Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Mol. Biosci., 12 January 2026

Sec. RNA Networks and Biology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2025.1750832

This article is part of the Research TopicNon-coding RNAs in the tumoral microenvironment: mechanisms, regulatory networks and clinical applications in cancer immunityView all articles

Circular RNAs: roles in hepatocellular carcinoma immune regulation, implications in immunotherapy, and prospects for clinical translation

Yifan Chen,,&#x;Yifan Chen1,2,3Jiayi Zhao,,&#x;Jiayi Zhao1,2,3Rui Pu,,&#x;Rui Pu1,2,3Chao Fu,,Chao Fu1,2,3Zishuai Li,,Zishuai Li1,2,3Jianhua Yin,,Jianhua Yin1,2,3Guangwen Cao,,
Guangwen Cao1,2,3*
  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Navy Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Biological Defense, Ministry of Education, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Bioprotection, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are emerging as pivotal regulators within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the transformative role of immunotherapy, its efficacy remains limited by primary and acquired resistance, a challenge not fully addressed by current research. This review uniquely synthesizes the latest evidence to delineate how specific circRNAs orchestrate immunosuppression in HCC through two interconnected axes: (1) by directly modulating the function and polarization of key immune cells (e.g., T cells, NK cells, macrophages), and (2) by interfering with core immune-related signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB, MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin). We critically examine how these mechanisms collectively fuel immune evasion and confer resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moving beyond mechanism, we further explore the dual translational potential of circRNAs: as stable, minimally invasive diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers and as novel therapeutic targets via RNA interference or circRNA-based vaccine strategies. By connecting fundamental molecular insights to clinical challenges, this review provides a cohesive framework for understanding circRNA-driven immunomodulation in HCC and highlights promising avenues for overcoming immunotherapy resistance.

1 Introduction

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, imposing a substantial global health burden (Bray et al., 2024). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a malignant tumor originating from hepatocytes, accounts for 75%–85% of PLC cases globally and a higher proportion of 93% in mainland China (Lin et al., 2022; El-Serag, 2011). Clinically, HCC is asymptomatic during early disease stages, resulting in delayed diagnosis at advanced stages for most patients and a 5-year survival rate below 15% (Zeng et al., 2024; Heimbach et al., 2018). Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the predominant risk factor of HCC, contributing to 84.4% of cases in mainland China, other etiologies such as hepatitis C virus infection and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease also play important roles globally (Bray et al., 2024; Huang et al., 2021; Toh et al., 2023).

The emergence of immunotherapy has ushered in a transformative era in oncology treatment, complementing traditional methods like surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, providing optimism for HCC treatment (Yau et al., 2020; Finn et al., 2025). Immunotherapeutic agents represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) regulate the body’s inherent immune system to break the tumor’s immune escape mechanisms, enabling the immune system to re-recognize and attack tumor cells. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy exhibits favorable efficacy in a subset of HCC patients, significantly prolonging survival and improving quality of life (Cheng et al., 2022; Finn et al., 2020). However, most patients fail to achieve sustained clinical benefit with current systemic therapies. Single ICI monoclonal antibody achieves modest response rates (approximately 15%–20%) (El-Khoueiry et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2018). Moreover, recurrence is common even after curative-intent treatments, underscoring the limitations of current approaches and the urgent need for more effective systemic strategies (Yin et al., 2024).

Recent studies have spotlighted the pivotal role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in orchestrating resistance to cancer immunotherapy. CircRNA, a novel class of non-coding RNA, distinguished by its unique covalently closed circular structure, exhibits greater stability compared to linear RNA and is less susceptible to degradation by exonucleases (Chen, 2020). A growing body of evidence indicates that circRNA plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of HCC, participating in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis through diverse and complex molecular mechanisms (Kristensen et al., 2022). Concurrently, circRNA exerts crucial functions in immunomodulation by interacting with immune cells and molecules, thereby influencing the anti-tumor immune response (Ma et al., 2024). Accumulating evidence suggests that circRNAs may mediate immunotherapy resistance by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment or immune checkpoint signaling, making them promising targets to overcome treatment failure (Zhang et al., 2024). Therefore, thorough exploration of the mechanisms underlying circRNA role in HCC immunity offers the potential to identify novel targets and strategies for HCC immunotherapy, further enhancing treatment efficacy and improving patient prognosis. In this review, we focus on how circRNAs regulate the immune response in HCC via intricate molecular mechanisms and immune-related signaling pathways. We further discuss their potential roles in driving resistance to HCC immunotherapy and, finally, outline their clinical translation prospects as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

2 Biological characteristics and functions of circRNAs

CircRNAs are a special class of non-coding RNA, distinguished from linear RNAs by their unique closed-loop structure, which is not formed by chance but is produced by the back-splicing of linear precursor mRNA (Liu and Chen, 2022). During back-splicing, a downstream 5′splice donor site is reversely joined to an upstream 3′splice acceptor site, resulting in circRNAs lacking the 5′cap and 3′polyA tail typical of linear RNAs (Ashwal-Fluss et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2020a). This unique structure confers high stability to circRNAs, making them resistant to exonuclease degradation and allowing them to persist in cells for extended periods (Chen and Yang, 2015). The functions of circRNAs are diverse and complex, with their role as miRNA sponges being of significant interest. Taking circRNA CiRS-7 as an example, it contains more than 70 binding sites for miR-7. It is highly and extensively associated with Argonaute proteins in a miR-7-dependent manner. Although circRNA is completely resistant to miRNA-mediated target destabilization, it strongly suppresses miR-7 activity, leading to increased levels of miR-7 targets (Hansen et al., 2013). Furthermore, circRNAs are involved in the regulation of gene transcription (Liu and Chen, 2022). Some circRNAs can interact with host DNA to form R-loop structures, and the formation of these structures can interfere with normal DNA replication, transcription processes, and post-damage repair mechanisms (Katrekar et al., 2022). For instance, circRHOT1 recruits the Tat-interacting protein to the NR2F6 promoter, inducing the expression of proto-oncogenes and promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in HCC (Wang et al., 2019). Due to the absence of 5′cap structures and 3′poly(A) tails, circRNAs were generally regarded as non-coding RNAs with no capacity for protein coding. However, accumulating evidence from in-depth studies has revealed that a subset of circRNAs contains open reading frames and can be translated into proteins or peptides under specific conditions (Duan et al., 2022; Legnini et al., 2017; Pamudurti et al., 2017), which opening up new perspectives for our understanding of gene expression and regulatory mechanisms, and providing novel potential targets for disease diagnosis and treatment.

3 Microenvironment of HCC

The tumor microenvironment (TME) of HCC constitutes a complex and dynamic network orchestrated by diverse immune cells, soluble mediators, and stromal components, whose dysregulation directly dictates tumor progression and immune therapeutic responses (Xue et al., 2022; Li et al., 2021; Cadamuro et al., 2023). As the primary effector cells of adaptive immunity, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes are responsible for recognizing and eliminating HBV-infected hepatocytes and tumor cells by secreting perforin, granzyme, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ); however, their function is frequently impaired in HCC TME, characterized by exhaustion phenotypes (e.g., overexpression of PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3) induced by chronic viral antigen stimulation and immunosuppressive signals (Baudi et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2019; Arvanitakis et al., 2024). Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are abnormally enriched in HCC tissues, where they suppress CTL and natural killer (NK) cell activity through the secretion of interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), while promoting immune tolerance via direct cell-cell contact mediated by CTLA-4 (Sawant et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2006). NK cells, as core components of innate immunity, exert direct anti-tumor effects without antigen priming, but their cytotoxicity is compromised by tumor-derived factors such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), leading to reduced IFN-γ secretion and enhanced inhibitory receptor expression (Jing et al., 2024; Walker and Rotondo, 2004; Van Elssen et al., 2011). Tumor-associated macrophages, the most abundant immune cells in HCC TME, predominantly polarize toward the M2 phenotype under the induction of HBV-encoded proteins (e.g., HBx) and tumor-derived cytokines, thereby promoting angiogenesis, extracellular matrix remodeling, and immune escape by secreting IL-10, TGF-β, and vascular endothelial growth factor (Zhu et al., 2021). Additionally, myeloid-derived suppressor cells accumulate in HCC TME and inhibit immune cell function through multiple mechanisms, including reactive oxygen species production, arginine depletion, and nitric oxide (NO) release (Liu et al., 2025; Ohl and Tenbrock, 2018). Soluble mediators such as cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α), chemokines (CXCL12, CCL2), and immune checkpoints (PD-L1/PD-1, CTLA-4) further exacerbate the immunosuppressive state of HCC TME, forming a vicious cycle that facilitates tumor immune escape and progression (Gong et al., 2018). Collectively, the HCC TME exhibits a predominantly immunosuppressive phenotype, and targeting key components of this microenvironment has become a promising strategy for improving immunotherapeutic efficacy (Wang et al., 2021a; Qin et al., 2020).

4 The pivotal role of circRNAs in immune regulation of HCC

4.1 The impact of circRNA on immune cell function

CircRNAs have emerged as pivotal regulators in the tumor immune microenvironment of HCC. They modulate the function of various immune cells, thereby critically influencing tumor progression and the efficacy of immunotherapy. The following discussion details their roles in key immune cell populations within the HCC microenvironment.

In the immune microenvironment of HCC, T cells serve as key immune effector cells, and their functional status directly influences the immune surveillance and cytotoxic capacity of the organism against tumor cells. Studies have shown that exosomal circGSE1 derived from HCC acts as a molecular sponge for miR-324-5p, activating the TGFBR1/Smad3 axis to promote the expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs), thereby exacerbating immunosuppression and driving tumor progression (Huang et al., 2022). Another study revealed that exosomal circCCAR1 secreted by HCC cells can be taken up by CD8+ T cells, where it stabilizes PD-1 protein, leading to CD8+ T cell exhaustion and conferring resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (Hu et al., 2023).

Macrophage polarization is regulated by multiple circRNAs. circ0003410, which is highly expressed in HCC, upregulates CCL5 by sponging miR-139-3p, thereby recruiting and polarizing macrophages toward the M2 phenotype, which accelerates HCC malignancy (Cao et al., 2022). In contrast, hsa_circ_0074854 can suppress exosome-mediated M2 polarization of macrophages by reducing the stability of human antigen R (HuR) protein, thereby inhibiting HCC migration and invasion (Wang et al., 2021c). Additionally, hsa_circ_0110,102 sponges miR-580-5p to downregulate PPARα and inhibit CCL2 secretion, subsequently suppressing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from macrophages via the COX-2/PGE2 pathway, exerting a tumor-suppressive effect (Wang et al., 2021b).

In the TME, NK cells are crucial for tumor immune surveillance, and NK cell dysfunction is strongly associated with the development of malignant tumors (Shimasaki et al., 2020). The regulation of NK cell function by circRNAs is a key focus in HCC immunity. Exosomal circUHRF1 derived from HCC degrades miR-449c-5p to upregulate TIM-3 expression, inhibiting the secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α by NK cells, thereby impairing their antitumor function and contributing to anti-PD-1 therapy resistance (Zhang et al., 2020b). Another circRNA, hsa_circ_0007456, binds to miR-6852-3p to regulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression, increasing NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against HCC cells and inhibiting tumor development (Shi et al., 2021).

In summary, these findings collectively underscore the critical role of circRNAs as master regulators of the immunosuppressive TME in HCC (Table 1). By exploiting exosome-mediated mechanisms, specific circRNAs orchestrate immune evasion through distinct pathways: they drive Treg expansion and impair CD8+ T cell function, promote the polarization of pro-tumoral M2 macrophages, and suppress the cytotoxic activity of NK cells (Figure 1). This intricate network not only facilitates HCC progression and metastasis but also contributes to resistance against current immunotherapies. Consequently, targeting these oncogenic circRNAs or their downstream pathways presents a promising strategic avenue for overcoming immunotherapy resistance and improving patient outcomes. However, there are still some limitations in existing research. Firstly, most findings are derived from cell experiments and mouse models, and their precise functions in the human tumor microenvironment require further validation through larger-scale clinical samples. Secondly, current studies often focus on the regulation of specific immune cell types by individual circRNAs, lacking a networked analysis of circRNA-mediated synergistic interactions across different immune cell subsets. For instance, it remains unknown whether the same circRNA could simultaneously regulate the functions of T cells and macrophages, potentially resulting in additive or counteractive immune effects. Additionally, discrepancies exist among different studies regarding the specific mechanisms and targets of particular circRNAs, such as hsa_circ_0074854, which may be attributed to tumor heterogeneity, variations in research models, or detection methods. Future research should employ techniques like single-cell sequencing to systematically map the circRNA-regulated immune cell interaction network in more complex in vivo environments and explore their potential as combinatorial therapeutic targets.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of circRNA Functions in HCC Immune Regulation.

Figure 1
Diagram showing interactions between HCC cells, exosomes, and immune cells. Exosomes from HCC cells release circRNAs like circCCAR1 and circGSE1, which influence T cell and macrophage functions. HCC cells also release circ0003410 and circ0007456, affecting ICAM-1 and CCL5 proteins, modulating macrophage recruitment and polarization. CircUHRF1 impacts NK cells by increasing cytotoxicity. Arrows indicate molecular interactions and cell signaling pathways, including effects on miRNA and protein expression.

Figure 1. circRNA Functions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immune Regulation (Designed with BioRender.com) HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; Tregs, regulatory T cells; CD8+ T cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; CCL5, C-C motif chemokine ligand 5; NK Cells, natural killer cells; M2, macrophage 2.

4.2 The impact of circRNA on classical immune-related signaling pathways

Beyond their roles in modulating immune cell function, circRNAs also exert profound influence on the progression and therapeutic response of HCC by directly targeting classical immune-related signaling pathways. Key pathways such as NF-κB, MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin are frequently dysregulated in HCC and have been identified as critical downstream mechanisms through which circRNAs promote or suppress tumorigenesis.

NF-κB is a family of transcription factors that transactivate genes involved in various biological processes, including immune response, inflammation, cell growth, and survival (Mao et al., 2025). In HCC, low expression of circPTPN12 is associated with poor prognosis and promotes tumor progression by activating the NF-κB pathway, which in turn enhances the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, fostering an immune-resistant microenvironment (Ji et al., 2024).

The MAPK signaling pathway is another crucial immune-related pathway, playing a key role in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and immune responses. circDHPR acts as a ceRNA for miR-3194-5p, leading to upregulation of RASGEF1B and subsequent inhibition of the Ras/MAPK cascade, thereby suppressing tumor growth (Guo et al., 2023). In contrast, circASAP1 promotes metastasis by sponging miR-326 and miR-532-5p, which relieves their repression on MAPK1 and enhances MAPK signaling (Hu et al., 2020). Furthermore, circCCNY can bind to HSP60 and promote its ubiquitin-mediated degradation, resulting in inhibition of the MAPK pathway and restoration of lenvatinib sensitivity (Yang et al., 2025).

Dysregulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway is an early event in hepatocarcinogenesis and is associated with an aggressive HCC phenotype due to its roles in cell survival, proliferation, migration, and immune evasion (Pez et al., 2013; Schwertheim et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2018). circβ-catenin encodes a novel β-catenin isoform that stabilizes full-length β-catenin and potently activates Wnt signaling, driving immune evasion and tumor progression (Liang et al., 2019). Similarly, circFADS1 facilitates GSK3β ubiquitination and degradation, leading to Wnt/β-catenin activation (Tang et al., 2025). On the other hand, circPIK3C3 functions as a tumor suppressor by sponging miR-452-5p to upregulate SOX15, which inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling and reverses lenvatinib resistance (Yuan et al., 2025).

In conclusion, it is evident that circRNAs function as pivotal upstream regulators of several cornerstone immune signaling pathways in HCC, including NF-κB, MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin, and others (Table 2). They employ diverse mechanisms, such as acting as ceRNAs, encoding novel peptides, or facilitating protein ubiquitination, to finely tune the activity of these pathways. This intricate regulation directly impacts tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance (Figure 2). The accumulating evidence highlights the potential of targeting specific oncogenic circRNAs or leveraging tumor-suppressive circRNAs as a promising strategy for disrupting these vital signaling networks in HCC treatment. While existing research has successfully established a theoretical framework in which circRNAs influence the progression and therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by regulating core signaling pathways such as NF-κB, MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin—and has revealed diverse mechanisms including functioning as ceRNAs, encoding peptides, or modulating protein stability—the field still faces several profound challenges and limitations. A substantial body of evidence remains reliant on cell lines and mouse models, which inadequately reflect the highly heterogeneous tumor microenvironment in humans. Many mechanistic studies lack rigor, such as insufficient validation of the competitive binding conditions required for ceRNA functionality. Moreover, contradictions frequently arise across different studies regarding the function or even the directional role of the same circRNA, highlighting the context-dependent nature of its actions and the complexity introduced by tumor heterogeneity. More critically, current research predominantly focuses on linear regulatory models of individual molecules, lacking a systemic understanding of how circRNAs may collaboratively form regulatory networks to integratively shape the tumor signaling landscape and immune microenvironment. Future studies urgently need to employ single-cell multi-omics, spatial transcriptomics, and more physiologically relevant models to validate circRNA functional networks within authentic biological contexts. Furthermore, the clinical translation pathway—encompassing specific delivery, off-target effects, and feasibility of combination with existing therapies—must be rigorously evaluated for their potential as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Only through such efforts can this promising research direction be translated into tangible clinical benefits.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Summary of circRNAs Regulating Key Signaling Pathways in HCC.

Figure 2
Diagram showing signaling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. It illustrates the interactions between circRNAs like circPTPN12, circDHPR, circASAP1, and miRNAs such as miR-3194-5p, miR-326/miR-532-5p, and miR-452-5p. Key proteins involved include NF-κB, p65, β-catenin, and MAPK. The pathways depict how these molecules influence each other and contribute to cellular processes, with arrows indicating the direction of action and interactions across the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments.

Figure 2. circRNAs Regulating Key Signaling Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Designed with BioRender.com). HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-B.

5 The potential of circRNA as biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC

5.1 Research progress of circRNA as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker

Due to the absence of distinct early symptoms and reliable, effective biomarkers, HCC patients are frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to a suboptimal overall survival rate (El-Serag and Rudolph, 2007). Currently employed diagnostic biomarkers, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and DCP, possess limited diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (Pan et al., 2020; Yasuda et al., 2019). circRNAs, defined by their unique closed circular structure, demonstrate high stability and detectability in biological specimens including tissues, peripheral blood, and urine. They are also closely implicated in multiple biological processes of HCC, rendering them potential novel biomarkers for the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of HCC. By virtue of their pivotal roles in the initiation and progression of HCC as well as their inherent stability, circRNAs exhibit substantial potential as biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC. Continuous advancements in detection technologies will empower circRNAs to exert a more prominent role in the early diagnosis of HCC, thereby enhancing the therapeutic outcomes and prognosis of patients.

circ-CDYL is specifically upregulated in both early-stage (BCLC 0-A) HCC tissues and corresponding sera. A three-factor logistic model integrating circ-CDYL and its target genes HDGF and HIF1AN discriminates early HCC from adjacent non-tumor tissue with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.80), a sensitivity of 75.4% and a specificity of 66.7%, significantly outperforming the conventional biomarker AFP (AUC 0.59). Expression levels of the three analytes are independently associated with tumor size, vascular invasion and other clinicopathological features, indicating their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of HCC (Wei et al., 2020). Zhang et al. demonstrated that circRNA_104,075 is highly expressed in both HCC tissues and serum samples. Additionally, it exhibits superior predictive performance for HCC compared to AFP, which suggests that circRNA_104,075 may serve as a more effective serum and tissue biomarker for HCC diagnosis than AFP (Zhang et al., 2018). circSMEK1 is significantly downregulated in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and HCC, and its serum level can serve as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker (AUC = 0.79). Its expression is negatively regulated by the splicing factor SF3B4. Restoring circSMEK1 expression or combining it with an IGF2 inhibitor shows promising therapeutic potential (Guo et al., 2025). In another study, through circRNA microarray screening and qRT-PCR validation, three circRNAs (hsa_circ_0000976, hsa_circ_0007750, and hsa_circ_0139,897) significantly upregulated in the plasma of HCC patients were identified, and a diagnostic model named CircPanel was constructed. This model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in both the training set and two independent validation sets. Its accuracy in distinguishing HCC patients from healthy controls, chronic hepatitis B patients, and cirrhosis patients (AUC values of 0.863, 0.843, and 0.864, respectively) was significantly higher than that of the traditional tumor marker AFP. Furthermore, CircPanel also exhibited remarkable diagnostic ability for small HCC (diameter ≤3 cm), AFP-negative HCC, and AFP-negative small HCC. These circRNAs showed good stability in plasma, and their levels decreased significantly after surgery, suggesting their origin from tumor tissue. Therefore, CircPanel is expected to become a novel, non-invasive, and highly accurate diagnostic tool for HCC, particularly suitable for early detection and AFP-negative patient populations (Yu et al., 2020). Similarly, another study, using microarray screening and multiple validation steps, identified three circRNAs (circ_0009582, circ_0037120, and circ_0140,117) that were significantly elevated in the plasma of patients with HBV-HCC. The constructed circRNA panel demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in both training and validation sets, with AUC values of 0.800 and 0.857 for distinguishing HCC from chronic hepatitis or healthy controls, respectively. These values further improved to 0.988 and 0.955 when combined with AFP. Additionally, the levels of these three circRNAs decreased in postoperative plasma, and they were highly expressed in tumor tissues and positively correlated with plasma levels, indicating their tumor origin. The study suggests that this circRNA panel could serve as a potential predictive biomarker for HCC development in HBV-infected individuals, especially for early diagnosis and AFP-negative patients (Wu et al., 2020).

circRNAs are increasingly recognized as potential prognostic biomarkers. For instance, CircSETD3 (has_circRNA_0000567/hsa_circRNA_101,436) is significantly downregulated in HCC tissues and cell lines. Low expression of circSETD3 in HCC tissue significantly predicts poor prognosis and is associated with larger tumor size and poor differentiation in patients (Xu et al., 2019). In contrast, another study found that the level of circNFATC3 was positively correlated with NFATC3 mRNA, and high NFATC3 expression predicted a better prognosis; thus, circNFATC3 may be a biomarker for favorable prognosis in HCC patients (Jia et al., 2021). Furthermore, our team discovered that circKCNN2 is transcriptionally repressed by NFYA and inhibits HCC recurrence via the miR-520c-3p/MBD2 axis. The intrinsic level of circKCNN2 in HCC cells confers anti-tumor effects to lenvatinib. circKCNN2 may be a promising predictive biomarker for HCC recurrence and a potential therapeutic agent (Liu et al., 2022).

As summarized in Table 3, multiple circRNAs and circRNA panels have shown promising diagnostic and prognostic performance for HCC. Although these circRNA panels demonstrate potential that surpasses the traditional marker AFP, their clinical translation still faces significant challenges. Existing studies generally have limited sample sizes and are mostly single-center, lacking validation through prospective, multi-center, large-scale cohorts, which affects the reproducibility and general applicability of the results. The diagnostic circRNA profiles reported across different studies show low overlap, likely due to heterogeneity in patient populations (e.g., differing etiologies and stages), variations in sample processing protocols, and the lack of standardized detection technologies for circRNAs (such as primer design and normalization methods). Furthermore, most studies have not adequately assessed the specificity of these circRNA markers in distinguishing HCC from other benign liver diseases, such as hemangiomas or focal nodular hyperplasia. Moving forward, establishing standardized protocols for circRNA detection and data analysis, as well as validating them in prospective cohorts that include diverse liver disease controls, are essential steps toward advancing their clinical application.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Summary of circular RNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.

5.2 Exploration of circRNA-Based therapeutic strategies

Therapeutic strategies targeting circRNA are a research hotspot in the field of HCC treatment, currently focusing on RNA interference and circRNA vaccines, among others. RNA interference (RNAi) technology is an effective method for gene silencing, involving three RNA molecules (siRNA, shRNA, and antisense oligonucleotides) (Løvendorf et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024), which can be used to target and silence circRNAs associated with the development and progression of HCC. By developing a novel siRNA delivery system based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, targeted silencing of circ_0058051 was effectively achieved. Experimental results demonstrated that this magnetic nanoplatform significantly inhibited HCC cell proliferation and tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo, with no apparent toxicity, exhibiting excellent targeting ability and safety. This provides a new strategy and promising clinical application prospect for gene therapy of HCC (You et al., 2023). However, RNAi molecules have limitations such as instability, low targeting efficiency, difficulties in transfection, and immunogenicity.

Due to their excellent stability and protein-coding capacity, circRNAs are considered an emerging immunotherapy strategy and show great promise in immunotherapy. circRNA vaccines, characterized by their low immunogenicity/cytotoxicity, can enhance the immune response to tumor antigens in terms of strength, breadth, quality, and duration (Niu et al., 2023; Bowen et al., 2018). Compared to traditional linear mRNA vaccines, circRNA vaccines exhibit higher stability, can persist in the body for extended periods, and continuously express antigens, thereby inducing a more durable and potent immune response. Currently, although research on circRNA vaccines in HCC is still in its early stages, some encouraging results have been achieved. Wang et al. designed and developed a circRNA vaccine platform capable of encoding the Ptpn2_I383T peptide as an HCC-specific neoantigen (Wang et al., 2024). This platform significantly activated dendritic cell maturation in vitro and induced T-cell activation. It demonstrated notable efficacy in both therapeutic and preventive settings in HCC mouse models. Another advantage of circRNAs in the vaccine field is their ability to activate various immune cells and influence different immune pathways. As a result, circRNAs can function as self-adjuvants for autonomous immune regulation, enhancing anti-tumor immunity, modulating the TME, improving vaccination efficiency, and reducing adverse effects associated with other immune adjuvants (Li et al., 2023). Another research developed a novel HCC neoantigen vaccine based on circRNA. Using the PIE strategy, they synthesized in vitro circRNA encoding tumor-specific neoantigens (e.g., the PTPN2 mutant peptide) and delivered it efficiently via lipid nanoparticles. In subcutaneous, orthotopic, and prophylactic mouse HCC models, the vaccine elicited robust tumor suppression, achieving complete regression in 60%–80% of tumors, increased infiltration of tumor-specific T cells and central memory T cells, prolonged survival, and showed no apparent toxicity. This work provides the first proof-of-concept that a circRNA neoantigen vaccine expressing endogenous tumor mutations is feasible for cancer therapy (Wang et al., 2024). Several research teams are exploring the combination of circRNA vaccines with immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. This combination strategy holds promise for disrupting the immune evasion mechanisms of tumors, improving the survival rate and quality of life for HCC patients, and bringing new breakthroughs in the treatment of HCC.

Although circRNA vaccines and RNAi therapies hold great promise, both are currently at the preclinical research stage and remain distant from clinical application. Key challenges lie in their in vivo delivery efficiency, targeting specificity, and long-term safety. For instance, achieving specific liver-targeted delivery of circRNA drugs or vaccines while avoiding off-target effects and potential immunogenicity represents a pressing technical bottleneck. Existing studies on circRNA vaccines are largely based on individual neoantigen models, and whether their efficacy applies to highly heterogeneous HCC populations still requires validation. Furthermore, combining circRNA-targeted therapies—such as silencing oncogenic circRNAs—with immunostimulatory strategies like circRNA vaccines, or integrating them with existing immune checkpoint inhibitors, may yield synergistic effects. However, the related combination strategies and their optimal sequencing regimens remain to be systematically explored. Future research should focus on developing efficient and safe delivery systems and evaluating the potential and mechanisms of combination therapies in models that more closely mimic human disease, such as humanized mouse models.

6 Challenges and prospects

Although circRNA research has provided new insights into understanding immune regulation in HCC and demonstrates potential diagnostic and therapeutic value, its translation from mechanistic exploration to clinical application faces multiple challenges. Current studies predominantly focus on descriptive phenotyping and preliminary mechanism validation, leaving significant limitations in methodological reliability, mechanistic depth, clinical applicability, and safety.

6.1 Technical challenges in detection and quantification

Current circRNA detection primarily relies on techniques such as qRT-PCR, RNA sequencing, and microarrays. However, these methods still face shortcomings in sensitivity, specificity, and quantitative accuracy. Detecting low-abundance circRNAs remains a challenge, and conventional methods struggle to accurately distinguish between highly homologous circRNA isoforms due to their overlapping sequences. Furthermore, the lack of standardized protocols for circRNA enrichment and library construction leads to poor comparability of data across different laboratories. This partially explains the low overlap observed in circRNA marker profiles from various studies. Future efforts necessitate the development of next-generation technologies, including long-read sequencing, digital detection, and single-molecule imaging, combined with optimized bioinformatics pipelines for circRNA annotation and quantification to enhance data reliability and reproducibility (Mi et al., 2022; Vromman et al., 2023).

6.2 Heterogeneity of HCC driven by different etiologies

HCC pathogenesis is highly heterogeneous, with major etiologies including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The immune microenvironment, gene expression profiles, and clinical progression of HCC differ significantly across these etiologic backgrounds. Yet, most current circRNA studies do not systematically stratify patients by etiology, meaning their conclusions may only apply to specific subpopulations. Future research needs to be conducted in cohorts defined by different etiologic drivers to uncover etiology-specific patterns of circRNA expression and function, thereby promoting the development of personalized diagnosis and treatment strategies.

6.3 Delivery hurdles and safety concerns for circRNA-Based therapeutic strategies

circRNA-based intervention strategies (e.g., RNA interference, circRNA vaccines) have shown promise in preclinical research, but their in vivo delivery efficiency, targeting specificity, and stability remain major bottlenecks. circRNA molecules are relatively large, negatively charged, difficult to cross cell membranes, and susceptible to degradation by serum nucleases. Existing delivery systems (e.g., lipid nanoparticles, exosomes) require further optimization regarding liver targeting, loading efficiency, and in vivo distribution. Additionally, while circRNA vaccines offer advantages like high stability and prolonged expression, their potential immunogenicity cannot be ignored. Exogenous circRNA might be recognized by intracellular pattern recognition receptors, triggering non-specific innate immune responses that could compromise vaccine safety and efficacy. Future work must focus on optimizing the chemical modifications and delivery vehicles for circRNAs, alongside systematically evaluating their immune-activating properties and long-term toxicity in preclinical models.

6.4 Lack of network-based and dynamic perspectives in mechanistic studies

Existing research predominantly focuses on linear pathways where a single circRNA regulates downstream target genes via ceRNA mechanisms, lacking an integrated analysis of circRNA’s dynamic roles within multicellular, multi-pathway interaction networks. A single circRNA may simultaneously influence tumor cells, immune cells, and stromal cells within the same microenvironment, with its function being spatiotemporally specific and context-dependent. Moreover, research on the immunomodulatory functions of circRNA-encoded peptides is still in its infancy, and the synergistic or antagonistic relationships between this coding function and the classical non-coding roles urgently need clarification. Integrating single-cell multi-omics, spatial transcriptomics, and live-cell imaging technologies to dynamically capture circRNA functional networks in in vivo models will be a key focus for future mechanistic investigations.

6.5 Insufficient standardization and evidence strength for clinical translation

The clinical translation of circRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets urgently requires standardized operational procedures and validation in large-scale, prospective cohorts. Most current diagnostic studies suffer from limited sample sizes, retrospective designs, and a lack of independent validation cohorts, undermining the credibility for clinical adoption. On the therapeutic front, circRNA-based interventions remain in the preclinical stage, with their pharmacokinetics, optimal dosing regimens, and long-term safety assessment frameworks yet to be established. Promoting multicenter collaborations, establishing standardized circRNA detection and reporting guidelines, and initiating prospective clinical studies are essential steps to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical application.

6.6 Future perspectives

Future circRNA research should be dedicated to constructing a translational pathway integrating “mechanism, technology, and clinic” into a cohesive framework. Mechanistically, it should leverage multi-omics and artificial intelligence approaches to unveil the dynamic regulatory networks of circRNAs within the HCC immune microenvironment. Technologically, it necessitates innovation in detection and delivery tools to enhance research precision and intervention specificity. Clinically, it should promote individualized studies guided by etiology and prognosis stratification, driving circRNA biomarkers and therapies into clinical trials. Ultimately, through multidisciplinary collaboration and industry-academia integration, circRNAs hold promise to become the next breakthrough frontier in HCC immunotherapy.

Author contributions

YC: Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft. JZ: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. RP: Writing – original draft. CF: Writing – original draft. ZL: Writing – original draft. JY: Writing – original draft. GC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was funded by the National 2030 Key Research Program of China [grant number 2023ZD0500100], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82473715, 82204112], and the 3–years public health program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [grant number GWVI–11.1–10].

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The authors GC and JY declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Arvanitakis, K., Papadakos, S. P., Vakadaris, G., Chatzikalil, E., Stergiou, I. E., Kalopitas, G., et al. (2024). Shedding light on the role of LAG-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: unraveling immunomodulatory pathways. Hepatoma Res. 10, 20. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2024.36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ashwal-Fluss, R., Meyer, M., Pamudurti, N. R., Ivanov, A., Bartok, O., Hanan, M., et al. (2014). circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 56, 55–66. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baudi, I., Kawashima, K., and Isogawa, M. (2021). HBV-specific CD8+ T-Cell tolerance in the liver. Front. Immunol. 12, 721975. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.721975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bowen, W. S., Svrivastava, A. K., Batra, L., Barsoumian, H., and Shirwan, H. (2018). Current challenges for cancer vaccine adjuvant development. Expert Rev. Vaccines 17, 207–215. doi:10.1080/14760584.2018.1434000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., et al. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 229–263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cadamuro, M., Nuozzi, G., Simioni, P., and Fabris, L. (2023). The tumor microenvironment in hepatocarcinoma: dissecting the functions of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Hepatoma Res. 9, 47. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2023.94

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, P., Ma, B., Sun, D., Zhang, W., Qiu, J., Qin, L., et al. (2022). hsa_circ_0003410 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by increasing the ratio of M2/M1 macrophages through the miR-139-3p/CCL5 axis. Cancer Sci. 113, 634–647. doi:10.1111/cas.15238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L. L. (2020). The expanding regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions of circular RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 475–490. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0243-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L. L., and Yang, L. (2015). Regulation of circRNA biogenesis. RNA Biol. 12, 381–388. doi:10.1080/15476286.2015.1020271

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, A. L., Qin, S., Ikeda, M., Galle, P. R., Ducreux, M., Kim, T. Y., et al. (2022). Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 76, 862–873. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, J. L., Chen, W., Xie, J. J., Zhang, M. L., Nie, R. C., Liang, H., et al. (2022). A novel peptide encoded by N6-methyladenosine modified circMAP3K4 prevents apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 21, 93. doi:10.1186/s12943-022-01537-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EL-Khoueiry, A. B., Sangro, B., Yau, T., Crocenzi, T. S., Kudo, M., Hsu, C., et al. (2017). Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet 389, 2492–2502. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EL-Serag, H. B. (2011). Hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1118–1127. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1001683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EL-Serag, H. B., and Rudolph, K. L. (2007). Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 132, 2557–2576. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finn, R. S., Qin, S., Ikeda, M., Galle, P. R., Ducreux, M., Kim, T. Y., et al. (2020). Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1894–1905. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finn, R. S., Ryoo, B. Y., Hsu, C. H., Li, D., Burgoyne, A. M., Cotter, C., et al. (2025). Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b-2, study. Lancet Oncol. 26, 214–226. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00679-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gong, J., Chehrazi-Raffle, A., Reddi, S., and Salgia, R. (2018). Development of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as a form of cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review of registration trials and future considerations. J. Immunother. Cancer 6, 8. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0316-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, Z., Xie, Q., Wu, Y., Mo, H., Zhang, J., He, G., et al. (2023). Aberrant expression of circular RNA DHPR facilitates tumor growth and metastasis by regulating the RASGEF1B/RAS/MAPK axis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Oncol. (Dordr) 46, 1333–1350. doi:10.1007/s13402-023-00814-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, P., Jia, X., Wang, S., Li, X., Liu, Y., Lin, L., et al. (2025). CircSMEK1 suppresses HCC via the hnRNPK-IGF2-AKT axis: a diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 12, e05267. doi:10.1002/advs.202505267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hansen, T. B., Jensen, T. I., Clausen, B. H., Bramsen, J. B., Finsen, B., Damgaard, C. K., et al. (2013). Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature 495, 384–388. doi:10.1038/nature11993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heimbach, J. K., Kulik, L. M., Finn, R. S., Sirlin, C. B., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., et al. (2018). AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67, 358–380. doi:10.1002/hep.29086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Z. Q., Zhou, S. L., Li, J., Zhou, Z. J., Wang, P. C., Xin, H. Y., et al. (2020). Circular RNA sequencing identifies CircASAP1 as a key regulator in hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Hepatology 72, 906–922. doi:10.1002/hep.31068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Z., Chen, G., Zhao, Y., Gao, H., Li, L., Yin, Y., et al. (2023). Exosome-derived circCCAR1 promotes CD8 + T-cell dysfunction and anti-PD1 resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 22, 55. doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01759-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, D. Q., EL-Serag, H. B., and Loomba, R. (2021). Global epidemiology of NAFLD-related HCC: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 223–238. doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00381-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, M., Huang, X., and Huang, N. (2022). Exosomal circGSE1 promotes immune escape of hepatocellular carcinoma by inducing the expansion of regulatory T cells. Cancer Sci. 113, 1968–1983. doi:10.1111/cas.15365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, Y., Ni, C., Shen, Y., Xu, Z., Tang, L., Yu, F., et al. (2024). ESRP1-mediated biogenesis of circPTPN12 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression by PDLIM2/NF-κB pathway. Mol. Cancer 23, 143. doi:10.1186/s12943-024-02056-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, C., Yao, Z., Lin, Z., Zhao, L., Cai, X., Chen, S., et al. (2021). circNFATC3 sponges miR-548I acts as a ceRNA to protect NFATC3 itself and suppressed hepatocellular carcinoma progression. J. Cell Physiol. 236, 1252–1269. doi:10.1002/jcp.29931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jing, R., Bai, S., Zhang, P., Ren, H., Jia, L., Li, W., et al. (2024). IDO-1 impairs antitumor immunity of natural killer cells in triple-negative breast cancer via up-regulation of HLA-G. Breast Cancer 31, 135–147. doi:10.1007/s12282-023-01522-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katrekar, D., Yen, J., Xiang, Y., Saha, A., Meluzzi, D., Savva, Y., et al. (2022). Efficient in vitro and in vivo RNA editing via recruitment of endogenous ADARs using circular guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 938–945. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01171-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristensen, L. S., Jakobsen, T., Hager, H., and Kjems, J. (2022). The emerging roles of circRNAs in cancer and oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 188–206. doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00585-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Legnini, I., DI Timoteo, G., Rossi, F., Morlando, M., Briganti, F., Sthandier, O., et al. (2017). Circ-ZNF609 is a circular RNA that can be translated and functions in myogenesis. Mol. Cell 66, 22–37.e9. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Ramadori, P., Pfister, D., Seehawer, M., Zender, L., and Heikenwalder, M. (2021). The immunological and metabolic landscape in primary and metastatic liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 541–557. doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00383-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Wang, Y., Wu, P., Zhang, S., Gong, Z., Liao, Q., et al. (2023). Application prospect of circular RNA-based neoantigen vaccine in tumor immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 563, 216190. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216190

