You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Ophthalmology

Enhanced Astigmatism Correction Accuracy with Image-Guided Toric ICL Implantation: A Comparative Clinical Analysis with Manual Axis Marking

  • 1. The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University,Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center,Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, China

  • 2. The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

  • 3. Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center,Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, China

  • 4. Department of Ophthalmology,Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China

Article metrics

View details

455

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Purpose:This study compared clinical outcomes of toric intraocular collamer lens (TICL) implantation for myopia and astigmatism correction using image-guided navigation versus manual astigmatic marker alignment, evaluating postoperative astigmatism correction accuracy. Methods:A retrospective analysis included 250 patients (467 eyes) undergoing TICL implantation between January and June 2023. Patients were divided into manual (slit-lamp axis marking) and image-guided (navigation-adjusted lens positioning) groups. Preoperative parameters were comparable. Postoperative visual acuity, refraction, and astigmatism vector analysis (TIA, SIA, DV, CI, AE) were assessed at 3 months. Results:No significant differences were observed in preoperative parameters, postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), or corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P>0.05). However, sphere, cylinder, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) differed significantly (P<0.05). Vector analysis revealed no intergroup difference in target-induced astigmatism (TIA) (P>0.05), but surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), absolute difference vector (DV), correction index (CI), and nd absolute Angle of Error (AE) showed significant improvements in the image-guided group (P<0.05). Arithmetic AE did not differ between groups (P>0.05). No intraoperative/postoperative complications (e.g., corneal edema, iris prolapse) occurred. Conclusion :Image-guided TICL implantation yielded superior visual outcomes and greater astigmatism correction accuracy compared to manual marking, with no complications reported. This highlights the clinical advantage of navigation systems in optimizing refractive precision.

Summary

Keywords

Alpins vector analysis, Astigmatism, Image-guided, Manual marking, TICL

Received

01 August 2025

Accepted

30 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Li, Fu, Liu, Liu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jianzhang Hu

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics