Abstract
Understanding the environmental conditions that trigger Pseudo-nitzschia bloom formation and domoic acid (DA) production is critical as the frequency and severity of these toxic blooms increases in the face of anthropogenic change. However, predicting the formation of these harmful blooms in a future ocean remains a challenge. Previous studies have examined the effects of single environmental drivers on Pseudo-nitzschia spp. growth and toxin production, but few have considered the interactions between them. In this multiple driver study with Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, we used a full factorial matrix experimental design to examine the simultaneous effects of temperature (20 and 25°C), nitrogen source (nitrate and urea), and irradiance (photosynthetically active radiation with and without ultraviolet B radiation; UVB). This strain of P. multiseries was unable to withstand prolonged exposures (>0.5 h) to 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 UVB light, with implications for near-surface bloom formation if future shallower mixed layers increase UVB exposure. Growth rates were inhibited by UVB, but photosynthesis and carbon fixation continued at a reduced capacity. Additionally, DA synthesis continued despite UVB-induced growth inhibition. Warming by 5°C enhanced cellular DA quotas three-fold. Within these warmer treatments, urea-grown cultures exposed to UVB had the highest amount of DA per cell, suggesting that interactive effects between UVB exposure, warming, and urea can synergistically enhance toxin production. However, overall production of toxic biomass was low, as growth-integrated DA production rates were near zero. This indicates that although Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries cell-specific toxicity could worsen in an anthropogenically-altered future ocean, bloom formation may be inhibited by increased exposure to UVB. This multi-variable experimental approach revealed previously unknown interactions that could not have been predicted based on combined effects of single-variable experiments. Although P. multiseries DA production may be enhanced in a future ocean, inherent sensitivity to prolonged UVB exposure may moderate trophic transfer of toxin to coastal food webs.
Introduction
Harmful algal blooms (HABs) threaten human health and are responsible for millions of dollars lost to fisheries and tourism every year (). In coastal areas around the globe, annual blooms of the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia spp. pose a serious threat to human and ecosystem health. Members of this genus produce domoic acid (DA), an amino acid-like molecule that is a potent neurotoxin that affects humans, marine mammals, and sea birds (Figure 1; ; Trainer et al., 2012; ). DA bioaccumulates in the food web, most notably in commercially harvested species such as shellfish, crustaceans, and finfish (), which can lead to strandings and mass mortality of cetaceans, otters, and pinnipeds (). Human consumption of DA-contaminated seafood causes amnesic shellfish poisoning, a neurological disorder that in severe cases can cause death (). Thus, commercial fisheries must close during toxic bloom events, leading to massive economic losses (Ritzman et al., 2018). The increasing frequency and severity of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. blooms may be linked to climate and anthropogenic change (; Smith et al., 2018; ; Trainer et al., 2020), but the direct causes of bloom formation and toxin production remain poorly understood.
FIGURE 1
Climate change and other anthropogenic influences are increasingly altering many aspects of coastal environments, and consequentially, the provenance and occurrence of HABs. Laboratory experiments have demonstrated relationships between DA production and individual environmental drivers. For instance, because warming is an unequivocal consequence of climate change, temperature effects on Pseudo-nitzschia spp. growth and toxicity have been well studied (
However, water temperature is not the only way in which the coastal ocean will be altered in the future. Warming itself modifies other key environmental variables, and in fact induces a cascade of numerous changes. Warming-enhanced stratification of the water column may cause the mixed layer to shoal, and decrease the delivery of nutrients like nitrate to phytoplankton in the surface ocean (
Because nitrogen is required for both growth and DA biosynthesis, the effects of excess nitrogen loading (eutrophication) and chemical speciation on Pseudo-nitzschia spp. have been well documented (
Another indirect consequence of warming is that phytoplankton cells will be exposed to more intense light regimes in a shallower mixed layer, including both photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; 400–700 nm) and shallow-penetrating ultraviolet B radiation (UVB; 280–315 nm;
Despite the multitude of studies identifying particular environmental variables that affect Pseudo-nitzschia growth and toxin production in the lab, the oceanic conditions that fuel blooms in the natural environment remain poorly understood. The majority of these experiments have focused on studying responses to a single factor, yet these conditions do not accurately reflect the natural coastal environment where multiple drivers interactively impact bloom dynamics. Indeed, the few studies that have examined multiple factors have often shown interactive effects between variables (
The objective of the present study was to elucidate the potential interactive effects of multiple environmental change drivers on the physiology and toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries. We used a full factorial matrix experimental design to examine the combined effects of three environmentally relevant anthropogenic and climate change variables, including temperature (20 vs. 25°C), nitrogen source (nitrate vs. urea), and light (PAR-only vs. UVB-exposed). We hypothesized that experiments examining the complex interactions between these key drivers would better reflect the dynamics occurring in natural coastal ecosystems. Our results suggest that while warming is the main individual driver of increased DA production, there are interactive effects between UVB, warming, and nitrogen source that exacerbate toxicity to a greater extent than could have been predicted by examining each variable in isolation.
Materials and Methods
Culture Conditions
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries was isolated from Sungo Bay, Yellow Sea, China (37° 02′ N, 122° 33′ E). The ambient sea surface temperature was 19.8°C at the time of isolation. In the laboratory, cells were maintained semi-continuously on modified F/2 medium at 20°C on a 12-h light:12-h dark cycle under 130 μmol m–2 s–1 cool white fluorescent light. Modified F/2 medium (100 μM total nitrogen, 100 μM silicate, 6 μM phosphate;
UVB Intensity and Dose Experiments
Preliminary experiments using in vivo fluorescence (measured with a Trilogy Laboratory Fluorometer, Turner Designs, United States) to calculate growth rates demonstrated that P. multiseries was unable to survive relatively high UVB intensities of 0.18 mw⋅cm–2 for 4 h each day over a 2-day period (Supplementary Table 2). This led us to lower the UVB intensity and analyze the dose duration-dependent responses of P. multiseries photosystem (PS) health.
To determine the duration of ultraviolet B radiation (UVB; 280–315 nm) exposure to use in our full factorial matrix experiments, effective quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) was measured as a proxy for photosynthetic efficiency for P. multiseries exposed to UVB (+UVB; Philips FS20T12-UVB Broadband bulb), concurrent with PAR irradiance (>400 nm; irradiance conditions described in section “Culture Conditions”), for varying durations on a daily basis. Cultures maintained semi-continuously in the exponential growth phase were incubated at 20°C in modified F/2 medium with nitrate (see section “Culture Conditions”) under 130 μmol m–2 s–1 cool white fluorescent light and allowed to acclimate for 2 weeks (∼10 generations) until steady state growth was achieved. New medium was then inoculated at a concentration of ∼20,000 cells per liter, and triplicate quartz bottles were incubated under four different durations of 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 +UVB: 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 h each day, over a 2-day period. This regimen was chosen to simulate transitory mixing of cells to near-surface, high-UVB waters in the natural environment (
Multiple Driver Experimental Design
A three-by-two full factorial matrix experimental design was used to examine all three-way combinations of temperature, nitrogen source, and irradiance, each at two treatment levels (Figure 1). The treatments for each variable were selected based on conditions reflecting contemporary oceans, and those predicted for future oceans altered by climate and anthropogenic change (
Cultures were not acclimated to UVB in order to simulate a short-term mixing event, whereby cells residing deeper in the euphotic zone are advected closer to the surface ocean and suddenly exposed to shallow penetrating UVB light (
Cultures were acclimated and grown in their respective temperature-nitrogen source combinations using semi-continuous culturing methods, which allowed the cells to remain in the exponential growth phase. By reducing culture cell density every other day to a concentration in the early exponential growth phase, cells were allowed to grow at rates determined by acclimation to temperature and nitrogen, rather than having a growth rate imposed on them (as in continuous cultures) or growing into nutrient-starved stationary phase (as in batch cultures). Therefore, in our P. multiseries experiments near steady-state exponential growth rates, physiology, and toxicity were measured as they were influenced by temperature and nitrogen source.
Once cultures had achieved acclimated steady-state growth under experimental conditions, fresh medium was inoculated with ∼20,000 cells per liter. All treatments were incubated in 500 mL quartz experimental tubes under their respective conditions continuously for 48-h. Under PAR irradiance, +UVB treatments were exposed to 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 UVB from the UVB bulb for 0.5 h per day at midday (11:45-12:15), twice over the 2-day experimental period. This exposure regimen represents transitory vertical mixing. Incident UVB radiation was measured with a digital ultraviolet radiometer (Solarmeter). PAR-only treatments were grown under the same conditions, but on a different shelf in the same incubator. These PAR-only quartz tubes were wrapped in a UVB-absorbing Ultraphan film 395 (UV Opak, Digefra), which only allows the penetration of PAR wavelengths (400–700 nm;
Analytical Methods
Cell Counts and Growth Rates
Cell count samples were obtained at the beginning of the experiment just after medium inoculation (T0), and again during final sampling (T48). Samples were preserved in a 10% Lugol’s solution, stored at room temperature until counted on a Nikon Eclipse Ts2-FL light microscope (NIKON, Tokyo, Japan) using a Sedgewick Rafter Chamber. Specific growth rates were determined using cell counts (only counting frustules that contained chloroplasts) and the following equation:
where μ is the specific growth rate (per day) and N is the number of cells at T0 and T48.