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, W. C., Wong, C. W., Liang, P. P., Shi, M., Cao, Y., Rao, S. T., et al. (2019). Translation of the circular RNA circβ-catenin promotes liver cancer cell growth through activation of the Wnt pathway. Genome Biol. 20, 84. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1685-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, J., Zhang, H., Yu, H., Bi, X., Zhang, W., Yin, J., et al. (2022). Epidemiological characteristics of primary liver cancer in mainland China from 2003 to 2020: a representative multicenter Study. Front. Oncol. 12, 906778. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.906778

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C. X., and Chen, L. L. (2022). Circular RNAs: characterization, cellular roles, and applications. Cell 185, 2016–2034. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, D., Liu, W., Chen, X., Yin, J., Ma, L., Liu, M., et al. (2022). circKCNN2 suppresses the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma at least partially via regulating miR-520c-3p/methyl-DNA-binding domain protein 2 axis. Clin. Transl. Med. 12, e662. doi:10.1002/ctm2.662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Zhang, T., Zou, X., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., Zang, J., et al. (2024). Penumbra-targeted CircOGDH siRNA-loaded nanoparticles alleviate neuronal apoptosis in focal brain ischaemia. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 9, 134–144. doi:10.1136/svn-2022-002009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Kang, X., Kang, H., and Yan, H. (2025). The immunosuppressive role of MDSCs in HCC: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Commun. Signal 23, 155. doi:10.1186/s12964-025-02170-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LøVENDORF, M. B., Holm, A., Petri, A., Thrue, C. A., Uchida, S., Venø, M. T., et al. (2023). Knockdown of circular RNAs using LNA-Modified antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid. Ther. 33, 45–57. doi:10.1089/nat.2022.0040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Wang, P., and Long, F. (2024). The role of circular RNAs in regulating resistance to cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms and implications. Cell Death Dis. 15, 312. doi:10.1038/s41419-024-06698-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mao, H., Zhao, X., and Sun, S. C. (2025). NF-κB in inflammation and cancer. Cell Mol. Immunol. 22, 811–839. doi:10.1038/s41423-025-01310-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mi, Z., Zhongqiang, C., Caiyun, J., Yanan, L., Jianhua, W., and Liang, L. (2022). Circular RNA detection methods: a minireview. Talanta 238, 123066. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Niu, D., Wu, Y., and Lian, J. (2023). Circular RNA vaccine in disease prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 341. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01561-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohl, K., and Tenbrock, K. (2018). Reactive oxygen species as regulators of MDSC-Mediated immune suppression. Front. Immunol. 9, 2499. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pamudurti, N. R., Bartok, O., Jens, M., Ashwal-Fluss, R., Stottmeister, C., Ruhe, L., et al. (2017). Translation of CircRNAs. Mol. Cell 66, 9–21.e7. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Chen, H., and Yu, J. (2020). Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives. Biomedicines 8, 576. doi:10.3390/biomedicines8120576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pez, F., Lopez, A., Kim, M., Wands, J. R., Caron DE Fromentel, C., and Merle, P. (2013). Wnt signaling and hepatocarcinogenesis: molecular targets for the development of innovative anticancer drugs. J. Hepatol. 59, 1107–1117. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, W., Cao, Z.-Y., Liu, S.-Y., and Xu, X.-D. (2020). Recent advances regarding tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 6, 24. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2020.04

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sawant, D. V., Yano, H., Chikina, M., Zhang, Q., Liao, M., Liu, C., et al. (2019). Adaptive plasticity of IL-10(+) and IL-35(+) T(reg) cells cooperatively promotes tumor T cell exhaustion. Nat. Immunol. 20, 724–735. doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0346-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwertheim, S., Jastrow, H., KäLSCH, J., Herold, T., Theurer, S., Ting, S., et al. (2020). β-catenin in intranuclear inclusions of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 6, 41. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2020.23

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, M., Li, Z. Y., Zhang, L. M., Wu, X. Y., Xiang, S. H., Wang, Y. G., et al. (2021). Hsa_circ_0007456 regulates the natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity toward hepatocellular carcinoma via the miR-6852-3p/ICAM-1 axis. Cell Death Dis. 12, 94. doi:10.1038/s41419-020-03334-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimasaki, N., Jain, A., and Campana, D. (2020). NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 200–218. doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0052-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tang, L., Ji, Y., Ni, C., Xu, Z., Shen, Y., Lu, H., et al. (2025). EIF4A3-Mediated biogenesis of CircFADS1 promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via Wnt/β-Catenin pathway. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 12, e2411869. doi:10.1002/advs.202411869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toh, M. R., Wong, E. Y. T., Wong, S. H., Ng, A. W. T., Loo, L. H., Chow, P. K., et al. (2023). Global epidemiology and genetics of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 164, 766–782. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

VAN Elssen, C. H., Vanderlocht, J., Oth, T., Senden-Gijsbers, B. L., Germeraad, W. T., and Bos, G. M. (2011). Inflammation-restraining effects of prostaglandin E2 on natural killer-dendritic cell (NK-DC) interaction are imprinted during DC maturation. Blood 118, 2473–2482. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-307835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vromman, M., Anckaert, J., Bortoluzzi, S., Buratin, A., Chen, C. Y., Chu, Q., et al. (2023). Large-scale benchmarking of circRNA detection tools reveals large differences in sensitivity but not in precision. Nat. Methods 20, 1159–1169. doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01944-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walker, W., and Rotondo, D. (2004). Prostaglandin E2 is a potent regulator of interleukin-12- and interleukin-18-induced natural killer cell interferon-gamma synthesis. Immunology 111, 298–305. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01810.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Long, H., Zheng, Q., Bo, X., Xiao, X., and Li, B. (2019). Circular RNA circRHOT1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by initiation of NR2F6 expression. Mol. Cancer 18, 119. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1046-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. Z., Lee, S. D., Sarkar, D., Lee, H. M., Khan, A., Bhati, C., et al. (2021a). Immunological characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 7, 6. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2020.113

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Sheng, W., Xu, T., Xu, J., Gao, R., and Zhang, Z. (2021b). CircRNA hsa_circ_0110102 inhibited macrophage activation and hepatocellular carcinoma progression via miR-580-5p/PPARα/CCL2 pathway. Aging (Albany NY) 13, 11969–11987. doi:10.18632/aging.202900

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Gao, R., Li, J., Tang, S., Li, S., Tong, Q., et al. (2021c). Downregulation of hsa_circ_0074854 suppresses the migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma via interacting with HuR and via suppressing exosomes-mediated macrophage M2 polarization. Int. J. Nanomedicine 16, 2803–2818. doi:10.2147/IJN.S284560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, F., Cai, G., Wang, Y., Zhuang, Q., Cai, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2024). Circular RNA-based neoantigen vaccine for hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy. MedComm 5, e667. doi:10.1002/mco2.667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, Y., Chen, X., Liang, C., Ling, Y., Yang, X., Ye, X., et al. (2020). A noncoding regulatory RNAs network driven by Circ-CDYL acts specifically in the early stages hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 71, 130–147. doi:10.1002/hep.30795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C., Deng, L., Zhuo, H., Chen, X., Tan, Z., Han, S., et al. (2020). Circulating circRNA predicting the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HBV infection. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24, 10216–10222. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, L., Feng, X., Hao, X., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Zheng, X., et al. (2019). CircSETD3 (Hsa_circ_0000567) acts as a sponge for microRNA-421 inhibiting hepatocellular carcinoma growth. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 98. doi:10.1186/s13046-019-1041-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, R., Zhang, Q., Cao, Q., Kong, R., Xiang, X., Liu, H., et al. (2022). Liver tumour immune microenvironment subtypes and neutrophil heterogeneity. Nature 612, 141–147. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05400-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X. H., Yamagiwa, S., Ichida, T., Matsuda, Y., Sugahara, S., Watanabe, H., et al. (2006). Increase of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells in the liver of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 45, 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2006.01.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, F., Yu, X., Zhou, C., Mao, R., Zhu, M., Zhu, H., et al. (2019). Hepatitis B e antigen induces the expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells to dampen T-cell function in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007690. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, L., Tan, W., Wang, M., Wei, Y., Xie, Z., Wang, Q., et al. (2025). circCCNY enhances lenvatinib sensitivity and suppresses immune evasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by serving as a scaffold for SMURF1 mediated HSP60 degradation. Cancer Lett. 612, 217470. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217470

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, M., Fang, M., Zheng, W.-J., and Yao, D.-F. (2018). Oncogenic Wnt3a: a promising specific biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Res. 4, 30. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2018.32

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yasuda, H., Nakagawa, M., Kiyokawa, H., Yoshida, E., Yoshimura, T., Koshikawa, N., et al. (2019). Unique biological activity and potential role of monomeric Laminin-γ2 as a novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 226. doi:10.3390/ijms20010226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yau, T., Kang, Y. K., Kim, T. Y., EL-Khoueiry, A. B., Santoro, A., Sangro, B., et al. (2020). Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: the CheckMate 040 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6, e204564. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, Y., Feng, W., Chen, J., Chen, X., Wang, G., Wang, S., et al. (2024). Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in the progression, metastasis, and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: from bench to bedside. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 72. doi:10.1186/s40164-024-00539-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

You, S., Luo, Z., Cheng, N., Wu, M., Lai, Y., Wang, F., et al. (2023). Magnetically responsive nanoplatform targeting circRNA circ_0058051 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 13, 782–794. doi:10.1007/s13346-022-01237-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Ding, W. B., Wang, M. C., Guo, X. G., Xu, J., Xu, Q. G., et al. (2020). Plasma circular RNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicenter study. Int. J. Cancer 146, 1754–1763. doi:10.1002/ijc.32647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, F., Tang, Y., Liang, H., Cao, M., Ren, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2025). CircPIK3C3 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma progression and lenvatinib resistance by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway via the miR-452-5p/SOX15 axis. Genomics 117, 110999. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2025.110999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeng, H., Zheng, R., Sun, K., Zhou, M., Wang, S., Li, L., et al. (2024). Cancer survival statistics in China 2019-2021: a multicenter, population-based study. J. Natl. Cancer Cent. 4, 203–213. doi:10.1016/j.jncc.2024.06.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Qian, Z., Zheng, W., Wu, Q., Chen, Y., et al. (2018). circRNA_104075 stimulates YAP-dependent tumorigenesis through the regulation of HNF4a and may serve as a diagnostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 9, 1091. doi:10.1038/s41419-018-1132-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Zhang, X. O., Jiang, T., Cai, L., Huang, X., Liu, Q., et al. (2020a). Comprehensive identification of alternative back-splicing in human tissue transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 1779–1789. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P. F., Gao, C., Huang, X. Y., Lu, J. C., Guo, X. J., Shi, G. M., et al. (2020b). Cancer cell-derived exosomal circUHRF1 induces natural killer cell exhaustion and May cause resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 19, 110. doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01222-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., Xu, C., Yang, Z., Zhou, J., Peng, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Circular RNAs in tumor immunity and immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 23, 171. doi:10.1186/s12943-024-02082-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, A. X., Finn, R. S., Edeline, J., Cattan, S., Ogasawara, S., Palmer, D., et al. (2018). Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19, 940–952. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, S., Yi, M., Wu, Y., Dong, B., and Wu, K. (2021). Roles of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor progression: implications on therapeutic strategies. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 10, 60. doi:10.1186/s40164-021-00252-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biomarker, circRNA, HCC, immune, microenviroment

Citation: Chen Y, Zhao J, Pu R, Fu C, Li Z, Yin J and Cao G (2026) Circular RNAs: roles in hepatocellular carcinoma immune regulation, implications in immunotherapy, and prospects for clinical translation. Front. Mol. Biosci. 12:1750832. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1750832

Received: 20 November 2025; Accepted: 25 December 2025;
Published: 12 January 2026.

Edited by:

Giovanni Nigita, The Ohio State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Massimo Bogliolo, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
Fatemeh Afra, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Copyright © 2026 Chen, Zhao, Pu, Fu, Li, Yin and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guangwen Cao, Z2Nhb0BzbW11LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.