Abstract
Sweet taste is a primary sensation for the preference and adaption of primates to diet, which is crucial for their survival and fitness. It is clear now that the sweet perception is mediated by a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-sweet taste receptor T1R2/T1R3, and many behavioral or physiological experiments have described the diverse sweet taste sensitivities in primates. However, the structure-function relationship of T1R2s/T1R3s in primates, especially the molecular basis for their species-dependent sweet taste, has not been well understood until now. In this study, we performed a comprehensive sequence, structural and functional analysis of sweet taste receptors in primates to elucidate the molecular determinants mediating their species-dependent sweet taste recognition. Our results reveal distinct taxonomic distribution and significant characteristics (interaction, coevolution and epistasis) of specific key function-related residues, which could partly account for the previously reported behavioral results of taste perception in primates. Moreover, the prosimians Lemuriformes species, which were reported to have no sensitivity to aspartame, could be proposed to be aspartame tasters based on the present analysis. Collectively, our study provides new insights and promotes a better understanding for the diversity, function and evolution of sweet taste receptors in primates.
Introduction
The sweet taste sensation is one of the five primary taste qualities (sweet, bitter, umami, sour and salty) enabling animals to distinguish beneficial foods and facilitating their adaption to environmental niches (; ). Diversification of sweet taste preferences in primate species toward various sweeteners has been extensively reported, and the sweet sensory system of primates shows remarkable flexibility that essentially increases their survival capabilities (). It is well known that the sweet taste is mediated by a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-sweet taste receptor located on the membrane of oral gustatory buds (Jordan et al., 2009). Therefore, information of the structure and function of this receptor in primates is meaningful for understanding the molecular basis of their species-dependent sweet taste as well as evolution.
The sweet taste receptor is a heterodimer composed of two subunits T1R2 and T1R3, which belongs to the family C GPCRs (; ; Zhao et al., 2003). This receptor is characterized by a large extracellular domain, which consists of an N-terminal Venus flytrap module (VFTM) and a cysteine-rich domain (CRD), a heptahelical transmembrane domain (TMD) and an intracellular domain (ID) (Figure 1A) (; Xu et al., 2004). With the methods of molecular simulations and functional mutagenesis/chimera analysis, previous studies have revealed that there are multiple binding sites in the receptor for various sweeteners (; ; ; ; Winnig et al., 2007; ; ). However, the spatial structure information of sweet taste receptor and its complexes with sweeteners is still unavailable due to some experimental obstacles.
FIGURE 1
It has been demonstrated that the basic and simple sugars or amino acids can be perceived by all of the primates found so far, as evidenced in many previous behavioral or electrophysiological tests (; ). However, the artificial sweetener aspartame can be perceived by Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans, but not by New World monkeys and rodents, as proved by both in vivo and vitro investigations (; ). With molecular simulations and functional mutagenesis analysis, previous studies have characterized the binding site of aspartame and its involved residues located in the extracellular VFTM region of human T1R2: S40, Y103, D142, Y215, P277, D278, L279, S303, D307, R383 and V384 in human T1R2. Furthermore, we have revealed that two critical residues S40 and D142 in human T1R2, which correspond to T40 and E142 in squirrel monkey T1R2 respectively, mediate the species-dependent taste toward aspartame between human (taster) and squirrel monkey (non-taster) (). Moreover, residue at site 142 is critical that determines the switch between taste and non-taste toward aspartame via interacting with aspartame via a water bridge, while residue at site 40 modulates the intensity of taste and is suggested to mediate the signal transduction and conformation change upon receptor activation ().
Another intriguing species-dependent taste is toward the intensively sweet proteins. Previous studies have shown that the sweet-tasting proteins could be perceived by Old World monkeys, apes and humans, but not by New World monkeys and rodents (; ). It is still unclear nowadays how these large weight and bulk sweet-tasting proteins bind and interact with the sweet taste receptor. With functional mutagenesis analysis, Jiang et al. reported that the discrepancy of residues A537 and F540 located in the CRD of human T1R3, which correspond to T542 and P545 of mouse T1R3 respectively, jointly determine the different sensitivity between human (taster) and mouse (non-taster) toward the sweet-tasting protein brazzein (). Furthermore, It was revealed that five residues (Q504, A537, R556, S559 and R560) located in the CRD of human T1R3 play important roles for the sensitivity to the sweet-tasting protein thaumatin (). Therefore, it seems that the CRD region in T1R3 mediate the species-dependent recognition toward sweet-tasting proteins. In Jiang et al.’s result, the mouse to human mutations T542A could gain the sensitivity to brazzein whereas P545F could not, indicating a more critical role of T542 (corresponding to A537 in human T1R3) ().
