You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Mar. Sci., 17 February 2023

Sec. Marine Conservation and Sustainability

Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1144982

Corrigendum: Strengthened multi-stakeholder linkages in valuation studies is critical for improved decision making outcomes for valuable mangroves – The Malaysian case study

  • 1. Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • 2. Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • 3. ICF, Plymouth, United Kingdom

  • 4. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom

  • 5. Plymouth School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom

Article metrics

View details

1,2k

Views

419

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in Figures 1, 2 as published. The images in Figures 1, 2 were incorrectly assigned. The corrected Figures 1, 2 and the captions appear below.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Map of Malaysia. Red stars indicate valuation study sites of collated mangrove ecosystem service valuation studies in Malaysia. Green patches overlaying the map indicate mangrove forest coverage (dataset from Bunting et al., 2018).

Figure 2

Figure 2

Summary of ecosystem service valuation (ESV) methodologies and ecosystem services that had been valued in Malaysia. CV = contingent valuation; MP = market price; BT = benefit transfer; RC = replacement cost; TC = travel cost; OT = others including the benefit transfer and ecosystem service valuation method (remote sensing).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    Bunting P. Rosenqvist A. Lucas R. Rebelo L-M. Hilarides L. Thomas N. et al (2018). The global mangrove watch – a new 2010 global baseline of mangrove extent. Remote Sens.10 (10), 1669. doi: 10.3390/rs10101669

Summary

Keywords

ecosystem service assessment, policy making, southeast Asia, natural resources, decision making, result dissemination

Citation

Lee SL, Then AY-H, Goh HC, Hattam C, Edwards-Jones A and Austen MC (2023) Corrigendum: Strengthened multi-stakeholder linkages in valuation studies is critical for improved decision making outcomes for valuable mangroves – The Malaysian case study. Front. Mar. Sci. 10:1144982. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1144982

Received

15 January 2023

Accepted

06 February 2023

Published

17 February 2023

Volume

10 - 2023

Edited and reviewed by

Laura Airoldi, University of Padova Chioggia Hydrobiological Station, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Amy Yee-Hui Then, ; Melanie C. Austen,

This article was submitted to Marine Conservation and Sustainability, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics