ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci., 19 April 2023

Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology

Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1106721

A relay of anticyclonic eddies transferring North Pacific subtropical mode water into the South China Sea

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China

  • 2. Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China

  • 3. Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China

  • 4. College of Earth Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Abstract

North Pacific subtropical mode waters (STMWs), which are subducted with air-sea interaction signals and characterized by low potential vorticity (PV), play an important role in climate change issues. STMW () can be advected westward by large-scale ocean circulation and mesoscale eddies. However, whether and how the STMW intrudes into the South China Sea (SCS) remains unclear. Low PV signals that originate from the STMW and intruding into the SCS are investigated by comparing observations and ocean general circulation models during 2003-2017. These signals mostly move across the Luzon Strait (LS) into the SCS during the 2008-2009 and 2014-2016 periods. The results of case studies selected from these two periods indicate that the low PV signals can move to the LS and are trapped by anticyclonic eddies (AEs). When the velocity vorticity is negative southwest of Taiwan Island, vertical stratification becomes weaker west of the coming AE (AE1), and low PV signals can consequently be transported along the STMW layer (25.0 - 25.5 isopycnal layer). Thus, an AE (AE2) forms east of AE1 and isolates the low PV signal from AE1, and then AE2 transports the low PV water southwestward in the SCS. In contrast, the low PV signal has difficulty migrating eastward when the velocity vorticity is positive west of AE1, as vertical stratification strengthens and then weakens that signal. The results suggest that only AEs can relay low PV signals from east of the LS and carry them over long distances in the SCS.

1 Introduction

The Luzon Strait (LS), located between Taiwan and the Luzon Islands, is the only deep channel connecting the North Pacific (NP) and the South China Sea (SCS). Previous studies have revealed that NP signals can impinge on the SCS and thus affect the dynamic state of the SCS through LS transport (, ; ; ). The Kuroshio, carrying NP water, intrudes into the SCS when it passes by the LS (; ; ). The NP water can be advected to the SCS with a multilayer vertical structure across the LS, with the Kuroshio flowing into the SCS in the upper layer above 500 m and in the deep layer below 2000 m and outflow in the middle layer (; ). Both observations and numeric model results (; ; ) demonstrate that the Kuroshio takes different intruding paths southwest of Taiwan, and the changes in the Kuroshio intrusion paths often induce eddies in the LS area (). In addition, LS transport can also convey climate change signals from the NP to the SCS and thus modulate the momentum, heat and salt budgets there (; ; ; ; ).

The North Pacific subtropical mode water (STMW) is characterized as low potential vorticity (PV) water in the subsurface layer and is commonly detected in the subtropical gyre (). The subduction of STMW takes place in the isopycnal outcrop region in late winter, generally when the mixed layer is the deepest during the year (). The STMW propagates along isopycnal surfaces with sea–air interaction signals to the tropical region and is thus believed to play an important role in climate change (; ; ).

STMW presents remarkable mesoscale features in which thick mode water is related to anticyclonic eddy (AE) occurrence due to its deep mixed layer accompanied by a deep thermocline, and vice versa (). Observations have revealed that eddies are able to retain mode water and propagate westward over long distances (; ; ). Using the outputs from eddy-resolving global ocean simulations, confirmed that the southward translation of AEs can be accompanied by low PV signals. Previous observations show that eddy activities are frequent in the LS area (; ; ; ; ). With both observed and numeric model outputs, found a subsurface AE between 500 m and 900 m at approximately 120° - 121°E, 19.5° - 20.5°N, which possibly developed due to the baroclinic instability of the Luzon Undercurrent and interaction of the current with the bottom topography. Using in situ measurements from October 2014, detected low PV water trapped by a subsurface-intensified AE east of Taiwan Island (23°N, 120°-130°E) and found that the meridional velocity anomaly observed in the subsurface corresponded to the low PV core in the subsurface layer. indicated that a subsurface speed maximum originating from the Kuroshio could modulate the baroclinic instability in the LS and thus result in mesoscale eddy variability there. Our previous study demonstrated that a low PV signal could impinge on the Kuroshio mainstream at 20° - 23°N accompanied by an AE, with a subsurface speed maximum and southwestward movement (). demonstrated that the low PV signal of STMW can reach the LS and thus result in subsurface transport variation in the LS. These results indicate that the low PV signal occurring in the LS area might be trapped by AEs and can be traced to the STMW subduction region.

While previous studies have provided important information about water mass exchange across the LS and eddy activities in the LS area, research is still lacking on eddy-trapped low PV water exchange between the NP and SCS. Both the results of and indicated subsurface variation in the LS area, and the subsurface variation was correlated with stratification structure change, which would induce PV changes locally. Consequently, we wish to address the following questions: can low PV signals move across the LS? If so, how can these low PV signals reach the LS? What is the physical process by which the low PV signals intrude into the SCS through the LS? We show that the low PV signals are trapped by AEs moving to the LS and relayed by a newly formed AE intruding into the SCS. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. The data and methods used in this paper are described in Section 2. Section 3 reveals that the low PV signals are trapped by AEs moving across the LS and then relayed by AEs west of the LS moving southwestward. Finally, we provide a summary and discussion in Section 4.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Observational data

The accumulation of Argo profiles since the early 2000s provides a large number of undersurface temperature and salinity records from a typical depth of ~5 m to approximately 2000 m. Argo profiles were obtained from the China Argo Real‐Time Data Center. The World Ocean Atlas 2013 (WOA13) provides a set of 0.25° × 0.25° climatological fields of annually-composited, in situ temperature and salinity data at standard depth levels in the world ocean (http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/). Daily sea surface height data during 2003-2017, with a horizontal resolution corresponding to a 1/4° latitude by 1/4° longitude grid, are obtained from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS; http://marine.copernicus.eu/). Figure 1A presents the climatology distribution of the observed sea surface height (SSH) and the standard deviation of SSH in our study region.

Figure 1

2.2 The OFES

The ocean general circulation model (OGCM) for the Earth Simulator (OFES) is based on Modular Ocean Model V.3 and has been substantially optimized for massively parallel computations on the Earth Simulator. The domain of the model extends from 75°S to 75°N, with a high horizontal resolution of 0.1°. In the vertical direction, there are 54 levels spanning from 5 to 6,065 m. The OFES, which is a non-assimilation model, was spun up using National Centers for Environmental Prediction and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) monthly mean atmospheric reanalysis fluxes and was then driven by daily mean NCEP/NCAR wind stresses and surface heat fluxes for the period from 1950 to 2010. Scale‐selective damping by a biharmonic operator was utilized for the horizontal mixing of momentum and tracers to suppress computational noise. The viscosity and diffusivity coefficients, varying proportionally to the cube of the zonal grid spacing, were -2.7 × 1010 m4· for momentum and -9 × 109 m4 · s-1 for tracers at the equator. They varied proportionally with the cube of the zonal grid spacing. The vertical viscosity and diffusivity were calculated using the K‐profile parameterization, which adopted a double diffusion parameterization (). More details of the model and the simulation can be found in . The 3‐day model outputs from 2003 to 2017 were downloaded from the Asia Pacific Data Research Center (APDRC) for this study.

2.3 Model validation

Many previous studies demonstrated that the OFES reproduced most of the observed phenomena in the NP and certified the capability of the OFES to simulate eddy activities in the NP (; ; ; ; ; ). Figures 1A, B depicts the standard deviation of the SSH and the climatological SSH from the observations and OFES. The variability of the eddies was assessed by the standard deviation of the SSH, and the geostrophic relation directly related the sea surface geostrophic current to the horizonal gradient of the SSH. Compared to the observations, the western boundary current and the standard deviation of the SSH around the LS were effectively reproduced in the OFES. Although the eddy activity in the OFES was stronger than that observed in the SCS in this study, the OFES pattern was comparable to that in the observation southwest of Taiwan Island, where eddy activity was strong. Figures 1C, D depict the mean sea surface current calculated with the observations and OFES datasets. The meander structure in the LS area was obvious in the observed result with the low-resolution dataset, while the meander was well simulated with the high-resolution OFES outputs. We also compared the zonal geostrophic velocity distributions from the OFES with the WOA13 along sections to the west (118°–121°E) and east (122°–124°E) of the LS (not shown). Although the simulated velocity was somewhat higher than the observed velocity, patterns of the zonal geostrophic velocity on both sides of the LS were well simulated by the OFES.

Since the simulated velocity was slightly higher than the observed velocity, we also compared the Luzon Strait transport (LST) at the surface from the OFES with the CMEMS data. The zonal geostrophic velocity was calculated from SSH as , where is the SSH. The LST in the surface layer was calculated from , where ln (ls) denotes the northernmost (southernmost) latitude of the LS and is defined as 10 m. Figure 1E shows the 13-month, low-pass-filtered LST anomalies from the CMEMS and OFES data, with negative anomalies representing the LST increase. The simulated LST significantly correlated with the observed LST; the correlation coefficient reached 0.62 with a confidence level of 95%. Negative LST anomalies were obvious during the 97/98, 09/10 and 15/16 El Niño events. Generally, the simulated variation trends were consistent with observed trends, with decreasing trends during the periods of 1999-2004 and 2013-2017 and increasing trends during 2005-2013. In addition, the standard deviation of the LST of the OFES () was comparable to that of the observed ().

Since this study focused on the transport of low PV signals in the subsurface layer, the climatological mean PV distribution in the STMW core layer was used to assess the OFES results (Figures 2A, B). Our previous study demonstrated that mode water mostly appeared in the isopycnal layer in both the observations and the OFES results (). Consequently, our study focused on the movement of low PV signals in this isopycnal layer (hereafter, the core layer) in the remainder of this paper.

Figure 2

The PV is defined as follows:

where z has negative values below the sea surface, f is the Coriolis parameter, and is the water density (1024 kg m-3). The PV consists of terms for the planetary vorticity () and relative vorticity. According to eq. (1), weak (strong) vertical stratification favors a strong (weak) low PV signal. In this study, we take only the planetary vorticity into consideration to avoid the effect of background currents. Due to the deep convection that results from strong winter cooling, the mixed layer is deepest in the winter, and thus, there is a thicker low PV layer in late winter (March).

Figure 2A shows the climatology of the PV distribution from the WOA13 on the STMW core layer. The lowest PV appeared west of 160°E and south of the Kuroshio Extension in Figure 2A. The zonal gradient of PV between the SCS and NP is obvious due to the steep westward shoaling of the thermocline in the LS (). The PV distribution is well reproduced by the OFES in Figure 2B. It is also important to focus our attention on whether the OFES could simulate the PV distribution across the LS. Figures 2C, D exhibit the potential density and PV distribution along the 120.5°E section, as calculated with the WOA13 and OFES data, respectively. Although the simulated depth of the 26.0 isopycnal is slightly deeper, the depth of the isopycnal in the OFES is generally similar to the observed result. The PV from both the observations and OFES are lower under the 25.0 isopycnal, above (below) which stratification is relatively strong (weak). Although there were some discrepancies between the vertical distributions of the observed and OFES PV results, the meridional mean PV derived from the WOA13 and OFES are similar, especially in the subsurface layer where low PV water exists.

The observed result indicated that the mode water can move to the LS, and this process is well simulated with the OFES outputs. Figures 3A, B present the low PV signal distribution in the core layer between 19°-23°N from 2003 to 2017 based on the Argo profiles and OFES outputs, respectively. There are a total of 3279 Argo profiles (black dots), 803 of which captured low PV water (red dots) in 115°-125°E, 19°-23°N, as shown in Figure 3A, from 2003 to 2017. An Argo profile with a low PV signal in the STMW layer (25.0 - 25.5 isopycnal layer) is marked as a red dot in Figure 3A. Figure 3B shows the meridional (19°–23°N) averaged PV distribution in the STMW layer, with low PV signals marked as black dots. Both the observation and OFES results show that there are obvious low PV signals intruding into the SCS, especially during the two periods of 2008-2009 and 2014-2016, and the low PV signals can travel a long distance in the SCS. We also found an Argo float (ID: 2901502) deployed east of the Philippine Islands in Sept. 2011 that captured a low PV signal east of the LS and then moved across the strait (Figure 4A). We display only the trajectory from 20 Sept. 2011 to 16 Apr. 2016. The measurements after 16 Apr. 2016 were mostly missing, although this Argo float traveled a great distance in the SCS until 1 Jan. 2017.

