Abstract
Riboswitch RNAs regulate gene expression by conformational changes induced by environmental conditions and specific ligand binding. The guanidine-II riboswitch is proposed to bind the small molecule guanidinium and to subsequently form a kissing loop interaction between the P1 and P2 hairpins. While an interaction was shown for isolated hairpins in crystallization and electron paramagnetic resonance experiments, an intrastrand kissing loop formation has not been demonstrated. Here, we report the first evidence of this interaction in cis in a ligand and Mg2+ dependent manner. Using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and detailed structural information from coarse-grained simulations, we observe and characterize three interconvertible states representing an open and kissing loop conformation as well as a novel Mg2+ dependent state for the guanidine-II riboswitch from E. coli. The results further substantiate the proposed switching mechanism and provide detailed insight into the regulation mechanism for the guanidine-II riboswitch class. Combining single molecule experiments and coarse-grained simulations therefore provides a promising perspective in resolving the conformational changes induced by environmental conditions and to yield molecular insights into RNA regulation.
Introduction
Riboswitches are cis-regulatory elements that are located in the 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) of bacterial mRNA, affecting the expression of the downstream gene. They are generally comprised of an aptamer domain and an expression platform. The aptamer domain is responsible for specific ligand binding, whereas part of the expression platform can form distinct structures that trigger the genetic decision. By structurally coupling the aptamer domain with the expression platform, riboswitches are able to execute their regulatory function. There is a wide spectrum of metabolites that can be bound by the respective aptamer domain, ranging from ions (; Sherlock and Breaker 2017), amino acids (Sudarsan et al., 2003), nucleotides () and cofactors (Winkler et al., 2002) to large biomolecules such as tRNAs (). In general, two functional types of riboswitches can be discriminated: the transcriptional and translational riboswitches. In transcriptional riboswitches the expression platform contains a terminator sequence that halts transcription upon correct folding. In contrast, translational riboswitches contain an anti-Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence (Winkler and Breaker 2003). Sequestering of the SD sequence prevents ribosome binding and thus translation initiation. In both cases ligand binding to the aptamer could either switch gene expression on or off, based on the type of riboswitch. This positive or negative feedback loop allows utilization of specific biosynthetic pathways [such as in the 2′dG riboswitch ()], or elimination of toxic substances [such as the fluoride riboswitch ()].
So far, four classes of riboswitches have been identified that bind the cationic molecule guanidinium (Gdm+): guanidine-I (), -II (Sherlock et al., 2017), -III (Sherlock and Breaker 2017) and -IV (Salvail et al., 2020). The corresponding genes are in most cases involved in Gdm+ detoxification, and code for proteins like guanidine carboxylases or multidrug efflux pumps (e. g., SugE). While guanidine-I and -IV are transcriptionally regulated riboswitches, guanidine-II and -III are proposed to be translational riboswitches. The latter having an additional level of regulation via protection from RNase E degradation (). The guanidine-II riboswitch is the shortest representative of guanidine riboswitches classes, and was named mini-ykkC prior to Gdm+ being identified as the ligand in 2017 (Sherlock et al., 2017). It consists of two GC-rich hairpins termed P1 and P2, both containing a conserved ACGR loop motif. It has been proposed that this class features a translational regulation mechanism because the two hairpins are connected with a linker containing a putative anti-SD sequence (). So far, in-line probing experiments (Sherlock et al., 2017), crystallization (; ; ) and molecular dynamics (Steuer et al., 2021) analyses have suggested a kissing loop formation through canonical CG base pairs upon binding of the ligand Gdm+ to the loop region (Figures 1A,B) associated with a rearrangement of those nucleotides compared to the unbound-like state. This interaction supposedly sequesters the anti-SD sequence, exposing the SD sequence and thus facilitating translation of the downstream gene (Figure 1A). Mg2+ binding sites have been identified in each of the two stems (; Schamber et al., 2021). Crystallization could however only show homo-dimerization of isolated hairpins. Using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) it was shown that RNAs comprising either hairpins P1 or P2 could form homo-as well as heterodimers (Wuebben et al., 2020). Recently, a study combining nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) showed interstrand kissing loop formation in an in vitro environment (Schamber et al., 2021).
FIGURE 1
Until now, there was however no direct evidence that an interaction in cis between the two hairpins can form in a functional RNA (Wuebben et al., 2020) and that this interaction is regulated by ligand binding. To fill this gap, we combined single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) spectroscopy and coarse-grained simulations. Our work allows us to also discuss the limitations and mutual benefits of these two complementary approaches. The results show that the riboswitch aptamer domain can adopt three different conformational states, including a ligand dependent state that involves intrastrand kissing loop formation.
Materials and Methods
Construct Design, Dye Attachment, and FRET Positioning and Screening Software
For this work the wild-type sequence of the E. coli SugE guanidine-II riboswitch aptamer was used (Figure 1C). The construct contained the P1 and P2 hairpin as well as the native linker connecting both hairpins. The 5′ C1 was exchanged with a G to stabilize the hairpin. Labelling sites were chosen at U3 via a C5 amino-allyl modification and the 3′ phosphate with a C6 amino-modifier. For immobilization, a biotin modifier was used at the 5′ end. The sequence was split into a 23mer and 24mer to allow separate labelling.
For FRET efficiency prediction, the FRET positioning and screening software (FPS) () was used. The crystal structure of the E. coli P1 hairpin homodimer [PDB: 5NDI ()] was used as a template, and the FPS-derived FRET efficiency was used only for identification of the kissing-loop conformation accordingly. Since the native stems deviate in their length from this structure, we corrected one helix of this structure for the purpose of the FPS simulations to four nucleotides in order to correctly simulate the native riboswitch RNA hairpins. As parameters for the FPS simulation, we used previously established values (Schmidt et al., 2018): For Cy3, dye radii of 6.8, 3.0, and 1.5 Å, respectively, were used. Cy5 was calculated with 11.0, 3.0, and 1.5 Å, respectively. The 12-atom flexible linkers were described with 22.3 and 4.5 Å for 5′ modification (C5 of amino-allyl uridine), and 27.1 and 4.5 Å for the 3′ modification (starting from the 3′ oxygen). The Förster radius for the Cy3/Cy5 pair was set to 60 Å (). The program was used to calculate the accessible volume clouds as depicted in Figure 1D, as well as the expected FRET efficiencies and average distances between the dyes.
RNA Synthesis: Labelling
Modified RNAs for the FRET construct were purchased in two fragments (Dharmacon) (5′ fragment: Biotin-GU(5-NH2-U) UGC AGG ACG ACC UGC AAA CG, 3′ fragment: P-CCU CUU UUC ACC GGG GAC GGC CCC-C6NH2). 30 nmol of each RNA were ethanol precipitated, and subsequently resuspended in 20 µl freshly prepared 0.1 M NaHCO3 (pH 8.0). Cy3 or Cy5 amine-reactive dyes (Amersham CyDye Mono-Reactive Dye Packs, GE Healthcare) were dissolved in 20 µl DMSO. Labelling was achieved by mixing the two solutions and incubation of the RNA with the respective dye for 90 min (3′ fragment) or 3 h (5′ fragment) at room temperature under light protection. RNA was precipitated and dissolved in 300 µl deprotection buffer (100 mM AcOH adjusted to pH 3.8 with TEMED) and incubated at 60°C for 40 min (3′ fragment) or 2 h (5′ fragment). Deprotected RNA was precipitated, and non-biotinylated RNA was dissolved in 0.1 M TEAA (pH 7.0) and purified via reverse phase chromatography with an Äkta Basic system using a C8 column (Kromasil 100 C8 7 µm 250 × 4.6 mm). A gradient from 100% TEAA buffer to 50% MeCN was applied. Fractions with labelled RNA were collected and precipitated.
RNA Synthesis: Ligation and Purification
The FRET construct was synthesized through splinted ligation of the two fluorophore labelled fragments. All nucleic acid components had a final concentration of 10 µM each. RNA fragments were dissolved in water, heated to 95°C for 2 min and placed on ice. The DNA splint (TGG GGC CGT CCC CGG TGA AAA GAG GCG TTT GCA GGT CGT CCT GCA AAC CTA TAG TGA GTC GTA TTA) and T4 ligase buffer (50 mM TRIS/Cl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 10 mM DTT, pH 7.5) were added and the mixture incubated at 85°C for 3 min. After slowly cooling down T4 DNA ligase (final concentration of 40 U/mL, NEB) was added and the reaction was performed for 2 h at room temperature. 1 U Turbo DNase (Invitrogen) was added and incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and subsequently extracted using phenol/ether extraction and precipitated. The FRET construct containing the desired sequence was separated via denaturing PAGE, eluted and ethanol precipitated.
smFRET Measurements
Microscope slides (quartz) and cover slips were cleaned with nitrogen plasma for 10 min. Channels were made by aligning parafilm stripes on the slide, covering it with the coverslip and heating everything to 80°C for 30 s. Cooled down channels were filled with 1 mg/ml biotin labelled bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) in T50 buffer (10 mM Tris/Cl, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and incubated for 2 min. Channels were then washed with 50 µl of T50 before incubation with 0.2 mg/ml streptavidin in T50 for 2 min. Channels were washed with 50 mM Tris/Cl (pH 7.4) with the respective Mg2+ and Gdm+ concentration. 100 pM RNA was folded in the respective buffer by incubation at 95°C for 2 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. RNA was flushed into the channel for immobilization. Prior to the measurement, the channel was rinsed with imaging buffer [sample conditions in Tris buffer, 10% (w/v) D-(+)-glucose, 80 μg/ml glucose oxidase, 20 μg/ml catalase, and Trolox (saturated)].
An objective-type spinning-spot total internal reflection microscopy setup with an EMCCD camera (iXon, Andor Technology) with 532 nm laser (green laser) excitation with an integration time of 100 ms at 22°C was used for smFRET measurements. This ensures that molecules lacking a Cy3 modification do not contribute to the data collected in these experiments. For histograms 20 frames with green excitation were recorded. For kinetic data and verification of single step photobleaching movies of up to 7 min were recorded.
In order to improve the data basis for our analysis, we used a larger number of short movies (2 s) to calculate FRET efficiencies for histograms. FRET efficiencies were binned to a bin size of 0.05. The donor only peak was fitted with a Gaussian fit, and subtracted from the data. The remaining data was plotted into histograms. For these histograms, three states were fitted with a Gaussian fit using OriginPro 2018b (Northampton). The fractions of the individual states were calculated from the ratios of the area under the individual curves. For kinetic data, traces before photobleaching were manually selected for consistency, anticorrelated dye behaviour, and single-step photobleaching. The selected traces were stitched to a single trace of 50,000 datapoints. Since the number of transitions for each molecule was significantly higher than the number of stitched molecules, this only marginally affects the kinetic information extracted from these stitched traces. In cases where this prerequisite was not fulfilled, we indicated “not determined” (n.d.). Hidden Markov modelling software (HaMMy) () was then applied using a three state model. Fitting the traces with a five state model did not result in additional, discernible FRET states (data not shown). Dwell times for each transition were fitted with an exponential decay and rate constants (k) were calculated using OriginPro 2018b.
Coarse-Grained Simulations
The simulation construct was modeled based on a crystal structure of the E. coli guanidine-II riboswitch P1 stem-loop dimer (PDB: 5NDI) (). One loop was shortened to the length of the wild type P2 stem-loop. Base pairs were mutated to match the FRET construct using Chimera (). The linker between the P1 and P2 stem-loops was modeled using ModeRNA (Rother et al., 2011). The coarse-grained RNA simulations were performed using a three-interaction site model (TIS) developed by Thirumalai and coworkers (; , ; ; ). For our present study, TIS is particularly suited since it is computational efficient allowing us the investigation of folding/unfolding transitions while reproducing the folding thermodynamics with good accuracy (). In the TIS model, the intramolecular attractive interactions are defined based on the residues that appear in the native structure. This description, inherent to all Gō-like models, ensures that the native structure is the minimum energy structure (). Native hydrogen bonds and tertiary stacks in the simulation construct were defined based on the crystal structure of the P1 stem-loop dimer (). In order to capture folding intermediates that are not stabilized by native interactions, non-native secondary structure interactions were included via the base-stacking interactions of consecutive nucleotides and hydrogen-bond interactions between all nucleobases (). A non-interacting adenine was added capping the structure at the 3′-end. The RNA was placed in a cubic box with an edge length of 70 nm. Numerical integration of the equations of motion was performed using the leap-frog algorithm with time step h = 0.05 τ where τ = 50 fs at 298.15 K as in previous work with TIS (). The simulations were performed in the low friction regime dynamics to increase the sampling efficiency of the conformations, in which the viscosity of water was reduced 100 times (). The cut-off for electrostatic interactions was set to 3 nm. Magnesium was included explicitly via the effective Magnesium-phosphate interaction potential derived from RISM theory () . Simulations were performed at six different concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 mM Mg2+. Each concentration was simulated for 1.5 × 109 steps corresponding to 3.75 μs. In total 22.5 μs of simulation time was used. Monovalent ions were included implicitly at a concentration of 50 mM. To compare the simulations to experiments, the FRET efficiency was calculated. Structures from the simulations were backmapped to an atomistic representation. Accessible volumes of the FRET dyes and corresponding mean FRET efficiencies were estimated using avtraj (). Dye parameters were matched to the previously stated FPS parameters. The resulting FRET efficiencies were subsequently binned using the same bin size (0.05) as in the experiments and fitted with the same routine described above. For comparison with experimental data the most probable FRET efficiency of each state is obtained from the maximum of the fitted Gaussian.
Secondary Structure Prediction
For secondary structure predictions, the online folding tools Mfold RNA folding Form version 2.3 (Zuker 2003) and Vienna RNAfold () were used. Structure predictions were performed for both the 47mer RNA sequence with a stabilizing G1 used in this work as well as the native aptamer.
Results
Construct Design and Synthesis
Several crystal structures have shown the formation of a kissing loop interaction involving canonical C-G base pairs between isolated hairpins (; ; ), resulting in homodimeric structures. However, two problems can be envisioned when transferring these findings to functional constructs. First, the two stems in all natural riboswitches have different sequences (Weinberg et al., 2007). Secondly, the two hairpins are linked with a presumably regulatory anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence. It is therefore unclear whether the interactions found in the crystal structures can actually be transferred to the natural riboswitch. Therefore, a linked construct comprised of the native hairpins is required to resolve whether the interaction between P1 and P2 helices can occur in cis.
Based on the available structural information from crystal structures () as well as in-line probing experiments (Sherlock et al., 2017), an RNA FRET construct was designed. For this, a 47mer RNA sequence of the guanidine-II riboswitch complete aptamer region upstream of the E. coli sugE gene was selected (Figure 1C). Fluorophore attachment sites were placed in helical regions of both hairpins expecting them to assume a defined distance upon kissing loop formation, supposedly creating a signature FRET efficiency. A native U of the P1 stem was modified at position C5, and the second modification was introduced at the 3′ phosphate.
In order to identify the expected FRET efficiency of this construct in a potential kissing loop conformation (such as the one in the crystal structure), we modelled the available conformational states for the dyes with the FPS software package. This revealed a FRET efficiency of 0.72 (Figure 1D). Based on these results the RNA fragments were designed, and the construct successfully synthesized. We therefore divided the natural aptamer domain into two fragments corresponding to the 23mer P1 hairpin and the 24mer linker and P2 region (Figure 1C). The 5′ fragment had an additional conjugated biotin to allow immobilization required for smFRET measurements. Fragments were successfully labelled with Cy3 and Cy5 using NHS-chemistry, respectively. The final FRET construct was synthesized via subsequent splinted ligation of the dye-labelled fragments and denaturing PAGE purification of the double labelled RNA (Figure 1E).
Initial smFRET Characterization
Synthesis of this FRET construct now enables investigation whether P1 and P2 interact in cis using smFRET. Initially, we tested the FRET efficiencies and their response to selected Mg2+ ion and Gdm+ ligand conditions. In the absence of both ligand and Mg2+ the majority of molecules resided in a low FRET state (EFRET ≈ 0.38) (Figure 2A). This low FRET state corresponds to a distance between the dyes that is larger than what would be expected for the conformation modelled from the crystal structure. As shown in the following, this state corresponds to an unfolded conformation, which we term the U-state.
FIGURE 2
In presence of 5 mM Mg2+, the riboswitch folds into a high FRET state (EFRET ≈ 0.86) which we designate the M-state (Figure 2B). The M-state has a higher FRET efficiency than expected from FPS calculations based on the crystal structure. This result is presumably not influence by dye attachment sites, since an inversely labeled construct yields a virtually identical FRET distribution (Supplementary Figure S1).
Upon addition of Gdm+ ligand, the equilibrium was shifted to an intermediate FRET efficiency of 0.69 (Figures 2C,D). This FRET value is in excellent agreement with the FPS-modelled distance in the crystal structure of single hairpins in a kissing loop interaction. Therefore, the intermediate FRET conformation is assigned as the K-state. In this experiment the formation of the K-state in the case of 50 mM ligand is seemingly independent of the presence of Mg2+. It is possible that these high concentrations of the cationic molecule Gdm+ are sufficient to emulate the effects of 5 mM divalent Mg2+. However, this might not be the case at higher RNA and/or lower ligand concentrations (Schamber et al., 2021).
To summarize these initial experiments depending on the solution conditions, three distinct FRET states for the guanidine-II riboswitch were identified. For all of these states we verified that the data indeed originated from individual molecules by monitoring single step photobleaching in time resolved experiments (examples shown in Supplementary Figure S2). This strongly suggests that an RNA fold with fluorophore distances as expected for a kissing loop interaction between P1 and P2 is formed in cis within a full-length aptamer construct. Further, a previously uncharacterized M-conformation was identified.
Coarse-Grained Simulations and smFRET Analysis of Mg2+-Dependent Folding
After finding a Mg2+-dependent state, we investigated the response of the riboswitch to changes in the Mg2+ concentration by performing Mg2+ titration experiments while monitoring the abundance of each of the three states. The dark blue histograms in Figure 3A show representative Mg2+ concentrations with U, K or M being the most dominant peaks, respectively. All other measured FRET histograms can be found in the Supplementary Figure S3. After fitting of these data we calculated the distribution of the three states (Figure 3B) and the mean FRET efficiency of each fit (Figure 3C). We found that high Mg2+ concentrations of 5 mM or above lead to stabilization of the M-state in smFRET experiments, while Mg2+ concentrations between 0.5 and 3 mM cause a shift from the U- to the K-state (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3
To further characterize these states, we performed coarse-grained simulations at various Mg2+ concentrations. In agreement with the experiments, the coarse-grained simulations suggest the existence of three different states dependent on the Mg2+. Representative structures of each state were selected from the simulations (Figure 4). The other states are accessible from the K state in these simulations, as evidenced by the time resolved radius of gyration (Supplementary Figure S4).
FIGURE 4
In absence of Mg2+ ions, the linker in the obtained structures is extended. As a result, the P1 and P2 stem-loops are pointing in different directions, and the tetraloop sequences are not in spatial proximity (Figure 4). At 0.5 mM–5 mM Mg2+, we find mainly structures with a native-like kissing loop orientation of the P1 and P2 stem-loops (Figure 4). At 10 mM Mg2+, more compact structures with a different secondary structure are most abundant. While the P1 hairpin remains folded, the P2 stem unfolds and forms new basepairs with the linker containing the putative anti-SD sequence (Figure 4).
We performed secondary structure predictions with two online tools for an independent assessment. Using the sequence used in this work Mfold v2.3 (Zuker 2003) found a structure with P1 and P2 folded equivalent to the structure at 0 mM Mg2+ shown in Figure 4 (Supplementary Figure S5A). When replacing the stabilizing G1 to its native nucleotide additionally to the P1 and P2 conformation another secondary fold is predicted to be more stable by Mfold (Supplementary Figure S5B). This secondary structure is identical to the one obtained from the coarse-grained simulations at 10 mM Mg2+ (Figure 4) providing further evidence for the existence of this novel structure. Furthermore, Vienna RNAfold () also predicts this conformation for our guanidine-II riboswitch RNA (Supplementary Figure S5C).
To assess whether the conformations derived from the simulations and the FRET experiments are representatives of the same state, we calculated the theoretical FRET efficiencies and their distributions from the simulations (Figure 3A (red), Supplementary Figures S6, S7). In the coarse-grained simulations, the native K-state is designed to be the minimum energy structure by including the native contacts of the kissing-loop interaction. At the same time, the coarse-grained model includes non-native interactions and therefore allows us to capture the U-state in the absence of Mg2+ and the M-state at 10 mM Mg2+. Note that in principle different conformations can contribute to the same FRET efficiency and hence to the same state. In particular, in the U-state a variety of different conformations could be distinguished (Supplementary Figure S8), while in the K- and M-state the contributing conformations were similar in structure. Due to the Gō-like nature of the model, the abundance of the conformations in each state does not correspond to an equilibrium distribution. In addition, we find predominantly one conformational state and interconversion between the states within the timescales of our simulation is rare. Therefore, the magnitude of the FRET frequency from simulations and experiments varies as expected (Figure 3A). Moreover, in the coarse-grained simulations a higher Mg2+ concentration is required to shift the system since the Gō-like nature of our model stabilizes the K-state.
Still, the FRET efficiencies of the most probable structure in each state from simulations and experiments (EFRET) can be compared directly. Figures 3A,C show that EFRET from experiments and simulations is in very good agreement over a range of Mg2+ concentrations. This in turn suggests that the structures derived from the coarse-grained simulations and the ones observed in the FRET experiments at different concentrations might be identical, or at least comparable.
These results show that combining coarse-grained simulations and smFRET experiments provides detailed, complementary insights into the response of the riboswitch RNA to different Mg2+ concentrations. They also reveal that a coaxial orientation of the hairpins necessary for the kissing loop conformation is accessible in the absence of the ligand. Increasing Mg2+ concentrations lead to the folding of the riboswitch into an alternative M-conformation. Here, the coarse-grained simulations allow us to resolve the alternative base pairing pattern and the three-dimensional structure.
Analysis of Dynamics: Mg2+ Titration
After identification and structural description of the three states U, K and M we characterized the transitions between these states. To this end, we performed time resolved smFRET measurements and observed the behavior of the molecules over several minutes at different Mg2+ concentrations in the absence of Gdm+. While some of the traces remained in one FRET state throughout the measurement (example in Figure 5A), the majority of molecules showed multiple transitions, in which each of the states was accessible directly from every other state. We isolated FRET data prior to photobleaching for each molecule and stitched these traces together to a single FRET trace up to 50,000 datapoints (Supplementary Figure S9). From these stitched traces, we performed hidden Markov Modelling using the HaMMy software () with a three state model (Figure 5B). We were able to extract kinetic information (Table1) about the fast-transitioning molecules. For this we plotted the dwell times and fitted a mono-exponential function to derive rate constants (Figure 5C).
FIGURE 5
TABLE 1
| Transition | 0 mM | 0.5 mM | 1 mM | 3 mM | 5 mM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kU,K [s−1] | 5.6 ± 0.14 (n = 313) | 5.8 ± 0.16 (n = 626) | 3.2 ± 0.04 (n = 637) | 4.6 ± 0.08 (n = 541) | 4.0 ± 0.07 (n = 366) |
| kK,U [s−1] | 1.1 ± 0.03 (n = 291) | 1.0 ± 0.03 (n = 575) | 1.6 ± 0.03 (n = 511) | 1.5 ± 0.03 (n = 439) | 2.2 ± 0.11 (n = 336) |
| kU,M [s−1] | n.d. (n = 21) | 0.8 ± 0.04 (n = 423) | 1.6 ± 0.04 (n = 339) | 2.0 ± 0.07 (n = 221) | 3.6 ± 0.10 (n = 110) |
| kM,U [s−1] | n.d. (n = 43) | 0.8 ± 0.04 (n = 476) | 0.6 ± 0.03 (n = 466) | 0.8 ± 0.05 (n = 324) | 0.8 ± 0.10 (n = 140) |
| kK,M [s−1] | 0.7 ± 0.05 (n = 73) | 0.6 ± 0.03 (n = 168) | 0.9 ± 0.05 (n = 367) | 1.4 ± 0.05 (n = 315) | 2.2 ± 0.07 (n = 272) |
| kM,K [s−1] | n.d. (n = 51) | 1.2 ± 0.03 (n = 115) | 0.7 ± 0.04 (n = 240) | 0.4 ± 0.03 (n = 212) | 0.6 ± 0.04 (n = 243) |
Transition rates derived from dwell time fits at various Mg2+ concentrations.
In cases where a reliable fit could not be obtained, i.e., due to an insufficient number of transitions (n), the rates were not determined (n.d.).
We found that the transition from the U-state to the K-state was fast, with a rate constant of approximately kU,K = 4.6 s−1 (average over all Mg2+ concentrations). We note that this transition is a reorientation of the two hairpins P1 and P2 rather than opening of any helix, as suggested by the structures from the coarse-grained simulations. For opening the kissing loop, we found slightly slower rates of kK,U between 1.0 and 2.2 s−1. For the formation of the M-conformation a likely Mg2+-dependent behavior from both the U- and the K-state was observed, in which rates increased slightly with Mg2+ concentration (Figure 5 and Table 1). This increase ranged from 0.8 to 3.6 s−1 for kU,M and from 0.6 to 2.2s−1 for kK,M. Refolding into both the U- and K-state starting from the M-state occurred slower in comparison, with no obvious dependence on Mg2+ concentrations for K and U (around kM,U = 0.8 s−1 and kM,K = 0.7 s−1). This slow refolding was also observable in the small number of molecules in the timescale of this analysis especially for the M-state to K-state transition which resulted in limited resolution of the corresponding fits. It is worth noting that transitions from the unfolded conformation into the kissing loop conformation occur on a timescale similar to unfolding of the Mg2+-dependent conformation, despite the latter requiring release of several basepairs within a helix. One possible explanation is that folding into the K-state requires a significant entropic contribution associated with restricting conformational degrees of freedom of the U-state.
Effect of Gdm+ Ligand on Structural Dynamics
It was previously reported that Gdm+ acts as the ligand for this riboswitch class and leads to a kissing loop formation (K-conformation) upon binding to the loops of the P1 and P2 hairpins (Sherlock et al., 2017). After observing the K-state to a certain amount (46% at 1 mM Mg2+) in the absence of the ligand and a stabilization of this conformation (to 66%) at high Gdm+ concentrations of 50 mM (Figure 2), we characterized the ability of P1 and P2 to form a kissing loop orientation in a ligand dependent manner. We chose the intermediate (and likely physiological) Mg2+ concentration of 1 mM (Tyrrell et al., 2013) to perform ligand titrations. Increasing Gdm+ concentrations in the sub-millimolar range did not result in significant shifts between the populations, with 30–41% of the molecules adopting the K-state. Addition of 30 mM Gdm+ however shifted the populations into the K- state (66%) on the expense of both U and M states, confirming a distinct ligand dependence of this conformation (Figures 6A,B and Supplementary Figure S10).
FIGURE 6
The high concentrations of Gdm+ used in this experiment could however also have an unspecific chaotropic effect. To exclude this possibility we therefore repeated this measurement in the presence of 30 mM urea (Figure 6C) instead of Gdm+ to further assess the specificity of ligand binding. In contrast to Gdm+, the same concentrations of urea did not shift the equilibrium towards the K-state, but rather resulted in a destabilization of the RNA as evidenced by an increased and likely broadened U-state population (35% of molecules) (Figure 6D).
In addition to our histogram analysis, we performed experiments to assess the time-resolved FRET behavior of the riboswitch RNA at 1 mM Mg2+ at different ligand concentrations. Again, we found molecules that are interconverting between the three FRET states as shown for one representative example molecule in Figure 7A, which switches between a dynamic M-state and a static K-state. As for the Mg2+ dependence we also calculated the rate constants for all observable transitions in our Gdm+ titration (Figure 7B and Table 2) from the dwell times derived from stitched traces (Supplementary Figure S11). Here, transitions between the U- and K-states are comparable with the data obtained from Mg2+ titration experiments, i.e. with kU,K = 3.9 s−1 and kK,U = 1.3 s−1, respectively. In general, all other observed transition rates were also comparable with the data of the Mg2+ titration in absence of ligand. Within error, we were not able to identify a faithful ligand dependence of any of the fast transitions, with the exception of kU,K, which upon increase of the ligand concentration rose from ≤3.7 s−1 up to 1 mM Gdm+ to 6.4 s−1 at 30 mM Gdm+.
FIGURE 7
TABLE 2
| Transition | 0 | 30 nM | 1 µM | 30 µM | 1 mM | 30 mM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kU,K [s−1] | 3.2 ± 0.04 (n = 737) | 3.5 ± 0.04 (n = 730) | 2.9 ± 0.04 (n = 929) | 3.7 ± 0.07 (n = 934) | 3.7 ± 0.04 (n = 682) | 6.4 ± 0.09 (n = 933) |
| kK,U [s−1] | 1.6 ± 0.03 (n = 729) | 1.0 ± 0.05 (n = 696) | 0.8 ± 0.05 (n = 903) | 1.9 ± 0.03 (n = 846) | 1.2 ± 0.06 (n = 632) | 1.4 ± 0.03 (n = 930) |
| kU,M [s−1] | 1.6 ± 0.04 (n = 79) | 2.4 ± 0.11 (n = 95) | 1.5 ± 0.05 (n = 917) | 1.4 ± 0.05 (n = 215) | 3.3 ± 0.09 (n = 107) | 5.0 ± 0.19 (n = 49) |
| kM,U [s−1] | 0.6 ± 0.03 (n = 86) | 0.3 ± 0.04 (n = 129) | 0.3 ± 0.03 (n = 223) | 0.4 ± 0.03 (n = 303) | 0.4 ± 0.04 (n = 157) | 0.6 ± 0.11 (n = 51) |
| kK,M [s−1] | 0.9 ± 0.05 (n = 71) | 0.8 ± 0.05 (n = 143) | 0.7 ± 0.06 (n = 162) | 1.0 ± 0.07 (n = 428) | 1.5 ± 0.08 (n = 402) | n.d. (n = 26) |
| kM,K [s−1] | 0.7 ± 0.04 (n = 64) | 0.2 ± 0.03 (n = 109) | 0.2 ± 0.02 (n = 135) | 0.3 ± 0.02 (n = 340) | 0.4 ± 0.02 (n = 353) | n.d. (n = 23) |
Transition rates derived from dwell time fits at various Gdm+ concentrations at 1 mM Mg2+.
In cases where a reliable fit could not be obtained, i.e. due to a low number of transitions (n), the rates were not determined (n.d.).
This analysis can solely characterize fast dynamic molecules and does not include slow refolding or molecules with a stable conformation (e. g., ligand stabilization) due to the timescales accessible in our experiments. As can be seen in Figure 7A, we do however observe some molecules that transiently adopt the K-state for an extended period of time (>∼20 s). In addition to that, all of the data sets contained a limited number of molecules that adopted a particular state (U, K, or M) and showed no transitions between states for the duration of the observation (termed “static molecules”). Therefore, we cannot definitively state whether the molecules used for the fast dynamics in Table 2 necessarily have a Gdm+ molecule bound.
Discussion
Using retrosynthetic splitting, we successfully designed and synthesized a smFRET construct for analysis of individual guanidine-II riboswitch RNA aptamer domain molecules. This RNA showed a distinct and reversible response to binding of both Mg2+ and Gdm+ ions and folding into three discernible states (Unfolded, Kissing loop orientation, and Mg2+ dependent) in both smFRET experiments and coarse-grained simulations.
In our smFRET experiments we find an intermediate FRET efficiency state (K-state). This FRET state is accessible without ligand but is strongly stabilized with increasing Gdm+ as would be expected for the kissing interaction forming RNA fold according to literature (; ; Sherlock et al., 2017). FRET value prediction derived from FPS-based modelling of the crystal structure () closely matches our experimental data. This strongly supports that we observe a kissing loop conformation in form of the K-state. Since our methodological approach can robustly identify signals from individual molecules via single molecule photobleaching, this is a very strong indication that the interaction between P1 and P2 helices can indeed occur in cis. For further support we conducted coarse-grained simulations in absence of the Gdm+ ligand. At 0.5 mM–3 mM Mg2+, where the K-state is the most populated in smFRET measurements, the simulated molecules also fold into the kissing loop orientation. In addition to the structural description, experimental FRET values of the K-state and those calculated from the simulated structures are in good agreement, even though several factors affect accuracy of these smFRET-derived distances (). In remarkable consistence within the Mg2+ titration it showcases how a combined approach of smFRET and coarse-grained simulations can link FRET distributions to structural information.
In the model of guanidine-II riboswitch regulation with an opening and closing of the kissing loop (Figure 1A) a larger distance of the hairpins is expected in an open conformation in the absence of ligand. smFRET data indeed suggest an RNA fold with a larger distance than the K-state, as evidenced by a low FRET efficiency in an environment absent of both Mg2+ and Gdm+ (U-state). Coarse-grained simulations confirm this FRET state to be the open conformation with consistency of theoretical to experimental FRET efficiencies under the same conditions. It furthermore structurally characterizes the open U-RNA conformation with the formation of both hairpins P1 and P2, but no interaction between them, but rather separated by an extended linker.
Using smFRET, we also experimentally describe the dynamic behaviour of the guanidine-II riboswitch. Fast transitions between the FRET states that were identified as the kissing interaction (K-state) and the open conformation (U-state) are found. In these, rates from the K- to the U-state are slightly slower than from U- to K-state. This is in agreement with possible hydrogen bonds between the loop CGs of both hairpins being formed even in transient conformations. This leads to the conclusion that we are able to observe the reorientation of the pre-formed hairpins toggling around the flexible linker. No unambiguous Gdm+ dependence was detected for the transition kinetics of this freely moving RNAs. Even though smFRET is not able to distinguish whether the molecules accessible for dynamics analysis have ligand bound, titration of Gdm+ results in a stepwise ligand-dependent stabilization of the kissing state in FRET histograms. In addition to dynamically reorienting molecules some other molecules adopt a stable FRET state for an extended period of time. The change in FRET histograms with increasing Gdm+ concentrations might be explained with a higher fraction of molecules stabilized in a static K-state temporarily losing the ability of reorientation. For ligand binding, an increase of folding from the U into the K state requires very high (30 mM) concentration of ligand. While the Kd for this RNA is generally high [300 µM (Sherlock et al., 2017)], this points to an even higher concentration that is required for full stability of the kissing loop interaction. Since we also observe the kissing orientation in absence of the native ligand Gdm+, we cannot definitively identify whether Gdm+ ligand binding induces the kissing loop interaction (“induced fit”), or whether binding of the ligand merely stabilizes molecules that have already adopted a kissing loop orientation (“conformational selection”).
Unexpected from any published model of the guanidine-II class riboswitch, further increasing the Mg2+ concentration in our smFRET Mg2+ titration in absence of ligand leads to an even higher FRET efficiency than the K-state. This state is kinetically favored by Mg2+ with increasing rate constants of M-state formation with increasing Mg2+. Interestingly, the structure described by the simulations at 10 mM Mg2+ concentrations is fully consistent with the measured FRET values even in absence of any other, orthogonal a priori structural knowledge furthermore underlining the importance of a combined methodological approach. Nevertheless, this conformation is supported by independent secondary structure prediction. The M-conformation exhibits a distinctly different secondary structure and base pairing pattern for the shorter P2 hairpin, binding back to the linker with the P1 formed natively. The slow rate constants exiting this state could in principle be rationalized by these structural information as it presumably requires breaking eight base pairs. Taken together we characterize a novel Mg2+-dependent RNA fold that is in equilibrium with the U- and K-conformation. These results suggest that the RNA requires a certain window of Mg2+ concentrations that facilitate folding into the kissing loop structure in order to be able to respond to environmental influences.
The M-structure is also in agreement with other data from in-line probing experiments (Sherlock et al., 2017), which at high (20 mM) Mg2+ concentrations show a rather low cleavage intensity of the P2 loop for the E. coli specific RNA even in absence of ligand compared to cleavage of its P1 loop or P2s of other representatives of the guanidine-II riboswitch class. In this study, the authors found increased cleavage of the linker after kissing loop formation. The in-line probing in absence of Gdm+ likely reports an equilibrium between U- and M-conformation rather than only the M-structure, which would be consistent with the equilibrium in the smFRET experiments reported here. Differences in cleavage intensities, i.e. for the P1 and P2 stems, in in-line probing data for the E. coli riboswitch could therefore also be explained with the structural information from our simulations. The Mg2+-dependent RNA structure may be a feature specific to the sequence of this riboswitch aptamer in E. coli, and therefore emphasizes the importance of a comparison of data points obtained at different Mg2+ concentrations. Since the state occurs at elevated Mg2+ concentrations and to a smaller extent also at near-physiological Mg2+ concentrations, an unambiguous judgment on a possible regulatory relevance in vivo of this structure is not possible. As can be seen in Figure 4, the anti-SD-sequence would be inaccessible in this conformation, since it is interacting with a part of the sequence that is otherwise involved in formation of the P2 hairpin.
With regard to the Mg2+ titration, a consistent picture emerges from our combined approach of smFRET experiments and coarse-grained simulations. While smFRET experiments are routinely employed to characterize the Mg2+-dependent folding of RNAs (; Steiner et al., 2008; ; ; ) and in particular riboswitches (; Warhaut et al., 2017; ; Warnasooriya et al., 2019), the combined approach used here allows us to provide a more comprehensive view. The quantitative agreement between the maximum efficiencies of each state from simulations and experiments highlights the compatibility of both approaches despite possible limitations in the time scale accessible to the simulations. In particular, the simulations complement the experiments by providing molecular insight into the base pairing pattern and the three-dimensional structures at different Mg2+ concentrations.
The comparison of simulations and smFRET data at different Mg2+ concentrations and the presence of the M-state also show that a near-physiological range of Mg2+ ion concentrations (Tyrrell et al., 2013) is required for the capacity for efficient folding into the suggested functional K state. The K state in turn is significantly stabilized by ligand binding, confirming the functional relevance of our analysis. This also for the first time experimentally directly demonstrates that the functionally relevant interaction between the two hairpins P1 and P2 occurs in cis in a ligand-dependent manner.
The integration of single-molecule and simulation data presented in this study has several limitations. Most prominent, as noted above, are the different timescales accessible to the two methods. While FRET experiments are possible in the (sub-)microsecond range (Schuler and Hofmann 2013; ), simulation time is limited by computing time. This is remedied by using models with lower resolution and coarse-grained models are particularly suited to investigate large conformational changes that are out of reach for atomistic simulations. Still, the accuracy of the predictions can be limited by shortcomings of the empiric interaction potential of the model. A close comparison to experimental data, as presented here, is therefore particularly useful to validate coarse-grained models and to assess possible limitations. At the same time, the slow (second timescale) conformational changes observed by smFRET are certainly inaccessible to straight forward simulations techniques. Conversely very fast dynamics can be closely followed using simulations while they would inevitably be averaged out during standard smFRET measurements. Using restraints from only one FRET pair (i.e., using only one distance vector) limits the information available for structural analysis of any given molecule. This is hampered even further by several assumptions dealing with uncertainties in calculation of FRET efficiencies (). For this very reason, it is impossible to decipher any structure solely from FRET restraints. In several exemplary studies, this is usually mitigated by either additional labeling sites (Stone et al., 2007; ; Warhaut et al., 2017; St-Pierre et al., 2021), the use of ligand-specific conformational changes, and construct size. On the spectroscopic side, FRET is inherently limited by several experimental uncertainties, including dye mobility (; Schmidt et al., 2018). This also translates into assumptions that go into the treatment of dye linkers for FPS (; ) or coarse-grained simulations. Finally, the concentrations used in single-molecule experiments may not be compatible with structural biology approaches or simulations (Schamber et al., 2021), as can be seen in the experiments described above.
In summary, combining coarse-grained simulations and experiments has proven particularly useful to investigate conformational changes in biomolecules (). The coarse-grained model by Hyeon and Thirumlai () is particularly suited to investigate large conformational changes of the guanidine riboswitch in response to changes in the Mg2+ concentration. On the other hand, smFRET experiments give complementary information and are well established to investigate conformational changes in response to ligand binding and buffer conditions (; Vieweger et al., 2015; Yadav et al., 2022). The combined approach presented here allowed us to validate the coarse-grained model further and to complement the FRET experiments by structural insights into the conformational changes.
Conclusion
In summary, smFRET analysis and simulations of the full-length guanidine-II riboswitch aptamer domain from E. coli shows that the RNA can adopt three distinct states which are responsive to ligand as well as to Mg2+ concentration. In close agreement between single molecule experiments and coarse-grained simulations, we find three interconvertible states: An unfolded, open state, a novel Mg2+-dependent state, and the presumably functional kissing loop interaction state.
Our results show that combining coarse-grained simulations and single-molecule FRET experiments provides complementary and detailed insights into the conformational changes induced by environmental conditions.
In light of the proposed translation regulation properties of this riboswitch, our findings are also in excellent agreement with existing data from other methodological approaches (; ; Sherlock et al., 2017; Wuebben et al., 2020). Our results further provide the first direct evidence of the ligand-dependent kissing loop orientation in cis for the guanidine-II riboswitch.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
NS and MH designed the study. CF performed smFRET experiments. SF and NS performed coarse-grained simulations. All authors analyzed and discussed the data and contributed to writing the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the DFG (CRC902 to MH and SF, Emmy Noether Programme, grant no. 315221747 to NS). CF is supported by a fellowship from Stiftung Polytechnische Gesellschaft Frankfurt.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Harald Schwalbe for critical discussion and constant support, Josef Wachtveitl, Anna Wacker, and Tatjana Schamber for critical discussions, and Mike Heilemann for access to instrumentation. NS and SF thank Dave Thirumalai, Naoto Hori and Hung T. Nguyen for fruitful discussions and support with TIS. LOEWE CSC and GOETHE HLR are acknowledged for supercomputing access. A previous version of this study has been deposited at bioRxiv (doi: 10.1101/2021.04.25.44019).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.826505/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbeH.GoN. (1981). Noninteracting Local-Structure Model of Folding and Unfolding Transition in Globular Proteins. II. Application to Two-Dimensional Lattice Proteins. Biopolymers20, 1013–1031. 10.1002/bip.1981.360200512
2
BakerJ. L.SudarsanN.WeinbergZ.RothA.StockbridgeR. B.BreakerR. R. (2012). Widespread Genetic Switches and Toxicity Resistance Proteins for Fluoride. Science335, 233–235. 10.1126/science.1215063
3
BisariaN.GreenfeldM.LimouseC.PavlichinD. S.MabuchiH.HerschlagD. (2016). Kinetic and Thermodynamic Framework for P4-P6 RNA Reveals Tertiary Motif Modularity and Modulation of the Folding Preferred Pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.113, E4956–E4965. 10.1073/pnas.1525082113
4
BreakerR. R.AtilhoR. M.MalkowskiS. N.NelsonJ. W.SherlockM. E. (2017). The Biology of Free Guanidine as Revealed by Riboswitches. Biochemistry56, 345–347. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01269
5
DenesyukN. A.ThirumalaiD. (2013). Coarse-grained Model for Predicting RNA Folding Thermodynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B117, 4901–4911. 10.1021/jp401087x
6
DenesyukN. A.ThirumalaiD. (2015). How Do Metal Ions Direct Ribozyme Folding?Nat. Chem7, 793–801. 10.1038/nchem.2330
7
DimuraM.PeulenT. O.HankeC. A.PrakashA.GohlkeH.SeidelC. A. (2016). Quantitative FRET Studies and Integrative Modeling Unravel the Structure and Dynamics of Biomolecular Systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.40, 163–185. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.012
8
GansenA.FelekyanS.KühnemuthR.LehmannK.TóthK.SeidelC. A. M.et al (2018). High Precision FRET Studies Reveal Reversible Transitions in Nucleosomes between Microseconds and Minutes. Nat. Commun.9, 4628. 10.1038/s41467-018-06758-1
9
GreenN. J.GrundyF. J.HenkinT. M. (2010). The T Box Mechanism: tRNA as a Regulatory Molecule. FEBS Lett.584, 318–324. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.056
10
HengesbachM.KimN.-K.FeigonJ.StoneM. D. (2012). Single-molecule FRET Reveals the Folding Dynamics of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Domain. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 5876–5879. 10.1002/anie.201200526
11
HolmstromE. D.PolaskiJ. T.BateyR. T.NesbittD. J. (2014). Single-Molecule Conformational Dynamics of a Biologically Functional Hydroxocobalamin Riboswitch. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 16832–16843. 10.1021/ja5076184
12
HoneycuttJ. D.ThirumalaiD. (1992). The Nature of Folded States of Globular Proteins. Biopolymers32, 695–709. 10.1002/bip.360320610
13
HoriN.DenesyukN. A.ThirumalaiD. (2016). Salt Effects on the Thermodynamics of a Frameshifting RNA Pseudoknot under Tension. J. Mol. Biol.428, 2847–2859. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.002
14
HuangL.WangJ.LilleyD. M. J. (2017). The Structure of the Guanidine-II Riboswitch. Cell Chem. Biol.24, 695–702. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.05.014
15
HuangL.WangJ.WilsonT. J.LilleyD. M. J. (2019). Structure-guided Design of a High-Affinity Ligand for a Riboswitch. RNA25, 423–430. 10.1261/rna.069567.118
16
HyeonC.ThirumalaiD. (2005). Mechanical Unfolding of RNA Hairpins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 6789–6794. 10.1073/pnas.0408314102
17
IqbalA.ArslanS.OkumusB.WilsonT. J.GiraudG.NormanD. G.et al (2008). Orientation Dependence in Fluorescent Energy Transfer between Cy3 and Cy5 Terminally Attached to Double-Stranded Nucleic Acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 11176–11181. 10.1073/pnas.0801707105
18
KalininS.PeulenT.SindbertS.RothwellP. J.BergerS.RestleT.et al (2012). A Toolkit and Benchmark Study for FRET-Restrained High-Precision Structural Modeling. Nat. Methods9, 1218–1225. 10.1038/nmeth.2222
19
KimJ. N.RothA.BreakerR. R. (2007). Guanine Riboswitch Variants from Mesoplasma Florum Selectively Recognize 2′-deoxyguanosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 16092–16097. 10.1073/pnas.0705884104
20
KobitskiA. Y.HengesbachM.Seidu-LarryS.DammertzK.ChowC. S.van AerschotA.et al (2011). Single-Molecule FRET Reveals a Cooperative Effect of Two Methyl Group Modifications in the Folding of Human Mitochondrial tRNALys. Chem. Biol.18, 928–936. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.03.016
21
KoculiE.HyeonC.ThirumalaiD.WoodsonS. A. (2007). Charge Density of Divalent Metal Cations Determines RNA Stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129, 2676–2682. 10.1021/ja068027r
22
LambertM. N.HoerterJ. A. H.PereiraM. J. B.WalterN. G. (2005). Solution Probing of Metal Ion Binding by helix 27 from Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. RNA11, 1688–1700. 10.1261/rna.2940705
23
LernerE.BarthA.HendrixJ.AmbroseB.BirkedalV.BlanchardS. C.et al (2021). FRET-based Dynamic Structural Biology: Challenges, Perspectives and an Appeal for Open-Science Practices. Elife10. 10.7554/eLife.60416
24
LorenzR.BernhartS. H.Höner Zu SiederdissenC.TaferH.FlammC.StadlerP. F.et al (2011). ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol.6 (1–14), 26. 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26
25
MandalM.BreakerR. R. (2004). Adenine Riboswitches and Gene Activation by Disruption of a Transcription Terminator. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 29–35. 10.1038/nsmb710
26
ManzC.KobitskiA. Y.SamantaA.KellerB. G.JäschkeA.NienhausG. U. (2017). Single-molecule FRET Reveals the Energy Landscape of the Full-Length SAM-I Riboswitch. Nat. Chem. Biol.13, 1172–1178. 10.1038/nchembio.2476
27
McCluskeyK.BoudreaultJ.St-PierreP.Perez-GonzalezC.ChauvierA.RizziA.et al (2019). Unprecedented Tunability of Riboswitch Structure and Regulatory Function by Sub-millimolar Variations in Physiological Mg2+. Nucleic Acids Res.47, 6478–6487. 10.1093/nar/gkz316
28
McKinneyS. A.JooC.HaT. (2006). Analysis of Single-Molecule FRET Trajectories Using Hidden Markov Modeling. Biophysical J.91, 1941–1951. 10.1529/biophysj.106.082487
29
MurphyM. C.RasnikI.ChengW.LohmanT. M.HaT. (2004). Probing Single-Stranded DNA Conformational Flexibility Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Biophysical J.86, 2530–2537. 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74308-8
30
NguyenH. T.HoriN.ThirumalaiD. (2019). Theory and Simulations for RNA Folding in Mixtures of Monovalent and Divalent Cations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.116, 21022–21030. 10.1073/pnas.1911632116
31
PettersenE. F.GoddardT. D.HuangC. C.CouchG. S.GreenblattD. M.MengE. C.et al (2004). UCSF Chimera?A Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis. J. Comput. Chem.25, 1605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084
32
ReissC. W.StrobelS. A. (2017). Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-II Riboswitch. RNA23, 1338–1343. 10.1261/rna.061804.117
33
RichardsJ.BelascoJ. G. (2021). Widespread Protection of RNA Cleavage Sites by a Riboswitch Aptamer that Folds as a Compact Obstacle to Scanning by RNase E. Mol. Cell81, 127–138. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.025
34
RotherM.RotherK.PutonT.BujnickiJ. M. (2011). ModeRNA: a Tool for Comparative Modeling of RNA 3D Structure. Nucleic Acids Res.39, 4007–4022. 10.1093/nar/gkq1320
35
SalvailH.BalajiA.YuD.RothA.BreakerR. R. (2020). Biochemical Validation of a Fourth Guanidine Riboswitch Class in Bacteria. Biochemistry59, 4654–4662. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00793
36
SchamberT.BinasO.SchlundtA.WackerA.SchwalbeH. (2021). Characterization of Structure and Dynamics of the Guanidine‐II Riboswitch from Escherichia coli by NMR Spectroscopy and Small‐Angle X‐ray Scattering (SAXS). Chembiochem23. 10.1002/cbic.202100564
37
SchmidtA.AltincekicN.GustmannH.WachtveitlJ.HengesbachM. (2018). The Protein Microenvironment Governs the Suitability of Labeling Sites for Single-Molecule Spectroscopy of RNP Complexes. ACS Chem. Biol.13, 2472–2483. 10.1021/acschembio.8b00348
38
SchulerB.HofmannH. (2013). Single-molecule Spectroscopy of Protein Folding Dynamics-Expanding Scope and Timescales. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.23, 36–47. 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.10.008
39
SherlockM. E.BreakerR. R. (2017). Biochemical Validation of a Third Guanidine Riboswitch Class in Bacteria. Biochemistry56, 359–363. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01271
40
SherlockM. E.MalkowskiS. N.BreakerR. R. (2017). Biochemical Validation of a Second Guanidine Riboswitch Class in Bacteria. Biochemistry56, 352–358. 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01270
41
St-PierreP.ShawE.JacquesS.DalgarnoP. A.Perez-GonzalezC.Picard-JeanF.et al (2021). A Structural Intermediate Pre-organizes the Add Adenine Riboswitch for Ligand Recognition. Nucleic Acids Res.49, 5891–5904. 10.1093/nar/gkab307
42
SteinerM.KarunatilakaK. S.SigelR. K. O.RuedaD.2008. Single-molecule Studies of Group II Intron Ribozymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105:13853, 13858. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804034105
43
SteuerJ.KukharenkoO.RiedmillerK.HartigJ. S.PeterC. (2021). Guanidine-II Aptamer Conformations and Ligand Binding Modes through the Lens of Molecular Simulation. Nucleic Acids Res.49, 7954–7965. 10.1093/nar/gkab592
44
StoneM. D.MihalusovaM.O’ConnorC. M.PrathapamR.CollinsK.ZhuangX. (2007). Stepwise Protein-Mediated RNA Folding Directs Assembly of Telomerase Ribonucleoprotein. Nature446, 458–461. 10.1038/nature05600
45
SudarsanN.WickiserJ. K.NakamuraS.EbertM. S.BreakerR. R. (2003). An mRNA Structure in Bacteria that Controls Gene Expression by Binding Lysine. Genes Dev.17, 2688–2697. 10.1101/gad.1140003
46
TyrrellJ.McGinnisJ. L.WeeksK. M.PielakG. J. (2013). The Cellular Environment Stabilizes Adenine Riboswitch RNA Structure. Biochemistry52, 8777–8785. 10.1021/bi401207q
47
ViewegerM.HolmstromE. D.NesbittD. J. (2015). Single-Molecule FRET Reveals Three Conformations for the TLS Domain of Brome Mosaic Virus Genome. Biophys. J.109, 2625–2636. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.006
48
WarhautS.MertinkusK. R.HöllthalerP.FürtigB.HeilemannM.HengesbachM.et al (2017). Ligand-modulated Folding of the Full-Length Adenine Riboswitch Probed by NMR and Single-Molecule FRET Spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 5512–5522. 10.1093/nar/gkx110
49
WarnasooriyaC.LingC.BelashovI. A.SalimM.WedekindJ. E.ErmolenkoD. N. (2019). Observation of preQ1-II Riboswitch Dynamics Using Single-Molecule FRET. RNA Biol.16, 1086–1092. 10.1080/15476286.2018.1536591
50
WeinbergZ.BarrickJ. E.YaoZ.RothA.KimJ. N.GoreJ.et al (2007). Identification of 22 Candidate Structured RNAs in Bacteria Using the CMfinder Comparative Genomics Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res.35, 4809–4819. 10.1093/nar/gkm487
51
WinklerW. C.BreakerR. R. (2003). Genetic Control by Metabolite-Binding Riboswitches. Chembiochem4, 1024–1032. 10.1002/cbic.200300685
52
WinklerW.NahviA.BreakerR. R. (2002). Thiamine Derivatives Bind Messenger RNAs Directly to Regulate Bacterial Gene Expression. Nature419, 952–956. 10.1038/nature01145
53
WuebbenC.VicinoM. F.MuellerM.SchiemannO. (2020). Do the P1 and P2 Hairpins of the Guanidine-II Riboswitch Interact?Nucleic Acids Res.48, 10518–10526. 10.1093/nar/gkaa703
54
YadavR.WidomJ. R.ChauvierA.WalterN. G. (2022). An Anionic Ligand Snap-Locks a Long-Range Interaction in a Magnesium-Folded Riboswitch. Nat. Commun.13, 207. 10.1038/s41467-021-27827-y
55
ZukerM. (2003). Mfold Web Server for Nucleic Acid Folding and Hybridization Prediction. Nucleic Acids Res.31, 3406–3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595
Summary
Keywords
single-molecule FRET, coarse-grained simulations, riboswitch, guanidine-II riboswitch, RNA dynamics
Citation
Fuks C, Falkner S, Schwierz N and Hengesbach M (2022) Combining Coarse-Grained Simulations and Single Molecule Analysis Reveals a Three-State Folding Model of the Guanidine-II Riboswitch. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:826505. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.826505
Received
30 November 2021
Accepted
21 March 2022
Published
19 April 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Jinwei Zhang, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States
Reviewed by
Jason Stagno, National Cancer Institute at Frederick (NIH), United States
Yu Liu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Fuks, Falkner, Schwierz and Hengesbach.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Martin Hengesbach, hengesbach@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de
This article was submitted to Structural Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.