Genomic Analyses of Metaplastic or Sarcomatoid Carcinomas From Different Organs Revealed Frequent Mutations in KMT2D

Abstract

Background: Metaplastic or sarcomatoid carcinomas (MSCs) are rare epithelial malignancies with heterologous histological differentiation that can occur in different organs. The objective of the current study was to identify novel somatically mutated genes in MSCs from different organs.

Methods: Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 16 paired MSCs originating from the breast (n = 10), esophagus (n = 3), lung (n = 2), and kidney (n = 1). In addition, we collected data on KMT2D mutations from eight independent cohorts (n = 195) diagnosed with MSCs derived from the breast (n = 83), liver (n = 8), esophagus (n = 15), lung (n = 10), and uterus or ovary (n = 79). The expression of KMT2D and its clinical significance were evaluated in our cohort.

Results: The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (13/16, 81%) and KMT2D (5/16,31%). We identified seven somatic KMT2D mutations in the exploratory cohort (n = 16 tumors), including three nonsense mutations, two frameshift indels, one missense mutation, and one splice site mutation. Interestingly, two patients showed double hits on KMT2D with nonsense mutations and frameshift indels. In the eight validation cohorts (n = 195), the average mutation rates for TP53 and KMT2D were 78% (152/195) and 13% (25/195), respectively. Two or more hits on KMT2D were also present in three validation cohorts. Furthermore, KMT2D mutations were associated with low expression of KMT2D, large tumor size and unfavorable prognosis.

Conclusions: These findings provide clues for understanding the genetic basis of MSCs originating from different organs and implicate KMT2D alteration as a frequent pathogenic mutation, allowing provision of appropriate treatment for this rare malignant disease in the future.

Introduction

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare type of breast cancer and is characterized by the presence of malignant cells showing squamous and/or mesenchymal differentiation (Weigelt et al., 2014; Krings and Chen, 2018). While this disease occurs in the lung (Liu et al., 2016), esophagus (Lu et al., 2018) and kidney (Park et al., 2020), it is frequently designated sarcomatoid carcinoma, which is typically defined by the presence of an epithelial component and a sarcoma-like (mesenchymal) component. For this tumor that occurs in the uterus or ovary, it is called a malignant mixed Müllerian tumor or carcinosarcoma (Jones et al., 2014; Cherniack et al., 2017). Currently, a unified pathologic diagnosis for metaplastic or sarcomatoid carcinomas (MSCs) from different organs is lacking, and the genetic alterations underlying the tumorigenesis of MSCs in different organs are still poorly understood. MSCs typically present at an advanced stage with an aggressive and poorly differentiated nature and do not respond well to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The overall prognosis is poor, and more effective therapeutic options are needed to treat patients (McCart Reed et al., 2019; Ersek et al., 2020).

Next-generation sequencing shows that TP53 is the most recurrently mutated gene in MSCs (Armstrong et al., 2009; Avigdor et al., 2017; Cherniack et al., 2017; Pécuchet et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019), but TP53 mutations are also frequently detected in other epithelial tumors. Molecular studies on MSCs originating from the breast (Avigdor et al., 2017), uterus or ovary (Gotoh et al., 2019), and liver (Zhang et al., 2019) show that the carcinoma and sarcoma components of MSCs are generally thought to be derived from a single-cell clone, as they have similar genetic alterations. However, it is unclear whether MSCs that exhibit heterologous histological differentiation in different organs have common genetic features.

In this study, we performed whole-exome analyses of 16 cases to determine the genomics of MSCs from different organs. In addition to common mutations in TP53, we found a previously unknown recurrently mutated gene, KMT2D (also known as KMT2B, MLL2 and MLL4), which functions as a major enhancer regulator in various biological processes, including in the regulation of development, differentiation, metabolism, and tumor suppression (Froimchuk et al., 2017). Due to the rarity of these diseases, eight cohorts (n = 195) containing KMT2D mutation information were analyzed. The expression of KMT2D and its clinical significance were further evaluated in our cohort. The findings contribute to our understanding of the basic genomics of MSCs that originate from different sites and highlight the histone methyltransferase KMT2D mutation in rare aggressive tumors.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Using a database of fresh tissues banked in a period spanning from 2010 to 2018, 16 patient samples diagnosed with MSCs were reviewed by two board-certified pathologists according to the criteria that the neoplasms exhibit heterologous differentiation in histology. Overall survival was defined as the time from surgery to death (June 2020). Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Number: 050432-4-1805C).

Whole–Exome Sequencing

Genomic DNA of each tumor component and matched adjacent normal tissue was extracted separately using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. DNA from the tumor and matched tissue of the 16 cases was subjected to whole-exome capture using the SureSelect Human All Exon v5 (Agilent) platform and to sequencing on a HiSeq 2000 Genome Analyzer (Illumina). Low-quality reads were excluded by Trimmomatic, the high-quality reads were mapped to the UCSC hg19 reference sequence with BWA (version 0.7.9a). PCR duplicates were removed using Picard (http://picard.sourceforge.net). Somatic variants were detected by Mutect (version 2), and the resulting sequences were analyzed for genomic alterations compared with normal genomic DNA. Annotation of variants was performed using Annovar (version 2017).

Sanger Sequencing

The primers used for PCR amplification are listed in Supplementary Table 1. PCR amplification was performed using PrimeSTAR Max DNA Polymerase (Takara). PCR products were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used for the analysis of sequence data.

Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 4 μm FFPE tumor slides according to standard procedures. The slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated. A heat-induced antigen retrieval step was employed using citrate buffer at pH 6.0. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by hydrogen peroxide treatment. Following incubation with protein blocking solution, slides were incubated at 4°C overnight with a KMT2D antibody (1:500, against the KMT2D C-terminus, HPA035977; Sigma-Aldrich). Signal amplification was performed using an IHC detection kit (KIT-5920; Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology, Fujian, China). Staining was scored for intensity (no staining; weak staining; strong staining).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States). Student’s independent sample t-tests were used for comparisons between groups. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the relationship between KMT2D mutation status and protein expression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival curves, and group differences were analyzed by the log-rank test. p values were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Whole-Exome Sequencing Was Used to Identify Novel Recurrent KMT2D Mutations in MSCs Originating From Different Organs

MSCs constitute a rare tumor type that has been diagnosed in various organs, including the uterus (Cherniack et al., 2017), breast (Avigdor et al., 2017), lung (Liu et al., 2016), esophagus (Lu et al., 2018), and liver (Zhang et al., 2019). Next-generation sequencing from each study showed that TP53 is the most recurrent mutation gene. Interestingly, MSCs from different organs all exhibited heterologous histological differentiation; therefore, we postulated that specific genetic features might contribute to the tumorigenesis of MSCs. In this study, to define the somatic genetic alterations in MSCs from different sites, 16 paired tumor and matched normal samples (Table 1, 10 pairs from the breast, three pairs from the esophagus, two pairs from the lung, and one pair from the kidney) were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES). The mutated genes in 16 MSCs were listed in Supplementary Table 2. Among the 16 tumors, the most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (13/16), KMT2D (5/16), MUC16 (4/16), and PIK3CA (4/16) (Supplementary Figure 1). Consistent with the current studies (Avigdor et al., 2017; Cherniack et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019) in the genomics of MSCs, TP53 mutation was the most common genetic alteration. In addition to TP53, other recurrently mutated genes in breast MSCs were PIK3CA (4/10) and PTEN (2/10); however, in other MSCs, we observed mutations in KMT2D (4/6), MUC16 (3/6), BCLAF1 (2/6), BIRC6 (2/6), and CREBBP (2/6). Additionally, we further searched for common mutations in MSCS from different organs, which may be driver mutations in the tumorigenesis of MSCs. As shown in Figure 1, gene mutations occurring in at least two organs (breast, esophageal, lung, and kidney) were found, and the results also showed that TP53 and KMT2D were the most frequently mutated genes. For KMT2D, which is rarely reported to be associated with MSCs, we further confirmed that the KMT2D gene was specifically mutated in tumors, not in paired normal tissues, by PCR and Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Figure 2). We identified seven somatic KMT2D mutations in the exploratory cohort (n = 16), including three nonsense mutations, two frameshift indels, one missense mutation, and one splice site mutation (Figure 2A, Table 1).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

