Abstract
The Hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha, commands a very high value as food fish. The present study was carried out to understand the breeding phenology of T. ilisha in relation to climatic variables. Monthly fish samples were collected from two landing centres, namely, Uzanbazar (Guwahati) and Shri Ramghat, Dhubri, of River Brahmaputra during May 2018 to April 2019. The assessment of gonadosomatic index (GSI) of T. ilisha revealed higher GSI values during October to February, and showed temporal variations with respect to sex. In males, highest GSI value was observed in the month January followed by February, whereas in females, GSI value was found to be highest in November followed by October. GSI (pooled) value was negatively correlated with air temperature, indicating vulnerability of the species to climate change. The highest percentage of mature males was observed during October–February, and mature females during October–December. The length at first maturity was recorded to be 290 mm for female(s) and 259 mm for male(s). The absolute fecundity ranged from 103,164 to 583,456 ova for fishes in the size range of 229–403 mm, with an average of 250,532 ova per female. Relative fecundity was found to range from 306 to 1096 ova per gram body weight, with an average of 791 ova per gram body weight. The diameter of ova of the studied fishes ranged from 414.6 to 738.2 µm, with a mean value of 546.73 ± 7.18 µm. The percentage frequency distribution of mature ova shows a distinct single peak or mode. Sex ratio (male: female) was found to be 1:0.87, indicating dominance of males over females. The chi-square test on observed sex ratio against the hypothetical ratio of 1:1 did not reveal a significant difference (p > 0.05). The findings of the present study can provide impetus toward successful management of this highly prized, transboundary, and migratory resource of River Brahmaputra, in the context of changing climate.
Introduction
Brahmaputra and Barak, with 53 tributaries, are two major river systems of Assam, north-east India. Originating at 5,300 msl, in the glacial mass of Kailash Range in the mighty Himalayas, Brahmaputra flows by the name of Yarlung Tsangpo for a distance of 1,625 km in Tibet and enters India at Gelling near Tuting in Upper Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh. Brahmaputra flows for a distance of 278 km through the state Arunachal Pradesh, with name Siang or Dihang. The river then enters Assam where it unites with Dibang and Lohit, two large Himalayan rivers, and further flows by the name of Brahmaputra through a distance of 640 km from Sadiya to Dhubri. After travelling for a distance of 918 km in India, Brahmaputra flows 337 km in Bangladesh, where it is popular as Jamuna (). The diversity of fish fauna in the river stretch along Assam comprises a blend of torrential, warm-water, and cold-water species (; ; ). reported 217 species, under 36 families, from the state of Assam. reported 126 fish species belonging to 26 families, from Brahmaputra in Assam, which was revised to 141 species belonging to 84 genera and 29 families by . Major carps, minor carps, catfishes, featherbacks, and Hilsa contribute to commercial fishery in the Indian stretch of River Brahmaputra ().
T. ilisha () commonly known as Hilsa migrates from sea to rivers for breeding and has a wide range of distribution in foreshore zones, estuarine zones, brackish water systems, and freshwater lotic ecosystems of the western part of the Indo-Pacific region. In marine waters, the distribution of this species ranges from Persian Gulf to the west and east coasts of India in the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal, respectively. The species has also been reported by researchers from the coastal belt of Sri Lanka and from Laos (). Hilsa fishery both in inland and offshore regions was confined to the artisanal sector, particularly traditional non-mechanized and small mechanized boats (), and is at present mainly exploited by gill nets in inland waters. The species spends a major part of its life in inshore areas and estuaries of rivers and migrates upstream into freshwater bodies, particularly rivers for breeding. Post breeding, the spent fish and their young ones return to the inshore areas (). The highest catch of Hilsa from across the globe is reported from the Ganga–Brahmaputra–Meghna deltaic region of India and Bangladesh and commands an extremely higher value as compared with other fish species reported from the region. Global catch of Hilsa stands at around 0.72 million tonnes year-1, with Bangladesh contributing more than half (50%–60%), followed by Myanmar (20%–25%) and India (15%–20%). The remaining 5%–10% comes from nations like Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Thailand (; ). The species has a great cultural and economic importance in India and Bangladesh. It has a very high consumer preference and is highly prized with an average price of around US$ 12 per kg in the region (). The importance of this species can be derived from the fact that the economic value of Hilsa fishery is worth over US$ 2 billion and generates employment opportunities and acts as a livelihood source for millions of people in India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar (). It is designated as national fish of Bangladesh, and Hilsa of Bangladesh is also given the tag of a geographical indicator.
In India, Hilsa is reported from varied riverine and estuarine ecosystems ranging from the snow-fed Himalayan rivers like Ganga, Bhagirathi, Hooghly, Rupnarayan, and Brahmaputra and their estuaries to rain-fed peninsular rivers like Godavari and their estuaries, all of which drains into Bay of Bengal. The species is also reported from rain-fed peninsular rivers like Narmada and Tapti and their estuaries () draining into the Arabian Sea. The rivers Hooghly, Brahmaputra, and Ganga and their tributaries contribute around 70% of total Hilsa catch in India (; ; ). Although widely distributed along the Indian coast, it forms a commercial fishery in the north-east coast of India comprising the states of West Bengal and Orissa. The species is known for its delicious taste and hence fetches a high price in markets across India (). In addition to its cultural and economic importance, the species also holds an important position in terms of nutritional value () and is popular for its unique taste ().
ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore, has been collecting data on fish catch and catch composition across different landing centres of River Brahmaputra in Assam, especially from Uzanbazar landing centre in Guwahati since 1973. Analysis of data till 2006–2007 indicated that miscellaneous species have started contributing a major chunk of the total fish catch (40%–50%) with dominance of Aspidoparia morar, a minor carp, across all major landing centres of River Brahmaputra in Assam (). At the same time, catch of highly prized species like major carps and Hilsa has declined considerably, with a marked decline (81%) in Hilsa catch (), which formed a major commercial fishery along the lower stretch of the river from Dhubri to Guwahati. documented the highly variable catch trend of prized Hilsa from Uzanbazar (Guwahati) landing centre of River Brahmaputra in Assam. Average landing of the species during the period 1987–1999 was 7,022.1 kg year-1, which increased by 40% during 2000–2009 (9,825.7 kg year-1). The last decade from 2010 to 2019 showed a drastic decline in average catch of the species to 3,424.9 kg year-1, a cause of serious concern and which needs immediate attention. In this context, studies on biology of the species can help researchers and policymakers in formulating measures for sustainable species management.
Detailed research has been carried out on the biology and fishery of this species from Bangladesh waters (; ; ; ). These studies along with other past reports have formed the base for formulating management regulations toward reviving Hilsa fishery in the country. A few selected studies on food and feeding habits (), population characteristics (), catch trend (), and stock structure () of this species have been carried out from Brahmaputra system, India. However, detailed studies on the biology of this species from the Indian part of River Brahmaputra in Assam, which is one of the major migratory route and breeding ground, are lacking. The present study has the potential to act as a knowledge base toward formulating necessary conservatory measures to revive this declining fishery from River Brahmaputra in India and also serve as additional information for policymakers of neighbouring countries to reframe legislations. Hilsa of River Brahmaputra has its origin in Bay of Bengal (), and being a migratory species, any management measure implemented in the Indian part of River Brahmaputra will have its implications in Hilsa fishery of Bangladesh. Hence, the present attempt to document the reproductive biology of the species from Brahmaputra River in India holds significance from a wider policy perspective in the Bay of Bengal region.
Materials and methods
Sampling
During the present study, a total of 275 individuals of T. ilisha (male = 147 no., length: 146–352 mm and weight: 26.75–406 g; and female = 128 no., length: 162–403 mm and weight: 37.93–762 g) were collected from Uzanbazar, Guwahati (26°11′44.33″ N and 91°45′23.94″ E), and Shri Ramghat, Dhubri (26°0′36.50″ N and 89°58′41.61″ E), landing centres of Brahmaputra River (Figure 1). Sampling was carried out at monthly intervals for 1 year from May 2018 to April 2019.
Figure 1
Gonadosomatic index
The total length and weight of the collected specimens were measured by using a measuring scale and an electronic precision balance (0.01 g accuracy), respectively. The total weight of gonad of individual fishes was also measured after dissecting out the gonad, and the gonadosomatic index (GSI) was calculated by applying the following formula, described by
Simple linear regression was carried out to examine the relationship between GSI values of both the sexes separately and in combination, in relation to climate variable, mean monthly air temperature (°C), using SPSS version 16.0 (
Maturity stage
The maturity scale for Hilsa in the present study was adopted from
Fecundity
After dissection, the ovaries were removed out of the body cavity, cleaned, dried in blotting paper, and weighed, and then random subsamples of matured ova from the anterior, mid, and posterior portions of ovaries were taken. Prior to counting the number of eggs present in each subsample, the subsamples were weighed with the help of an electronic precision balance (0.01 g accuracy). A total of 30 ovaries were studied for this purpose. Absolute fecundity was estimated following gravimetric method of
where n = number of matured ova in the subsample, OW = weight of the ovary (g), and w = weight of the sub-sample (g).
In the present study, relative fecundity in relation to body weight (
Linear regression was performed to study the relationships between absolute fecundity and total length (mm), absolute fecundity and body weight (g), and absolute fecundity and gonad weight (g). All sets of data were log transformed prior to analysis. The relationship between absolute fecundity and each of the independent variables was represented using the following equation:
where F is the absolute fecundity, and x is the total length (mm) or body weight (g) or gonad weight (g), depending on the relationship.
