ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mol. Biosci., 21 June 2021

Sec. Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Volume 8 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.677979

Molecular Associations and Clinical Significance of RAPs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • 1. Laboratory Oncology Unit, Dr. BRA-IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • 2. Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • 3. Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a high rate of mortality. Multiple studies have individually recognized members of RAP gene family as critical regulators of tumor progression in several cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma. These studies suffer numerous limitations including a small sample size and lack of analysis of various clinicopathological and molecular features. In the current study, we utilized authoritative multi-omics databases to determine the association of RAP gene family expression and detailed molecular and clinicopathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). All five RAP genes were observed to harbor dysregulated expression in HCC compared to normal liver tissues. RAP2A exhibited strongest ability to differentiate tumors from the normal tissues. RAP2A expression was associated with progressive tumor grade, TP53 and CTNNB1 mutation status. Additionally, RAP2A expression was associated with the alteration of its copy numbers and DNA methylation. RAP2A also emerged as an independent marker for patient prognosis. Further, pathway analysis revealed that RAP2A expression is correlated with tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition and oncogenic molecular pathways, such as cell cycle and cellular metabolism.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth leading cancer in incidence and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality in the world (Bray et al., 2018). It is the most common type of primary liver cancer that usually arises on the background of chronic liver disease, hepatitis B or C virus infection, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Bruix et al., 2011; Villanueva, 2019). For locally advanced cancers without cirrhosis, the 5-years survival rate of patients is only 36–70% and 60–70% with successful surgical resection or liver transplantation, respectively. Further, postoperative recurrence and metastasis are common in HCC, which pose a challenge in the management of this disease. Therefore, biomarkers to predict prognosis in HCC are highly needed. The common indicators of prognosis of HCC include tumor size, degree of cirrhosis, tumor differentiation and microvascular invasion (Villanueva, 2019). The recent emergence of high throughput sequencing data by multiple studies has enabled researchers to describe molecular features of HCC in detail and has provided several potential biomarkers for the prediction of patient prognosis (Wheeler and Roberts, 2017).

RAP proteins (Ras proximate proteins) are members of the Ras GTP binding family sharing 50–60% sequence homology with the Ras family. The diversity and specificity of Ras and RAP proteins are contributed by different sets of GEFs (guanine nucleotide exchange factors) and GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Five different genes of the RAP family, RAP1A, RAP1B, RAP2A, RAP2B, and RAP2C have been identified in the human genome (Bokoch, 1993). RAP proteins primarily function in cell adhesion, migration, and polarity (Bokoch, 1993; Ehrhardt et al., 2002; Di et al., 2015b; Qu et al., 2016; Meng et al., 2018). The effect of RAP activation depends on the context-specific interaction of RAP with their regulators and downstream effectors.

Oncogenic functions of RAP proteins have been well established in multiple cancer types, such as breast (Di et al., 2015a), lung (Fu et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2016), ovary (Che et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2016), stomach (Zhang J. et al., 2020), cervix (Li et al., 2018), prostate (Bigler et al., 2007) and brain (Wang et al., 2017). Accumulating evidence suggests that RAP proteins also play critical roles in hepatocellular carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in RAP1A gene rs494453 has been shown to associate with higher incidence and recurrence after liver transplantation (Mo et al., 2018; Zhang R. et al., 2020). Further, higher activity of the NF-κB/RAP1 signaling pathway is associated with tumorigenicity in HCC cells (Mo et al., 2018). Some studies have also provided strong links between RAP1A expression and liver inflammation, a risk factor for liver carcinogenesis. RAPGEF1, the GEF for RAP1A has also been shown to be overexpressed in HCC (Sequera et al., 2018). A previous study reported that HBV replication promotes liver carcinogenesis through upregulation of RAP1B (Sheng et al., 2014). Further, overexpression of RAP1B enhances the proliferation and migration of HCC cells by regulating Twist-1 gene expression (Tang et al., 2018). Overexpression of RAB2B has also been reported in HCC and its inhibition reduces cell proliferation and invasion (Zhang et al., 2017). Recently, Zheng et al. reported that HCC tissues exhibit significantly higher mRNA and protein expression of RAP2A, which is associated with tumor size, metastasis, pathological differentiation, and vascular invasion (Zheng et al., 2017). Furthermore, they also demonstrated that higher protein levels of RAP2A are independently associated with poor overall survival in HCC.

While the current literature suggests that RAP genes might play critical roles in the pathophysiology of HCC, these studies are limited by determining individual genes of the RAP signaling pathway, limited number of clinical samples used in different studies. Further, studies focused on determining the association of RAP genes with genetic alteration and molecular alterations remain limited. In the current study, we utilized authoritative multi-omics databases to determine the association of RAP gene family expression and detailed molecular and clinicopathological features. Furthermore, we also determined their association with multiple survival parameters to determine their prognostic value.

Materials and Methods

Data Retrieval

For mRNA expression analysis, RNA seq data of TCGA-LIHC dataset, which was originally sourced from Broad GDAC Firehose (http://gdac.broadinstitute.org/) (Wheeler and Roberts, 2017) was extracted using UCSC XENA webserver (Goldman et al., 2020). Clinicopathological and molecular characterstics of the TCGA-LIHC dataset has been given in Table 1. Microarray gene expression data from multiple studies was accessed through the TNMplot webserver (Bartha and Győrffy, 2020). This web server hosts data from multiple HCC studies, where gene expression data has been normalized for all available studies and can be used for comparison between the collective groups of all normal samples with tumor samples. Multi-Omics dataset of hepatocellular carcinoma released by Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) (https://cptac-data-portal.georgetown.edu/cptacPublic/) was utilized to analyze both mRNA and protein levels of RAP genes.

TABLE 1

CharactersticsTotal (370)%
Age (years)≤507520.67
>5028879.33
GenderMale24567.30
Female11932.7
StageI + II25373.76
III + IV9026.24
GradeI + II22763.23
III + IV13236.77
AFP levels⩽ 40021276.81
> 4006423.19
History of alcohol consumptionNo23366.57
Yes11733.43
Postoperative ablation embolizationNo31791.88
Yes288.12
Radiation therapyNo33697.67
Yes82.33
TP53 mutationNo25270.19
Yes10729.81
CTNNB1 mutationNo26674.09
Yes9325.91
PCLO mutationNo32089.13
Yes3910.87
ALB mutationNo31587.74
Yes4412.26

Patient charcterstics in TCGA-LIHC dataset.

DNA Methylation Analysis

DNA methylation of RAP genes in TCGA cancer dataset was estimated and visualized using MEXPRESS web server (https://mexpress.be) (Koch et al., 2015; Koch et al., 2019) and TCGA Wanderer (Díez-Villanueva et al., 2015). The MEXPRESS web server uses DNA methylation data of cancer and normal tissues from TCGA datasets, which were originally developed on the Illumina Human Methylation 450 BeadChip platform. The predesignated methylation probes for each gene were taken into consideration.

Survival Analysis

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using the tool available in the KM-plotter (Nagy et al., 2018). For Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients were distributed in high and low expression groups based on median expression value as a cut-off point for each gene. For survival analysis using univariate and multivariate Cox proportionate hazard model, RAP2A gene expression was taken as a continuous variable with multiple survival parameters for the TCGA-LIHC dataset, as recommended (Liu et al., 2018).

Correlation and Pathway Enrichment Analysis

Similarly, whole transcriptome correlations of RAP2A in the TCGA-LIHC study were downloaded from the cBioPortal website (https://www.cbioportal.org/) (Cerami et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2013). After applying a filter for a cutoff of FDR corrected p-value of 0.05 for Spearman’s r-value, 10,980 genes with Spearman’s correlation q value <0.05 were filtered and used for gene set enrichment analysis in GSEA software (Broad Institute, http://www.broad.mit.edu/gsea/). Hallmark gene set (version 7.1) (Subramanian et al., 2005) from predefined molecular signature database was used as a reference gene set for pathway enrichment (Liberzon et al., 2015).

Tumor Immunity Associations

Tumor immune estimation score (TIMER) webserver (https://cistrome.shinyapps.io/timer/), which utilizes the RNA sequencing data from TCGA for estimation of correlation between gene expression and level of immune cells, present in the tumor samples (Li et al., 2017). We utilized TIMER to calculate the association between RAP2A gene expression with infiltration of six immune cells including B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells in TCGA-LIHC datasets. Default parameters were used in the TIMER database for the gene-specific analysis module.

Further, CIBERSORT (Cell-type Identification By Estimating Relative Subsets Of RNA Transcripts) analysis data of TCGA-LIHC were extracted from a previously published study (Chen et al., 2018; Thorsson et al., 2018). This provided relative fractions of 22 different immune cells from a mixture of gene expression profiles (TCGA-LIHC study) and was used to correlate with RAP2A expression using Spearman’s correlation test. A total of 360 HCC samples were available with both gene expression data and CIBERSORT analysis estimated fractions of immune cells. Heatmap of the immune cell profiling data was generated along with hierarchical clustering using HemI (Deng et al., 2014). The default parameters of hierarchical clustering using the average linkage method and Pearson distance were used.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using Graphpad (version 6) and Stata software (version 11). Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparison among histological subtypes, molecular subtype and grades (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; ns, p > 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the association of DNA methylation of RAP2A to its expression in the TCGA-LIHC dataset. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Expression Pattern of RAPs in HCC

Further, RNA sequencing data from TCGA-LIHC study was utilized to compare RAP gene expression in tumor tissues with both tumor adjacent normal tissues from the same dataset and with non-tumor associated normal hepatic tissue. RAP1A, RAP1B, RAP2A and RAP2B exhibited significant higher expression in tumors compared to other two groups (Figures 1A,C,E,G). Although RAP2C expression was higher in tumors compared to adjacent normal tissues, but both these groups exhibited lower expression of RAP2C compared to normal tissues from GTEx (Figure 1I). Furthermore, tumor adjacent normal tissues also exhibited higher expression of RAP1A and RAP2B, while no difference was observed for RAP1B and RAP2A. Comparison between 50 paired normal and tumor tissues from TCGA-LIHC also revealed that all RAP genes exhibit higher expression in tumor tissues compared to tumor adjacent normal tissues (Figures 1B,D,F,H,J). Among all RAPs, RAP2A displayed most robust upregulation in tumor tissues in TCGA dataset (Figure 1F). Further, we utilized multiomics data of hepatocellular carcinoma developed by CPTAC study, where both mRNA and proteomic data was available. The expression analysis in CPTAC data also suggested that expression of RAP genes differ between normal and tumor tissues both at the mRNA and protein level. In CPTAC data also, RAP2A exhibited most robust upregulation of mRNA and protein levels in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues, while expression of RAP2C was found to be reduced in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues (Supplementary Figure S1).

FIGURE 1

We further performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine potential of RAP gene expression in differentiating tumor tissues from normal liver tissues. Interestingly, among five RAP genes, RAP2A exhibited highest area under curve (AUC) of 0.8676 in TCGA-LIHC mRNA data (Figure 2A). Similarly, analysis of CPTAC mRNA data also suggested highest AUC of RAP2A (AUC: 0.9173, Figure 2B) compared to other RAP genes. Interestingly, analysis of AUC in CPTAC protein expression data revealed that RAP2C exhibit highest AUC of 0.8445 followed by RAP2A with AUC of 0.8172 (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2

Furthermore, expression data of RAP gene family in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and normal tissues from multiple other datasets was assessed through TNMplot web server. The analysis revealed that RAP1A, RAP1B, RAP2A, and RAP2B genes exhibit significantly higher expression in HCC tissues compared to normal tissues in comparison of both available paired (Supplementary Figure S2, left panel) and unpaired tissues (Supplementary Figure S2, right panel). However, RAP2C did not exhibit significant difference in expression in paired tissue analysis (Supplementary Figures S2J). Considering robust upregulation of RAP2A in tumors, and its established involvement in cell migration, we compared expression of RAP2A in metastatic tissues with both normal and primary tissues, which revealed highest expression of RAP2A in metastatic tissues compared to other two groups (Figure 2D).

Association of RAP Family Expression and Clinicopathological Features in HCC

We further assessed the association of RAP genes with clinicopathological including pathological age, gender, stage, tumor grade, blood AFP levels. Among all RAP genes, higher expression of RAP1B was associated with advanced-stage (Figure 3A). Higher expression of RAP2A and RAP2B, and low expression of RAP1A was associated with advanced grade (Figure 3B). High RAP2A expression was associated with younger age (<50 years, Supplementary Figure S3A) and female gender (Supplementary Figure S3B). Higher expression of RAP2A was also associated with increased AFP levels (Figure 4A). A history of alcohol consumption was associated with lower levels of RAP2A and RAP2C expression (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

Association of RAP Family Expression and Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in HCC

To further determine whether the expression of RAP genes is associated with genetic alterations in HCC, we compared their expression in tumors with mutated or wild type TP53, CTNNB1, ALB, PCLO, and LRP1B. TP53 mutation was observed to be associated with higher expression of RAP1A, RAP1B, RAP2A, and RAP2B (Figure 5A). Further, CTNNB1 mutation was significantly associated with reduced levels of RAP1B, RAP2A, and RAP2B expression (Figure 5B). No RAP gene exhibited association with PCLO and ALB mutation status (Supplementary Figures S4A,B respectively), while higher expression of RAP1A was associated with LRPB1 mutant tumors (Supplementary Figure S5).

FIGURE 5

To determine the potential role of copy number alterations and DNA methylation in the regulation of RAP2A expression in HCC, we utilized a TCGA-LIHC study where copy number variation, DNA methylation, and gene expression data were available. The DNA methylation data in TCGA study was developed on “Illumina HumanMethylation450 Beadchip” platform, where representative CpG sites from different regions of most genes are captured. Interestingly, RAP2A gene expression was reduced in tumor tissues and exhibited a negative correlation with DNA methylation at several sites within the RAP2A promoter regions and gene body (Figures 6A,B). A similar association was also observed for normal liver tissues (Supplementary Figure S6). We observed that in both normal and tumor tissues, DNA methylation at an intragenic region represented by cg03608515 was most negatively correlated with gene expression, suggesting this region, but not promoter region is the major regulatory site for the expression (Figure 6C). Furthermore, a comparison of 47 paired normal and tumor tissue also revealed significantly reduced methylation levels of cg03608515 in tumor tissues., these results strongly suggest the role of DNA methylation in aberrant expression of RAP2A in HCC. Additionally, the expression of RAP2A was also positively correlated with its copy number (r = 0.450, p < 0.001). Further, analysis of CNV data revealed frequent alterations in RAP2A copy number in HCC tissues was associated with its higher expression with copy number gain (Figure 6D, Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.0001).

FIGURE 6

Prognostic Significance of RAP Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To determine the association of RAP gene family expression with patient prognosis, we utilized the TCGA-LIHC dataset where information for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free interval (DFI), and progression-free interval (PFI) was available. We performed survival analysis by constructing a Kaplan-Meier plot for all RAP genes using median expression levels for allotting patients into high and low groups. We observed that higher expression of RAP2A was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.72, CI = 1.21–2.45, p = 0.0023, Figure 7A) and DSS (HR = 1.9, CI = 1.2–2.99, p = 0.005, Figure 7B), while no significant association was observed with DFI and PFI (Figures 7C,D, respectively). In light of the high positive correlation of RAP2A with other RAP genes, we also assessed their association with patient survival (Supplementary Figure S7). Among other RAPs, higher expression of RAP1A and RAP1B was also associated with poor overall survival (Supplementary Figures S7A,B). We further performed univariate and multivariate survival analysis for RAP2A expression and other clinicopathological features, such as age, gender, stage, grade, alcohol intake history, radiotherapy status, and embolization status using Cox proportionate hazard model. Interestingly, higher RAP2A expression was also associated with poor OS, DSS, and PFI in both univariate and multivariate survival analysis (Tables 2, 3, respectively). This suggested that RAP2A expression is independently associated with poor outcome in HCC patients.