KMT2D Mutations in the Eight Validation Cohorts

MSCs exhibited frequent KMT2D mutations in the exploratory cohort (n = 16 tumors). Due to the rarity of these diseases, we sought to determine whether KMT2D mutations existed in expanded cohorts. We searched the literature and cBioPortal database with information on KMT2D mutation in MSCs from different organs. As listed in Table 2, six studies and two uterine carcinosarcoma datasets (http://cbioportal.org) containing KMT2D mutation information were available for analysis. The eight cohorts (n = 195) included three cohorts derived from the breast (n = 35 (Ng et al., 2017), n = 28 [2], n = 20 (Ross et al., 2015)), one cohort (Zhang et al., 2019) derived from the liver (n = 8), one cohort (Lu et al., 2018) derived from the esophagus (n = 15), one cohort (Liu et al., 2016) derived from the lung (n = 10), and two cohorts derived from the uterus or ovary [n = 57 (Cherniack et al., 2017), n = 22 (Jones et al., 2014)]. Consistent with our studies, the eight validation cohorts (Table 2) showed that MSCs harbored high TP53 mutations (from 60 to 100%, average, 78%). For KMT2D (Table 2), the mutation rate ranged from 6 to 30% (average, 13%), and the mutation type contained truncation, frameshift, splice and missense mutations. Interestingly, some patients simultaneously showed two or more mutations in KMT2D. In our study, two patients (ID8 and ID 16) showed two mutations in KMT2D with nonsense mutations and frameshift indels (Figure 2A). Consistent with our study, two or more hits on KMT2D were also present in the other three independent cohorts (Figure 2B).

KMT2D Mutations Are Negatively Associated With KMT2D Expression

To establish the relationship between KMT2D mutation status and protein expression, we examined KMT2D expression in the exploratory cohort (n = 16 tumors) by IHC. Interestingly, KMT2D showed robust nuclear expression in patients with no KMT2D mutation (n = 11) (Figures 3A,B), whereas a weak KMT2D signal was detected in patients with a single mutation in KMT2D (n = 3) (Figures 3C,D); moreover, the two cases with double mutations in KMT2D exhibited loss of nuclear KMT2D expression (Figures 3E,F). Our results showed that KMT2D mutations were significantly associated with low expression of KMT2D (Figure 3G).

FIGURE 3

Association Between KMT2D Mutation and Prognosis

The tumor mutation burden (TMB) was defined as the number of nonsynonymous and indel mutations per megabase (Mb). The patients with MSC showed high TMB, ranging from 19 to 257, with a median of 80 (Figure 4A). Notably, there was a tendency for patients with KMT2D mutations to show high TMB, although in this study the difference was not significant (Figure 4A). We further analyzed the relationships between KMT2D and tumor size and prognosis. The results showed that the tumor size in MSC patients with KMT2D mutations was significantly higher than that in patients without KMT2D mutations (p = 0.0035) (Figure 4B). Furthermore, KMT2D mutations were associated with shorter overall survival times (p = 0.0321) (Figure 4C).

FIGURE 4

Discussion

MSCs are rare neoplasms with heterologous histological differentiation that can occur in different organs (Weigelt et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2016; Cherniack et al., 2017; Krings and Chen, 2018; Lu et al., 2018; Park et al., 2020). To identify novel somatically mutated genes in MSCs from different organs, we performed WES on 16 primary MSCs and paired normal DNA. The results showed that in addition to TP53 (13/16), KMT2D (5/16) was a frequently mutated gene. Another eight cohorts (n = 195) diagnosed with MSCs originating from six organs also showed high mutations in KMT2D (6–30%, with an average of 13%). Our finding that KMT2D is somatically mutated in 31% of MSCs and is partially displayed by frameshift, nonsense mutations, and dual mutations strongly implicates KMT2D as a novel pathogenic driver gene in MSCs.

Exome sequencing of 10 cases with breast MSCs confirmed enrichment of TP53 (7/10) and PIK3CA (4/10) (Supplementary Figure 1). Consistent with our results, breast MSCs harbored high TP53 mutations in three independent cohorts (69, 64, and 75%; Table 2). Interestingly, TP53 was more frequently mutated in breast MSCs than in breast cancers. Pereira et al. (Pereira et al., 2016) sequenced 173 genes in 2,433 primary breast tumors, and PIK3CA and TP53 dominated the mutation landscape (40.1 and 35.4%, respectively). Similar results were also described in another cohort (n = 1918, http://cbioportal.org) (Razavi et al., 2018). These results raise the possibility that the mutation of TP53 may be strongly associated with the tumorigenesis of MSCs. In addition to breast MSCs, we found that TP53 and KMT2D were the most frequently mutated genes (6/6 and 4/6, respectively) in MSCs originating from the other three organs (esophagus, lung and kidney) (Figure 1); specifically, each tumor (n = 6) exhibited a TP53 mutation. Moreover, we also found that TP53 in the liver, esophageal, lung, uterine and ovarian MSCs was prone to mutation, and the mutation rate ranged from 60 to 100% (average 84.8%) (Table 2). The KMT2D mutation, which is rarely reported to be involved in MSCs, was frequently detected in our study (5/16) (Table 1). To our knowledge, our study is the first to report that KMT2D is a recurrently mutated gene in MSCs from different organs. Notably, small cell lung cancer exhibits high mutation rates of TP53 and KMT2D. Ross et al. showed that the genomic alteration rates in TP53 and KMT2D were 86 and 17%, respectively, in 98 cases (Ross et al., 2014); in the Hu study, the mutation frequencies for TP53 and KMT2D were 93.4 and 15.6%, respectively, in 122 patients with small cell lung cancer (Hu et al., 2019). TP53 mutants engage in direct cross talk with chromatin regulatory genes (KMT2A, KMT2D and KAT6A), resulting in genome-wide transcription programs (Zhu et al., 2015). Together with our findings, these results indicate that both MSCs and small cell lung cancer have similar mutation rates for TP53 and KMT2D, and the mutation of KMT2D may cooperate with TP53 mutation to drive tumorigenesis in MSCs and small cell lung cancer.

Studies in mouse models highlight the importance of KMT2D in regulating a wide range of biological processes, including embryonic development, cell differentiation, metabolic homeostasis, and cancer (Froimchuk et al., 2017). Pathogenic variants in KMT2D cause autosomal dominant Kabuki syndrome, a disorder characterized by distinctive facial features, intellectual disability, and abnormalities affecting other parts of the body (Cocciadiferro et al., 2018). KMT2D mutations result in an abnormal and nonfunctional lysine-specific methyltransferase 2D enzyme that disrupts its role in histone methylation and impairs proper activation of certain genes, resulting in abnormalities in many of the body’s organs and tissues (Froimchuk et al., 2017). Mutations in the KMT2D gene have been implicated in certain cancers, including medulloblastomas (Dhar et al., 2018), lymphomas (Zhang et al., 2015) and lung cancer (Alam et al., 2020). With this study, we are the first to report that KMT2D is one of the most recurrently mutated genes (5/16) in MSCs originating from different organs (Figure 1). The KMT2D mutations were represented by three nonsense mutations, two frameshift indels, one missense mutation, and one splice site mutation in the exploratory cohort (n = 16 tumors) (Table 1). Interestingly, two patients (ID 8 and ID 16) each showed two mutations in KMT2D, a nonsense mutation and frameshift indel (Figure 2A). Consistent with our results, the eight validation cohorts showed that MSCs harbored frequent KMT2D mutations ranging from 6 to 30% (average of 13%) (Table 2). Two or more mutations of KMT2D in one patient were simultaneously detected in three independent cohorts (Figure 2B). Moreover, we found that KMT2D mutations were negatively associated with KMT2D expression (Figure 3). Frequent KMT2D mutations in MSCs point to their loss of function in pathogenesis and suggest their roles as tumor suppressors. KMT2D loss led to increased DNA damage and mutation burden, chromatin remodeling, intron retention, activation of transposable elements and overall instability at the chromosomal level (Kantidakis et al., 2016). This type of stress can have catastrophic consequences and lead to the formation of cancerous tumors. Consistent with these outcomes, lung-specific loss of KMT2D promotes lung tumorigenesis in mice and upregulates the glycolysis program (Alam et al., 2020). Interestingly, KMT2D-mutant tumors exhibit enhanced immune infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, and KMT2D deficiency sensitizes multiple cancer types to anti-PD1 therapy by augmenting tumor immunogenicity (Wang et al., 2020). In summary, KMT2D is frequently mutated in MSCs from different organs, and KMT2D alteration may act as a driver mutation and provide a basis for anti-PD1 therapy in this rare malignant disease.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically investigate genomic alterations in MSCs derived from different organs. We found that TP53 and KMT2D were the most recurrently mutated genes. In addition, KMT2D alterations presented with nonsense mutations, frameshift indels, missense mutations, and splice site mutations, and some patients harbored double hits on KMT2D. Similar results were also seen in eight validation cohort studies. Furthermore, KMT2D mutations were associated with low expression of KMT2D, large tumor size and unfavorable prognosis. Collectively, these findings lead us to identify KMT2D as a pathogenic driver gene in MSCs derived from different organs, which may lead to appropriate treatments for this rare malignant disease in the future.

