Abstract
As the devastating impacts of global climate change and local anthropogenic stressors on shallow-water coral reefs are expected to rise, mesophotic coral ecosystems have increasingly been regarded as potential lifeboats for coral survival, providing a source of propagules to replenish shallower reefs. Yet, there is still limited knowledge of the capacity for coral larvae to adjust to light intensities that change with depth. This study elucidates the mechanisms underlying plasticity during early life stages of the coral Porites astreoides that enable survival across broad depth gradients. We examined physiological and morphological variations in larvae from shallow (8–10 m) and mesophotic (45 m) reefs in Bermuda, and evaluated differences in survival, settlement patterns and size among recruits depending on light conditions using a reciprocal ex situ transplantation experiment. Larvae released from mesophotic adults were found to have significantly lower respiration rates and were significantly larger than those derived from shallow adults, indicating higher content of energetic resources and suggesting a greater dispersal potential for mesophotic larvae compared to their shallow counterparts. Additionally, larvae released from mesophotic adults experienced higher settlement success and larger initial spat size compared to larvae from shallow adults, demonstrating a potential connection between parental origin, offspring quality, and recruitment success. Although both shallow and mesophotic larvae exhibited the capacity to survive and settle under reciprocal light conditions, all larvae had higher survival under mesophotic light conditions regardless of parental origin, suggesting that conditions experienced under low light may enable longer larval life, further extending the dispersal period. These results indicate that larvae from mesophotic Porites astreoides colonies are likely capable of reseeding shallow reefs in Bermuda, thereby supporting the Deep Reef Refugia Hypothesis.
Introduction
By creating complex 3-dimensional calcium carbonate frameworks, reef building corals support the most productive and biologically diverse marine ecosystems on Earth. Coral reefs are not only a critical habitat for a wide variety of species, but also provide indispensable ecosystem services for millions of people (). Despite their great importance, coral reefs are facing significant challenges due to human activities (e.g., pollution, overfishing, and the physical destruction of reefs) (). In addition, changes in environmental features determined by ocean warming and seawater acidification are seriously threatening the survival of entire coral reef ecosystems (). Coral losses are particularly pronounced on shallow water reef systems, where corals and their dinoflagellate symbionts live close to their physiological thermal maximum, and as a result, warming of 1°C or more can significantly reduce their fitness and cause whole-colony mortality (; ). However, coral reefs extend far beyond the well-studied shallow reef zones into Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems (MCEs) ranging from 30 m depth down to depths potentially greater than 170 m (; ). In the last few years, MCEs have gained significant interest as they appear not to have experienced the same trend in coral decline as their shallow-water counterparts, displaying relatively stable coral populations over time (). Thus, it is hypothesized that MCEs may act as refugia for corals, serving as potential sources to reseed shallower reefs through larval exchange and thereby increasing overall reef resilience [termed the Deep Reef Refugia Hypothesis “DRRH”; (; )].
Resilience of ecosystems under rapid environmental change relies, in part, on the capacity of organisms to adapt and/or acclimatize to new conditions. From shallow to mesophotic depths, wide variations in light intensity shape different physiological, morphological and gene expression patterns in both the coral and the algal symbiont (; ; ; ; ). For instance, differences in photosynthetic efficiency have been observed in the algal endosymbionts between shallow and mesophotic corals (). Moreover, coral larvae and recruits from different light environments significantly differ in size (; ) and possess differential recruitment patterns (). These wide variations among conspecifics are recurrently suggested to result from plasticity in response to differing environmental conditions at depth, such as light intensity changes (). Nevertheless, there is still limited knowledge of the physiological and morphological contributors that underlie such plasticity, particularly in early life stages. This reduces our capacity to adequately assess the ability of mesophotic larvae to survive under higher light intensities and replenish shallower reefs.
If MCEs are in fact an important lifeboat for coral survival, it is imperative to evaluate the degree of physiological plasticity of coral larvae that would enable them to successfully migrate and settle across wide depth gradients, as successful settlement is fundamental to coral population dynamics as well as reef community structure (). We assessed this plasticity in the reef-building coral Porites astreoides, a hermaphroditic, brooding species () that inhabits large environmental clines () and exhibits high phenotypic plasticity at various life stages (). This Atlantic coral is common throughout the Caribbean and Western Atlantic with a broad depth distribution, ranging from 0 to 50 m (; ). In Bermuda, P. astreoides is a main contributor to reef community structure and is ubiquitously distributed across the lagoon and rim reef zones, with relative frequency decreasing with increasing depth beyond 20 m (; ; ). Due to the high levels of fecundity and settlement success, P. astreoides is considered a resilient species (; ). Additionally, variable bleaching responses and different host gene expression patterns between inshore and offshore populations exposed to heat stress suggest that P. astreoides may be able to acclimatize or adapt to thermal stress (,; ). Across a depth gradient, this species was also found to have similar thermal tolerance ranges, despite variable thermal histories, suggesting high levels of plasticity to temperature (). Consequently, P. astreoides is expected to increase in relative abundance compared to other Atlantic scleractinian species (), and is therefore an ideal study species as it will likely be an important contributor to the future community composition of Caribbean and Western Atlantic reefs. Importantly, this species was also found to maintain high degrees of genetic connectivity in Bermuda across inshore and offshore sites that ranged in depth from 4 to 26 m (), and multiple studies have described Symbiodinium spp. [ITS2 type A4; ()] as the dominant symbiont in P. astreoides in Bermuda (; ; ; ). Thus, there is strong support for host and symbiont homogeneity in Bermuda across depths enabling comparisons of phenotypic response to environmental conditions.