FIGURE 7

TABLE 2

OSDSSDFIPFI
Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]
Age1.0140.0561.000–1.028-1.0070.4190.990–1.0250.9980.7420.985–1.0110.9960.4490.984–1.007
Gender1.2290.2590.859–1.7581.2430.3530.786–1.9650.8910.5250.625–1.2721.0720.6620.785–1.465
Stage 1(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)
 21.5350.0860.941–2.5041.7340.1180.869–3.4621.7080.0141.116–2.6141.9430.0011.321–2.857
 32.7280.0001.774–4.1934.1690.0002.342–7.4242.8290.0001.876–4.2652.7210.0001.874–3.952
 45.3180.0021.892–14.9509.3310.0002.731–31.87823.2140.0023.055–176.3626.9510.0002.483–19.456
Grade 1(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)
 21.2690.3870.740–2.1751.3160.4430.653–2.6531.4890.1560.859–2.5821.1890.4510.758–1.865
 31.2680.4090.721–2.2301.4130.3510.683–2.9241.7240.0560.986–3.0151.3470.2090.846–2.142
 41.5140.4580.507–4.5190.6890.7240.088–5.4111.0020.9980.291–3.4460.9200.8770.320–2.647
Embolization0.8590.6330.461–1.6021.3500.3610.709–2.5682.3020.0001.443–3.6742.2180.0001.457– 3.375
Radiation0.9590.9430.304–3.0210.9860.9840.241–4.0241.5900.3100.649–3.8921.5440.2970.683–3.494
Alcohol history1.0500.7990.719–1.5351.4660.0990.930–2.3111.1300.5020.791–1.6161.0430.7940.760–1.432
RAP2A1.3250.0001.132–1.5501.4290.0011.166–1.7501.0990.2160.946–1.2761.1890.0111.040–1.359

Univariate analysis for association of RAP2A expression with patient prognosis in HCC.

OS, overall survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; DFI, disease-free interval; PFI, progression-free interval; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

TABLE 3

OSDSSDFIPFI
Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]Haz. ratioP[95% Conf. interval]
Age1.0280.0031.009–1.0471.0090.4100.987–1.0321.0020.8090.986–1.0181.0000.9820.987–1.013
Gender0.9710.8990.611–1.5421.1360.6790.622–2.0730.8730.5400.564–1.3490.9800.9180.662–1.449
Stage 1(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)
 21.6150.0960.918–2.8392.1430.0471.012–4.5381.8950.0101.165–3.0822.1000.0011.358–3.246
 32.8510.0001.775–4.5814.4390.0002.405–8.1933.9010.0002.451–6.2103.3110.0002.193–5.000
 45.2300.0301.176–23.2677.1370.0121.532–33.25233.0530.0014.123–265.0008.3460.0012.362–29.483
Grade 1(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)(Ref.)
 21.1260.7260.580–2.1851.8490.1910.736–4.6481.5050.2110.793–2.8551.1730.5680.678–2.028
 31.3230.4180.672–2.6031.8370.2090.712–4.7411.8370.0670.957–3.5271.2240.4840.695–2.154
 41.5930.4870.429–5.9241.4790.7250.168–13.0520.9790.9780.214–4.4870.8860.8500.253–3.101
Embolization1.0170.9660.470–2.2031.6610.2240.733–3.7663.6580.0002.075–6.4462.9660.0001.746–5.037
Radiation1.0570.9280.319–3.4981.0310.9670.239–4.4480.9960.9930.388–2.5561.1850.6980.503–2.789
Alcohol history0.9550.8490.597–1.5291.6820.0850.931–3.0401.0770.7400.696–1.6671.2440.2700.844–1.834
RAP2A1.2960.0111.062–1.5811.3340.0281.032–1.7241.0630.5280.879–1.2871.1990.0371.011–1.423

Multivariate analysis for association of RAP2A expression with patient prognosis in HCC.

OS, overall survival; DSS, disease-specific survival; DFI, disease-free interval; PFI, progression-free interval; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

RAP2A Associated Cellular Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To determine RAP2A associated cancer-related pathways, gene expression data of the TCGA-LIHC study was used. GSEA analysis revealed that RAP2A expression is positively correlated with cell cycle associated pathways such as mitotic spindle (Figure 8A), G2M checkpoint (Figure 8B), and E2F targets (Figure 8C) besides protein secretion (Figure 8D). Further, negatively correlated genes were enriched in metabolism associated pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 8E), xenobiotic metabolism (Figure 8F), fatty acid metabolism (Figure 8G), bile acid metabolism (Figure 8H), adipogenesis (Figure 8I), reactive oxygen species (Figure 8J) and others such as coagulation (Figure 8K), peroxisome (Figure 8L), interferon-alpha response (Figure 8M), DNA repair (Figure 8N) and Myc target genes (Figure 8O).

FIGURE 8

Association of RAP2A Expression With Tumor Immunity

Considering the previously described role of RAP genes in immune cell functions (Carvalho et al., 2019a), we analyzed the association of RAP2A expression with the level of immune cell infiltration. Using the TIMER tool, we determine tumor purity normalized spearman correlation of RAP2A expression with infiltration level of six different immune cells. This analysis revealed a positive correlation between RAP2A expression with B cells (r = 0.3, p = 1.37e-08), CD8+ T cells (r = 0.237, p = 9.06e-06), CD4+ T cells (r = 0.474, p = 1.16e-20), macrophages (r = 0.469, p = 4.56e-20), neutrophils (r = 0.374, p = 7.19e-13), and dendritic cells (r = 0.401, p = 1.36e-14) in HCC (Figure 9A). Furthermore, we utilized CIBERSORT analysis to determine the association of RAP2A gene expression with the relative abundance of 22 different types of immune cells in the TCGA-LIHC dataset (Figure 9B, Supplementary Table S2). Among immune cells, RAP2A expression was positively correlated to CD4 Memory Resting T cells, resting dendritic cells, neutrophils, M0 type macrophages, and naïve B cells, while it exhibited negative correlations to monocytes, activated NK cells, CD4 naïve T cells, CD8 T cells.

FIGURE 9

Discussion

HCC is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Significant advancement has been made in the treatment of this malignancy over the past decade, however, clinical response is highly heterogeneous. Further, treatment strategies have been highly adapted to be based on the progression of the disease at the time of diagnosis. Nevertheless, several molecular biomarkers have been determined with high prognostic value and future studies are required to determine novel molecular features as therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers. In the current study, we uncovered distinct genomic and epigenomic features of RAP family genes in HCC. Our study revealed that among five RAP genes, RAP2A expression is highly altered in HCC and is associated with multiple oncogenic features in HCC.

Little is known about the specific roles of RAP2A; in its active form RAP2A interacts with several effectors including MINK1, TNIK, and MAP4K4 and activates various signaling pathways involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements, cell migration, cell adhesion, and cell proliferation (Mittal and Linder, 2006). RAP2A interacts directly with upstream MAPK signaling element MAP4K4, and thus, increased RAP2A activity can enable downstream signaling (Machida et al., 2004). So far, the role of RAP2A in human malignancies remains controversial, with some suggesting it as a tumor suppressor gene while other studies refer to it as an oncogene. Upregulation of RAP2A has been observed in several human malignancies such as follicular thyroid cancer (Prabakaran et al., 2011), prostate cancer (Bigler et al., 2007), renal cancer (Wu et al., 2017), gastric cancer (Zhang J. et al., 2020) and bladder cancer (Wang et al., 2020).

In prostate cancer cells, RAP2A promotes androgen hypersensitivity and cell growth (Bigler et al., 2007). In lung cancer cells, ectopic expression of RAP2A enhances the migration and invasion of the cells (Wu et al., 2014). In bladder cancer cells, the expression of RAP2a was found significantly higher as compared to normal cells. The proliferation and invasion of cells were repressed by miR-3127 through directly targeting the 3′-UTR of RAP2A and associated with poor overall survival in bladder cancer patients (Wang et al., 2020). In gastric cancer, the role of RAP2A was also observed in drug resistance where expression of RAP2A increased the viability, migration, and metastasis of cells by suppressing apoptosis and DNA damage (Zhang J. et al., 2020). In renal cancer, overexpression of RAP2A enhances the protein levels of p-Akt and promotes migration and invasion of cells by increasing p-Akt expression (Wu et al., 2017). Contrary to these, RAP2A seems to play tumor suppressor functions in glioma as its downregulation is associated with glioma progression and its inhibition in the glioma cell line reduces migration and invasion (Wang et al., 2014). Results of the current study indicate that in hepatocellular carcinoma, RAP2A may act as an important oncogene and its mRNA expression is strongly associated with patient prognosis in HCC. Furthermore, other RAP genes also exhibit a strong positive correlation with RAP2A expression. This might be due to the conservation of regulatory sequences during evolution. We were further interested in whether RAP genes share common features for association with molecular characteristics in HCC.

It was recently demonstrated that RAP2A expression is regulated by p53 and RAP2A mediated cell migration and invasive properties are driven by downstream activation of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) MMP2 and MMP9 via phosphorylation of AKT (Wu et al., 2015). Consistent with this, we observed higher expression of multiple RAP genes, including RAP2A in p53 mutant HCC. Further, we also observed that expression of RAP1A, RAP1B, RAP2A, and RAP2B were reduced in HCC tissues which harbor a mutation in CTNNB1, the gene encoding for beta-catenin protein. This is contrary with the previous report where RAP1B has shown to activate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Jia et al., 2017). Further, RAPGEF2, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAP1, was shown to regulate adherence junction (AJ) formation in radial glial cells through ERK-mediated upregulation of β-catenin (Farag et al., 2017). While CTNNB1 mutations in HCC are associated with higher activity of Wnt-beta catenin signaling (Tornesello et al., 2013), its association with RAP signaling appears to be negatively related in this case. Therefore, our results suggested potential crosstalk of Wnt-beta catenin signaling in RAP signaling in HCC tissues.

In light of its aberrant overexpression in HCC, we explored whether the expression of RAP2A is driven by copy number alteration and DNA methylation in HCC. Our results collectively demonstrated that the RAP2A harbors alterations in both of the abovementioned features. Our results highlighted a specific intragenic region in the RAP2A where DNA methylation was highly reduced in tumor tissues compared to normal liver tissues. Further, DNA methylation at this region is negatively correlated to RAP2A gene expression in both tumor and normal tissues. DNA methylation of RAP2A has not been previously studied in cancer, therefore, epigenetic regulation of RAP signaling requires detailed exploration.

While our study is based on mRNA expression, a recent study by, Zheng et al. has also demonstrated that RAP2A protein expression is associated with oncogenic features in HCC (Zheng et al., 2017). Therefore, our findings further provide a detailed understanding of the role of all five members of this gene family involvement in HCC. Among all five RAPs, RAP2A expression exhibited a strong ability to differentiate tumor tissues from normal tissues. Further, its higher expression also exhibited association with higher tumor grade, metastasis, increased AFP levels, and poor patient prognosis. Furthermore, our multivariate survival analysis including major clinical and pathological features revealed that the RAP2A expression is independently associated with poor overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free interval in HCC.

Pathway analysis revealed strong associations of RAP2A expression in HCC with several HCC relevant pathways, including cell cycle-related pathways and metabolic pathways. Interestingly, RAP1A expression has previously been shown to be regulated during the cell cycle (Cruise et al., 1997). The causal relationship between RAP2A expression and these pathways requires further validation. We also analyzed the immunological association of RAP2A expression in HCC, which revealed that its expression is highly associated with the immune composition of HCC tumors. While, the role of RAP2A has been previously demonstrated in the regulation of lipopolysaccharide induced innate cell functions (Carvalho et al., 2019a; Carvalho et al., 2019b), detailed role of RAP2A in the modulation of tumor immunity remains to be studied in detail. Conclusively, the current study provides detailed molecular and clinical features associated with the expression of RAP genes in HCC, however, some of these associations require further exploration for the causal relationships. Further, these results support the potential of RAP2A as a therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker in this malignancy.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, SC and MA; supervision and resources, SC, RY, and AC; experimentation, MA, SK, and JS; Manuscript writing, MA and LK; manuscript editing, SC, RY, and AC. All authors have approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

Acknowledgments

MA acknowledges financial support as a fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India. SK acknowledges financial support as a fellowship from the Department of Health Research, Government of India. JS acknowledges financial support as a fellowship from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.677979/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    BarthaÁ.GyőrffyB. (2021). TNMplot.com: A Web Tool for the Comparison of Gene Expression in Normal, Tumor and Metastatic Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22. 10.3390/ijms22052622

  • 2

    BiglerD.GioeliD.ConawayM. R.WeberM. J.TheodorescuD. (2007). Rap2 Regulates Androgen Sensitivity in Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate67, 15901599. 10.1002/pros.20644

  • 3

    BokochG. M. (1993). Biology of the RAP Proteins, Members of the Ras Superfamily of GTP-Binding Proteins. Biochem. J.289 (Pt 1), 1724. 10.1042/bj2890017

  • 4

    BrayF.FerlayJ.SoerjomataramI.SiegelR. L.TorreL. A.JemalA. (2018). Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clinicians68, 394424. 10.3322/caac.21492

  • 5

    BruixJ.ShermanM.American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011). Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: an Update. Hepatology53, 10201022. 10.1002/hep.24199

  • 6

    CarvalhoB. C.OliveiraL. C.RochaC. D.FernandesH. B.OliveiraI. M.LeãõF. B.et al (2019a). Data in Support of RAP2A GTPase Expression, Activation and Effects in LPS-Mediated Innate Immune Response and NF-κB Activation. Data in Brief24, 103965. 10.1016/j.dib.2019.103965

  • 7

    CarvalhoB. C.OliveiraL. C.RochaC. D.FernandesH. B.OliveiraI. M.LeãoF. B.et al (2019b). Both knock-down and Overexpression of RAP2A Small GTPase in Macrophages Result in Impairment of NF-κB Activity and Inflammatory Gene Expression. Mol. Immunol.109, 2737. 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.02.015

  • 8

    CeramiE.GaoJ.DogrusozU.GrossB. E.SumerS. O.AksoyB. A.et al (2012). The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: An Open Platform for Exploring Multidimensional Cancer Genomics Data: Figure 1. Cancer Discov.2, 401404. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095

  • 9

    CheY.-L.LuoS.-J.LiG.ChengM.GaoY.-M.LiX.-M.et al (2015). The C3G/RAP1 Pathway Promotes Secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and Is Involved in Serous Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Cancer Lett.359, 241249. 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.01.019

  • 10

    ChenB.KhodadoustM. S.LiuC. L.NewmanA. M.AlizadehA. A. (2018). Profiling Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells with CIBERSORT. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ1711, 243259. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12

  • 11

    CruiseJ. L.RaffertyM. P.RiehleM. M. (1997). Cell-cycle Regulated Expression of RAP1 in Regenerating Liver. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun.230, 578581. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.6003

  • 12

    DengW.WangY.LiuZ.ChengH.XueY. (2014). HemI: A Toolkit for Illustrating Heatmaps. PLoS One9, e111988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111988

  • 13

    DiJ.HuangH.QuD.TangJ.CaoW.LuZ.et al (2015a). RAP2B Promotes Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Human Breast Cancer through Calcium-Related ERK1/2 Signaling Pathway. Sci. Rep.5, 12363. 10.1038/srep12363

  • 14

    DiJ.HuangH.WangY.QuD.TangJ.ChengQ.et al (2015b). p53 Target Gene RAP2B Regulates the Cytoskeleton and Inhibits Cell Spreading. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.141, 17911798. 10.1007/s00432-015-1948-8

  • 15

    Díez-VillanuevaA.MallonaI.PeinadoM. A. (2015). Wanderer, an Interactive Viewer to Explore DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data in Human Cancer. Epigenet. Chromatin8, 22. 10.1186/s13072-015-0014-8

  • 16

    EhrhardtA.EhrhardtG.GuoX.SchraderJ. (2002). Ras and Relatives-Job Sharing and Networking Keep an Old Family Together. Exp. Hematol.30, 10891106. 10.1016/s0301-472x(02)00904-9

  • 17

    FaragM. I.YoshikawaY.MaetaK.KataokaT. (2017). RAPGEF2, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for RAP1 Small GTPases, Plays a Crucial Role in Adherence junction (AJ) Formation in Radial Glial Cells through ERK-Mediated Upregulation of the AJ-Constituent Protein Expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.493, 139145. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.062

  • 18

    FuG.LiuY.YuanJ.ZhengH.ShiT.LeiW.et al (2009). [Identification and Functional Analysis of A Novel Candidate Oncogene RAP2B in Lung Cancer.]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi12, 273276. 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2009.04.03

  • 19

    GaoJ.AksoyB. A.DogrusozU.DresdnerG.GrossB.SumerS. O.et al (2013). Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signaling6, pl1. 10.1126/scisignal.2004088

  • 20

    GoldmanM. J.CraftB.HastieM.RepečkaK.McDadeF.KamathA.et al (2020). Visualizing and Interpreting Cancer Genomics Data via the Xena Platform. Nat. Biotechnol.38, 675678. 10.1038/s41587-020-0546-8

  • 21

    JiaZ.YangY.DengyanZ.ChunyangZ.DongleiL.KaiW.et al (2017). RAP1B, a DVL2 Binding Protein, Activates Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Gene611, 1520. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.01.021

  • 22

    KochA.De MeyerT.JeschkeJ.Van CriekingeW. (2015). MEXPRESS: Visualizing Expression, DNA Methylation and Clinical TCGA Data. BMC Genomics16, 636. 10.1186/s12864-015-1847-z

  • 23

    KochA.JeschkeJ.Van CriekingeW.van EngelandM.De MeyerT. (2019). MEXPRESS Update 2019. Nucleic Acids Res.47, W561W565. 10.1093/nar/gkz445

  • 24

    LiT.FanJ.WangB.TraughN.ChenQ.LiuJ. S.et al (2017). TIMER: A Web Server for Comprehensive Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells. Cancer Res.77, e108e110. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0307

  • 25

    LiY.LiS.HuangL. (2018). Knockdown of RAP2B, a Ras Superfamily Protein, Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion in Cervical Cancer Cells via Regulating the ERK1/2 Signaling Pathway. Oncol. Res.26, 123130. 10.3727/096504017X14912172235777

  • 26

    LiberzonA.BirgerC.ThorvaldsdóttirH.GhandiM.MesirovJ. P.TamayoP. (2015). The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection. Cel. Syst.1, 417425. 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004

  • 27

    LiuJ.LichtenbergT.HoadleyK. A.PoissonL. M.LazarA. J.CherniackA. D.et al (2018). An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics. Cell173, 400e11. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.052

  • 28

    LuL.WangJ.WuY.WanP.YangG. (2016). RAP1A Promotes Ovarian Cancer Metastasis via Activation of ERK/p38 and Notch Signaling. Cancer Med.5, 35443554. 10.1002/cam4.946

  • 29

    MachidaN.UmikawaM.TakeiK.SakimaN.MyagmarB.-E.TairaK.et al (2004). Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase Kinase 4 as a Putative Effector of RAP2 to Activate the C-Jun N-Terminal Kinase. J. Biol. Chem.279, 1571115714. 10.1074/jbc.C300542200

  • 30

    MengZ.QiuY.LinK. C.KumarA.PlaconeJ. K.FangC.et al (2018). RAP2 Mediates Mechanoresponses of the Hippo Pathway. Nature560, 655660. 10.1038/s41586-018-0444-0

  • 31

    MittalV.LinderM. E. (2006). Biochemical Characterization of RGS14: RGS14 Activity towards G-Protein α Subunits Is Independent of its Binding to RAP2A. Biochem. J.394, 309315. 10.1042/BJ20051086

  • 32

    MoS.-J.HouX.HaoX.-Y.CaiJ.-P.LiuX.ChenW.et al (2018). EYA4 Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth and Invasion by Suppressing NF-κB-dependent RAP1 Transactivation. Cancer Commun.38, 9. 10.1186/s40880-018-0276-1

  • 33

    NagyÁ.LánczkyA.MenyhártO.GyőrffyB. (2018). Validation of miRNA Prognostic Power in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Expression Data of Independent Datasets. Sci. Rep.8, 9227. 10.1038/s41598-018-27521-y

  • 34

    PengY.-G.ZhangZ.-Q.ChenY.-b.HuangJ.-A. (2016). RAP2b Promotes Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Lung Cancer Cells. J. Receptors Signal Transduction36, 459464. 10.3109/10799893.2015.1122044

  • 35

    PrabakaranI.GrauJ. R.LewisR.FrakerD. L.GuvakovaM. A. (2011). RAP2AIs Upregulated in Invasive Cells Dissected from Follicular Thyroid Cancer. J. Thyroid Res.2011, 16. 10.4061/2011/979840

  • 36

    QuD.HuangH.DiJ.GaoK.LuZ.ZhengJ. (2016). Structure, Functional Regulation and Signaling Properties of RAP2B. Oncol. Lett.11, 23392346. 10.3892/ol.2016.4261

  • 37

    SequeraC.ManzanoS.GuerreroC.PorrasA. (2018). How RAP and its GEFs Control Liver Physiology and Cancer Development. C3G Alterations in Human Hepatocarcinoma. Hepatic Oncol.5, HEP05. 10.2217/hep-2017-0026

  • 38

    ShengY.DingS.ChenK.ChenJ.WangS.ZouC.et al (2014). Functional Analysis of miR-101-3p and RAP1B Involved in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pathogenesis. Biochem. Cel. Biol.92, 152162. 10.1139/bcb-2013-0128

  • 39

    TangZ.PengH.ChenJ.LiuY.YanS.YuG.et al (2018). RAP1B Enhances the Invasion and Migration of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Up-Regulating Twist 1. Exp. Cel. Res.367, 5664. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.03.019

  • 40

    ThorssonV.GibbsD. L.BrownS. D.WolfD.BortoneD. S.Ou YangT. H.et al (2018). The Immune Landscape of Cancer. Immunity48, 812e14. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023

  • 41

    TorneselloM. L.BuonaguroL.TatangeloF.BottiG.IzzoF.BuonaguroF. M. (2013). Mutations in TP53, CTNNB1 and PIK3CA Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Infections. Genomics102, 7483. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.04.001

  • 42

    VillanuevaA. (2019). Hepatocellular Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med.380, 14501462. 10.1056/NEJMra1713263

  • 43

    WangL.ZhanW.XieS.HuJ.ShiQ.ZhouX.et al (2014). Over-expression of RAP2A Inhibits Glioma Migration and Invasion by Down-Regulating P-AKT. Cell Biol. Int.38, 326334. 10.1002/cbin.10213

  • 44

    WangL.ZhuB.WangS.WuY.ZhanW.XieS.et al (2017). Regulation of Glioma Migration and Invasion via Modification of RAP2A Activity by the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-1. Oncol. Rep.37, 25652574. 10.3892/or.2017.5572

  • 45

    WangX.MengR.HuQ.-M. (2020). LINC00319-Mediated miR-3127 Repression Enhances Bladder Cancer Progression through Upregulation of RAP2A. Front. Genet.11, 180. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00180

  • 46

    WheelerD. A.RobertsL. R. (2017). Comprehensive and Integrative Genomic Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cell169, 1327e23. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046

  • 47

    WuJ.SangM.CaoW.ZhengJ.PeiD. (2014). [Identification Analysis of Eukaryotic Expression Plasmid RAP2A and its Effect on the Migration of Lung Cancer Cells]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi17, 643648. 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.09.01

  • 48

    WuJ.-X.ZhangD.-G.ZhengJ.-N.PeiD.-S. (2015). RAP2A Is a Novel Target Gene of P53 and Regulates Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion. Cell Signal.27, 11981207. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.02.026

  • 49

    WuJ.-X.DuW.-Q.WangX.-C.WeiL.-L.HuoF.-C.PanY.-J.et al (2017). RAP2A Serves as a Potential Prognostic Indicator of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Promotes its Migration and Invasion through Up-Regulating P-Akt. Sci. Rep.7, 6623. 10.1038/s41598-017-06162-7

  • 50

    XieX.LiuH.WangM.DingF.XiaoH.HuF.et al (2015). miR-342-3p Targets RAP2B to Suppress Proliferation and Invasion of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Tumor Biol.36, 50315038. 10.1007/s13277-015-3154-3

  • 51

    ZhangL.DuanH.-b.YangY.-s. (2017). Knockdown of RAP2B Inhibits the Proliferation and Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Oncol. Res.25, 1927. 10.3727/096504016X14685034103914

  • 52

    ZhangJ.WeiY.MinJ.WangY.YinL.CaoG.et al (2020). Knockdown of RAP2A Gene Expression Suppresses Cisplatin Resistance in Gastric Cancer Cells. Oncol. Lett.19, 350358. 10.3892/ol.2019.11086

  • 53

    ZhangR.WuJ.YangY.XiaD.LiJ.QuanH.et al (2020). Donor Polymorphisms of RAP1A Rs494453 Contribute to a Higher Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation. J. Cancer11, 30823088. 10.7150/jca.39712

  • 54

    ZhengX.ZhaoW.JiP.ZhangK.JinJ.FengM.et al (2017). High Expression of RAP2A Is Associated with Poor Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol.10, 96079613.

Summary

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma, liver, RAP, TCGA, prognosis, biomarker 3

Citation

Kumari S, Arora M, Singh J, Kadian LK, Yadav R, Chauhan SS and Chopra A (2021) Molecular Associations and Clinical Significance of RAPs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8:677979. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.677979

Received

08 March 2021

Accepted

26 May 2021

Published

21 June 2021

Volume

8 - 2021

Edited by

Veronica Aran, Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (IECPN), Brazil

Reviewed by

Pooja Panwalkar, Weill Cornell Medicine, United States

Jasminka Omerovic, University of Split, Croatia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Anita Chopra, ; Shyam S. Chauhan,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Molecular Diagnostics and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics