Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly, and it is characterized by progressive impairment in multiple cognitive domains of sufficient severity to interfere with individuals’ daily living activities. Historically, the diagnosis of AD has been based on the identification of a clinical syndrome, and accuracy studies of the current clinical criteria conducted in referral clinics have shown high sensitivity for AD. However, the identification of the disease is still not perfect, and there is growing evidence that the use of biomarkers will increase our ability to better indentify the underlying biology of AD, especially in its early stages. These biomarkers will improve the detection of the patients suitable for research studies and drug trials, and they will contribute to a better management of the disease in the clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the most studied biomarkers in AD: cerebrospinal fluid proteins, structural magnetic resonance imaging, functional neuroimaging techniques, and amyloid imaging.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease (Ferri et al., 2005) and is characterized by a progressive dementia that occurs in middle or late life. The neuropathological hallmark of AD is the presence of cortical intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and extracellular β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques (Braak and Braak, 1991), which leads to synapse dysfunction, neuronal cell loss and subsequent brain atrophy (Ballard et al., 2011). In the past few decades the knowledge of the key pathogenic mechanisms of the disease has improved, but they are still not completely understood (Querfurth and LaFerla, 2010). The natural history of AD could be divided in three different phases: the pre-clinical phase, where the pathogenic mechanisms of the disease have started but no symptoms can be identified; the prodromal phase, where mild cognitive symptoms appear, but there are not severe enough to meet dementia criteria; and the dementia phase (Dubois et al., 2007). On the other hand, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical construct created to capture patients with subtle cognitive symptoms at risk for AD (Petersen et al., 2009). However, some subjects develop other types of dementias, do not progress, or even revert to normal cognition (Ganguli et al., 2004; Brooks and Loewenstein, 2010). Therefore, it is difficult to label MCI patients as having prodromal AD.
Currently, the most frequently used clinical diagnostic criteria for AD are the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR; APA, 2000) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders (NINCDS–ADRDA; McKhann et al., 1984) working group. These criteria are fulfilled in a two-step diagnostic process. First, the dementia syndrome is established and then, criteria based on the clinical features of the AD type dementia are applied. The DSM-IV-TR criteria require the presence of impairment in multiple cognitive domains of sufficient severity to interfere with the individuals’ activities of daily living to diagnose dementia. Hence, the clinical diagnosis of AD is not possible until a patient reach the dementia phase of the disease. On the other hand, these criteria have shown to have good sensitivity and specificity to distinguish between patients with AD type dementia and non-demented subjects, but are less accurate to differentiate AD dementia from other primary dementias (Knopman et al., 2001; Ballard et al., 2011). In fact, up to 20% of patients clinically diagnosed with AD do not have AD pathology at autopsy (Mayeux et al., 1998; Lim et al., 1999).
A more accurate and earlier diagnosis of AD (e.g., in MCI patients that will progress to the AD dementia phase or ideally those subjects in the pre-clinical phase) could enable the administration of potential disease-modifying drugs that would have a great impact on patients’ life and profound implications for public health (Brookmeyer et al., 1998). In this context, there is a need of specific biological markers for AD diagnosis in the earliest stages. A biomarker is defined as a measureable feature that can be used to diagnose a physiologic or pathologic condition. The ideal biomarker of AD would be: (1) directed at the fundamental pathophysiology of the disease, (2) a marker of the presence of disease itself, (3) efficacious at prodromal, and even pre-clinical stages of AD, (4) an indicator of disease’s severity, (5) a marker of treatment effectiveness, and (6) inexpensive and non-invasive (Klunk, 1998). In the case of AD, different biomarkers have been described using diverse approaches. The development of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) assays and neuroimaging techniques that can provide information about the presence of AD pathological changes has been a major step forward in the field. Consequently, biomarkers for AD are called to play a central role in the clinical characterization of the disease.
More recently, the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria have been revised by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA–AA) workgroup to include the experience in research over the past 25 years (McKhann et al., 2011). The NIA–AA proposed a series of diagnostic classification from pre-clinical AD to MCI to full-blown AD, and introduced CSF and neuroimaging biomarkers as supportive features of the disease (Albert et al., 2011; McKhann et al., 2011; Sperling et al., 2011). However, the authors cautioned about the use of biomarkers, and stated that their use should be limited to research and drug trials. Nevertheless, the core clinical criteria for AD remained relatively intact in the new criteria.
This review will focus on the most widely studied and currently accepted sources of biomarkers in AD: CSF, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Nuclear Medicine techniques, including amyloid imaging.
Biomarkers in CSF
Clinical studies employ mainly blood or CSF to search biochemical markers of neurodegenerative diseases. Typically, the CSF better reflects the brain neurochemistry, while biochemical values in plasma or serum may be affected by many non-neurological factors. CSF biomarker research has focused mainly on molecules related to the central neuropathological features of AD, such as Aβ, the main component of the senile neuritic plaques (SNP), and tau proteins that are part of the NFTs. Aβ is a 36–43 amino acid peptide originated from proteolysis of the amyloid protein precursor (Querfurth and LaFerla, 2010). SNPs are mainly composed by Aβ protein with 40 (Aβ40) or 42 (Aβ42) amino acids, and it seems that Aβ deposition begins with Aβ42, and during plaque maturation, they acquire Aβ40 (Iwatsubo et al., 1994). By contrast, NFTs are formed by tau proteins, a microtubule-associated stabilizing protein essential for axonal transport. Tau is hyperphosphorylated in AD, which tends to aggregate, leading to synaptic and neuronal dysfunction (Lee, 1996; Blennow et al., 2010; Querfurth and LaFerla, 2010). This process of NFTs formation starts in the entorhinal cortex, spreading to the hippocampus, and then to the rest of the brain. These neuropathological changes begin early, even decades before the onset of clinical symptoms of dementia (Braak and Braak, 1991), but the relative contributions of altered tau and amyloid metabolism to neurodegeneration remain under investigation. Nevertheless, NFTs are more robust associated with measures of synapse loss and cognitive impairment that SNPs (Gomez-Isla et al., 1997).
Typically, AD patients have lower levels of Aβ42 in the CSF compared to normal controls, Aβ40 tends to remain constant, and tau (t-tau) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) increase (Arai et al., 1995; Blennow et al., 1995; Motter et al., 1995; Vigo-Pelfrey et al., 1995; Galasko et al., 1998; Kurz et al., 1998; Shoji et al., 1998; Hulstaert et al., 1999; Andreasen et al., 2001; Sunderland et al., 2003; Lewczuk et al., 2004; Schoonenboom et al., 2004; Shaw et al., 2009). The low CSF Aβ42 levels in this entity may represent the retention of the peptide into plaques, resulting in reduced availability to diffuse into the CSF. This is supported by the findings that Aβ42 in the CSF is inversely correlated with amyloid plaque load at autopsy (Strozyk et al., 2003; Tapiola et al., 2009) and as measured in vivo by amyloid imaging (Fagan et al., 2006; Forsberg et al., 2008; Tolboom et al., 2009). The increase in t-tau and p-tau in the CSF of AD patients may stem from release into CSF during neurodegeneration (Blennow et al., 1995), although the exact mechanism is not known. T-tau and p-tau concentrations in the CSF have been associated with NFT load at autopsy (Buerger et al., 2006a; Tapiola et al., 2009), as well as with cognitive decline and brain atrophy (Buerger et al., 2002; Hampel et al., 2005; Fjell et al., 2010; Vemuri et al., 2010b).
Low CSF Aβ42 and high t-tau or p-tau proteins have shown high accuracy for AD diagnosis (Galasko et al., 1998; Andreasen et al., 2001; Schoonenboom et al., 2004). Studies that compared AD patients with normal control subjects have demonstrated that low Aβ42 had 78–100% sensitivity and 47–81% specificity for AD diagnosis; high CSF t-tau levels had 70% sensitivity and 92% specificity and p-tau showed 77% sensitivity and 87% specificity. However, p-tau appears to be better than t-tau in the diagnosis of AD, and it has shown a positive predictive value of 90%, especially p-tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181; Hampel et al., 2004a; Mitchell, 2009). Figure 1 shows the t-tau levels in AD, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and normal autopsied subjects, and Figure 2 shows the Aβ42 levels in the same population (Schoonenboom et al., 2004).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Because some studies found that Aβ42 and tau levels alone were not sufficient to differentiate AD from normal controls or other dementias, the Aβ42/tau ratio is used to improve the diagnosis of AD. A meta-analysis showed that the Aβ42/tau ratio had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 83% for AD (Hampel et al., 2004b); and a recent study showed that the “signature” of AD, based on the CSF Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio cutoffs, was present in 90% of the AD patients compared to 36% in the normal control group (De Meyer et al., 2010). Although, these CSF biomarkers seem to be useful to diagnose AD, they are not sensitive enough to assess disease progression (Sunderland et al., 1999; Vemuri et al., 2010b). Nevertheless, higher CSF t-tau and lower Aβ42 values have been associated with rapid cognitive decline, no response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment and a higher mortality in patients with AD dementia (Wallin et al., 2010).
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers might have a role in the differential diagnosis of AD and other dementias. Patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), like AD patients, have lower levels of Aβ42 in the CSF compared to normal controls, reflecting that most of these subjects also present AD pathology. Nevertheless, shorter amyloid peptides (Aβ37, Aβ38, and Aβ40) appear to be slightly more elevated in AD dementia (Bibl et al., 2006). Consequently, the Aβ42/Aβ37 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios seemed to better discriminate AD from DLB (Bibl et al., 2006; Mulugeta et al., 2010). T-tau and p-tau levels are normal or high in DLB, but most studies have shown that these markers’ levels in DLB are definitely lower than those found in AD. Other proposed biomarker for the differentiation of AD from DLB was monomeric soluble α-synuclein, but the available studies in DLB patients showed conflicting results. Elevated, unchanged and decreased total α-synuclein levels have been reported in these patients compared to AD and control subjects (Mukaetova-Ladinska et al., 2010). In addition, there are limited data about oligomeric α-synuclein in CSF, although it could be potential biomarker for synucleinopathies (Tokuda et al., 2010). Possibly, the combination of all these markers will help to distinguish between AD and DLB in the future.
In FTD, CSF Aβ42 levels are lower than in control subjects but higher than in AD, while t-tau and p-tau levels are higher than in controls but lower that in AD patients (Hulstaert et al., 1999; Riemenschneider et al., 2002). Hence, t-tau/Aβ42 and p-tau/Aβ42 ratios could be a useful tool to distinguish AD from FTD (Bian et al., 2008; Cruz de Souza et al., 2011). Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) is characterized by decreased CSF Aβ42 concentrations and very high t-tau levels, reflecting intense neuronal damage, while p-tau levels are normal (Kapaki et al., 2001; Riemenschneider et al., 2003; Buerger et al., 2006b). Current data suggest that p-tau levels could be the most relevant marker to differentiate AD from other types of dementias (Hampel et al., 2004b; Kapaki et al., 2007; Koopman et al., 2009).
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may also be useful in predicting progression to AD in subjects with MCI (Andreasen et al., 1999; Hampel et al., 2004c; Ewers et al., 2007; Brys et al., 2009). Low CSF Aβ42 levels predicted conversion with 60–80% sensitivity and 65–100% specificity, while t-tau levels had 83–86% sensitivity and 56–90% specificity, and p-tau had 73–84% sensitivity and 47–88% specificity (Hampel et al., 2004b). However, the conversion to AD dementia in MCI subjects has shown significant variability among different CSF studies. Hansson et al. (2006) found high sensitivity (95%) and specificity (87%) for the conversion from MCI to AD dementia using a combination of t-tau and Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio cutoff values. By contrast, a multicenter CSF study found lower sensitivity (83%) and specificity (72%) for the conversion from MCI to AD than single-site studies, with a considerable inter-site assay variability that highlights a need for standardization of analytical techniques and subject selection (Mattsson et al., 2009). Other large multicenter studies have confirmed the high predictive value of these CSF biomarkers in the identification of cases with prodromal AD in the context of the MCI syndrome (Shaw et al., 2009; Visser et al., 2009).
The CSF biomarkers have been used to identify the pre-clinical stage of AD. Cross-sectional studies in normal control individuals carrying the ApoE4 allele showed lower CSF Aβ42 and higher p-tau181 levels (Peskind et al., 2006; Kester et al., 2009; Shaw et al., 2009; Vemuri et al., 2010a). Interestingly, CSF levels of Aβ42 correlated with brain volume in this group of subjects, while in MCI and AD dementia patients, whole-brain volume correlated with CSF t-tau and p-tau181 (Fagan et al., 2009). A longitudinal CSF study in normal controls found increased t-tau levels and no change in Aβ42 after a 1-year follow-up (Vemuri et al., 2010b). A few longitudinal studies have assessed which CSF biomarker or combination of biomarkers better predict AD dementia or cognitive decline. Fagan et al. (2007) demonstrated that CSF tau/Aβ42 ratios may predict future dementia in cognitively normal older subjects and two other studies showed that low levels of CSF Aβ42 predicted cognitive decline, as measured with the mini mental status examination (MMSE; Gustafson et al., 2007; Stomrud et al., 2007). Although there are studies that showed that CSF Aβ42 could predict prodromal AD, there was a wide SD in these subjects, which made difficult to determine individually who will progress to AD. Further studies are needed to assess changes in CSF markers over time and to determine the best CSF markers of change.
Structural Neuroimaging Markers
Structural neuroimaging techniques are normally performed during the clinical assessment of patients with dementia, mainly to rule out structural lesions, such as brain tumors, normal pressure hydrocephalus, or vascular lesions. The MRI has shown high sensitivity to detect brain atrophy caused by the neurodegenerative process (Bobinski et al., 2000). Several methods are used to analyze MRI data including visual inspection, volumetry, or region of interest (ROI) analysis (applying manual tracing, automated, or semi-automated techniques) and voxel based morphometry (VBM; Vemuri and Jack, 2010). There are benefits and limitations of these methods. The visual rating of the images and ROI analysis depend on the a priori choice of structures, while VBM is a whole-brain operator-independent analysis (Ashburner and Friston, 2000). However, VBM analysis only allows comparing groups of patients, and it is not useful to classify individual cases. Visual assessment of MRI scans is a fast method to assess brain atrophy but is not the most precise (Raji et al., 2010). Volumetry of the medial temporal lobe structures is the most common quantitative method used in AD. The traditional manual tracing is time-consuming, and consequently, automated or semi-automated methods that require no significant manual intervention have been developed. Other methods to analyze sequential MRIs are boundary shift integral (BSI) and tensor-based morphometry (TBM). BSI has been developed to quantify the global percentage of change in the brain surfaces between two scans, while TBM provides a three-dimension profile of brain atrophy (Vemuri and Jack, 2010).
Brain MRI studies have shown that AD patients have a widespread cortical volume loss, including the frontal lobes, the temporoparietal regions, precuneus, and mesial temporal lobes, with relative sparing of the sensorimotor, visual, and cerebellar regions (Du et al., 2001; Good et al., 2001; Thompson et al., 2001; Karas et al., 2003; Testa et al., 2004; Ishii et al., 2005; Dickerson et al., 2008; Burton et al., 2009). Longitudinal studies have suggested that atrophy stars in the medial temporal lobes and fusiform gyrus in the prodromal phase of the disease, then spreads out to the posterior temporal and parietal lobes, and by the time of the dementia phase, it involves the medial temporal lobes, temporoparietal cortex, and the frontal lobe (Whitwell et al., 2007). This pattern of atrophy progression on MRI appears to follow the distribution of NFT in the different Braak and Braak (1991) pathological stages (Whitwell et al., 2008). In AD, there is also a greater rate of brain atrophy over time compared with healthy elderly subjects (1.9–2.2% per year versus 0.5–0.7% per year; O’Brien et al., 2001; Sluimer et al., 2008a,b; Henneman et al., 2009). Hippocampal and whole-brain atrophy in AD correlated well with cognitive performance and measures of disease severity (Jack et al., 2008a; Ridha et al., 2008; Schott et al., 2008).
In amnestic MCI subjects as a group, MRI studies show a similar pattern of brain atrophy to that observed in AD (Jack et al., 2000; Chetelat et al., 2002; Karas et al., 2004; Bell-McGinty et al., 2005; Whitwell et al., 2008) and rates of whole-brain atrophy are around 1% per year, between AD and control subjects (Jack et al., 2004). Whole-brain atrophy rate in MCI is associated with impaired cognitive performance (Evans et al., 2010) and predicts progression to AD dementia (Spulber et al., 2008). Whole-brain techniques have also shown that higher rates of atrophy in specific areas such as the hippocampus, posterior cingulated gyrus, and superior parietal cortex were associated with incident AD in MCI cases (Chetelat et al., 2005), and hippocampal and basal forebrain volumes in normal subjects predicted future development of AD (Hall et al., 2008). Interestingly, a recent study showed that normal subjects with the AD CSF profile had increased rates of brain atrophy over time, suggesting they may be in the pre-clinical phase of the neurodegenerative process (Schott et al., 2010). Nevertheless, this observation requires a longer follow-up period to demonstrate that this particular group of subjects has a higher risk to develop AD dementia.
Because the most important clinical manifestation of AD is memory loss, the majority of the researchers have focused on the study of hippocampal atrophy as a marker of the disease. Different neuroimaging studies assessing the mesial temporal lobe structures have consistently shown smaller hippocampal volumes in AD patients compared to controls (Pennanen et al., 2004). Measures of hippocampal atrophy correlate well with the degree of cognitive impairment (Jack et al., 2000; Mortimer et al., 2004) and with AD pathology and hippocampal sclerosis in MRI-post-mortem studies (Jagust et al., 2008). Both normal aging and AD have gradual volume loss overtime, but as with whole-brain volume is greater in AD; the annual rate of hippocampal atrophy is 1.41% for healthy controls and 4.66% for AD patients (Barnes et al., 2009). Several studies have shown that hippocampal atrophy measured by MRI predicts conversion from MCI to AD (Jack et al., 1999; Visser et al., 1999, 2002; Geroldi et al., 2006; Devanand et al., 2007; Teipel et al., 2007). A recent meta-analysis showed that this measure could identify MCI converters with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 81% (Yuan et al., 2009). Although decreased entorhinal cortical thickness has been proposed as a predictor of conversion from MCI to AD, measures of decrease hippocampal volume appeared to be a more robust predictor.
There are several limitations for the use of whole-brain or hippocampal volume as a sole biomarker for AD. One of the most important is that small brain volumes can also be seen in normal aging, and consequently, is difficult to separate cases with early AD from normal controls. On the other hand, the rate of change on whole-brain, entorhinal, and hippocampal volumes seemed to be good markers of neurodegeneration and they can be useful in determining the effects of AD therapies, but these techniques are labor intensive and limited to research studies.
Functional Neuroimaging Markers
Brain functional neuroimaging techniques – positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) – allow a broad range of cerebral functions to be assessed in patients currently living with dementia. Actually, brain metabolism, brain perfusion, and different neurotransmitter systems can be measured with a great variety of PET and SPECT tracers. However, brain metabolism with the glucose analog 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) and brain perfusion with technetium-99m hexamethylpropylamine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO) are the two more widely employed techniques in the evaluation of patients with dementia, both in clinical practice and in research. Brain SPECT with 99mTc-HMPAO studies provide information of the regional cerebral blood flow, and 18F-FDG PET estimates the regional brain rate of glucose consumption, therefore providing information about the pattern of neuronal loss or synapse dysfunction in patients with dementia.
The pattern of SPECT hypoperfusion and PET hypometabolism usually seen AD involves the anterior medial temporal lobes, the posterior cingulate and posterior temporoparietal cortex (Kogure et al., 2000; Ishii et al., 2001; Alexander et al., 2002; Bradley et al., 2002). Nevertheless, SPECT seems to be less accurate than PET for the diagnosis of AD. One autopsy study found that this technique alone had a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 93% to diagnose AD (Jagust et al., 2001). On the other hand, SPECT seemed to be useful differentiating AD from other dementias. The sensitivity of this procedure discriminating AD from FTD was 71.5% and the specificity was 78.2%, while its sensitivity and specificity to differentiate AD from vascular dementia were 71.3 and 75.9%, respectively (Dougall et al., 2004). In MCI patients, SPECT has shown that can predict conversion to AD with a test accuracy of 82% (Huang et al., 2007).
Positron emission tomography studies in early AD have shown a pattern of reduced metabolism in the posterior cingulate (Minoshima et al., 1997) and mesial temporal cortices. As the disease progresses, there is a greater involvement of the parietotemporal and frontal cortices (Ishii et al., 2001; Silverman et al., 2001; Alexander et al., 2002; Drzezga et al., 2003). This progression of the areas of hypometabolism correlated with cognitive deterioration over time as measured by neuropsychological tests (Engler et al., 2006; Kadir et al., 2010) and dementia severity scales (Foster et al., 1984; Minoshima et al., 1995; Silverman et al., 2001; Mosconi et al., 2005). A meta-analysis showed that pooled 18F-FDG PET sensitivity and specificity to differentiate AD patients from normal subjects were 86% in both cases, but the variability was important between the studies (sensitivity from 61 to 100% and specificity from 54 to 100%; Patwardhan et al., 2004). PET also seems to be a good tool to differentiate AD from other forms of dementia. In an autopsy confirmed study, the presence of occipital hypometabolism was able to distinguish DLB from AD with 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity (Minoshima et al., 2001). This technique also has a high specificity and sensibility to differentiate AD and FTD (Koeppe et al., 2005; Foster et al., 2007; Panegyres et al., 2009).
18F-FDG PET appears to be a promising instrument to discriminate those patients with MCI who will progress to AD dementia. These patients show a medial temporal and posterior cingulate cortices hypometabolism compared with healthy controls (Chetelat et al., 2003; Anchisi et al., 2005; Drzezga et al., 2005). A recent meta-analysis has also shown that 18F-FDG PET performs slightly better than SPECT and structural MRI in identifying the prodromal phase of AD in patients with a clinical diagnosis of MCI (pooled sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 85%; Yuan et al., 2009). Interestingly, similar metabolic reductions in the same regions as those found in MCI and AD patients have been seen in asymptomatic subjects at risk of AD, i.e., in persons with subjective memory complains (Caselli et al., 2008), carriers of an apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE4) allele (Reiman et al., 1996, 2001, 2004, 2005), with abnormalities in the CSF markers (Petrie et al., 2009), or with a maternal history of AD (Mosconi et al., 2007, 2009). Furthermore, hippocampal hypometabolism during normal aging predicted cognitive decline years in advance of the clinical diagnosis (de Leon et al., 2001; Jagust et al., 2006; Mosconi et al., 2008). Taken together, these data indicate that 18F-FDG PET has high sensitivity to distinguish AD from controls and from other dementing entities, and also to identify subjects at high AD risk. Consequently, the PET AD pattern has been incorporated into the new clinical criteria for prodromal AD (Dubois et al., 2007), pre-clinical AD (Sperling et al., 2011), and MCI due to AD (Albert et al., 2011).
Molecular Neuroimaging Markers
The development of PET radiotracers that bind to brain amyloid has revolutionized the use of neuroimaging techniques in patients with dementia. These molecules allow the localization of AD pathology in vivo, and have helped to further our understanding of the underlying biology of AD. The most actively tested tracers are N-methyl-[11C]2-(4′-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole (11C-PIB; Klunk et al., 2003), (E)-4-(2-(6-(2-(2-(2-(18)F-fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)pyridin-3-yl)vinyl)-N-methyl benzenamine (18F-AV-45; Choi et al., 2009) and 2-(1-96-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino)-2-naphthyl)ethyldene) malono nitrile (18F-FDDNP; Small et al., 2006; Shin et al., 2008), but there are multiple 11C and 18F compounds under investigation such as trans-4-(N-methyl-amino)-4′-{2-[2-(2-[18F]fluoro-ethoxy)-ethoxy]-ethoxy}-stilbene (18F-BAY94-9172; Rowe et al., 2008), 4-N-[11C-methyl]amino-4′-hydroxystilbene (11C-SB-13; Verhoeff et al., 2004) and 2-(2-[2-dimethylaminothiazol-5-yl]ethenyl)-6-(2-[fluoro]ethoxy)benzoxazole (11C-BF-227; Kudo et al., 2007). While 11C have better affinity for fibrillar amyloid than 18F compounds, the former have a very short life, which limits its use to centers with an available cyclotron that can produce them. Among these tracers, 11C-PIB is the most widely used and best characterized. This thioflavin-T derived binds fibrillar Aβ with high affinity and its brain retention correlates well with levels of amyloid in AD brain tissue (Mathis et al., 2002, 2003; Klunk et al., 2004; Ikonomovic et al., 2008; Leinonen et al., 2008).
Positron emission tomography studies with 11C-PIB have demonstrated an increased retention of this tracer in frontal and parietotemporal cortices, as well as in the striatum of almost all AD patients compared with controls (Klunk et al., 2004; Edison et al., 2006; Rowe et al., 2007). However, it is important to note that a positive 11C-PIB PET scan can also be seen in other entities, often misdiagnosed as AD, such as DLB and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (Edison et al., 2008; Gomperts et al., 2008; Dierksen et al., 2010). 11C-PIB retention in AD correlates with rates of whole-brain atrophy (Archer et al., 2006), parietotemporal hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET (Klunk et al., 2004; Edison et al., 2006; Engler et al., 2006), and decreased CSF Aβ42 levels (Fagan et al., 2006; Grimmer et al., 2009; Jagust et al., 2009). There are few longitudinal studies using amyloid ligands, and the observation time has been relatively short, because these techniques have only been available for research since 2004. Recent longitudinal studies in AD patients assessing amyloid load and progression of neurodegeneration using structural MRI or 18F-FDG PET found that 11C-PIB retention was relatively stable over time, while neurodegenerative markers worsen in parallel with cognitive decline (Engler et al., 2006; Jack et al., 2009; Scheinin et al., 2009; Kadir et al., 2010). These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that there is dissociation between the amyloid deposition and the neurodegenerative process, where amyloid accumulation precedes the clinical symptoms and reaches its maximum detectable level before the cognitive deficits are evident (Jack et al., 2010a). However, another recent study has shown increases of 11C-PIB retention in mild to moderate AD dementia, questioning this hypothesis and suggesting that Aβ deposition might slow down in the later stages of the disease, but it is still present (Villemagne et al., 2011).
In MCI patients, 11C-PIB PET shows a bimodal distribution with some subjects having a pattern of retention similar to AD patients and others similar to control subjects (Pike et al., 2007; Rowe et al., 2007; Jack et al., 2009; Wolk et al., 2009). In these patients, the Aβ burden is related to episodic memory impairment but not to other cognitive tasks (Pike et al., 2007). The PIB-positive MCI subjects are more likely to carry an ApoE4 allele and to progress to AD (Pike et al., 2007; Forsberg et al., 2008; Okello et al., 2009; Wolk et al., 2009; Jack et al., 2010b). Factors that seem to influence a shorter time to progression in PIB-positive subjects is the presence of hippocampal atrophy, higher 11C-PIB retention values and having an ApoE4 allele (Okello et al., 2009; Jack et al., 2010b; Koivunen et al., 2011). Longitudinal studies assessing changes in 11C-PIB retention in MCI patients are contradictory. Jack et al. (2009) rescanned MCI subjects after a single year, but only a minimal change has seen in this group of persons. However, Villemagne et al. (2011) have shown small but significant increases in 11C-PIB cortical retention in MCI patients from the baseline studies to scans to those performed from 20 months to 3 years later; other studies have reported similar results (Kadir et al., 2010; Koivunen et al., 2011).
