Abstract
Candida albicans is a polymorphic opportunistic fungal pathogen normally residing as commensal on mucosal surfaces, skin and gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. However, in immunocompromised patients C. albicans can cause superficial mucosal infections or life-threatening disseminated candidemia. A change in physiological conditions triggers a cascade of molecular events leading to morphogenetic alterations and increased resistance to damage induced by host defenses. The complex biology of this human pathogen is reflected in its morphological plasticity and reinforced by the ability to ambiguously translate the universal leucine CUG codon predominantly as serine, but also as leucine. Mistranslation affects more than half of C. albicans proteome and it is widespread across many biological processes. A previous analysis of CTG-codon containing gene products in C. albicans suggested that codon ambiguity subtly shapes protein function and might have a pivotal role in signaling cascades associated with morphological changes and pathogenesis. In this review we further explore this hypothesis by highlighting the role of ambiguous decoding in macromolecular recognition of key effector proteins associated with the regulation of signal transduction cascades and the cell cycle, which are critical processes for C. albicans morphogenic plasticity under a variety of environmental conditions.
Candida albicans adaptation to the host
Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans, that lives as commensal on the skin and mucosal surfaces of healthy individuals (Odds et al., 2001). In response to changes in environmental conditions, C. albicans can convert into a disease-causing pathogen, resulting in oral, gastrointestinal and vaginal candidiasis or ultimately lead to a systemic candidemia in immunocompromised individuals. In fact, candidiasis is among the leading nosocomial infections worldwide, and mortality rates resulting from widespread systemic infections range between 15 and 35% (Papon et al., 2013). An important feature of C. albicans that elicits its adaptation to different environmental niches and evasion from threats generated by the host immune defenses is its polymorphic phenotype. C. albicans is able to reversibly switch between distinct morphogenic states: the yeast form and the filamentous pseudohyphal or hyphal forms (Sudbery, 2011). Furthermore, C. albicans can produce biofilms, which consist of a mixed population of yeast, pseudohyphae and hyphae (Douglas, 2003; Blankenship and Mitchell, 2006) and represent a high risk factor for infection and disease (Douglas, 2002, 2003). Morphological transitions have been correlated with a rapid remodeling of the cell transcriptional program in order to perfectly adapt to microenvironmental changes (Shapiro et al., 2011; Sudbery, 2011; Gow et al., 2012). Albeit some virulence-associated gene products were found to modulate C. albicans pathogenicity independently of morphogenesis (Noble et al., 2010), the mechanism of morphological switching has proven its relevance in many facets of C. albicans virulence (adhesion, invasion, and bloodstream propagation) (Gow et al., 2012). The diversity required for survival is generated by sequential activation of highly coordinated signaling pathways, in response to multiple stress factors and/or damage induced by antifungal drugs (Shapiro et al., 2011).
The CTG-clade genetic code: a unique sense-to-sense codon reassignment
Throughout evolution the standard genetic code suffered several alterations both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. The discovery of these alterations, over the last 30 years, “thawed” the frozen accident hypothesis for the genetic code (Crick, 1968). Identified natural genetic code alterations include the reassignment of the identity of both sense and nonsense codons, as well as codon unassignment (Knight et al., 2001; Miranda et al., 2006; Pouplana et al., 2014). Genetic code flexibility was further supported by its expansion to incorporate selenocysteine (Sec, 21st amino acid), pyrrolysine (Pyl, 22nd amino acid) (Zhang and Gladyshev, 2007) and non-natural amino acids (Chatterjee et al., 2012). Incorporation of Sec has been described in diverse enzymes of all kingdoms, from bacteria to eukaryotes (Bock and Stadtman, 1988). This mechanism of translational recoding evolved in order to overcome the presence of a UGA stop codon within the active site of proteins and prevent the translation of truncated, nonfunctional enzymes. The incorporation of Sec at UGA position, using a selenocysteine-specific tRNA, tRNASec, is regulated by the presence of a Sec insertion sequence (SECIS) at the stem-loop of the 3′-untranslated region of selenoprotein-encoding mRNAs (Bock et al., 1991; Arner, 2010) and, in higher eukaryotes, also within the mRNAs coding region (Mix et al., 2007). Sec insertion enhances the enzymes' kinetic efficiency when compared to its Cys-containing counterparts (Bock et al., 1991; Arner, 2010). Pyl incorporation has been described in methyltransferases from Methanosarcineace species (Srinivasan et al., 2002), Desulfitobacterium hafniense (Herring et al., 2007) and symbiotic deltaproteobacterium of the gutless worm Olavius algarvensis (Zhang and Gladyshev, 2007) that harbor a UAG stop codon within the active site and a pyrrolysine insertion sequence (PYLIS) downstream in the mRNA. Pyl is incorporated during translation, similar to standard amino acids, due to the presence of a specific tRNA harboring a CUA anticodon, the PylT-derived tRNA, and a pylS gene, encoding an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase that charges the tRNA with Pyl (Srinivasan et al., 2002). Insertion of non-natural amino acids has been described in Mycoplasma capricolum (Yamao et al., 1985) and in metazoan mitochondria (Yokobori et al., 2001) where the universal stop codon UGA is translated as tryptophan. In several ciliate species the stop codons UAA and UAG were also reassigned to code for glutamine (Tourancheau et al., 1995), while in other representatives (Euplotes genus) glutamine codon usage is normal but the UGA stop codon is translated as cysteine (Meyer et al., 1991; Tourancheau et al., 1995). Furthermore, [PSI+], a non-chromosomal gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, was shown to be a prion of Sup35, a translation-termination factor of S. cerevisiae (Tuite and Cox, 2007). Similar to sup35 mutations, the [PSI+] prion results in increased read-through of termination codons.
Therefore, in several organisms codon duality is related to the presence of signature motifs in the mRNA that define whether the amino acid is inserted or a terminator tRNA binds to the mRNA, resulting in reassigned codons encoding different amino acids or in truncated proteins, respectively. However, in a particular group of organisms codon duality refers to the ambiguous translation of a codon with arbitrary incorporation of two amino acids depending solely on the relative percentage of tRNAs charged with each of the amino acids. This unique sense-to-sense codon reassignment has been described in the CTG-clade species, which includes the human pathogen C. albicans (Tuite and Santos, 1996; Santos et al., 1997; Suzuki et al., 1997). In those species, the universal leucine CUG codon is decoded predominantly as serine, but also as leucine (Ohama et al., 1993; Santos et al., 2011). CUG decoding ambiguity evolved as the result of a mutation in a serine tRNA: the insertion of an adenosine in the anticodon loop of this molecular adaptor generated a mutant serine tRNA with a CAG anticodon (tRNA(CAG)) that matches the CUG codon sequence (Santos et al., 1993). Further changes in the tRNA(CAG) sequence allowed its specific recognition both by seryl- (SerRS) and leucyl-tRNA(LeuRS) synthetases, which aminoacylate this unique tRNA(CAG) with serine or leucine, respectively (Figure 1A). This CUG codon dependent mechanism generates ambiguous proteins and expands the proteome of CTG-clade species (6438 CTG-containing genes can potentially encode 283 billion proteins) (Rocha et al., 2011; Santos et al., 2011), further contributing to the enormous biological complexity of these yeasts, many of which are infectious agents.
Figure 1
The dual meaning of the CUG codon: a mechanism driving structural and functional proteome plasticity with potential implications in pathogenesis
CUG codons are present in more than half of C. albicans coding genes, most of which (~81%) are expressed at low levels (Santos et al., 2011). The majority of the CUG-encoded residues (from hereon named CUG-residues) are present in proteins with functions in plasma and nuclear membranes, Golgi to endosome and Golgi to vacuole transport, DNA repair, regulation of redox homeostasis, DNA replication, chromatin silencing, mRNA splicing, Golgi to plasma membrane transport, mitosis, cytokinesis and protein targeting (Santos et al., 2011).
Comparative proteome analysis of CTG—containing genes in CTG-clade species and related yeasts, showed that ambiguous CUG decoding led to a genome-wide alteration of CUG codon positions: CUG-residues in functionally and structurally relevant positions were mutated to alternative leucine codons (Butler et al., 2009; Rocha et al., 2011). The pressure to avoid excessive accumulation of unfolded proteins, led to the disappearance of the ancestral CUG codons from the genome of CTG-clade species and the introduction of new CUG codons (26 148 codons) with a frequency of 1–38 CTGs per gene, predominantly in positions of low sequence conservation or where serine (about 30% of CUG codons) or other polar amino acid codons were preferred in the open reading frames (ORFs) of related gene products (Butler et al., 2009; Rocha et al., 2011; Santos et al., 2011). A comparative analysis of CTG-containing ORFs suggests that ambiguous decoding is generally well-tolerated since most CUG-residues are partially exposed to the solvent and well distributed between α-helical regions, where leucine is generally favored, and loops, where serine residues are frequently found (Rocha et al., 2011). Evolutionary relocation of CUG-residues to non-conserved regions of the proteins occurred in ~90% of the analyzed gene products. This relocation was apparently driven by the requirement to minimize the impact of codon duality in the structure and function of the affected proteins. In particular, the position of the CUG-residues seems to be optimally suited to prevent the massive protein misfolding that would result from incorporation of polar serine residues in the proteins' hydrophobic cores, where generally leucine residues are favored.
Interestingly, several pieces of evidence favor the hypothesis that, although without drastic structural consequences, the insertion of a serine or leucine within a given position is unlikely to have a completely neutral effect in the overall protein function with consequences in C. albicans homeostasis. This is underscored by (i) the frequently observed inability to functionally complement S. cerevisiae deletion strains with C. albicans CTG-codon containing genes (Feketova et al., 2010), and (ii) the fact that genetic manipulation of C. albicans to force an increase in leucine incorporation induces morphological phenotypes, which are associated with the expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and hyphal growth (Gomes et al., 2007).
A striking example of the functional impact of CUG-residue identity is C. albicans eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), containing a non-conserved CUG-residue (position 166) on the protein surface, that when heterologously expressed in S. cerevisiae (where the CUG codon is only translated as leucine) affects the translation rate and the cellular viability of the resulting strain at higher temperatures, in comparison to the wild type yeast (Feketova et al., 2010). Recently, it was also demonstrated that CUG-residue identity has functional consequences in SerRS and LeuRS, the two central players in C. albicans CUG codon translation machinery (Rocha et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2013). These aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have CUG-residues (Figure 1A) in well conserved regions and insertion of a serine or leucine influences their tRNA aminoacylation activities, with the leucine variants displaying increased enzymatic activity in vitro (Rocha et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2013). Nonetheless, the global effect of these differences in C. albicans biology and virulence remains unknown. Although the comparative values for affinities of C. albicans SerRS and LeuRS isofoms toward the tRNA(CAG) are still undetermined, under physiological conditions SerRS is the main tRNA(CAG)-charging enzyme and LeuRS appears to be a poor competitor since most of the CUG-residues are translated as serine (Gomes et al., 2007; Santos et al., 2011).
Increasing leucine incorporation levels to 28% by genetic manipulation of C. albicans, did not disturb the growth rates but modified cell morphology (Figure 1B) and induced expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and hyphal growth (Gomes et al., 2007), concomitantly with a decreased susceptibility to phagocytosis by murine macrophages (Miranda et al., 2013). Importantly, the incorporation of leucine at CUG positions at levels above 50% leads to dramatic alterations in the expression of genes involved in various metabolic networks that consequently affect C. albicans growth rate, phenotype, drug resistance and host immune cell responses (Bezerra et al., 2013). Overall, the identity of the CUG-residue can have functional consequences, even when located on less conserved positions or at the protein surface, influencing post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) and globally interfering with macromolecular recognition. Therefore, ambiguous insertion of serine or leucine might disturb numerous intracellular processes and contribute to subtle rearrangements of C. albicans surface antigens, affecting a vast array of cellular functions with yet unknown consequences. These ambiguous proteins may further constitute a general strategy of the pathogen to increase diversity and survival in varied host niches, mislead/evade the host immune system and accelerate the evolution of drug resistance. Taken together, these data suggest that the levels of serine/leucine incorporation at CUG positions will have widespread consequences in C. albicans physiology with potential implications in morphogenesis and host macrophage interactions. Still, the key molecular players linking CUG-residue identity with the observed morphogenetic changes remain so far unidentified.
Curiously, in a small subset of C. albicans proteins (10% of CUG-residue containing proteins) CUG-residues are located at conserved active sites, macromolecular recognition sites or in their vicinity, where serine or leucine incorporation could differentially modulate protein function, even without significant structural alterations. In fact, CUG-residues are overrepresented in proteins involved in signal transduction cascades that regulate C. albicans cell division, morphogenesis and cell wall composition (Figure 2). Interestingly, some of these proteins are key regulators in cell signaling cascades associated with morphological changes (Csank et al., 1998; Guhad et al., 1998; Feng et al., 1999; Leberer et al., 2001; Bensen et al., 2005; Galán-Díez et al., 2010), which have been widely correlated with C. albicans virulence (Alonso-Monge et al., 1999; San-Blas et al., 2000; Romani et al., 2003; Kumamoto and Vinces, 2005; Roman et al., 2007). One possible hypothesis is that a number of CUG-residues might have been strategically selected during evolution to act as molecular sensors, controlling protein function through environmentally-driven fluctuations in serine and leucine incorporation levels (Rocha et al., 2011).
Figure 2
In the following sections the effect of CUG ambiguity will be highlighted in the structure and function of key regulatory proteins associated with the central Ras-dependent signaling pathways (Ras1 GTPase and CEK1 MAP kinase) and the regulation of cell cycle (Cbl2).
Impact of CUG ambiguity in cell signaling pathways
CUG-residues in conserved positions are overrepresented in components of multi-enzymatic signal transduction cascades, stringently regulated by dynamic protein-protein interactions (Good et al., 2009), such as the Ras1-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent pathways (Figure 2, CUG-encoded proteins are represented by filled boxes). Two major transcription factors, Cph1 (targeted by MAPK) and Efg1 (targeted by the cAMP-dependent cascade) control the expression of genes required for hyphal growth (Figure 2) (Sudbery, 2011). The signaling cascades respond to environmental stimuli, activating the Ras1 GTPase (one CUG-residue), a branching point in the MAPK and cAMP-dependent pathways (Hogan and Sundstrom, 2009; Sudbery, 2011). Although the molecular details of Ras1 activation remain elusive, its direct association to the adenylyl cyclase Cyr1 (or Cdc35, four CUG-residues), the only adenylyl cyclase described in C. albicans, is essential for cAMP synthesis. The cAMP-dependent PKA complex with the catalytic subunits Tpk1 and Tpk2 (four CUG-residues) and the regulatory subunit Bcy1 (one CUG-residue) (Giacometti et al., 2012), activates transcription factors regulating the expression of virulence genes (e.g., ALS3, HWP1) (Shapiro et al., 2011). The filamentous growth MAPK cascade responds to nutrient restriction targeting the transcription factor Cph1. It includes the kinase Cst20, the MAPKKK Ste11, the MAPKK Hst7 (five CUG-residues), the scaffold protein Cst5 (three CUG-residues) and the MAPK Cek1 (one CUG-residue) (Figure 2). This MAPK pathway was recently shown to be reprogrammed within the CTG-clade, where adjustments occurred in the scaffold protein Cst5, that is significantly smaller than its S. cerevisiae ortholog (Cõte et al., 2011).
Ras1—a central GTPase at the crossroad between MAPK and c-AMP signaling pathways
Ras is a highly conserved GTPase that acts as a molecular sensor of environmental stress signals, such as temperature and nutrient deprivation, regulating two downstream signaling cascades, the MAPK pathway and the cAMP-dependent pathway (Figure 2). Ras is a highly dynamic GTP hydrolysing enzyme, whose conformation switches between active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound state (Bourne et al., 1991). Two conserved motifs in the proximity of the catalytic site are critical for GTP hydrolysis, Switch I and Switch II (Campbell et al., 1998). While Switch I is crucial for GDP release and suffers significant conformational changes required for the release of the bound nucleotide, Switch II motif is responsible for the activation of the catalytic water required for GTP hydrolysis (Pai et al., 1990; Tong et al., 1991; Buhrman et al., 2010).
C. albicans Ras1 shares 67% amino acid sequence identity with the well-characterized human Ras (hRas), for which the three-dimensional structure of the catalytic domain is known (Buhrman et al., 2010) (Table 1). In C. albicans, the CUG-residue at position 66 is strictly conserved and structurally equivalent to hRas Ser65 (Figure 3A, red star). This residue is positioned at the surface of the mobile Switch II region (Figure 3B, red spheres) being involved in a network of polar interactions that bridge Switch II and Switch I, which is strictly conserved in C. albicans Ras1 (Figure 3C). In particular, Ser65 hydrogen bonds to the main-chain carbonyl of Glu62, contributing to maintain the optimal conformation of Switch II loop residues (including the catalytic Gln61), which are required for stabilization of the nucleotide γ-phosphate (Figure 3C). Therefore, the exchange of serine for leucine at the CUG position of C. albicans Ras1 is predicted to partly destabilize this hydrogen bond network, which might result in alterations in the conformation/mobility of the Switch II loop and impact Ras1 catalytic activity. In fact, further support for the relevance of this polar interaction network for Ras activity stems from analysis of human (hRas) or S. cerevisiae Ras1 homologs, where it was shown that Gln61 mutations lock the protein in the active GTP-bound conformation, resulting in transiently activated phenotypes (Buhrman et al., 2007).
Table 1
| Biological processes | Protein | CUG-residue | Template structure (PDB accession code)# | Amino acid sequence identity (%) | QMEAN score* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein translation | LeuRS | 919 | T. termophilus isoleucyl-tRNA synthetatse (1JZQ) | 34 | 0.29 |
| Ras signaling | Ras1 | 66 | Human Ras (3K8Y) | 67 | 0.76 |
| Csc25 (GEF) | 939; 1059 | Human Sos1-Ras complex (1BKD) | 32 | 0.60 | |
| Ira2 (GAP) | 1312; 1383; 1397 | Human Ras-GAP334 complex (1WQ1) | 30 | 0.53 | |
| MAPK pathway | Cek1 | 199 | S. cerevisiae Fus3 (2B9F) | 64 | 0.70 |
| Cell cycle | Clb2 | 301; 383 | Human cyclin B1 (2B9R) | 39 | 0.66 |
| Cdc28 | – | Human Cdk2-Cyclin B1 complex (2JGZ) | 67 | 0.77 |
Overview of analyzed C. albicans proteins.
The selected experimental three-dimensional structures were used as templates in SWISS-MODEL (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) (Arnold et al., 2006) for calculating homology models of C. albicans proteins, from which secondary structure elements were inferred and used in sequence alignments shown in Figures 3A, 5A, 6A,D.
The quality of homology models was analyzed with the Qualitative Model Energy ANalysis (QMEAN) server (Benkert et al., 2008, 2009). The QMEAN score is a composite score consisting of a linear combination of six terms: Cβ interaction energy, all-atom pairwise energy, solvation energy, torsion angle energy, secondary structure agreement (SSE_agree) and solvent accessibility agreement (ACC_agree). The value associated to the QMEAN-score ranges between 0 and 1 with higher values for more reliable models. C. albicans LeuRS model is of insufficient quality for detailed structural analysis and was exclusively used for the schematic representation shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 3
Ras GTPase activity is intrinsically low and physiologically regulated by interaction with two distinct families of proteins: positive regulators (Guanidine Exchange Factors, GEFs), and negative regulators (GTPase Activating Proteins, GAPs) (Boguski and Mccormick, 1993). GEF proteins enhance Ras activity by promoting the release of bound GDP and the uptake of new GTP (Boriack-Sjodin et al., 1998) in response to the upstream stimuli. In contrast, GAP proteins accelerate the slow intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis by several orders of magnitude (Scheffzek et al., 1997). Importantly, the Ras Switch regions are central for recognition by GEFs and GAPs (Figures 4A,B), further suggesting a role for CUG-residue identity in C. albicans Ras1-GTP recycling.