Elemental Analysis
To measure particulate organic carbon and nitrogen, 20-100 mL of culture was filtered on glass microfiber (GF/F) filters (pre-combusted at 500°C for 2 h), then dried for at least 48 h at 60°C in a drying oven. Dried filters were pelleted for analysis on a Costech 4010 Elemental Analyzer (
Domoic Acid
Samples for cellular toxin quotas (particulate DA) were collected at the end of the experiment (T48) by filtering 50 mL of culture onto 0.5 μm polycarbonate filters and stored at −20°C until subsequent analysis. Sample extraction and cleanup were carried out according to Wang et al. (2012) with minor modifications to the protocol. For each sample, 8 mL of 10% methanol/water (methanol:water, 1:9, v/v) was added to a 10 mL plastic conical centrifuge tube containing the filter, then homogenized by vortexing at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were disrupted by sonication using a 650 W sonic disrupter at 30% amplitude of power setting for 2 min on an ice slurry to release intracellular DA into solution. The extraction was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 5 min and then filtered with a 0.22 μm MCM syringe filter into an LC vial for liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis.
Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry analysis was performed using an U3000 HPLC system (Thermo Scientific, United States) linked to a Thermo TSQ Endura mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI source operated in positive ionization mode. The chromatographic system equipped with a binary pump and an autosampler with a 100 μL sample loop. To obtain maximum abundance of molecular ions and generate higher sensitivity for analyte, optimization of MS/MS parameters was necessary. Using flow injection analysis at 10 μl min–1, the mass spectrometer was tuned using the CRM-DA-f DA standard solution (1 μg mL–1; National Resource Council, Canada) and the final ion source conditions were as follows: spray voltage (kV) of +3.50, sheath gas flow 25 (arb), auxiliary gas flow 15 (arb), sweep gas flow 0 (arb), ion transfer tube temperature of 300°C, and vaporizer temperature of 250°C.
Full scan MS in the positive ion mode gave the predominant peak at [M+H]+m/z 312.0, which was selected as precursor ion. The SRM transitions from the protonated DA ion were m/z 312.0 > 266.0 ([M-HCOOH+H]+) at collision energy (CE) = 15 V used for quantitative analysis, and two confirmatory transitions of m/z 312.0 > 248.0 ([M-HCOOH–H2O+H]+) at CE = 16 V and m/z 312.0 > 161.0 ([M-HCOOH-C2H3O2N-H2O-CH2+H]+) at CE = 22 V, all with a RF lens of 142 V, a dwell time of 250 ms, and a collision induced dissociation gas setting of 1.5 mTorr. Resolution of both quadrupoles Q1 and Q3 were set at 0.7 FWHM. Chromeleon and Xcalibur software were used for the entire MS tune, instrument control, data acquisition, and data analysis. Quantitative analysis was attained by an external standard method with DA calibration solutions at a concentration of 1,000 ng ml–1. DA had a retention time of around 9.49 min. The flow was diverted to waste by a six-way valve for the 0–7.5 min and 11.5–25.0 min of each run to keep the ion source clean.
Photophysiology
The maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), effective quantum yield of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), relative electron transport rate (rETR), and light saturation point (Ik) of live cultures was assessed using a Multi-Color-PAM Chlorophyll Fluorometer (MC-PAM; Heinz Walz GmbH, Germany; Schreiber et al., 2011) at the time of final sampling.
Fv/Fm was measured after 15 min of dark adaptation of the cultures and calculated as
Fv′/Fm′ was measured at an actinic light value close to the experimental PAR irradiance (230 μmol photons m–2 s–1) and calculated using the following the equation:
Non-photochemical quenching was calculated as:
Relative electron transport rate was calculated using the following equation:
where 0.5 is the equal distribution of photons between PSII and PSI, and 0.84, the homogeneous absorption factor, is a widely accepted absorptivity value (
Statistical Methods
Multivariate analyses were conducted in R version 4.0.21 using statistical tools in Rallfun-v382. A percentile bootstrap method for multiple comparisons of 20% trimmed means (t3way) was used to detect significant one-, two-, and three-way interactions between variables (temperature, nitrogen, and irradiance) in the three-by-two factorial matrix experiment. A percentile bootstrap method for comparing 20% trimmed means (t1way) was used to detect significant differences in final (T48) Fv/Fm values in UVB dosage experiments. Pairwise analyses using percentile bootstrapping of 20% trimmed means (trimpb2) were also conducted to test for significant differences between any two matrix treatments for growth rates, DA quotas and production rates, and photophysiology measurements. All tests were performed at the α = 0.05 level. These robust methods were chosen over classical one- and three-way ANOVA tests as they do not assume normality or homoscedasticity (Wilcox, 2003).
Results
Determining Sensitivity of Photosynthesis to UVB With Dosage Experiments
In initial short-term UVB dosage experiments, measurements of the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) showed that P. multiseries PSII activity was unable to tolerate exposure to 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 UVB for >2 h per day, or any dose of UVB greater than 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 (Supplementary Tables 1, 2). The average Fv/Fm of all treatments at T0 was 0.623 (Figure 2). From T0 to T24 (following one dose of UVB), Fv/Fm declines were similar across all treatments: 44, 47.3, and 42% for 2, 1, and 0.5 h of exposure, respectively (Figure 2). Fv/Fm was significantly different between treatments at T48 (t1way, p = 0.000004), after two UVB doses. In cultures exposed for 2 or 1 h per day, Fv/Fm further decreased to 0.072 and 0.086 (respectively) after a second UVB exposure, declining by a total of 88.7 and 85.8% from T0 to T48. However, Fv/Fm of cultures exposed to UVB for 0.5 h per day only declined to 0.319, representing a 47% decline from T0 to T48 (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

Change in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) of P. multiseries in UVB dose experiments. Cultures were exposed to 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 UVB for different lengths of time (0.5, 1, and 2 h). Cultures exposed to photosynthetically active radiation with no UVB (PAR-only) served as a control. UVB exposure occurred once daily (just after T0 and T24). Fv/Fm was measured at the time of inoculation (T0), before and after each UVB exposure, and at the time of final sampling. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3).
Growth Rates
Spectral quality of irradiance had the greatest impact on P. multiseries growth (t3way, p = 0.0001). Cell-specific growth rates were <0.05 day–1 for all UVB-exposed (+UVB) treatments (Figure 3A and Supplementary Table 3). In contrast, a temperature-nitrogen source interaction impacting growth rates was observed for the PAR-only treatments (t3way three-way interaction, p = 0.046; Figure 3B, Supplementary Table 4). Growth rates for treatments with nitrate differed between temperatures (20 vs. 25°C), while those of cells grown with urea did not. For nitrate-supported cultures, growth rates declined from 0.58 to 0.39 day–1 (46.3% decrease) with warming from 20 to 25°C (pairwise comparison between two treatments, p < 0.001, and Supplementary Table 5). Conversely, growth rates for urea-supported cells were not significantly different at 0.51 and 0.50 day–1 for 20 and 25°C, respectively.
FIGURE 3

Interaction plots of P. multiseries cell-specific growth rates for each three-way combination of the variables examined (each at two levels of treatment) in the experimental matrix. Data are shown as interactions between temperature and nitrogen source for (A) +UVB and (B) PAR-only cultures. A significant three-way interaction was observed between temperature, light, and nitrogen source (t3way, p = 0.046). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments, based on pairwise analyses (Supplementary Table 5).
Domoic Acid
Cellular DA quotas at 25°C were on average three orders of magnitude greater than DA quotas in the 20°C incubations, regardless of nitrogen source or irradiance (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table 3). Similarly, DA production rates for PAR-only treatments were on average two orders of magnitude greater at 25°C, relative to 20°C (Figure 4B and Supplementary Table 3). Additionally, DA production was greatly reduced by UVB exposure (t3way, p = 0.0001). On average, DA production rates for all +UVB treatments were 8.1 × 10–3 pg cell–1 day–1, while maximum DA production rates, measured for 25°C PAR-only with nitrate or with urea treatments, were two orders of magnitude greater (0.22 and 0.18 pg cell–1 day–1, respectively).
FIGURE 4

Cellular DA quotas and production rates plotted on a logarithmic scale. (A) DA quotas and (B) DA production rates for each matrix combination of temperature, nitrogen source, and light regime. Scaling demonstrates the large temperature effect on DA quotas and production rates. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments, based on pairwise analyses (Supplementary Table 5).
The three-way interaction between nitrogen source, temperature, and irradiance was deemed significant for DA quotas (t3way, p = 0.032; Figures 5A,B and Supplementary Table 4). Interactions between light and nitrogen source (t3way, p = 0.032) were observed at each respective temperature treatment (i.e., within 20°C treatments, and within 25°C treatments); therefore, results are presented separately for each temperature treatment in the following sections. DA quotas have been plotted as interaction plots to aid in the comparison of trends both across and within treatments, and to highlight the primary drivers of differences between treatments.
