Abstract
While epithelial-fibroblast interactions are viewed as the primary drivers of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), evidence gleaned from animal modeling and human studies implicates innate immunity as well. To provide perspective on this topic, this review synthesizes the available data regarding the complex role of innate immunity in IPF. The role of substances present in the fibrotic microenvironment including pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) derived from invading or commensal microbes, and danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) derived from injured cells and tissues will be discussed along with the proposed contribution of innate immune populations such as macrophages, neutrophils, fibrocytes, myeloid suppressor cells, and innate lymphoid cells. Each component will be considered in the context of its relationship to environmental and genetic factors, disease outcomes, and potential therapies. We conclude with discussion of unanswered questions and opportunities for future study in this area.
Introduction
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and incurable condition defined by the radiographic and histopathologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in the absence of an identifiable cause or exposure (; ). With a 5 years survival rate of little more than 50%, it carries one of the worst prognosis of all interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) (). Numerous IPF risk factors have been identified including aging (), cigarette smoking (), chronic viral infections (), gastroesophageal reflux (), and genetic predisposition (), but the mechanisms through which these entities are related to the disease remain unknown. Thus, better understanding of fibrogenic processes affecting the lung remains a critical unmet need.
Parenchymal fibrosis is proposed to originate from prolonged or perpetuated alveolar epithelial injury (). This event stimulates an aberrant wound healing response characterized by myofibroblast expansion and the obliteration of lung tissue by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) (). A substantial body of evidence generated from preclinical studies and clinical trials forms the basis for the current consensus that IPF does not appear to be a direct result of immune cell dysfunction but rather, that immune and inflammatory cells can permit, promote, or suppress fibrotic responses in the lung stroma (Figure 1). This article reviews the evidence in support of this hypothesis.
FIGURE 1
Historical Perspective
The clinical features of IPF provide very limited insight into associated immune factors. Diagnostic criteria for IPF are essentially the presence of a pattern consistent with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia on chest imaging or lung biopsy in the absence of an identifiable cause. Compared to other ILDs, IPF lungs contains fewer inflammatory cells and chest imaging contains very little of the ground glass opacities that are typically reflective of inflammation (; ). Features of autoimmunity, such as physical exam findings and serology, as is clinical evidence of an identifiable antigen-driven immune response, are absent (). IPF outcomes are worsened by treatment with low dose Prednisone, Azathioprine (), and unaffected by treatment with biologics targeting interferon gamma () or TNFα (). These clinical observations have been interpreted by some sources as indicating the pathogenesis of IPF lacks an immune component (). However, this array of findings is unlikely to suggest that the immune system is not involved. On the contrary, the worsening of clinical outcomes by classical immunosuppression suggests, if anything, that certain immune responses might be protective and others might be harmful. Several studies demonstrate that anti-fibrotic and immunomodulatory macrophage functions are suppressed in IPF, and classical immunosuppression might aggravate the loss of anti-fibrotic immune cells (). Thus, better understanding of all forms of immunity has the potential to advance the understanding of IPF.
Innate vs Adaptive Immunity
Immune responses are dichotomized into innate and adaptive processes. The former component, which is the focus of this review, is currently understood as a rapid and programmed response to chemical or physical stimuli and the latter being a specific response to a particular antigen. While abnormalities in both components have been described in IPF, the available evidence suggests a pathogenic contribution of innate immunity whereas the role of adaptive immunity is less clear. Thus, this review will focus on the innate immune processes that could contribute to IPF.
Innate Immune Ligands in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns vs. Danger Associated Molecular Patterns
Fibrotic immunopathology has been reported in the context of pattern recognition receptor (PRR) activation. PRRs respond to the physical or chemical structure of their respective ligands to initiate and in some cases perpetuate host defense. PRR-activating structures derived from microorganisms are termed “pathogen associated molecular patterns,” or “PAMPs” and substances generated by tissue injury are called “danger associated molecular patterns,” or “DAMPs” (). Another type of PRR ligand, “homeostatic associated molecular patters,” or “HAMPs” has recently been described but has not yet been studied in IPF. It should be noted that while cells of the immune system and lung stroma contain functional PRRs, the focus of this review is restricted to professional immune cells involved in host defense (). Thus, PAMPs, DAMPS, and PRRs will only be discussed in these contexts.
Pathogen associated molecular patterns. While not viewed as an infectious process, several lines of evidence derived from animal and human studies support a connection between IPF and microbes. The contribution of viral and bacterial PAMPs has been explored as follows ().
Viruses. IPF has been linked to a number of viruses. Several studies have shown that the Herpes virus family member Epstein-Barr virus is enriched in IPF bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and lung tissues (; ), and may contribute to induction of TGFβ1 expression and epithelial acquisition of mesenchymal properties (). Likewise, Cytomegalovirus has been shown to exacerbate bleomycin induced fibrosis in mice through a mechanism involving canonical TGFβ1 activation and Vimentin expression (). A study in human lung epithelium revealed Herpesvirus saimiri infection promotes IL-17 production (). In line with these findings, antiviral therapy has shown modest benefit in animal models () and one small human study () but more widespread studies of efficacy and mechanism are currently lacking.
Bacteria. Data linking bacteria to IPF have also been described. One study of IPF BAL revealed an inverse relationship between bacterial load and clinical outcomes where detection of organisms such as Haemophilus, Streptococcus, Neisseria, and Veillonella were predictive of lung function decline (). A separate study found that IPF BAL was enriched for strains of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus (), with the latter species aligning with increased nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like (NOD) receptor signaling and poor outcomes (). While the reasons for these observations remains unclear, the known association of IPF with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (), raises the possibility of chronic microaspiration as an inoculation source. Thus, the microbiome is emerging as a new area of study in IPF and has led to studies examining antibiotics as a novel treatment approach ().
Danger Associated Molecular Patterns Substances generated by tissue injury can function as danger associated molecular patterns, or “DAMPs.” Normal tissue turnover generates low levels of DAMPs which support homeostasis through the removal of debris, resolution of injury, and completion of repair (). DAMP overabundance, however, appears to favor a microenvironment characterized by PRR activation and inflammation () that may emulate or differ from responses caused by PAMPs (). PRR ligands generated by homeostatic mechanisms (homeostatic associated molecular patters, HAMPs) have also been described () but have not yet been studied in IPF.
Numerous substances can function as DAMPs. The easiest to conceptualize may be cellular components such as nucleic acid and organelles that are passively generated by the necroptotic lysis of dying/dead cells or actively released via exocytosis of membrane bound vesicles or endosomes. DAMPs are also generated by the cleavage of extracellular proteins into fragments that can act as signaling molecules. The PRRs that recognize DAMPs are, for the most part, also activated by PAMPs () and in the setting of pulmonary fibrosis can be protective or pathogenic depending on the context. For example, absence of the dsRNA sensor toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) worsens bleomycin induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice and humans possessing the Leu412 Phe polymorphism in the TLR3 gene develop a rapidly progressive form of IPF (). TLR4 deficiency worsens, and TLR4 agonists improve, bleomycin induced fibrosis in mice via at least two mechanisms: augmentation of lung progenitor cell renewal () and modulation of TGFβ1 and IL-17 production (). The role of TLR4 appears to be complex as its inhibition can also be protective (; ). A connection to IPF is suggested by the finding that endogenous TLR4 ligands such as high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) (; ), tenascin-C (; ; ), S100 protein () and hyaluronan fragments () are enriched in IPF BAL and lung tissues (). Additional evidence linking TLR4 to IPF is the discovery mutations in the TLR2/4 adaptor protein Toll interacting protein (TOLLIP) increases disease susceptibility (), though the mechanism of this association remains unknown. Intriguingly, N-acetylcysteine therapy is reported to be efficacious for individuals with IPF with an rs3750920 (TOLLIP) TT genotype (), therefore elucidating underlying biology of interaction between DAMPs and their receptors along with future clinical trials targeting these entities might lead to substantial clinical benefit.
