Abstract
Wilms tumor (WT) is a pediatric kidney cancer associated with poor outcomes in patients with unfavorable histological features such as anaplasia. Small non-coding RNAs, such as miRNAs, are known to be involved in WT pathogenesis. However, research on the clinical potential of blood-based miRNAs is limited. This study aimed to profile aberrantly expressed miRNAs in WT serum samples, evaluate their potential to differentiate standard-risk patients with favorable histology from those with anaplastic WTs, and assess their clinical value as minimally invasive biomarkers for WT detection. The study used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze miRNA expressions in serum samples from 37 Egyptian children, including 10 healthy individuals, 14 with non-anaplastic WTs (favorable histology FH-WTs), and 13 with anaplastic WTs (unfavorable histology UnFH-WTs). Functional enrichment analysis was conducted to identify critical pathways and biological processes affected by dysregulated miRNAs, and a network was created for the most promising miRNA-target interactions linked to WT. The study identified a distinct miRNA expression signature of 45 miRNAs (3 upregulated and 42 downregulated) in WT serum samples compared to healthy controls, with 29 miRNAs exclusively dysregulated in FH-WTs and 6 miRNAs dysregulated solely in UnFH-WTs. These dysregulated miRNAs displayed significant enrichment in cancer-related pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, FOXO, and MAPK signaling. In relation to WT clinicopathological features, decreased levels of hsa-miR-2355-3p showed a significant positive correlation with clinical stage (r = 0.6597, p = 0.0006) and WT metastasis (r = 0.439, p = 0.021). The ROC curve analysis revealed that multiple dysregulated miRNAs in WT, specifically hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, and hsa-miR-483-5p, exhibited high diagnostic potential for WT, with AUC values exceeding 0.86. Among WT histopathology types, the hsa-miR-1180-3p showed a 2.3 log2fold difference in expression between UnFH-WTs and FH-WTs, indicating its potential as a biomarker with 92% sensitivity and 85% specificity for identifying UnFH-WTs. Its target genes were enriched in pathways related to cell division and cell cycle regulation. In conclusion, hsa-miR-1180-3p could be a reliable blood-based biomarker for distinguishing WT histopathological types, and further research is needed to validate its clinical value.
Introduction
Wilms tumor (WT), also known as nephroblastoma, is a common renal malignancy in childhood, and its pathogenesis involves diverse genetic and epigenetic alterations ()., WTs are histopathologically classified into two main categories according to the Children Oncology Group (COG): anaplastic WTs with unfavorable histological features (such as focal and diffuse anaplasia) and non-anaplastic WTs with favorable histology and no presence of anaplasia (). The prognosis of the tumors is significantly influenced by their histopathological type (). Despite high survival rates, patients with unfavorable histology still exhibit poor outcomes and are at higher risk of kidney failure, disease recurrence, and death ().
The most observed genetic alterations in sporadic WTs include mutations in WTX, WT1, CTNNB1, and TP53, along with 11p15 imprinting abnormalities. However, these changes only account for approximately one-third of WT cases (). Recently, molecular profiling and whole-exome sequencing have identified novel genetic mutations in WT, including those in microRNA processing genes DROSHA, DGCR8, and DICER1. Mutations in these genes can impair tumor-suppressing miRNAs, such as the let-7 family, which regulate oncogenes MYCN and LIN28 in WT (; ).
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small noncoding RNAs with 20–22 long nucleotides, significantly control post-transcriptional gene regulation by binding to target mRNAs and either promoting their degradation or inhibiting translation. They are involved in biological processes, such as development, cell differentiation, and immune response (). Dysregulation of miRNAs has been linked to various diseases, including cancer; thus, they hold potential as both clinical biomarkers and therapeutic targets (). Deficiencies in miRNA processing genes were found to affect miRNA biogenesis and reprogramme miRNA expressions in WT (; ). In this context, previous studies have found aberrant miRNA expressions in both cell lines and clinical samples of WT using TaqMan Low-Density Array (TLDA), microarray and qRT-PCR profiling assays (; ; ). found miRNA expression differences in WTs vs. healthy embryonic kidney cells, while explored miRNA expressions and chemoresistance in high-risk blastemal WTs. Most of these studies have focused on analyzing aberrant miRNA expressions in WT tumor biopsies, with limited exploration into the clinical value of circulating miRNAs in predicting prognosis and histological subtyping. Over the past decade, researchers have focused on developing non-invasive biomarkers or liquid biopsies for various clinical purposes, and the stability of miRNA expressions in biofluids makes them promising non-invasive biomarkers ().The current study comprehensively profiled miRNA expression patterns in the serum of WT patients using NGS to explore their potential to discriminate standard-risk patients with favorable histology from those with high-risk features, such as anaplasia and assess their potential as minimally invasive biomarkers for WT detection. The study also evaluated key pathways and biological processes affected by these dysregulated miRNAs, providing insights into the underlying mechanisms driving tumorigenesis in WT.
Materials and methods
Patients and blood sample collection
The current study involved analyzing serum samples from 37 Egyptian children aged 1–8 years, including 10 healthy individuals, 14 having FH-WTs and 13 having UnFH-WTs). No congenital anomalies associated with WT were found in the study subjects. WT serum samples were obtained from the Biorepository at Children Cancer Hospital Egypt (CCHE), 57,357. These samples were collected from newly diagnosed patients at different disease stages before surgery and before receiving preoperative chemotherapy between 2022 and 2023. Histopathological assessment and staging of WT were determined following the pathology protocol of COG. The clinicopathological features of WT patients are detailed in (Supplementary Table S1). The study excluded patients with other renal cancers, kidney diseases, or any childhood malignancy. As a control group, 10 blood samples were obtained from age-matched healthy children during their periodic examination at the Borg El Arab Central Hospital, New Borg EL Arab City, Alexandria, Egypt. Children suffering from severe diseases, diabetes, or viral infections were excluded from the study. The present study has received approval from the Renal Study Team Meeting (STM), the Scientific Medical Advisory Committee (SMAC), and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of CCHE, 57,357 on 16 March 2023. Parents or legal guardians of healthy study participants have provided a written informed consent before enrollment in the study.
RNA isolation and quality assessment
All serum samples were treated with the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, catalog number 217004) to extract the total RNA enriched for small RNAs according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and quantity of purified RNA were evaluated using a NanoDrop™ One Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Furthermore, the integrity and size distribution of the extracted small RNAs were determined using the Agilent 2,100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., United States).
Library preparation and small RNA-sequencing
Barcoded cDNA libraries were generated from the purified small RNA transcripts using the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Set 1 for Illumina (New England BioLabs. Inc., United States). Following library preparation, PCR products were purified using QIAquick®PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and their quality was assessed on the Bioanalyzer 2,100 (Agilent Technologies, Germany) using the DNA High Sensitivity Kit (Agilent Technologies, Germany). The purified cDNA libraries were size selected using a 6% polyacrylamide gel and cleaned up using the AMPure bead clean-up protocol. The bands of 140 and 150 nucleotides correspond to adapter-ligated transcripts derived from 21 to 30 nucleotide RNA segments, mainly miRNAs and piRNAs. The size and purity of size-selected cDNA libraries were ultimately assessed on the LabChip GX Touch 24 Nucleic Acid Analyzer (PerkinElmer, United States), using the DNA NGS 3K kit (PerkinElmer, United States). The final concentration of each library was measured on the Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit DNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Invitrogen).
Finally, the libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts and subjected to the Illumina sequencing pipeline, which involved clonal cluster generation on a flow cell with 75-bp single-end reads and sequencing-by-synthesis on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer (Illumina Inc. United States) using MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina Inc. United States).
Bioinformatics analysis
Raw sequencing data was quality checked using FastQC (), and adapter sequences were trimmed using Cutadapt tool (). The results were compiled using MultiQC (). The quality-controlled reads underwent alignment to the human reference genome (GRCh38) using Bowtie 2 tool (, p. 2), allowing for up to two sequence mismatches. Subsequently, these reads were mapped to the RNAcentral database (release 23) (). Within this database, miRbase served as a reference for miRNAs, piRbase for piRNAs, and Genecard for other small RNAs. The resulting bam files containing sncRNAs were then quantified for each sample using FeatureCounts (). We applied specific parameters in FeatureCounts, including--minOverlap 15, --fracOverlap 0.95, and--fracOverlapFeature 0.95, to ensure accurate alignment with sncRNA annotations provided in the GFF3 file downloaded from RNAcentral.
The filtered read counts were input into the R/Bioconductor DESeq2 package () to identify differential expression of miRNAs between WT patients and healthy controls. The significance of the differential expression was based on an absolute log2 fold change (log2FC ≥ 1 or ≤ -1) and adjusted p-value of ≤0.05. The ggplot R package () was used to generate volcano plots from miRNA matrices in WTs, and to visualize differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) in lollipop plots. Heatmaps were generated from the normalized read count of DEmiRNAs using the complex Heatmap R package.
Pathway and functional enrichment analyses
Reactome pathway () and Gene Ontology (GO) () enrichment analyses of DEmiRNAs in WT were conducted using the DIANA-miRPath v4.0 platform (), a server designed for target-based analysis of miRNA functions. Experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions were sourced from the MiRTarBase database 2022 () and filtered based on strong interaction confidence annotation. The enriched terms were ranked based on p-value and a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of <0.05.
MiRNA-target interaction network analysis
A network for miRNA-target interactions was created using the online tool MIENTURNET () to identify the miRNA-target interactions involved in WT pathogenesis. Firstly, the list of WT-circulating DEmiRNAs obtained from miRNA-Seq were subjected to the MIENTURNET web tool, and the miRTarBase () was selected for miRNA-target enrichment analysis. The following MIENTURNET settings were applied to limit our network: an FDR cutoff of 0.05, a minimum of five miRNA-target interactions, and strong experimental evidence.
Statistical analysis
Statistical differences of dysregulated circulating miRNAs between experimental groups were evaluated by two-tailed t-test, with p-value <0.05 considered significantly dysregulated in WT. This cut-off was retained for our analyses. Further, Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using scikit learn library in the Python program to ascertain the diagnostic performance of analyzed miRNAs with a confidence interval of 95%. All statistical analysis was conducted in R studio (version 3.5.1). The Spearman Rank Correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between miRNA expression and clinicopathological variables related to WT.
Results
Clinicopathological data
All the subjects included in the study were from the Egyptian population, aged between 1 and 8 years, with a median diagnostic age of 3.5 years. Around 52% (14/27) of patients had FH-WTs, while 48% (13/27) had UnFH-WTs, with 3 having focal anaplasia and 10 identified as high-risk tumors with diffuse anaplasia (DAWTs). No congenital anomalies associated with WT were found in the study subjects. Approximately 15% (4/27) of patients had bilateral tumors, while the remaining cases had unilateral tumors with equal left and right-sided proportions. All WT patients were staged based on the COG pathological methodology, with 56% (15/27) of the children in clinical stage III, followed by 26% in stage IV (7/27), and 15% (4/27) in stage V. Among WT patients, 33% (9/27) had initial metastasis to the lung, while 67% (18/27) had non-metastatic tumors (Supplementary Table S1).
NGS data analysis and read mapping
Small RNA libraries were prepared, size-fractionated, and sequenced using NGS on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Raw reads were trimmed and filtered for quality control analysis, resulting in a median of 899,208 reads per sample (ranging from 0.7 to 1.5 million reads). NGS data analysis workflow is shown in (Figure 1). Mapping data to the RNA central database revealed that 14% of the total mapped reads were annotated as small ncRNAs. The distribution of the fraction of reads mapped to different ncRNAs were indicated in (Supplementary Figure S1; Supplementary Table S2). From the RNA central database, we obtained a comprehensive list of 1,007 annotated small ncRNAs, including 527 miRNAs commonly expressed in WT serum samples.
FIGURE 1
A distinct expression pattern of circulating miRNAs in WT patients versus healthy controls
The study revealed significant differential expressions of 45 miRNAs in the serum of WT patients compared to healthy controls, with 3 upregulated and 42 downregulated. The values of all expressed miRNAs and their corresponding adjusted p-values were shown in a volcano plot (Figure 2A). The significant DEmiRNAs in WT serum samples were visualized in a lollipop plot (Figure 2B). The expression levels of DEmiRNAs between WT cases and healthy controls were visually represented in a Heat Map (Figure 2C).
FIGURE 2
An expression analysis of miRNAs in WT histopathological types compared to healthy controls revealed 51 significantly dysregulated miRNAs in FH-WTs (50 downregulated and 1 upregulated, hsa-miR-483-5p), and 28 significantly dysregulated miRNAs in the UnFH-WTs (25 downregulated and 3 upregulated) (Supplementary Table S3). There was a difference in the number of uniquely expressed miRNAs in each histopathological type, with 29 miRNAs exclusively dysregulated in FH-WTs and 6 miRNAs dysregulated solely in UnFH-WTs, as seen in (Supplementary Figure S2). In addition, 22 miRNAs were commonly expressed in both WT types.