Figure 3

Figure 4

Although the low PV signal from the model is not as strong as that from the Argo profiles during 2008-2009, the OFES could well simulate the phenomenon that low PV signals move across the LS. According to the model validation above, the OFES could also reproduce the thermal and dynamic features in the NP well. Based on all the comparisons above, we conclude that the OFES model was suitable for this study.

3 Results

As shown in Figures 3, 4A, there is a possibility for the low PV water to move across the LS, especially during the 2008-2009 and 2014-2016 periods. Consequently, we selected three cases during these two periods to detect the low PV water intruding process with the OFES outputs. In the first case, a low PV signal reached and began moving across the LS in June 2008 and thus is called the 2008 case throughout the rest of this paper. The low PV signal in the second case, called the 2015 case below, propagated to the LS in November 2015. Finally, in the 2016 case, low PV water impinged on the LS in May 2016.

Figures 4B–D illustrate the trajectories of the low PV signal movement after moving across the LS, calculated with the OFES outputs, in the 2008, 2015 and 2016 cases. All three cases indicate that the low PV signal can not only intrude into the SCS but also travel a long distance in the SCS southwestward. We thus use OFES datasets to study how the low PV signal moves across the LS and how it can be transported such a long distance.

3.1 The process of low PV signals intruding into the SCS

The process of the low PV signal movement in the STMW core layer in the 2008 case is shown in Figure 5. According to the distribution of the velocity vector, the low PV water is trapped by an AE when reaching the LS. Figure 6 presents the low PV water movement along the 20°N section, and the isopycnal structure also indicates that the low PV signal is carried by an AE, called AE1 hereafter, east of 122°E. also demonstrated that an AE trapped the low PV water and carried it southwestward to the Kuroshio mainstream. In this study, the low PV water not only impinged on the Kuroshio but also began to be transported to the SCS from 25 Jun. 2008. In Figure 5, there was also anticyclonic flow (118°–122°E) west of AE1 on 7 July. The anticyclonic structure gradually intensified until 5 September and finally formed another AE, called AE2 below.

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 5 exhibits the evolution of AE2 west of AE1. Along with the development of AE2, some low PV water moved westward and gradually separated from the strong low PV signal in AE1. The low PV water seemed to be absorbed by AE2. In this 2008 case, vertical stratification was weak west of AE1 since the anticyclonic flow favored downwelling. The low PV signal was therefore transferred along the STMW layer (layers between the thick black lines in Figure 6) since the weak stratification, corresponding to a weak vertical gradient of potential density, was conducive to maintaining the low PV signal. The low PV water in turn promoted the formation of AE2. As shown in Figure 6, the eddy structure of AE2 was intensified after some low PV water was isolated from AE1, in accordance with previous studies that suggested that low PV water favors the formation of AEs with cores typically located in the subsurface layer (; ). This process of low PV water intrusion is presented as a relay of low PV water from AE1 to AE2.

The relay process in the 2015 case was similar to that in the 2008 case. Figure 7 shows a large, low PV signal moving to the LS from 19 Nov. 2015 with an AE (AE1). Another AE (AE2) gradually formed on 1 Dec. 2015 and began absorbing low PV water from AE1. Figure 8 exhibits the process of low PV signal movement and division in the STMW layer. According to Figures 7, 8, the eddy structure of AE2 became clearer from 18 Jan. 2016 and thus separated from AE1. After AE2 was isolated from AE1, it transported low PV water west and disappeared near 113°E (Figure 4C). The rest of the low PV water, trapped by AE1, moved along the coastline of Taiwan Island and gradually dissipated.

