ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Coral Reef Research
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1581753
Comprehensive Assessment of Chemical and Microbial Inducers for Coral Larval Settlement Across Diverse Coral Species
Provisionally accepted- 1Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou, China
- 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China
- 3Xisha Marine Environmental National Observation and Research Station, Sansha, China
- 4Sanya National Marine Ecosystem Research Station, Hainan Tropical Marine Biology Research Station, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Sanya, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Coral restoration initiatives increasingly prioritize larval settlement and post-settlement survival. However, the species-specific effectiveness of settlement inducers remains underexplored. This study systematically evaluated three settlement inducers—Crustose coralline algae (CCA), Chemical (CaCl2), and Microbial (Metabacillus sp. cB07)—across seven coral species, including brooders and broadcast spawners. Coral larvae were exposed to gradient concentrations of inducers to gain an optimal inducer concentration and treatment duration and evaluate their effects on larvae survivorship, metamorphosis, and settlement. Subsequently, for both planula larvae and recruits treated by optimized settlement-inducing procedures, metabolic rates and morphology, post-settlement survival, and growth indicators were quantified. Results revealed that the optimal concentration and treatment duration of CaCl2 (10–60 mmol/L) and strain cB07 (3 × 106–3 × 107 cfu/mL) varied significantly across different coral species. Both CaCl2 and cB07 demonstrated broad-spectrum induction activity comparable to CCA, among the seven tested coral species. Compared with the control (up to 13.3% within 7 days), CCA showed the highest settlement rates (43.3%–93.3%) within 1–2 days, while CaCl2 exhibited moderate effectiveness (23.3%–60.3%) within 0.5–4 days, and cB07 displayed comparable efficacy (26.7%–60.0%) within 2–4 days. The tested inducers exhibited distinct biological effects: CaCl2 accelerated metamorphosis but reduced survival rates in sensitive species, whereas cB07 delayed metamorphosis and demonstrated higher toxicity, which was associated with significantly suppressed respiratory rates. In the post-settlement phase, recruits induced by CCA and CaCl2 showed higher survival and calcification rates compared to those induced by cB07. These findings highlight the importance of customizing inducer protocols based on the unique needs and life histories of different coral species. By integrating physiological and ecological perspectives, this study provides actionable guidelines for optimizing coral restoration strategies amidst escalating anthropogenic and climatic threats.
Keywords: Coral restoration, larval settlement, Post-settlement survival, broad-spectrum inducers, species-specificity, metabolic trade-offs
Received: 23 Feb 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Yang, Dong, Li, Chen, Tang, Zhang and Ling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qingsong Yang, Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou, China
Juan Ling, Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.