Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae is an encapsulated gram-negative bacterium and a significant human pathogen. The capsular polysaccharide (CPS) is essential for virulence and a target antigen for vaccines. Although widespread introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) has significantly reduced disease, the prevalence of non-vaccine serotypes has increased. On the basis of the CPS, S. pneumoniae serogroup 10 comprises four main serotypes 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10F; as well as the recently identified 10D. As it is the most prevalent, serotype 10A CPS has been included as a vaccine antigen in the next generation PCVs. Here we use molecular modeling to provide conformational rationales for the complex cross-reactivity reported between serotypes 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10F anti-sera. Although the highly mobile phosphodiester linkages produce very flexible CPS, shorter segments are conformationally defined, with exposed -D-galactofuranose ( DGalf) side chains that are potential antibody binding sites. We identify four distinct conformational epitopes for the immunodominant DGalf that assist in rationalizing the complex asymmetric cross-reactivity relationships. In particular, we find that strongly cross-reactive serotypes share common epitopes. Further, we show that human intelectin-1 has the potential to bind the exposed exocyclic 1,2-diol of the terminal DGalf in each serotype; the relative accessibility of three- or six-linked DGalf may play a role in the strength of the innate immune response and hence serotype disease prevalence. In conclusion, our modeling study and relevant serological studies support the inclusion of serotype 10A in a vaccine to best protect against serogroup 10 disease.
1 Introduction
S. pneumoniae is an encapsulated gram-negative bacterium and an important human pathogen responsible for significant disease and mortality, especially in children under five (). The capsular polysaccharide (CPS) is essential for virulence and an important target antigen for vaccines (Moreau and Schulz, 2000; ). Although 100 different serotypes have been identified, most disease is caused by a subset of pathogenic serotypes (). Vaccines against the CPS of S. pneumoniae have been developed either as a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) or a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV)—polysaccharide conjugated to a carrier protein (). Unlike polysaccharide vaccines, the glycoconjugate vaccines induce a T cell dependent immune response and are effective in young children; the age group highly susceptible to infections (Lindberg, 1999). This has led to the licensure of PCVs targeting, initially, seven (PCV7, serotypes 4, 6B, 9 V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F), then ten (PCV10, PCV7 plus serotypes 1, 5, and 7F), and 13 (PCV13, PCV10 plus serotypes 3, 6A, and 19A) serotypes.
Widespread introduction of PCVs has significantly reduced the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) due to vaccine serotypes (Wahl et al., 2018). However, increased prevalence of non-vaccine serotypes (due to serotype replacement as well as different geographical and socio-economic vaccination programs and prevalence of serotypes) means that IPD is still a leading cause of lower respiratory infection morbidity and mortality (; ; Wasserman et al., 2021). This necessitated the development of the third generation of PCVs, with higher serotype valency and protection against the emerging serotypes (). A PCV15 vaccine (PCV13 plus serotypes 22F and 33F) and a PCV20 vaccine (PCV15 plus serotypes 8, 10A, 11A, 12F, and 15B) have been licensed and higher valency vaccines such PCV24 (PCV20 plus serotypes 2, 9N, 17F, and 20) and PCV30 are in development (; ; ).
The epidemiology of serogroup 10 varies quite significantly across different geographical regions, with Pn10A considered the most prevalent, followed by Pn10B, with Pn10C and Pn10F occasionally isolated but not considered a major burden of disease (; ; ; Messaoudi et al., 2016; Wouters et al., 2019). The prevalent serotype 10A is present in PPV23 and targeted for inclusion in the third generation PCVs: in PCV20 and PCV24 (; Yang et al., 2011; McGuinness et al., 2021; ).
The literature reports considerable cross-reactivity within S. pneumoniae serogroup 10: between serotypes 10A (Pn10A), 10B (Pn10B), 10C (Pn10C), and 10F (Pn10F), summarized in Figure 1 (; Yang et al., 2011). Specifically, serotype-specific rabbit antisera ( Pn) raised against one serotype recognized the CPS of the other serotypes, albeit with a lower affinity (). These data show some puzzling asymmetry, as follows. Strong reciprocal cross-reactivity was observed between Pn10A and Pn10B; as well as between Pn10C and Pn10F. Then, while Pn10A and Pn10B show strong cross-reactivity with Pn10C, the reciprocal cross-reactivity of Pn10C with these serotypes is weaker. Similarly, while Pn10A and Pn10B show moderate cross-reactivity with Pn10F, the reciprocal cross-reactivity of Pn10F is even weaker. The reasons for this asymmetry are unclear. Little information on the cross-reactivity and prevalence of the recently identified serotype 10D (Pn10D) is available ().
FIGURE 1
The repeating unit (RU) structures of the four main capsular polysaccharides in serogroup 10 (Table 1; Figure 2) contain the sugars -D-galactofuranose ( DGalf), -D-galactopyranose ( DGal), N-acetyl--D-galactosamine ( DGalNAc), -D-galactopyranose ( DGal), and D-ribitol-5-phosphate (Rib-ol-5P), (Yang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2011;
TABLE 1
| Pn10A | [→5) DGalf (1→3) DGalp (1→4)[DGalf (1→3)][DGalp (1→6)] DGalpNAc (1→3) DGalp (1→2)DRib-ol-5P(P→] |
| Pn10B | [→5) DGalf (1→3) DGalp (1→4)[DGalf (1→3)] DGalpNAc (1→3) DGalp (1→4)DRib-ol-5P(P→] |
| Pn10C | [→5) DGalf (1→3) DGalp (1→4)[DGalf (1→6)] DGalpNAc (1→3) DGalp (1→2)DRib-ol-5P(P→] |
| Pn10F | [→5) DGalf (1→3) DGalp (1→4)[DGalf (1→6)] DGalpNAc (1→3) DGalp (1→4)DRib-ol-5P(P→] |
| Pn10D | [→6) DGlcp (1→3) DGlcp (1→4)[DGalf (1→3)][DGalp (1→6)] DGalpNAc (1→3) DGalp (1→1)DRib-ol-5P(P→] |
Line structures of S. pneumoniae repeating units for serogroup 10 CPSs, side groups in bold.