Figure 7

Figure 8

The 2016 case is slightly different from the other two cases. According to Figure 2B, low PV water intrusion was frequent during the period of 2014-2016. The relay of low PV water from AE1 to AE2 was sometimes continuous, such as in the 2016 case, when low PV signals began moving across the LS on 10 June 2016 once AE2 had formed on 29 May 2016 (Figures 9, 10). Compared with the 2008 and 2015 cases, the low PV signal from the NP was relatively weak. However, AE2 formed once AE1 reached the LS on 10 June 2016. In contrast to the other two cases, AE1 dissipated after most of the low PV water was trapped by AE2 on 28 July 2016. As the eddy structure of AE2 intensified on 9 Aug. 2016, the low PV water moved westward and disappeared near 113°E (Figure 4D).

Figure 9

Figure 10

Since AE2 and the low PV signal mutually maintained each other, AE2 could carry the low PV water over a long distance until it was eroded by local strong vertical stratification or AE2 weakened under the effect of the local wind stress curl. In the 2008 case, the low PV water propagated a long distance (Figures 4B–D) with both the horizontal scale of the low PV signal and AE2 shrinking (not shown). To confirm whether the low PV signal was transported from the NP, we compared the water mass properties of low PV water when it was trapped by AE1 (Figures 11A–C), trapped by AE2 (Figures 11D–F) and before it disappeared (Figures 11G–I). The low PV water, which was remarkably different from the surrounding waters (gray dots in Figure 11), was concentrated in the STMW layer during all three periods. The temperature range varied from 15°C to 18°C, while the salinity range varied from 34.6 to 34.9. Thus, the T-S distributions of low PV water were in accordance at the three moments, while the amount of low PV water gradually decreased along the trajectory. The low PV water moving along the trajectory can thus be considered to have originated from the STMW. The results confirm that the low PV signal originated from the NP and intruded into the SCS from the LS.

Figure 11

3.2 Conditions of the low PV water intrusion

As indicated by , the low PV signal originating from STMW can arrive in the LS area 5 years after STMW subduction; thus, the low PV signal occurs frequently in the LS area. However, not all the low PV water reaching the LS can intrude into the SCS. We compared all the cases in which low PV water eroded in AE1 with the cases in which the water mass could be relayed by AE2 and finally determined the reason why some low PV water cannot move farther westward.

We chose a case when strong low PV water reached the LS area on 14 May 2005 to illustrate the issue and refer to it below as the 2005 case. Figure 12 shows the process of low PV signal weakening after reaching the LS. The low PV water was also carried by an AE. There was a strong northwestward current southwest of Taiwan Island and thus strong positive velocity vorticity in the area. Upwelling was strengthened due to the positive vorticity, correlated with the isopycnal layer bending up (Figure 13). Unlike the stratification weakening in the intruding cases, vertical stratification was thus strong west of AE1 and was not able to maintain the low PV signal. Figure 13 shows that the vertical stratification is stronger west of 122°E than east. As a result, the low PV water could not climb up the isopycnal slope of the STMW layer but gradually weakened during movement. Meanwhile, the low PV water shrank, in accordance with the demise of AE1. The strong vertical stratification affected not only the low PV water transport but also the lifetime of AE1. The STMW layer increased and thinned due to the low PV signal weakening, and then AE1 weakened. This result indicates that positive velocity vorticity southwest of Taiwan Island does not favor the intrusion of low PV water into the SCS because the strong vertical stratification structure will not maintain a low PV signal. In conclusion, the low PV water can be relayed only when the velocity vorticity is negative west of AE1.

Figure 12

Figure 13

4 Summary and discussion

Due to the new developments in oceanic observations and eddy-resolving models, the effect of mesoscale eddies on the propagation of STMW has attracted considerable attention. Both observed and model analysis results have demonstrated that eddies are able to retain mode water and propagate westward over long distances (; ; ; ; ). With in situ observation data, found low PV water, trapped by an AE, located east of Taiwan Island (23°N, 120°-130°E). With the OFES dataset, found that low PV water from the STMW can reach the region east of the LS. Our study further demonstrates that low PV water could not only reach the LS but also intrude into the SCS. The results of this study indicate that low PV water intrusion is correlated with eddy activities in the eddy-resolving OFES dataset.