Spawning periodicity
For spawning periodicity, ova diameter studies were carried out from preserved ovaries (preserved in 5% formalin). A method of subsampling by taking mature ova from the anterior, posterior, and mid regions of the ovary in a random manner was followed, and the ova were measured (
Results
Gonadosomatic index and sex ratio
Assessment of GSI of T. ilisha samples shows that GSI values were higher during the months from October to February. High GSI values during these months from October to February indicate that the species breed during this part of the year in Brahmaputra River, Assam. From the month of March onward, a decline in GSI values of males and females as well as in pooled data was noticed during the present study and GSI values were found to be on the lower side during the months from March to September. The peak breeding period was found to vary in the case of both males and females. In males, the highest GSI value which can be correlated with the peak breeding period was in January followed by February, whereas in females, the GSI value was found to be highest in November followed by October. In the case of pooled data, GSI value was recorded maximum during November (Figure 2). GSI (male) and GSI (pooled) were significantly negatively correlated with mean air temperature (Table 1). The relationships between GSI (male) versus mean air temperature (F statistic = 14.54; p = 0.003) and between GSI (pooled) and mean air temperature (F statistic = 12.11; p = 0.006) were significant at 1% level of significance. However, the relationship between GSI (female) and mean air temperature (F statistic = 3.49; p = 0.091) was found to be statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Statistical significance of the relationship between climate variable and GSI of T. ilisha can be ascertained by t-statistic and p-value (Table 2). It can be concluded that mean air temperature has a significant effect on GSI of T. ilisha.
Figure 2

Gonadosomatic index (GSI) of T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Table 1
| Parameter | Mean air temperature | p |
|---|---|---|
| Male GSI | -0.770* | 0.003 |
| Female GSI | -0.509 | 0.091 |
| Pooled | -0.740* | 0.006 |
Correlation of GSI with climate parameter—temperature.
*Correlation is significant at 0.01 level.
Table 2
| Relationship | Intercept | Slope | R-square | “t” statistic | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSI (male) × mean air temperature | 4.631943 | -0.14602* | 0.59 | -3.81329 | 0.003411 |
| GSI (pooled) × mean air temperature | 7.134878 | -0.21345* | 0.55 | -3.48027 | 0.005919 |
Relationship between GSI of T. ilisha and climate parameter— temperature.
*Significant at 0.01 level.
Mature individuals
In case of pooled data, highest percentage of mature individuals (stages V and VI) was observed during October–February. A high percentage of mature males was observed during October–February with 100% mature males observed during January–February. The highest percentage of mature females was observed during October–December with 100% mature females during November–December (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Monthly occurrence of mature individuals (male and female) of T. ilisha (expressed in percentage) from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Length at first maturity
Length at first maturity, i.e., the length at which 50% of the total population attains maturity, was found to be 290 mm for female(s) (Figure 4) and 259 mm for male(s) (Figure 5). It indicates that males mature at a smaller size as compared to females. The absolute fecundity was found to range from 103,164 to 583,456 ova for fishes in the size range of 229–403 mm with an average of 250,532 ova per female. Relative fecundity was found to range from 306 to 1096 ova per gram body weight with an average of 791 ova per gram body weight. Analysis showed that a significant linear relationship exists between absolute fecundity and gonad weight (p < 0.01) (Figure 6), between absolute fecundity and fish weight (p < 0.01) (Figure 7), and between absolute fecundity and fish length (p < 0.01) (Figure 8). Based on the value of coefficient of determination (R2), the relationship between absolute fecundity (F) and gonad weight of fish (Gwt) showed a greater degree of fitting (R2 = 0.95), followed by the relationship between absolute fecundity and weight of the fish (W) (R2 = 0.82), followed by the relationship between absolute fecundity and total length of fish (L) (R2 = 0.74). The regression coefficient (slope of the regression equation) was found to be statistically significant as ascertained from the ‘t’ statistic and p value (p < 0.01). Histological sections of mature female gonad (stage VI) is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 4

Length at first maturity in T. ilisha (female) from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Figure 5

Length at first maturity in T. ilisha (male) from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Figure 6

Relationship between absolute fecundity (F) and gonad weight (Gwt) in T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Figure 7

Relationship between absolute fecundity (F) and fish weight (W) in T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Figure 8

Relationship between absolute fecundity (F) and total length of fish (L) in T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Figure 9

Haematoxylin–eosin-stained histological sections of mature female gonad (stage VI) of T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Spawning periodicity
Ova obtained from mature females in stages V and VI of maturity were observed under a stereo zoom microscope (Nikon; Model: SMZ 745T) (2× objective), and the image was captured. The objective of the microscope was adjusted such that it focused along the centre of the ovum. The ova diameter ranged from 414.6 to 738.2 µm. The mean ova diameter was found to be 546.73 ± 7.18 µm.
The percentage frequency distribution of mature ova shows that there is a distinct single peak or mode (Figure 10). This clearly indicates that a single batch of ova undergoes maturation at a time. The occurrence of a single mode as evident from the percentage frequency distribution of ova diameter establishes the fact that T. ilisha spawns once in a year in Brahmaputra River system.
Figure 10

Spawning periodicity in T. ilisha.
The sex ratio (male: female) of T. ilisha collected from River Brahmaputra in Assam was found to be 1:0.87. This showed that males were dominant over females. This observed sex ratio was tested against the hypothetical ratio of 1:1 using chi-square test, and it was found that there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two. However, the chi-square test showed that there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the observed sex ratio from the hypothetical sex ratio of 1:1 during the months of January and March (Table 3). Length group-wise analysis showed that males were dominant in smaller length groups (100–250 mm), whereas in the larger length groups (>250 mm) females were dominant.
Table 3
| Month | Sex ratio | Chi-square | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||
| May, 18 | 1 | 0.66666 | 0.20 | 0.655 |
| June, 18 | 1 | 0.75 | 0.143 | 0.705 |
| July, 18 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.50 | 0.480 |
| August, 18 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.000 | 0.317 |
| September, 18 | 1 | 1.55555 | 1.087 | 0.297 |
| October, 18 | 1 | 0.88888 | 0.176 | 0.674 |
| November, 18 | 1 | 1.52381 | 2.283 | 0.131 |
| December, 18 | 1 | 1.47058 | 1.524 | 0.217 |
| January, 19 | 1 | 0.42105 | 4.481 | 0.034* |
| February, 19 | 1 | 0.42857 | 3.2 | 0.074 |
| March, 19 | 1 | 0.35294 | 5.261 | 0.022* |
| April, 19 | 1 | 0.4 | 1.286 | 0.257 |
| Overall | 1 | 0.87074 | 1.313 | 0.252 |
Sex ratio in T. ilisha from River Brahmaputra, Assam.
Values in bold and marked * are significant at 0.05 level.
Discussion
The gonadosomatic index (GSI) is an indicator of reproductive status of fish (
Length at first maturity, i.e., the length at which 50% of the total population attains maturity, was found to be 290 mm for female(s) and 259 mm for male(s). It was found that males mature at a smaller size as compared with females. A series of studies have been made on the length at first maturity in Hilsa from different water bodies across India, viz., 350 mm for males and 356 mm for females from Godavari river (
Table 4
| Parameter | Value reported from Bangladesh waters | Reference | Value observed in the present study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex ratio (male: female) | 2:1 | 1:0.87 | |
| Fecundity (nos.) | 90,000–2,000,000 | 103,164–583,456 | |
| 348,318–1,465,969 | |||
| 380,000–1,820,000 | |||
| 600,000–1,500,000 400,000–670,000 | |||
| 660,000–1,547,000 399,000–670,000 | |||
| 226,000–1,390,000 | |||
| 226,000–1,931,000 | |||
| 108,500–1,993,846 | |||
| 1,864,000 | |||
| 144,000–230,000 | |||
| 1,030,951–1,940,620 | |||
| 112,554–950,625 | |||
| 558,700–1,867,000 | |||
| Ova diameter (unfertilized) (mm) | 0.7 | 0.414 to 0.738 | |
| 0.735 | |||
| 0.68–0.87 | |||
| Length at first maturity (mm) | 210 (male); 320 (female) | 259 (male); 290 (female) | |
| 400 (male); 400 (female) | |||
| Spawning season | Monsoon (major peak); all other months (minor peak) | October–February | |
| October–November (major peak); all other months (minor peak) | |||
| July–October (major peak); January March (minor peak) | |||
| Monsoon and winter (major peak); all other months (minor peak) | |||
| January–March, July–October (major peak) |
Comparative analysis of selected biological parameters of T. ilisha from Brahmaputra River, India, and Bangladesh waters.
Reports of various workers revealed that Hilsa spawns only once in a year in Brahmaputra (
Hilsa has a dominant presence in the entire Bay of Bengal region and its adjoining freshwater zones. Being a transboundary and highly migratory resource, specific management measures need to be catered. Sociocultural significance in the Indian subcontinent makes this anadromous fish highly sought after. The present study on the reproductive biology of this species from Brahmaputra River has its significance in north-east India and more importantly in Bangladesh, downstream. Policy measures like fish sanctuaries and minimum legal size (MLS) for capture based on length at first maturity are few examples of management implications that can revive Hilsa fishery in Brahmaputra. Size at which females become sexually mature (29 cm as observed in the present study) can be set as MLS for Hilsa in Assam. It is to be noted that MLS for catching Hilsa in Bangladesh is 25 cm (
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute.
Author contributions
SB: conceptualization, major contribution in writing, data collection, and analysis. AS, VG, DM and DM: manuscript writing and correction. AY, PG and KR: data analysis and interpretation of data. AJ, GD and BB: revision of the draft for final submission. BD: overall guidance and manuscript correction. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The authors are thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, for financial support to carry out the research work under the NEH Component of ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Director, ICAR-CIFE, Mumbai, for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work. The first author is thankful to the Director, ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore, Kolkata, for providing necessary laboratory facilities and valuable guidance for completing the research work. The authors are also thankful to the fisher community of River Brahmaputra, Assam, India.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial and financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhmedN. (1954). Hilsa fishery of East Bengal. J. Asiat. Soc (Sci.)20, 7–14.
2
AkterA. M.HossainM. D.HossianK. M.AfzaR.BhuyianA. S. (2007). The fecundity of Hilsa ilisha from the river Padma near Godagari of Rajshahi district. Univ. J. Zool. Rajshahi Univ.20, 97–103. doi: 10.3329/ujzru.v26i0.696
3
AminS. M. N.ArshadA.HalderG. C.ShohaimiS.AraR. (2005). Estimation of size frequency distribution, sex ratio and length weight relationship of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) in Bangladesh waters. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci.1, 61–66.
4
Anon (2020). Gazette notification, Department of Fisheries, Government of Bangladesh (Dhaka, Bangladesh: Government of Bangladesh).
5
ArrudaL. M.AzevedoI. N.NetoA. I. (1993). Abundance, age structure and growth and reproduction of gobies in the Riade Averio lagoon (Portugal). Estuar. Coast. Shelf S.37, 509–523. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1993.1070
6
BFRI (2007). Hilsa fishery management research: annual progress report 2007 (Bangladesh: Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute), 10.
7
BhattacharjyaB. K.BhaumikU.SharmaA. P. (2017). Fish habitat and fisheries of Brahmaputra river in Assam, India. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage.20 (1-2), 102–115. doi: 10.1080/14634988.2017.1297171
8
BhattacharjyaB. K.ChoudhuryM.SugunanV. V. (2003). “Icthyofaunistic resources of Assam with a note on their sustainable utilization,” in The participatory approach for fish biodiversity conservation in northeast India (Lucknow, India: NBFGR), 87–105.
9
BhaumikU.SharmaA. P. (2012). Present status of Hilsa in Hooghly-Bhagirathi river (India: ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore, Bulletin no. 179).
10
BiswasS. P. (1992). Manual of methods in fish biology (India: South Asian Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi), 131.
11
BlaberS. J. M.MiltonD. A.BrewerD. T.SaliniJ. P. (2001). “The shads (genus Tenualosa) of tropical Asia: an overview of their biology, status and fisheries,” in The proceedings of the international terubok conference. Eds. BladerS.BewerD.MiltonD.BaianoC. (Malaysia: Sarawark Development Institute (SDI), Kuching, Sarawark), 9–17.
12
BOBLME (2012). Report of the Hilsa fisheries assessment working group II (Thailand: BOBLME, Phuket), 29.
13
BorahS.JaiswarA. K.BhattacharjyaB. K.DeshmukheG.SahooA. K.GogoiP.et al. (2022a). Food spectrum dynamics of anadromous hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton 1822) inhabiting river Brahmaputra, India curtailing apprehension of food selectivity: an insight into its domestication. Indian J. Mar. Sci.51 (01), 67–77. doi: 10.56042/ijms.v51i01.41641
14
BorahS.LandgeA. T.BhattacharjyaB. K.ChakrabortyS. K.RamtekeK. K.BarmanJ.et al. (2014). Variation in morphometric and meristic traits of Aspidoparia morar from Brahmaputra and Barak rivers of Assam, India. J. Appl. Nat. Sci.6 (1), 262–266. doi: 10.31018/jans.v6i1.412
15
BorahS.VaisakhG.JaiswarA. K.BhattacharjyaB. K.SahooA. K.DeshmukheG.et al. (2022b). On the population characteristics of anadromous Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton 1822) occurring from river Brahmaputra, India. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manage.25 (2), 44–52. doi: 10.14321/aehm.025.02.44
16
BorahS.VaisakhG.JaiswarA. K.BhattacharjyaB. K.SahooA. K.DeshmukheG.et al. (2019b). Association pattern between dimensions of fish and otolith to expedite morphometric variations of three geographically isolated stocks of Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton 1822) from diverse ecosystems. Indian J. Fish.66 (3), 48–52. doi: 10.21077/ijf.2019.66.3.91245-06
17
BorahS.VaisakhG.JaiswarA. K.BhattacharjyaB. K.SahooA. K.DeshmukheG.et al. (2019a). Length-weight relationship and condition factor of three geographically isolated populations of Hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton 1822). J. Inland Fish. Soc India51 (1), 49–54.
18
BradshawC. J. A.McMahonC. R. (2008). “Fecundity,” in The encyclopaedia of ecology. Eds. JorgensenS. E.FathB. D. (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc), 1535–1543.
19
CarnevaliO.CandelmaM.SagratiA.PignalosaP.GiorginiE.GioacchiniG. (2019). Macromolecular characterization of swordfish oocytes by FTIR imaging spectroscopy. Sci. Rep.9, 8850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45065-7
20
ChackoP. I.GanapatiS. V. (1949). On the bionomics of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) in the Godavari river. Madras Univ. J.18, 16–22.
21
ChackoP. I.KrishnamurthyB. (1950). A biometrical study of Hilsa ilisha (Ham.) in the Godavari river. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc49, 315–316.
22
DasB. C.SwatiS. N.KhatunT.MoniruzzamanM.RashidH. (2022). Study of the spawning season of hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha in Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Fisheries34, 87–94. doi: 10.52168/bjf.2022.34.9
23
DeD. K. (1980). Maturity, fecundity and spawning of post-monsoon run of hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) in the upper stretches of the Hooghly estuarine system. J. Inland Fish. Soc India12, 54–63.
24
DeD. K. (1986). Studies on the food and feeding habit of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) of the Hooghly estuarine system and some aspects of its biology. PhD Thesis (Calcutta, India: Calcutta University), 285.
25
DeD. K. (2014). The shad hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton): its fishery and biology (India: Narendra Publishing House, Delhi), 227.
26
DohaS.HyeM. A. (1971). Fecundity of Padma river hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton). Pak. J. Sci.22, 176–184.
27
DunnI. C. (1982). The Hilsa fishery of Bangladesh 1982: an investigation of the present status with an evaluation of the current data (Rome: FAO, Field document 2), 71.
28
DuttaS.Al-AbriI.PaulS. (2021). Bio-economic trends of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) fishery: perspectives of transboundary management between India and Bangladesh. Mar. Policy128, 104483. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104483
29
El-SayedA. F. M. (2020). Tilapia culture Second edition (London, UK: Academic Press), 358.
30
ESRI (2008). ArcGIS desktop: release 9.3 (Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute).
31
GanapatiS. V.AlikunhiK. H.ThivyF. (1951). On an interesting case of carp spawning in the river Cauvery at Bhavani during June 1947. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc50, 140–146.
32
GhaffariH.ArdalanA. A.SahafiH. H.BabaeiM. M. (2011). Annual changes in gonadosomatic index (GSI), hepatosomatic index (HSI) and condition factor (K) of largescale tonguesole Cynoglossus arel (Bloch & Schneider 1801) in the coastal waters of Bandar abbas, Persian gulf. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.5, 1640–1646.
33
GrossenC.NeuenschwanderS.PerrinN. (2011). Temperature-dependent turnovers in sex-determination mechanisms: a quantitative model. Evolution65, 64–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01098.x
34
HamiltonF. (1822). An account of the fishes found in the river Ganga and its branches (UK: Archibald Constable and Company, Edinburgh, London).
35
HoneycuttJ. L.DeckC. A.MillerS. C.SeveranceM. E.AtkinsE. B.LuckenbachJ. A.et al. (2019). Warmer waters masculinize wild populations of a fish with temperature-dependent sex determination. Sci. Rep.9, 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42944-x
36
HaldarG. C. (2004). Present status of the hilsa fishery in Bangladesh. Report of studies conducted under ARDMCS GEF component FFP Rep. No. 38.8 (Dhaka, Bangladesh: Department of Fisheries), 70.
37
HopkinsC. L. (1979). Reproduction in Galaxias fasciatus Gray (Salmoniformes: Galaxiidae). New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh.13, 225–230. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1979.9515797
38
HossainM. A.DasI.GenevierL.HazraS.RahmanM.BarangeM.et al. (2019). Biology and fisheries of Hilsa shad in Bay of Bengal. Sci. Total Environ.651, 1720–1734. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.034
39
IossaG. (2019). Sex-specific differences in thermal fertility limits. Trends Ecol. Evol.34, 490–492. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.016
40
IslamM. A.BegumM.PalH. K.AlamM. J. (2008). Studies on the gonadosomatic index and fecundity of Mystus gulio (Ham.). Progress. Agric.19, 161–166. doi: 10.3329/pa.v19i2.16957
41
IslamM. S.HuqQ. M.HossianM. M.AzadS. A.DasN. N. (1987). “Maturity and spawning of Hilsa shad, Hilsa ilisha of Bangladesh,” in Hilsa investigation in Bangladesh. Marine Fishery resources management (Colombo: Bay of Bengal Programme), 82–95.
42
JanM.JanN. (2017). Studies on the fecundity (F), gonadosomatic index (GSI) and hepatosomatic index (HSI) of Salmo trutta fario (Brown trout) at Kokernag trout fish farm, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud.5, 170–173.
43
JonesS.MenonP. M. G. (1951). Observations on the life-history of the Indian shad, HiIsa ilisha (Hamilton). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.31, 101–125. doi: 10.1007/BF03049975
44
KarmakarS.PatraK.JanaS.MandalD. P.BhattacharjeeS. (2016). Exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of malathion induces significant cellular, biochemical and histological alterations in Labeo rohita. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.126, 49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.07.006
45
KaramchandaniS. J. (1961). On the location of spawning grounds of Indian shad, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) in freshwater regions of the Narmada river. Curr. Sci.30, 373–375.
46
KingdomT.AllisonM. E. (2011). The fecundity, gonadosomatic and hepatosomatic indices of Pellonula leonensis in the lower Nun river, Niger delta, Nigeria. Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci.3, 175–179.
47
LeachG. C. (1925). Artificial propagation of shad (Washington D. C.: Department of US commercial fisheries), 459–486.
48
MathurP. K. (1964). Studies on the maturity and fecundity of the hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) in the upper stretches of the Ganga. Indian J. Fish.11, 423–448.
49
MiahM. S. (2015). Climatic and anthropogenic factors changing spawning pattern and production zone of Hilsa fishery in the Bay of Bengal. Weather and Climate Extremes7, 109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.01.001
50
MiltonD. A. (2010). Status of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) management in the Bay of Bengal: an assessment of population risk and data gaps for more effective regional management (Phuket, Thailand: BOBLME).
51
MohantyB. P.PariaP.MahantyA.BeheraB. K.MathewS.ShankarT. V.et al. (2012). Fatty acid profile of Indian shad Tenualosa ilisha. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.35, 263–269. doi: 10.1007/s40009-012-0042-x
52
MotwaniM. P.JayramK. C.SehgalK. L. (1962). Fish and fisheries of the Brahmaputra river system, Assam. Fish fauna with observations on their zoo-geographical distribution. Trop. Ecol.3, 17–43.
53
MoulaG. (1992). Studies on some biological aspects of hilsa (Chandpur: National Workshop on Hilsa Fishery Development and Management, Fisheries Research Institute), 12.
54
MutlakM. F. (2012). Stock assessment of some fish species from East Al-hammar marsh, Southern Iraq (Iraq: University of Basrah), 195. PhD Thesis.
55
NathA. K.BanerjeeB. (2012). Comparative evaluation of body composition of hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha in different size groups with special reference to fatty acids, in Hooghly estuarine system, West Bengal. Indian J. Fish.59, 141–146.
56
PhukanG. C. (2006). The Assam fishery rule2nd edition (Guwahati, India: Assam Law House), 157.
57
PillayT. V. R. (1958). Biology of the hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Ham.) of the river Hooghly. Indian J. Fish.5, 201–257.
58
PillayS. R.RaoK. V. (1963). “Observations on the biology and fishery of the hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) of river Godavari,” in Proceedings of the 10th Indo-Pacific fisheries council meeting (Thailand, Bangkok: Indo-Pacific Fisheries Council), 37–61.
59
PillayS. R.RosaH.Jr. (1963). Synopsis of biological data on hilsa, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) Vol. 38 (Rome: FAO Fisheries Biology Synopsis, FAO).
60
PrabhuM. S. (1956). Maturation of intra-ovarian eggs and spawning periodicities in some fishes. Indian J. Fish.3, 59–90.
61
PramanikM. M. H.RahmanM. A.AhmedT.FluraH. M.HasanM. M.KhanM. M.et al. (2017). Gill net selectivity of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) in the Meghna river estuary of Bangladesh. J. Aquac. Res. Dev.8, 1000483. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000483
62
QuddusM. M. A. (1982). Two types of Hilsa ilisha and their population biology from Bangladesh waters (Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo), 180.
63
QuddusM. M. A. (1983). Hilsa shad of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Portrait26, 42–44.
64
QuddusM. M. A.ShimizuM.NoseY. (1984). Meristic and morphometric differences in two types of Hilsa ilisha in Bangladesh waters. Bull. Japan Soc Sci. Fish.50, 43–49. doi: 10.2331/suisan.50.43
65
QuereshiM. R. (1968). Hilsa fishery in East Pakistan. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res.11, 95–103.
66
RahmanM. J.MustafaM. G.RahmanM. A. (1998). “Population dynamics and recruitment pattern of hilsa, Tenualosa ilisha,” in Proceedings of the BFRI/ACIAR/CSIRO workshop on Hilsa fisheries research in Bangladesh (Mymensingh, Bangladesh:BFRI), 28–36.
67
RahmanM. J.WahabM. A.NahiduzzamanM.HaqueA. B. M. M.CohenP. (2020). Hilsa fishery management in Bangladesh. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci.414, 012018.
68
RajaB. T. A. (1985). A review of the biology and fisheries of Hilsa ilisha in the upper Bay of Bengal. (FAO, Rome: Bay of Bengal Programme), 53.
69
RajeshK. M.RohitP.VaseV. K.SampathkumarG.SahibK. (2015). Fishery, reproductive biology and stock status of the large head hairtail Trichiurus lepturus Linnaeus 1758 off Karnataka, South-west coast of India. Indian J. Fish.62, 28–34.
70
RajyalakshmiT. (1973). The population characteristics of the Godavari Hilsa over the years 1963-1967. Indian J. Fish.20, 78–94.
71
RamakrishnaiahM. (1972). Biology of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) from the Chilka lake with an account on its racial status. Indian J. Fish.19, 35–53.
72
RaoK. V.PathakS. C. (1972). A note on the occurrence of spawning of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton) in the river Brahmaputra (Assam). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sec. B.42, 231–233.
73
ReubenS.DanS. S.SomarajuM. V.PhiliposeV.SathianandanT. V. (1992). The resources of Hilsa shad, Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton), along the northeast coast of India. Indian J. Fish.39, 169–181.
74
RogersL. A.DoughertyA. B. (2019). Effects of climate and demography on reproductive phenology of a harvested marine fish population. Global Change Biol.25, 708–720. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14483
75
SadovyY. J. (1996). “Reproduction of reef fishery species,” in Reef fisheries. Eds. PoluninN. V. C.RobertsC. M. (Dordrecht, NL: Springer), 15–59.
76
SahooA. K.WahabM.PhillipsM.RahmanA.PadiyarA.PuvanendranV.et al. (2016). Breeding and culture status of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha, Ham. 1822) in South Asia: a review. Rev. Aquacult.10, 96–110. doi: 10.1111/raq.12149
77
SaifullahA. S. M.RahmanM. S.KhanS. A. Y. (2004). Fecundity of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton 1822) from the Bay of Bengal. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci.7, 1394–1398. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2004.1394.1398
78
SattarS. A.AdamM. S. (2005). Review of grouper fishery of the Maldives with additional notes on the faafu atoll fishery Vol. 54 (Male (Maldives: Marine Fishery Research Centre).
79
SaudB. J.LandgeA. T.BorahS. (2015). Gonado-somatic index and fecundity of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) from the lower reaches of Brahmaputra river, Assam, India. J. Exp. Zool. India18, 657–660.
80
SenN. (2000). “Occurrence, distribution and status of diversified fish fauna of northeast India,” in Fish biodiversity of northeast India. Eds. PonniahA. G.SarkarU. K. (Lucknow, India: NBFGR), 31–48.
81
ShafiM.QuddusM. M. A. (2001). Bangladesher matsho shampad (Bangladesh: Kabir Publication).
82
ShafiM.QuddusM. M. A.HossainM. (1978a). Studies on length-girth relationship, sex ratio, size composition, gears and abundance of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton-Buchanan) in the river Padma. Dacca Univ. Stud. B.26, 123–127.
83
ShafiM.QuddusM. M. A.IslamN. (1978b). Maturation and spawning of Hilsa ilisha (Hamilton-Buchanan) of the river Meghna. Dacca Univ. Stud. B.26, 63–71.
84
SharmaA. P.NaskarM.JoshiK. D.BhattacharjyaB. K.SahuS. K.DasS.et al. (2014). Impact of climate variation on breeding of major fish species in inland waters (India: Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Kolkata, Bulletin No. 185).
85
SinhaM. (1994). Fish genetic resources of the north-eastern region of India. J. Inland Fish. Soc India26, 1–19.
86
SPSS Inc. (2008). Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 (Chicago III: SPSS Inc.).
87
TalbotG. B. (1953). The passage of shad at the Bonneville fishways. Special scientific report: fisheries no. 94 (Washington D.C.: US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service), 1–30.
88
TootsH. (1951). Number of eggs in different populations of whitefish (Coregonus). Rep. lnst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm32, 133–138.
89
Trindade-SantosI.FreireK. D. M. F. (2015). Analysis of reproductive patterns of fishes from three large marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci.2, 38. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2015.00038
90
VaasK. K.MozaU. (2011). “Riverine fisheries,” in Handbook of fisheries and aquaculture (New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Agricultural Research), 169–207.
91
VaisakhG.BorahS.DeshmukheG.JaiswarA. K.SahooA. K.SrihariM.et al. (2020). On the morphological variations of geographically isolated migratory and non-migratory populations of tropical shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton 1822) from three distinct tropical ecosystems. Indian J. Mar. Sci.49 (07), 1189–1196.
92
VishwanathW. (2002). Fishes of northeast India: a field guide to species identification (India: Manipur University, Imphal).
93
VladykovV. (1956). Fecundity of wild speckled trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in Quebec lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can.13, 799–841. doi: 10.1139/f56-046
94
WalshM.HopkinsP.WitthamesP.Greer WalkerM.WatsonJ. (1990). Estimation of total potential fecundity and atresia in the western mackerel stock 1989 (Copenhagen, Denmark: ICES).
95
YadavA. K.BorahS.BhattacharjyaB. K.DasK. K.DasB. K. (2022b). Decadal shift in fish landings and catch composition in Brahmaputra river, Assam, India. Res. Bio.4, 132–138. doi: 10.54083/ResBio/4.3.2022/132-138
96
YadavA. K.BorahS.DasK. K.RamanR. K.DasP.DasB. K. (2022a). Modeling of Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) landings in the lower stretch of river Brahmaputra, Assam, India under time-series framework. ScienceAsia48, 367–372. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2022.042
97
ZhuS.NyarkoE. K.Hadzima-NyarkoM. (2018). Modelling daily water temperature from air temperature for the Missouri River. PeerJ6, e4894. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4894
Summary
Keywords
Indian shad, reproductive biology, climate parameters, Brahmaputra, sustainable management
Citation
Borah S, Sahoo AK, Gopinathapillai V, Meena DK, Jaiswar AK, Deshmukhe G, Yadav AK, Gogoi P, Mohanty D, Ramteke K, Bhattacharjya BK and Das BK (2023) Understanding the breeding phenology of anadromous fish Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton, 1822) in relation to climatic variables in Brahmaputra River, India. Front. Mar. Sci. 10:1063210. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1063210
Received
06 October 2022
Accepted
02 May 2023
Published
29 May 2023
Volume
10 - 2023
Edited by
Michael Phillips, WorldFish, Malaysia
Reviewed by
Md. Nahiduzzaman, WorldFish, Malaysia; Anil Sharma, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Borah, Sahoo, Gopinathapillai, Meena, Jaiswar, Deshmukhe, Yadav, Gogoi, Mohanty, Ramteke, Bhattacharjya and Das.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Basanta Kumar Das, basantakumard@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.