The connection to innate immunity extends beyond Toll like receptors as shown by data implicating the NACHT, LLR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NALP3) inflammasome activation in IL-1β associated fibrosis in the bleomycin mouse model (; ). Recent work links this process to the mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) pathway in mice and humans with IPF (). The inflammation may also be activated via toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) () which along with its endogenous ligand mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is increased in IPF (). In fact, previously normal lung fibroblasts stimulated with TLR9 agonists develop features of myofibroblasts (; ) and excessive concentrations of circulating mtDNA is predictive of poor outcomes in several IPF cohorts (; ). The inflammatory nature of the bleomycin model has made this biology difficult to understand (), heightening the need for experimental systems that are more reflective of the healthy and diseased human lung. Finally, abnormal responses to DAMP recognition have been described as one form of immunosenescence () and it is intriguing to consider this concept in relationship to the telomerase mutations that are associated with the IPF disease state. Thus, the connection of PAMPs, DAMPs, and PRRs in IPF is an area warranting further studies.
Innate Immune Cells
As the first line of defense against invading pathogens, cells of the innate immune system have important roles in host defense and tissue homeostasis. The best studied cells in the context of IPF are macrophages and neutrophils, though more recently described populations such as fibrocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), may also be involved. It is worth noting that stromal populations such as fibroblasts and epithelium also demonstrate innate immune functions () but because these cells are not professional immune cells, their at best speculative contribution to IPF immune dysfunction will not be discussed herein.
Macrophages are both the major antimicrobial phagocytes in the lungs and central mediators of fibrotic lung disease (). Macrophages can regulate both injury and repair in various models of fibrosis and macrophage driven processes have been important areas of study in IPF for more than 50 years (; ). Older paradigms proposed dichotomized phenotypic categories of classically activated macrophages, or “M1s” generated by INFγ and TNFα exposure as being antifibrotic, and alternatively activated macrophages or “M2s” generated by IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and TGFβ1 stimulation as being profibrotic (; ). However, as macrophage classification schemes have become increasingly nonbinary, the M1/M2 dichotomy may be grossly oversimplified () yet conceptually useful when describing the functional characteristics of these adaptable cells. Specifically, in this context, a moderate excess of M1-like macrophages suppresses fibroblast activation and ECM accumulation, while a large excess may cause epithelial cell death and diffuse alveolar damage similar to that occurring in acute exacerbations of IPF. Similarly, a controlled balance of M2 macrophages stimulates appropriate repair and regeneration while an excess of M2 macrophages drives the lung towards progressive and inexorable fibrosis (). Animal modeling of IPF reveals that the plasticity and diversity of lung macrophages involves contributions from long lived, lung resident alveolar macrophages () and from populations of interstitial macrophages arriving from the bone marrow and circulation (). In humans, accumulating evidence suggests that an increase in circulating monocytes predicts poor outcomes, as one of the most validated cellular biomarkers in IPF () though it is currently unknown whether these findings relate to a primary hematopoietic defect or are simply undergoing appropriate recruitment to the injured and fibrotic lung. Either way, because monocytes presumably give rise to interstitial macrophages these observations could be used to develop cellular biomarkers reflective of pathogenesis and outcome. While differences in polarization markers precludes direct comparison of mouse and human macrophages, the preponderance of available evidence indicates that expression of scavenger receptors and profibrotic markers is a cross-species feature of many forms of lung fibrosis including IPF (; ; ) though again, why these cells are aberrantly polarized and whether they promote disease in humans remains unknown.
Macrophages are implicated in fibrotic processes via a large number of mechanisms, none of which involve direct production of extracellular matrix. Since the 1980s, alveolar macrophages from IPF patients have been known to modulate fibroblast activation via the production of mediators that have come to be associated with M2 activation. At the time that these studies were first performed, the concept of innate immunity had not yet been established and these observations were viewed as IPF being an inflammatory condition though this idea is being continuously refined and reimagined as the field evolves. More recent studies have shown that interstitial macrophages from mice and humans display fibrosis promoting properties (), as do circulating monocytes isolated from patients with IPF (). The latter finding is notable for demonstrating that monocytes are programmed to promote fibrosis before entering the lung. Mouse modeling has shown that removal (; ) or repolarizing () of lung macrophages can prevent and reverse experimentally induced mouse fibrosis. The repolarization hypothesis forms the basis for the use of the evolutionarily conserved pattern recognition protein pentraxin 2, which is under investigation as a novel therapeutic in several fibrotic diseases including IPF (; ).
These contributions are accompanied by additional mechanisms (), some of which include interactions with dead or dying cells (). For example, efferocytosis (engulfment of apoptotic cells) induces transcriptional activation of Tgfb1 in alveolar and interstitial macrophages () which is in line with a well-established literature implicating alveolar macrophages and/or LysM + cells as a source of TGFβ1 in humans () and mice (). The functions of apoptotic cell clearance and TGFβ1 production are augmented by production of cytokines (TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12) and chemokines such as CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL12, CCL5, CCL17, and CCL18 (). Through production of lipid mediators such as eicosanoids they might contribute to fibrosis (), though this function has yet to be confirmed in IPF tissues and experimental modeling (). Additional functions include ECM remodeling and matrix metalloproteinase production () as well as the ingestion and recycling of collagen (). While several studies indicate that macrophages might also contribute to pulmonary fibrosis by regulating epithelial cell activation (), this area remains largely unexplored in the context of IPF. Macrophages are also known to direct () and respond to the metabolic products of adjacent cells (; ) and because they recycle surfactant (), they may be involved in the poorly understood recycling association between surfactant protein mutations and IPF (). Macrophages regulate the expression of pro- and anti-fibrotic angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (), which may be relevant given the efficacy of therapies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2) in IPF (). Macrophages express neuronal guidance proteins such as Netrin-1 which appears to control a newly recognized form of adrenergic nerve associated fibrosis in mouse models and in patients with IPF (). Macrophages show a connection to epithelial regeneration through their production of WNT-containing exosomes () which may also be implicated in the poorly understood association between innate immune activation and lung progenitor cell survival (). Finally, macrophages both contribute to () and respond to altered mechanical properties in the fibrotic lung, suggesting an immunomechanical function (). The fibrosis promoting functions of lung macrophages are depicted in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
The compelling connection between macrophages and fibrosis has fostered the development of immune targeted therapies in IPF. To date, most clinical trials in this arena examining a specific mediator have failed to show a benefit of this strategy. Specifically, TNFα neutralization with Etanercept, which would be expected to suppress M1 activation, did not affect outcomes in a Phase III trial (). An approach targeting macrophage recruitment with a monoclonal antibody targeting chemokine C-C chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) was similarly unsuccessful (). Additionally, despite early promise, administration of recombinant interferon gamma was also abandoned due to lack of efficacy (). While disappointing in terms of efficacy, these studies were useful in revealing that inhibition of one specific macrophage mediator or function is insufficient in delaying disease progression. The multiple combined body of work suggests that successful targeting of macrophages may require a more pleiotropic approach activation state and might be more efficacious. This hypothesis forms the rationale for the recently initiated Phase III trial of recombinant Pentraxin 2, an acute phase reactant that interferes with innate immune activation by binding to debris and inhibiting Fcγ receptor driven inflammatory process in phagocytic cells ().
Neutrophils are another innate immune population which may impact IPF in several ways. Early studies of BAL neutrophilia identified in a subgroup of IPF patients experiencing reduced survival () and the neutrophil chemoattractant, CXCL8, is increased in IPF () suggesting an association between these entities. Additionally, BAL neutrophils are directly proportional to concentrations of an alveolar epithelial marker, cytokeratin 19, which further supports a connection in this regard (). While these studies are most easily interpreted as supporting fibrosis as a neutrophil driven process, an alternate explanation is that neutrophils are in fact protective and that their accumulation represent the host’s attempt at restoring homeostasis. This hypothesis would be supported by observations made in other modeling systems in which neutrophils were found to suppress alveolar injury through their transfer of miR223 containing extracellular vesicles (). However, because this function has not been shown in IPF, its relevance in this condition and related processes is at best uncertain.
Neutrophils also play an important role in ECM turnover. Specifically, the most well studied proteolytic product of alveolar neutrophils, neutrophil elastase (NE), is increased in IPF BAL (). The involvement of NE in the generation of DAMPs and ECM degradation (; ) suggests one function for this enzyme. Furthermore, NE itself may regulate fibroblast responses in a manner that does not involve ECM breakdown (). When viewed in this light, it is notable that mice deficient in NE are protected from fibrosis in several lung models (; ) and that the NE inhibitor, Sivelestat, dampens fibrosis in the bleomycin model (). Neutrophils also participate in by controlling the balance of TIMPs and MMPs (; ) such as the pro-fibrotic MMP-2, MMP-8, and MMP-9 (; ), though the relevance of these findings to human IPF remains unclear.
Finally, an additional fibrogenic neutrophil function is the formation of extracellular neutrophil traps. These highly inflammatory aggregates of chromatin and neutrophils regulate activation of immune cells () and fibroblasts (). Detection of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has been reported in the lungs of bleomycin exposed mice and in some forms of fibrotic ILD but not, as yet, in IPF (). Further studies are warranted to understand whether NETs play a role in IPF pathogenesis.
To summarize, neutrophils could participate in IPF through their production of soluble mediators, regulation of epithelial injury, control of ECM turnover, and formation of NETs. (Figure 2). However, because IPF lung tissue contains few neutrophils their role in this disease state remains unclear.
Fibrocytes are bone marrow-derived cells displaying characteristics of leukocytes, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and fibroblasts. Viewed as originating from monocytes, they are found in the systemic circulation from which they migrate to areas of tissue injury and participate in wound repair (). Fibrocytes are associated with conditions characterized by chronic inflammation and fibroblast-mediated tissue remodeling such as IPF () and related conditions affecting the lung () and other organs (). They can be identified through their multilineage features ranging from cell surface markers to the production of various extracellular matrix components (; ). Their mesenchymal properties are further reflected by their potential for differentiation into myofibroblasts with subsequent αSMA expression and involvement in wound healing (; ; ). Fibrocytes have also been shown to influence fibrosis progression in mouse models through mechanisms involving paracrine regulation of fibroblast proliferation and activation () and augmenting accumulation of WT-1 positive mesenchymal cells in severely fibrotic lung regions (). Immunomodulatory functions of fibrocytes include expression of chemokine receptors such as CCR3, CCR5, CCR7, and CXCR4 which likely participate in their migration to areas of tissue injury. Fibrocytes might also contribute to a pro-inflammatory microenvironment by producing soluble mediators such as cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α) and chemokines (MIP-1α, MIP-1β, MCP-1, IL-8, and GRO-α). They can also initiate adaptive immune responses by presenting antigens to T helper cells (; ; ; ). Although current technical challenges involving both detection and reproducibility limit their use in the clinical setting (), fibrocytes may serve as both therapeutic target and predictor of poor outcome (). Other areas of uncertainty include whether fibrocytes are a unique leukocyte population or are instead a subset of inflammatory monocytes characterized by collagen production (), and whether the increase in circulating fibrocytes reported in IPF and related conditions indicates specific expansion of these cells or merely reflects the monocytosis described earlier in this article. Given their functional association with fibrogenesis, the specific role of fibrocytes in IPF pathogenesis is an area of interest that would benefit from further investigation. The fibrosis promoting functions of fibrocytes are depicted in Figure 2.
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogenous population of myeloid origin first observed in cancer patients. Despite their reported heterogeneity, MDSCs share the common function of contributing to regulatory T cell (Treg) expansion and, subsequently, suppressing T cell activation and proliferation. Pathologically, there is an increasing evidence of MDSCs being involved in non-malignant inflammatory diseases including fibrotic disorders (; ; ). Specific to IPF, at least one study has shown that enrichment of monocytic MDSCs in the peripheral blood of IPF patients correlates with worsened lung function in those patients (). Along those lines, MDSCs have also been associated with severe pulmonary hypertension, a well-known complication of IPF, in the bleomycin mice model with attenuation of the diseased condition achieved through chemokine receptor inhibition reducing MDSC recruitment (). The vascular remodeling observed in this complication may not only be a byproduct of fibrotic disease but has also been suggested to play a role in the progression of fibrosis through the mediation of epithelial injury and repair (). The recruitment and involvement of MDSCs in the creation of a pro-fibrotic, immune dysregulated environment indicates that they may be a target of interest for therapies aiming to mitigate the development and progression of IPF and, as such, should be studied further in human IPF cohorts (Figure 2).
Innate Lymphoid Cells are recently identified lymphoid cell populations distinguished by their lack of recombination activating gene (RAG) and classical T or B cell receptors (). The lack of RAG and classical receptors implies that their immunomodulatory functions arise from their response to intrinsic innate immune stimuli rather than the specific epitope driven activation that characterizes most other lymphocytes. ILCs contain at least three subgroups: ILC1, including IFN-γ-producing natural killer cells (); ILC2, including a population of cells producing the Th2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-13; and ILC3s, including cells that produce IL-17 and IL-22 (). ILCs in the lung form an immune system network in the lung by interacting with epithelial cells, natural killer T cells and myeloid (). In the context of fibrosis, ILC2 respond to antigens and pathogens by releasing large quantities of IL-13 which makes them attractive targets in pulmonary fibrosis (). While ILCs have been identified in lungs of patients with IPF (), their disease contribution is at best nascent and would benefit from additional investigation. The potential role of ILCs in fibrosis is shown in Figure 2.
Synthesis and Summary
The connection between innate immunity and IPF continues to evolve and now encompasses a contribution from numerous processes and cell populations enacting competing and overlapping functions. The presence of these processes in fibrotic conditions affecting numerous organs frames innate immune dysfunction as a convergent molecular feature of divergent clinical states. The detection of these mediators in both diseased organs and the systemic circulation could represent a more significant hematologic contribution than previously believed. Conversely, it could represent the nonspecific and intrinsic nature of the response. When compared with epithelial cells and fibroblasts, whose proposed role in fibrosis is relatively well defined, the more heterogeneous contribution of innate immunity is nuanced and unlikely to respond to a single intervention which may make it challenging to target. Additional challenges include critical aspects of host defense and tissue homeostasis both in the lung and in distant organs. Because some of these limitations may be overcome by the relative ease of isolating immune cells and mediators from bronchoalveolar lavage and blood, innate immunity is an attractive area for the development of personalized therapies based on easily accessible biomarkers. Areas of particular interest and important questions in this context that would benefit from concerted efforts performed in large scale multicenter recruitment efforts, leveraging of existing datasets and registries, and the generation of improved modeling systems that more faithfully recapitulate the complex microenvironment of the fibrotic human lung and improve the understanding and treatment of IPF on a global scale are shown in Box 1. Better understanding of innate immunity will continue to shape our view of this disease and provide the potential for paradigm shifts in treatment and management.
Box 1 Unanswered questions Regarding the Innate Immune System in IPF
Is innate immunity protective or pathogenic in IPF?
Are PRRs that recognize DAMPs or PAMPs protective or pathogenic in the setting of pulmonary fibrosis?
Does the altered microbiome cause PAMP driven innate immune activation in IPF?
Does perpetuated microinjury cause DAMP driven innate immune activation in IPF and are therapies targeting DAMPs and their receptors efficacious in IPF?
Can immune events detected in the circulation be used to guide personalized therapies in IPF?
Do macrophages participate in pulmonary fibrosis via the regulation of epithelial cell activation?
Does production of lipid mediators in macrophages contribute to pulmonary fibrosis?
Can therapies targeting macrophage activation stabilize or restore lung function in patients with IPF?
Are NETS an important part of IPF pathogenesis?
Can fibrocytes be a therapeutic target or biomarker in IPF?
Do myeloid-derived suppressor cells or ILCs participate in IPF?
How do circulating myeloid cells, other than monocytes, contribute to the increased pool in the lung? Do they invade the lung and provide “transitory or permanent” populations in situ?
Statements
Author contributions
GI writing of manuscript. AL visualization. EH supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, and writing of manuscript.
Funding
GI is supported by T32 HL007778-25. EH is supported by R01HL109233, R01HL125850, R01HL152677, and Grants from the Gabriel and Alma Elias Research Fund and the Greenfield Foundation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
American Thoracic Society (2000). American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. International Consensus Statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.161 (2 Pt 1), 646–664. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.ats3-00
2
Arango DuqueG.DescoteauxA. (2014). Macrophage Cytokines: Involvement in Immunity and Infectious Diseases. Front. Immunol.5, 491. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00491
3
BandoJ. K.ColonnaM. (2016). Innate Lymphoid Cell Function in the Context of Adaptive Immunity. Nat. Immunol.17 (7), 783–789. 10.1038/ni.3484
4
BarrattS. L.FlowerV. A.PaulingJ. D.MillarA. B. (2018). VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) and Fibrotic Lung Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (5), 1269. 10.3390/ijms19051269
5
BaumgartnerK. B.SametJ. M.StidleyC. A.ColbyT. V.WaldronJ. A. (1997). Cigarette Smoking: a Risk Factor for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.155 (1), 242–248. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001319
6
BeehK. M.BeierJ.KornmannO.BuhlR. (2003). Sputum Matrix Metalloproteinase-9, Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloprotinease-1, and Their Molar Ratio in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Healthy Subjects. Respir. Med.97 (6), 634–639. 10.1053/rmed.2003.1493
7
BhattacharyyaS.WangW.Morales-NebredaL.FengG.WuM.ZhouX.et al (2016). Tenascin-C Drives Persistence of Organ Fibrosis. Nat. Commun.7, 11703. 10.1038/ncomms11703
8
BiswasS. K.MantovaniA. (2012). Orchestration of Metabolism by Macrophages. Cel Metab.15 (4), 432–437. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.11.013
9
BittermanP. B.WewersM. D.RennardS. I.AdelbergS.CrystalR. G. (1986). Modulation of Alveolar Macrophage-Driven Fibroblast Proliferation by Alternative Macrophage Mediators. J. Clin. Invest.77 (3), 700–708. 10.1172/jci112364
10
BlackwellT. S.TagerA. M.BorokZ.MooreB. B.SchwartzD. A.AnstromK. J.et al (2014). Future Directions in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Research. An NHLBI Workshop Report. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.189 (2), 214–222. 10.1164/rccm.201306-1141WS
11
BryantA. J.ShenoyV.FuC.MarekG.LorentsenK. J.HerzogE. L.et al (2018). Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells Are Necessary for Development of Pulmonary Hypertension. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol.58 (2), 170–180. 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0214oc
12
CareyW. A.TaylorG. D.DeanW. B.BristowJ. D. (2010). Tenascin-C Deficiency Attenuates TGF-β-Mediated Fibrosis Following Murine Lung Injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.299 (6), L785–L793. 10.1152/ajplung.00385.2009
13
CastanoA. P.LinS.-L.SurowyT.NowlinB. T.TurlapatiS. A.PatelT.et al (2009). Serum Amyloid P Inhibits Fibrosis through Fc R-Dependent Monocyte-Macrophage Regulation In Vivo. Sci. Transl. Med.1 (5), 5ra13. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000111
14
CastelinoF. V. (2012). Lipids and Eicosanoids in Fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.24 (6), 649–655. 10.1097/bor.0b013e328356d9f6
15
ChesneyJ.MetzC.StavitskyA. B.BacherM.BucalaR. (1998). Regulated Production of Type I Collagen and Inflammatory Cytokines by Peripheral Blood Fibrocytes. J. Immunol.160 (1), 419–425.
16
ChesneyJ.BacherM.BenderA.BucalaR. (1997). The Peripheral Blood Fibrocyte Is a Potent Antigen-Presenting Cell Capable of Priming Naive T Cells In Situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.94 (12), 6307–6312. 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6307
17
ChristmannR. B.Sampaio-BarrosP.StifanoG.BorgesC. L.de CarvalhoC. R.KairallaR.et al (2014). Association of Interferon- and Transforming Growth Factor β-Regulated Genes and Macrophage Activation with Systemic Sclerosis-Related Progressive Lung Fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol.66 (3), 714–725. 10.1002/art.38288
18
ChrysanthopoulouA.MitroulisI.ApostolidouE.ArelakiS.MikroulisD.KonstantinidisT.et al (2014). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote Differentiation and Function of Fibroblasts. J. Pathol.233 (3), 294–307. 10.1002/path.4359
19
ChuaF.DunsmoreS. E.ClingenP. H.MutsaersS. E.ShapiroS. D.SegalA. W.et al (2007). Mice Lacking Neutrophil Elastase Are Resistant to Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol.170 (1), 65–74. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060352
20
CorbelM.Caulet-MaugendreS.GermainN. l.MoletS.LagenteV.BoichotE. (2001). Inhibition of Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice by the Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Batimastat. J. Pathol.193 (4), 538–545. 10.1002/path.826
21
EganJ. J.AdamaliH. I.LokS. S.StewartJ. P.WoodcockA. A. (2011). Ganciclovir Antiviral Therapy in Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: an Open Pilot Study. Pulm. Med.2011, 240805. 10.1155/2011/240805
22
EllsonC. D.DunmoreR.HogaboamC. M.SleemanM. A.MurrayL. A. (2014). Danger-associated Molecular Patterns and Danger Signals in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol.51 (2), 163–168. 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0366TR
23
EnomotoT.UsukiJ.AzumaA.NakagawaT.KudohS. (2003). Diabetes Mellitus May Increase Risk for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosisa. Chest123 (6), 2007–2011. 10.1378/chest.123.6.2007
24
EtichJ.KochM.WagenerR.ZauckeF.FabriM.BrachvogelB. (2019). Gene Expression Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix Signature in Macrophages of Different Activation Status: Relevance for Skin Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (20), 5086. 10.3390/ijms20205086
25
FanX.LiangH. P. (2010). Circulating Fibrocytes: a Potent Cell Population in Antigen-Presenting and Wound Healing. Chin. J. Traumatol.13 (2), 111–116.
26
FernandezI. E.EickelbergO. (2012). New Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Lung Injury and Fibrosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lancet380 (9842), 680–688. 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61144-1
27
FernandezI. E.GreiffoF. R.FrankenbergerM.BandresJ.HeinzelmannK.NeurohrC.et al (2016). Peripheral Blood Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Reflect Disease Status in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.48 (4), 1171–1183. 10.1183/13993003.01826-2015
28
FolcikV. A.GarofaloM.ColemanJ.DoneganJ. J.RabbaniE.SusterS.et al (2014). Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Strongly Associated with Productive Infection by Herpesvirus saimiri. Mod. Pathol.27 (6), 851–862. 10.1038/modpathol.2013.198
29
Freire-de-LimaC. G.XiaoY. Q.GardaiS. J.BrattonD. L.SchiemannW. P.HensonP. M. (2006). Apoptotic Cells, through Transforming Growth Factor-β, Coordinately Induce Anti-inflammatory and Suppress Pro-inflammatory Eicosanoid and NO Synthesis in Murine Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem.281 (50), 38376–38384. 10.1074/jbc.m605146200
30
GabrilovichD. I.NagarajS. (2009). Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells as Regulators of the Immune System. Nat. Rev. Immunol.9 (3), 162–174. 10.1038/nri2506
31
GaoR.PengX.PerryC.SunH.NtokouA.RyuC.et al (2021). Macrophage-derived Netrin-1 Drives Adrenergic Nerve-Associated Lung Fibrosis. J. Clin. Invest.131 (1), e136542. 10.1172/jci136542
32
GasseP.RiteauN.CharronS.GirreS.FickL.PétrilliV.et al (2009). Uric Acid Is a Danger Signal Activating NALP3 Inflammasome in Lung Injury Inflammation and Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.179 (10), 903–913. 10.1164/rccm.200808-1274oc
33
GibbonsM. A.MacKinnonA. C.RamachandranP.DhaliwalK.DuffinR.Phythian-AdamsA. T.et al (2011). Ly6ChiMonocytes Direct Alternatively Activated Profibrotic Macrophage Regulation of Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.184 (5), 569–581. 10.1164/rccm.201010-1719oc
34
GompertsB. N.StrieterR. M. (2007). Fibrocytes in Lung Disease. J. Leukoc. Biol.82 (3), 449–456. 10.1189/jlb.0906587
35
GordonS.PlüddemannA.Martinez EstradaF. (2014). Macrophage Heterogeneity in Tissues: Phenotypic Diversity and Functions. Immunol. Rev.262 (1), 36–55. 10.1111/imr.12223
36
GregoryA. D.KlimentC. R.MetzH. E.KimK.-H.KarglJ.AgostiniB. A.et al (2015). Neutrophil Elastase Promotes Myofibroblast Differentiation in Lung Fibrosis. J. Leukoc. Biol.98 (2), 143–152. 10.1189/jlb.3hi1014-493r
37
GriffithsK.HabielD. M.JaffarJ.BinderU.DarbyW. G.HoskingC. G.et al (2018). Anti-fibrotic Effects of CXCR4-Targeting I-Body AD-114 in Preclinical Models of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sci. Rep.8 (1), 3212. 10.1038/s41598-018-20811-5
38
HanM. K.ZhouY.MurrayS.TayobN.NothI.LamaV. N.et al (2014). Lung Microbiome and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: an Analysis of the COMET Study. Lancet Respir. Med.2 (7), 548–556. 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70069-4
39
HeZ.ZhuY.JiangH. (2009). Inhibiting Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling Ameliorates Pulmonary Fibrosis during Acute Lung Injury Induced by Lipopolysaccharide: an Experimental Study. Respir. Res.10, 126. 10.1186/1465-9921-10-126
40
HedstromL. (2002). Serine Protease Mechanism and Specificity. Chem. Rev.102 (12), 4501–4524. 10.1021/cr000033x
41
HenryM. T.McMahonK.MackarelA. J.PrikkK.SorsaT.MaisiP.et al (2002). Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 in Sarcoidosis and IPF. Eur. Respir. J.20 (5), 1220–1227. 10.1183/09031936.02.00022302
42
HerzogE. L.BucalaR. (2010). Fibrocytes in Health and Disease. Exp. Hematol.38 (7), 548–556. 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.03.004
43
HodgsonU.LaitinenT.TukiainenP. (2002). Nationwide Prevalence of Sporadic and Familial Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence of Founder Effect Among Multiplex Families in Finland. Thorax57 (4), 338–342. 10.1136/thorax.57.4.338
44
HongK. M.BelperioJ. A.KeaneM. P.BurdickM. D.StrieterR. M. (2007). Differentiation of Human Circulating Fibrocytes as Mediated by Transforming Growth Factor-β and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ. J. Biol. Chem.282 (31), 22910–22920. 10.1074/jbc.m703597200
45
HuX.DeBiasiE. M.HerzogE. L. (2015). Flow Cytometric Identification of Fibrocytes in the Human Circulation. Methods Mol. Biol.1343, 19–33. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2963-4_3
46
HuangJ.XieY.SunX.ZehH. J.3rdKangR.LotzeM. T.et al (2015). DAMPs, Ageing, and Cancer: The 'DAMP Hypothesis'. Ageing Res. Rev.24 (Pt A), 3–16. 10.1016/j.arr.2014.10.004
47
HuangS. K.Peters-GoldenM. (2008). Eicosanoid Lipid Mediators in Fibrotic Lung Diseases. Chest133 (6), 1442–1450. 10.1378/chest.08-0306
48
HuangY.MaS.-F.EspindolaM. S.VijR.OldhamJ. M.HuffnagleG. B.et al (2017). Microbes Are Associated with Host Innate Immune Response in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196 (2), 208–219. 10.1164/rccm.201607-1525oc
49
HuebenerP.SchwabeR. F. (2013). Regulation of Wound Healing and Organ Fibrosis by Toll-like Receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.1832 (7), 1005–1017. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.017
50
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research NetworkRaghuG.AnstromK. J.KingT. E.Jr.LaskyJ. A.MartinezF. J. (2012). Prednisone, Azathioprine, and N-Acetylcysteine for Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med.366 (21), 1968–1977. 10.1056/NEJMoa1113354
51
InageM.NakamuraH.KatoS.SaitoH.AbeS.HinoT.et al (2000). Levels of Cytokeratin 19 Fragments in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Correlate to the Intensity of Neutrophil and Eosinophil-Alveolitis in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Med.94 (2), 155–160. 10.1053/rmed.1999.0712
52
JiangD.LiangJ.FanJ.YuS.ChenS.LuoY.et al (2005). Regulation of Lung Injury and Repair by Toll-like Receptors and Hyaluronan. Nat. Med.11 (11), 1173–1179. 10.1038/nm1315
53
KaoH.-K.ChenB.MurphyG. F.LiQ.OrgillD. P.GuoL. (2011). Peripheral Blood Fibrocytes. Ann. Surg.254 (6), 1066–1074. 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182251559
54
KaplanM. J.RadicM. (2012). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: Double-Edged Swords of Innate Immunity. J. Immunol.189 (6), 2689–2695. 10.4049/jimmunol.1201719
55
KawamuraK.IchikadoK.YasudaY.AnanK.SugaM. (2017). Azithromycin for Idiopathic Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Retrospective Single-center Study. BMC Pulm. Med.17 (1), 94. 10.1186/s12890-017-0437-z
56
KiesslingR.KleinE.ProssH.WigzellH. (1975). „Natural” Killer Cells in the Mouse. II. Cytotoxic Cells with Specificity for Mouse Moloney Leukemia Cells. Characteristics of the Killer Cell. Eur. J. Immunol.5 (2), 117–121. 10.1002/eji.1830050209
57
KimS. H.LeeJ. Y.YoonC. M.ShinH. J.LeeS. W.RosasI.et al (2020). Mitochondrial Antiviral Signalling Protein Is Crucial for the Development of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.57, 2000652. 10.1183/13993003.00652-2020
58
KinderB. W.BrownK. K.SchwarzM. I.IxJ. H.KervitskyA.KingT. E.Jr (2008). Baseline BAL Neutrophilia Predicts Early Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest133 (1), 226–232. 10.1378/chest.07-1948
59
KingT. E.Jr.AlberaC.BradfordW. Z.CostabelU.HormelP.LancasterL.et al (2009). Effect of Interferon Gamma-1b on Survival in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (INSPIRE): a Multicentre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet374 (9685), 222–228. 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60551-1
60
KirillovV.SilerJ. T.RamadassM.GeL.DavisJ.GrantG.et al (2015). Sustained Activation of Toll-like Receptor 9 Induces an Invasive Phenotype in Lung Fibroblasts. Am. J. Pathol.185 (4), 943–957. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.12.011
61
KrugerP.SaffarzadehM.WeberA. N.RieberN.RadsakM.von BernuthH.et al (2015). Neutrophils: Between Host Defence, Immune Modulation, and Tissue Injury. Plos Pathog.11 (3), e1004651. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004651
62
LaiD. M.ShuQ.FanJ. (2016). The Origin and Role of Innate Lymphoid Cells in the Lung. Mil. Med. Res.3, 25. 10.1186/s40779-016-0093-2
63
LandW. G. (2015). The Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Human Diseases: Part I - Promoting Inflammation and Immunity. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J.15 (1), e9–e21.
64
Larson-CaseyJ. L.DeshaneJ. S.RyanA. J.ThannickalV. J.CarterA. B. (2016). Macrophage Akt1 Kinase-Mediated Mitophagy Modulates Apoptosis Resistance and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Immunity44 (3), 582–596. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.001
65
LawsonW. E.GrantS. W.AmbrosiniV.WombleK. E.DawsonE. P.LaneK. B.et al (2004). Genetic Mutations in Surfactant Protein C Are a Rare Cause of Sporadic Cases of IPF. Thorax59 (11), 977–980. 10.1136/thx.2004.026336
66
LeeJ. S.CollardH. R.RaghuG.SweetM. P.HaysS. R.CamposG. M.et al (2010). Does Chronic Microaspiration Cause Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis?Am. J. Med.123 (4), 304–311. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.07.033
67
LiL. C.GaoJ.LiJ. (2014). Emerging Role of HMGB 1 in Fibrotic Diseases. J. Cel. Mol. Med.18 (12), 2331–2339. 10.1111/jcmm.12419
68
LiX. X.JiangD. Y.HuangX. X.GuoS. L.YuanW.DaiH. P. (2015). Toll-like Receptor 4 Promotes Fibrosis in Bleomycin-Induced Lung Injury in Mice. Genet. Mol. Res.14 (4), 17391–17398. 10.4238/2015.december.21.8
69
LiY.GaoJ.WangG.FeiG. (2016). Latent Cytomegalovirus Infection Exacerbates Experimental Pulmonary Fibrosis by Activating TGF-β1. Mol. Med. Rep.14 (2), 1297–1301. 10.3892/mmr.2016.5366
70
LiangJ.ZhangY.XieT.LiuN.ChenH.GengY.et al (2016). Hyaluronan and TLR4 Promote Surfactant-Protein-C-Positive Alveolar Progenitor Cell Renewal and Prevent Severe Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Nat. Med.22 (11), 1285–1293. 10.1038/nm.4192
71
LindauD.GielenP.KroesenM.WesselingP.AdemaG. J. (2013). The Immunosuppressive Tumour Network: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Regulatory T Cells and Natural Killer T Cells. Immunology138 (2), 105–115. 10.1111/imm.12036
72
ListonA.MastersS. L. (2017). Homeostasis-altering Molecular Processes as Mechanisms of Inflammasome Activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol.17 (3), 208–214. 10.1038/nri.2016.151
73
LiuH. Z.YangH. Z.MiS.CuiB.HuaF.HuZ. W. (2010). Toll like Receptor 2 Mediates Bleomycin-Induced Acute Lung Injury, Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. Yao Xue Xue Bao45 (8), 976–986.
74
LuckhardtT. R.CoomesS. M.TrujilloG.StoolmanJ. S.VannellaK. M.BhanU.et al (2011). TLR9-induced Interferon Beta Is Associated with protection from Gammaherpesvirus-Induced Exacerbation of Lung Fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair4, 18. 10.1186/1755-1536-4-18
75
MadalaS. K.EdukullaR.SchmidtS.DavidsonC.IkegamiM.HardieW. D. (2014). Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells Are Invasive and Hyperproliferative and Alter Transforming Growth Factor-α-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol.50 (4), 777–786. 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0042oc
76
MadsenD. H.LeonardD.MasedunskasA.MoyerA.JürgensenH. J.PetersD. E.et al (2013). M2-like Macrophages Are Responsible for Collagen Degradation through a Mannose Receptor-Mediated Pathway. J. Cel Biol.202 (6), 951–966. 10.1083/jcb.201301081
77
ManikaK.Alexiou-DanielS.PapakostaD.PapaA.KontakiotisT.PatakasD.et al (2007). Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid from Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffuse Lung Dis.24 (2), 134–140.
78
MidwoodK.SacreS.PiccininiA. M.InglisJ.TrebaulA.ChanE.et al (2009). Tenascin-C Is an Endogenous Activator of Toll-like Receptor 4 that Is Essential for Maintaining Inflammation in Arthritic Joint Disease. Nat. Med.15 (7), 774–780. 10.1038/nm.1987
79
MogensenT. H. (2009). Pathogen Recognition and Inflammatory Signaling in Innate Immune Defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.22 (2), 240–273. 10.1128/cmr.00046-08
80
MolyneauxP. L.CoxM. J.Willis-OwenS. A. G.MalliaP.RussellK. E.RussellA.-M.et al (2014). The Role of Bacteria in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.190 (8), 906–913. 10.1164/rccm.201403-0541oc
81
MonticelliL. A.SonnenbergG. F.AbtM. C.AlenghatT.ZieglerC. G. K.DoeringT. A.et al (2011). Innate Lymphoid Cells Promote Lung-Tissue Homeostasis after Infection with Influenza Virus. Nat. Immunol.12 (11), 1045–1054. 10.1038/ni.2131
82
MoraA. L.Torres-GonzálezE.RojasM.XuJ.RitzenthalerJ.SpeckS. H.et al (2007). Control of Virus Reactivation Arrests Pulmonary Herpesvirus-Induced Fibrosis in IFN-γ Receptor-Deficient Mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.175 (11), 1139–1150. 10.1164/rccm.200610-1426oc
83
MurrayL. A.HabielD. M.HohmannM.CameloA.ShangH.ZhouY.et al (2017). Antifibrotic Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Pulmonary Fibrosis. JCI Insight2 (16), e92192. 10.1172/jci.insight.92192
84
MurrayL. A.RosadaR.MoreiraA. P.JoshiA.KramerM. S.HessonD. P.et al (2010). Serum Amyloid P Therapeutically Attenuates Murine Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis via its Effects on Macrophages. PloS one5 (3), e9683. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009683
85
MurrayL. A.ChenQ.KramerM. S.HessonD. P.ArgentieriR. L.PengX.et al (2011). TGF-beta Driven Lung Fibrosis Is Macrophage Dependent and Blocked by Serum Amyloid P. Int. J. Biochem. Cel Biol.43 (1), 154–162. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.10.013
86
NeudeckerV.BrodskyK. S.ClambeyE. T.SchmidtE. P.PackardT. A.DavenportB.et al (2017). Neutrophil Transfer of miR-223 to Lung Epithelial Cells Dampens Acute Lung Injury in Mice. Sci. Transl. Med.9 (408), eaah5360. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aah5360
87
NothI.ZhangY.MaS.-F.FloresC.BarberM.HuangY.et al (2013). Genetic Variants Associated with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Susceptibility and Mortality: a Genome-wide Association Study. Lancet Respir. Med.1 (4), 309–317. 10.1016/s2213-2600(13)70045-6
88
O'DwyerD. N.ArmstrongM. E.TrujilloG.CookeG.KeaneM. P.FallonP. G.et al (2013). The Toll-like Receptor 3 L412F Polymorphism and Disease Progression in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.188 (12), 1442–1450. 10.1164/rccm.201304-0760OC
89
ObayashiY.YamadoriI.FujitaJ.YoshinouchiT.UedaN.TakaharaJ. (1997). The Role of Neutrophils in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest112 (5), 1338–1343. 10.1378/chest.112.5.1338
90
OdackalJ.YuV.Gomez-ManjerresD.FieldJ. J.BurdickM. D.MehradB. (2020). Circulating Fibrocytes as Prognostic Biomarkers of Autoimmune Interstitial Lung Disease. ERJ Open Res.6 (4), 00481. 10.1183/23120541.00481-2020
91
OldhamJ. M.MaS.-F.MartinezF. J.AnstromK. J.RaghuG.SchwartzD. A.et al (2015). TOLLIP,MUC5B, and the Response toN-Acetylcysteine Among Individuals with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.192 (12), 1475–1482. 10.1164/rccm.201505-1010oc
92
ParkJ. S.SvetkauskaiteD.HeQ.KimJ.-Y.StrassheimD.IshizakaA.et al (2004). Involvement of Toll-like Receptors 2 and 4 in Cellular Activation by High Mobility Group Box 1 Protein. J. Biol. Chem.279 (9), 7370–7377. 10.1074/jbc.m306793200
93
PechkovskyD. V.PrasseA.KollertF.EngelK. M. Y.DentlerJ.LuttmannW.et al (2010). Alternatively Activated Alveolar Macrophages in Pulmonary Fibrosis-Mediator Production and Intracellular Signal Transduction. Clin. Immunol.137 (1), 89–101. 10.1016/j.clim.2010.06.017
94
PeeblesR. S.Jr. (2015). At the Bedside: the Emergence of Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Human Disease. J. Leukoc. Biol.97 (3), 469–475. 10.1189/jlb.3bt0814-383r
95
PengX.MooreM.MathurA.ZhouY.SunH.GanY.et al (2016). Plexin C1 Deficiency Permits Synaptotagmin 7-mediated Macrophage Migration and Enhances Mammalian Lung Fibrosis. FASEB J.30, 4056. 10.1096/fj.201600373R
96
PiccininiA. M.Zuliani-AlvarezL.LimJ. M. P.MidwoodK. S. (2016). Distinct Microenvironmental Cues Stimulate Divergent TLR4-Mediated Signaling Pathways in Macrophages. Sci. Signal.9 (443), ra86. 10.1126/scisignal.aaf3596
97
QuanT. E.CowperS. E.BucalaR. (2006). The Role of Circulating Fibrocytes in Fibrosis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep.8 (2), 145–150. 10.1007/s11926-006-0055-x
98
RaghuG.BrownK. K.BradfordW. Z.StarkoK.NobleP. W.SchwartzD. A.et al (2004). A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Interferon Gamma-1b in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med.350 (2), 125–133. 10.1056/nejmoa030511
99
RaghuG.BrownK. K.CostabelU.CottinV.du BoisR. M.LaskyJ. A.et al (2008). Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis with Etanercept. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.178 (9), 948–955. 10.1164/rccm.200709-1446oc
100
RaghuG.CollardH. R.EganJ. J.MartinezF. J.BehrJ.BrownK. K.et al (2011). An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-Based Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.183 (6), 788–824. 10.1164/rccm.2009-040gl
101
RaghuG.FreudenbergerT. D.YangS.CurtisJ. R.SpadaC.HayesJ.et al (2006). High Prevalence of Abnormal Acid Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.27 (1), 136–142. 10.1183/09031936.06.00037005
102
RaghuG.MartinezF. J.BrownK. K.CostabelU.CottinV.WellsA. U.et al (2015). CC-chemokine Ligand 2 Inhibition in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: a Phase 2 Trial of Carlumab. Eur. Respir. J.46 (6), 1740–1750. 10.1183/13993003.01558-2014
103
ReilkoffR. A.BucalaR.HerzogE. L. (2011). Fibrocytes: Emerging Effector Cells in Chronic Inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol.11 (6), 427–435. 10.1038/nri2990
104
RohaniM. G.McMahanR. S.RazumovaM. V.HertzA. L.CieslewiczM.PunS. H.et al (2015). MMP-10 Regulates Collagenolytic Activity of Alternatively Activated Resident Macrophages. J. Invest. Dermatol.135 (10), 2377–2384. 10.1038/jid.2015.167
105
RyuC.SunH.GulatiM.Herazo-MayaJ. D.ChenY.Osafo-AddoA.et al (2017). Extracellular Mitochondrial DNA Is Generated by Fibroblasts and Predicts Death in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196, 1571. 10.1164/rccm.201612-2480OC
106
SahaS.ArandaE.HayakawaY.BhanjaP.AtayS.BrodinN. P.et al (2016). Macrophage-derived Extracellular Vesicle-Packaged WNTs rescue Intestinal Stem Cells and Enhance Survival after Radiation Injury. Nat. Commun.7, 13096. 10.1038/ncomms13096
107
SakamotoK.FurukawaT.YamanoY.KataokaK.TeramachiR.WaliaA.et al (2021). Serum Mitochondrial DNA Predicts the Risk of Acute Exacerbation and Progression of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J.57 (1), 2001346. 10.1183/13993003.01346-2020