In this study with Argo float data, we first found that low PV water could move across the LS from the NP and intrude into the SCS (Figures 3A, 4A). This low PV water intrusion phenomenon is well reproduced by the OFES outputs in Figure 3B. We also illustrate the mechanism of low PV water movement across the LS with the OFES dataset. The results of the three cases described in Section 3 indicate that the low PV water can be relayed by two AEs (AE1 to the east and AE2 to the west) and then moves southwestward in the SCS when the velocity vorticity is negative west of AE1. The Argo floats stay at a depth of approximately 1000 m most of the time and thus may not always capture mesoscale eddies. However, an Argo float (ID: 2901502) captured a low PV signal east of the LS and then moved across the strait (Figure 4A). Figure 14 presents the variation in the SSH and sea surface current from the CMEMS satellite dataset during the period in which the 2901502 Argo moved across the LS. The Argo float (red dot in Figure 14) reached west of the LS and was located at the edge of a strong AE on 22 Jan. 2015. Then, an AE (AE1) departed from the large AE and moved northwestward in accordance with the movement of the Argo float. Another AE (AE2) gradually developed southwest of Taiwan Island on 3 Mar. 2015. The Argo float moved to the southwest of Taiwan Island and was trapped by AE2 on 13 Mar. 2015. Finally, AE2 was isolated from AE1 on 2 Apr. 2015. The results shown in Figures 4A, 14 indicate that low PV water could move across the LS. The observed intrusion process of the low PV water was correlated with eddy activities and was similar to the model results, thus validating the analysis and results from the model dataset.

Figure 14

We provide a schematic illustration of the mechanism of low PV water intrusion (Figure 15). Figures 15A, B show the process of the low PV water relay from AE1 to AE2, while Figures 15C, D show a situation in which low PV water cannot move across the LS. The vertical structure is weaker in Figure 15A west of 122°E than in Figure 15C. Consequently, the water mass is able to move along the STMW layer and maintain its low PV characteristics. The low PV signal also benefits the formation of AE2 after separation from AE1. Finally, AE2 sheds from AE1 and then carries low PV water farther west. In contrast, the low PV water shrinks due to the strong vertical stratification west of 122°E (Figures 15C, D). The strong positive velocity vorticity will not take in any low PV water from AE1. found that changes in the Kuroshio intrusion paths often induce eddies in the LS area; therefore, this velocity vorticity variation might be correlated with different intrusion paths of the Kuroshio intrusion.

Figure 15

A previous study has shown that there is a strong decadal signal in STMW subduction, as well as a PV anomaly in the LS area (), and LS transport can also convey climate change signals from the NP to the SCS (; ; ; ; ). In this study, both the observation and model results show that low PV water intrusion occurred during the 2008-2009 and 2014-2016 periods, during which El Niño events occurred. Consequently, the low PV water intruding into the SCS might be impacted by climate change events. This study is mainly conducted with cases that occur during low PV water intrusion periods, while further study will be conducted with long-term data series. We plan to detect the connection between low PV signal intrusion and climate change events, such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and ENSO, and reveal the effect of low PV water on hydrographic changes in the SCS.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

RW conducted data analysis and wrote the draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42106196, 42206032) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2022QD045).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

subtropical mode water, South China Sea, Luzon Strait (LS), mesoscale eddy, low potential vorticity water

Citation

Wang R, Ren Q, Nan F and Yu F (2023) A relay of anticyclonic eddies transferring North Pacific subtropical mode water into the South China Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 10:1106721. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1106721

Received

24 November 2022

Accepted

30 March 2023

Published

19 April 2023

Volume

10 - 2023

Edited by

Meilin Wu, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology (CAS), China

Reviewed by

Yongchui Zhang, National University of Defense Technology, China; Manuel Ruiz Villarreal, Centro Oceanográfico da Coruña, (CSIC), Spain; Yi Xu, East China Normal University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Fei Yu, ; Feng Nan,

This article was submitted to Marine Ecosystem Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics