Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Med., 15 October 2025

Sec. Pulmonary Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1712847

Correction: Meta-analysis of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation after invasive mechanical ventilation

This article is a correction to:

  1. Meta-analysis of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation after invasive mechanical ventilation

    1. Read original article
Mailidan Maimaitiniyazi,Mailidan Maimaitiniyazi1,2Tuersunayi Yisimitila,Tuersunayi Yisimitila1,2Muyesaier Maimaitiniyazi,Muyesaier Maimaitiniyazi1,2Meiheliya Maisuti,Meiheliya Maisuti1,2Ailifeire Aihaiti,Ailifeire Aihaiti1,2Zhang Chenfei,Zhang Chenfei1,2Yilizhati NijiatiYilizhati Nijiati1Muyesai Nijiati Muyesai Nijiati1*
  • 1Emergency Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Ürümqi, China
  • 2Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, China

A Correction on
Meta-analysis of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation after invasive mechanical ventilation

by Maimaitiniyazi, M., Yisimitila, T., Maimaitiniyazi, M., Maisuti, M., Aihaiti, A., Chenfei, Z., Nijiati, Y., and Nijiati, M. (2025). Front. Med. 12:1594145. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1594145

Affiliation 2 “Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, China” was omitted from the paper. This affiliation has now been added for authors Mailidan Maimaitiniyazi, Tuersunayi Yisimitila, Muyesaier Maimaitiniyazi, Meiheliya Maisuti, Ailifeire Aihaiti, and Zhang Chenfei.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: HFNC, NIV, invasive mechanical ventilation, meta-analysis, respiratory failure

Citation: Maimaitiniyazi M, Yisimitila T, Maimaitiniyazi M, Maisuti M, Aihaiti A, Chenfei Z, Nijiati Y and Nijiati M (2025) Correction: Meta-analysis of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation after invasive mechanical ventilation. Front. Med. 12:1712847. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1712847

Received: 25 September 2025; Accepted: 29 September 2025;
Published: 15 October 2025.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2025 Maimaitiniyazi, Yisimitila, Maimaitiniyazi, Maisuti, Aihaiti, Chenfei, Nijiati and Nijiati. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Muyesai Nijiati, bXV5YXNzYXIxMUBhbGl5dW4uY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.