Differentiating between WT histopathology types, hsa-miR-1180-3p showed significant differential expression between UnFH-WTs and FH-WTs, with high expression in UnFH-WT patients. All dysregulated miRNAs between WT and healthy controls are listed in (Supplementary Table S3) and the top DEmiRNAs are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
| The top downregulated miRNAs in WT patients compared to healthy controls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH-WTs | UnFH-WTs | All WTs | ||||||
| miRNA | log2 FC | adj p-value | miRNA | log2 FC | p-value | miRNA | log2 FC | adj p-value |
| miR-134-5p | −2.58 | 0.0018 | miR-485-5p | −2.832 | 0.0244 | miR-2355-3p | −3.094 | 0.0413 |
| miR-20a-5p | −2.53 | 0.026 | miR-370-3p | −2.600 | 0.0019 | miR-134-5p | −2.550 | 0.0004 |
| miR-342-5p | −2.47 | 0.008 | miR-493-3p | −2.577 | 0.0255 | miR-370-3p | −2.399 | 0.0002 |
| miR-150-5p | −2.40 | 0.0017 | miR-148a-5p | −2.515 | 0.0054 | miR-485-5p | −2.332 | 0.0163 |
| miR-24-3p | −2.31 | 0.0005 | miR-134-5p | −2.508 | 0.0072 | miR-493-3p | −2.220 | 0.0132 |
| miR-370-3p | −2.23 | 0.002 | miR-1180-3p | −2.286 | 0.0276 | miR-432-5p | −2.191 | 0.0201 |
| miR-382-5p | −2.15 | 0.0129 | miR-99b-5p | −2.165 | 0.0115 | miR-382-5p | −2.079 | 0.0066 |
| miR-185-5p | −2.15 | 6.75E-06 | miR-150-5p | −2.082 | 0.0148 | miR-342-5p | −2.028 | 0.0124 |
| miR-432-5p | −2.12 | 0.0497 | miR-382-5p | −2.006 | 0.038 | miR-381-3p | −2.020 | 0.0021 |
| miR-181b-5p | −2.11 | 0.0260 | miR-381-3p | −1.933 | 0.0174 | miR-146a-5p | −1.994 | 1.85E-07 |
| miR-381-3p | −2.10 | 0.0039 | miR-146a-5p | −1.919 | 5.98E-05 | miR-181b-5p | −1.983 | 0.0155 |
| miR-146a-5p | −2.06 | 4.08E-06 | miR-744-5p | −1.894 | 0.0084 | miR-24-3p | −1.926 | 0.0011 |
| miR-151a-3p | −1.99 | 0.0004 | miR-93-5p | −1.716 | 0.0271 | miR-744-5p | −1.877 | 0.0009 |
| miR-101-3p | −1.96 | 0.0028 | miR-425-5p | −1.695 | 0.0401 | miR-148a-5p | −1.801 | 0.0127 |
| miR-4433b-3p | −1.95 | 0.0280 | miR-22-3p | −1.664 | 0.0072 | miR-4732-5p | −1.795 | 0.0498 |
| let-7e-5p | −1.95 | 0.0379 | miR-24-3p | −1.601 | 0.0296 | -miR-93-5p | −1.792 | 0.0044 |
| The top upregulated miRNAs in WT patients compared to healthy controls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH-WTs | UnFH-WTs | All WTs | ||||||
| miRNA | log2 FC | Adj p-value | miRNA | log2 FC | adj p-value | miRNA | log2 FC | adj p-value |
| miR-483-5p | 2.8734 | 2.16E-05 | miR-10a-5p | 1.1448 | 0.0178 | miR-10b-5p | 1.0393 | 0.0176 |
| miR-10b-5p | 1.3799 | 0.0072 | miR-483-5p | 2.5771 | 5.18E-05 | |||
| miR-483-5p | 2.1709 | 0.006 | miR-10b-3p | 2.9918 | 0.0395 | |||
| Differential expression of miRNAs between WT histopathology types | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiRNA | log2 FC | adj p-value | Change | Comparison |
| hsa-miR-1180-3p | 2.28678 | 0.027661 | Up | UnFH-WT vs.FH-WT |
The top differentially expressed miRNAs in the serum of WT patients compared to healthy controls.
Pathway and functional enrichment analysis of circulating DEmiRNAs in WT
The Reactome pathway analysis indicated that the target genes of 45 DEmiRNAs in WT are significantly enriched in the immune system signaling by interleukins and cytokines, suggesting a potential link between miRNA dysregulation and immune response modulation in WT development. Additionally, these genes are highly enriched in cancer-related pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, FOXO, and MAPK signaling pathways (Figure 3A). These pathways are essential for WT pathogenesis. The GO analysis revealed that DEmiRNAs in WT were involved in biological processes related to regulating transcription by RNA pol II, gene expression, apoptotic process, response to hypoxia and cell proliferation. These genes were also implicated in molecular functions, including protein binding, phosphorylation, and kinase activity. Regarding cellular component ontology, the validated target genes were primarily enriched in nucleoplasm, cytoplasm, nucleus, and cytosol (Figure 3B). The top 20 Reactome and GO enriched terms of DEmiRNAs in WT are listed in Table 2.
FIGURE 3
TABLE 2
| Reactome pathway | Term Genes | Target Genes (n) | miRNAs (n) | P-value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signaling by Interleukins | 512 | 104 | 29 | 2.20E-37 | 5.28E-34 |
| Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases | 528 | 101 | 28 | 6.38E-34 | 7.66E-31 |
| Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-13 signaling | 122 | 50 | 26 | 9.68E-34 | 7.75E-31 |
| Signal Transduction | 3,138 | 285 | 39 | 2.49E-32 | 1.50E-29 |
| Cytokine Signaling in Immune system | 1,050 | 143 | 32 | 3.36E-31 | 1.61E-28 |
| Diseases of signal transduction by growth factor receptors and second messengers | 415 | 82 | 28 | 1.68E-28 | 6.71E-26 |
| Generic Transcription Pathway | 1,372 | 144 | 35 | 8.41E-20 | 2.88E-17 |
| PI3K/AKT Signaling in Cancer | 103 | 33 | 23 | 1.01E-18 | 3.04E-16 |
| ESR-mediated signaling | 226 | 48 | 27 | 2.54E-18 | 6.77E-16 |
| Extracellular matrix organization | 318 | 57 | 21 | 6.77E-18 | 1.63E-15 |
| Gene expression (Transcription) | 1,661 | 158 | 35 | 1.27E-17 | 2.77E-15 |
| Extra-nuclear estrogen signaling | 78 | 28 | 22 | 1.46E-17 | 2.92E-15 |
| Signaling by NTRKs | 137 | 36 | 20 | 3.66E-17 | 6.76E-15 |
| RNA Polymerase II Transcription | 1,509 | 145 | 35 | 1.89E-16 | 3.24E-14 |
| Disease | 1,819 | 164 | 34 | 4.35E-16 | 6.97E-14 |
| Signaling by Nuclear Receptors | 318 | 54 | 28 | 6.04E-16 | 9.06E-14 |
| FOXO-mediated transcription | 67 | 24 | 20 | 3.26E-15 | 4.61E-13 |
| Negative regulation of the PI3K/AKT network | 117 | 31 | 18 | 4.62E-15 | 6.17E-13 |
| Signaling by NTRK1 (TRKA) | 118 | 31 | 19 | 5.99E-15 | 7.56E-13 |
| MAPK family signaling cascades | 360 | 56 | 24 | 8.91E-15 | 1.07E-12 |
| Gene Ontology (GO) | Term Genes | Target Genes (n) | miRNAs (n) | P-value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| protein binding | 14,297 | 638 | 41 | 1.01E-61 | 1.90E-57 |
| positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II | 1,258 | 167 | 33 | 2.27E-60 | 2.13E-56 |
| negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II | 896 | 130 | 35 | 9.77E-51 | 6.11E-47 |
| positive regulation of gene expression | 519 | 100 | 34 | 3.41E-50 | 1.60E-46 |
| negative regulation of apoptotic process | 604 | 106 | 35 | 3.77E-49 | 1.41E-45 |
| cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 319 | 75 | 27 | 4.88E-44 | 1.53E-40 |
| positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated | 663 | 103 | 32 | 1.09E-42 | 2.92E-39 |
| Nucleoplasm | 4,107 | 281 | 37 | 1.45E-42 | 3.39E-39 |
| protein phosphorylation | 654 | 102 | 32 | 2.00E-42 | 4.16E-39 |
| Cytoplasm | 7,391 | 404 | 40 | 5.67E-42 | 1.06E-38 |
| identical protein binding | 1,679 | 160 | 32 | 1.46E-38 | 2.49E-35 |
| apoptotic process | 765 | 104 | 29 | 9.54E-38 | 1.49E-34 |
| protein kinase activity | 560 | 88 | 31 | 7.97E-37 | 1.15E-33 |
| positive regulation of cell population proliferation | 602 | 91 | 31 | 1.07E-36 | 1.43E-33 |
| transcription factor binding | 401 | 74 | 29 | 8.42E-36 | 1.05E-32 |
| positive regulation of apoptotic process | 404 | 74 | 27 | 1.42E-35 | 1.67E-32 |
| protein kinase binding | 501 | 81 | 33 | 8.10E-35 | 8.93E-32 |
| response to hypoxia | 178 | 51 | 23 | 9.63E-35 | 1.00E-31 |
| Nucleus | 7,177 | 377 | 39 | 1.47E-33 | 1.45E-30 |
| negative regulation of gene expression | 334 | 64 | 28 | 4.86E-32 | 4.55E-29 |
The top 20 Reactome and GO enriched terms of target genes regulated by the DEmiRNAs in WT.
The most promising miRNA-target interactions linked to WT
The MIENTURNET results of miRNA-target enrichment analysis revealed that 42 downregulated miRNAs in WT were targeting 198 genes, with ZCCHC14 and MYC having the highest number of miRNA interactions (Figure 4A). Three upregulated miRNAs targeted 8 genes, with PHF20 and API5 being the most significantly affected hub genes (Figure 4B). The network of the most promising miRNA-target interactions showed that several tumor suppressor and oncogenic miRNAs target and regulate critical genes, including MYC, CREB1, TIMP3, CCNE1, and TGFB1, which were shown to be involved in WT pathogenesis (Figure 4C).
FIGURE 4
Correlation of circulating miRNA expressions with the advanced clinicopathological features of WT
The association between miRNA expression in WT serum samples and clinicopathological factors related to WT was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation test. The study findings indicated a significant positive correlation between the presence of initial metastasis and the decreased expression levels of hsa-miR-423-5p (r = 0.403, p = 0.036), hsa-miR-2355-3p (r = 0.439, p = 0.021), and hsa-miR-769–5 (r = 0.409, p = 0.034). Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between the lowered expression levels of hsa-miR-2355-3p (r = 0.6597, p = 0.0006) and hsa-miR-103a-3p (r = 0.4515, p = 0.0305) and the clinical stage of WT. The occurrence of bilateral kidney tumors was found to be positively correlated with lower levels of hsa-miR-342-5p (r = 0.3933, p = 0.04242). The relationship between miRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics is shown in (Supplementary Table S4).
Diagnostic potential of circulating DEmiRNAs in WT
The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that, among miRNAs, 13 downregulated miRNAs and 3 upregulated miRNAs exhibited high AUC (Area under the ROC curve) values exceeding 0.8 and 0.7, respectively, indicating high specificity and sensitivity for WT detection. (Figures 5A, B). Among the 3 upregulated miRNAs, hsa-miR-483-5p showed the highest AUC value of 0.867, while out of the 13 downregulated miRNAs, hsa-miR-7-5p and hsa-miR-146a-5p demonstrated the highest AUC values of 0.95 and 0.926, respectively. These miRNAs may serve as potential biomarkers for WT detection due to their strong discriminatory power. ROC curves of significant upregulated and downregulated miRNAs with the highest AUC values were shown in (Supplementary Table S5).
FIGURE 5
The potential of circulating hsa-miR-1180-3p to differentiate between anaplastic and non-anaplastic WT histopathology types and its functional enrichment
The study analyzed the differences in miRNA expressions and AUC values between FH-WT and UnFH-WTs to determine the potential of circulating miRNAs for distinguishing between WT histopathology types. The results have revealed that hsa-miR-1180-3p was the only miRNA that showed significant differential expression between the two groups. It is highly expressed in UnFH-WT patients compared to FH-WTs, with a log2 FC of 2.3 and an adjusted p-value of 0.027 (Figures 6A, B). The hsa-miR-1180-3p has also displayed high AUC value of 0.887, sensitivity of 92%, and specificity of 85% for detecting UnFH-WTs (Figure 6C), suggesting its potential as a non-invasive biomarker for differentiating between these two histology types of WTs.
FIGURE 6
The analysis of Reactome and GO enrichment revealed that hsa-miR-1180-3p target genes are highly enriched in pathways related to microtubule cytoskeleton organization, centrosome maturation, regulation of G2/M transition in cell cycle, and basal body-plasma membrane docking. These results suggest the potential role of hsa-miR-1180-3p in cell division, cell cycle and anaplasia progression in WT (Figure 6D). The top 20 Reactome and GO enriched terms of hsa-miR-1180-3p target genes are shown in (Supplementary Table S6).
Discussion
Wilms’ tumor is a childhood kidney cancer that primarily affects children under 5 years old. Despite improvements in treatment and survival rates for patients with unilateral tumors or favorable histology, those with anaplastic features or bilateral tumors still exhibit poor prognosis and worse outcomes () Previous surveys have found abnormal miRNA expressions in WT, indicating their involvement in WT pathogenesis (; ; ).This study is the first to employ next-generation sequencing methodology to create a comprehensive circulating miRNA profile in WT and evaluate their potential as blood-based biomarkers to differentiate between favorable and unfavorable histology.
The circulating miRNAs in WT were previously reported, in some previous studies (; ; ; ; ), conducted collectively on 280 samples of serum, plasma, and whole blood from 172 WT patients and 108 healthy controls using microarray and RT-PCR profiling assays. These previous studies (; ; ; ; ) reported 301 dysregulated miRNAs, with 144 upregulated, 143 downregulated, and 14 inconsistent. While the present study identified 45 miRNAs with significant differential expressions in WT serum samples, 18 of which were previously reported and 27 were uniquely identified in this study (Supplementary Figure S3; Supplementary Table S7).
Out of 18 miRNAs that were previously detected by microarray and RT-PCR profiling assays (Supplementary Table S7), hsa-miR-483-5p, hsa-miR-10b-3p, and hsa-miR-10b-5, were found to be upregulated in WT patients’ serum, aligning with previous studies (; ), indicating their oncogenic role in WT progression. Overexpression of miR-483-5p, a miRNA embedded within the IGF2 gene, has been linked to increased cell growth, invasion, and decreased cell death in WT cell lines (). The co-expression pattern of miR-483-5p and IGF2 indicates its involvement in WT tumorigenesis alongside IGF2 (). Furthermore, the miRNA-10 family has been found to induce Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition (EMT) through the PTEN/Akt pathway in renal fibrosis (), indicating a possible link between these miRNAs and WT progression. Furthermore, our data has confirmed the significant downregulation of several circulating miRNAs, specifically hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, hsa-miR-363-3p, hsa-miR-151a-3p, and hsa-miR-127-3p, which aligns with previous studies (; ), suggesting their tumor-suppressive roles in WT.
The observed imbalance between upregulated and downregulated miRNAs in WTs aligns with prior research, indicating that miRNA biogenesis is frequently disrupted in cancer, leading to global miRNA suppression in tumor cells compared to normal tissue. Mutational analysis has shown that DROSHA and DICER1 mutations, commonly found in Wilms tumors, impair miRNA processing. Specifically, DROSHA mutations lead to global downregulation of miRNAs, while DICER1 mutations selectively disrupt the processing of 5′-arm miRNAs (; ; ; ). This suppression affects tumor-suppressing miRNAs, including members of the let-7 family. In our study, several let-7 miRNAs, such as miR-7-5p, let-7e-5p, let-7i-5p, let-7g-5p, and let-7a-5p, were notably downregulated. These disruptions in miRNA maturation may contribute to impaired kidney differentiation and tumorigenesis in WTs.
In the serum of WT patients, 27 miRNAs were uniquely identified in our study (Supplementary Table S7), among which, hsa-miR-2355-3p, hsa-miR-493-3p hsa-miR-134-5p, hsa-miR-370-3p, hsa-miR-485-5p, hsa-miR-432-5p, hsa-miR-382-5p, hsa-miR-342-5p, and hsa-miR-381-3p, exhibited significant downregulation with log2fold changes ≤ −2 in WT patients. Especially, hsa-miR-2355-3p exhibited the most substantial decrease in WT serum and demonstrated a significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) with clinical stage and initial metastasis in WT patients. These results verify that the lowered expression of hsa-miR-2355-3p is closely associated with advanced WT clinicopathological features, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for predicting the progression and severity of WT. Further investigation is needed to understand its mechanisms in WT development and metastasis. In other studies, on the other hand, miR-2355 levels were found to be increased in in the serum of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients and correlated with poor prognosis (). This suggests that the role of miR-2355 depends on the cancer subtype.
The number of uniquely expressed miRNAs was found to vary among histopathological WT types. Six miRNAs, namely, hsa-miR-485-5p, hsa-miR-493-3p, hsa-miR-148a-5p, hsa-miR-99b-5p, hsa-miR-10a-5p and hsa-miR-10b-5p, were found to be dysregulated only in UnFH-WTs, indicating their involvement in unfavorable WT progressionNotably, hsa-miR-485-5p, hsa-miR-493-3p and hsa-miR-148a-5p are newly identified in WT serum samples). A previous bioinformatic analysis of the TP53 signaling pathway in WT revealed that many target genes of hsa-miR-485-5p function as regulators of this pathway (). Additionally, 80% of WTs with diffuse anaplasia have mutations in the TP53 gene (). These findings support the potential role of hsa-miR-485-5p in UnFH-WT development by affecting TP53. The hsa-miR-493-3p has already been reported as a tumor suppressor in various cancer types (). The miR-148a downregulation has been found to be associated with inhibiting EMT and tumor growth in several malignancies (). The miR-99b-5p low expression in our study, contradicts previous study which showed elevated levels in WT serum samples (). The inconsistency could be attributed to differences in patient populations, WT subtypes and detection assay. The high expression pattern of miR-10a in nephron progenitors was found to correlate with an early decline in nephron progenitors, increased apoptosis, and premature disruption of nephrogenesis (). This finding suggests that miR-10a may contribute to WT pathogenesis by disrupting normal nephrogenesis process.
The Reactome pathway analysis has shown that the circulating DEmiRNAs in WT are significantly enriched in various cancer-related pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT, FOXO, and MAPK signaling pathways. These pathways have been recently investigated in WT pathogenesis. The PI3K-AKT-p53 axis has been found to promote WT tumorigenesis (). The FOXO signaling pathway is crucial for various cellular functions, such as DNA damage repair, apoptosis, and oxidative stress (). FOXO3a, a tumor suppressor gene, has been observed to inhibit growth and invasion of nephroblastoma cells by disrupting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway ().The MAPK pathway has been found to be involved kidney growth, branching of the Ureteric Bud, and nephric duct connection to the cloaca. It is also involved in nephrogenesis control (). The GO analysis has revealed that circulating DEmiRNAs in WT target critical genes involved in biological processes such as apoptosis, gene expression, and transcription. These genes, including TP53, IGF1R, IGF1, WNT1, MMP9, VEGFA, BCL2, BMP4, PTEN, NOTCH2, and FAS, have been implicated in tumor progression.
The miRNA-target interaction network showed that several tumor suppressor miRNAs identified in our study, such as hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, hsa-miR-29a-3p and hsa-miR-185-5p, target multiple critical genes, including MYC, CREB1, TIMP3, CCNE1, and TGFB1, which were also shown to be involved in WT pathogenesis.
The study found significant positive correlations (p < 0.05) between miRNA expression and clinical and pathological characteristics in WTs. Reduced expression levels of hsa-miR-423-5p, hsa-miR-2355-3p, and hsa-miR-769-5p were significantly associated with initial metastasis, while decreased levels of hsa-miR-2355-3p and hsa-miR-103a-3p were positively correlated with clinical stage. The incidence of bilateral kidney tumors was associated with lower levels of hsa-miR-342-5p. Overall, these findings highlight the potential role of specific miRNAs in predicting the progression and metastasis of WT. In previous studies, these miRNAs have been found to play significant roles in the progression of various cancers, such as breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and cervical cancer (; ; ; ), promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and correlated with adverse clinicopathological characteristics related to these cancers.
The ROC analysis has indicated that three upregulated miRNAs, hsa-miR-10b-3p, hsa-miR-10b-5p and hsa-miR-483-5p, have high diagnostic potential for WT, consistent with previous study () which demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity rates of these miRNAs. The hsa-miR-483-5p has been linked to chemoresistance and poor prognosis in WT tissues, indicating its potential as a prognostic marker (). Additionally, 13 downregulated miRNAs showed high diagnostic performance for WT, with hsa-miR-7-5p and hsa-miR-146a-5p showing the highest AUC values exceeding 0.9, indicating their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for WT diagnosis. The hsa-miR-146a-5p was proposed as a biomarker for distinguishing between WT and diffuse hyperplastic perilobar nephroblastomatosis (DHPLN) due to its downregulation during malignization ().
This study assessed the potential of DEmiRNAs to differentiate between favorable and unfavorable WT subtypes two major histopathology types of WT. The circulating hsa-miR-1180-3p showed a significant differential expression with a 2.3 log2 fold difference in expression betweenUnFH-WTs and FH-WTs. This miRNA also displayed high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (85%) rates for detecting UnFH-WTs, suggesting its potential as a blood-based biomarker for identifying poor prognostic subtypes of WT. A previous study revealed that upregulation of miR-1180-5p in WT tissues positively correlates with histological type, stage, and lymph node metastasis. The inhibition of miR-1180 reduced WT growth and induced apoptosis in vivo by targeting p73 (). This miRNA may function as an oncogene or tumor suppressor in many tumors (; ). The miR-1180-3p overexpression has been found to enhance cell division and glycolysis in ovarian cancer cells through the SFRP1/Wnt signaling pathway (). Moreover, it stimulates cell growth, migration, and infiltration in lung cancer through the Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/AKT pathways (). MiR-1180-3p has also been identified as a potential diagnostic indicator for multiple cancers, including melanoma and gastric cancer (; ).
The Reactome pathway analysis of miR-1180-3p revealed that its target genes are highly enriched in pathways related to essential cellular processes, such as cell division and cell cycle regulation. Dysregulation of these pathways can lead to abnormal cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, highlighting the potential importance of miR-1180-3p in the development of diffuse anaplasia and unfavorable histological features in WT. Further validation is needed to confirm its regulatory mechanisms in WT signaling pathways.
Conclusion
The study has identified a distinct signature of 45 DEmiRNAs in the serum of WT patients compared to healthy controls, with 27 miRNAs that were newly detected. The hsa-miR-7-5p, hsa-miR-146a-5p, hsa-miR-378a-3p, and hsa-miR-483-5p have shown the highest discriminatory power, indicating their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for WT diagnosis. The expression of hsa-miR-2355-3p has not been previously identified in WT serum and its decreased expression has been significantly linked to advanced WT clinicopathological features, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for predicting WT progression and severity. The significant upregulation of hsa-miR-1180-3p in UnFH-WT patients could serve as a reliable blood-based biomarker for distinguishing between favorable and unfavorableWT subtypes. Further research with a larger sample size is warranted to validate these findings and explore potential therapeutic targets for unfavorable WTs. Investigating the mechanisms by which hsa-miR-1180-3p regulate cell division and cell cycle could provide a deeper understanding of its role in WT pathogenesis.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, SRA repository, BioProject database ID PRJNA1112148.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Children’s Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
FM: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing–original draft. DJ: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. YF: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. SE-M: Supervision, Writing–review and editing. WK: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing. AS: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. MG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The publication charges are covered by the Children’s Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 (CCHE 57357).
Acknowledgments
We extend our appreciation to the Biorepository and Biospecimen Research Unit at Children’s Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357 for their indispensable support in sample collection. Fatma S. Mohamed acknowledges the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of the Republic of Egypt for providing a Ph.D. scholarship at Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1453562/full#supplementary-material
Glossary
- API5
apoptosis inhibitor 5
- BCL2
BCL2 apoptosis regulator
- BMP4
bone morphogenetic protein 4
- CCNE1
cyclin E1
- COG
Children Oncology Group
- CREB1
cAMP responsive element binding protein 1
- CTNNB1
Catenin Beta 1
- DEmiRNAs
Differentially expressed miRNAs
- DGCR8
DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8
- DHPLN
diffuse hyperplastic perilobar nephroblastomatosis
- EMT
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition
- FAS
Fas cell surface death receptor
- FDR
False Discovery rate
- FH-WTs
Favorable histology Wilms tumor)
- FOXO
The mammalian forkhead transcription factors of the O class
- GO
Gene Ontology
- GRCh38
Human Reference Genome
- ICH GCP
International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP)
- IGF1
insulin like growth factor 1
- IGF1R
insulin like growth factor 1 receptor
- IGF2
insulin like growth factor 2
- IRB
Institutional Review Board
- LIN28
Lin-28 homolog A
- LUAD
lung adenocarcinoma
- MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinases
- MIENTURNET
MIcroRNA Enrichment TURned NETwork
- MMP9
matrix metallopeptidase 9
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- NGS
Next-generation sequencing
- NOTCH2
notch receptor 2
- PHF20
PHD Finger Protein 20
- PI3K
phosphoinositide-3-kinase
- pol II
RNA polymerase II
- PTEN
phosphatase and tensin homolog
- qRT-PCR
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
- ROC
Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis
- SFRP1
secreted frizzled related protein 1
- SMAC
Scientific Medical Advisory Committee
- SRA
Sequence Read Archive data
- STM
Renal Study Team Meeting
- TGFB1
transforming growth factor beta 1
- TIMP3
TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3
- TLDA
TaqMan Low-Density Array
- TP53
Tumor protein P53
- UnFH-WTs
Unfavorable histology Wilms tumor
- VEGFA
vascular endothelial growth factor A
- WNT1
Wnt family member 1
- WT
Wilms tumor
- WT1
Wilms Tumor Gene 1
- WTX
Wilms Tumor Gene on X Chromosome
- ZCCHC14
Zinc Finger CCHC-Type Containing 14
References
1
AndersenG. B.TostJ. (2020). “Circulating miRNAs as biomarker in cancer,” in Tumor liquid biopsies. Editors SchaffnerF.MerlinJ.-L.von BubnoffN. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 277–298. 10.1007/978-3-030-26439-0_15
2
AndrewsS. (2010). FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data.
3
BenlhachemiS.AbouqalR.ColemanN.MurrayM. J.KhattabM.El FahimeE. (2023). Circulating microRNA profiles in Wilms tumour (WT): a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Noncoding RNA Res.8, 413–425. 10.1016/j.ncrna.2023.05.007
4
BhutaniN.KajalP.SharmaU. (2021). Many faces of Wilms Tumor: recent advances and future directions. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond)64, 102202. 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102202
5
ChenE.-G.ZhangJ.-S.XuS.ZhuX.-J.HuH.-H. (2017). Long non-coding RNA DGCR5 is involved in the regulation of proliferation, migration and invasion of lung cancer by targeting miR-1180. Am. J. Cancer Res.7, 1463–1475.
6
CsókÁ.MicsikT.MagyarZ.TornóczkyT.KuthiL.NishiY.et al (2023). Alterations of miRNA expression in diffuse hyperplastic perilobar nephroblastomatosis: mapping the way to understanding Wilms’ tumor development and differential diagnosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 8793. 10.3390/ijms24108793
7
DaiT.ZhaoX.LiY.YuL.LiY.ZhouX.et al (2020). miR-423 promotes breast cancer invasion by activating NF-κB signaling. Onco Targets Ther.13, 5467–5478. 10.2147/OTT.S236514
8
EijkelenboomA.BurgeringB. M. T. (2013). FOXOs: signalling integrators for homeostasis maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.14, 83–97. 10.1038/nrm3507
9
EwelsP.MagnussonM.LundinS.KällerM. (2016). MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics32, 3047–3048. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
10
Gene Ontology ConsortiumClarkJ.IrelandA.LomaxJ.AshburnerM.FoulgerR.et al (2004). The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res.32, D258–D261. 10.1093/nar/gkh036
11
GengG.LiQ.GuoX.NiQ.XuY.MaZ.et al (2022). FOXO3a-modulated DEPDC1 promotes malignant progression of nephroblastoma via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep.26, 272–310. 10.3892/mmr.2022.12788
12
GillespieM.JassalB.StephanR.MilacicM.RothfelsK.Senff-RibeiroA.et al (2022). The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res.50, D687–D692. 10.1093/nar/gkab1028
13
GuoY.ZhangX.WangL.LiM.ShenM.ZhouZ.et al (2021). The plasma exosomal miR-1180-3p serves as a novel potential diagnostic marker for cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Cell Int.21, 487. 10.1186/s12935-021-02164-8
14
HeC.QinH.TangH.YangD.LiY.HuangZ.et al (2020). Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of the TP53 signaling pathway in Wilms’ tumor. Ann. Transl. Med.8, 1228. 10.21037/atm-20-6047
15
HoJ.PandeyP.SchattonT.Sims-LucasS.KhalidM.FrankM. H.et al (2011). The pro-apoptotic protein Bim is a microRNA target in kidney progenitors. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.22, 1053–1063. 10.1681/ASN.2010080841
16
HuJ.ZhaoW.HuangY.WangZ.JiangT.WangL. (2019). MiR-1180 from bone marrow MSCs promotes cell proliferation and glycolysis in ovarian cancer cells via SFRP1/Wnt pathway. Cancer Cell Int.19, 66. 10.1186/s12935-019-0751-z
17
HuangH.-Y.LinY.-C.-D.CuiS.HuangY.TangY.XuJ.et al (2022). miRTarBase update 2022: an informative resource for experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res.50, D222–D230. 10.1093/nar/gkab1079
18
HuangL.HuangL.LiZ.WeiQ. (2019). Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential of miR-493 in cancer. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.29, 521–528. 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2019030056
19
JiangX.LiH. (2018). MiR-1180-5p regulates apoptosis of Wilms’ tumor by targeting p73. Onco Targets Ther.11, 823–831. 10.2147/OTT.S148684
20
KabekkoduS. P.ShuklaV.VargheseV. K.AdigaD.Vethil JishnuP.ChakrabartyS.et al (2020). Cluster miRNAs and cancer: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic opportunities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA11, e1563. 10.1002/wrna.1563
21
KurtzebornK.KwonH. N.KuureS. (2019). MAPK/ERK signaling in regulation of renal differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 1779. 10.3390/ijms20071779
22
LangmeadB.SalzbergS. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods9, 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923
23
LiC.JinW.ZhangD.TianS. (2021). Clinical significance of microRNA-1180-3p for colorectal cancer and effect of its alteration on cell function. Bioengineered12, 10491–10500. 10.1080/21655979.2021.1997694
24
LiY.DengX.ZengX.PengX. (2016). The role of mir-148a in cancer. J. Cancer7, 1233–1241. 10.7150/jca.14616
25
LiaoY.SmythG. K.ShiW. (2014). featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics30, 923–930. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656
26
LicursiV.ConteF.FisconG.PaciP. (2019). MIENTURNET: an interactive web tool for microRNA-target enrichment and network-based analysis. BMC Bioinforma.20, 545. 10.1186/s12859-019-3105-x
27
LiuK.HeB.XuJ.LiY.GuoC.CaiQ.et al (2019). miR-483-5p targets MKNK1 to suppress Wilms’ tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Med. Sci. Monit.25, 1459–1468. 10.12659/MSM.913005
28
LoveM. I.HuberW.AndersS. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15, 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
29
LudwigN.Nourkami-TutdibiN.BackesC.LenhofH.-P.GrafN.KellerA.et al (2015). Circulating serum miRNAs as potential biomarkers for nephroblastoma. Pediatr. Blood and Cancer62, 1360–1367. 10.1002/pbc.25481
30
LuoX.DongJ.HeX.ShenL.LongC.LiuF.et al (2020). MiR-155-5p exerts tumor-suppressing functions in Wilms tumor by targeting IGF2 via the PI3K signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother.125, 109880. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109880
31
MaN.WangX.QiaoY.LiF.HuiY.ZouC.et al (2011). Coexpression of an intronic microRNA and its host gene reveals a potential role for miR-483-5p as an IGF2 partner. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.333, 96–101. 10.1016/j.mce.2010.11.027
32
MartinM. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.J.17, 10–12. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
33
MaschiettoM.WilliamsR. D.ChagtaiT.PopovS. D.SebireN. J.VujanicG.et al (2014). TP53 mutational status is a potential marker for risk stratification in Wilms tumour with diffuse anaplasia. PLoS One9, e109924. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109924
34
MurrayM. J.RabyK. L.SainiH. K.BaileyS.WoolS. V.TunnacliffeJ. M.et al (2015). Solid tumors of childhood display specific serum microRNA profiles. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.24, 350–360. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0669
35