Analysis of the genomic and proteomic information available indicates that the sweet taste receptor T1R2/T1R3 is widely distributed in all kingdoms of mammalia including primates (; ). To date, the T1R2s/T1R3s of primate species humans, squirrel monkeys and asian colobine monkeys have been characterized with the cell-based signal assays, indicating their functional differentiation (; ). Furthermore, many behavioral and gustatory responses tests have shown diverse sweet taste preferences in primates, suggesting a high degree of functional flexibility (; ; ; ; ). However, integrative analysis and comparison of the sequence, structure and function of T1R2s/T1R3s in primates as well as their determinative residues is still scarce. In this study, we performed a sequence and structure based analysis of the sweet taste receptors in primates to account for the experimental findings of their sweet taste, especially the key amino acids mediating their species-specific sweet taste recognition. Our findings provide new insight and deeper understanding into the molecular determinants of the diversity, function and evolution of sweet taste in primates.
Materials and methods
Collection of the data resources
The protein sequences of the sweet taste receptors T1R2 and T1R3 in primates were initially retrieved from the InterPro database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro) (). Redundant and fragment sequences were removed manually. Additional sequences were obtained according to the published literature (; ). For the T1R2 or T1R3 sequences that are absent in the InterPro database, we searched the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Furthermore, the redundant N-terminal sequences of T1R3s in sooty mangabey and crab-eating macaque were removed manually due to their identities of immature precursor/isoform. Moreover, the T1R3 sequence of black crested mangabey (Genbank accession No: KJ794728) was excluded for analysis because it is annotated as a pseudogene. To ensure the accurate prediction of the T1R2 and T1R3 gene families, the obtained putative protein sequences were screened for the presence of nine conserved cysteine residues in their CRD region using the clustalW sequence alignment tool (Thompson et al., 1994), and for the presence of seven transmembrane domains using TMHMM Server v.2.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?TMHMM-2.0) (), which are characteristics of the taste receptors in class C GPCRs. The proteins identified in the databases are listed in Supplementary Data Sheet S1.
Phylogenetic analysis and sequence similarity networks
The phylogenetic trees of T1R2 and T1R3 were generated using the MEGA 4.0 program. The trees are constructed using the method of neighbor-joining (NJ) and bootstrapping with 1,000 replications (Saitou and Nei, 1987). Construction of the sequence similarity networks (SSNs) based on the analyzed protein sequences was carried out with the Enzyme Function Initiative-Enzyme Similarity Tool (EFI-EST, https://efi.igb.illinois.edu/efi-est/), and the results were visualized with the Cytoscape 3.9 software (Shannon et al., 2003; ).
Multiple sequence alignments and analysis of coevolving protein residues
Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of the T1R2s and T1R3s were performed with the ClustalW (version 1.83) program (Thompson et al., 1994). The coevolutionary relationship between two residues in the T1R2 and T1R3 families were analyzed based on the mutual information (MI), which was obtained according to the results of MSAs using the MISTIC web server (http://mistic.leloir.org.ar/index.php) (Simonetti et al., 2013). MI indicates the extent to which knowledge of the amino acid at one position can allow prediction of the amino acid at the other position.
Molecular simulation of the sweet taste receptors
The homology model of full-length human T1R2/T1R3 was constructed using the Swiss-Model program (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) with the heterodimeric human metabotropic GABA(B) receptor (PDB: 6UO8) as the template. A sequence alignment of the human T1R2 and T1R3 and template sequences was carried out with ClustalW, and the human T1R2 and T1R3 were uploaded as hetero targets for modeling, respectively. The resulted model was evaluated with the Verify 3D program with acceptable scores and was selected for following simulation ().
To construct the complex of aspartame and the modeled human T1R2/T1R3, molecular docking was performed using the Vina protocol in Yinfo Cloud Computing Platform (https://cloud.yinfotek.com/), with the previously well-characterized aspartame-receptor interactive residues (Y103, D142, Y215, P277, D278, L279, S303, D307, R383 and V384) as the constraints (). The final docked complex was selected by binding energies and cluster analysis.
Results
Taxonomic distribution and classification of T1R2s and T1R3s in primates
Our initial search in the InterPro database revealed that mammals harboring sweet taste receptors could be devided into four categories: primates, ungulates, pterodactyls and carnivores. Moreover, the species in primate kingdom can be subclassified into three taxonomic groups which include simians Platyrrhini (New World monkeys), Catarrhini (Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans), and prosimians Lemuriformes (Figures 2, 3). All the T1R2 and T1R3 sequences in primates show the typical seven trans-membrane helix domain and nine conserved cysteine residues motif as revealed by the TMHMM and clustalW analysis, respectively, suggesting their intact functionality, although pseudogenization and sweet taste loss have been found in some other species, such as carnivora ().
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
To gain a detailed view of the evolutionary relationships, phylogenetic analysis was performed. The results show that the three taxonomic groups of T1R2s in primates mentioned above are well separated and clustered in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). All subgroups appear to be in separate clade in the phylogenetic tree, suggesting distinct evolutionary pressure and course for sweet taste recognition among these primate species. The varieties of ecological environment and adaption histories for these species could confer their multifarious sequence distributions of sweet taste receptors in evolution (Yarmolinsky et al., 2009; ).
Phylogenetic analysis of T1R3s in primates was performed as that of T1R2s (Figure 3). The results show that similar clusters of taxonomic distribution in the phylogenetic tree for T1R3s as that for T1R2s, implying a coevolutionary history between T1R2 and T1R3, which is in accordance with the essential roles of each subunit for the integrated functionality of the heterodimeric sweet taste receptor T1R2/T1R3 (; Xu et al., 2004).
To further clarify the relationships among these sweet taste receptors, a SSN for the analyzed T1R2 or T1R3 sequences was constructed respectively by EFI-EST with an e-value threshold of 10–5 (Figure 4A) (). Each protein was painted according to taxonomic classification. In each network, sequences above 96% (T1R2) or 98% (T1R3) identity were selected to draw an edge between nodes, and the proteins were classified into four clusters (with at least two edges) and four discrete groups. It is shown that all these clusters/groups belong to the same taxonomic classification. Furthermore, similar taxonomic distributions were found in primate T1R3s as that in T1R2s (Figure 4B). Moreover, the relationships of taxonomic distributions among T1R2s and T1R3s in primates identified in the SSNs are consistent with the results in phylogenetic tree analysis (Figures 2, 3), suggesting that the evolution of sweet taste receptors in primates have been very well-conserved.
FIGURE 4
Analysis of the molecular determinants of T1R2s/T1R3s in primates for their function, diversity and evolution
Molecular determinants in T1R2
It should be meaningful to elaborate the key receptor residues determining the species-dependent taste toward aspartame in primates based on previous findings and our present analysis. The MSA clearly show that most of the previously identified aspartame binding residues (Y103, Y215, P277, D278, L279, S303, D307, R383 and V384 in human T1R2) are conserved except the two critical residues at sites 40 and 142 described above (Figure 5; Supplementary Figure S1). Specifically, it was found that all species of Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans harbor D142 (taster type) while New World monkeys harbor E142 (non-taster type), in agreement with the crucial role of residue at site 142 for the switch of sensitivity to aspartame () as well as the previously reported species-dependent sweet taste in behavioral and electrophysiological tests (; ). Another key residue S40 mediating the intensity of sweet taste is conserved in great apes, gibbons and humans, whereas T40 is present in most of other analyzed primate species, which are consistent with the previous findings that humans and apes (Catarrhini) have the higher sensitivity to aspartame (lower threshold values) than monkeys (Platyrrhini) in behavioral tests (; ).
FIGURE 5
Surprisingly, it is found that the three prosimians Lemuriformes species, which exhibited no sensitivity to aspartame in behavioral tests (; ), harbor the conserved crucial residue D142 as that of aspartame tasters, although another key residue at site 40 is variable (Figure 5). Notably, the species coquerel’s sifaka has the same two molecular determinative residues (D142 and S40) as aspartame tasters (Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans). These results suggest that prosimians Lemuriformes species could be aspartame tasters, which are contradictory to previous conclusions in behavioral tests (; ; Schilling et al., 2004). A plausible explanation is that the in vitro function of sweet taste receptor of some species may not fully reflect the behavioral outcome of response toward some sweeteners, such as an averse reaction that could be a positive response in cell-based assays (van Giesen et al., 2016). Alternatively, other residues could be involved in mediating the non-sensitivity to aspartame of sweet taste receptors in prosimians species (). Further investigations on the sensitivities of sweet taste receptors in prosimians species toward aspartame as well as their determinative residues should be interesting and informative.
Molecular determinants in T1R3
Jiang et al. revealed the critical roles of residues A537 and F540 in the CRD of human T1R3 for the sensitivity to brazzein (). Consistent with this finding, MSA shows that A at human T1R3 site 537 (brazzein taster type) is conserved in Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans (sweet proteins tasters), while T at this site (brazzein non-taster type) is present in New World monkeys and other primate species (sweet proteins non-tasters) (Figure 6; Supplementary Figure S2). Residues at human site 540 exhibits similar distribution as site 537 while site 536 displays variable substitutions. However, two non-conservative exceptions, T537 and S540 of western lowland gorilla (Hominidae) and A537 of ma’s night monkey (New World monkeys) were found. Whether or not the two species respond to sweet-tasting protein brazzein remains unknown. The other identified residues (Q504, R556, S559 and R560) in Masuda et al.’s study are almost conserved except few substitutions, with S559 showing a greater extent substitution (Figure 6) (). Together, the sequence conservation and substitution could generally account for the reported species-dependent taste toward sweet-tasting proteins in primates in previous behavioral studies, thus enabling one to predict the responses of some species based on both previous findings and present sequence analysis.
FIGURE 6
Cyclamate is an artificial sweetener which has been identified to bind within the TMD of human T1R3 (). The potential cyclamate binding pocket includes Q636, Q637, H641, H721, R723, F778 and L782. However, we found that all these residues are conserved in the T1R3s of analyzed primate species except that R723 is replaced by C for white-tufted-ear marmoset (Figure 6; Supplementary Figure S2). Previous behavioral and physiological studies have indicated that cyclamate could only be perceived by Old World monkeys, apes, gibbons and humans, but not by New World monkeys and other primates (). Therefore, it appears that the proposed residues aforesaid in the binding pocket are insufficient to account for the species-dependent taste toward cyclamate. In support of this, it has been widely accepted that other regions beyond the binding sites can also modulate the responses toward sweeteners via allosteric regulation, thus determining the sensitivity (). Moreover, although the potential binding sites of some other sweeteners (e.g., neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and saccharin) have been identified (Winnig et al., 2007; ), no corresponding behavioral or physiological results are available now to interpret these mechanical findings, and an accurate elucidation of the relationships between the molecular determining residues and species-dependent sweet taste should wait for resolution of the spatial structures of sweetener-receptor complexes in the future.
Analysis of coevolving residues in primate T1R2s/T1R3s
The residues involved in aspartame, cyclamate and sweet-tasting proteins recognition described above that exhibit almost conserved taxonomic distribution, cooperatively mediate the species-dependent taste toward these sweeteners, suggesting their interactive and coevolving relationships. To gain a deeper insight for the diversity and relationship among residues of sweet taste receptors in primates, sequence mutual information (MI) analysis of T1R2s and T1R3s was carried out, and the results are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. In this figure, A and C show the conserved and coevolving residues of T1R2s and T1R3s, and B and D show the residues with high cumulative MI (cMI) values form a connected distance network, respectively, indicating that these residues share a high MI score and are evolutionarily correlated. These results suggest significant conversation and coevolution of specific amino acids of sweet taste receptors in primates during their evolution.
It should be informative to relate the MI signal to the molecular determinant residues of T1R2s/T1R3s in primates. Most of the residues at the positions of human T1R2 (S40, Y103, D142, Y215, P277, D278, L279, S303, D307, R383 and V384) involved in aspartame recognition display considerable MI values with other residues, suggesting their coevolving interrelationships (Supplementary Data Sheet S2). Moreover, the two critical residues at human T1R2 sites (S40 and D142) for species-dependent taste toward aspartame exhibit high cMI scores 883.8 and 909.8, respectively (Table 1), highlighting their significant degree of shared mutual information and implying their important roles in the evolution of sweet taste receptors in primates. Similar patterns are also found for the determinative residues in sweet-tasting proteins recognition that Q504, I536, A537, F540, R556, and S559 at the positions of human T1R3 show remarkable cMI scores, and considerable MI values of these residues are also present (Table 1, Supplementary Data Sheet S3).
TABLE 1
| Subunit | Position in human sweet taste receptor | cMI scores |
|---|---|---|
| T1R2 | S40 | 883.798002 |
| D142 | 909.760677 | |
| V384 | 452.2915 | |
| Y103, Y215, P277, D278, L279, S303, D307, R383 | 0 | |
| T1R3 | Q504 | 669.414593 |
| I536 | 1075.411256 | |
| A537 | 719.624656 | |
| F540 | 1268.504506 | |
| R556 | 94.624677 | |
| S559 | 1886.547787 | |
| R560, Q636, Q637, H641, H721, R723, F 778, L782 | 0 |
cMI (cumulative mutual information) scores of crucial residues in T1R2s and T1R3s.
For the residues at the binding of cyclamate located at human T1R3 (Q636, Q637, H641, H721, R723, F778 and L782), it turns out that none of them display observable cMI scores (Table 1), which could be related to the fact that these residues are not involved in the species-dependent taste toward cyclamate. Furthermore, essential roles of the two T1R subunits for the functional integrity of the sweet taste receptor have been described (Xu et al., 2004), and previous studied have indicated that mutations of residues in the binding site of one sweetener located at one monomer could also affect the sensitivity of other sweeteners which bind at another monomer of the heterodimeric T1R2/T1R3 (; ; ; Yang et al., 2021). Studies on the dimeric GPCRs have revealed that cross-talk between two monomers determines receptor activation and signal integration (Rives et al., 2009). Therefore, it could be proposed that coevolution of residues between T1R2 and T1R3 as well as their interplay play significant roles for the overall activity of T1R2s/T1R3s. Lastly, it should be noted that our MI analysis can only draw a general and rough profile for predicting the interrelationships of residues, rather than precise correlations between specific positions. Nevertheless, this analysis provides helpful guidelines for better understanding the coevolutionary signal contained within sweet taste receptor families and for further investigating the molecular basis of species-dependent sweet taste in primates toward various sweeteners.
Epistasis in the evolution of sweet taste receptors in primates
Epistasis means that the phenotypic consequences of a mutation depend on the genetic background (genetic sequence) in which it occurs (). The probable epistasis among residues of sweet taste receptors in primates could be deduced from a few of functional mutagenesis studies of T1R2s/T1R3s. For example, analysis of the magnitude of activities of squirrel monkey to human T1R2 mutations (T40S and E142D) could infer obvious epistasis in the probable evolutionary trajectory for sensitivity to aspartame, as the order of intensities of acquired sensitivity in squirrel monkey to human T1R2 mutations were E142D/T40S (increased) > E142D (acquired) > T40S (no response) (). Similar epistatic effect was also found in the mouse to human T1R3 mutations for acquired sensitivity to sweet-tasting protein brazzein, as shown by an order of intensities of sensitivities in these mutations T542A/F541I/P545F > T542A/P545F > T542A > P545F (no response) (). To our knowledge, epistasis in the evolution of sweet taste receptors has not been reported up to now due to the relatively less information of the function of mutations for these receptors, thus further research on this topic should be informative for understanding the molecular mechanism of evolution of sweet taste in primates.
Structural analysis of the molecular determinant residues of T1R2s/T1R3s in primates
Molecular modeling and docking were performed to elucidate the structural basis of key residues determining the species-dependent taste. As shown in Figure 1B, aspartame binds into a pocket via its interactions with the receptor residues. The two critical residues S40 and D142 are located near the binding site of aspartame, and the D142 can interact with the O1 atom of aspartame via hydrogen bonds bridge of a water molecule. Replacement of D142 by E (font in blue) that has a larger side chain in the squirrel monkey T1R2 could presumably reduce the volume of the binding pocket, leading to a failure of entrance into the site for aspartame. Moreover, S40 interacts with E142 via a hydrogen bond, which could stabilize the appropriate conformation of E142 for aspartame binding, thus exhibiting a cooperative role with D142 in aspartame recognition (; ).
Figure 1A shows the binding with sweet-tasting proteins brazzein or thaumatin in the CRD region of the sweet taste receptor. It is noteworthy that the two proteins could probably interact with the receptor via long distance surface charge complementarity due to their large bulk/volume, as proposed by the wedge model (Temussi, 2011). The binding pocket of another sweetener cyclamate, which has been characterized by Jiang et al. (), is shown in Figure 1C. The key residues involved in recognizing different sweet substances and their structural properties are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Discussion
In this research, we carried out a comprehensive sequence, structure and function analysis of the sweet taste receptors-heterodimeric T1R2s/T1R3s in primates. Our results show well taxonomic distribution and classification of these receptors, as illustrated by phylogenetic tree and sequence similarity networks analysis (Figures 2–4). Furthermore, we reveal that the conservation/variation of molecular determinant residues of sweet taste receptors in primates, whose functions have been identified in previous mutagenesis experiments, can account for the previously reported behavioral or physiological results of sweet taste in primates toward several typical sweeteners to a large extent. These findings illuminate the relationships between the sequence/structure of sweet taste receptors in primates and their functional roles for taste perception. Nevertheless, a few exceptions were found that the prosimians Lemuriformes species, which were reported to have no sensitivity to aspartame in behavioral test (), harbor the similar aspartame-tasting determinative residues (D142 and S40) as aspartame tasters (Old World monkeys, great apes, gibbons and humans) (Figure 5). Our lab is now working on the function of T1R2/T1R3 in these prosimians species to unravel this intriguing discrepancy.
The sweet taste receptor belongs to the class C GPCRs. By quantitatively mapping the global network of amino acid interactions in GPCRs, a comparative analysis has revealed a conserved network of non-covalent contacts that defines the GPCR fold (named as “molecular signatures”) (Venkatakrishnan et al., 2013), and a small subset of residues forms physically connected networks (named as “protein sectors”) that link distant functional sites, while each sector has a distinct functional role (Süel et al., 2003; ). Therefore, the small subsets of residues responsible for the species-dependent taste toward sweeteners described in present study could be regarded as specific “protein sectors” or “molecular signatures” of sweet taste receptors. Furthermore, because sweet taste is a complex process involving many signal transduction pathways, we propose that future studies should apply multidisciplinary approaches in physiology, biochemistry, neuroscience, biophysics and evolutionary biology to elucidate the molecular mechanism of diversity, function and evolution of sweet taste receptors in primates as well as other mammals species (Yang et al., 2021). The schemes “molecular signatures” and “protein sectors” of GPCRs highlighted above thus could provide meaningful strategies for further investigation on these topics.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
CW and YL performed data curation and analysis. MC and BL designed the research, supervised the work and wrote the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970935) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020KC035).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1037966/full#supplementary-material
References
1
CaiC.JiangH.LiL.LiuT.SongX.LiuB. (2016). Characterization of the sweet taste receptor Tas1r2 from an Old world monkey species rhesus monkey and species-dependent activation of the monomeric receptor by an intense sweetener perillartine. Plos One11 (8), 0160079. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160079
2
ChéronJ. B.SoohooA.WangY.GolebiowskiJ.AntonczakS.JiangP.et al (2019). Conserved residues control the t1r3-specific allosteric signaling pathway of the mammalian sweet-taste receptor. Chem. senses44 (5), 303–310. 10.1093/chemse/bjz015
3
CuiM.JiangP.MailletE.MaxM.MargolskeeR. F.OsmanR. (2006). The heterodimeric sweet taste receptor has multiple potential ligand binding sites. Curr. Pharm. Des.12 (35), 4591–4600. 10.2174/138161206779010350
4
DanilovaV.DanilovY.RobertsT.TintiJ. M.NofreC.HellekantG. (2002). Sense of taste in a new world monkey, the common marmoset: Recordings from the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves. J. Neurophysiol.88 (2), 579–594. 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.579
5
DieterG.HenkV.BrouwerJ. N.DuboisG. E.Göran.H. (1992). Gustatory responses in primates to the sweetener aspartame and their phylogenetic implications. Chem. Senses17 (3), 325–335. 10.1093/chemse/17.3.325
6
GerltJ. A.BouvierJ. T.DavidsonD. B.ImkerH. J.SadkhinB.SlaterD. R.et al (2015). Enzyme function initiative-enzyme similarity tool (EFI-EST): A web tool for generating protein sequence similarity networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1854 (8), 1019–1037. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.04.015
7
GlaserD.HellekantG.BrouwerJ. N.van der WelH. (1978). The taste responses in primates to the proteins thaumatin and monellin and their phylogenetic implications. Folia Primatol.29 (1), 56–63. 10.1159/000155826
8
GlaserD.TintiJ. M.NofreC. (1995). Evolution of the sweetness receptor in primates. I. Why does alitame taste sweet in all prosimians and simians, and aspartame only in Old World simians?Chem. senses20 (5), 573–584. 10.1093/chemse/20.5.573
9
GlaserD.TintiJ. M.NofreC. (1998). Taste preference in nonhuman primates to compounds sweet in man. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.855, 169. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10561.x
10
HalabiN.RivoireO.LeiblerS.RanganathanR. (2009). Protein sectors: Evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell138 (4), 774–786. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.038
11
HellekantG.DanilovaV. (1996). Species differences toward sweeteners. Food Chem.56 (3), 323–328. 10.1016/0308-8146(96)00033-7
12
HellekantG.GlaserD.BrouwerJ.Vand. W. H. (1981). Gustatory responses in three prosimian and two simian primate species (tupaia glis, nycticebus coucang, galago senegalensis, callithrix jacchus jacchus and saguinus midas Niger) to six sweeteners and miraculin and their phylogenetic implications. Chem. Senses6 (3), 165–173. 10.1093/chemse/6.3.165
13
HellekantG.GlaserD.BrouwerJ.Vand. W. H. (1980). “Study of behavioural and neurophysiological experiments on the sweet taste of five primates,” in Olfaction and taste VII. Editor Van der StarreH. (Oxford, USA: IRL Press Ltd).
14
HellekantG.HladikC. M.DennysV.SimmenB.RobertsT. W.GlaserD.et al (1993). On the sense of taste in two malagasy primates (microcebus murinus and eulemur mongoz). Chem. Senses18 (3), 307–320. 10.1093/chemse/18.3.307
15
JiangP.CuiM.ZhaoB.LiuZ.SnyderL. A.BenardL. M.et al (2005a). Lactisole interacts with the transmembrane domains of human T1R3 to inhibit sweet taste. J. Biol. Chem.280 (15), 15238–15246. 10.1074/jbc.M414287200
16
JiangP.CuiM.ZhaoB.SnyderL. A.BenardL. M.OsmanR.et al (2005b). Identification of the cyclamate interaction site within the transmembrane domain of the human sweet taste receptor subunit T1R3. J. Biol. Chem.280 (40), 34296–34305. 10.1074/jbc.M505255200
17
JiangP.JiQ.LiuZ.SnyderL. A.BenardL. M.MargolskeeR. F.et al (2004). The cysteine-rich region of T1R3 determines responses to intensely sweet proteins. J. Biol. Chem.279 (43), 45068–45075. 10.1074/jbc.M406779200
18
JordanL. A.RyanM. J. (2015). The sensory ecology of adaptive landscapes. Biol. Lett.11 (5), 20141054. 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1054
19
KimU. K.BreslinP. A.ReedD.DraynaD. (2004). Genetics of human taste perception. J. Dent. Res.83 (6), 448–453. 10.1177/154405910408300603
20
KroghA.LarssonB.von HeijneG.SonnhammerE. L. (2001). Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol.305 (3), 567–580. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
21
LiX.BachmanovA. A.MaehashiK.LiW.LimR.BrandJ. G.et al (2011). Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species. Chem. senses36 (5), 453–475. 10.1093/chemse/bjq145
22
LiX.GlaserD.LiW.JohnsonW. E.O'BrienS. J.BeauchampG. K.et al (2009). Analyses of sweet receptor gene (Tas1r2) and preference for sweet stimuli in species of Carnivora. J. Hered100 (1), S90–S100. 10.1093/jhered/esp015
23
LiX.LiW.WangH.CaoJ.MaehashiK.HuangL.et al (2005). Pseudogenization of a sweet-receptor gene accounts for cats' indifference toward sugar. Plos Genet.1 (1), 27–35. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010003
24
LiX.StaszewskiL.XuH.DurickK.ZollerM.AdlerE. (2002). Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.99 (7), 4692–4696. 10.1073/pnas.072090199
25
LindemannB. (1996). Taste reception. Physiol. Rev.76 (3), 719–766. 10.1152/physrev.1996.76.3.719
26
LiuB.HaM.MengX. Y.KaurT.KhaleduzzamanM.ZhangZ.et al (2011). Molecular mechanism of species-dependent sweet taste toward artificial sweeteners. J. Neurosci.31 (30), 11070–11076. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0791-11.2011
27
LiuB.HaM.MengX. Y.KhaleduzzamanM.ZhangZ.LiX.et al (2012). Functional characterization of the heterodimeric sweet taste receptor T1R2 and T1R3 from a New World monkey species (squirrel monkey) and its response to sweet-tasting proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.427 (2), 431–437. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.09.083
28
LuthyR.BowieJ. U.EisenbergD. (1992). Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature356, 83–85. 10.1038/356083a0
29
MailletE. L.CuiM.JiangP.MezeiM.HechtE.QuijadaJ.et al (2015). Characterization of the binding site of aspartame in the human sweet taste receptor. Chem. senses40 (8), 577–586. 10.1093/chemse/bjv045
30
MasudaK.KoizumiA.NakajimaK.TanakaT.AbeK.MisakaT.et al (2012). Characterization of the modes of binding between human sweet taste receptor and low-molecular-weight sweet compounds. PloS one7 (4), 35380. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035380
31
MasudaT.TaguchiW.SanoA.OhtaK.KitabatakeN.TaniF. (2013). Five amino acid residues in cysteine-rich domain of human T1R3 were involved in the response for sweet-tasting protein, thaumatin. Biochimie95 (7), 1502–1505. 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.01.010
32
MitchellA.ChangH. Y.DaughertyL.FraserM.HunterS.LopezR.et al (2015). The InterPro protein families database: The classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res.43 , D213–D221. 10.1093/nar/gku1243
33
NelsonG.HoonM. A.ChandrashekarJ.ZhangY.RybaN. J.ZukerC. S. (2001). Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell106 (3), 381–390. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00451-2
34
NieY.ViguesS.HobbsJ. R.ConnG. L.MungerS. D. (2005). Distinct contributions of T1R2 and T1R3 taste receptor subunits to the detection of sweet stimuli. Curr. Biol.15 (21), 1948–1952. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.037
35
NishiE.Suzuki-HashidoN.HayakawaT.TsujiY.SuryobrotoB.ImaiH. (2018). Functional decline of sweet taste sensitivity of colobine monkeys. Primates59 (6), 523–530. 10.1007/s10329-018-0679-2
36
NofreC.TintiJ. M.GlaserD. (1996). Evolution of the sweetness receptor in primates. II. Gustatory responses of non-human primates to nine compounds known to be sweet in man. Chem. senses21 (6), 747–762. 10.1093/chemse/21.6.747
37
PereiraS.HendersonD.HjelmM.HårdT.Hernandez SalazarL. T.LaskaM. (2021). Taste responsiveness of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) to eight substances tasting sweet to humans. Physiol. Behav.238, 113470. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113470
38
PinJ. P.GalvezT.PrézeauL. (2003). Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol. Ther.98 (3), 325–354. 10.1016/s0163-7258(03)00038-x
39
PoelwijkF. J.KivietD. J.WeinreichD. M.TansS. J. (2007). Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature445 (7126), 383–386. 10.1038/nature05451
40
RivesM. L.VolC.FukazawaY.TinelN.TrinquetE.AyoubM. A.et al (2009). Crosstalk between GABA(B) and mGlu1a receptors reveals new insight into GPCR signal integration. EMBO J.28, 2195–2208. 10.1038/emboj.2009.177
41
SaitouN.NeiM. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol.4 (4), 406–425. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
42
SchillingA.DanilovaV.HellekantG. (2004). Behavioral study in the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) using compounds considered sweet by humans. Am. J. Primatol.62 (1), 43–48. 10.1002/ajp.20004
43
ShannonP.MarkielA.OzierO.BaligaN. S.WangJ. T.RamageD.et al (2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res.13 (11), 2498–2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303
44
SimonettiF. L.TeppaE.ChernomoretzA.NielsenM.Marino BusljeC. (2013). Mistic: Mutual information server to infer coevolution. Nucleic Acids Res.41, W8–W14. 10.1093/nar/gkt427
45
SüelG. M.LocklessS. W.WallM. A.RanganathanR. (2003). Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol.10 (1), 59–69. 10.1038/nsb881
46
TemussiP. A. (2011). Determinants of sweetness in proteins: A topological approach. J. Mol. Recognit.24 (6), 1033–1042. 10.1002/jmr.1152
47
ThompsonJ. D.HigginsD. G.GibsonT. J. (1994). Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res.22 (22), 4673–4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
48
van GiesenL.Hernandez-NunezL.Delasoie-BaranekS.ColomboM.RenaudP.BruggmannR.et al (2016). Multimodal stimulus coding by a gustatory sensory neuron in Drosophila larvae. Nat. Commun.7, 10687. 10.1038/ncomms10687
49
VenkatakrishnanA. J.DeupiX.LebonG.TateC. G.SchertlerG. F.BabuM. M. (2013). Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature494 (7436), 185–194. 10.1038/nature11896
50
WinnigM.BufeB.KratochwilN. A.SlackJ. P.MeyerhofW. (2007). The binding site for neohesperidin dihydrochalcone at the human sweet taste receptor. BMC Struct. Biol.7, 66. 10.1186/1472-6807-7-66
51
XuH.StaszewskiL.TangH.AdlerE.ZollerM.LiX. (2004). Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101 (39), 14258–14263. 10.1073/pnas.0404384101
52
YangL.CuiM.LiuB. (2021). Current progress in understanding the structure and function of sweet taste receptor. J. Mol. Neurosci.71 (2), 234–244. 10.1007/s12031-020-01642-4
53
YarmolinskyD. A.ZukerC. S.RybaN. J. (2009). Common sense about taste: From mammals to insects. Cell139 (2), 234–244. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.001
54
ZhaoG. Q.ZhangY.HoonM. A.ChandrashekarJ.ErlenbachI.RybaN. J.et al (2003). The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell115 (3), 255–266. 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00844-4
Summary
Keywords
primate, sweet taste receptor, taxonomic distribution, coevolution, epistasis, species-dependent sweet taste, molecular determinants
Citation
Wang C, Liu Y, Cui M and Liu B (2023) Systematic analysis reveals novel insight into the molecular determinants of function, diversity and evolution of sweet taste receptors T1R2/T1R3 in primates. Front. Mol. Biosci. 10:1037966. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1037966
Received
06 September 2022
Accepted
13 January 2023
Published
25 January 2023
Volume
10 - 2023
Edited by
Irina Sousa Moreira, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Reviewed by
Lim Heo, Michigan State University, United States
Giulia Morra, Giulio Natta Institute of Chemical Sciences and Technologies, Department of Chemical Sciences and Materials Technologies (CNR), Italy
Supriyo Bhattacharya, City of Hope National Medical Center, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wang, Liu, Cui and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Meng Cui, m.cui@northeastern.edu; Bo Liu, ertrdfgg@qlu.edu.cn
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Structural Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.