FIGURE 5

Cellular DA quotas and production rates for P. multiseries. Average DA quotas are shown relative to the interactions between nitrogen source and light for (A) 20°C treatments and (B) 25°C treatments. A significant three-way interaction was observed between temperature, irradiance, and nitrogen (t3way, p = 0.032). Note that scaling for y-axes differs between each plot. DA production rates are plotted with separate scales for 20°C (C) and 25°C treatments (D). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments, based on pairwise analyses (Supplementary Table 5).
Domoic Acid Quotas at 20°C
Within each light treatment, DA quotas were significantly greater with nitrate than with urea (pairwise comparison, PAR p < 0.001; UVB p = 0.001; Figure 5A and Supplementary Tables 3, 5). This difference was greater for +UVB treatments: cultures with nitrate contained 8.21 × 10–4 pg DA cell–1, while cultures with urea contained 3.13 × 10–4 pg DA cell–1. DA quotas also differed between light treatments, especially for nitrate-grown cells; DA quotas significantly increased from 3.54 × 10–4 pg DA cell–1 when grown under PAR-only, to 8.21 × 10–4 pg DA cell–1 with UVB exposure (pairwise comparison, p < 0.001). DA quotas also differed between PAR-only with urea and +UVB with urea treatments (1.41 × 10–4 and 3.13 × 10–4 pg cell–1, respectively; pairwise comparison, p = 0.001), but the magnitude of this difference was smaller compared to nitrate-grown cells (Figure 5A).
Domoic Acid Quotas at 25°C
The greatest DA quotas were observed at 25°C, relative to 20°C treatments (Figures 5A,B and Supplementary Table 3). For the two 25°C treatments with nitrate, cellular DA quotas did not significantly differ between light regimes; PAR-only with nitrate DA quotas were on average 0.56 pg cell–1, similar to those of +UVB with nitrate (0.52 pg cell–1; Figure 5B). Conversely, a large difference in cellular DA quotas was observed between PAR-only with urea and +UVB with urea treatments (pairwise comparison, p < 0.001, and Supplementary Table 5). When 25°C urea treatments were exposed to UVB, cellular DA quotas increased from 0.39 to 0.93 pg cell–1 (Figure 5B). Despite higher cellular DA quotas, DA production rates were much lower in UVB treatments than in PAR treatments at both 20°C (Figure 5C) and 25°C (Figure 5D) for both nitrogen sources, due to the greatly reduced growth rates in all treatments after UVB exposure (Figure 3).
Examining the same four treatments in the context of nitrogen source-effects within light treatments (i.e., 25°C PAR with nitrate vs. with urea, and 25°C +UVB with nitrate vs. with urea) allows for interpretation of the data from another perspective, revealing additional key differences between treatments (Figure 5B). DA quotas differed between nitrogen sources within each light treatment, both in terms of magnitudes and direction of change. Under a PAR-only light regime, DA production was 1.46 times higher with nitrate (0.56 pg cell–1) than urea (0.39 pg cell–1), but the difference was marginally not significant at p = 0.058 (pairwise comparison). In contrast, +UVB treatments produced significantly more DA with urea (0.93 pg cell–1) compared to treatments with nitrate (0.52 pg cell–1; p < 0.001).
Photophysiology
Large differences were observed between PAR-only and +UVB treatments for Fv/Fm and effective quantum yield (Fv′/Fm′; Figures 6A,B and Supplementary Table 6). At 20°C, Fv/Fm decreased with UVB exposure by 58.7% for nitrate and 52.5% for urea. For 25°C treatments with nitrate and with urea, Fv/Fm declined in +UVB treatments by 42.2 and 45.2%, respectively (Figure 6A). The magnitude of decline was greater for Fv′/Fm′: 78.8 and 71.9% for 20°C treatments with nitrate and with urea, and 74.5 and 74.5% for 25°C treatments with nitrate and with urea (Figure 6B). Furthermore, a significant temperature-nitrogen interaction was observed for both Fv/Fm and Fv′/Fm′ (t3way, p = 0.007 and p = 0.001, Supplementary Table 4). For PAR-only treatments, Fv/Fm did not significantly differ between 20 and 25°C treatments, with urea averaging 0.592 and 0.579, respectively (Figure 6A). A similar trend was observed for Fv′/Fm′ values, which were 0.496 and 0.508, respectively (Figure 6B). However, Fv/Fm and Fv′/Fm′ for PAR-only with nitrate treatments did differ between temperatures; with an increase in temperature, Fv/Fm decreased by 14.8% from 0.610 to 0.520 (Figure 6A), while Fv′/Fm′ decreased by 21.1% from 0.536 to 0.432 (Figure 6B). These temperature-dependent nitrogen source effects were not observed for +UVB treatments.
FIGURE 6

P. multiseries photophysiological parameters measured at the time of final sampling, including (A) maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), (B) effective quantum yield of PSII (Fv′/Fm′), (C) non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), (D) light saturation point (IK), and (E) relative electron transport rate (rETR) vs. PAR irradiance curve. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters represent statistically significant differences between treatments, based on pairwise analyses (Supplementary Table 5).
Non-photochemical quenching was 0 for all PAR-only treatments, except for a very low value of 0.017 at 25°C with nitrate (Figure 6C and Supplementary Table 6). The temperature-light interaction was deemed significant at the p = 0.003 level (t3way). For +UVB treatments, NPQ values were higher at 25°C with both nitrate and with urea (0.174 and 0.185, respectively) relative to 20°C treatments (0.068 and 0.071; Figure 6C). Differences between nitrogen treatments were not significant within each temperature.
Measured differences in the irradiance at the light saturation point (Ik) were mainly driven by light (t3way, p = 0.0001; Figure 6D, Supplementary Tables 4, 6). Decreases were observed from PAR-only to +UVB treatments at 20°C with nitrate (40.5%), 25°C with nitrate (41.4%), and 25°C with urea (51.9%), but 20°C with urea only decreased by 12.5%. Furthermore, trends within PAR-only treatments were under different controls than UVB-exposed treatments. For PAR-only, urea treatments did not vary between temperatures, while the Ik for nitrate treatments decreased with an increase in temperature. In contrast, within +UVB treatments, measured Ik values were greater at 20°C relative to 25°C within each nitrogen source treatment. Additionally, at each respective temperature, Ik was greater for treatments with urea compared to treatments with nitrate (Figure 6D).
Furthermore, maximum relative electron transport rates (rETRmax) for +UVB treatments were on average 5.37x lower than PAR-only treatments (Figure 6E and Supplementary Table 6). Differences between UVB treatments were not large in magnitude. In contrast, rETRmax for PAR-only treatments were dependent on interactions between nitrogen source and temperature (t3way, p = 0.001, Supplementary Table 4); urea treatments were similar between temperatures, yet there was an inverse relationship between temperature and rETRmax for nitrate treatments (Figure 6E).
Elemental Ratios and Quotas
The amount of carbon per cell (cellular carbon quota) significantly increased with UVB exposure (t3way, p = 0.0003; Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 4, 7). This increase was observed to a greater extent for 25°C treatments; relative to PAR-only, +UVB increased carbon quotas by 30 and 50% at 25°C with nitrate and 25°C with urea treatments, respectively. This +UVB effect was not observed for 20°C treatments. Similar light effects were observed for cellular nitrogen quotas (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). Smaller cellular nitrogen pools were measured at 20°C and were little influenced by UVB-exposure, yet at 25°C UVB-exposure increased nitrogen quotas relative to PAR-only treatments by 27.5 and 46.7% for both nitrate and urea treatments, respectively (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). However, while temperature alone did not significantly influence cellular carbon pools, it did influence nitrogen pools, demonstrated by increased nitrogen per cell for 25°C treatments (t3way, p = 0.012).