108
ScottM. K. D.QuinnK.LiQ.CarrollR.WarsinskeH.VallaniaF.et al (2019). Increased Monocyte Count as a Cellular Biomarker for Poor Outcomes in Fibrotic Diseases: a Retrospective, Multicentre Cohort Study. Lancet Respir. Med.7 (6), 497–508. 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30508-3
109
SelmanM.PardoA. (2006). Role of Epithelial Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: from Innocent Targets to Serial Killers. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc.3 (4), 364–372. 10.1513/pats.200601-003tk
110
SidesM. D.KlingsbergR. C.ShanB.GordonK. A.NguyenH. T.LinZ.et al (2011). The Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 1 and Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Synergistically Induce Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Lung Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol.44 (6), 852–862. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0232oc
111
SolisA. G.BieleckiP.SteachH. R.SharmaL.HarmanC. C. D.YunS.et al (2019). Mechanosensation of Cyclical Force by PIEZO1 Is Essential for Innate Immunity. Nature573 (7772), 69–74. 10.1038/s41586-019-1485-8
112
SonnenbergG. F.ArtisD. (2015). Innate Lymphoid Cells in the Initiation, Regulation and Resolution of Inflammation. Nat. Med.21 (7), 698–708. 10.1038/nm.3892
113
SontakeV.ShanmukhappaS. K.DiPasqualeB. A.ReddyG. B.MedvedovicM.HardieW. D.et al (2015). Fibrocytes Regulate Wilms Tumor 1-Positive Cell Accumulation in Severe Fibrotic Lung Disease. J. Immunol.195 (8), 3978–3991. 10.4049/jimmunol.1500963
114
StockmannC.KerdilesY.NomaksteinskyM.WeidemannA.TakedaN.DoedensA.et al (2010). Loss of Myeloid Cell-Derived Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Accelerates Fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.107 (9), 4329–4334. 10.1073/pnas.0912766107
115
StrieterR. M.KeeleyE. C.BurdickM. D.MehradB. (2009). The Role of Circulating Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells, Fibrocytes, in Promoting Pulmonary Fibrosis. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc.120, 49–59.
116
TakemasaA.IshiiY.FukudaT. (2012). A Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor Prevents Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. Eur. Respir. J.40 (6), 1475–1482. 10.1183/09031936.00127011
117
TangD.KangR.CoyneC. B.ZehH. J.LotzeM. T. (2012). PAMPs and DAMPs: Signal 0s that spur Autophagy and Immunity. Immunol. Rev.249 (1), 158–175. 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2012.01146.x
118
TangY. W.JohnsonJ.Cruz-GervisR.GrahamB.BrighamK.OatesJ.et al (2001). Increased Detection of Herpesvirus DNA in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Chest120 (1 Suppl. l), 74S–5S. 10.1378/chest.120.1_suppl.s74-a
119
TianR.ZhuY.YaoJ.MengX.WangJ.XieH.et al (2017). NLRP3 Participates in the Regulation of EMT in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Exp. Cel Res.357 (2), 328–334. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.05.028
120
ToossiZ.HirschC. S.HamiltonB. D.KnuthC. K.FriedlanderM. A.RichE. A. (1996). Decreased Production of TGF-Beta 1 by Human Alveolar Macrophages Compared with Blood Monocytes. J. Immunol.156 (9), 3461–3468.
121
TravisW. D.CostabelU.HansellD. M.KingT. E.Jr.LynchD. A.NicholsonA. G.et al (2013). An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Update of the International Multidisciplinary Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.188 (6), 733–748. 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483st
122
TrujilloG.MeneghinA.FlahertyK. R.ShollL. M.MyersJ. L.KazerooniE. A.et al (2010). TLR9 Differentiates Rapidly from Slowly Progressing Forms of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med.2 (57), 57ra82. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001510
123
van GeffenC.DeisslerA.QuanteM.RenzH.HartlD.KolahianS. (2021). Regulatory Immune Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Friends or Foes?. Front. Immunol.12, 663203. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.663203
124
WrightJ. R. (1990). Clearance and Recycling of Pulmonary Surfactant. Am. J. Physiology-Lung Cell Mol. Physiol.259 (2 Pt 1), L1–L12. 10.1152/ajplung.1990.259.2.l1
125
WynnT. A. (2011). Integrating Mechanisms of Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Exp. Med.208 (7), 1339–1350. 10.1084/jem.20110551
126
WynnT. A.VannellaK. M. (2016). Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis. Immunity44 (3), 450–462. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015
127
XaubetA.AgustíC.LuburichP.BarberáJ. A.CarriónM.AyusoM. C.et al (1998). Interleukin-8 Expression in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cells in the Evaluation of Alveolitis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Med.92 (2), 338–344. 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90118-4
128
XieN.TanZ.BanerjeeS.CuiH.GeJ.LiuR.-M.et al (2015). Glycolytic Reprogramming in Myofibroblast Differentiation and Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.192 (12), 1462–1474. 10.1164/rccm.201504-0780oc
129
YoungL. R.GullemanP. M.ShortC. W.TanjoreH.SherrillT.QiA.et al (2016). Epithelial-macrophage Interactions Determine Pulmonary Fibrosis Susceptibility in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. JCI Insight1 (17), e88947. 10.1172/jci.insight.88947
130
ZhouY.HeC. H.HerzogE. L.PengX.LeeC.-M.NguyenT. H.et al (2015). Chitinase 3-like-1 and its Receptors in Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome-Associated Lung Disease. J. Clin. Invest.125 (8), 3178–3192. 10.1172/jci79792
131
ZhouY.PengH.SunH.PengX.TangC.GanY.et al (2014). Chitinase 3-like 1 Suppresses Injury and Promotes Fibroproliferative Responses in Mammalian Lung Fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med.6 (240), 240ra76. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007096
132
ZosoA.MazzaE. M. C.BicciatoS.MandruzzatoS.BronteV.SerafiniP.et al (2014). Human Fibrocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Express IDO and Promote Tolerance via Treg-Cell Expansion. Eur. J. Immunol.44 (11), 3307–3319. 10.1002/eji.201444522
Summary
Keywords
innate immunity, macrophage, pulmonary fibrosis, microenvironment, biomarker
Citation
Ishikawa G, Liu A and Herzog EL (2021) Evolving Perspectives on Innate Immune Mechanisms of IPF. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8:676569. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.676569
Received
05 March 2021
Accepted
29 July 2021
Published
09 August 2021
Volume
8 - 2021
Edited by
Mark Glynne Jones, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Prabhat Kumar Sharma, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
Satish Kumar Madala, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, United States
Isis Fernandez, Helmholtz Center Munich, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Ishikawa, Liu and Herzog.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Erica L. Herzog, erica.herzog@yale.edu
This article was submitted to Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.