In agreement with autopsy data (Price and Morris, 1999), approximately 20–30% of elderly cognitively normal subjects show some degree of 11C-PIB retention, mainly in the prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate and precuneus regions (Mintun et al., 2006; Pike et al., 2007; Rowe et al., 2007; Aizenstein et al., 2008). In fact, the proportion of 11C-PIB-positive healthy control subjects increases with age (Morris et al., 2010). In these subjects, some studies have reported a strong relationship between impaired episodic memory performance and 11C-PIB binding that could be modified by cognitive reserve (Pike et al., 2007; Mormino et al., 2009; Rentz et al., 2010), but some others have not found this association (Mintun et al., 2006; Jack et al., 2008b; Stornadt et al., 2009). Studies directly relating structural MRI data to Aβ burden in control subjects has yield contradictory results. Some authors have reported reduced hippocampal volume (Mormino et al., 2009; Stornadt et al., 2009), a cortical thinning pattern consistent with early AD (Dickerson et al., 2008; Becker et al., 2010) and an increased rate of brain atrophy (Scheinin et al., 2009), while others have found brain atrophy only in 11C-PIB-positive subjects or in normal individuals with subjective cognitive impairment (Chetelat et al., 2010). There are only two longitudinal studies reporting progression of cognitively normal subjects scanned with 11C-PIB PET to symptomatic AD. In one study, Morris et al. (2009) reported that the relative risk of conversion from cognitive normal to AD was increased almost five-fold with a 11C-PIB-positive PET scan. Villemagne et al. (2011) performed serial 11C-PIB PET scans in a group of normal subjects and found that 25% of individuals with a positive scan developed MCI or AD dementia by 3 years. In addition, the authors also reported an increase in 11C-PIB brain retention in those control subjects with a positive baseline scan, suggesting a slow process of Aβ accumulation in the brain over time (Villemagne et al., 2011). These data are consistent with the hypothesis that amyloid imaging can detect Aβ accumulation in advance of the onset of dementia (Jack et al., 2010a), although more longitudinal studies are required to determinate the sequence of pathological events in the process from normalcy to AD. Figure 3 shows the spectrum of amyloid deposition in normal controls, MCI and AD cases, as measured with 11C-PIB PET (Mathis et al., 2007).
Figure 3
Although amyloid imaging is a relatively new technique, we can state that it accurately detects Aβ accumulation in the brain. However, it has been reported the case of a patient clinically diagnosed of mild AD with a negative 11C-PIB PET scan, where low levels of amyloid pathology at autopsy were found (Cairns et al., 2009). On the other hand, there are not reported cases of subjects with a positive amyloid PET without presence of Aβ at autopsy. These data suggests that 11C-PIB PET is a technique with high specificity and positive predictive value for early AD diagnosis. Nevertheless, having an 11C-PIB-positive scan does not mean to be at a pre-dementia stage of AD, and the prognostic value of increased Aβ load on PET has to be established with more extensive longitudinal studies. In this scenario, adding techniques that assess functional brain changes suggesting early AD could be of special interest. Definitely, the information obtained with current amyloid tracers will bring to light important issues in the biology of amyloid deposition in the transition from normal to AD.
Conclusion
In this review, several potential AD biomarkers in different modalities have been highlighted. Current data suggest that diagnosis of AD can be enhanced by use of these promising biomarkers to increase accuracy and identify early stages of the disease. Each of these biomarkers seems to indicate a specific process in AD, so that amyloid imaging and decreased CSF Aβ42 are indicators of brain amyloid burden, while CSF tau, brain atrophy and brain metabolism are biomarkers of the neurodegenerative process. Some authors have proposed a model of disease in which there is timing for the use of different biomarkers (Jack et al., 2010a). The AD pathologic cascade appears to have a sequential two stage process initiated by amyloid accumulation and followed by neuronal pathology. To validate this hypothesis and the right use of biomarkers in the clinical practice, it is necessary to determine the dynamics of the amyloid process with other biomarkers at the different stages of the disease. An early AD diagnosis could enable to administer treatments with potential disease-modifying effect before neurodegeneration becomes severe.
Statements
Acknowledgments
Mario Riverol is supported by a grant from Fundación Caja Madrid (Spain). Oscar L. López is supported in part by grants AG200098 and AG05133-27 from the National Institute on Aging.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AizensteinH. J.NebesR. D.SaxtonJ. A.PriceJ. C.MathisC. A.TsopelasN. D.ZiolkoS. K.JamesJ. A.SnitzB. E.HouckP. R.BiW.CohenA. D.LoprestiB. J.DeKoskyS. T.HalliganE. M.KlunkW. E. (2008). Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly.Arch. Neurol.65, 1509–1517.10.1001/archneur.65.11.1509
2
AlbertM. S.DekoskyS. T.DicksonD.DuboisB.FeldmanH. H.FoxN. C.GamstA.HoltzmanD. M.JagustW. J.PetersenR. C.SnyderP. J.CarrilloM. C.ThiesB.PhelpsC. H. (2011). The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association workgroup.Alzheimers Dement.7, 270–279.10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
3
AlexanderG. E.ChenK.PietriniP.RapoportS. I.ReimanE. M. (2002). Longitudinal PET evaluation of cerebral metabolic decline in dementia: a potential outcome measure in Alzheimer’s disease treatment studies.Am. J. Psychiatry159, 738–745.10.1176/appi.ajp.159.5.738
4
AnchisiD.BorroniE.FranceschiM.KerroucheN.KalbeE.Beuthien-BeumannB.CappaS. (2005). Heterogeneity of brain glucose metabolism in mild cognitive impairment and clinical progression to Alzheimer’s disease.Arch. Neurol.62, 1728–1733.10.1001/archneur.62.11.1728
5
AndreasenN.MinthonL.DavidsonP.VanmechelenE.VandersticheleH.WinbladB.BlennowK. (2001). Evaluation of CSF-tau and CSF-alpha beta 42 as diagnostic markers for Alzheimer disease in clinical practice.Arch. Neurol.58, 373–379.10.1001/archneur.58.3.373
6
AndreasenN.MinthonL.VanmechelenE.VandersticheleH.DavidssonP.WinbladB.BlennowK. (1999). Cerebrospinal fluid tau and Abeta42 as predictors of development of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.Neurosci. Lett.273, 5–8.10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00617-5
7
APA. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR Fourth Edition (Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
8
AraiH.TerajimaM.MiuraM.HiguchiS.MuramatsuT.MachidaN.SeikiH.TakaseS.ClarkC. M.LeeV. M. (1995). Tau in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential diagnostic marker in Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.38, 649–652.10.1002/ana.410380414
9
ArcherH. A.EdisonP.BrooksD. J.BarnesJ.FrostC.YeatmanT.FoxN. C.RossorM. N. (2006). Amyloid load and cerebral atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease: an 11C-PIB positron emission tomography study.Ann. Neurol.60, 145–147.10.1002/ana.20889
10
AshburnerJ.FristonK. J. (2000). Voxel-based morphometry – the methods.Neurology11, 805–821.
11
BallardC.GauthierS.CorbettA.BrayneC.AarslandD.JonesE. (2011). Alzheimer’s disease.Lancet377, 1019–1031.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61349-9
12
BarnesJ.BartlettJ. W.van de PolL. A.LoyC. T.ScahillR. I.FrostC.ThompsonP.FoxN. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiol. Aging30, 1711–1723.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.01.010
13
BeckerJ. A.HeddenT.CarmasinJ.MayeJ.RentzD. M.PutchaD.FischlB.GreveD. N.MarshallG. A.SallowayS.MarksD.BucknerR. L.SperlingR. A.JohnsonK. A. (2010). Amyloid-beta associated cortical thinning in clinically normal elderly.Ann. Neurol.69, 1032–1042.10.1002/ana.22333
14
Bell-McGintyS.LopezO. L.MeltzerC. C.ScanlonJ. M.WhyteE. M.DeKoskyS. T.BeckerJ. T. (2005). Differential cortical atrophy in subgroups of mild cognitive impairment.Arch. Neurol.62, 1393–1397.10.1001/archneur.62.9.1393
15
BianH.Van SwietenJ. C.LeightS.MassimoL.WoodE.FormanM.MooreP.de KoningI.ClarkC. M.RossoS.TrojanowskiJ.LeeV. M.GrossmanM. (2008). CSF biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with known pathology.Neurology70, 1827–1835.10.1212/01.wnl.0000311445.21321.fc
16
BiblM.MollenhauerB.EsselmannH.LewczukP.KlafkiH. W.SparbierK.SmirnovA.CepekL.TrenkwalderC.RutherE.KornhuberJ.OttoM.WiltfangJ. (2006). CSF amyloid-beta-peptides in Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease dementia.Brain129, 1177–1187.10.1093/brain/awl063
17
BlennowK.HampelH.WeinerM.ZetterbergH. (2010). Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease.Nat. Rev. Neurol.6, 131–144.10.1038/nrneurol.2010.4
18
BlennowK.WallinA.AgrenH.SpengerC.SiegfriedJ.VanmechelenE. (1995). Tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a biochemical marker for axonal degeneration in Alzheimer disease?Mol. Chem. Neuropathol.26, 231–245.10.1007/BF02815140
19
BobinskiM.de LeonM. J.WegielJ.DesantiS.ConvitA.Saint LouisL. A.RusinekH.WisniewskiH. M. (2000). The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging-determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuroscience95, 721–725.10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00476-5
20
BraakH.BraakE. (1991). Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.Acta Neuropathol.82, 239–259.10.1007/BF00308809
21
BradleyK. M.O’SullivanV. T.SoperN. D. W.NagyZ.KingE. M.-F.SmithA. D.ShepstoneB. J. (2002). Cerebral perfusion SPET correlated with Braak pathological stage in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain125, 1772–1781.10.1093/brain/awf185
22
BrookmeyerR.GrayS.KawasC. (1998). Projections of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset.Am. J. Public Health88, 1337–1342.10.2105/AJPH.88.9.1337
23
BrooksL. G.LoewensteinD. A. (2010). Assessing the progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease: current trends and future directions.Alzheimers Res. Ther.2, 28.
24
BrysM.PirragliaE.RichK.RolstadS.MosconiL.SwitalskiR.Glodzik-SobanskaL.De SantiS.ZinkowskiR.MehtaP.PraticoD.Saint LouisL. A.WallinA.BlennowK.de LeonM. J. (2009). Prediction and longitudinal study of CSF biomarkers in mild cognitive impairment.Neurobiol. Aging30, 682–690.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.010
25
BuergerK.EwersM.PirttilaT.ZinkowskiR.AlafuzoffI.TeipelS. J.DeBernardisJ.KerkmanD.McCullochC.SoininenH.HampelH. (2006a). CSF phosphorylated tau protein correlates with neocortical neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain129, 3035–3041.10.1093/brain/awl269
26
BuergerK.OttoM.TeipelS. J.ZinkowskiR.BlennowK.DeBernardisJ.KerkmanD.SchroderJ.SchonknechtP.CepekL.McCullochC.MollerH. J.WiltfangJ.KretzschmarH.HampelH. (2006b). Dissociation between CSF total tau and tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.Neurobiol. Aging27, 10–15.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.12.003
27
BuergerK.TeipelS. J.ZinkowskiR.BlennowK.AraiH.EngelR.Hoffmann-KieferK.McCullochC.PtokU.HeunR.AndreasenN.DeBernardisJ.KerkmanD.MoellerH.-J.DaviesP.HampelH. (2002). CSF tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 correlates with cognitive decline in MCI subjects.Neurology59, 627–629.
28
BurtonE. J.BarberR.Mukaetova-LadinskaE. B.RobsonJ.PerryR. H.JarosE.KalariaR. N.O’BrienJ. T. (2009). Medial temporal lobe atrophy on MRI differentiates Alzheimer’s disease from dementia with Lewy bodies and vascular cognitive impairment: a prospective study with pathological verification of diagnosis.Brain132, 195–203.10.1093/brain/awn298
29
CairnsN. J.IkonomovicM. D.BenzingerT.StorandtM.FaganA. M.ShahA. R.ReinwaldL. T.CarterD.FeltonA.HoltzmanD. M.MintunM. A.KlunkW. E.MorrisJ. C. (2009). Absence of Pittsburgh compound B detection of cerebral amyloid beta in a patient with clinical, cognitive, and cerebrospinal fluid markers of Alzheimer disease: a case report.Arch. Neurol.66, 1557–1562.10.1001/archneurol.2009.279
30
CaselliR. J.ChenK.LeeW.AlexanderG. E.ReimanE. M. (2008). Correlating cerebral hypometabolism with future memory decline in subsequent converters to amnestic pre-mild cognitive impairment.Arch. Neurol.65, 1231–1236.10.1001/archneurol.2008.1
31
ChetelatG.DesgrangesB.de la SayetteV.ViaderF.EustacheF.BaronJ.-C. (2002). Mapping gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild cognitive impairment.Neuroreport13, 1939–1943.10.1097/00001756-200210280-00022
32
ChetelatG.DesgrangesB.de la SayetteV.ViaderF.EustacheF.BaronJ.-C. (2003). Mild cognitive impairment. Can FDG-PET predict who is to rapidly convert to Alzheimer’s disease?Neurology60, 1374–1377.
33
ChetelatG.LandeauB.EustacheF.MezengeF.ViaderF.de la SayetteV.DesgrangesB.BaronJ. C. (2005). Using voxel-based morphometry to map the structural changes associated with rapid conversion in MCI: a longitudinal MRI study.Neuroimage27, 934–946.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.015
34
ChetelatG.VillemagneV. L.BourgeatP.PikeK. E.JonesG.AmesD.EllisK. A.SzoekeC.MartinsR. N.O’KeefeG. J.SalvadoO.MastersC. L.RoweC. C. (2010). Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease.Ann. Neurol.67, 317–324.
35
ChoiS. R.GoldingG.ZhuangZ.ZhangW.LimN.HeftiF.BenedumT. E.KilbournM. R.SkovronskyD.KungH. F. (2009). Preclinical properties of 18F-AV-45: a PET agent for Abeta plaques in the brain.J. Nucl. Med.50, 1887–1894.10.2967/jnumed.109.065284
36
Cruz de SouzaL.LamariF.BelliardS.JardelC.HouillierC.De PazR.DuboisB.SarazinM. (2011). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease from other cortical dementias.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.82, 240–246.10.1136/jnnp.2010.207183
37
de LeonM. J.ConvitA.WolfO. T.TarshishC. Y.DeSantiS.RusinekH.TsuiW.KandilE.SchererA. J.RocheA.ImossiA.ThornE.BobinskiM.CaraosC.LesbreP.SchlyerD.PoirierJ.ReisbergB.FowlerJ. (2001). Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.98, 10966–10971.10.1073/pnas.191044198
38
De MeyerG.ShapiroF.VandersticheleH.VanmechelenE.EngelborghsS.De DeynP. P.CoartE.HanssonO.MinthonL.ZetterbergH.BlennowK.ShawL.TrojanowskiJ. Q. (2010). Diagnosis-independent Alzheimer disease biomarker signature in cognitively normal elderly people.Arch. Neurol.67, 949–956.10.1001/archneurol.2010.179
39
DevanandD. P.PradhabanG.LiuX.KhandjiA.DeSantiS.SegalS.RusineckH.PeltonG. H.HonigL. S.MayeuxR.StrenY.TabertM. H.de LeonM. J. (2007). Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment. Prediction of Alzheimer disease.Neurology68, 828–836.10.1212/01.wnl.0000256697.20968.d7
40
DickersonB. C.BakkourA.SalatD. H.FeczkoE.PachecoJ.GreveD. N.GrodsteinF.WrightC. I.BlackerD.RosasH. D.SperlingR. A.AtriA.GrowdonJ. H.HymanB. T.MorrisJ. C.FischlB.BucknerR. L. (2008). The cortical signature of Alzheimer’s disease: regionally specific cortical thinning relates to symptom severity in very mild to mild AD dementia and is detectable in asymptomatic amyloid-positive individuals.Cereb. Cortex19, 497–510.10.1093/cercor/bhn113
41
DierksenG. A.SkehanM. E.KhanM. A.JengJ.NandigamR. N.BeckerJ. A.KumarA.NealK. L.BetenskyR. A.FroschM. P.RosandJ.JohnsonK. A.ViswanathanA.SalatD. H.GreenbergS. M. (2010). Spatial relation between microbleeds and amyloid deposits in amyloid angiopathy.Ann. Neurol.68, 545–548.10.1002/ana.22099
42
DougallN. J.BrugginkS.EbmeierK. P. (2004). Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of 99-m-Tc-HMPAO-SPECT in dementia.Psychiatry12, 554–570.
43
DrzezgaA.GrimmerT.RiemenschneiderM.LautenschlagerN.SiebnerH.AlexopolousP.MinoshimaS.SchwaigerM.KurzA. (2005). Prediction of individual clinical outcome in MCI by means of genetic assessment and (18)-FDG PET.J. Nucl. Med.46, 1625–1632.
44
DrzezgaA.LautenschlagerN.SiebnerH.RiemenschneiderM.WillochF.MinoshimaS.SchwaigerM.KurzA. (2003). Cerebral metabolic changes accompanying conversion of mild cognitive impairment into Alzheimer’s disease: a PET follow-up study.Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging30, 1104–11013.10.1007/s00259-003-1194-1
45
DuA. T.SchuffN.AmendD.LaaksoM. P.HsuY. Y.JagustW. J.YaffeK.FramerJ. H.ReedB.NormanD.ChuiH. C.WeinerM. W. (2001). Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.71, 441–447.10.1136/jnnp.71.4.441
46
DuboisB.FeldmanH. H.JacovaC.DekoskyS. T.Barberger-GateauP.CummingsJ.DelacourteA.GalaskoD.GauthierS.JichaG.MeguroK.O’BrienJ.PasquierF.RobertP.RossorM.SallowayS.SternY.VisserP. J.ScheltensP. (2007). Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.Lancet Neurol.6, 734–746.10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
47
EdisonP.ArcherA.HinzR.HammersA.PaveseN.TaiY. F.HottonG.CutlerD.FoxN. C.KennedyA.RossorM.BrooksD. J. (2006). Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease. An [11C] PIB and [18F] FDG PET study.Neurology67, 1–8.10.1212/01.wnl.0000223845.60960.d7
48
EdisonP.RoweC. C.RinneJ. O.NgS.AhmedI.KemppainenN.VillemagneV. L.O’KeefeG.NagrenK.ChaudhuryK. R.MastersC. L.BrooksD. J. (2008). Amyloid load in Parkinson’s disease dementia and Lewy body dementia measured with [11C]PIB positron emission tomography.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.79, 1331–1338.10.1136/jnnp.2007.127878
49
EnglerH.ForsbergA.AlmkvistO.BlomquistG.LarssonE.SavitchevaI.WallA.RingheimA.LangstromB.NordbergA. (2006). Two-year follow-up of amyloid deposition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.Brain129, 2856–2866.10.1093/brain/awl178
50
EvansM. C.BarnesJ.NielsenC.KimL. G.CleggS. L.BlairM.LeungK. K.DouiriA.BoyesR. G.OurselinS.FoxN. C. (2010). Volume changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: cognitive associations.Eur. Radiol.20, 674–682.10.1007/s00330-009-1581-5
51
EwersM.BuergerK.TeipelS. J.ScheltensP.SchroderJ.ZinkowskiR. P.BouwmanF. H.SchonknechtP.SchoonenboomN. S.AndreasenN.WallinA.DeBernardisJ. F.KerkmanD. J.HeindlB.BlennowK.HampelH. (2007). Multicenter assessment of CSF-phosphorylated tau for the prediction of conversion of MCI.Neurology69, 2205–2212.10.1212/01.wnl.0000286944.22262.ff
52
FaganA. M.HeadD.ShahA. R.MarcusD.MintunM.MorrisJ. C.HoltzmanD. M. (2009). Decreased cerebrospinal fluid Abeta(42) correlates with brain atrophy in cognitively normal elderly.Ann. Neurol.65, 176–183.10.1002/ana.21559
53
FaganA. M.MintunM. A.MachR. H.LeeS. Y.DenceC. S.ShahA. R.LaRossaG. N.SpinnerM. L. (2006). Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.Ann. Neurol.59, 512–519.10.1002/ana.20730
54
FaganA. M.RoeC. M.XiongC.MintunM. A.MorrisJ. C.HoltzmanD. M. (2007). Cerebrospinal fluid tau/beta-amyloid12 ratio as a prediction of cognitive decline in nondemented older adults.Arch. Neurol.64, 343–349.10.1001/archneur.64.3.noc60123
55
FerriC. P.PrinceM.BrayneC.BrodatyH.FrataglioniL.GanguliM.HallK.HasegawaK.HendrieH.HuangY.JormA.MathersC.MenezesP. R.RimmerE.ScazufcaM. (2005). Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study.Lancet366, 2112–2117.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0
56
FjellA. M.WalhovdK. B.Fennema-NotestineC.McEvoyL. K.HaglerD. J.HollandD.BrewerJ. B.DaleA. M. (2010). CSF biomarkers in prediction of cerebral and clinical change in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.J. Neurosci.30, 2088–2101.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3785-09.2010
57
ForsbergA.EnglerH.AlmkvistO.BlomquistG.HagmanG.WallA.RingheimA.LangstromB.NordbergA. (2008). PET imaging of amyloid deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment.Neurobiol. Aging29, 1456–1465.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.029
58
FosterN. L.ChaseT. N.MansiL.BrooksR.FedioP.PatronasN. J.DiChiroG. (1984). Cortical abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.16, 649–654.10.1002/ana.410160605
59
FosterN. L.HeidebrinkJ. L.ClarkC. M.JagustW. J.ArnoldS. E.BarbasN. R.DeCarliC. S.TurnerR. S.KoeppeR. A.HigdonR.MinoshimaS. (2007). FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.Brain130, 2616–2635.10.1093/brain/awm177
60
GalaskoD.ChangL.MotterR.ClarkC. M.KayeJ.KnopmanD.ThomasR.KholodenkoD.SchenkD.LieberburgI.MillerB.GreenR.BasheradR.KertilesL.BossM. A.SeubertP. (1998). High cerebrospinal fluid tau and low amyloid beta42 levels in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and relation to apolipoprotein E genotype.Arch. Neurol.55, 937–945.10.1001/archneur.55.7.937
61
GanguliM.DodgeH. H.ShenC.DeKoskyS. T. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study.Neurology63, 115–121.
62
GeroldiC.RossiR.CalvagnaC.TestaC.BrescianiL.BinettiG.ZanettiO.FrisoniG. B. (2006). Medial temporal atrophy but not memory deficit predicts progression to dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.77, 1219–1222.10.1136/jnnp.2005.082651
63
Gomez-IslaT.HollisterR.WestH.MuiS.GrowdomJ. H.PetersenR. C. (1997). Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.41, 17–24.10.1002/ana.410410618
64
GompertsS. N.RentzD. M.MoranE.BeckerJ. A.LocascioJ. J.KlunkW. E.MathisC. A.ElmalehD. R.ShoupT.FischmanA. J.HymanB. T.GrowdonJ. H.JohnsonK. A. (2008). Imaging amyloid deposition in Lewy body diseases.Neurology71, 903–910.10.1212/01.wnl.0000326146.60732.d6
65
GoodC. D.ScahillR. T.FoxN. C.AshburnerJ.FristonK. J.ChanD.GrumW. R.RossorM. N.FrackowiakR. S. J. (2001). Automatic differentiation of anatomical patterns in the human brain. Validation with studies of degenerative dementias.Neuroimage17, 29–46.10.1006/nimg.2002.1202
66
GrimmerT.RiemenschneiderM.ForstlH.HenriksenG.KlunkW. E.MathisC. A.ShigaT.WesterH. J.KurzA.DrzezgaA. (2009). Beta amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease: increased deposition in brain is reflected in reduced concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.Biol. Psychiatry65, 927–934.10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.01.027
67
GustafsonD. R.SkoogI.RosengrenL.ZetterbergH.BlennowK. (2007). Cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 1-42 concentration may predict cognitive decline in older women.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.78, 461–464.10.1136/jnnp.2006.100529
68
HallA. M.MooreR. Y.LopezO. L.KullerL. H.BeckerJ. T. (2008). Basal forebrain atrophy is a presymptomatic marker for Alzheimer’s disease.Alzheimers Dement.4, 271–279.10.1016/j.jalz.2008.05.503
69
HampelH.BuergerK.ZinkowskiR.TeipelS. J.GoernitzA.AndreasenN.SjoegrenM.DeBernardisJ.KerkmanD.IshiguroK.OhnoH.VanmechelenE.VandersticheleH.McCullochC.MollerH. J.DaviesP.BlennowK. (2004a). Measurement of phosphorylated tau epitopes in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a comparative cerebrospinal fluid study.Arch. Gen. Psychiatry61, 95–102.10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.95
70
HampelH.MitchellA.BlennowK.FrankR. A.BrettschneiderS.WellerL.MollerH. J. (2004b). Core biological marker candidates of Alzheimer’s disease – perspectives for diagnosis, prediction of outcome and reflection of biological activity.J. Neural Transm.111, 247–272.10.1007/s00702-003-0065-z
71
HampelH.TeipelS. J.FuchsbergerT.AndreasenN.WiltfangJ.OttoM.ShenY.DodelR.DuY.FarlowM.MollerH. J.BlennowK.BuergerK. (2004c). Value of CSF beta-amyloid1-42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.Mol. Psychiatry9, 705–710.
72
HampelH.BurgerK.PruessnerJ. C.ZinkowskiR.DeBernardisJ.KerkmanD.LeinsingerG.EvansA. C.DaviesP.MullerH.-J.TeipelS. J. (2005). Correlation of cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 with rates of hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer disease.Arch. Neurol.62, 770–773.10.1001/archneur.62.5.770
73
HanssonO.ZetterbergH.BuchhaveP.LondosE.BlennowK.MinthonL. (2006). Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study.Lancet Neurol.5, 228–234.10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70355-6
74
HennemanW. J.SluimerJ. D.BarnesJ.van der FlierW. M.SluimerI. C.FoxN. C.ScheltensP.VrenkenH.BarkhofF. (2009). Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease: added value over whole brain volume measures.Neurology72, 999–1007.10.1212/01.wnl.0000344568.09360.31
75
HuangC.EidelbergD.HabeckC.MoellerJ.SvenssonL.TarabulaT.JulinP. (2007). Imaging markers of mild cognitive impairment: multivariate analysis of CBF SPECT.Neurobiol. Aging28, 1062–1069.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.037
76
HulstaertF.BlennowK.IvanoiuA.SchoonderwaldtH. C.RiemenschneiderM.De DeynP. P.BancherC.CrasP.WiltfangJ.MehtaP. D.IqbalK.PottelH.VanmechelenE.VandersticheleH. (1999). Improved discrimination of AD patients using beta-amyloid(1-42) and tau levels in CSF.Neurology52, 1555–1562.
77
IkonomovicM. D.KlunkW. E.AbrahamsonE. E.MathisC. A.PriceJ. C.TsopelasN. D.LoprestiB. J.ZiolkoS.BiW.PaljugW. R.DebnathM. L.HopeC. E.IsanskiB. A.HamiltonR. L.DeKoskyS. T. (2008). Post-mortem correlates of in vivo PiB-PET amyloid imaging in a typical case of Alzheimer’s disease.Brain131, 1630–1645.10.1093/brain/awn016
78
IshiiK.KawachiT.SasakiH.KonoA. K.FukudaT.KojimaY.MoriE. (2005). Voxel-based morphometric comparison between early- and late-onset mild Alzheimer’s disease and assessment of diagnostic performance of z score images.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.26, 333–340.
79
IshiiK.WillochF.MinoshimaS.DrzezgaA.FicaroE. P.CrossD. J.KuhlD. E.SchwaigerM. (2001). Statistical brain mapping of 18F-FDG PET in Alzheimer’s disease: validation of anatomic standardization for atrophied brains.J. Nucl. Med.42, 548–557.
80
IwatsuboT.OdakaA.SuzukiN.MizusawaH.NukinaN.IharaY. (1994). Visualization of A-beta-42(43) and A-beta-40 in senile plaques with end specific A-beta monoclonals: evidence that an initially deposited species as A-beta-42(43).Neuron13, 45–53.10.1016/0896-6273(94)90458-8
81
JackC.PetersenR.GrundmanM.JinS.GamstA. C.WardC. P.SencakovaD.DoodyR. S.ThalL. J. (2008a). Longitudinal MRI findings from the vitamin E and donepezil treatment study for MCI.Neurobiol. Aging29, 1285–1295.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.004
82
JackC. R.Jr.LoweV. J.SenjemM. L.WeigandS. D.KempB. J.ShiungM. M.KnopmanD. S.BoeveB. F.KlunkW. E.MathisC. A.PetersenR. C. (2008b). 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Brain131, 665–680.10.1093/brain/awm336
83
JackC. R.Jr.KnopmanD. S.JagustW. J.ShawL. M.AisenP. S.WeinerM. W.PetersenR. C.TrojanowskiJ. Q. (2010a). Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade.Lancet Neurol.9, 119–128.10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6
84
JackC. R.Jr.WisteH. J.VemuriP.WeigandS. D.SenjemM. L.ZengG.BernsteinM. A.GunterJ. L.PankratzV. S.AisenP. S.WeinerM. W.PetersenR. C.ShawL. M.TrojanowskiJ. Q.KnopmanD. S. (2010b). Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease.Brain133, 3336–3348.10.1093/brain/awq277
85
JackC. R.Jr.LoweV. J.WeigandS. D.WisteH. J.SenjemM. L.KnopmanD. S.ShiungM. M.GunterJ. L.BoeveB. F.KempB. J.WeinerM.PetersenR. C. (2009). Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer’s disease.Brain132, 1355–1365.10.1093/brain/awp062
86
JackC. R.PetersenR. C.XuY.O’BrienP. C.SmithG. E.IvnikR. J.BoeveB. F.TangalosE. G.KokmenE. (2000). Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD.Neurology55, 484–489.
87
JackC. R.PetersenR. C.XuY. C.O’BrienP. C.SmithG. E.IvnikR. J.BoeveB. F.WaringS. C.TangalosE. G.KokmenE. (1999). Prediction of AD aith MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment.Neurology52, 1397–1403.
88
JackC. R.ShiungM. M.GunterJ. L.O’BrienP. C.WeigandS. D.KnopmanD. S.BoeveB. F.IvnikR. J.SmithG. E.ChaR. H.TangalosE. G.PetersenR. C. (2004). Comparison of different MRI brain atrophy rate measures with clinical disease progression in AD.Neurology62, 591–600.
89
JagustW.ThistedR.DevousM. D.Van HeertumR.MaybergH.JobstK.SmithA. D.BorysN. (2001). SPECT perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a clinical-pathologic study.Neurology56, 950–956.
90
JagustW.ZhengL.HarveyD. J.MackW. J.VintersH. V.WeinerM. W.EllisW. G.ZarrowC.MungasD.ReedB. R. (2008). Neuropathological basis of magnetic resonance images in aging and dementia.Ann. Neurol.63, 72–80.10.1002/ana.21296
91
JagustW. J.GitchoA.SunF.KuczynskiB.MungasD.HaanM. (2006). Brain imaging evidence of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease in normal aging.Ann. Neurol.59, 673–681.10.1002/ana.20799
92
JagustW. J.LandauS. M.ShawL. M.TrojanowskiJ. Q.KoeppeR. A.ReimanE. M.FosterN. L.PetersenR. C.WeinerM. W.PriceJ. C.MathisC. A. (2009). Relationships between biomarkers in aging and dementia.Neurology73, 1193–1199.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bc010c
93
KadirA.AlmkvistO.ForsbergA.WallA.EnglerH.LangstromB.NordbergA. (2010). Dynamic changes in PET amyloid and FDG imaging at different stages of Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiol. Aging.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.015. [Epub ahead of print].
94
KapakiE.KilidireasK.ParaskevasG. P.MichalopoulouM.PatsourisE. (2001). Highly increased CSF tau protein and decreased beta-amyloid (1-42) in sporadic CJD: a discrimination from Alzheimer’s disease?J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.71, 401–403.10.1136/jnnp.71.3.401
95
KapakiE. N.ParaskevasG. P.TzerakisN. G.SfagosC.SeretisA.KararizouE.VassilopoulosD. (2007). Cerebrospinal fluid tau, phospho-tau181 and beta-amyloid1-42 in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a discrimination from Alzheimer’s disease.Eur. J. Neurol.14, 168–173.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01593.x
96
KarasG. B.BurtonE. J.RomboutsS. A. R. B.van SchijndelR. A.O’BrienJ. T.ScheltensP. H.McKeithI. G.WilliamsD.BallardC.BarkhofF. (2003). A comprehensive study of gray metter loss in patients with Alzheimer’s disease using optimized voxel-based morphometry.Neuroimage18, 895–907.10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00041-7
97
KarasG. B.ScheltensP.RomboutsS. A. R. B.VisserP. J.van SchijndelR. A.FoxN. C.BarkhofF. (2004). Global and local gray matter loss in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.Neuroimage23, 708–716.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.006
98
KesterM. I.BlankensteinM. A.BouwmanF. H.van ElkE. J.ScheltensP.van der FlierW. M. (2009). CSF biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease and controls: associations with APOE genotype are modified by age.J. Alzheimers Dis.16, 601–607.
99
KlunkW. E. (1998). Biological markers of Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiol. Aging19, 145–147.10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00013-X
100
KlunkW. E.EnglerH.NordbergA.WangY.BlomqvistG.HoltD. P.BergströmM.SavitchevaI.HuangG.EstradaS. (2004). Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh compound-B.Ann. Neurol.55, 306–319.10.1002/ana.20009
101
KlunkW. E.WangY.HuangG. F.DebnathM. L.HoltD. P.ShaoL.HamiltonR. L.IkonomovicM. D.DeKoskyS. T.MathisC. A. (2003). The binding of 2-(4′-methylaminophenyl)benzothiazole to postmortem brain homogenates is dominated by the amyloid component.J. Neurosci.23, 2086–2092.
102
KnopmanD. S.DeKoskyS. T.CummingsJ. L.ChuiH.Corey-BloomJ.RelkinN.SmallG. W.MillerB.StevensJ. C. (2001). Practice parameter: diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.Neurology56, 1143–1153.
103
KoeppeR. A.GilmanS.JoshiA.LiuS.LittleR.JunckL.HeumannM.FreyK. A.AlbinR. L. (2005). 11C-DTBZ and 18F-FDG PET measures in differentiating dementias.J. Nucl. Med.46, 936–944.
104
KogureD.MatsudaH.OhnishiT.KumihiroT.UnoM.TakasakiM. (2000). Longitudinal evaluation of early Alzheimer disease using brain perfusion SPECT.J. Nucl. Med.41, 1155–1162.
105
KoivunenJ.ScheininN.VirtaJ. R.AaltoS.VahlbergT.NagrenK.HelinS.ParkkolaR.ViitanenM.RinneJ. O. (2011). Amyloid PET imaging in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a 2-year follow-up study.Neurology76, 1085–1090.10.1212/WNL.0b013e318212015e
106
KoopmanK.Le BastardN.MartinJ. J.NagelsG.De DeynP. P.EngelborghsS. (2009). Improved discrimination of autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from non-AD dementias using CSF P-tau(181P).Neurochem. Int.55, 214–218.10.1016/j.neuint.2009.02.017
107
KudoY.OkamuraN.FurumotoS.TashiroM.FurukawaK.MaruyamaM.ItohM.IwataR.YanaiK.AraiH. (2007). 2-(2-[2-Dimethylaminothiazol-5-yl]ethenyl)-6-(2-[fluoro]ethoxy) benzoxazole: a novel PET agent for in vivo detection of dense amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease patients.J. Nucl. Med.48, 553–561.10.2967/jnumed.106.037556
108
KurzA.RiemenschneiderM.BuchK.WillochF.BartensteinP.MullerU.GuderW. (1998). Tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid is significantly increased at the earliest clinical stage of Alzheimer’s disease.Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord.12, 372–377.10.1097/00002093-199812000-00020
109
LeeV. M. Y. (1996). Regulation of tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.777, 107–113.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb34408.x
110
LeinonenV.AlafuzoffI.AaltoS.SuotunenT.SavolainenS.NagrenK.TapiolaT.PirttilaT.RinneJ.JaaskelainenJ. E.SoininenH.RinneJ. O. (2008). Assessment of beta-amyloid in a frontal cortical brain biopsy specimen and by positron emission tomography with carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh compound B.Arch. Neurol.65, 1304–1309.10.1001/archneur.65.10.noc80013
111
LewczukP.EsselmannH.OttoM.MalerJ. M.HenkelA. W.HenkelM. K.EikenbergO.AntzC.KrauseW.-R.ReulbachU. (2004). Neurochemical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia by CSF AB42, AB42/AB40 ratio and total tau.Neurobiol. Aging25, 273–281.10.1016/S0197-4580(04)80914-X
112
LimA.TsuangD.KukullW.NochlinD.LeverenaJ.McCormickW.BowenJ.TeriL.ThompsonJ.PeskindE. R.RaskindM.LarsonE. B. (1999). Clinico-neuropathological correlation of Alzheimer’s disease in a community-based case series.J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.47, 564–569.