FIGURE 2

S. pneumoniae serogroup 10 CPS repeating unit structures for (A) Pn10A, (B) Pn10B, (C) Pn10C, and (D) Pn10F represented with the SNFG (Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans) system (Varki et al., 2015). Similarities and differences in repeating units are indicated by background color shading.
The backbones for Pn10A (Figure 2A) and Pn10C (Figure 2C) have a DGal (1→2)Rib-ol-5P linkage Pn10B (Figure 2B) and Pn10F (Figure 2D) have a DGal (1→4)Rib-ol-5P linkage. Furthermore, the substitutions on the branching DGalNAc residue differ, as follows. Pn10B, Pn10C, and Pn10F are all singly substituted with DGalf: at position three in Pn10B and at position six in both Pn10C and Pn10F. Pn10A has a double substitution on DGalNAc: a DGalf residue at position three and a DGal residue at position six.
All serogroup 10 serotypes contain the -D-galactofuranose monosaccharide— DGalf. Absent in mammals, this sugar occurs in a range of bacterial pathogens (such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae) and is often critical for virulence and/or viability of the organism (Tefsen et al., 2012) and has been identified as an immunodominant epitope (Marino et al., 2017). Human intelectin-1 (hIntL-1) is a carbohydrate binding protein in the human innate immune system that recognizes the exocyclic terminal 1,2-diol (ETD) epitope which is present in galactofuranose, but not galactopyranose (Wesener et al., 2015;
Molecular modeling is a complementary technique that can be used to correlate the conformational features of carbohydrate antigens with data on serotype cross-protection produced by immunological studies (such as serological evaluations, animal trials, human trials, or epidemiological studies) (Zaccheus et al., 2012; Sarkar et al., 2013;
2 Materials and methods
We used our established systematic approach to the modeling of polysaccharides, as previously described (
Chain length is an important consideration when modeling CPSs, as a short chain may have insufficient molecular flexibility, while long chains are more computationally expensive to model. On the basis of our previous work, we consider a 6 RU chain to be representative of the behavior of the longer polysaccharide. Further, antibodies bind small fragments of the CPS between one and seven residues in length (
Following initial system equilibration, MD simulations were performed of 3 RU and 6 RU chains of each of the CPSs. Data analyses were performed on these production runs, as described below.
2.1 Molecular dynamics
The 3 RU and 6 RU chains were built using in-house CarbBuilder software (version 1.2.42) (
Simulations of 3 RU were run using NAMD (version 2.13) (Phillips et al., 2005) with CUDA extensions for graphics processor acceleration (Stone et al., 2007); simulations of 6 RU were run using NAMD (version 3.0) with CUDA extensions for graphics processor acceleration and a GPU resident computational mode.
Periodic boundary conditions equivalent to the cubic box size were employed for the solvated simulation with wrapping on. Long range electrostatics were implemented with the Particle Mesh Ewald summation grid spacing set to 1 (
A Leap-Frog Verlet integrator was used to integrate the equations of motion over a step size of 1 fs. A distance of 15 Å was used as the cut-off for inclusion in the pair list for calculation of non-bonded forces. The short-range non-bonded interactions were calculated every 1 fs, full electrostatics calculations were performed every 2 fs, and atoms were reassigned every 10 fs (Van Gunsteren and Berendsen, 1988).
Simulations were sampled under isothermal-isobaric (nPT) ensemble. Langevin dynamics (
2.2 Convergence
We addressed convergence using block standard averaging (
For all simulations, the blocked standard error (BSE) reached plateaus for both metrics, indicating convergence. The simulation lengths were large multiples of the correlation times for end-to-end distance (Pn10A, 74 ns; Pn10B, 110 ns; Pn10C, 69 ns; Pn10F, 99 ns) and radius of gyration (Pn10A, 70 ns; Pn10B, 108 ns; Pn10C, 69 ns; Pn10F, 120 ns). Further, the numbers of independent samples were >>1 for both the end-to-end distance (Pn10A, 40; Pn10B, 27; Pn10C, 45; Pn10F, 30) and the radius of gyration (Pn10A, 43; Pn10B, 28; Pn10C, 44; Pn10F, 25). Our designated equilibration time of 200 ns is therefore greater than the correlation time.
2.3 Data analysis
Molecular conformations were visualized using VMD, with the PaperChain and Twister visualization algorithms used to highlight carbohydrate rings and chains (
Trajectories were extracted at 25 ps intervals with analysis of performed on frames 250 ps apart. Metrics such as end-to-end distances were extracted from the simulation trajectories using Tcl scripting via VMD’s Tk console. Data analyses performed with in-house Python scripts and plots generated using Matplotlib (
2.3.1 Chain flexibility
The end-to-end distance, r, was measured from C1 of DGal at the non-reducing end, to C1 of DGal at the reducing end thus excluding the highly flexible terminal residues.