TABLE 1
| Cell quotas (μmol⋅cell–1) | Elemental ratios | |||||||
| Treatment | Carbon | Nitrogen | Phosphorus | Biogenic silica | C:N | C:P | N:P | BSi:C |
| 20°C Nitrate PAR | 3.53 × 10–6 (7.16 × 10–7) | 5.17 × 10–7 (3.02 × 10–7) | 5.17 × 10–8 (4.87 × 10–9) | 8.76 × 10–7 (6.75 × 10–8) | 7.250* (1.7) | 137.525* (14.77) | 14.098* (1.05) | 0.124* (0.01) |
| 20°C Nitrate UVB | 4.60 × 10–6 (9.19 × 10–7) | 9.38 × 10–7 (2.86 × 10–7) | 8.33 × 10–8 (1.00 × 10–8) | 9.02 × 10–7 (1.43 × 10–7) | 6.890* (1.30) | 142.951* (42.62) | 14.758 (2.54) | 0.082* (0.03) |
| 20°C Urea PAR | 4.65 × 10–6 (4.29 × 10–7) | 7.08 × 10–7 (1.21 × 10–7) | 5.39 × 10–8 (2.47 × 10–9) | 8.06 × 10–7 (7.48 × 10–8) | 7.697 (0.32) | 133.590* (8.74) | 15.030 (0.58) | 0.112* (0.01) |
| 20°C Urea UVB | 4.77 × 10–6 (9.96 × 10–7) | 8.83 × 10–7 (2.54 × 10–7) | 7.41 × 10–8 (5.11 × 10–9) | 8.25 × 10–7 (4.63 × 10–8) | 6.827* (0.27) | 113.250* (7.16) | 14.336* (1.79) | 0.099* (0.01) |
| 25°C Nitrate PAR | 7.73 × 10–6 (3.62 × 10–7) | 9.45 × 10–7 (1.09 × 10–7) | 6.17 × 10–8 (4.01 × 10–9) | 8.07 × 10–7 (1.97 × 10–7) | 8.179* (0.18) | 120.871* (11.56) | 15.214 (1.56) | 0.109* (0.03) |
| 25°C Nitrate UVB | 1.11 × 10–5 (1.22 × 10–6) | 1.30 × 10–6 (2.13 × 10–7) | 9.69 × 10–8 (1.67 × 10–8) | 1.17 × 10–6 (1.58 × 10–7) | 8.037* (0.86) | 95.919 (2.49) | 12.951* (2.85) | 0.127* (0.01) |
| 25°C Urea PAR | 6.28 × 10–6 (5.10 × 10–7) | 8.52 × 10–7 (7.90 × 10–8) | 8.30 × 10–8 (2.79 × 10–8) | 1.01 × 10–6 (1.19 × 10–7) | 7.474 (0.35) | 91.147* (16.68) | 11.157 (2.34) | 0.142* (0.01) |
| 25°C Urea UVB | 1.28 × 10–5 (2.67 × 10–7) | 1.60 × 10–6 (3.32 × 10–7) | 1.18 × 10–7 (1.43 × 10–8) | 1.12 × 10–6 (8.85 × 10–8) | 7.613 (0.34) | 92.567* (4.84) | 12.829* (1.89) | 0.103* (0.004) |
P. multiseries cellular elemental quotas and ratios.
For elemental ratios, * indicates values that are significantly different from Redfield Ratio. Numbers in parentheses represent standard deviations of the mean (n = 3).
Cellular phosphorus quotas were most influenced by irradiance (t3way, p = 0.002, and Supplementary Table 4), as each paired treatment showed a percent increase of at least 30% with UVB-exposure (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). Warming also influenced differences in measured cellular phosphorus quotas (t3way, p = 0.007). The smallest cellular phosphorus pools were measured for 20°C PAR-only with nitrate (5.17 × 10–8 μmol P cell–1), while the largest pools were an order of magnitude greater for 25°C +UVB with urea treatments (1.18 × 10–7 μmol P cell–1). Change in nitrogen source did not result in significant differences in phosphorus quotas between treatments (Table 1).
Temperature significantly increased biogenic silica (BSi) quotas (t3way, p = 0.014, Supplementary Table 4) for all treatments except 25°C PAR-only with nitrate (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). However, irradiance effects were marginally insignificant at the p = 0.054 level, and interactive effects between nitrogen and temperature were not significant. Cellular BSi quotas at 20°C were not significantly impacted by nitrogen source (Table 1).
C:N and C:P ratios were significantly impacted by temperature (t3way, p = 0.016 and p = 0.012, Supplementary Table 4). The largest C:N ratio was measured in the 25°C PAR with nitrate treatment, while the smallest was observed for 20°C UVB with urea (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7). All C:P ratios measured for 20°C treatments were significantly above the Redfield Ratio, while 25°C treatments were below (with the exception 25°C +UVB with nitrate). Nitrogen, irradiance, and interactive effects on C:P were not deemed statistically significant. Temperature effects on BSi:C ratios were marginally insignificant at the p = 0.056 level, with irradiance being a more significant driver of differences between treatments (t3way, p = 0.026). PAR-only treatments had larger BSi:C ratios than their paired UVB-exposed treatments, except for 25°C with nitrate. No significant differences in N:P ratios were detected between treatments (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 7).
Discussion
Dependency of Growth Under PAR-Only Conditions on Temperature-Nitrogen Interactions
Our multiple-driver experimental design revealed previously unknown interactions between temperature, nitrogen, and UVB in this HAB species. P. multiseries growth rates under PAR-only conditions were moderately affected by nitrogen source in a temperature-dependent manner. Growth rates for nitrate treatments declined with warming, while growth rates for cultures with urea did not differ between temperatures. Previous studies examining the effects of nitrogen source on Pseudo-nitzschia spp. growth rates have demonstrated a great degree of variability between both species and strains. Growth rates measured for two strains of P. multiseries were slower for urea-supported cultures relative to nitrate, while growth rates for another strain did not differ between nitrogen treatments. For some strains of P. calliantha and P. fraudulenta, growth rates decreased in urea-supported cultures compared to nitrate and ammonium. In contrast, no difference between nitrogen substrates was observed for P. australis (Thessen et al., 2009;
Climate and anthropogenic change may modify the inorganic nitrogen species available to phytoplankton in future oceans. In contemporary coastal oceans, primary productivity is primarily supported by naturally-supplied nitrate delivered to the surface ocean via mixing and upwelling (
Despite potential changes to nitrogen speciation and availability in coastal zones, our data suggest that P. multiseries grows at the same rate on both urea and nitrate at temperatures representative of a future, warmer ocean (25°C). Temperature and nitrogen also interacted to impact photosynthetic parameters like Fv/Fm, Fv′/Fm′, Ik, and rETRmax in a similar manner; measurements for nitrate-supported treatments decreased with warming, while temperature had negligible effects on the photophysiology of urea-supported cells. Therefore, at warmer temperatures (under PAR-only conditions), P. multiseries blooms and primary productivity may not be strongly influenced by shifting nitrogen sources. This aligns with previous evidence demonstrating that diatom nitrogen metabolism is highly flexible, enabling cells to alter uptake and assimilation mechanisms quickly and efficiently when other nitrogen sources become available (Smith et al., 2019). However, in the present study nitrate-supported growth rates at 25°C were slightly lower than maximum observed rates at 20°C for PAR-only treatments. This suggests that future warming may incrementally reduce P. multiseries growth, with implications for bloom development and primary productivity relative to contemporary nitrate-dominated systems. However, the trends just described are only applicable to PAR-only treatments. Therefore, these results are most relevant to populations of cells residing deeper in the water column where UVB is largely attenuated (see below).