NelsonM. V.van den Heuvel-EibrinkM. M.GrafN.DomeJ. S. (2021). New approaches to risk stratification for Wilms tumor. Curr. Opin. Pediatr.33, 40–48. 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000988
36
PaterL.MelchiorP.RübeC.CooperB. T.McAleerM. F.KalapurakalJ. A.et al (2021). Wilms tumor. Pediatr. Blood Cancer68 (Suppl. 2), e28257. 10.1002/pbc.28257
37
Pérez-LinaresF. J.Pérezpeña-DiazcontiM.García-QuintanaJ.Baay-GuzmánG.Cabrera-MuñozL.Sadowinski-PineS.et al (2020). MicroRNA profiling in Wilms tumor: identification of potential biomarkers. Front. Pediatr.8, 337. 10.3389/fped.2020.00337
38
RakhejaD.ChenK. S.LiuY.ShuklaA. A.SchmidV.ChangT.-C.et al (2014). Somatic mutations in DROSHA and DICER1 impair microRNA biogenesis through distinct mechanisms in Wilms tumours. Nat. Commun.5, 4802. 10.1038/ncomms5802
39
RenL.YangJ.MengX.ZhangJ.ZhangY. (2022). The promotional effect of microRNA-103a-3p in cervical cancer cells by regulating the ubiquitin ligase FBXW7 function. Hum. Cell35, 472–485. 10.1007/s13577-021-00649-2
40
SaliminejadK.Khorram KhorshidH. R.Soleymani FardS.GhaffariS. H. (2019). An overview of microRNAs: biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J. Cell Physiol.234, 5451–5465. 10.1002/jcp.27486
41
SchmittJ.BackesC.Nourkami-TutdibiN.LeidingerP.DeutscherS.BeierM.et al (2012). Treatment-independent miRNA signature in blood of Wilms tumor patients. BMC Genomics13, 379. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-379
42
SpreaficoF.FernandezC. V.BrokJ.NakataK.VujanicG.GellerJ. I.et al (2021). Wilms tumour. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.7, 75–21. 10.1038/s41572-021-00308-8
43
TastsoglouS.SkoufosG.MiliotisM.KaragkouniD.KoutsoukosI.KaravangeliA.et al (2023). DIANA-miRPath v4.0: expanding target-based miRNA functional analysis in cell-type and tissue contexts. Nucleic Acids Res.51, W154–W159. 10.1093/nar/gkad431
44
The RNAcentral Consortium (2019). RNAcentral: a hub of information for non-coding RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.47, D221–D229. 10.1093/nar/gky1034
45
TorrezanG. T.FerreiraE. N.NakahataA. M.BarrosB. D. F.CastroM. T. M.CorreaB. R.et al (2014). Recurrent somatic mutation in DROSHA induces microRNA profile changes in Wilms tumour. Nat. Commun.5, 4039. 10.1038/ncomms5039
46
TregerT. D.ChowdhuryT.Pritchard-JonesK.BehjatiS. (2019). The genetic changes of Wilms tumour. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.15, 240–251. 10.1038/s41581-019-0112-0
47
VardapourR.KehlT.KneitzS.LudwigN.MeeseE.LenhofH.-P.et al (2022). The DGCR8 E518K mutation found in Wilms tumors leads to a partial miRNA processing defect that alters gene expression patterns and biological processes. Carcinogenesis43, 82–93. 10.1093/carcin/bgab110
48
WalzA. L.OomsA.GaddS.GerhardD. S.SmithM. A.Guidry AuvilJ. M.et al (2015). Recurrent DGCR8, DROSHA, and SIX homeodomain mutations in favorable histology Wilms tumors. Cancer Cell27, 286–297. 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.01.003
49
WangC.ShuaiY.ZhaoC.YangF.SuW.NingZ.et al (2022). MicroRNA-10 family promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in renal fibrosis by the PTEN/akt pathway. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.44, 6059–6074. 10.3390/cimb44120413
50
WangJ.HuQ.LiuQ.WeiY. (2010). MicroRNA differential expression profile in nephroblastoma cell line versus normal embryonic kidney cell line. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi90, 1845–1848. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.26.014
51
WatsonJ. A.BryanK.WilliamsR.PopovS.VujanicG.CoulombA.et al (2013). miRNA profiles as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness in Wilms’ tumor blastema. PLoS One8, e53417. 10.1371/journal.pone.0053417
52
WegertJ.IshaqueN.VardapourR.GeörgC.GuZ.BiegM.et al (2015). Mutations in the SIX1/2 pathway and the DROSHA/DGCR8 miRNA microprocessor complex underlie high-risk blastemal type Wilms tumors. Cancer Cell27, 298–311. 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.01.002
53
WickhamH. (2016). “Data analysis,” in ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Editor WickhamH. (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 189–201. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
54
XianY.WangL.YaoB.YangW.MoH.ZhangL.et al (2019). MicroRNA-769-5p contributes to the proliferation, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by attenuating RYBP. Biomed. and Pharmacother.118, 109343. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109343
55
ZhangM.XueE.ShaoW. (2016). Andrographolide promotes vincristine-induced SK-NEP-1 tumor cell death via PI3K-AKT-p53 signaling pathway. Drug Des. Dev. Ther.10, 3143–3152. 10.2147/DDDT.S113838
56
ZhaoY.ZhangW.YangY.DaiE.BaiY. (2021). Diagnostic and prognostic value of microRNA-2355-3p and contribution to the progression in lung adenocarcinoma. Bioengineered12, 4747–4756. 10.1080/21655979.2021.1952367
57
ZhuX.-L.RenL.-F.WangH.-P.BaiZ.-T.ZhangL.MengW.-B.et al (2019). Plasma microRNAs as potential new biomarkers for early detection of early gastric cancer. World J. Gastroenterol.25, 1580–1591. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1580
Summary
Keywords
next-generation sequencing, miRNAome profiling, blood-based biomarkers, wilms tumor, histopathological subtyping
Citation
Mohamed FS, Jalal D, Fadel YM, El-Mashtoly SF, Khaled WZ, Sayed AA and Ghazy MA (2024) Profiling of the serum MiRNAome in pediatric egyptian patients with wilms tumor. Front. Mol. Biosci. 11:1453562. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1453562
Received
23 June 2024
Accepted
19 September 2024
Published
15 October 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited by
Renjun Gu, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, China
Reviewed by
Tamás Micsik, Semmelweis University, Hungary
Assunta Sellitto, Italian Institute of Technology, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Mohamed, Jalal, Fadel, El-Mashtoly, Khaled, Sayed and Ghazy.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ahmed A. Sayed, ahmad.sayed@57357.org
ORCID: Ahmed A. Sayed, orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-4709; Youssef M. Fadel, orcid.org/0009-0000-8252-0103; Deena Jalal, orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-5166; Mohamed Ghazy, orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-3583; Samir F. El-Mashtoly, orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-8817; Fatma Mohamed, orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-5324
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.