment cover away from the axis. Sediment thickness (as indicated by bottom smoothness in the multibeam bathymetry, sub-bottom seismic lines, and direct observations) appears to increase in steps defined by wide fault blocks (Be, Ce, De, Ee, and Fe on Figure 6). The 230Th/238U disequilibrium ages (Goldstein et al., 1991) increase in age with increasing distance from the center of the axis, although sample 85-7 at 51 kyr (from the inner part of block Ee) is half that expected from the spreading rate and distance to the axis. Even if the flows erupted along the eastern margin of an axial block the same width as block A (Figure 6C), this flow is still too young by ∼35 ka. The area has not been directly observed, but the steep hummocky flows also have less sediment than the southwestern part of the same fault block (Supplementary Figure S2A). This may be a site of off-axis volcanism, as documented elsewhere along the MOR (e.g., Reynolds and Langmuir, 2000). However, the volcanic activity, if it occurred off-axis, still took place 51 ± 12 ka ago (Goldstein et al., 1991) and is therefore not the current source of heat driving the off-axis hydrothermal activity at the Sea Cliff site.
The Sea Cliff hydrothermal site is located on the off-axis fault with the largest throw. The site is not located at the intersection of two cross-cutting fault systems as originally proposed by Rona and Clague (1989) and Rona et al. (1990). The same geological setting was also proposed for the TAG hydrothermal field on the MAR (Rona, 1988; Karson and Rona, 1990), but the concept of cross-cutting faults localizing fluid flow has also been supplanted there (
The increasing thickness of sediment cover off-axis that we have documented at North Gorda segment may also seal the crust on these older off-axis fault blocks, forcing fluid flow along the faults. The sediment also buries and subdues the fine-scale topography of volcanic features in this high-sediment-rate region (∼5–6 cm/kyr) and crust as young as perhaps 50 kyr has 2–3 m of sediment, which may be enough to seal the crust.
Abundances of Different Lava Morphologies on the Intermediate-Rate North Gorda Segment
The North Gorda Segment is characterized by abundant small-volume hummocky flows. Many hummocky flow mounds can be produced during single eruptions, as occurred during the 1996 North Gorda eruption, which produced 29 pillow mounds that coalesced into just three larger composite mounds (Yeo et al., 2013). A more extreme example is the 1986 eruption on the North Cleft Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge which produced 130 mounds, coalesced into 17 ridges and composite mounds (Yeo et al., 2013). To determine which mounds are part of each eruption most likely requires sampling each mound and hoping that each eruption has a distinct composition or compositional range. Mapping historical flows soon after they erupt is the only feasible way to determine which mounds formed during single eruptions, and therefore the volume of lava erupted and the eruptive fissure length, so that eruption rates can be estimated.
The axial graben of the North Gorda Segment consists of 91% hummocky flows including a high-volume inflated hummocky flow, large elongate ridge and a flat-topped cone; 3% channelized flows that are ponded between hummocky flows; and 6% talus, with most talus formed during eruptions that formed the hummocky flows. Of the roughly 96% of the surface produced during low-rate eruptions that produce these hummocky flows, all but three eruptions were brief and produced small-volume hummocky flows comprised of pillow lava. The three largest-volume eruptions (Figure 14) each produced hummocky flows that had volumes estimated at 0.18 to 0.25 km3, but make up only 1% of the area mapped. These larger-volume eruptions occurred distal from the shallowest point on the axis. The highest eruption rate flows, the channelized flows, occurred within 5 km of the shallowest point along the segment. The largest of the channelized flows (Figure 12B) erupted < 0.06 km3, but a large portion drained back down either the eruptive fissures or older open fissures when the eruption ended, leaving areas of drained ponds (dp on Figures 12E,F) that are surrounded by hummocky flow mounds. There are also rare hummocky flows that erupted more rapidly than most hummocky flows and therefore maintained molten cores, as described for flows from the 2015 eruption at Axial Seamount (
The large-volume volcanic edifices exert structural control on the locations of faults and fissures in the axial graben. These faults and fissures bend around the eastern inflated hummocky flow with the 7 pit craters (Figure 14B) suggesting that such volcanic units form thick, coherent material that is not easily fractured during extension events, such that the faults bend to capitalize on less rigid adjacent crust.