P. multiseries Growth Under UVB Exposure
Despite the differential effects alternative nitrogen sources and warming may have on P. multiseries growth rates, increased UVB exposure in a future surface ocean may have an overpowering influence on bloom formation. Inhibition of cellular division across all treatments exposed to 0.06 mw⋅cm–2 UVB demonstrates that the growth of this strain of P. multiseries is strikingly sensitive to UVB. This dose of UVB is similar to near-surface measurements in the natural environment. For example, summertime UVB radiation measured just below the surface in the coastal Red Sea was 0.084 mw⋅cm–2 (
Many studies have demonstrated the sensitivity of phytoplankton to UVB, causing declines in both growth and photosynthesis (
We propose that the co-occurrence of UVB inhibition of growth and increased toxicity for some treatments is a situation similar to growth limitation by low silicate or phosphate availability. Growth rates are typically inversely correlated with DA production, since as cellular division decreases due to nutrient limitation or other growth-limiting stressors, DA production increases (
Other research suggests that ultraviolet A radiation (UVA; 320–400 nm) wavelengths can help to mitigate cellular UVB damage (
Furthermore, in the natural environment, self-shading can occur in dense phytoplankton blooms, reducing effective light exposure and decreasing oxidative stress within the population (
The extent to which UVB impacts P. multiseries in the natural environment will depend on changing physical oceanography. Projected ocean warming will intensify stratification of surface waters and cause the mixed layer to shoal, increasing the residence time of cells in the near-surface ocean. Consequentially, light exposure integrated over depth will increase, exposing cells to more intense PAR and especially to additional shallow penetrating UVB rays (
Cells Continued to Function Despite Inhibition of Growth and Damage to Photosystems
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries photosystem health was also impaired by UVB but was less sensitive compared to cellular division. Fv/Fm, Fv′/Fm′, Ik, and rETRmax decreased with UVB exposure relative to PAR-only treatments, indicating stress, damage to photosynthetic proteins, and a diminished capacity of photosystems to absorb and process light energy. In another study, the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium exhibited sharp declines in Fv′/Fm′ just 10 min after initial exposure to UVB, concurrent with measured reductions in carbon fixation rates (
Increases in cellular elemental quotas with UVB exposure and warming provide additional evidence for continued carbon fixation and nutrient uptake in stressed cells. Carbon per cell increased with UVB exposure for 25°C treatments. This effect was not observed at 20°C, indicating an interactive effect whereby UVB exposure magnifies the response of cells previously stressed by warming. Similarly, nitrogen and silica cell quotas were higher for 25°C UVB-exposed treatments, relative to the respective PAR-only treatments, though silica differences were marginal for the 25°C urea-supported treatments. Phosphorus quotas increased with UVB exposure at both temperatures, but the increase at 25°C was greater. These increased carbon, nitrogen, silica, and phosphorus pools suggest that both photosynthesis and nutrient uptake mechanisms continued to function in stressed cells. Because cellular division was inhibited by UVB, the fixed carbon and nutrients taken up by cells could not be used for growth related to cellular division. In other diatoms, cellular nutrient storage pools have increased when growth was inhibited by other stressors such as phosphate, silicate, nitrogen, and iron limitation (
The continued survival and functioning of cells under stress raises questions about post-stress recovery. Depending on the severity and duration of exposure to UVB, it is possible that P. multiseries may be able to recover and resume normal functioning. Studies have shown that cells can recover from UVB-caused photosynthetic inhibition once the stressor has been removed (Villafañe et al., 2007; Roncarati et al., 2008;
Multiple Stressor Effects on P. multiseries Toxicity
Temperature was the main driver of differences in cellular DA toxin quotas between treatments, regardless of nitrogen source or light spectrum. Although there were significant differences between 20°C nutrient and irradiance treatments, they were small. Therefore, any interactive effects occurring at 20°C are unlikely to have a great influence on the severity of a toxic bloom. On average, DA quotas were three orders of magnitude greater for 25°C treatments compared to 20°C incubations. This suggests that during current heatwave events or in a future consistently warmer ocean, P. multiseries toxicity per cell will increase. Previous laboratory studies have also demonstrated that warming above optimal growth temperatures can enhance toxin production in several Pseudo-nitzschia species (
Nitrogen source and UVB interacted with warming to influence DA quotas. The most DA was measured in the 25°C +UVB treatment with urea. In addition to warming stress, UVB also caused an increase in DA quotas for most treatments, relative to respective PAR-only treatments. However, the magnitude of this increase between PAR-only and +UVB treatments was temperature- and nitrogen source-dependent. DA biosynthesis and cellular division, both energetically demanding processes, tend to be decoupled: as cells become thermally-stressed, growth rates decline and DA production increases (
Light spectral quality strongly influenced calculated DA production rates. The calculation for DA production integrates growth rates and DA quotas, assuming DA production is proportional to growth. This provides us with an estimate of how much DA could be produced by a bloom, based on both the toxicity per cell and the rate at which this toxin-containing cellular biomass accumulates. P. multiseries was not able to grow with UVB exposure, so under this assumption the calculated DA production was also zero. Although this was true for two of the temperature-nitrogen pairings (20°C with urea and 25°C with nitrate), as DA quotas were equal between PAR and +UVB light treatments, DA quotas were greater with UVB relative to PAR-only for the other two temperature-nitrogen combinations (20°C with nitrate and 25°C with urea). This contradicts the assumption of the DA production rate calculation, whereby cells must be growing in order to produce DA. Therefore, calculated production rates can be somewhat deceptive because of this growth rate effect. In the present study, P. multiseries cells were able to continue photosynthesis and the uptake of nutrients. This excess energy and nitrogen not being used for growth may instead be used in other secondary metabolic processes, such as DA production. Some studies have found an inverse relationship between Pseudo-nitzschia DA production and growth rates. As cells become stressed for growth, DA production increases (
Our results suggest that although UVB treatments had near-zero growth rates, it is likely that the surviving cells were producing DA. In spite of this increased cell-specific toxicity, the amount of DA produced over time is what determines the ultimate accumulation of toxic biomass in a bloom. Although cells in UVB-exposed 20°C treatments with nitrate and 25°C treatments with urea were more toxic relative to their PAR counterparts, the inhibition of growth due to UVB prevents rapid biomass accumulation. Therefore, a toxic bloom is not likely to manifest under these conditions.
Because we did not measure dissolved DA (i.e., the fraction released into the medium), it is important to consider that our estimates of DA production may be low.
Interactions Between Irradiance and Nitrogen Source May Impact Cellular Energetics
Our study also showed that UVB reduces photosystem function, which may limit light harvesting capabilities. Light energy plays an important role in nitrogen uptake; when PAR irradiance is limiting, the uptake of urea, a reduced form of nitrogen, is less energetically expensive relative to nitrate (
Previous studies examining the effects of nitrogen source on P. multiseries DA production have demonstrated a large degree of variability between strains. For instance, one strain of P. multiseries produced more DA per cell in urea-supported cultures relative to those supported by nitrate, while two separate strains both produced more DA per cell on nitrate compared to urea (Thessen et al., 2009;
Prior studies interrogating the question of nitrogen source preference used measurements of nitrogen uptake kinetics as a proxy for preference. These revealed that P. fryxelliana preferred ammonium over nitrate, with urea being the least preferred nitrogen substrate. This low preference for urea was also observed in P. australis and P. delicatissima (
Multiplicative Interactions Between Multiple Drivers Provide New Insights Into P. multiseries Toxicity and Bloom Dynamics
The highest observed yield of DA per cell in this experiment may be a consequence of the interactive effects between urea, UVB, and warming that synergistically enhanced cellular DA quotas. This interaction was multiplicative, meaning the resulting DA quotas from the combination of these three variables could not have been predicted by adding together the effects of each individual driver (
This three-way interaction between warming, urea, and +UVB indicates that a future warmer, more stratified ocean with a greater influence of anthropogenic nutrients could enhance the toxicity of P. multiseries. However, these results also point to a potential decrease in P. multiseries bloom events, as increased UVB exposure may inhibit cellular division and growth that could offset enhanced toxicity. Despite increased toxicity per cell, harmful effects will not be so impactful if cellular abundances are low. Therefore, projected increases in cellular toxicity may be mitigated by UVB inhibition of bloom formation in a future ocean.
Alternatively, P. multiseries may find refuge from harmful UVB wavelengths in the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM). Field surveys have detected high abundances of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in the DCM (
These results demonstrate that multiple driver experimental approaches are necessary for revealing the complex interactive effects between climate-relevant environmental variables, with consequences for toxic Pseudo-nitzschia blooms. In situ observational studies and long-term monitoring datasets are also a convenient system for studying multiple stressors, as correlations can be made between numerous environmental parameters, Pseudo-nitzschia abundance, and particulate DA (
Conclusion
Our study is among the few to use more than two environmental drivers to test hypotheses regarding drivers of Pseudo-nitzschia toxicity and bloom formation (Tatters et al., 2018). These experiments suggest that certain combinations of environmental parameters can create conditions that synergistically or antagonistically enhance or reduce DA production and growth. The inclusion of multiple variables in experimental designs more accurately reflect the natural coastal environment where Pseudo-nitzschia spp. interacts with multiple environmental parameters simultaneously. Multiple stressor experiments therefore help us to gain a more holistic view of bloom dynamics in situ.
Because these three-way interactions cannot be predicted based on one variable alone, it is important to consider what might be missed by only including single variable experiments in models and forecasts. For instance, phosphorus and silicon limitation also seem to be a key driver of toxicity, yet we do not know how they interact in the context of multiple drivers (other than with ocean acidification; Sun et al., 2011; Tatters et al., 2012). These blooms threaten human health, the marine ecosystem, and economically important fisheries, thus accurately forecasting their occurrence is important to our ability to prepare rapid and effective responses to bloom events. However, our current HAB forecasting models are incomplete in their predictive powers, reducing our ability to anticipate toxic blooms. Although some predictive models include multiple variables, they typically do not include the interactive effects between them. Improvement of existing models may require more accurate representation of interactive effects between multiple environmental drivers on toxicity and growth of a diverse selection of toxic Pseudo-nitzschia species, in order to better understand HAB dynamics in a rapidly changing ocean.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the corresponding authors upon request, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
F-XF and DH conceived of and designed the experiment with help from KK and KG. KK carried out the experiment, with help from XJ and HL for PAM photophysiological measurements. KK, XJ, and HL conducted final sampling. Subsequent sample processing was done by KK, JK, and NYang. The data analyses were performed by KK, with help from MD. DX and NYe provided cultures and domoic acid sample processing. KK wrote the manuscript with contributions from DH, F-XF, KG, XJ, DX, NYe, and NYang. All authors reviewed and gave their approval for the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by California State Proposition 84 funding administered by the University of Southern California Sea Grant to DH and F-XF, and by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China awarded to KG (41720104005) and DX and NYe (41976110).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Julie M. Rose for valuable assistance with statistics. We also thank Dr. Senjie Lin for allowing us to use his laboratory equipment.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.664302/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AgustíS.LlabrésM. (2007). Solar radiation-induced mortality of marine pico-phytoplankton in the oligotrophic ocean.Photochem. Photobiol.83793–801. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00144.x
2
Al-AidaroosA. M.O El-SherbinyM. M. O.SatheeshS.ManthaG.AgustıS.CarrejaB.et al (2014). High mortality of red sea zooplankton under ambient solar radiation.PLoS One9:e108778. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108778
3
AndersonD. M.KaoruY.WhiteA. W. (2000). Economic Impacts From Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) in the United States.Technical Report WHOI-2000-11. Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
4
AnjaniP. A.LarssonM. E.WoodcockS.RubioA.FarrellH.BrettS.et al (2020). Fifteen years of Pseudo-nitzschia in an Australian estuary, including the first potentially toxic P. delicatissima bloom in the southern hemisphere.Estuar. Coast. Shelf S.236:106651. 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106651
5
AuroM. E.CochlanW. P. (2013). Nitrogen utilization and toxin production by two diatoms of the Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima complex: P. Cuspidata and P. Fryxelliana.J. Phycol.49156–169. 10.1111/jpy.12033
6
BarrosM. P.PedersénM.ColepicoloP.SnoeijsP. (2003). Self-shading protects phytoplankton communities against H2O2-induced oxidative damage.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.30275–282.
7
BatesS. S.de FreitasA. S. W.MilleyJ. E.PocklingtonR.QuillamM. A.SmithJ. C.et al (1991). Controls on domoic acid production by the diatom Nitzschia pungens f. multiseries in culture: nutrients and irradiance.Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci.481136–1144.
8
BatesS. S.GarrisonD. L.HornerR. A. (1998). “Bloom dynamics and physiology of domoic-acid-producing Pseudo-nitzschia species,” inPhysiological ecology of Harmful Algal Blooms, edsAndersonD. M.CembellaA. D.HallegraeffG. (New York, NY: Springer), 267–292.
9
BatesS. S.HubbardK. A.LundholmN.MontresorM.LeawC. P. (2018). Pseudo-nitzschia, Nitzschia, and domoic acid: new research since 2011.Harmful Algae793–43. 10.1016/j.hal.2018.06.001
10
BatesS. S.LegerC.SmithK. M. (1996). “Domoic acid production by the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries as a function of division rate in silicate-limited chemostat culture,” inProceedings of the Harmful and Toxic Algal Blooms: Seventh International Conference on Toxic Phytoplankton, Sendai, Japan, 12-16 July 1995, Sendai.
11
BeardallJ.SobrinoC.StojkovicS. (2009). Interactions between the impacts of ultraviolet radiation, elevated CO2, and nutrient limitation on marine primary producers.Photochem. Photobiol. Sci.81257–1265. 10.1039/b9pp00034h
12
BjrkmanO.DemmigB. J. P. (1987). Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins.Planta.170489–504. 10.1007/BF00402983
13
BoydP. W.CollinsS.DupontS.FabriciusK.GattusoJ. P.HavenhandJ.et al (2018). Experimental strategies to assess the biological ramifications of multiple drivers of global ocean change—a review.Glob. Chang. Biol.242239–2261. 10.1111/gcb.14102
14
CaiX.HutchinsD. A.FuF.GaoK. (2017). Effects of utraviolet radiation on photosynthetic performance and N2 fixation in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS 101.Biogeosciences144455–4466. 10.5194/bg-14-4455-2017
15
ChenJ.WangH.YangA. Q.SiR. R.GuanW. C. (2018). Short-term and diurnal temperature changes alter the response of harmful algal blooms of Pseudo-nitzschia pungens to solar ultraviolet radiation.New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh.5269–81. 10.1080/00288330.2017.1331454
16
CochlanW. P.HerndonJ.KudelaR. M. (2008). Inorganic and organic nitrogen uptake by the toxigenic diatom Pseudo-nitzschia Australis (Bacillariophyceae).Harmful Algae8111–118. 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.008
17
CullenJ. J.LesserM. P. (1991). Inhibition of photosynthesis by ultraviolet radiation as a function of dose and dosage rate: results for a marine diatom.Mar. Biol.111183–190. 10.1007/BF01319699
18
DenmanK. L.GargettA. (1983). Time and space scales of vertical mixing and advection of phytoplankton in the upper ocean.Limnol. Oceanogr.28801–815. 10.4319/lo.1983.28.5.0801
19
Downes-TettmarN.RowlandS.WiddicombeC.WoodwardM.LlewellynC. (2013). Seasonal variation in Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and domoic acid in the Western English Channel.Cont. Shelf. Res.5340–49.
20
DuarteC. M. (2014). Global change and the future ocean: a grand challenge for marine sciences.Front. Mar. Sci.1:63. 10.3389/fmars.2014.00063
21
DugdaleR. C.GoeringJ. J. (1967). Uptake of new and regenerated forms of nitrogen in primary productivity.Limnol. Oceanogr.12196–206. 10.4319/lo.1967.12.2.0196
22
DurhamW. M.StockerR. (2012). Thin phytoplankton layers: characteristics, mechanisms, and consequences.Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci4177–207. 10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100957
23
FehlingJ.DavidsonK.BolchC. J. S.TettP. (2006). Seasonality of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. (Bacillariophyceae) in Western Scottish waters.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.32391–105. 10.3354/meps323091
24
FehlingJ.GreenD. H.DavidsonK.BolchC. J.BatesS. S. (2004). Domoic acid production by Pseudo-nitzschia seriata (Bacillariophyceae) in Scottish waters.J. Phycol.40622–630. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03200.x
25
FuF.-X.TattersA. O.HutchinsD. A. (2012). Global change and the future of harmful algal blooms in the ocean.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.470207–233. 10.3354/meps10047
26
FuF.-X.ZhangY.FengY.HutchinsD. A. (2007). Phosphate and ATP uptake and growth kinetics in axenic cultures of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus CCMP 1334.Eur. J. Phycol.4115–28. 10.1080/09670260500505037
27
GaoK.BeardallJ.HäderD. P.Hall-SpencerJ. M.GaoG.HutchinsD. A. (2019). Effects of ocean acidification on marine photosynthetic organisms under the concurrent influences of warming, UV radiation, and deoxygenation.Front. Mar. Sci.6:322. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00322
28
GaoK.WuY.LiG.WuH.VillafañeV. E.HelblingE. W. (2007a). Solar UV radiation drives CO2 fixation in marine phytoplankton: a double-edged sword.Plant Physiol.14454–59. 10.1104/pp.107.098491
29
GaoK.YuH.BrownM. T. (2007b). Solar PAR and UV radiation affects the physiology and morphology of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120.J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.89117–124. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.09.006
30
GlibertP. M.HarrisonJ.HeilC.SeitzingerS. (2006). Escalating worldwide use of urea - a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication.Biogeochemistry77441–463. 10.1007/s10533-005-3070-5
31
GlibertP. M.SeitzingerS.HeilC. A.BurkholderJ. M.ParrowM. W.CodispotiL. A.et al (2005). The role of eutrophication in the global proliferation of harmful algal blooms.Oceanography18198–209. 10.5670/oceanog.2005.54
32
GoblerC. J. (2020). Climate change and harmful algal blooms: insights and perspective.Harmful Algae911–4. 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101731
33
GodinhoL.SilvaA.BrancoM. A. C.MarquesA.CostaP. R. (2018). Evaluation of intracellular and extracellular domoic acid content in Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries cell cultures under different light regimes.Toxicon15527–31. 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.10.003
34
GodoyN.CanepaA.LasternasS.MayolE.Ruíz-HalpernS.AgustíS.et al (2012). Experimental assessment of the effect of UVB radiation on plankton community metabolism along the Southeastern Pacific off Chile.Biogeosciences91267–1276. 10.5194/bg-9-1267-2012
35
GonçalvesR. J.Sol SouzaM.AigoJ.ModenuttiB.BalseiroE.VillafañeV. E.et al (2010). Responses of plankton and fish from temperate zones to UVR and temperature in a context of global change.Ecol. Austral20129–153.
36
GuanW.GaoK. (2010). Impacts of UV radiation on photosynthesis and growth of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyceae).Environ. Exp. Bot.67502–508. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.08.003
37
GuillardR. R. L. (1975). “Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates,” inCulture of Marine Invertebrate Animals, edsSmithW. L.ChanleyM. H. (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 26–60.
38
GuillardR. R. L.RytherJ. H. (1962). Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea Cleve.Can. J. Microbiol.8229–239. 10.1139/m62-029
39
HalacS.García-MendozaE.BanaszakA. T. (2009). Ultraviolet radiation reduces the photoprotective capacity of the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae, Heterokontophyta).Photochem. Photobiol.85807–815. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00497.x
40
HallegraeffG. M. (1993). A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase.Phycologica3279–99. 10.1016/0025-326X(92)90223-S
41
HargravesP. E.ZhangJ.WangR.ShimizuY. (1993). Growth characteristics of the diatoms Pseudonitzschia pungens and P. fraudulenta exposed to ultraviolet radiation.Hydrobiologia26207–212. 10.1007/BF00028019
42
HeislerJ.GlibertP. M.BurkholderJ. M.AndersonD. M.CochlanW.DennisonW. C.et al (2008). Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus.Harmful Algae83–13. 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006
43
HelblingE. W.GaoK.GonçalvesR. J.WuH.VillafañeV. E. (2003). Utilization of solar UV radiation by coastal phytoplankton assemblages off SE China when exposed to fast mixing.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.25959–66. 10.3354/meps259059
44
HelblingE. W.VillafaneV.FerrarioM.Holm-HansenO. (1992). Impact of natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton species.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.8089–100. 10.3354/meps080089
45
HelblingW. E.BumaA. G. J.BoelenP.van der StrateH. J.GiordaninoV. F. M.VillafañeV. E. (2011). Increase in rubisco activity and gene expression due to elevated temperature partially counteracts ultraviolet radiation-induced photoinhibition in the marine diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii.Limnol. Oceanogr.561330–1342. 10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1330
46
HowardM. D. A.CochlanW. P.LadizinskyN.KudelaR. M. (2007). Nitrogenous preference of toxigenic Pseudo-nitzschia australis (Bacillariophyceae) from field and laboratory experiments.Harmful Algae.6206–217. 10.1016/j.hal.2006.06.003
47
HowardM. D. A.SutulaM.CaronD. A.ChaoY.FarraraJ. D.FrenzelH.et al (2014). Anthropogenic nutrient sources rival natural sources on small scales in the coastal waters of the Southern California Bight.Limnol. Oceanogr.59285–297. 10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0285
48
HutchinsD. A.BrulandK. W. (1998). Iron-limited growth and Si:N ratios in a costal upwelling regime.Nature393561–564. 10.1038/31203
49
HutchinsD. A.FuF. X. (2017). Microorganisms and ocean global change.Nat. Microbiol.21–11. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.58
50
JassbyA. D.PlattT. (1976). Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton.Limnol. Oceanogr.21540–547. 10.4319/lo.1976.21.4.0540
51
KilhamS. S.KottC. L.TilmanD. (1977). Phosphate and silicate kinetics for the Lake Michigan diatom Diatoma Elongatum.J. Great Lakes Res.393–99. 10.1016/S0380-1330(77)72233-6
52
KudelaR. M.LaneJ. Q.CochlanW. P. (2008). The potential role of anthropogenically derived nitrogen in the growth of harmful algae in California, USA.Harmful Algae8103–110. 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.019
53
LangeC. B.ReidF. M. H.VernetM. (1994). Temporal distribution of the potentially toxic diatom Pseudonitzschia australis at a coastal site in Southern California.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.104309–312. 10.3354/meps104309
54
LegrandC.GranéliE.CarlssonP. (1998). Induced phagotrophy in the photosynthetic dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.1565–75. 10.3354/ame015065
55
LelongA.HégaretH.SoudantP.BatesS. S. (2012). Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) species, domoic acid and amnesic shellfish poisoning: revisiting previous paradigms.Phycologica51168–216. 10.2216/11-37
56
LesserM. P. (1996). Acclimation of phytoplankton to UV-B radiation: oxidative stress and photoinhibition of photosynthesis are not prevented by UV-absorbing compounds in the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum micans.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.132287–297. 10.3354/meps132287
57
LiG.GaoK.GaoG. (2011). Differential impacts of solar UV radiation on photosynthetic carbon fixation from the coastal to offshore surface waters in the South China sea.Photochem. Photobiol.87329–334. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00862.x
58
LiJ.GlibertP. M.AlexanderJ. A.MolinaM. E. (2012). Growth and competition of several harmful dinoflagellates under different nutrient and light conditions.Harmful Algae13112–125. 10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.005
59
LiY.GaoK.VillafaneV. E.HelblingE. W. (2012). Ocean acidification mediates photosynthetic response to UV radiation and temperature increase in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.Biogeosciences93931–3942. 10.5194/bg-9-3931-2012
60
LiangY.BeardallJ.HeraudP. (2006). Effects of nitrogen source and UV radiation on the growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and fatty acid composition of Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Chaetoceros muelleri (Bacillariophyceae).J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.82161–172. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.11.002
61
LieferJ. D.GargA.FyfeM. H.IrwinA. J.BennerI.BrownC. M.et al (2019). The macromolecular basis of phytoplankton C:N:P under nitrogen starvation.Front. Microbiol.10:763. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00763
62
LlabrésM.AgustíS. (2006). Picophytoplankton cell death induced by UV radiation: evidence for oceanic Atlantic communities.Limnol. Oceanogr.5121–29. 10.4319/lo.2006.51.1.0021
63
LlabrésM.AgustíS.Alonso-LaitaP.HerndlG. (2010). Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus cell death induced by UV radiation and the penetration of lethal UVR in the Mediterranean Sea.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser39927–37. 10.3354/meps08332
64
LlabrésM.AgustíS.FernándezM.CanepaA.MaurinF.VidalF.et al (2013). Impact of elevated UVB radiation on marine biota: a meta-analysis.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.22131–144. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00784.x
65
LoureiroS.JauzeinC.GarcésE.CollosY.CampJ.VaquéD. (2009). The significance of organic nutrients to Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima (Bacillariophyceae) nutrition.J. Plankton Res.31399–410. 10.1093/plankt/fbn122
66
LundholmN.SkovJ.PocklingtonR.MoestrupO. (1994). Domoic acid, the toxic amino acid responsible for amnesic shellfish poisoning, now in Pseudonitzschia seriata (Bacillariophyceae) in Europe.Phycologica33475–478. 10.2216/i0031-8884-33-6-475.1
67
MaldonadoM. T.HughesM. P.RueE. L.WellsM. L. (2002). The effect of Fe and Cu on growth and domoic acid production by Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries and Pseudo-nitzschia australis.Limnol. Oceanogr.47515–526. 10.4319/lo.2002.47.2.0515
68
Martin-JézéquelV.CaluG.CandelaL.AmzilZ.JauffraisT.SéchetV.et al (2015). Effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen on the growth and production of domoic acid by Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries and P. australis (Bacillariophyceae) in culture.Mar. Drugs137067–7086. 10.3390/md13127055
69
McCabeR. M.HickeyB. M.KudelaR. M.LefebvreK. A.AdamsN. A.BillB. D.et al (2016). An unprecedented coastwide toxic algal bloom linked to anomalous ocean conditions.Geophys. Res. Lett6410366–10376. 10.1002/2016GL070023
70
McKibbenS. M.PetersonW.WoodA. M.TrainerV. L.HunterM.WhiteA. E. (2017). Climatic regulation of the neurotoxin domoic acid.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.114239–244. 10.1073/pnas.1606798114
71
McKibbenS. M.Watkins-BrandtK. S.WoodM. A.HunterM.ForsterZ.HopkinsA.et al (2015). Monitoring Oregon coastal harmful algae: observations and implications of a harmful algal bloom-monitoring project.Harmful Algae5032–44. 10.1016/j.hal.2015.10.004
72
McManusM. A.KudelaR. M.SilverM. W.StewardG. F.DonaghayP. L.SullivanJ. M. (2008). Cryptic blooms: are thin layers the missing connection?Estuar. Coasts.31396–401. 10.1007/s12237-007-9025-4
73
MengeltC.PrézelinB. B. (2005). UVA enhancement of carbon fixation and resilience to UV inhibition in the genus Pseudo-nitzschia may provide a competitive advantage in high UV surface waters.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.30181–93. 10.3354/meps301081
74
MitchellD. L.KarentzD. (1993). “The induction and repair of DNA photodamage in the environment,” inEnvironmental UV Photobiology, eds. YoungA. R.BjörnL. O.MoanJ.NultschW. (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 345–377.
75
National Center for Biotechnology Information (2021). PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5282253, Domoic acid. Available online at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/L-Domoic-acid(accessed March 26, 2021).
76
NealeP. J.LesserM. P.CullenJ. J. (1994). “Effects of ultraviolet radiation on the photosynthesis of phytoplankton in the vicinity of McMurdo Station, Antarctica,” inUltraviolet radiation in Antarctica: Measurements and Biological Effects, edsWeilerC. S.PenhaleP. A. (Washington, D.C: Antarctic Research Series, American Geophysical Union), 125–142.
77
NelsonD. M.TrrguerP.BrzezinskiM. A.LeynaertA.QuéguinerB. (1995). Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation.Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle9359–372. 10.1029/95GB01070
78
NilawatiJ.GreenbergB. M.SmithR. E. H. (1997). Influence of ultraviolet radiation on growth and photosynthesis of two cold ocean diatoms.J. Phycol.33215–224. 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1997.00215.x
79
OlesenA. J.HarðardóttirS.DAugbjergN.AndersenP.LyngsgaardM.KrockB.et al (2020). The impact of urea on toxic diatoms – potential effects of fertilizer silo breakdown on a Pseudo-nitzschia bloom.Harmful algae95:101817.
80
OliverE. C. J.DonatM. G.BurrowsM. T.MooreP. J.SmaleD. A.AlexanderL. V.et al (2018). Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century.Nat. Commun.91–12. 10.1038/s41467-018-03732-9
81
PanY.BatesS. S.CembellaA. D. (1998). Environmental stress and domoic acid production by Pseudo-nitzschia: a physiological perspective.Nat. Toxins6127–135. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199805/08)6
82
PanY.Subba RaoD. V.MannK. H.BrownR. G.PocklingtonR. (1996). Effects of silicate limitation on production of domoic acid, a neurotoxin, by the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries. I. Batch culture studies.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.131225–233. 10.3354/meps131225
83
PerlT. M.BédardL.KosatskyT.HockinJ. C.ToddE. C. D.RemisR. S. (1990). An outbreak of toxic encephalopathy caused by eating mussels contaminated with domoic acid.N. Engl. J. Med.3221775–1780. 10.1056/NEJM199006213222504
84
QuesadaA.MougetJ.VincentW. F. (1995). Growth of Antarctic cyanobacteria under ultraviolet radiation: UVA counteracts UVB inhibition.J. Phycol.31242–248. 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1995.00242.x
85
RadanR. L.CochlanW. P. (2018). Differential toxin response of Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries as a function of nitrogen speciation in batch and continuous cultures, and during a natural assemblage experiment.Harmful Algae7312–29. 10.1016/j.hal.2018.01.002
86
RalphP. J.Macinnis-NgC. M. O.FrankartC. (2005). Fluorescence imaging application: effect of leaf age on seagrass photokinetics.Aquat. Bot.8169–84. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.11.003
87
ReesA. P.HopeS. B.WiddicombeC. E.DixonJ. L.WoodwardE. M. S.FitzsimonsM. F. (2009). Alkaline phosphatase activity in the Western English Channel: elevations induced by high summertime rainfall.Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci.81569–574. 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.12.005
88
RitzmanJ.BrodbeckA.BrostromS.McgrewS.DreyerS.KlingerT.et al (2018). Economic and sociocultural impacts of fisheries closures in two fishing-dependent communities following the massive 2015 U.S. West Coast harmful algal bloom.Harmful Algae8035–45. 10.1016/j.hal.2018.09.002
89
RoncaratiF.RijstenbilJ. W.PistocchiR. (2008). Photosynthetic performance, oxidative damage and antioxidants in Cylindrotheca closterium in response to high irradiance, UVB radiation and salinity.Mar. Biol.153965–973. 10.1007/s00227-007-0868-9
90
SchnetzerA.JonesB. H.SchaffnerR. A.CetinicI.FitzpatrickE.MillerP. E.et al (2013). Coastal upwelling linked to toxic Pseudo-nitzschia australis blooms in Los Angeles coastal waters, 2005-2007.J. Plankton Res.351080–1092. 10.1093/plankt/fbt051
91
SchreiberU.KlughammerC.KolbowskiJ. (2011). High-end chlorophyll fluorescence analysis with the MULTI-COLOR-PAM. I. Various light qualities and their applications.PAM Appl. Notes11–21.
92
SeegersB. N.BirchJ. M.MarinR.ScholinC. A.CaronD. A.SeubertE. L.et al (2015). Subsurface seeding of surface harmful algal blooms observed through the integration of autonomous gliders, moored environmental sample processors, and satellite remote sensing in southern California.Limnol. Oceanogr.60754–764. 10.1002/lno.10082
93
SmithJ.ConnellP.EvansR. H.GelleneA. G.HowardM. D. A.JonesB. H.et al (2018). A decade and a half of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and domoic acid along the coast of southern California.Harmful Algae7987–104. 10.1016/j.hal.2018.07.007
94
SmithR. C.PrézelinB. B.BakerK. S.BidigareR. R.BoucherN. P.ColeyT.et al (1992). Ozone depletion: ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology in Antarctic waters.Science255952–959. 10.1126/science.1546292
95
SmithS. R.DupontC. L.McCarthyJ. K.BroddrickJ. T.OborníkM.HorákA.et al (2019). Evolution and regulation of nitrogen flux through compartmentalized metabolic networks in a marine diatom.Nat. Commun.101–14. 10.1038/s41467-019-12407-y
96
SteinacherM.JoosF.FrölicherT. L.BoppL.CaduleP.CoccoV.et al (2010). Projected 21st century decrease in marine productivity: a multi-model analysis.Biogeosciences7979–1005. 10.5194/bg-7-979-2010
97
SunJ.HutchinsD. A.FengY.SeubertE. L.CaronD. A.FuF.-X. (2011). Effects of changing pCO2 and phosphate availability on domoic acid production and physiology of the marine harmful bloom diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries.Limnol. Oceanogr.56829–840. 10.4319/lo.2011.56.3.0829
98
TantanasaritC.EnglandeA. J.BabelS. (2013). Nitrogen, phosphorus and silicon uptake kinetics by marine diatom Chaetoceros calcitrans under high nutrient concentrations.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.44667–75. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032116
99
TattersA. O.FuF. X.HutchinsD. A. (2012). High CO2 and silicate limitation synergistically increase the toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta.PLoS One7:e32116.
100
TattersA. O.SchnetzerA.XuK.WalworthN. G.FuF.SpackeenJ. L.et al (2018). Interactive effects of temperature, CO2 and nitrogen source on a coastal California diatom assemblage.J. Plankton Res.001–14. 10.1093/plankt/fbx074
101
TedettiM.SempéréR. (2006). Penetration of ultraviolet radiation in the marine environment. A review.Photochem. Photobiol.82389–397. 10.1562/2005-11-09-ir-733
102
ThessenA. E.BowersH. A.StoeckerD. K. (2009). Intra- and interspecies differences in growth and toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia while using different nitrogen sources.Harmful Algae8792–810. 10.1016/j.hal.2009.01.003
103
TrainerV. L.BatesS. S.LundholmN.ThessenA. E.CochlanW. P.AdamsN. G.et al (2012). Pseudo-nitzschia physiological ecology, phylogeny, toxicity, monitoring and impacts on ecosystem health.Harmful Algae14271–300. 10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.025
104
TrainerV. L.KudelaR. M.HunterM. V.AdamsN. G.McCabeR. M. (2020). Climate extreme seeds a new domoic acid hotspot on the US West Coast.Front. Clim.2:571836. 10.3389/fclim.2020.571836
105
Velo-SuárezL.González-GilS.GentienP.LunvenM.BecheminC.FernandL.et al (2008). Thin layers of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. and the fate of Dinophysis acuminata during an upwelling-downwelling cycle in a Galician Ría.Limnol. Oceanogr.531816–1834. 10.4319/lo.2008.53.5.1816
106
VillafañeV. E.GaoK.LiP.LiG.HelblingE. W. (2007). Vertical mixing within the epilimnion modulates UVR-induced photoinhibition in tropical freshwater phytoplankton from southern China.Freshw. Biol.521260–1270. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01762.x
107
WangZ.Maucher-FuquayJ.FireS. E.MikulskiC. M.HaynesB.DoucetteG. J.et al (2012). Optimization of solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of domoic acid in seawater, phytoplankton, and mammalian fluids and tissues.Anal. Chim. Acta.71571–79. 10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.013
108
WilcoxR. R. (2003). Applying Contemporary Statistical Techniques.New York, NY: Academic Press.
109
XuJ.GaoK. (2010). UV-A enhanced growth and UV-B induced positive effects in the recovery of photochemical yield in Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta).J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.100117–122. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.05.010
110
ZhangT.HutchinsD. A.GaoK. (2019). Physiological and biochemical respones of Emiliania huxleyi to ocean acidification and warming are modulated by UV radiation.Hydrobiologia842127–141. 10.1007/s10750-019-04031-0
111
ZhuZ.FuF.-X.QuP.MakE. W. K.JiangH.ZhangR.et al (2020). Interactions between ultraviolet radiation exposure and phosphorus limitation in the marine nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria Trichodesmium and Crocosphaera.Limnol. Oceanogr.65363–376. 10.1002/lno.11304
112
ZhuZ.QuP.FuF. X.TennenbaumN.TattersA. O.HutchinsD. A. (2017). Understanding the blob bloom: warming increases toxicity and abundance of the harmful bloom diatom Pseudo-nitzschia in California coastal waters.Harmful Algae6736–43. 10.1016/j.hal.2017.06.004
Summary
Keywords
multiple drivers, Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, domoic acid, climate change, harmful algal blooms, ultraviolet radiation
Citation
Kelly KJ, Fu F-X, Jiang X, Li H, Xu D, Yang N, DeMers MA, Kling JD, Gao K, Ye N and Hutchins DA (2021) Interactions Between Ultraviolet B Radiation, Warming, and Changing Nitrogen Source May Reduce the Accumulation of Toxic Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries Biomass in Future Coastal Oceans. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:664302. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.664302
Received
04 February 2021
Accepted
31 March 2021
Published
25 May 2021
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Susana Agusti, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by
Pedro R. Costa, Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), Portugal; Carole Anne Llewellyn, Swansea University, United Kingdom
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Kelly, Fu, Jiang, Li, Xu, Yang, DeMers, Kling, Gao, Ye and Hutchins.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: David A. Hutchins, dahutch@usc.eduNaihao Ye, yenh@ysfri.ac.cn
†Present address: Joshua D. Kling, California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California, Berkley, Berkley, CA, United States
‡These authors share last authorship
This article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.