In this study, we examined physiological and morphological characteristics of P. astreoides larvae released from shallow (8–10 m) and mesophotic (45 m) adults and, through a reciprocal ex situ transplantation experiment, we assessed differences in survival, settlement patterns and size among recruits depending on settlement light conditions. With this approach, we elucidated the mechanisms underlying the plasticity of P. astreoides early life stages that enables them to survive across broad depth gradients. The existence of such plasticity increases the probability of effective connectivity between shallow and mesophotic depths, ultimately advancing our understanding of these ecosystems and the potential for MCEs to serve as refugia.
Materials and Methods
Site Selection
Two study sites on the north Atlantic Bermuda platform were selected for this study: a rim reef (Hog Shallow; 8–10 m depth; 32°27′26″N, 64°50′05″W), and a mesophotic reef (Hog Deep; 45 m depth; 32°29′18″N, 64°51′18″W) (Figure 1). Mesophotic (∼45 m) Bermudian coral reefs have been characterized as a light and nutrient-limited environment with colder temperatures compared to shallow reefs (). Temperature (°C) was measured from early June 2019 through mid August 2019 using HOBO water temperature ProV2 loggers deployed on the benthos at 10, 30, 45, and 60 m. Temperatures were found to be consistently lower at deeper depths throughout the summer, but converged toward the peak of the summer (Figure 1). Maximum temperature at the shallow site (10 m) peaked at 28.9°C, compared to 26.8°C at the mesophotic site (45 m).
FIGURE 1
Larval Collection
The reproductive timing of P. astreoides has been relatively well studied in Bermuda. This brooding species is capable of both self-fertilization and outcrossing () and releases symbiotic larvae in accordance with the lunar cycle (). In Bermuda, the planula release period of P. astreoides occurs over several days beginning up to 10 days before the new moons of July, August, and September (), enabling predictable larval collections.
A total of 20 adult colonies with a minimum surface area of 170 cm2 were randomly chosen and collected for this experiment using a hammer and chisel (PSLicenses #2019061407): 10 from the shallow reef (10 m depth) and 10 from the mesophotic reef (45 m depth; Figure 1), 9 days prior to the July new moon (22 July 2019). Any minimal differences in surface area are not expected to affect reproductive patterns, as it has been shown that there is no significant relationship between numbers of planulae released and the surface areas of reproductive colonies of P. astreoides in Bermuda ().
Adult corals were transferred to the outdoor mesocosm at the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS) where they were maintained in 400-L flow tanks under ambient temperature conditions. Temperature was recorded in the mesocosm tanks daily using a HOBO onset data logger on 1-min intervals (27.6°C ± 0.004, shallow; 27.5°C ± 0.005, mesophotic). To reduce light stress and maintain temperature controls, water level heights of ∼45 cm above the colony surface were maintained during the day. All corals experienced a natural light period. Mesophotic colonies were covered with a single layer of light filter (Lagoon Blue, ©LEE Filters) to mimic mesophotic light levels, while shallow colonies were left uncovered. Daily light readings using a PME miniPAR logger were recorded for each condition between 12:00 and 13:00 over the period that corals were in the mesocosm (10 days; Table 1). In situ light measurements from the collection sites were taken every 30 s for a period of 3–4 min between 12:00 and 13:00 at depths of 10 m and 45 m on the day of coral collections using a Li-COR sensor on a stable frame with a 100 m fiber optic cable (Table 1).
TABLE 1
| In situ | Ex situ | |
| Shallow (10 m/no shade) | 392 ± 0.92 | 444 ± 36.9 |
| Mesophotic (45 m/Lagoon Blue Filter) | 124 ± 0.16 | 139 ± 0.89 |
Mean PAR (μmol/s m2) readings taken on in situ drops using a Li-COR PAR sensor at 10 m and 45 m, and ex situ in the mesocosm using a PME miniPAR logger in unshaded and light-filtered conditions.
Larval collections occurred from July 24 to July 26, 2019. During the larval collection period, tank water levels were dropped at night and individual colonies were placed into 2-L plastic separated jugs with individual lines of flowing seawater. An 800 mL polypropylene beaker with a 153 μm mesh bottom was placed under the spout of each container to collect the positively buoyant larvae following the methods of . Every morning, all larvae released from each colony were collected with a clear transfer pipette and pooled by reef depth. On the final day of larval collections (July 26, 2019), subsamples of the pooled larvae were used to quantify larval volume, respiration, and settlement success. By pooling larvae across the 3 collection days, variations in parameters were only assessed at the population level and thus the effects of individual colony or lunar day of release were not evaluated in this study.
Larval Sizing
Larvae from samples pooled by depth were randomly sub-sampled (n = 41, shallow; n = 19 mesophotic) and digitally photographed from a side view (elliptical in shape) using a MicroViewer camera (Mighty Scope 5M, Aven Tools). Larval volume was determined by measuring the length and width of the longitudinal and transverse axes in ImageJ and applying the equation for volume of an elliptical sphere, V = 4/3 πab2, where a is 1/2 the width and b is 1/2 the length (). Larval volumes met the assumptions of normality (Shapiro–Wilk’s test) and homogeneity (Levene’s test) and were compared by parental depth using an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey’s HSD post hoc test performed in RStudio v1.2.5001 () using the “aov” function in the package “car” ().
Larval Respiration
Larval respiration was quantified using a sensor dish reader (SDR) and 24 80 μL-well microplate system (Loligo Systems) and recorded using PreSens-SDR software. Ten wells were filled with planulae from mesophotic corals (n = 30 larvae, 3 per well), ten wells were filled with planulae from rim corals (n = 40 larvae, 4 per well), and four wells were filled with filtered seawater to be used as blanks. One blank well was also used to monitor temperature with a Thermocoupler probe (Fluke 80PJ-1 Bead Probe). Due to observed differences in larval size, fewer mesophotic larvae were used per well to allow for adequate swimming space, prevent rapid oxygen depletion and standardize total larval volume within each well. The wells were sealed with Parafilm and the entire SDR system was placed in an incubator set to 27°C. Oxygen concentration and internal plate temperature were recorded every 15 s over a 20-min trial. Following the respiration trials, larvae were fixed in 10% formalin and volume (mm3) was determined using the methods described above. The sum larval volume was then calculated for each microplate well.
Raw data from respirometry trials were filtered to remove oxygen concentration measurements below 70% air saturation. Wells with less than 4 min of data were discarded. Respiration rate for each plate well was determined using a least squares linear regression of oxygen concentration against time in R v.4.0.2 () with the package “LoLinR” (v0.0.0.9000; ). Sample respiration rates were normalized using the mean blank rate. Rates were calculated per unit of larval volume (nmol O2 min–1 mm–3) rather than per larva as individual larval size differed significantly between the two depths. Several previous studies have normalized respiration to number of larvae (; ; ) rather than larval volume, however, these studies were not comparing larvae from different adult cohorts that differed significantly in size. Alternatively, compared size-normalized respiration rates of larvae from parental colonies with differing thermal histories due to differences in larval size between treatments. Metabolic rates are documented to correlate directly with larval size in other marine invertebrates (; ), and thus, while it is possible that our approach to normalize respiration to larval volume may have biased our results, significant differences in larval volume between depths suggests that normalization to organism size provides a more accurate comparison of physiological traits for these data.
Larval respiration data were assessed for normality and variance homogeneity using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s F-test to ensure t-test assumptions had been met. Group means were compared using a two-sample t-test.
Settlement Success
A total of 60 mesophotic larvae and 222 shallow larvae were randomly sub-sampled and used for ex situ settlement experiments. The sub-sampled larvae from each reef site were transferred into individual 0.5-L plastic settlement chambers containing two plastic settlement plugs (n = 37 shallow; n = 10 mesophotic, larvae per chamber). Plugs were preconditioned on an inshore patch reef for approximately 1 month prior to use to allow them to acquire a mixed cover of calcareous algae, bacterial communities and other organisms. Three replicate chambers from each origin depth were placed under each ex situ light condition (unshaded shallow vs. light filtered mesophotic; Table 1). Settlement chamber design followed , where containers were covered with 150 μm mesh to facilitate water flow but prevent larvae from escaping. Settlement containers were randomly placed in flow-through filtered seawater tanks on an outdoor wet-bench and kept fully submerged for the duration of the experiment. After 72 h, the settlement containers were removed and percent settlement was determined using a dissecting microscope. Settlement was defined as the metamorphic transformation from planula to primary polyp (appearance of primary septa) as in . Larval settlement and survival met the assumption of normality and variance homogeneity (Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s F-test, α = 0.05), and were compared using a two-way ANOVA for the interactive effects of parental origin and settlement light conditions followed by a Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. Statistical analyses were performed in RStudio v1.1.423 (R Development Team) using the “aov” function in the package “car” ().
Results
Larval Physiology
Mean larval volume differed significantly by site of parental origin (p < 0.001; ANOVA), where larvae released by colonies originating from the mesophotic reef site were larger than those released from colonies originating from the shallow reef site (Figure 2). Rate of respiration also differed significantly between experimental treatments (p < 0.001; ANOVA), where respiration rates based on total larval volume were higher for wells containing larvae released by shallow colonies compared to those released by mesophotic colonies (Figure 3).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Larval Settlement and Survival
Settlement success differed significantly by depth of parental origin (p = 0.007; ANOVA), where percent of settlement success relative to total number of larvae per chamber was higher in chambers containing larvae released by mesophotic corals than those released by shallow corals. Settlement success did not differ between settlement light conditions (Figure 4A; p = 0.117; ANOVA), and there was no significant effect of the interaction of parental depth and settlement light conditions on settlement success (p = 0.123; ANOVA).
FIGURE 4
Larval survival, which includes settled spat and swimming larvae, did not differ significantly by depth of parental origin (p = 0.511; ANOVA) but did differ significantly by settlement light conditions (p = 0.017; ANOVA). However, there was no effect of the interaction of parental depth and settlement light conditions on larval survival (Figure 4B; p = 0.408; ANOVA). Larvae settled under mesophotic light conditions had higher survival than those settled under shallow light conditions, regardless of parental origin.
Juvenile Size
Mean surface area of newly settled spat differed significantly based on depth of parental origin (p < 0.001; ANOVA), where juvenile spat originating from mesophotic parental colonies were larger than those from shallow colonies (Figure 5). Mean surface area of newly settled spat also differed significantly by settled light conditions (p < 0.001; ANOVA), where juvenile spat settled under mesophotic reef light conditions were larger than those settled under shallow reef light conditions. The interaction of parental depth and settlement light conditions did not significantly affect juvenile size (p = 0.684).
FIGURE 5
Discussion
The persistence of coral reefs under global environmental change is built upon larval survival and settlement success. Evaluating the phenotypic diversity and plasticity of coral larvae is fundamental to understand their range of environmental tolerance. P. astreoides larvae originating from shallow and mesophotic corals show clear differences in physiological and morphological traits, likely stemming from adaptation to different light environments experienced during the brooding period. Larvae released from mesophotic colonies have significantly lower respiration rates per unit biomass than those derived from shallow colonies (Figure 3). Decreased coral respiration rate appears to be linked to lower availability of photosynthetically fixed carbon at light-limited mesophotic depths (). Low metabolic rates of coral larvae are proposed to significantly extend dispersal potential, enhancing population connectivity (). Likewise, a larger larval size allows for longer planktonic periods, enabling coral larvae to disperse farther (; ; ). In this study, larvae released from mesophotic colonies were found to be significantly larger than those released from shallow colonies (Figure 2), which suggests higher content of energetic resources in larvae of mesophotic origin, as larval size often correlates with energetic content in the form of maternally derived lipids (; ; ). Active swimming represents the major energetic cost during marine invertebrates’ larval stages (), and in coral larvae this energy may be acquired from lipid catabolism (). In addition, lipids within coral larvae are used for buoyancy and as an energy source to sustain longer periods in the plankton (; ). Considering that phytoplankton availability and light-dependent productivity markedly decrease with depth (), a high content of maternally derived lipid stores could significantly support metabolic requirements of mesophotic larvae. Collectively, these observations suggest that P. astreoides larvae of mesophotic origin possess a greater dispersal potential compared to their shallow counterparts. In fact, as previously hypothesized for P. astreoides larvae in Bermuda, the smaller size of shallow larvae may infer a shortage of energetic reserves, which could lead to lower rates of competency and survival (; ). However, P. astreoides larvae acquire Symbiodinium through vertical transmission, enabling direct translocation of photosynthate as an energy source that can likely sustain the higher metabolic rates of shallow larvae (). Further examinations of larval lipid content and stable isotopes to determine rates of reliance on heterotrophy versus autotrophy in larvae from differing parental depths may help elucidate variations in larval duration and dispersal potential.
Larvae in the water column can change buoyancy in response to light intensity, in order to maximize the chance of finding the substratum at the optimal depth for recruitment (). This indicates that the light environment varying with depth is a crucial element controlling the survival and successful settlement of coral larvae. In this study, P. astreoides larvae of both shallow and mesophotic origin exhibit the potential to adjust to wide differences in light intensity, by displaying the capacity to survive and successfully settle under reciprocal light settlement conditions (Figure 4). Furthermore, their phenotypic plasticity allowed larvae of both shallow and mesophotic parental origin to develop differential juvenile size based on the light environment encountered upon settlement (Figure 5).
Coral depth distribution largely correlates with light gradients and is highly influenced by the differing light tolerance and photosynthetic properties of their endosymbiotic algae (; ). Previous studies on the same species in Bermuda found that while densities of zooxanthellae cells within larvae of upper-mesophotic origin (30 m) were higher than those of shallow inshore patch reef origin (5 m), zooxanthellae densities did not differ between larvae from upper-mesophotic and rim reef origin (10 m) (). The ability of P. astreoides larvae to successfully adjust to differing light environments observed in this study, therefore, might stem from the endosymbionts’ photo-acclimatory potential. In fact, corals hosting symbionts in the genus Symbiodinium (formerly clade A; ), which is the dominant type in P. astreoides in Bermuda across depths (; ; ; ), have been shown to possess high resistance to light variations () and to be less susceptible to bleaching (). In addition, Symbiodinium spp. symbionts abundantly produce UV-protective amino acids that prevent damage to the photosynthetic apparatus due to changes in light intensity (). The colonization of a wide range of light environments may not only be determined by the endosymbionts’ photosynthetic plasticity, but also from the ability of corals to modulate their tissue light field by either filtering out excess light that can be harmful to the algae (i.e., in high-light conditions), or by increasing the photon flux reaching the algae (i.e., in low-light conditions) (). As such, a combination of host-symbiont phenotypic plasticity might be at the root of the capacity of P. astreoides larvae to colonize highly different light environments.
Overall, low light conditions appear to promote both higher survival and settlement of P. astreoides larvae (Figure 4). Under shallow light conditions, larvae from shallow adults experienced lower survival and settlement success compared to those from mesophotic adults, in accordance with previous observations by . Coral recruitment is known to be influenced by several physical characteristics varying with depth, with light representing one of the most critical factors (; ). Sufficient light quality and intensity are required for photosynthesis, however, at shallow depths, light levels may be too high for young coral settlers () leading to settlement in more cryptic sites (). In addition, larval settlement is significantly influenced by recruit density, with fewer larvae settling in preferred locations as density increases (). Thus, if larval densities are too high, cryptic and shaded space availability might be limited, leading to fewer larvae settling. As such, the higher density of larvae in the shallow settlement chambers may have negatively affected settlement success. However, this is unlikely as previous experiments using similarly sized chambers and available substrate with equal larval densities found analagous results, with higher settlement by upper-mesophotic larvae compared to shallow larvae (). Larval settlement is also documented to be driven in part by the benthic community, specifically the presence of crustose coralline algae (; ) and a bacterial film (). found that substrate type significantly influenced settlement choice by shallow and mesophotic larvae in the Red Sea, where larvae preferentially settled onto tiles conditioned at the corresponding depth of parental origin. Settlement tiles used in the present study, however, were all conditioned in a common garden environment on a nearshore shallow patch reef where conditions did not directly correspond to either site of parental origin, thereby reducing potential effects associated with tile conditioning.
Recruitment success of lecithotrophic coral larvae is largely influenced by larval size, with smaller larvae (i.e., less energetic reserves) translating to lower competency and survival (), and lower recruit sizes leading to decreased post-settlement survivorship (). Collectively, our results indicate that offspring quality and settlement success are deeply interconnected, and show an increase in larval fitness with increasing reef depth and decreasing light. These results suggest that differential quality of larvae released from shallow and mesophotic adults may be related to latent effects of parental history. For many animals, the environment experienced by parents influences the phenotype and fitness of their offspring, in a process known as “parental effects” (; ; ). Such parental effects influence the development of coral larvae and the recruits’ fitness (; ; ; ; ). Therefore, the increased performance of mesophotic offspring observed in this study may be due to the higher stability of environmental conditions experienced by mesophotic parental colonies during the brooding period, compared to consistently higher temperatures experienced by the adults on shallow reefs (Figure 1; ). Furthermore, shallow reefs in Bermuda are more likely impacted by anthropogenic activities (), which can also reduce the fitness of shallow adult colonies. Parental effects have been indicated as major factors limiting coral larval dispersal across depths as larvae may be adapted to the conditions experienced by their parent (), however, our findings show that offspring plasticity also plays a crucial role in shaping coral capacity to colonize differing environments. Yet, the density of adult P. astreoides colonies on shallow and mesophotic reefs in Bermuda does not reflect a pattern of increased recruitment to mesophotic depth, as adult colony frequency is documented to decrease with increasing depth (). This apparent disconnect may be related to post-recruitment mortality and the adaptive potential of individual settlers, which were not assessed in this study. Future studies that follow post-recruitment survival in situ and examine variations in genomic responses through early life history stages at differing depths may better elucidate the mechanisms underlying these discrepancies and potential influences of parental effects.