References

• 1

  AlamH.TangM.MaitituohetiM.DharS. S.KumarM.HanC. Y.et al (2020). KMT2D Deficiency Impairs Super-enhancers to Confer a Glycolytic Vulnerability in Lung Cancer. Cancer Cell37, 599–617. 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  ArmstrongA. B.WangM.EbleJ. N.MacLennanG. T.MontironiR.TanP.-H.et al (2009). TP53 Mutational Analysis Supports Monoclonal Origin of Biphasic Sarcomatoid Urothelial Carcinoma (Carcinosarcoma) of the Urinary Bladder. Mod. Pathol.22, 113–118. 10.1038/modpathol.2008.176

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  AvigdorB. E.BeierlK.GockeC. D.ZabranskyD. J.CraveroK.Kyker-SnowmanK.et al (2017). Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Indicates Monoclonality with Associated Ductal Carcinoma Component. Clin. Cancer Res.23, 4875–4884. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0108

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  CherniackA. D.ShenH.WalterV.StewartC.MurrayB. A.BowlbyR.et al (2017). Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell31, 411–423. 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  CocciadiferroD.AugelloB.De NittisP.ZhangJ.MandrianiB.MalerbaN.et al (2018). Dissecting KMT2D Missense Mutations in Kabuki Syndrome Patients. Hum. Mol. Genet.27, 3651–3668. 10.1093/hmg/ddy241

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  DharS. S.ZhaoD.LinT.GuB.PalK.WuS. J.et al (2018). MLL4 Is Required to Maintain Broad H3K4me3 Peaks and Super-enhancers at Tumor Suppressor Genes. Mol. Cel70, 825–841. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.04.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  ErsekJ. L.SymanowskiJ. T.HanY.HowardA.DumasK.AhrensW.et al (2020). Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis. Clin. Lung Cancer21, 160–170. 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  FroimchukE.JangY.GeK. (2017). Histone H3 Lysine 4 Methyltransferase KMT2D. Gene627, 337–342. 10.1016/j.gene.2017.06.056

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  GotohO.SugiyamaY.TakazawaY., Kato, K., Tanaka, N., Omatsu, K.et al (2019). Clinically Relevant Molecular Subtypes and Genomic Alteration-independent Differentiation in Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma. Nat. Commun.10, 4965. 10.1038/s41467-019-12985-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  HuJ.WangY.ZhangY.YuY.ChenH.LiuK.et al (2019). Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Small Cell Lung Cancer in Chinese Patients and the Implications for Therapeutic Potential. Cancer Med.8, 4338–4347. 10.1002/cam4.2199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  JonesS.StranskyN.McCordC. L., Cerami, E., Lagowski, J. KellyD.et al (2014). Genomic Analyses of Gynaecologic Carcinosarcomas Reveal Frequent Mutations in Chromatin Remodelling Genes. Nat. Commun.5, 5006. 10.1038/ncomms6006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  KantidakisT.SaponaroM.MitterR.HorswellS.KranzA.BoeingS.et al (2016). Mutation of Cancer driverMLL2 results in Transcription Stress and Genome Instability. Genes Dev.30, 408–420. 10.1101/gad.275453.115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  KringsG.ChenY.-Y. (2018). Genomic Profiling of Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas Reveals Genetic Heterogeneity and Relationship to Ductal Carcinoma. Mod. Pathol.31, 1661–1674. 10.1038/s41379-018-0081-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  LiuX.JiaY.StooplerM. B.ShenY.ChengH.ChenJ.et al (2016). Next-Generation Sequencing of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma Reveals High Frequency of Actionable MET Gene Mutations. Jco34, 794–802. 10.1200/jco.2015.62.0674