Figure 4
C. albicans Csc25 displays 32% amino acid sequence identity with the guanine-nucleotide-exchange-factor region of the human GEF, Son-of-sevenless 1 (comprising residues 564–1049, referred to as Sos1), for which the three-dimensional structure in complex with hRas is known (Boriack-Sjodin et al., 1998) (Table 1). The structure of the Sos1-hRas complex revealed that Sos1 is composed of two distinct α-helical domains. While the Sos1 C-terminal domain comprises the hRas interaction region, the N-terminal region displays predominantly a structural role, contributing for the stabilization of the helical hairpin that inserts into hRas active site, forcing the displacement of Switch II region, occupying the magnesium binding site and triggering nucleotide exchange (Figure 4A). The functionally important features of Sos1 structure appear to be preserved in Csc25, and the interaction surface is relatively well conserved. Particularly relevant is the conservation of the residues at the interface between Csc25 and Ras1, where Switch II plays a central role (Boriack-Sjodin et al., 1998) (Figure 4A). In the Sos1-hRas complex, most surface residues of Switch II interact with hRas (Boriack-Sjodin et al., 1998). Considering the tight interaction between Sos1 and hRas, it is predictable that the modification of the conserved serine by a leucine at position 66 in C. albicans Ras1 (topologically equivalent to position 65 in hRas) will interfere with Csc25 recognition with consequences for GDP/GTP exchange. Interestingly, Csc25 contains four CUG-residues, two of them located within the conserved nucleotide-exchange-factor region (positions 939 and 1059, structurally equivalent to Sos1 Lys636 and Ser766) (Figure 4A, spheres). In particular, the CUG-residue at position 939 in C. albicans Csc25 is located in the structural N-terminal region, adjacent to the topologically equivalent helical hairpin in Sos1. Therefore, it is predictable that modification of CUG-residue identity at this position within Csc25 might additionally affect its interaction with Ras1, further modulating the complex mechanisms of molecular recognition in this Ras-dependent signaling pathway.
C. albicans Ira2 is the GAP responsible for repression of Ras1 activity (Nobile et al., 2012). Ira2 displays 30% amino acid sequence identity with the catalytic region of human GAP, p120GAP (residues 714–1047, from hereon named GAP334), for which the three-dimensional structure in complex with hRas has been determined (Scheffzek et al., 1997) (Table 1). hRas binds to the shallow groove of GAP334, and interaction results in the stabilization of hRas Switch II (Scheffzek et al., 1997). The interaction interface between GAP334 and hRas is well conserved in Candida species orthologs, particularly in the proximity of Ras1 Switch II region (Figure 4B). In this region, Switch II is stabilized by a combination of polar and hydrophobic interactions involving invariant residues such as Tyr64, Glu62 and Gln61 from hRas (equivalent to Tyr65, Glu63 and Gln62 in C. albicans Ras1), and Leu902, Arg749, and Arg789 in GAP334 (equivalent to Leu1424, Asn1281, and Arg1320 in Ira2). Importantly, the conserved interaction between hRas Gln61 and GAP334 Arg789, poises the side chain of the catalytic residue for optimal GTP hydrolysis. Considering that the Ras1 CUG-residue is located in the proximity of the Ras1-Ira2 interface, the presence of a leucine or a serine at this region is likely to modify the tight packing between these two proteins and interfere with the GAP-modulated activation of Ras1 GTPase activity. Curiously, Ira2 contains 11 CUG-residues, from which only three (1312, 1383, and 1397) are located within the catalytic and structurally characterized region of GAP and are structurally equivalent to GAP334 Glu781, Lys858, and Tyr872 (Figure 4B, spheres). All these CUG-residues are predicted to be located at the protein surface and primarily in non-conserved positions, although the full impact of CUG identity for the assembly and function of the GAP-Ras complex remains to be established.
In C. albicans, Ras1-dependent pathways regulate the downstream activity of transcription factors Cph1 and Efg1 that control the expression of genes responsible for the tight control of morphogenesis and virulence (Figure 2) (Leberer et al., 1997, 2001; Feng et al., 1999). In fact, in response to nitrogen starvation C. albicans Ras1 is activated through a transmembrane ammonium permease receptor (Mep) controlling yeast-to-hypha morphogenesis through the activation of C. albicans polarized growth (Shapiro et al., 2011). Deletion of C. albicans RAS1 gene leads to an early entry in stationary phase, increased resistance to H2O2, higher sensitivity to heavy metal Co2+ (Zhu et al., 2009), repression of CO2-induced white-to-opaque switching (Huang et al., 2009) and to the inhibition of serum-induced germ tubes and hyphae formation (Feng et al., 1999). The link between Ras1 and morphogenesis is highlighted by the identification of point mutations in RAS1 gene directly affecting C. albicans morphology. In particular the Gly-to-Val mutation at position 13, within the Ras1 active site, leads to a dominant active Ras1 with consequent increased hyphal growth. On the other hand, the mutation of Gly16 to Ala16, also at the Ras1 active site, represses Ras1 activity and C. albicans hyphal growth (Feng et al., 1999). So far, experimental evidence providing a direct link between CUG ambiguity in the molecular machinery regulating Ras1 GTPase activity and their influence on C. albicans virulence is still lacking. However, this structural analysis shows that a conserved CUG-residue is located in the functional Switch II region of Ras1, close to the GAP and GEF interaction surface, hinting that Ras1 CUG-residue identity might affect the flow of the downstream MAPK- and cAMP-dependent protein kinase pathways, ultimately explaining the morphological changes observed in engineered C. albicans cells upon increased leucine incorporation (Gomes et al., 2007).
Cek1 MAP kinase
The C. albicans MAP kinase Cek1, displays an invariant CUG-residue at position 199 (Figure 5A). This MAPK shares 58% of amino acid sequence identity with S. cerevisiae Fus3, for which the crystal structure has been determined (Remenyi et al., 2005) (Table 1). The CUG-residue is structurally equivalent to Fus3 Ser141 (Figure 5B, red sphere), located within a conserved polar pocket at the ATP binding cleft, and stabilizing a magnesium-bound water molecule (Figure 5C). Insertion of a leucine at position 199 would be highly unfavorable leading to the destabilization of magnesium coordination and potentially interfering with nucleotide binding. Importantly, the MAPK pathway, highly dependent on protein-protein interactions for signal transduction, is also highly enriched in proteins containing CUG-residues (Figure 2). Curiously, several facts point to an interesting remodeling of the molecular interaction networks associated with the MAPK signal transduction pathways in C. albicans (Stynen et al., 2010). Despite the high amino acid sequence identity between C. albicans proteins and their orthologs from S. cerevisiae, recent data showed that the disappearance of the Fus3-binding vWA (von Willebrand type A) domain from the scaffold protein Cst5 reshaped the protein-protein interactions in this essential signaling pathway (Zalatan et al., 2012). The relevance of CUG-residue identity for reshaping the molecular surface of the proteins associated in this interaction network is highlighted by discrepancies between the Cek1 interaction networks identified by yeast-two-hybrid assays in S. cerevisiae (where all CUG codons are translated as leucine) (Cõte et al., 2011) and C. albicans (Stynen et al., 2010). Therefore CUG-residue decoding as a serine might be required for correct docking interactions to occur, and insertion of leucine at these positions is expected to interfere with the delicate balance between protein interactions that leads to target protein phosphorylation and the correct signal transduction flow.
Figure 5
In C. albicans distinct stimuli such as starvation, nitrogen deprivation, oxidative and osmotic stress, exposure to serum or H2O2, increased temperature and low pH activate cell signaling cascades such as the MAPK pathway (Figure 2). The MAPK cascade targets the downstream transcription factor Cph1, which controls the expression of genes required for morphological switching (Sudbery, 2011; Yi et al., 2011) cell wall integrity, host recognition (Galán-Díez et al., 2010), pheromone-activated mating and biofilm formation (Cõte et al., 2011; Yi et al., 2011). A previous report showed that C. albicans CEK1 homozygous null mutants display lower ability to develop hyphae, which is reverted once CEK1 gene is reintegrated in the genome, suggesting an important role for Cek1 in the control of morphogenesis (Csank et al., 1998). Moreover, Cek1 appears to confer resistance to cell wall disturbing agents, namely Calcofluor White and Congo Red, and to reduce flocculation (Li et al., 2009). Since host-pathogen interactions are mediated mainly through C. albicans cell wall, whose composition is regulated by the Cek1-mediated MAPK pathway (Csank et al., 1998; Sudbery, 2011), this kinase plays a crucial role in C. albicans pathogenicity.
Although the full consequences of these MAPK-activating stimuli on the relative Ser/Leu insertion at CUG-encoded sites is still undisclosed, the structural analysis of the Cek1 CUG-residue position reveals that an increased insertion of leucine at this location is expected to have a functional impact. Studying the molecular interactions regulating this MAPK and how they are shaped by CUG-residue identity will likely provide relevant data to further understand the impact of this codon reassignment for C. albicans cell wall composition, morphogenesis and virulence.
Ambiguous CUG decoding in Clb2, an essential cyclin in C. albicans cell cycle
C. albicans cyclin Clb2, an essential B-type cyclin harboring two CUG-residues, one of which at a strictly conserved site (Figure 6A, red stars), is involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and morphogenesis (Lew and Reed, 1993; Bensen et al., 2005) through binding/activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). In C. albicans, the expression and function of cyclins appears to be morphology-dependent: while some cyclins perform their function merely in the yeast form, others are only active throughout the hyphal form (Lew and Reed, 1993; Loeb et al., 1999; Bensen et al., 2005; Sinha et al., 2007; Cõte et al., 2011). In fact, Clb2 levels are cell cycle-dependent, peaking during G2/M phase and decreasing before the mitotic exit. Clb2 is more abundant in the yeast form and the accumulation of Clb2 is delayed upon hyphal induction, suggesting that its expression is tightly regulated during morphogenesis (Bensen et al., 2005). While the disruption of CLB2 leads to cell cycle arrest in late anaphase, increasing cell elongation and the appearance of divided nuclei connected by long mitotic spindles, the overexpression of CLB2 reverts this phenotype reducing the extent of filamentous growth (Bensen et al., 2005). The CUG-residue 301 present at a Clb2 conserved site, is within the so-called cyclin box domain (Figures 6A,B), an interaction interface of about 100 residues containing five well-spaced conserved residues (RDLKF) (Nugent et al., 1991; Kobayashi et al., 1992) (Figure 6A, orange diamonds) and a structural motif of five α-helices, the “cyclin fold,” highly conserved from yeast to humans. C. albicans Cbl2 shares 39% amino acid sequence identity with human cyclin B1 (Table 1, Figure 6A), for which the experimental three-dimensional structure is known (Petri et al., 2007). C. albicans Clb2 CUG-residues (301 and 383) are structurally equivalent to amino acids Glu265 and Gly347 in human cyclin B1 (Figure 6A red stars, Figure 6B red spheres). In particular, cyclin B1 Glu265 (invariant serine in all yeast homologs, Figure 6A) is exposed and in a loop between two α-helices within the conserved cyclin box (Figure 6B, blue cartoon) where the interaction with the activating kinase, CDK, occurs.
Figure 6
CDKs are proline-directed kinases that phosphorylate serines or threonines for the control of cell cycle progression. In most eukaryotes, activation of CDKs is mediated by transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms (Duronio and Xiong, 2013), such as the phosphorylation of a threonine residue, present at a T-loop of CDKs structurally close to the PSTAIRE motif interaction region (Figures 6C,D red stars) that opens the protein substrate binding region and favors the contact/interaction between the PSTAIRE motif of CDKs and the cyclin box region from cyclins (Hanks and Hunter, 1995; Kaldis, 1999; Ross et al., 2000; Brown et al., 2007) (Figure 6C). In C. albicans, the best studied CDK is Cdc28 due to its central role in the coordination of yeast cell cytokinesis, cycle progression (Murray, 2004) and cycle-related morphogenesis (Umeyama et al., 2006). Repression of CDC28 affects the expression of transcription factors that regulate morphogenesis, namely through the control of the expression levels of EFG1, NRG1, RBF1, RIM101, FKH2, and TEC1, leading to highly polarized filamentous growth of C. albicans cells (Umeyama et al., 2006). Cdc28 displays high sequence similarity to human Cdk2 (66% identity) (Table 1, Figure 6D), particularly within the cyclin interacting PSTAIRE region (Figure 6D, red stars). Therefore, the presence of a larger aliphatic leucine at position 301 in Clb2 may affect the interaction of Clb2 with Cdc28 suggesting a role for ambiguity in the regulation of protein–protein interactions required for cyclin binding and CDK activation.
Altogether, these observations strongly suggest a role for CUG ambiguity in the control of the stability/strength of this crucial cyclin-CDK complex, whose association is essential for Cdc28 activation. Consequently, CUG-residue identity may influence the function of the cyclin-CDK complex in the control of cell cycle and morphogenesis, ultimately affecting C. albicans cellular homeostasis and pathogenesis.
Conclusion
Throughout evolution, different species developed divergent strategies to adapt to the constantly changing environmental conditions. In particular, yeast of the CTG-clade species underwent a unique sense-to-sense codon reassignment: the CUG codon is ambiguously translated both as serine and leucine, leading to proteome diversity (Santos et al., 1996; Tuite and Santos, 1996). Interestingly, under physiological conditions most of the CUG codons are translated as serine and specific stimuli lead to increased leucine incorporation (Bezerra et al., 2013). The increase of CUG ambiguity induces phenotypical alterations in CTG-clade species, such as morphological changes, widely correlated with fungal virulence (Roman et al., 2007). However, at the molecular level little is known about the impact of CUG ambiguity in the structure/function of the affected proteins and its relevance for the observed phenotypical changes. Although the genome in these species has evolved to tolerate genetic code ambiguity and moderate fluctuations in the insertion of serine or leucine at CUG positions, some proteins involved in key signal transduction pathways are likely to be functionally affected by the identity of the CUG-residue. The structural analysis here presented reveals that increased insertion of leucine at CUG sites in key proteins such as Ras1, Cek1, and Cbl2, are not expected to affect overall protein structure dramatically. Instead, it is likely that CUG ambiguity interferes with protein function, particularly with the assembly and stability of macromolecular complexes crucial for the regulation of essential cellular processes. The fine modulation of the activity of a number of selected C. albicans proteins, mediated by CUG ambiguity, may be an effective evolutionary strategy to adapt to different hostile environments.
The structural analysis of this small sample of key regulatory proteins suggests that the incorporation of a small polar serine or a longer aliphatic leucine at the CUG position might have an effect on the protein interfaces and modulate protein-protein interaction dynamics. Therefore, a role for CUG ambiguity in the regulation of C. albicans morphogenesis/pathogenesis is suggested and should be further explored, at the molecular level, as an important virulence regulatory process and a target for new therapeutic strategies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Acknowledgments
The authors are funded by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and by EU-FEDER funding through the Operational Competitiveness Programme—COMPETE (grant FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028024 [PTDC/BBB-BEP/0695/2012]) and through Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2 - O Novo Norte), under Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional—QREN (grants NORTE-07-0124-000001—Neurodegenerative Diseases and NORTE-07-0124-000002 - Host-Pathogen Interactions). The financial support of FCT through fellowship SFRH/BPD/63465/2009 (Zsuzsa Sárkány) is also acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Alonso-MongeR.Navarro-GarciaF.MoleroG.Diez-OrejasR.GustinM.PlaJ.et al. (1999). Role of the mitogen-activated protein kinase Hog1p in morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 181, 3058–3068.
2
ArnerE. S. J. (2010). Selenoproteins-What unique properties can arise with selenocysteine in place of cysteine?Exp. Cell. Res. 316, 1296–1303. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.032
3
ArnoldK.BordoliL.KoppJ.SchwedeT. (2006). The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics22, 195–201. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770
4
BenkertP.KunzliM.SchwedeT. (2009). QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 510–514. 10.1093/nar/gkp322
5
BenkertP.TosattoS. C.SchomburgD. (2008). QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins71, 261–277. 10.1002/prot.21715
6
BensenE. S.Clemente-BlancoA.FinleyK. R.Correa-BordesJ.BermanJ. (2005). The mitotic cyclins Clb2p and Clb4p affect morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell16, 3387–3400. 10.1091/mbc.E04-12-1081
7
BezerraA. R.SimoesJ.LeeW.RungJ.WeilT.GutI. G.et al. (2013). Reversion of a fungal genetic code alteration links proteome instability with genomic and phenotypic diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 11079–11084. 10.1073/pnas.1302094110
8
BlankenshipJ. R.MitchellA. P. (2006). How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9, 588–594. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.003
9
BockA.ForchhammerK.HeiderJ.LeinfelderW.SawersG.VeprekB.et al. (1991). Selenocysteine: the 21st amino acid. Mol. Microbiol. 5, 515–520. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00722.x
10
BockA.StadtmanT. C. (1988). Selenocysteine, a highly specific component of certain enzymes, is incorporated by a UGA-directed co-translational mechanism. Biofactors1, 245–250.
11
BoguskiM. S.MccormickF. (1993). Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature366, 643–654. 10.1038/366643a0
12
BondC. S.SchuttelkopfA. W. (2009). ALINE: a WYSIWYG protein-sequence alignment editor for publication-quality alignments. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 65, 510–512. 10.1107/S0907444909007835
13
Boriack-SjodinP. A.MargaritS. M.Bar-SagiD.KuriyanJ. (1998). The structural basis of the activation of Ras by Sos. Nature394, 337–343. 10.1038/28548
14
BourneH. R.SandersD. A.MccormickF. (1991). The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature349, 117–127. 10.1038/349117a0
15
BrownN. R.LoweE. D.PetriE.SkamnakiV.AntrobusR.JohnsonL. N. (2007). Cyclin B and cyclin A confer different substrate recognition properties on CDK2. Cell Cycle6, 1350–1359. 10.4161/cc.6.11.4278
16
BuhrmanG.HolzapfelG.FeticsS.MattosC. (2010). Allosteric modulation of Ras positions Q61 for a direct role in catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 4931–4936. 10.1073/pnas.0912226107
17
BuhrmanG.WinkG.MattosC. (2007). Transformation efficiency of RasQ61 mutants linked to structural features of the switch regions in the presence of Raf. Structure15, 1618–1629. 10.1016/j.str.2007.10.011
18
ButlerG.RasmussenM. D.LinM. F.SantosM. A. S.SakthikumarS.MunroC. A.et al. (2009). Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature459, 657–662. 10.1038/Nature08064
19
CampbellS. L.Khosravi-FarR.RossmanK. L.ClarkG. J.DerC. J. (1998). Increasing complexity of Ras signaling. Oncogene17, 1395–1413. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202174
20
ChatterjeeA.XiaoH.SchultzP. G. (2012). Evolution of multiple, mutually orthogonal prolyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 14841–14846. 10.1073/pnas.1212454109
21
CõteP.HoguesH.WhitewayM. (2009). Transcriptional analysis of the Candida albicans cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell20, 3363–3373. 10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0210
22
CõteP.SuleaT.DignardD.WuC.WhitewayM. (2011). Evolutionary reshaping of fungal mating pathway scaffold proteins. mBio2, e00230–e00210. 10.1128/mBio.00230-10
23
CrickF. H. C. (1968). The origin of the genetic code. J. Mol. Biol. 38, 367–379. 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90392-6
24
CsankC.SchroppelK.LebererE.HarcusD.MohamedO.MelocheS.et al. (1998). Roles of the Candida albicans mitogen-activated protein kinase homolog, Cek1p, in hyphal development and systemic candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 66, 2713–2721.
25
DouglasL. J. (2002). Medical importance of biofilms in Candida infections. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 19, 139–143.
26
DouglasL. J. (2003). Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol. 11, 30–36. 10.1016/S0966-842X(02)00002-1
27
DuronioR. J.XiongY. (2013). Signaling pathways that control cell proliferation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5:a008904. 10.1101/cshperspect.a008904
28
FeketovaZ.MasekT.VopalenskyV.PospisekM. (2010). Ambiguous decoding of the CUG codon alters the functionality of the Candida albicans translation initiation factor 4E. FEMS Yeast Res. 10, 558–569. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00629.x
29
FengQ.SummersE.GuoB.FinkG. (1999). Ras signaling is required for serum-induced hyphal differentiation in Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 181, 6339–6346.
30
Galán-DíezM.AranaD. M.Serrano-GomezD.KremerL.CasasnovasJ. M.OrtegaM.et al. (2010). Candida albicans beta-glucan exposure is controlled by the fungal CEK1-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that modulates immune responses triggered through dectin-1. Infect. Immun. 78, 1426–1436. 10.1128/IAI.00989-09
31
GiacomettiR.KronbergF.BiondiR. M.HernandezA. I.PasseronS. (2012). Cross regulation between Candida albicans catalytic and regulatory subunits of protein kinase A. Fungal Genet. Biol. 49, 74–85. 10.1016/j.fgb.2011.12.001
32
GomesA. C.MirandaI.SilvaR. M.MouraG. R.ThomasB.AkoulitchevA.et al. (2007). A genetic code alteration generates a proteome of high diversity in the human pathogen Candida albicans. Genome Biol. 8:R206. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r206
33
GoodM.TangG.SingletonJ.ReményiA.LimW. A. (2009). The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell20, 1085–1097. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.049
34
GowN. A.Van De VeerdonkF. L.BrownA. J.NeteaM. G. (2012). Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 112–122. 10.1038/nrmicro2711
35
GuhadF. A.JensenH. E.AalbaekB.CsankC.MohamedO.HarcusD.et al. (1998). Mitogen-activated protein kinase-defective Candida albicans is avirulent in a novel model of localized murine candidiasis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166, 135–139. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13194.x
36
HanksS. K.HunterT. (1995). Protein kinases 6. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 9, 576–596.
37
HerringS.AmbrogellyA.PolycarpoC. R.SollD. (2007). Recognition of pyrrolysine tRNA by the Desulfitobacterium hafniense pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 1270–1278. 10.1093/Nar/Gkl1151
38
HoganD. A.SundstromP. (2009). The Ras/cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and virulence in Candida albicans. Future Microbiol. 4, 1263–1270. 10.2217/fmb.09.106
39
HuangG.SrikanthaT.SahniN.YiS.SollD. R. (2009). CO(2) regulates white-to-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Curr. Biol. 19, 330–334. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.018
40
KaldisP. (1999). The cdk-activating kinase (CAK): from yeast to mammals. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55, 284–296. 10.1007/s000180050290
41
KnightR. D.FreelandS. J.LandweberL. F. (2001). Rewiring the keyboard evolvability of the genetic code. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 49–58. 10.1038/35047500
42
KobayashiH.StewartE.PoonR.AdamczewskiJ. P.GannonJ.HuntT. (1992). Identification of the domains in cyclin A required for binding to, and activation of, p34cdc2 and p32cdk2 protein kinase subunits. Mol. Biol. Cell3, 1279–1294. 10.1091/mbc.3.11.1279
43
KumamotoC. A.VincesM. D. (2005). Contributions of hyphae and hypha-co-regulated genes to Candida albicans virulence. Cell. Microbiol. 7, 1546–1554. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00616.x
44
LebererE.HarcusD.DignardD.JohnsonL.UshinskyS.ThomasD. Y.et al. (2001). Ras links cellular morphogenesis to virulence by regulation of the MAP kinase and cAMP signalling pathways in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 42, 673–687. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02672.x
45
LebererE.ZiegelbauerK.SchmidtA.HarcusD.DignardD.AshJ.et al. (1997). Virulence and hyphal formation of Candida albicans require the Ste20p-like protein kinase CaCla4p. Curr. Biol. 7, 539–546. 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00252-1
46
LewD. J.ReedS. I. (1993). Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins. J. Cell. Biol. 120, 1305–1320. 10.1083/jcb.120.6.1305
47
LiD.WilliamsD.LowmanD.MonteiroM. A.TanX.KruppaM.et al. (2009). The Candida albicans histidine kinase Chk1p: signaling and cell wall mannan. Fungal Genet. Biol. 46, 731–741. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.06.008
48
LoebJ. D.Sepulveda-BecerraM.HazanI.LiuH. (1999). A G1 cyclin is necessary for maintenance of filamentous growth in Candida albicans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4019–4027.
49
MeyerF.SchmidtH. J.PlumperE.HasilikA.MersmannG.MeyerH. E.et al. (1991). UGA is translated as cysteine in pheromone 3 of Euplotes Octocarinatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 3758–3761. 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3758
50
MirandaI.SilvaR.SantosM. A. S. (2006). Evolution of the genetic code in yeasts. Yeast23, 203–213. 10.1002/Yea.1350
51
MirandaI.Silva-DiasA.RochaR.Teixeira-SantosR.CoelhoC.GoncalvesT.RodriguesA.G.et al. (2013). Candida albicans CUG mistranslation is a mechanism to create cell surface variation. mBio4, e00285–e00213. 10.1128/mBio.00285-13
52
MixH.LobanovA. V.GladyshevV. N. (2007). SECIS elements in the coding regions of selenoprotein transcripts are functional in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 414–423. 10.1093/nar/gkl1060
53
MurrayA. W. (2004). Recycling the cell cycle: cyclins revisited. Cell116, 221–234. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01080-8
54
NobileC. J.FoxE. P.NettJ. E.SorrellsT. R.MitrovichQ. M.HerndayA. D.et al. (2012). A recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development in Candida albicans. Cell148, 126–138. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.048
55
NobleS. M.FrenchS.KohnL. A.ChenV.JohnsonA. D. (2010). Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat. Genet. 42, 590–598. 10.1038/ng.605
56
NugentJ. H.AlfaC. E.YoungT.HyamsJ. S. (1991). Conserved structural motifs in cyclins identified by sequence analysis. J. Cell. Sci. 99, 669–674.
57
OddsF. C.GowN. A.BrownA. J. (2001). Fungal virulence studies come of age. Genome Biol. 2:reviews1009. 10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-reviews1009
58
OhamaT.SuzukiT.MoriM.OsawaS.UedaT.WatanabeK.et al. (1993). Non-universal decoding of the leucine codon CUG in several Candida species. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4039–4045. 10.1093/nar/21.17.4039
59
PaiE. F.KrengelU.PetskoG. A.GoodyR. S.KabschW.WittinghoferA. (1990). Refined crystal-structure of the triphosphate conformation of H-ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 9, 2351–2359.
60
PaponN.CourdavaultV.ClastreM.BennettR. J. (2013). Emerging and emerged pathogenic Candida species: beyond the Candida albicans paradigm. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003550. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003550
61
PetriE. T.ErricoA.EscobedoL.HuntT.BasavappaR. (2007). The crystal structure of human cyclin B. Cell Cycle6, 1342–1349. 10.4161/cc.6.11.4297
62
PouplanaL. R.SantosM. A.ZhuJ. H.FarabaughP. J.JavidB. (2014). Protein mistranslation: friend or foe?Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 355–362. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.06.002
63
RemenyiA.GoodM. C.BhattacharyyaR. P.LimW. A. (2005). The role of docking interactions in mediating signaling input, output, and discrimination in the yeast MAPK network. Mol. Cell20, 951–962. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.030
64
RochaR.PereiraP. J.SantosM. A.Macedo-RibeiroS. (2011). Unveiling the structural basis for translational ambiguity tolerance in a human fungal pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14091–14096. 10.1073/pnas.1102835108
65
RomanE.AranaD. M.NombelaC.Alonso-MongeR.PlaJ. (2007). MAP kinase pathways as regulators of fungal virulence. Trends Microbiol. 15, 181–190. 10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.001
66
RomaniL.BistoniF.PuccettiP. (2003). Adaptation of Candida albicans to the host environment: the role of morphogenesis in virulence and survival in mammalian hosts. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6, 338–343. 10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00081-X
67
RossK. E.KaldisP.SolomonM. J. (2000). Activating phosphorylation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cyclin-dependent kinase, cdc28p, precedes cyclin binding. Mol. Biol. Cell11, 1597–1609. 10.1091/mbc.11.5.1597
68
San-BlasG.TravassosL. R.FriesB. C.GoldmanD. L.CasadevallA.CarmonaA. K.et al. (2000). Fungal morphogenesis and virulence. Med. Mycol. 38(Suppl. 1), 79–86. 10.1080/mmy.38.s1.79.86
69
SantosM. A.GomesA. C.SantosM. C.CarretoL. C.MouraG. R. (2011). The genetic code of the fungal CTG clade. C. R. Biol. 334, 607–611. 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.008
70
SantosM. A.KeithG.TuiteM. F. (1993). Non-standard translational events in Candida albicans mediated by an unusual seryl-tRNA with a 5'-CAG-3' (leucine) anticodon. EMBO J. 12, 607–616.
71
SantosM. A.PerreauV. M.TuiteM. F. (1996). Transfer RNA structural change is a key element in the reassignment of the CUG codon in Candida albicans. EMBO J. 15, 5060–5068.
72
SantosM. A.UedaT.WatanabeK.TuiteM. F. (1997). The non-standard genetic code of Candida spp.: an evolving genetic code or a novel mechanism for adaptation?Mol. Microbiol. 26, 423–431. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5891961.x
73
ScheffzekK.AhmadianM. R.KabschW.WiesmullerL.LautweinA.SchmitzF.et al. (1997). The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. Science277, 333–338. 10.1126/science.277.5324.333
74
ShapiroR. S.RobbinsN.CowenL. E. (2011). Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 213–267. 10.1128/MMBR.00045-10
75
SinhaI.WangY. M.PhilpR.LiC. R.YapW. H.WangY. (2007). Cyclin-dependent kinases control septin phosphorylation in Candida albicans hyphal development. Dev. Cell13, 421–432. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.011
76
SrinivasanG.JamesC. M.KrzyckiJ. A. (2002). Pyrrolysine encoded by UAG in Archaea: charging of a UAG-decoding specialized tRNA. Science296, 1459–1462. 10.1126/science.1069588
77
StynenB.Van DijckP.TournuH. (2010). A CUG codon adapted two-hybrid system for the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e184. 10.1093/nar/gkq725
78
SudberyP. E. (2011). Growth of Candida albicans hyphae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 737–748. 10.1038/nrmicro2636
79
SuzukiT.UedaT.WatanabeK. (1997). The 'polysemous' codon–a codon with multiple amino acid assignment caused by dual specificity of tRNA identity. EMBO J. 16, 1122–1134. 10.1093/emboj/16.5.1122
80
TongL.DevosA. M.MilburnM. V.KimS. H. (1991). Crystal-Structures at 2.2 A resolution of the catalytic domains of normal Ras protein and an oncogenic mutant complexed with GDP. J. Mol. Biol. 217, 503–516. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90753-S
81
TourancheauA. B.TsaoN.KlobutcherL. A.PearlmanR. E.AdoutteA. (1995). Genetic-code deviations in the ciliates: evidence for multiple and independent events. EMBO J. 14, 3262–3267.
82
TuiteM. F.CoxB. S. (2007). The genetic control of the formation and propagation of the [PSI+] prion of yeast. Prion1, 101–109. 10.4161/pri.1.2.4665
83
TuiteM. F.SantosM. A. (1996). Codon reassignment in Candida species: an evolutionary conundrum. Biochimie78, 993–999. 10.1016/S0300-9084(97)86722-3
84
UmeyamaT.KanekoA.NiimiM.UeharaY. (2006). Repression of CDC28 reduces the expression of the morphology-related transcription factors, Efg1p, Nrg1p, Rbf1p, Rim101p, Fkh2p and Tec1p and induces cell elongation in Candida albicans. Yeast23, 537–552. 10.1002/yea.1373
85
YamaoF.MutoA.KawauchiY.IwamiM.IwagamiS.AzumiY.et al. (1985). UGA is read as tryptophan in Mycoplasma capricolum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 2306–2309. 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2306
86
YiS.SahniN.DanielsK. J.LuK. L.HuangG.GarnaasA. M.et al. (2011). Utilization of the mating scaffold protein in the evolution of a new signal transduction pathway for biofilm development. MBio2, e00237–e00210. 10.1128/mBio.00237-10
87
YokoboriS.SuzukiT.WatanabeK. (2001). Genetic code variations in mitochondria: tRNA as a major determinant of genetic code plasticity. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 314–326. 10.1007/s002390010221
88
ZalatanJ. G.CoyleS. M.RajanS.SidhuS. S.LimW. A. (2012). Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science337, 1218–1222. 10.1126/science.1220683
89
ZhangY.GladyshevV. N. (2007). High content of proteins containing 21st and 22nd amino acids, selenocysteine and pyrrolysine, in a symbiotic deltaproteobacterium of gutless worm Olavius algarvensis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 4952–4963. 10.1093/Nar/Gkm514
90
ZhouX.-L.FangZ.-P.RuanZ.-R.WangM.LiuR.-J.TanM.et al. (2013). Aminoacylation and translational quality control strategy employed by leucyl-tRNA synthetase from a human pathogen with genetic code ambiguity. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9825–9838. 10.1093/nar/gkt741
91
ZhuY.FangH. M.WangY. M.ZengG. S.ZhengX. D.WangY. (2009). Ras1 and Ras2 play antagonistic roles in regulating cellular cAMP level, stationary-phase entry and stress response in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 74, 862–875. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06898.x
Summary
Keywords
CTG-clade, genetic code, cell signaling, MAPK pathway, cAMP-dependent pathway, morphogenesis
Citation
Sárkány Z, Silva A, Pereira PJB and Macedo-Ribeiro S (2014) Ser or Leu: structural snapshots of mistranslation in Candida albicans. Front. Mol. Biosci. 1:27. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2014.00027
Received
14 November 2014
Accepted
04 December 2014
Published
19 December 2014
Volume
1 - 2014
Edited by
Luiz Pedro Sorio De Carvalho, Medical Research Council National Institute for Medical Research, UK
Reviewed by
Doriano Lamba, Istituto di Cristallografia - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Italy; Charley Christian Staats, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Copyright
© 2014 Sárkány, Silva, Pereira and Macedo-Ribeiro.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sandra Macedo-Ribeiro, Protein Crystallography Group, IBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal e-mail: sribeiro@ibmc.up.pt
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.
This article was submitted to Structural Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.