Channelized flows, inferred from their morphology to have erupted at high rates (Griffiths and Fink, 1992; Gregg et al., 1996), are rare and geochemically within the range of melt MgO contents and crystal contents of that of the hummocky flows, including those erupted in 1996. Since viscosity in low-volatile MORBs is largely determined from melt temperature and crystal content (Shaw, 1972), their rapid eruption rates are not caused by their having lower viscosities than the hummocky flows. Their high eruption rates are therefore caused by either wider dikes or more buoyant magma (Head et al., 1996), presumably caused by higher bubble abundances. Higher bubble contents are associated with the sections of fissure that had the highest eruption rates during the 2011 eruption of channelized flows on Axial Seamount (Jones et al., 2018) and one of the samples of the ponded channelized flows on North Gorda also has abundant vesicles. This difference may have contributed to more rapid eruption of the channelized flows, but we suspect that the width of the feeder dike is the primary control on eruption rate since that rate per m of eruptive fissure increases by a factor of 1000 as a dike widens from 0.2 to 2.2 m (Table 1 in Head et al., 1996). A wider dike with higher eruption rate could occur when eruptions are less frequent, whereas a narrower dike with lower eruption rate would be consistent with more frequent eruptions. The change in frequency of eruptions does not need to vary by large amounts to result in large differences in dike width and eruption rates since eruption rate per m of fissure varies as the cube of dike width but linearly with changes in viscosity (equation 2 in Head et al., 1996).
Changes in the Sea Cliff Hydrothermal Field
Data on the vent fluid chlorinity collected in 2000, 2002, and 2004 showed a slight increase with time, but the magnitude of the increase was small enough to be within the error of individual measurements, and Von Damm et al. (2006) concluded that the fluid composition was stable over the 4-year period. A linear regression of the Von Damm et al. (2006) data indicates, however, increasing salinity with time with an r2 value of 0.71. Extrapolating this fit to the data predicts that the chlorinity of the vent fluid will have increased from an average 454 ± 2 mmol/kg Cl in 2000 to slightly > 500 mmol/kg Cl by mid-2019 and to seawater values by ∼2040. Resampling of the vents to determine fluid composition changes can test this extrapolation.
Seafloor markers were deployed where hydrothermal fluids were sampled (Von Damm et al., 2006). Comparison of photos that include the markers show that some chimneys became inactive and collapsed during the 5 years of observation and that the most active venting shifted with time.
Samples of hydrothermal crusts from the vent field collected in 1988 consisted mostly of highly altered and silicified hyaloclastite breccia (Zierenberg et al., 1995). Samples of active chimneys collected on later expeditions showed that the chimneys are dominantly composed of anhydrite with less abundant Mg-saponite, amorphous silica and minor pyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite (Von Damm et al., 2006). As the chimneys collapse, anhydrite is selectively dissolved, but evidence of its former presence is often preserved due to overgrowth and/or pseudomorphic replacement of the anhydrite by amorphous silica and saponite, as observed in sample T186-R3. This process of repeated chimney growth, collapse, and dissolution forms the low ridges that host the active vents (Figure 9C). Continued diffuse flow of hydrothermal fluid through the collapsed chimney rubble, coupled with conductive cooling, leads to further precipitation of amorphous silica forming hydrothermal silica crusts with a clastic texture that appear similar to the highly altered hyaloclastite crusts (i.e., T186-R2).
Zierenberg et al. (1995), used relatively immobile trace elements to establish the basaltic parentage of the silicified hyaloclastites. The relatively immobile rare earth elements (REE) demonstrate that much of the material in the vent field is a residual product of hydrothermal chimney collapse (Figure 10), i.e., the material formed mostly by hydrothermal precipitation, not leaching and silicification of volcaniclastites.
The North Gorda Segment Compared With Other Pacific Intermediate-Rate Ridges
The volcanic terrain along the axial zone consists mainly of hummocky flows with only rare channelized flows. Axial volcanic ridges characteristic of the slow-spreading MAR (e.g., Yeo and Searle, 2013) are absent in the axial graben, although one similar ridge occurs off-axis immediately upslope from the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site. Parameters such as axial graben width and depth at the segment center, eruption rates that produce different volcanic landforms, volumes of eruptions, and homogeneity or heterogeneity of lava compositions (as measured by Mg#, K2O/TiO2, or trace element ratios such as La/Sm) in the axis vary among the limited number of mapped and sampled Pacific intermediate-rate spreading centers (Table 2). In almost all of these parameters, the North Gorda segment is an end-member among intermediate-rate ridges in the Pacific. For example, the North Gorda axial graben at the shallowest point near the center of the segment is ∼18 km wide and ∼700 m deep, compared to 3.2 km wide and 100 m deep on the Cleft segment (Stakes et al., 2006), > 2 km wide and ∼200 m deep at the low-magma supply portion of the Galapagos Spreading Center at −94°50′ longitude (
TABLE 2
| Segment: time period or magma flux | Reference | Graben width (km) | Graben depth (m) | Channelized vs. hummocky flows | Volumes of larger hummocky flows | Chemical variability |
| Lower magma supply | ||||||
| N. Gorda: recent | This paper | 15 | 700 | 97% hummocky flows | 0.1–0.3 km3 | High |
| South Cleft | Stakes et al., 2006 | 3.2 | 100 | 100% channelized flows | ND | Low |
| Galapagos: low flux | >2 | 200 | 85% hummocky flows | 0.09–1.31 km3 | High | |
| Endeavor: 0–4.3 ka | 1 | 200 | Mostly hummocky flows | ND | High | |
| Higher magma supply | ||||||
| N Gorda: 15–125 ka | This paper | NA | NA | All hummocky flows | ND | Low |
| Endeavor: > 4.3 ka | NA | NA | > 50% channelized flows | ND | Low | |
| Alarcon Rise | NA | NA | > 50% channelized flows | ND | Low | |
| Galapagos: high-flux | NA | NA | 53% channelized and lobate flows | 0.002–0.13 km3 | Low |
Intermediate-rate pacific ridge comparison.
NA, not applicable; ND, not determined.
At Pacific intermediate-rate ridges, many of the morphologic and geologic features depend largely on magma supply rates (Table 2). As magma supply can vary at similar spreading rates, eruptions also vary in magma flux, volume, and uniformity in lava composition (e.g.,
It is tempting to try to arrange all these different intermediate-rate ridges into the Kappel and Ryan (1986) model of alternating tectonic and magmatic cycles. Furthermore, the three-phase cycle of magmatism, tectonism, and hydrothermalism proposed for the Endeavor segment (
Faulting on North Gorda consists of sub-parallel normal faults with larger-throw faults spaced about 1 km apart, but with additional small-throw normal faults in between (Figure 6B). This axial structure is distinct from that at some slow spreading ridges (e.g., Smith et al., 2012;
Conclusion
The 1996 eruption on the North Gorda segment produced three small hummocky lava flows that erupted at extremely low rates, thereby producing hummocks with near-vertical margins. Flows cascading over the edge of these steep-sided hummocks produced abundant syneruptive talus and rare lavacicles when molten lava fell vertically.
Individual lava flows that construct the North Gorda crust have small volumes from 0.007 km3 for the 1996 flows to 0.25 km3 for the largest flat-topped cones and inflated hummocky flows. Lava flows with similar chemical compositions erupted at a range of rates to produce highly varied volcanic landforms. These landforms range from rapidly erupted channelized flows that ponded in the axial graben to very slowly erupted steep-sided hummocky flows like the 1996 hummocky flows. These observations indicate that dike width rather than physical lava properties or magmatic gas content is the primary control on eruption rate.
The Sea Cliff hydrothermal site is located 2.6 km east of the center of the axial graben, and 370 m above the floor of the axial graben where the graben-bounding fault with the largest throw is located. The hydrothermal system emits 305°C colorless fluids that mainly precipitate anhydrite and Mg-rich smectite, with only traces of sulfide phases. Observations in 2019 (C. German, personal communication) suggest minimal changes in the system since last observed and sampled in 2005, or since discovery in 1988. The active vent site is not located where two fault systems intersect, as proposed previously.
Sub-bottom seismic profiles and multibeam bathymetric data collected from the AUV show that sediment thickness increases with distance to the axial graben, as expected but rarely shown on such a small scale. Sediment cover close to the axis that is too thin to detect seismically smooths the bathymetry. The normal faults bounding the axial graben are asymmetrical with limited uplift on the west side of the graben compared with the east side.
Comparison with other Pacific intermediate-spreading rate ridges indicates that North Gorda, following a period of tectonic extension, may be re-entering a more magmatically robust phase with eruption of some larger-volume flows and volcanic constructs, as well as more rapidly erupted channelized flows in the axial graben.
Addition of 1-m resolution mapping data collected by AUVs enhances the value of legacy data sets and enables reinterpretation of the history of spreading and volcanism on mid-ocean ridges. A large amount of such legacy data exists along the global mid-ocean ridge system that will yield new insights if it can be placed in a high-resolution spatial framework. The only requirement is that the legacy data must be well-navigated, have features that allow co-registration with the new high-resolution mapping data, or have sampled large features.
Statements
Data availability statement
The AUV multibeam and sub-bottom seismic data can be found in the IEDA seafloor bathymetry archives.
Author contributions
DAC was chief scientist on the cruises in 2000, 2002, and 2005, managed the sample analysis and processing of the multibeam data, and wrote most of the manuscript. JP participated on the ROV dive cruises in 2002 and 2005, processed the multibeam data, prepared most of the figures, and edited the manuscript. DWC collected the AUV multibeam data and did the initial data processing. JM obtained funding for the dives at the Sea Cliff hydrothermal site, participated on the cruises in 2000 and 2002, and discussed the setting and character of the site with coauthors. RZ participated on the cruises in 2000 and 2002 and interpreted the analytical data on the hydrothermal samples.
Funding
The ROV dives at Sea Cliff site in 2000 and 2002 were supported by a grant from the West Coast NURP office of NOAA. The remaining ROV dives and collection of the AUV data were funded by a grant to the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, which also supported the salaries of DAC, JP, and DWC.
Acknowledgments
Samples and observations were collected in 2000, 2002, and 2005 during ROV Tiburon dives done from the R/V Western Flyer. The mapping AUV surveys were completed in 2009 from the R/V Zephyr and in 2016 from the R/V Rachel Carson. The dedication and skill of the captains, ships crews, ROV pilots, and AUV team at MBARI are reflected in the high-quality data available for this study. We thank Chris German and Ocean Exploration Trust for sharing regional EM302 bathymetric data collected by the R/V Nautilus during cruise NA108 in 2019. Observations from their NASA- and NOAA-funded ROV program confirm that the Sea Cliff vent field remains active in 2019 and expands the area of active vent along strike 775 m to the north with discovery of the Apollo vent field.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00027/full#supplementary-material
FIGURE S1Map of proposed southern 1996 flow (
Three ridge-parallel seismic profiles collected by the AUV mounted Edgetech FS-AU sonar 2–16 kHz chirp sub-bottom profilers showing thicker sediment on distal line 2 than more proximal line 16, which has similar sediment cover to that on line 58 on the opposite side of the axis. The locations of the lines are shown in Figure 6B with line 2 from fault block Ee, line 16 from block De, and line 58 from block Cw. The maximum sediment thickness decreases from 5 to 7 m on block Ee to 2–3 m on blocks De and Cw to undetected sediment on blocks A, Bw, and Be.
TABLE S1Microprobe glass compositions.
References
1
BakerE. T.MassothG. J.CollierR. W.TrefryJ. H.KadkoD.NelsonT. A.et al (1987). Evidence for high-temperature hydrothermal venting on the Gorda Ridge, northeast Pacific Ocean.Deep Sea Res.341461–1476. 10.1016/0198-0149(87)90137-3
2
BallardR. D.van AndelT. H. (1977). Morphology and tectonics of inner rift valley at lat 36°50’N on Mid-Atlantic Ridge.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.88507–530.
3
BideauD.HekinianR.SichlerB.GraciaE.BollingerC.ConstantinM.et al (1998). Contrasting volcanictectonic processes during the past 2Ma on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: submersible mapping, petrological and magnetic results at lat. 34°52’ N and 33°55’ N.Mar. Geophys. Res.20425–458.
4
BohrsonW. A.SperaF. J.GhiorsoM. S.BrownG. A.CreamerJ.MayfieldA. (2014). Thermodynamic model for energy-constrained open system evolution of crustal magma bodies undergoing simultaneous assimilation, recharge, and crystallization: the magma chamber simulator.J. Petrol.551685–1717. 10.1093/petrology/egu036
5
BuckW. R.LavierL. L.PoliakovA. N. B. (2005). Modes of faulting at mid-ocean ridges.Nature434719–723.
6
CanalesJ. P.SohnR. A.deMartinB. J. (2007). Crustal structure of the Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) segment (Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 26°10′N): Implications for the nature of hydrothermal circulation and detachment faulting at slow spreading ridges.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.81–18. 10.1029/2007GC001629
7
CannJ. R.SmithD. K.EscartinJ.ShoutenH. (2015). Tectonic evolution of 200 km of Mi-Atlantic ridge over 10 million years: interplay of volcanism and faulting.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.162303–2331. 10.1002/2015GC005797
8
CaressD. W.ChayesD. N. (1996). Improved processing of hydrosweep DS multibeam data on the R/V Maurice Ewing.Mar. Geophys. Res.18631–650. 10.1007/BF00313878
9
CaressD. W.ThomasH.KirkwoodW. J.McEwenR.HenthornR.ClagueD. A.et al (2008). “High-resolution multibeam, sidescan, and subbottom surveys using the MBARI AUV D. Allan B,” in Marine Habitat Mapping Technology for Alaska, edsReynoldsJ. R.GreeneH. G., (Fairbanks: University of Alaska), 47–69. 10.4027/mhmta.2008.04
10
ChadwickW. W.Jr.ClagueD. A.EmbleyR. W.PerfitM. R.ButterfieldD. A.CaressD. W.et al (2013). The 1998 eruption of Axial Seamount: new insights on submarine lava flow emplacement from high-resolution mapping.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.143939–3968. 10.1002/ggge.20202
11
ChadwickW. W.Jr.EmbleyR. W.ShanksT. M. (1998). The 1996 Gorda Ridge eruption: geologic mapping, sidescan sonar, and SeaBeam comparison results.Deep Sea Res. II452547–2569. 10.1016/s0967-0645(98)00083-6
12
ChadwickW. W.Jr.PaduanJ. B.ClagueD. A.DreyerB. M.MerleS. G.BobbittA. M.et al (2016). Voluminous eruption from a zoned magma body after and increases in supply rate at Axial Seamount.Geophys. Res. Lett., 4312:70. 10.1002/2016GL071327
13
ClagueD. A.CaressD. W.DreyerB. M.LundstenL.PaduanJ. B.PortnerR. A.et al (2018a). Geology of the Alarcon Rise, Southern Gulf of California.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.19807–837. 10.1002/2017GC007348
14
ClagueD. A.DavisA. S.DixonJ. E. (2003). “Submarine strombolian eruptions along the Gorda mid-ocean ridge,” in Explosive Subaequeous Volcanism, American Geophysical Union Monograph, edsWhiteJ. D. L.SmellieJ. L.ClagueD. A., (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley), 11–12.
15
ClagueD. A.DreyerB. M.PaduanJ. B.MartinJ. F.CaressD. W.GillJ. B.et al (2014). Eruptive and tectonic history of the Endeavour Segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge based on AUV mapping and lava flow ages.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.151–28. 10.1002/2014GC005415
16
ClagueD. A.DreyerB. M.PaduanJ. B.MartinJ. F.ChadwickW. W.Jr.CaressD. W.et al (2013). Geologic history of the summit of Axial Seamount, Juan de Fuca Ridge.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.144403–4443. 10.1002/ggge.20240
17
ClagueD. A.HolmesM. L. (1987). “Geology, petrology, and mineral potential of the Gorda Ridge,” in Geology and Resource Potential of the Continental Margin of Western North America and Adjacent Ocean Basins—Beaufort Sea to Baja California: Circum-Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, Circum-Pacific Earth Science Series, edsSchollD. W.GrantzA.VedderJ. G., (Berelin: Springer), 563–580.
18
ClagueD. A.MooreJ. G.ReynoldsJ. R. (2000). Formation of submarine flat-topped volcanic cones in Hawaii.Bull. Volcanol.62214–233. 10.1007/s004450000088
19
ClagueD. A.PaduanJ. B.CaressD. W.ChadwickW. W.Jr.Le SaoutM.DreyerB.et al (2017). High-resolution AUV mapping and targeted ROV observations of three historical lava flows at Axial Seamount.Oceanography3082–99. 10.5670/oceanog.2017.426
20
ClagueD. A.PaduanJ. B.CaressD. W.ThomasH.ChadwickW. W.Jr.MerleS. G. (2011). Volcanic morphology of West Mata Volcano, NE Lau basin, based on high-resolution bathymetry and depth changes.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.12:QOAF03. 10.1029/2011GC003791
21
ClagueD. A.PaduanJ. B.DavisA. S. (2009). Widespread strombolian eruptions of mid-ocean ridge basalt.J. Volcanol. Geother. Res.180171–188. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.08.007
22
ClagueD. A.PaduanJ. B.DreyerB. M.ChadwickW. W.Jr.RubinK. R.PerfitM. R.et al (2018b). Chemical variations in the 1998, 2011, and 2015 lava flows from Axial Seamount, Juan de Fuca Ridge: cooling during ascent, lateral transport, and flow.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.192915–2933. 10.1029/2018GC007708
23
ClagueD. A.RonaP. (1990). “Geology of the GR-14 site on the northern Gorda Ridge,” in Gorda Ridge: A frontier area in the United States Exclusive Economic Zone, ed.McMurrayG. R., (New York: Springer-Verlag), 31–50. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3258-2_3
24
ClagueD. A.ZierenbergR. A.DavisA.GoffrediS.McClainJ.MaherN.et al (2001). MBARI’s 2000 expedition to the Gorda Ridge.Newslett. U.S. Ridge Initiat.115–12.
25
ColmanA.SintonJ.WhiteS. M.McClintonJ. T.BowlesJ. A.RubinK. H.et al (2012). Effects of variable magma supply on mid-ocean ridge eruptions: constraints from mapped lava flow fields along the Galápagos Spreading Center.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.13:Q08014. 10.1029/2012GC004163
26
CowenJ. P.BakerE. T. (1998). The 1996 Gorda Ridge event detection and response activities: historical perspective and future implications.Deep Sea Res. II452503–2511.
27
DavisA. S.ClagueD. A. (1987). Geochemistry, mineralogy, and petrogenesis of lava from the Gorda Ridge between latitude 43°N and 41.4°N.J. Geophys. Res.92467–410.
28
DavisA. S.ClagueD. A. (1990). Gabbroic xenoliths from the Northern Gorda Ridge: implications for magma chamber processes under slow-spreading centers.J. Geophys. Res.95885–810.
29
DavisA. S.ClagueD. A.CousensB. L.KeatenR.PaduanJ. B. (2008). Geochemistry of basalt from the North Gorda segment of the Gorda Ridge: evolution toward ultra-slow spreading ridge lavas due to decreasing magma supply.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.9:Q04004. 10.1029/2007GC001775
30
DeMetsC.GordonR. G.ArgusD. F. (2010). Geologically current plate motions.Geophys. J. Int.1811–80. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04491.x
31
DreyerB. M.ClagueD. A.GillJ. (2013). Petrological variability of recent magmatism at Axial Seamount summit, Juan de Fuca ridge.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.144306–4333. 10.1002/ggge.20239
32
FornariD. J.TiveyM. A.SchoutenH.PerfitM. R.YoergerD.BradleyA.et al (2004). “Submarine lava flow emplacement at the East Pacific Rise 9°50’N: implications for uppermost ocean crust stratigraphy and hydrothermal fluid circulation,” in Mid-Ocean Ridges: Hydrothermal Interactions between the Lithosphere and Oceans, Geophysical Monograph Series, edsGermanC. R.LinJ.ParsonL. M., (Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union), 187–218.
33
FowlerA. P. G.ZierenbergR. A. (2015). “Rare earth element concentrations in geothermal fluids and epidote from the Reykjanes geothermal system, Iceland,” in Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourn.
34
FowlerA. P. G.ZierenbergR. A.ReedM.PalandriJ.ÓskarssonF.GunnarsonI. (2019). Rare earth element systematics in boiled fluids from basalt-hosted geothermal systems.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta244129–154. 10.1016/j.gca.2018.10.001
35
FoxC. G.DziakR. P. (1998). Hydroacoustic detection of volcanic activity on the Gorda Ridge, February-March 1996.Deep Sea Res. II452513–2530. 10.1016/s0967-0645(98)00081-2
36
FundisA. T.SouleS.FornariD. J.PerfitM. R. (2010). Paving the seafloor: Volcanic emplacement processes during the 2005–2006 eruptions at the fast spreading East Pacific Rise, 9°N.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.11:Q08024. 10.1029/2010GC003058
37
GillJ. B.MichaelsP.WoodcockJ.RamosF.DreyerB. M.ClagueD. A.et al (2016). Origins of enriched MORB at the Endeavour Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge.J. Petrol.57863–896. 10.1093/petrology/egw024
38
GoldsteinS. J.MurrelM. T.JancekyD. R.DelaneyJ. R.ClagueD. A. (1991). Geochronology and petrogenesis of young MORB from the Juan de Fuca and Gorda Ridges by 238U - 230Th disequilibrium.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.10725–41. 10.1016/0012-821x(91)90041-f
39
GreggT. K. P.FinkJ. H. (1995). Quantification of submarine lava-flow morphology through analog experiments.Geology2373–76.
40
GreggT. K. P.FornariD. J.PerctM. R.HaymonR. M.FinkJ. H. (1996). Rapid emplacement of a mid-ocean ridge lava flow on the East Pacific Rise at 9° 46°51’N.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.144E1–E7.
41
GriffithsR. W.FinkJ. H. (1992). Solidification and morphology of submarine lavas: a dependence on extrusion rate.J. Geophys. Res.9719729–19737.
42
Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (2017). Kîlauea Volcano’s Kamokuna Ocean Entry Reaches its One-Year Anniversary.Hawaii: Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.
43
HeadJ. W.Jr.WilsonL.SmithD. K. (1996). Mid-ocean ridge eruptive vent morphology and substructure: evidence for dike widths, eruptive rates, and evolution of eruptions and axial volcanic ridges.J. Geophys. Res.10128265–28280. 10.1029/96jb02275
44
HowardK. J.FiskM. R. (1988). Hydrothermal alumina-rich clays and boehmite on Gorda Ridge.Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta522269–2279. 10.1016/0016-7037(88)90129-9
45
JonesM. R.SouleS. A.GonnermannH.LeRouxV.ClagueD. A. (2018). ). Ascent and emplacement rates during the 2011 Axial Seamount eruption based on CO2 degassing.Earth Planet. Sci.49432–41. 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.044
46
KappelE. S.RyanW. B. F. (1986). Volcanic episodicity and a non-steady state rift valley along northeast Pacific spreading centers: evidence from Sea MARC I.J. Geophys. Res.9113925–13940. 10.1029/JB091iB14p13925
47
KarlinR. E.ZierenbergR. A. (1994). “Sedimentation and neotectonism in the SESCA area, Escanaba Trough, southern gorda ridge,” in Geologic, Hydrothermal, and biologic studies at Escanaba Trough, Gorda Ridge, Offshore Northern California, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2022, edsMortonJ. L.ZierenbergR. A.ReissC. A., (Reston, VA: USGS), 131–141.
48
KarsonJ. A.RonaP. A. (1990). Block-tilting, transfer faults, and structural control of magmatic and hydrothermal processes in the TAG area, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 26°N.Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.1021635–1645. 10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<1635:bttfas>2.3.co;2
49
KleinE. M.LangmuirC. H. (1987). Global correlations of mid-ocean ridge basalt chemistry with axial depth and crustal thickness.J. Geophys. Res.928089–8115. 10.1038/s41598-019-57344-4
50
KlinkhammerG. P.GermanC. R.ElderfieldH.GreavesM. J.MitraA. (1994). Rare earth elements in hydrothermal fluids and plume particulates by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.Mar. Chem.45179–186. 10.1016/0304-4203(94)90001-9
51
LavierL. L.BuckW. R. (2002). Half-graben versus large-offset low-angle normal fault: importance of keeping cool during normal faulting.J. Geophys. Res.107ETG8–1–ETG8–13.
52
Le SaoutM.DeschampsA.SouleS. A.GenteP. (2014). Segmentation and eruptive activity along the East Pacific Rise at 16°N, in relation with the nearby Mathematician hotspot.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.154380–4399. 10.1002/2014GC005560
53
MBARI Mapping Team (2001). MBARI West Coast Seamounts and Ridges Multibeam Survey.Moss Landing, CA: MBARI.