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  LuH.YangS.ZhuH.TongX., Xie, F., Qin, J.et al (2018). Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Identified Clinically Actionable Mutations in Patients with Esophageal Sarcomatoid Carcinoma. BMC Cancer18, 251. 10.1186/s12885-018-4159-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  McCart ReedA. E.KalawE.NonesK.BettingtonM.LimM.BennettJ.et al (2019). Phenotypic and Molecular Dissection of Metaplastic Breast Cancer and the Prognostic Implications. J. Pathol.247, 214–227. 10.1002/path.5184

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  NgC. K. Y.PiscuoglioS.GeyerF. C.BurkeK. A.ParejaF.EberleC. A.et al (2017). The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res.23, 3859–3870. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2857

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  ParkJ. J.KelleziO.HamashaR.AliA.AlvaA. S. (2020). Immunotherapy in Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience. Cancer Treat. Res. Commun.25, 100251. 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  PécuchetN.VieiraT.RabbeN.AntoineM.BlonsH.CadranelJ.et al (2017). Molecular Classification of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinomas Suggests New Therapeutic Opportunities. Ann. Oncol.28, 1597–1604. 10.1093/annonc/mdx162

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  PereiraB.ChinS. F.RuedaO. M., Moen Vollan, H.-K., Provenzano, E., Bardwell, H. A.et al (2016). The Somatic Mutation Profiles of 2,433 Breast Cancers Refines Their Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscapes. Nat. Commun.7, 11479. 10.1038/ncomms11479

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  RazaviP.ChangM. T.XuG.BandlamudiC.RossD. S.VasanN.et al (2018). The Genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancers. Cancer Cell34, 427–438. 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  RossJ. S.WangK.ElkadiO. R.TarasenA.FoulkeL.SheehanC. E.et al (2014). Next-generation Sequencing Reveals Frequent Consistent Genomic Alterations in Small Cell Undifferentiated Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Pathol.67, 772–776. 10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202447

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  RossJ. S.BadveS.WangK.SheehanC. E.BoguniewiczA. B.OttoG. A.et al (2015). Genomic Profiling of Advanced-Stage, Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma by Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals Frequent, Targetable Genomic Abnormalities and Potential New Treatment Options. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.139, 642–649. 10.5858/arpa.2014-0200-oa

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  WangG. G.ChowR. D.ZhuL.BaiZ.LupengY.ZhangF.et al (2020). CRISPR-GEMM Pooled Mutagenic Screening Identifies KMT2D as a Major Modulator of Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cancer Discov.10, 1912–1933. 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1448

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  WeigeltB.EberleC.CowellC. F.NgC. K. Y.Reis-FilhoJ. S. (2014). Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: More Than a Special Type. Nat. Rev. Cancer14, 147–148. 10.1038/nrc3637

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  ZhangJ.Dominguez-SolaD.HusseinS.LeeJ.-E.HolmesA. B.BansalM.et al (2015). Disruption of KMT2D Perturbs Germinal Center B Cell Development and Promotes Lymphomagenesis. Nat. Med.21, 1190–1198. 10.1038/nm.3940

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  ZhangX.BaiQ.XuY.WangW.ChenL.HanJ.et al (2019). Molecular Profiling of the Biphasic Components of Hepatic Carcinosarcoma by the Use of Targeted Next‐generation Sequencing. Histopathology74, 944–958. 10.1111/his.13822

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  ZhuJ.SammonsM. A.DonahueG.DouZ.VedadiM.GetlikM.et al (2015). Gain-of-function P53 Mutants Co-opt Chromatin Pathways to Drive Cancer Growth. Nature525, 206–211. 10.1038/nature15251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article