2.3.2 Conformational analysis
The most common chain conformations for each simulation were determined by clustering the production trajectory frames into families and calculating the relative occupancies of each family. Clusters comprising less than 6% of the production run (post equilibration) were discarded. Clustering was performed using the WMC PhysBio plug-in for VMD’s built-in measure cluster command (
Clustering analysis was also performed on a single repeating unit, RU 4, and on the DGalNAc— DGalf linkage of RU 4. For the RU 4 analysis, molecules were aligned on the DGalNAc residue of RU 4, excluding hydrogens. Clustering was then performed on the ring and linkage atoms of RU 4, creating five clusters with a cutoff of 1.5 Å, before discarding clusters comprising less than 10% of the trajectory.
Similarly, for the DGalNAc— DGalf linkage, molecules were aligned on the DGalNAc residue of RU 4 and clustering was then performed on the DGalNAc and DGalf ring and linkage atoms. Four clusters were created with a cut-off of 1.5 Å and clusters comprising less than 6% of the production run (post-equilibration) were discarded.
2.4 hIntL-1 binding
The protein data bank (PDB) file describing the structure of human intelectin-1 (hIntL-1) bound to allyl- -galactofuranose (allyl Galf) (PDB ID: 4WMY) was obtained from the official RSCB PDB (Wesener et al., 2015). Overlay of our CPS molecules with the hIntL-1 protein binding site were created by aligning the O4, C5, O5, C6, and O6 atoms of the central side group DGalf residue from each CPS molecules with that of the allyl DGalf in the hIntL-1 binding site. We then identified frames where the molecular conformation aligns with the hIntL-1 binding site free from protein-CPS intersection with good alignment of the galactofuranose rings and exocyclic terminal-1,2-diol (ETD) moieties. For the 3 RU molecules, we aligned DGalf from RU 2 and for the 6RU molecules, DGalf from RU 3.
3 Results
We begin with a comparison of the flexibility of the serogroup 10 CPSs. This is followed by analysis of the CPS molecular conformation, exposed potential binding epitopes and, finally, an exploration of the potential for CPS binding to the hIntL-1 human innate immune protein.
3.1 Chain flexibility and conformation
The fluctuation in molecular end-to-end distance, r, over the length of the simulation is commonly used as a measure of chain extension and flexibility in carbohydrates. Here we define r to exclude the mobile terminal residues (Figure 3A). Times series plots of r for each CPS (Figures 3B–E, left column) reveal that all four molecules are highly flexible, fluctuating between a wide range of r values. Trajectory snapshots at 50 ns intervals (shown above the graphs) illustrate the considerable diversity in the molecular conformations over all the simulations. This flexibility is an expected consequence of a linear alditol (Rib-ol-5P) with a phosphodiester linkage in the CPS backbone: modeling of Haemophilus influenzae serotypes a and b CPS, which also contain this moiety, showed similarly flexible molecules (Richardson et al., 2021a).
FIGURE 3

(A) The end-to-end distance, r, is indicated on the 6 RU Pn10A molecule. Time series graphs (left column) of r and corresponding histograms (right column) for the 3,000 ns simulation trajectories are shown for: (B) Pn10A, (C) Pn10B, (D) Pn10C, and (E) Pn10F. Conformational snapshots at 50 ns intervals are shown above the time series plots. The histograms are labeled with the standard deviations () and modal peak r value(s).
Comparison of the r distributions (Figures 3B–E, right column) reveals some broad differences between the serotypes: Pn10A and Pn10F have bimodal distributions, whereas Pn10B and Pn10C are closer to unimodal, narrower and somewhat shifted to smaller values of r. Interestingly, it is the most structurally dissimilar pairs of molecules—Pn10A and Pn10F (Figures 2B,E); Pn10B and Pn10C (Figures 2C,D)—that are most similar with respect to the r distributions. While all four molecules are flexible, these data suggest an order of flexibility of Pn10A ∼ Pn10F > Pn10B > Pn10C and, relatively speaking, a slightly increased incidence of extended conformations for Pn10A and Pn10F.
The extreme flexibility of the CPS backbone means that there are no dominant chain conformations for any of the four carbohydrates (Figure 4). For RU 2 to RU 5 of the CPS backbone (i.e., 20 backbone residues) we found very few significant conformational families that occupy more than 6% of the simulation. Further, those we identified accounted for relatively small portions of the simulation (less than 25%). This indicates that these flexible chains behave as random coils, in common with other flexible carbohydrates that we have modeled (Richardson et al., 2021a; Richardson et al., 2021b).
FIGURE 4

Main conformational families identified for the 6 RU S. pneumoniae serotype CPS, with the terminal repeat units (RU 1 and RU 6) excluded from analysis: (A) Pn10A, (B) Pn10B, (C) Pn10C, and (D) Pn10F. Backbone galactose residues are shown in yellow, ribitol residues shown in grey, phosphate in purple, side group galactofuranose residues in orange, and side group galactopyranose residues in light green. The primary clusters occurred regularly throughout the trajectory. The secondary cluster of Pn10B occurred regularly in the second half of the simulation along with the primary cluster; for Pn10C the secondary cluster occurred only for ∼400 ns around the 1,500 ns timestep.
We therefore conclude that none of these flexible CPS show evidence for a conformational epitope. However, most of the CPS chain flexibility originates from the backbone phosphodiester linkage to the Rib-ol-5P in the CPS backbone, with the other glycosidic linkages being relatively constrained (Supplementary Figure S2), potentially forming stable epitopes. Further, in all four molecules, the side chain DGalf and DGal residues are solvent exposed (Figure 4) and are therefore accessible for antibody binding. As antibodies bind to carbohydrate epitopes that typically comprise one to seven residues (
3.2 Epitopes
The principal conformations for the single central repeating unit (RU 4) in each of the CPS chains are shown in Figure 5. With the highly mobile phosphodiester linkage excluded, we find dominant conformations with high occupancies ranging from 30% to 80% for the primary cluster and 13%–24% for the secondary cluster; more than 50% of the simulation trajectory falls within these dominant clusters. For Pn10A (Figure 5A) the 6-linked DGal side chain (yellow) protrudes from the backbone and is located close to the phosphate group, providing a conformational rational for the dominance of DGal as an antibody binding epitope for Pn10A (Nahm et al., 2020). In contrast, the immunodominant DGalf side chain in Pn10A is 3-linked and aligned with the backbone and thus less exposed for binding. This is also the case for the 3-linked DGalf side chain in Pn10B (Figure 5B), which is in a similar orientation to Pn10A. However, Pn10C and Pn10F (Figures 5C,D) have a 6-linked DGalf side chain, which is considerably more exposed and thus a more promising epitope. This 6-linked side chain is also more flexible than the 3-linked DGalf in Pn10A and Pn10B; it is oriented in different directions across the dominant conformational clusters in Pn10C and Pn10F. As the DGalf residue is conserved across the serogroup, this immunodominant epitope could form the basis of the observed serotype cross-reactivity. In particular, for DGalf, the exocyclic 1,2-terminal diol (ETD, colored green in Figure 5) is a potential epitope for CPS binding of the hIntL-1 human innate immune protein. A second ETD from the 4,5-linked ribitol of Rib-ol-5P is present in Pn10B and Pn10F, shown in cyan in Figures 5B,D.
FIGURE 5

Main conformational families identified for RU 4 in the backbone of 6 RU S. pneumoniae serotype CPS: (A) Pn10A, (B) Pn10B, (C) Pn10C, and (D) Pn10F. Backbone galactose residues shown in yellow, Rib-ol-5P residues shown in grey, phosphate in purple, side group Galf residues in orange, side group Gal residues in light green, ETD portion of Galf in green, and ETD portion of Rib-ol-5P residues in cyan.
To explore the range of conformations of the immunodominant DGalf epitope in finer detail, we focus on the conformations of the DGalNAc— DGalf disaccharide in the CPS chain in Figure 6. The primary (blue) and secondary (red) conformational families are super-imposed in Figure 6A for all four serotypes. It is clear that 3-linked DGalf (Pn10A and Pn10B) side chains have a single dominant conformation (>90% occupancy), whereas Pn10C and Pn10F, with 6-linked DGalf, do not. Pn10C has two main conformations (56% and 20% occupancy, respectively) while Pn10F has three (37%, 20%, and 17% occupancy, respectively). Comparison of representative structures for each conformational family suggests four distinct conformational epitopes (EP) of the DGalNAc— DGalf disaccharide across the serotypes (Figure 6B). Pn10A and Pn10B share the same dominant conformational epitope of 3-linked DGalf, which we term EP1. Pn10C and Pn10F also share a main conformation for their 6-linked DGalf, which we term EP2, as well as a secondary conformation (EP3). Pn10F also has a unique conformation of this disaccharide, which we term EP4. Further—considering the DGalf and ETD orientations relative to the backbone—EP1 and EP3 are similar while EP2 is related to EP3 by a 180° rotation; EP4 is a distinct epitope.
FIGURE 6

Conformational epitopes of the DGalNAc— DGalf disaccharide in S. pneumoniae serogroup 10, RU 4. (A) Super-imposed conformational families (>5%) of the DGalNAc— DGalf disaccharide with associated percentages for the four CPS molecules. (B) Representative conformational epitopes (EP1-4) of the DGalNAc— DGalf disaccharide for the four CPS molecules, with associated percentage occupancies, grouped according to conformational similarity.
These conformational epitopes identified for DGalf help to rationalize the trends in cross-reactivity observed for serogroup 10 (Figure 1), as follows. Firstly, the strong reciprocal cross-reactivity of Pn10A with Pn10B can be attributed to the shared EP1 epitope (Figure 6B, first panel). Similarly, the shared epitopes EP2 and EP3 explain the strong reciprocal cross-reactivity between Pn10C and Pn10F (Figure 6B, second and third panels). Then, the cross-reactivity of Pn10A/Pn10B with Pn10C/Pn10F can be explained by the conformational similarities between EP1 and EP2/EP3 (Figure 6B, first three panels). Further, for Pn10A/Pn10B the cross reactivity is stronger with Pn10C than with Pn10F, because the combined prevalence of the EP2 and EP3 epitopes is considerably more in Pn10C (76%) than in Pn10F (57%). Likewise, the weaker reciprocal cross-reactivity of Pn10C with these serotypes can be explained by the lower prevalence of the EP2 and EP3 conformational epitopes in Pn10C—fewer antibodies generated against these epitopes would hence, be less likely to recognize EP1 dominant in Pn10A/Pn10B. Similarly, the still weaker reciprocal cross-reactivity of Pn10F can be explained by the even lower expression of EP2 and EP3 as well as an additional conformational epitope, EP4, not shared by any of the other serotypes.
3.3 hIntL-1 binding
The exocyclic 1,2-terminal diol on DGalf (ETD) is a potential epitope for CPS binding to the hIntL-1 human innate immune protein. We used the crystal structure of hIntL-1 bound to allyl DGalf (Figure 7A)(
FIGURE 7

Human intelectin-1 (hIntL-1) binding. (A) Monomer of the crystal structure of hIntL-1 bound with allyl-beta-galactofuranose (PDB ID: 4WMY). Example conformations of the 3 RU CPSs with the DGalf side chain positioned in the hIntL-1 binding site are shown for (B) Pn10A, (C) Pn10B, (D) Pn10C, and (E) Pn10F. The end-to-end distance (r) of these conformations are 33 Å, 41 Å, 16 Å, and 33 Å for Pn10A, Pn10B, Pn10C, and Pn10F, respectively. Overlay of our CPS molecules with the hIntL-1 protein binding site were created by aligning the O4, C5, O5, C6, and O6 atoms of the central side group (RU 2) DGalf residue from each CPS molecule with that of the allyl DGalf in the hIntL-1 binding site. We then identified frames where the molecular conformation aligns with the hIntL-1 binding site free from protein-CPS intersection with good alignment of the galactofuranose rings and exocyclic terminal-1,2-diol (ETD) moieties.
4 Discussion
Our simulations show that S. pneumoniae serogroup 10 have highly flexible CPSs, which is unsurprisingly due to the backbone linear Rib-ol-5P alditol. Highly flexible bacterial CPSs are common and we have previously suggested that this is a strategy for bacterial evasion of the host immune system: a flexible backbone with multiple conformations presents a “moving target” to the immune system (
The more flexible 6-linked DGalf, present in both Pn10C and Pn10F, gives rise to the conformational epitopes EP2 and EP3, which are similar to the EP1 epitope and suggests some cross-protection for a Pn10A vaccine against both Pn10C and Pn10F. The relative proportions of EP2 and EP3 expressed in the serotypes accounts for the asymmetry of cross-reactivity (Figure 1), as the stronger cross-reactivity of Pn10A/Pn10B with Pn10C than with Pn10F corresponds to a higher prevalence of the EP2/EP3 epitopes in Pn10C (76% versus 57%). This is in line with our modeling of the CPS from meningococcal serogroups Y and W (Kuttel et al., 2017): we found that the less flexible serogroup Y CPS has a single dominant conformation, which corresponds to only one of several conformational epitopes exhibited by the closely related, but more flexible, serogroup W CPS. This explained the asymmetric cross-protection observed in the clinic: vaccination with serogroup Y elicited cross-protection against serogroup W in the majority of subjects, whereas minimal cross-protection was observed against serogroup Y following serogroup W vaccination. Further, the DGalf EP1 epitope could correspond to the factor serum 10d epitope reported in the literature, as 10d reacts strongly with Pn10A and Pn10B (displaying EP1), but only weakly with Pn10C and Pn10F (displaying EP2/EP3) (Yu et al., 2005;
Pn10C and Pn10F also share both the DGalf EP2 and EP3 conformational epitopes, which explains their strong mutual cross-reactivity, although Pn10F has an additional conformational epitope EP4 (17%) not present in the other serotypes.
The recently discovered serotype Pn10D has a different backbone (and was not modeled in this study), but also exposes the 6-linked DGalp and 3-linked DGalf side chains found in Pn10A (
Finally, we showed that the hIntL-1 human innate immune protein has the potential to bind the EP1/EP2 epitope in serogroup 10, containing the exocyclic 1,2-terminal diol on DGalf. Binding of 3-linked DGalf EP1 epitope in Pn10A and Pn10B results in closer proximity of the CPS backbone to the protein than for the more accessible 6-linked DGalf EP2 epitope in Pn10C and Pn10F, suggesting that serotypes Pn10A/Pn10B will be bound less readily. This may play a role in the strength of the innate immune response and hence serotype disease prevalence with more cases reported for Pn10A/Pn10B than Pn10C/Pn10F.
In conclusion, the common epitopes we have identified for serogroup 10 support a vaccine containing serotype 10A providing adequate cross-protection against serogroup 10 disease, as indicated by serological studies.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.rcsb.org/structure/4WMY.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, MMK and NR; methodology, MMK; software, MMK and NIR; validation, MMK and NIR; investigation, NIR; resources, MMK and NR; data curation, MMK; writing-original draft preparation, NIR; writing-review and editing, MMK and NR; supervision, MMK and NR; visualization, MMK and NIR; funding acquisition, MMK and NR.
Funding
This research was partially funded by the University of Cape Town (research scholarship for NIR).
Acknowledgments
Computations were performed using facilities provided by the University of Cape Town’s ICTS High Performance Computing team: http://hpc.uct.ac.za.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2022.961532/full#supplementary-material
Glossary
- DGal
-D-galactopyranose
- DGlcp
-D-glucopyranose
- allyl Galf
allyl--galactofuranose
- Pn
serotype-specific rabbit antisera
- DGal
-D-galactopyranose
- DGalf
-D-galactofuranose
- GalNAc
N-acetyl--D-galactosamine
- BSE
block standard averaging
- CPS
capsular polysaccharide
- CUDA
compute unified device architecture
- EP
epitope
- ETD
exocyclic terminal-1,2-diol
- GPU
graphics processing unit
- hIntL-1
human intelectin-1
- IPD
invasive pneumococcal disease
- KDO
3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulopyranosonic acid
- KO
D-glycero-D-talo-oct-2-ulosonic acid
- MD
molecular dynamics
- NAMD
nanoscale molecular dynamics
- nPT
isothermal-isobaric
- PCV
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
- PDB
Protein Data Bank
- Pn10A
S. pneumoniae serotype 10A
- Pn10B
S. pneumoniae serotype 10B
- Pn10C
S. pneumoniae serotype 10C
- Pn10D
S. pneumoniae serotype 10D
- Pn10F
S. pneumoniae serotype 10F
- PPV
pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine
- PSF
protein structure file
- r
end-to-end distance
- Rib-ol-5P
D-ribitol-5-phosphate
- RMSD
root-mean-square deviation
- RSCB
Royal Society of Chemistry Biology
- RU
repeating unit
- VMD
visual molecular dynamics
References
1
AytenfisuA. H.SimonR.MacKerellA. D.Jr (2019). Impact of branching on the conformational heterogeneity of the lipopolysaccharide from Klebsiella pneumoniae: Implications for vaccine design. Carbohydr. Res.475, 39–47. 10.1016/j.carres.2019.02.003
2
BalsellsE.GuillotL.NairH.KyawM. H. (2017). Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children in the post-PCV era: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One12 (5), e0177113. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177113
3
BushC. A.YangJ.YuB.CisarJ. O. (2014). Chemical structures of Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide type 39 (CPS39), CPS47F, and CPS34 characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and their relation to CPS10A. J. Bacteriol.196 (18), 3271–3278. 10.1128/JB.01731-14
4
ChenL.LiJ.YangG. (2020). A comparative review of intelectins. Scand. J. Immunol.92 (1), e12882. 10.1111/sji.12882
5
CrossS.KuttelM. M.StoneJ. E.GainJ. E. (2009). Visualisation of cyclic and multi-branched molecules with VMD. J. Mol. Graph. Model.28 (2), 131–139. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2009.04.010
6
DardenT.YorkD.PedersenL. (1993). Particle mesh Ewald: AnN log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys.98 (12), 10089–10092. 10.1063/1.464397
7
dos SantosS. R.PassadoreL. F.TakagiE. H.FujiiC. M.YoshiokaC. R.GilioA. E. (2013). Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from patients with invasive pneumococcal disease in Brazil before and after ten-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine implementation. Vaccine31 (51), 6150–6154. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.042
8
FellerS. E.ZhangY.PastorR. W.BrooksB. R. (1995). Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys.103 (11), 4613–4621. 10.1063/1.470648
9
GanaieF.SaadJ. S.McGeeL.van TonderA. J.BentleyS. D.LoS. W.et al (2020). A new pneumococcal capsule type, 10D, is the 100th serotype and has a large cps fragment from an oral streptococcus. mBio11 (3), 937. 10.1128/mBio.00937-20
10
GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators (2018). Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet.Infectious Dis.18 (11), 1191. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30310-4
11
GenoK. A.GilbertG. L.SongJ. Y.SkovstedI. C.KlugmanK. P.JonesC.et al (2015). Pneumococcal capsules and their types: Past, present, and future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.28 (3), 871–899. 10.1128/CMR.00024-15
12
Gracia Luis (2012). WMC PhysBio clustering. Available at: https://github.com/luisico/clustering (Accessed June, 2020).
13
GrossfieldA.ZuckermanD. M. (2009). Quantifying uncertainty and sampling quality in biomolecular simulations. Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem.5, 23–48. 10.1016/S1574-1400(09)00502-7
14
GuvenchO.GreeneS. N.KamathG.BradyJ. W.VenableR. M.PastorR. W.et al (2008). Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides. J. Comput. Chem.29 (15), 2543–2564. 10.1002/jcc.21004
15
GuvenchO.HatcherE.VenableR. M.PastorR. W.MacKerellA. D.Jr (2009). CHARMM additive all-atom force field for glycosidic linkages between hexopyranoses. J. Chem. Theory Comput.5 (9), 2353–2370. 10.1021/ct900242e
16
HenrichsenJ. (1995). Six newly recognized types of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol.33 (10), 2759–2762. 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2759-2762.1995
17
HlozekJ.OwenS.RavenscroftN.KuttelM. M. (2020). Molecular modeling of the Shigella flexneri serogroup 3 and 5 O-antigens and conformational relationships for a vaccine containing serotypes 2a and 3a. Vaccines8 (4), 643. 10.3390/vaccines8040643
18
HooverW. G. (1985). Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A31 (3), 1695. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
19
HumphreyW.DalkeA.SchultenK. (1996). Vmd: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph.14 (1), 33–38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
20
HunterJ. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng.9 (3), 90–95. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
21
IsabellaC. R. (2021). Carbohydrate and bacterial binding specificity of human intelectin-1. Available at: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582.
22
JanssensE.FlamaingJ.VandermeulenC.PeetermansW. E.DesmetS.De MunterP. (2022). The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20): Expected added value. Acta Clin. Belg. Prepr., 1–9. 10.1080/17843286.2022.2039865
23
JauneikaiteE.JefferiesJ. M.HibberdM. L.ClarkeS. C. (2012). Prevalence of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes causing invasive and non-invasive disease in south east asia: A review. Vaccine30 (24), 3503–3514. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.066
24
JonesC. (1995). Full assignment of the NMR spectrum of the capsular polysaccharide from Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 10A. Carbohydr. Res.269 (1), 175–181. 10.1016/0008-6215(94)00340-L
25
JorgensenW. L.ChandrasekharJ.MaduraJ. D.ImpeyR. W.KleinM. L. (1983). Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys.79 (2), 926–935. 10.1063/1.445869
26
KabatE. A. (1966). The nature of an antigenic determinant. J. Immunol.97 (1), 1–11.
27
KangY.BarbirzS.LipowskyR.SanterM. (2014). Conformational diversity of O-antigen polysaccharides of the Gram-negative bacterium Shigella flexneri serotype Y. J. Phys. Chem. B118 (9), 2523–2534. 10.1021/jp4111713
28
KiesslingL. L. (2018). Chemistry-driven glycoscience. Bioorg. Med. Chem.26 (19), 5229–5238. 10.1016/j.bmc.2018.09.024
29
KlugmanK. P.RodgersG. L. (2021). Time for a third-generation pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Lancet Infect. Dis.21 (1), 14–16. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30513-2
30
KobayashiM. (2022). Use of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among US adults: Updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices—United States, 2022. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.71, 109. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104a1
31
KonradsenH. B. (2005). Validation of serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Europe. Vaccine23 (11), 1368–1373. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.09.011
32
KuttelM.MaoY.WidmalmG.LundborgM. (2011). “CarbBuilder: An adjustable tool for building 3D molecular structures of carbohydrates for molecular simulation,” in Presented at the 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience, Stockholm, Sweden, December 2011 (IEEE), 395–402. 10.1109/eScience.2011.61
33
KuttelM. M. (2022). Comparative molecular modelling of capsular polysaccharide conformations in Streptococcus suis serotypes 1, 2, 1/2 and 14 identifies common epitopes for antibody binding. Front. Mol. Biosci.9, 830854. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.830854
34
KuttelM. M.RavenscroftN. (2018). “The role of molecular modeling in predicting carbohydrate antigen conformation and understanding vaccine immunogenicity,” in Carbohydrate-based vaccines: From concept to clinic. Editor Prasad KrishnaA. (Washington, D.C: ACS Publications), 139–173. 10.1021/bk-2018-1290.ch007
35
KuttelM. M.RavenscroftN. (2019). Conformation and cross-protection in group B Streptococcus serotype III and Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 14: A molecular modeling study. Pharmaceuticals12 (1), 28. 10.3390/ph12010028
36
KuttelM. M.StåhleJ.WidmalmG. (2016). CarbBuilder: Software for building molecular models of complex oligo‐and polysaccharide structures. J. Comput. Chem.37 (22), 2098–2105. 10.1002/jcc.24428
37
KuttelM. M.TimolZ.RavenscroftN. (2017). Cross-protection in Neisseria meningitidis serogroups Y and W polysaccharides: A comparative conformational analysis. Carbohydr. Res.446-447 (29), 40–47. 10.1016/j.carres.2017.05.004
38
LindbergA. A. (1999). Glycoprotein conjugate vaccines. Vaccine17 (S2), S28–S36. 10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00232-7
39
MarinoC.RinflerchA.de LederkremerR. M. (2017). Galactofuranose antigens, a target for diagnosis of fungal infections in humans. Future Sci. OA3 (3), FSO199. 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0030
40
McGuinnessD.KaufholdR. M.McHughP. M.WintersM. A.SmithW. J.GiovarelliC.et al (2021). Immunogenicity of PCV24, an expanded pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in adult monkeys and protection in mice. Vaccine39 (30), 4231–4237. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.067
41
MessaoudiM.MilenkovM.AlbrichW. C.van der LindenMarkP. G.BénetT.et al (2016). The relevance of a novel quantitative assay to detect up to 40 major Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes directly in clinical nasopharyngeal and blood specimens. PLoS One11 (3), e0151428. 10.1371/journal.pone.0151428
42
MoreauM.SchulzD. (2000). Polysaccharide based vaccines for the prevention of pneumococcal infections. J. Carbohydr. Chem.19 (4-5), 419–434. 10.1080/07328300008544091
43
NahmM. H.YuJ.VlachJ.Bar-PeledM. (2020). A common food glycan, pectin, shares an antigen with Streptococcus pneumoniae capsule. Msphere5 (2), 74. 10.1128/mSphere.00074-20
44
NoséS.KleinM. L. (1983). Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Mol. Phys.50 (5), 1055–1076. 10.1080/00268978300102851
45
PetersenB. O.MeierS.PaulsenB. S.RedondoA. R.SkovstedI. C. (2014). Determination of native capsular polysaccharide structures of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 39, 42, and 47F and comparison to genetically or serologically related strains. Carbohydr. Res.395, 38–46. 10.1016/j.carres.2014.06.018
46
PhillipsJ. C.BraunR.WangW.GumbartJ.TajkhorshidE.VillaE.et al (2005). Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem.26 (16), 1781–1802. 10.1002/jcc.20289
47
RichardsonN. I.KuttelM. M.MichaelF. S.CairnsC.CoxA. D.RavenscroftN. (2021a). Cross-reactivity of Haemophilus influenzae type a and b polysaccharides: Molecular modeling and conjugate immunogenicity studies. Glycoconj. J.38, 735–746. 10.1007/s10719-021-10020-0
48
RichardsonN. I.RavenscroftN.AratoV.OldriniD.MicoliF.KuttelM. M. (2021b). Conformational and immunogenicity studies of the Shigella flexneri serogroup 6 O-antigen: The effect of O-acetylation. Vaccines9 (5), 432. 10.3390/vaccines9050432
49
SarkarA.FontanaC.ImbertyA.PerezS.WidmalmG. (2013). Conformational preferences of the O-antigen polysaccharides of Escherichia coli O5ac and O5ab using NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling. Biomacromolecules14 (7), 2215–2224. 10.1021/bm400354y
50
SpencerB. L.SaadJ. S.ShenoyA. T.OrihuelaC. J.NahmM. H. (2017). Position of O-acetylation within the capsular repeat unit impacts the biological properties of pneumococcal serotypes 33A and 33F. Infect. Immun.85 (7), 132. 10.1128/IAI.00132-17
51
StoneJ. E.PhillipsJ. C.FreddolinoP. L.HardyD. J.TrabucoL. G.SchultenK. (2007). Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J. Comput. Chem.28 (16), 2618–2640. 10.1002/jcc.20829
52
TefsenB.RamA. F.van DieI.RoutierF. H. (2012). Galactofuranose in eukaryotes: Aspects of biosynthesis and functional impact. Glycobiology22 (4), 456–469. 10.1093/glycob/cwr144
53
Van GunsterenW. F.BerendsenH. J. (1988). A leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol. Simul.1 (3), 173–185. 10.1080/08927028808080941
54
VarkiA.CummingsR. D.AebiM.PackerN. H.SeebergerP. H.EskoJ. D.et al (2015). Symbol nomenclature for graphical representations of glycans. Glycobiology25 (12), 1323–1324. 10.1093/glycob/cwv091
55
WahlB.O'BrienK. L.GreenbaumA.MajumderA.LiuL.ChuY.et al (2018). Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccines: Global, regional, and national estimates for 2000–15. Lancet Glob. Health6 (7), e744–e757. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30247-X
56
WassermanM. D.PerdrizetJ.GrantL.HayfordK.SinghS.SahariaP.et al (2021). Clinical and economic burden of pneumococcal disease due to serotypes contained in current and investigational pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in children under five years of age. Infect. Dis. Ther.10 (4), 2701–2720. 10.1007/s40121-021-00544-1
57
WesenerD. A.WangkanontK.McBrideR.SongX.KraftM. B.HodgesH. L.et al (2015). Recognition of microbial glycans by human intelectin-1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.22 (8), 603–610. 10.1038/nsmb.3053
58
WoutersI.DesmetS.Van HeirstraetenL.BlaizotS.VerhaegenJ.Van DammeP.et al (2019). Follow-up of serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in child carriage after a PCV13-to-PCV10 vaccine switch in Belgium. Vaccine37 (8), 1080–1086. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.068
59
YangJ.NahmM. H.BushC. A.CisarJ. O. (2011). Comparative structural and molecular characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide serogroup 10. J. Biol. Chem.286 (41), 35813–35822. 10.1074/jbc.M111.255422
60
YangJ.ShelatN. Y.BushC. A.CisarJ. O. (2010). Structure and molecular characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide 10F by carbohydrate engineering in Streptococcus oralis. J. Biol. Chem.285 (31), 24217–24227. 10.1074/jbc.M110.123562
61
YangM.SimonR.MacKerellA. D.Jr (2017). Conformational preference of serogroup B Salmonella O polysaccharide in presence and absence of the monoclonal antibody Se155–4. J. Phys. Chem. B121 (15), 3412–3423. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b08955
62
YuJ.LinJ.BenjaminW. H.JrWaitesK. B.LeeC.NahmM. H. (2005). Rapid multiplex assay for serotyping pneumococci with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol.43 (1), 156–162. 10.1128/JCM.43.1.156-162.2005
63
ZaccheusM.PendrillR.JacksonT. A.WangA.AuzanneauF.WidmalmG. (2012). Conformational dynamics of a central trisaccharide fragment of the LeaLex tumor associated antigen studied by NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations. Eur. J. Org. Chem.2012 (25), 4705–4715. 10.1002/ejoc.201200569
64
ZhangS.SellaM.SianturiJ.PriegueP.ShenD.SeebergerP. H. (2021). Discovery of oligosaccharide antigens for semi‐synthetic glycoconjugate vaccine leads against Streptococcus suis serotypes 2, 3, 9 and 14. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60 (26), 14679–14692. 10.1002/anie.202103990
Summary
Keywords
S. pneumoniae, serogroup 10, capsular polysaccharide, vaccine antigen, molecular modeling, cross-protection, carbohydrate epitopes
Citation
Richardson NI, Kuttel MM and Ravenscroft N (2022) Modeling of pneumococcal serogroup 10 capsular polysaccharide molecular conformations provides insight into epitopes and observed cross-reactivity. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:961532. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.961532
Received
04 June 2022
Accepted
04 July 2022
Published
08 August 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Daron I. Freedberg, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States
Reviewed by
Alexander MacKerell, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
Jeahoo Kwon, United States Food and Drug Administration, United States
Andreas Franz, The University of the Pacific, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Richardson, Kuttel and Ravenscroft.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Neil Ravenscroft, neil.ravenscroft@uct.ac.za
This article was submitted to Glycoscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.