A greater dispersal potential combined with the ability to survive and settle under a range of light conditions indicates that P. astreoides larvae from mesophotic reefs are likely capable of reseeding shallow reefs in Bermuda, thereby supporting the Deep Reef Refugia Hypothesis. Importantly, the higher settlement success of mesophotic larvae under shallow light conditions compared to shallow larvae under mesophotic light conditions suggests that recruitment may preferentially occur up the slope (mesophotic to shallow) rather than down the slope (shallow to mesophotic). These results oppose previous observations of asymmetric gene flow (; ; ) and larval settlement patterns () occurring from shallow to deeper reefs. Nevertheless, the higher reproductive success observed for mesophotic corals in the Western Atlantic (; ) and subsequent larval effective recruitment found in the present study suggest that mesophotic reefs likely represent a significant source of propagules across the depth gradient and may aid in the recovery of degraded shallow reefs in Bermuda. Thus, mesophotic corals appear to be important contributors to the resilience of Bermuda’s reef ecosystems, which highlights the importance of establishing management strategies aimed at protecting mesophotic reefs. Future research assessing larval dispersal potential and recruitment success in situ is warranted to provide accurate data on population dynamics for mesophotic and shallow corals. Such studies will inform effective management of the ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by connected coral reef communities.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
GG-G and TM designed and conducted the research. HN, GG-G, SM, SE, AC, and TM performed the underwater collection and ex situ experiments. RJ carried out the respiration experiments. GG-G, FS, and TM wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to improving, revision, and approval of the manuscript.
Funding
This project received funding from the United States National Science Foundation and United States – Israel Binational Science Foundation (NSF #1937770 to GG-G and BSF #2019653 to TM), a Grant-in-Aid award from BIOS, and the BIOS REU program from the National Science Foundation’s Diversity of Ocean Sciences (NSF #1757475).
Acknowledgments
We thank Alexander Hunter and the Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences, for facilitating technical SCUBA diving in Bermuda. We also thank Kevin Wong and Danielle Becker for their assistance with maintaining corals in the mesocosm and Hollie Putnam for use of the larval respiration set up and guidance with respiration data analysis. This work was conducted under permission from the Bermuda Government Department of Environment and Natural Resources permit #2019061407.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BabcockR.MundyC. (1996). Coral recruitment: consequences of settlement choice for early growth and survivorship in two scleractinians.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.206179–201. 10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02622-6
2
BadyaevA. V.UllerT. (2009). Parental effects in ecology and evolution: mechanisms, processes and implications.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.3641169–1177. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0302
3
BakR. P. M.EngelM. S. (1979). Distribution, abundance and survival of juvenile hermatypic corals (Scleractinia) and the importance of life history strategies in the parent coral community.Mar. Biol.54341–352. 10.1007/BF00395440
4
BakR. P. M.NieuwlandG.MeestersE. H. (2005). Coral reef crisis in deep and shallow reefs: 30 years of constancy and change in reefs of Curacao and Bonaire.Coral Reefs24475–479. 10.1007/s00338-005-0009-1
5
BanaszakA. T.Barba SantosM. G.LaJeunesseT. C.LesserM. P. (2006). The distribution of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) and the phylogenetic identity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in cnidarian hosts from the Mexican Caribbean.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.337131–146. 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.014
6
BongaertsP.RidgwayT.SampayoE. M.Hoegh-GuldbergO. (2010). Assessing the “deep reef refugia” hypothesis: focus on Caribbean reefs.Coral Reefs29309–327. 10.1007/s00338-009-0581-x
7
BongaertsP.RiginosC.BrunnerR.EnglebertN.SmithS. R.Hoegh-GuldbergO. (2017). Deep reefs are not universal refuges: reseeding potential varies among coral species.Sci. Adv.3:e1602373. 10.1126/sciadv.1602373
8
BongaertsP.RiginosC.HayK. B.van OppenM. J. H.Hoegh-GuldbergO.DoveS. (2011). Adaptive divergence in a scleractinian coral: physiological adaptation of Seriatopora hystrix to shallow and deep reef habitats.BMC Evol. Biol.11:303. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-303
9
BrazeauD. A.GleasonD. F.MorganM. E. (1998). Self-fertilization in brooding hermaphroditic Caribbean corals: evidence from molecular markers.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.231225–238. 10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00097-5
10
BurkeL.ReytarK.SpaldingM.PerryA. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. World Resources Institute, 114: 1–130.
11
CameronK. A.HarrisonP. L. (2020). Density of coral larvae can influence settlement, post-settlement colony abundance and coral cover in larval restoration.Sci. Rep.10:5488. 10.1038/s41598-020-62366-4
12
ChamberlandV. F.LatijnhouwersK. R. W.HuismanJ.HartmannA. C.VermeijM. J. A. (2017). Costs and benefits of maternally inherited algal symbionts in coral larvae.Proc. Biol. Sci.284:20170852. 10.1098/rspb.2017.0852
13
ChorneskyE. A.PetersE. C. (1987). Sexual reproduction and colony growth in the scleractinian coral Porites astreoides.Biol. Bull.172161–177. 10.2307/1541790
14
CumboV. R.EdmundsP. J.WallC. B.FanT. Y. (2013). Brooded coral larvae differ in their response to high temperature and elevated pCO2 depending on the day of release.Mar. Bio.1602903–2917. 10.1007/s00227-013-2280-y
15
de PutronS. J.LawsonJ. M.WhiteK. Q. L.CostaM. T.GeronimusM. V. B.MacCarthyA. (2017). Variation in larval properties of the Atlantic brooding coral Porites astreoides between different reef sites in Bermuda.Coral Reefs36383–393. 10.1007/s00338-016-1527-8
16
de PutronS. J.SmithS. R. (2011). Planula release and reproductive seasonality of the scleractinian coral Porites astreoides in Bermuda, a high-latitude reef.Bull. Mar. Sci.8775–90. 10.5343/bms.2009.1027
17
DixonG. B.DaviesS. W.AglyamovaG. V.MeyerE.BayL. K.MatzM. V. (2015). Genomic determinants of coral heat tolerance across latitudes.Science3481460–1462. 10.1126/science.1261224
18
EdmundsP. J.CumboV. R.FanT. Y. (2011). Effects of temperature on the respiration of brooded larvae from tropical reef corals.J. Exp. Biol.2142783–2790. 10.1242/jeb.055343
19
EinbinderS.GruberD. F.SalomonE.LiranO.KerenN.TchernovD. (2016). Novel adaptive photosynthetic characteristics of mesophotic symbiotic microalgae within the reef-building coral, Stylophora pistillata.Front. Mar. Sci.3:195. 10.3389/fmars.2016.00195
20
Elizalde-RendónE. M.Horta-PugaG.González-DiazP.Carricart-GanivetJ. P. (2010). Growth characteristics of the reef-building coral Porites astreoides under different environmental conditions in the Western Atlantic.Coral Reefs29607–614. 10.1007/s00338-010-0604-7
21
FigueiredoJ.BairdA. H.CohenM. F.FlotJ.-F.KamikiT.MezianeT.et al (2012). Ontogenetic change in the lipid and fatty acid composition of scleractinian coral larvae.Coral Reefs31613–619. 10.1007/s00338-012-0874-3
22
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2019). An {R} companion to Applied Regression, 3rd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
23
FrickeH.MeischnerD. (1985). Depth limits of Bermudan scleractinian corals: a submersible survey.Mar. Biol.88175–187. 10.1007/BF00397165
24
GleasonD. F.HofmannD. K. (2011). Coral larvae: from gametes to recruits.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.40842–57. 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.025
25
Goodbody-GringleyG. (2010). Diel planulation by the brooding coral Favia fragum (Esper, 1797).J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.38970–74. 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.03.016
26
Goodbody-GringleyG.MarchiniC.ChequerA. D.GoffredoS. (2015). Population structure of Montastraea cavernosa on shallow versus mesophotic reefs in Bermuda.PLoS One10:e0142427. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142427
27
Goodbody-GringleyG.NoyesT.SmithS. R. (2019). “Bermuda,” in Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems Coral Reefs of the World, edsLoyaY.PugliseK.BridgeT. (Berlin: Springer).
28
Goodbody-GringleyG.WaletichJ. (2018). Morphological plasticity of the depth generalist coral, Montastraea cavernosa, on mesophotic reefs in Bermuda.Ecology991688–1690. 10.1002/ecy.2232
29
Goodbody-GringleyG.WongK. H.BeckerD. M.GlennonK.de PutronS. J. (2018). Reproductive ecology and early life history traits of the brooding coral, Porites astreoides, from shallow to mesophotic zones.Coral Reefs37483–494. 10.1007/s00338-018-1673-2
30
GouldK.BrunoJ. B.JuR.Goodbody-GringleyG. (2021). Upper-mesophotic and shallow reef corals exhibit similar thermal tolerance, sensitivity and optima.Coral Reefs40907–920. 10.1007/s00338-021-02095-w
31
GrahamE. M.BairdA. H.WillisB. L.ConnollyS. R. (2013). Effects of delayed settlement on post-settlement growth and survival of scleractinian coral larvae.Oecologia173431–438. 10.1007/s00442-013-2635-6
32
GreenD. H.EdmundsP. J.CarpenterR. C. (2008). Increasing relative abundance of Porites astreoides on Caribbean reefs mediated by an overall decline in coral cover.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.3591–10. 10.3354/meps07454
33
HariiS.NadaokaK.YamamotoM.IwaoK. (2007). Temporal changes in settlement, lipid content and lipid composition of larvae of the spawning hermatypic coral Acropora tenuis.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.34689–96. 10.3354/meps07114
34
HartmannA. C.MarhaverK. L.ChamberlandV. F.SandinS. A.VermeijM. J. A. (2013). Large birth size does not reduce negative latent effects of harsh environments across life stages in two coral species.Ecology941966–1976. 10.1890/13-0161.1
35
HindersteinL. M.MarrJ. C. A.MartinezF. A.DowgialloM. J.PugliseK. A.PyleR. L.et al (2010). Theme section on “Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems: characterization, Ecology, and Management.”.Coral Reefs29247–251. 10.1007/s00338-010-0614-5
36
Hoegh-GuldbergO. (1999). Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs.Mar. Freshw. Res.50839–866. 10.1071/mf99078
37
Hoegh-GuldbergO.PoloczanskaE. S.SkirvingW.DoveS. (2017). Coral reef ecosystems under climate change and ocean acidification.Front. Mar. Sci.4:158. 10.3389/fmars.2017.00158
38
HolsteinD. M.SmithT. B.GyoryJ.ParisC. B. (2015). Fertile fathoms: deep reproductive refugia for threatened shallow corals.Sci. Rep.5:12407. 10.1038/srep12407
39
Iglesias-PrietoR.BeltránV. H.LaJeunesseT. C.Reyes-BonillaH.ThoméP. E. (2004). Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant reef corals in the eastern Pacific.Proc. Biol. Sci.2711757–1763. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2757
40
IsomuraN.NishihiraM. (2001). Size variation of planulae and its effect on the lifetime of planulae in three pocilloporid corals.Coral Reefs20309–315. 10.1007/s003380100180
41
JonesR. J. (2008). Coral bleaching, bleaching-induced mortality, and the adaptive significance of the bleaching response.Mar. Biol.15465–80. 10.1007/s00227-007-0900-0
42
KenkelC. D.Goodbody-GringleyG.CaillaudD.DaviesS. W.BartelsE.MatzM. V. (2013a). Evidence for a host role in thermotolerance divergence between populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different reef environments.Mol. Ecol.224335–4348. 10.1111/mec.12391
43
KenkelC. D.MeyerE.MatzM. V. (2013b). Gene expression under chronic heat stress in populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different thermal environments.Mol. Ecol.224322–4334. 10.1111/mec.12390
44
KenkelC. D.SettaS. P.MatzM. V. (2015). Heritable differences in fitness-related traits among populations of the mustard hill coral.Porites Astreoides Heredity115509–516. 10.1038/hdy.2015.52
45
LaJeunesseT. C.BhagooliR.HidakaM.deVantierL.DoneT.SchmidtG. W.et al (2004). Closely related Symbiodinium spp. differ in relative dominance in coral reef host communities across environmental, latitudinal and biogeographic gradients.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.284147–161. 10.3354/meps284147
46
LaJeunesseT. C.ParkinsonJ. E.GabrielsonP. W.JeongH. J.ReimerJ. D.VoolstraC. R.et al (2018). Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts.Curr. Biol.282570.e6–2580.e6. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.008
47
LesserM. P.SlatteryM.MobleyC. D. (2018). Biodiversity and functional ecology of mesophotic coral reefs.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.4949–71. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062423
48
LesserM. P.SlatteryM.StatM.OjimiM.GatesR. D.GrottoliA. (2010). Photoacclimatization by the coral Montastraea cavernosa in the mesophotic zone: light, food, and genetics.Ecology91990–1003. 10.1890/09-0313.1
49
LichtenbergM.LarkumA. W. D.KühlM. (2016). Photosynthetic acclimation of Symbiodinium in hospite depends on vertical position in the tissue of the Scleractinian coral Montastrea curta.Front. Microbiol.7:230. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00230
50
MalikA.EinbinderS.MartinezS.TchernovD.HavivS.AlmulyR.et al (2021). Molecular and skeletal fingerprints of scleractinian coral biomineralization: from the sea surface to mesophotic depths.Acta Biomater.120263–276. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.010
51
ManahanD. T. (1990). Adaptations by invertebrate larvae for nutrient acquisition from seawater.Am. Zool.30147–160. 10.1093/icb/30.1.147
52
MarshallD. J. (2008). Transgenerational plasticity in the sea: context-dependent maternal effects across the life history.Ecology89418–427. 10.1890/07-0449.1
53
MarshallD. J.KeoughM. J. (2003). Variation in the dispersal potential of non-feeding invertebrate larvae: the desperate larva hypothesis and larval size.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.255145–153. 10.3354/meps255145
54
MartinezS.KolodnyY.ShemeshE.ScucchiaF.NevoR.Levin-ZaidmanS.et al (2020). Energy sources of the depth-generalist mixotrophic coral Stylophora pistillata.Front. Mar. Sci.7:988. 10.3389/fmars.2020.566663
55
MassT.EinbinderS.BrokovichE.ShasharN.VagoR.ErezJ.et al (2007). Photoacclimation of Stylophora pistillata to light extremes: metabolism and calcification.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.33493–102. 10.3354/meps334093
56
McCloskeyL. R.MuscatineL.SmithD. C. (1984). Production and respiration in the Red Sea coral Stylophora pistillata as a function of depth.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B. Biol. Sci.222215–230. 10.1098/rspb.1984.0060
57
MorseD. E.HookerN.MorseA. N. C.JensenR. A. (1988). Control of larval metamorphosis and recruitment in sympatric agariciid corals.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.116193–217. 10.1016/0022-0981(88)90027-5
58
MundyC. N.BabcockR. C. (1998). Role of light intensity and spectral quality in coral settlement: implications for depth-dependent settlement?J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.223235–255. 10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00167-6
59
OlitoC.WhiteC. R.MarshallD. J.BarnecheD. R. (2017). Estimating monotonic rates from biological data using local linear regression.J. Exp. Biol.220759–764. 10.1242/jeb.148775
60
PanT. C. F.ApplebaumS. L.LentzB. A.ManahanD. T. (2016). Predicting phenotypic variation in growth and metabolism of marine invertebrate larvae.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.48364–73. 10.1016/j.jembe.2016.06.006
61
PiniakG. A.FogartyN. D.AddisonC. M.KenworthyW. J. (2005). Fluorescence census techniques for coral recruits.Coral Reefs24496–500. 10.1007/s00338-005-0495-1
62
PradaC.HellbergM. E. (2013). Long pre-reproductive selection and divergence by depth in a Caribbean candelabrum coral.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1103961–3966. 10.1073/pnas.1208931110
63
PutnamH. M.GatesR. D. (2015). Preconditioning in the reef-building coral Pocillopora damicornis and the potential for trans-generational acclimatization in coral larvae under future climate change conditions.J. Exp. Biol.2182365–2372. 10.1242/jeb.123018
64
PutnamH. M.Ritson-WilliamsR.CruzJ. A.DavidsonJ. M.GatesR. D. (2020). Environmentally-induced parental or developmental conditioning influences coral offspring ecological performance.Sci. Rep.10:13664. 10.1038/s41598-020-70605-x
65
QuigleyK. M.WillisB. L.BayL. K. (2016). Maternal effects and Symbiodinium community composition drive differential patterns in juvenile survival in the coral Acropora tenuis.R. Soc. Open Sci.3:160471. 10.1098/rsos.160471
66
R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
67
RStudio Team (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R.Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc.
68
RaymundoL. J.MaypaA. P. (2004). Getting bigger faster: mediation of size-specific mortality via fusion in juvenile coral transplants.Ecol. Appl.14281–295. 10.1890/02-5373
69
ReichH. G.RobertsonD. L.Goodbody-GringleyG. (2017). Do the shuffle: changes in Symbiodinium consortia throughout juvenile coral development.PLoS One12:e0171768. 10.1371/journal.pone.0171768
70
ReynoldsJ. M.BrunsB. U.FittW. K.SchmidtG. W. (2008). Enhanced photoprotection pathways in symbiotic dinoflagellates of shallow-water corals and other cnidarians.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10513674–13678. 10.1073/pnas.0805187105
71
Ritson-WilliamsR.ArnoldS. N.FogartyN. D.SteneckR. S.VermeijM. J. A.PaulV. J. (2009). New perspectives on ecological mechanisms affecting coral recruitment on reefs.Smithson. Contrib. Mar. Sci.38:437. 10.5479/si.01960768.38.437
72
RouzéH.GalandP. E.MedinaM.BongaertsP.PichonM.Pérez-RosalesG.et al (2021). Symbiotic associations of the deepest recorded photosynthetic scleractinian coral (172 m depth).ISME J.151564–1568. 10.1038/s41396-020-00857-y
73
ScucchiaF.NativH.NederM.Goodbody-GringleyG.MassT. (2020). Physiological characteristics of Stylophora pistillata larvae across a depth gradient.Front. Mar. Sci.7:13. 10.3389/fmars.2020.00013
74
SerranoX.BaumsI. B.O’ReillyK.SmithT. B.JonesR. J.ShearerT. L.et al (2014). Geographic differences in vertical connectivity in the Caribbean coral Montastraea cavernosa despite high levels of horizontal connectivity at shallow depths.Mol. Ecol.234226–4240. 10.1111/mec.12861
75
SerranoX. M.BaumsI. B.SmithT. B.JonesR. J.ShearerT. L.BakerA. C. (2016). Long distance dispersal and vertical gene flow in the Caribbean brooding coral Porites astreoides.Sci. Rep.6:21619. 10.1038/srep21619
76
SerranoX. M.MillerM. W.HendeeJ. C.JensenB. A.GapayaoJ. Z.PasparakisC.et al (2018). Effects of thermal stress and nitrate enrichment on the larval performance of two Caribbean reef corals.Coral Reefs37173–182. 10.1007/s00338-017-1645-y
77
ShlesingerT.LoyaY. (2021). Depth-dependent parental effects create invisible barriers to coral dispersal.Commun Biol.4:202. 10.1038/s42003-021-01727-9
78
SmithS. R.SarkisS.MurdochT. J. T.WeilE.CroquerA.BatesN. R.et al (2013). “Threats to coral reefs of Bermuda,” in Coral Reefs of the United Kingdom Overseas Territories, Coral Reefs of the World 4, ed.SheppardC. R. C. (Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media), 173–188. 10.1007/978-94-007-5965-7_13
79
SneedJ. M.SharpK. H.RitchieK. B.PaulV. J. (2014). The chemical cue tetrabromopyrrole from a biofilm bacterium induces settlement of multiple Caribbean corals.Proc. Biol. Sci.281:20133086. 10.1098/rspb.2013.3086
80
TordaG.DonelsonJ. M.ArandaM.BarshisD. J.BayL.BerumenM. L.et al (2017). Rapid adaptive responses to climate change in corals.Nat. Clim. Chang.7627–636. 10.1038/nclimate3374
81
TurnerJ. A.ThomsonD. P.CresswellA. K.TraponM.BabcockR. C. (2018). Depth-related patterns in coral recruitment across a shallow to mesophotic gradient.Coral Reefs37711–722. 10.1007/s00338-018-1696-8
82
VennA. A.WilsonM. A.Trapido-RosenthalH. G.KeelyB. J.DouglasA. E. (2006). The impact of coral bleaching on the pigment profile of the symbiotic alga, Symbiodinium.Plant Cell Environ.292133–2142. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.001587.x
83
WarnerM. E.FittW. K.SchmidtG. W. (1999). Damage to photosystem II in symbiotic dinoflagellates: a determinant of coral bleaching.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.968007–8012. 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8007
84
WendtD. E. (2000). Energetics of larval swimming and metamorphosis in four species of Bugula (Bryozoa).Biol. Bull.198346–356. 10.2307/1542690
85
WongK.Goodbody-GringleyG.de PutronS. J.ChequerA. D.PutnamH. (2021). Brooded coral offspring physiology depends on the combined effects of parental press and pulse thermal history.Glob. Chang. Biol.273179–3195. 10.1111/gcb.15629
86
ZhangT.DiazJ. M.BrighiC.ParsonsR. J.McNallyS.ApprillA.et al (2016). Dark production of extracellular superoxide by the coral Porites astreoides and representative symbionts.Front. Mar. Sci.3:232. 10.3389/fmars.2016.00232
Summary
Keywords
mesophotic, plasticity, refugia, respiration, coral larvae, Bermuda
Citation
Goodbody-Gringley G, Scucchia F, Ju R, Chequer A, Einbinder S, Martinez S, Nativ H and Mass T (2021) Plasticity of Porites astreoides Early Life History Stages Suggests Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems Act as Refugia in Bermuda. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:702672. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.702672
Received
29 April 2021
Accepted
05 August 2021
Published
03 September 2021
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Hajime Kayanne, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Reviewed by
Frederic Sinniger, University of the Ryukyus, Japan; Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, University of Guadalajara, Mexico
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Goodbody-Gringley, Scucchia, Ju, Chequer, Einbinder, Martinez, Nativ and Mass.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gretchen Goodbody-Gringley, ggoodbody@reefresearch.orgTali Mass, tmass@univ.haifa.ac.il
This article was submitted to Coral Reef Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.