54
McDonoughW. F.SunS. S. (1995). The composition of the Earth.Chem. Geol.120223–253.
55
MitraA.ElderfieldH.GreavesM. J. (1994). Rare earth elements in submarine hydrothermal fluids and plumes from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.Mar. Chem.45217–235. 10.1016/0304-4203(94)90079-5
56
MurtonB. L.RonaP. A. (2015). Carlsberg Ridge and Mid-Atlantic Ridge: comparison of slow spreading centre analogues.Deep Sea Res. II12171–84. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.04.021
57
PaduanJ. B.ZierenbergR. A.ClagueD. A.CaressD. W.ThomasH.TroniG.et al (2019). Hydrothermal vent fields on Alarcon Rise and in the southern Pescadero Basin, southern Gulf of California.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.194788–4819. 10.1029/2018GC007771
58
PasulkaA. L.GoffrediS. K.TavorminaP. L.DawsonK. S.LevinL. A.RouseG. W.et al (2017). Colonial tube-dwelling ciliates influence methane cycling and microbial diversity within methane seep ecosystems.Front. Mar. Sci.3:276. 10.3389/fmars.2016.00276
59
PerfitM. R.ChadwickW. W.Jr. (1998). “Magmatism at mid-ocean ridges: Constraints from volcanological and geochemical investigations,” in Faulting and magmatism at Mid-Ocean Ridges, Geophysical Monograph Series, ed.BuckW. R., (Washington DC: American Geophysical Union), 59–115. 10.1029/gm106p0059
60
ReynoldsJ. R.LangmuirC. H. (2000). Identification and implications of off-axis lava flows around the East Pacific Rise.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.1:1019. 10.1029/1999GC000033
61
RonaP. A. (1988). Hydrothermal mineralization at ocean ridges.Can. Mineral.26431–465.
62
RonaP. A.ClagueD. A. (1989). Geologic controls of hydrothermal discharge on the northern Gorda Ridge.Geology171097–1101.
63
RonaP. A.DenlingerR. P.FiskM. R.HowadK. J.TaghonG. L.KlitgordK. D.et al (1990). Major off-axis hydrothermal activity on the northern Gorda Ridge.Geology18493–496.
64
RonaP. A.MeisP. J.BeaversonC. A.EmbleyR. W.FoxC. G. (1992). Geological setting of hydrothermal activity at the northern Gorda Ridge.Mar. Geol.106189–201. 10.1016/0025-3227(92)90129-6
65
RossS. L.ZierenbergR. A. (1994). “Volcanic geomorphology of the SESCA and NESCA sites, Escanaba Trough,” in Geologic, Hydrothermal, and Biologic Studies at Escanaba Trough, Gorda Ridge, Offshore Northern California, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2022, edsMortonJ. L.ZierenbergR. A.ReissC. A., (Los Angeles, CA: UGSC), 143–151.
66
RubinK. H.SmithM. C.BergmanisE. C.PerfitM. R.SintonJ. M.BatizaR. (2001). Geochemical heterogeneity within mid-ocean ridge lava flows: insights into eruption, emplacement and global variations in magma generation.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.188349–367. 10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00339-9
67
RubinK. H.SmithM. C.PerfitM. R.ChristieD. M.SacksL. F. (1998). Geochronology and geochemistry of lavas from the 1996 north Gorda Ridge eruption.Deep Sea Res. II452571–2597. 10.1016/s0967-0645(98)00084-8
68
RubinK. H.SouleS. A.ChadwickW. W.Jr.FornariD. J.ClagueD. A.EmbleyR. W.et al (2012). Volcanic eruptions in the deep sea.Oceanogr. Magaz.25142–157.
69
ShawH. R. (1972). Viscosities of magmatic silicate liquids: an empirical method of prediction.Am. J. Sci.272870–893. 10.2475/ajs.272.9.870
70
SmithD. K.CannJ. R. (1992). The role of seamount volcanism in crustal construction at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (24°-30°N).J. Geophys. Res.971645–1658. 10.1029/91jb02507
71
SmithD. K.CannJ. R. (1993). Building the crust at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.Nature365707–715. 10.1038/365707a0
72
SmithD. K.EscartínJ.SchoutenH.CannJ. R. (2012). Active long-lived faults emerging along slow-spreading mid-ocean ridges.Oceanography2594–99. 10.5670/oceanog.2012.07
73
SouleS. A.EscartınJ.FornariD. J. (2009). A record of eruption and intrusion at a fast spreading ridge axis: axial summit trough of the East Pacific Rise at 9–10°N.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.10:Q10T07. 10.1029/2008GC002354
74
SouleS. A.FornariD. J.PerfitM. R.RubinK. H. (2007). New insights into mid-ocean ridge volcanic processes from the 2005–2006 eruption of the East Pacific Rise, 9°46’N–9°56’N.Geology351079–1082. 10.1130/G23924A.1
75
SouleS. A.FornariD. J.PerfitM. R.TiveyM. A.RidleyW. I.SchoutenH. (2005). Channelized lava flows at the East Pacific Rise crest 9°–10°N: the importance of off-axis lava transport in developing the architecture of young oceanic crust.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.6:Q08005. 10.1029/2005GC000912
76
StakesD. S.PerfitM. R.TiveyM. A.CaressD. W.RamirezT. M.MaherN. (2006). The Cleft revealed: geologic, magnetic, and morphologic evidence for construction of the upper oceanic crust along the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:Q04003. 10.1029/2005GC001038
77
Van DoverC. L.GrassleJ. F.BoudriasM. (1990). “Hydrothermal vent fauna of Escanaba Trough,” in Gorda Ridge: A Frontier Area in the United States Exclusive Economic Zone, ed.McMurrayG. R., (New York, NY: Springer-Verlag), 285–287. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3258-2_21
78
Von DammK. L.ParkerC. M.LilleyM. D.ClagueD. A.ZierenbergR. A.OlsonE. J.et al (2006). Chemistry of vent fluids and its implications for subsurface conditions at Sea Cliff hydrothermal field, Gorda Ridge.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:Q05005. 10.1029/2005GC001034
79
Von DammK. L.ParkerC. M.ZierenbergR. A.LilleyM. D.OlsenE. J.ClagueD. A.et al (2005). The Escanaba Trough, Gorda Ridge hydrothermal system: temporal stability and subseafloor complexity.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta694971–4984. 10.1016/j.gca.2005.04.018
80
WatersC. L.SimsK. W. W.SouleS.Blichert-ToftJ.DunbarN. W.PlankT.et al (2013). Recent volcanic accretion at 98N–108N East Pacific Rise as resolved by combined geochemical and geological observations.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.142547–2574. 10.1002/ggge.20134
81
WhiteS. M.HaymonR. M.FornariD. J.PerfitM. R.MacdonaldK. C. (2002). Correlation between volcanic and tectonic segmentation of fast-spreading ridges: evidence from volcanic structures and lava morphology on the East Pacific Rise, 9°–10°N.J. Geophys. Res.107:2173. 10.1029/2001JB000571
82
WhiteS. M.MacdonaldK. C.HaymonR. M. (2000). Basaltic lava domes, lava lakes, and volcanic segmentation on the southern East Pacific Rise.J. Geophys. Res.10523519–23536. 10.1029/2000JB900248
83
WhiteS. N.DunkR. M.PeltzerE. T.FreemanJ. J.BrewerP. G. (2006). In situ Raman analysis of deep-sea hydrothermal and cold seep systems (Gorda Ridge and hydrate ridge.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7:1204. 10.1029/2005GC001204
84
YeoI.SearleR. C. (2013). High-resolution remotely operated vehicle (ROV) mapping of the slow-spreading ridge: mid-Atlantic ridge 45°N.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.141693–1702. 10.1002/ggge.20082
85
YeoI.SearleR. C.AchenbachK. L.Le BasT. P.MurtonB. J. (2012). Eruptive hummocks, building blocks of the upper crust.Geology4091–94. 10.1130/G31892.1
86
YeoI. A.ClagueD. A.MartinJ. F.PaduanJ. B.CaressD. W. (2013). Pre-eruptive flow focusing in dikes feeding historic pillow ridges on and Juan de Fuca and Gorda Ridges.Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.143586–3599. 10.1002/ggge.20210
87
ZierenbergR. A.MortonJ. L.KoskiR. A.RossS. L. (1994). “Geologic setting of massive sulfide mineralization in Escanaba Trough,” in Geologic, Hydrothermal, and Biologic Studies at Escanaba Trough, Gorda Ridge, Offshore Northern California, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2022, edsMortonJ. L.ReissCA, (Los Angeles, CA: UGSC), 171–197.
88
ZierenbergR. A.SchiffmanP.JonassonI. R.TosdalR.PickthornW.McClainJ. (1995). Alteration of basalt hyaloclastite at the off-axis Sea Cliff hydrothermal field, Gorda Ridge.Chem. Geol.12677–99. 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00111-2
Summary
Keywords
mapping AUV, hydrothermal vent field, mid-ocean ridge volcanism, Gorda Ridge, MORB
Citation
Clague DA, Paduan JB, Caress DW, McClain J and Zierenberg RA (2020) Lava Flows Erupted in 1996 on North Gorda Ridge Segment and the Geology of the Nearby Sea Cliff Hydrothermal Vent Field From 1-M Resolution AUV Mapping. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:27. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00027
Received
30 May 2019
Accepted
16 January 2020
Published
03 March 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited by
Stephen Hammond, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (NOAA), United States
Reviewed by
Colin Devey, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany; Roger Searle, Durham University, United Kingdom
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Clague, Paduan, Caress, McClain and Zierenberg.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: David A. Clague, clague@mbari.org
This article was submitted to Deep-Sea Environments and Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.