113
MathisC. A.BacskaiB. J.KajdaszS. T.McLellanM. E.FroschM. P.HymanB. T.HoltD. P.WangY.HuangG. F.DebnathM. L.KlunkW. E. (2002). A lipophilic thioflavin-T derivative for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of amyloid in brain.Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.12, 295–298.10.1016/S0960-894X(01)00734-X
114
MathisC. A.LoprestiB. J.KlunkW. E. (2007). Impact of amyloid imaging on drug development in Alzheimer’s disease.Nucl. Med. Biol.34, 809–822.10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.06.015
115
MathisC. A.WangY.HoltD. P.HuangG. F.DebnathM. L.KlunkW. E. (2003). Synthesis and evaluation of 11C-labeled 6-substituted 2-arylbenzothiazoles as amyloid imaging agents.J. Med. Chem.46, 2740–2754.10.1021/jm030026b
116
MattssonN.ZetterbergH.HanssonO.AndreasenN.ParnettiL.JonssonM.HerukkaS. K.van der FlierW. M.BlankensteinM. A.EwersM.RichK.KaiserE.VerbeekM.TsolakiM.MulugetaE.RosenE.AarslandD.VisserP. J.SchroderJ.MarcussonJ.de LeonM.HampelH.ScheltensP.PirttilaT.WallinA.JonhagenM. E.MinthonL.WinbladB.BlennowK. (2009). CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.JAMA302, 385–393.10.1001/jama.2009.1064
117
MayeuxR.SaundersA. M.SheaS.MirraS.EvansD.RosesA. D.HymanB. T.CrainB.TangM.PhelpsC. H. (1998). Utility of the apolipoprotein E genotype in the diagnosis of Alzheiemer’s disease.N. Engl. J. Med.338, 506–511.10.1056/NEJM199802193380804
118
McKhannG.DrachmanD. A.FolsteinM. F.KatzmanR.PriceD. L.StadlanE. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease.Neurology34, 939–944.
119
McKhannG. M.KnopmanD. S.ChertkowH.HymanB. T.JackC. R.Jr.KawasC. H.KlunkW. E.KoroshetzW. J.ManlyJ. J.MayeuxR.MohsR. C.MorrisJ. C.RossorM. N.ScheltensP.CarilloM. C.ThiesB.WeintraubS.PhelpsC. H. (2011). The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association workgroup.Alzheimers Dement.7, 263–269.10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
120
MinoshimaS.FosterN. L.SimaA. A.FrevK. A.AlbinR. L.KuhlD. E. (2001). Alzheimer’s disease versus dementia with Lewy bodies: cerebral metabolic distinction with autopsy confirmation.Ann. Neurol.50, 358–365.10.1002/ana.1133
121
MinoshimaS.FreyK. A.KoeppeR. A.FosterN. L.KuhlD. E. (1995). A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET.J. Nucl. Med.36, 1238–1248.
122
MinoshimaS.GiordaniB.BerentS.FreyK. A.FosterN. L.KuhlD. E. (1997). Metabolic reduction in the posterior congulare cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.42, 85–94.10.1002/ana.410420114
123
MintunM. A.LarossaG. N.ShelineY. I.DencaC. S.LeeS. Y.MachR. H.KlunkW. E.MathisC. A.DeKoskyS. T.MorrisJ. C. (2006). [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.Neurology67, 446–452.10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4
124
MitchellA. J. (2009). CSF phosphorylated tau in the diagnosis and prognosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of 51 studies.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.80, 966–975.10.1136/jnnp.2008.167791
125
MorminoE. C.KluthJ. T.MadisonC. M.RabinoviciG. D.BakerS. L.MillerB. L.KoeppeR. A.MathisC. A.WeinerM. W.JagustW. J. (2009). Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated beta-amyloid deposition in elderly subjects.Brain132, 1310–1323.10.1093/brain/awn320
126
MorrisJ. C.RoeC. M.GrantE. A.HeadD.StorandtM.GoateA.FaganA. M.HoltzmanD. M.MintunM. A. (2009). Pittsburgh compound B imaging and prediction of progression from cognitive normality to symptomatic Alzheimer disease.Arch. Neurol.66, 1469–1475.10.1001/archneurol.2009.269
127
MorrisJ. C.RoeC. M.XiongC.FaganA. M.GoateA. M.HoltzmanD. M.MintunM. A. (2010). APOE predicts amyloid-beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging.Ann. Neurol.67, 122–131.10.1002/ana.21843
128
MortimerJ. A.GoscheK. M.RileyK. P.MarkesberyW. R.SnowdonD. A. (2004). Delayed recall, hippocampal volume and Alzheimer neuropathology.Neurology62, 428–432.
129
MosconiL.BrysM.SwitalskiR.MisturR.GlodzikL.PirragliaE.TsuiW.De SantiS.de LeonM. J. (2007). Maternal family history of Alzheimer’s disease predisposes to reduced brain glucose metabolism.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 19067–19072.10.1073/pnas.0705036104
130
MosconiL.De SantiS.LiJ.TsuiW. H.LiY.BoppanaM.LaskaE.RusinekH.de LeonM. J. (2008). Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging.Neurobiol. Aging29, 676–692.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.12.008
131
MosconiL.MisturR.SwitalskiR.BrysM.GlodzikL.RichK.PirragliaE.TsuiW.De SantiS.de LeonM. J. (2009). Declining brain glucose metabolism in normal individuals with a maternal history of Alzheimer disease.Neurology72, 513–520.10.1212/01.wnl.0000333247.51383.43
132
MosconiL.TsuiE. H.De SantiS.LiJ.RusinekH.ConvitA.LiY.BoppanaM.de LeonM. J. (2005). Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD. Automated FDG-PET image analysis.Neurology64, 1860–1867.10.1212/01.WNL.0000163856.13524.08
133
MotterR.Vigo-PelfreyC.KholodenkoD.BarbourR.Johnson-WoodK.GalaskoD.ChangL.MillerB.ClarkC.GreenR. (1995). Reduction of beta-amyloid peptide42 in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.38, 643–648.10.1002/ana.410380413
134
Mukaetova-LadinskaE. B.MonteithR.PerryE. K. (2010). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for dementia with Lewy bodies.Int. J. Alzheimers Dis.2010, 536538.
135
MulugetaE.LondosE.BallardC.AlvesG.ZetterbergH.BlennowK.SkogsethR.MinthonL.AarslandD. (2010). CSF amyloid {beta}38 as a novel diagnostic marker for dementia with Lewy bodies.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.82, 160–164.10.1136/jnnp.2009.199398
136
O’BrienJ. T.PalingS.BarberR.WilliamsE. D.BallardC.McKeithI. G.GholkarA.CrumW. R.RossorM. N.FoxN. C. (2001). Progressive brain atrophy on serial MRI in dementia with Lewy bodies, AD, and vascular dementia.Neurology56, 1386–1388.
137
OkelloA.KoivunenJ.EdisonP.ArcherH. A.TurkheimerF. E.NagrenK.BullockR.WalkerZ.KennedyA.FoxN. C.RossorM. N.RinneJ. O.BrooksD. J. (2009). Conversion of amyloid positive and negative MCI to AD over 3 years: an 11C-PIB PET study.Neurology73, 754–760.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b23564
138
PanegyresP. K.RogersJ. M.McCarthyM.CampbellA.WuJ. S. (2009). Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis of early-onset dementia: a prospective, community-based study.BMC Neurol.9, 41.10.1186/1471-2377-9-41
139
PatwardhanM. B.McCroryD. C.MatcharD. B.SamsaG. P.RutschmannO. T. (2004). Alzheimer disease: operating characteristics of PET-a meta-analysis.Radiology231, 73–80.10.1148/radiol.2311021620
140
PennanenC.KivipeltoM.TuomainenS.HartikainenP.HanninenT.LaaksoM. P.HallikainenV.VanhanenM.NissinenA.HelkalaE.-L.VainioP.VanninenR.PartanenK.SoininenH. (2004). Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in mild cognitive impairment and early AD.Neurobiol. Aging25, 303–310.10.1016/S0197-4580(03)00084-8
141
PeskindE. R.LiG.ShoferJ.QuinnJ. F.KayeJ. A.ClarkC. M.FarlowM. R.DeCarliC.RaskindM. A.SchellenbergG. D.LeeV. M.GalaskoD. R. (2006). Age and apolipoprotein E*4 allele effects on cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid 42 in adults with normal cognition.Arch. Neurol.63, 936–939.10.1001/archneur.63.7.936
142
PetersenR. C.RobertsR. O.KnopmanD. S.BoeveB. F.GedaY. E.IvnikR. J.SmithG. E.JackC. R.Jr. (2009). Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later.Arch. Neurol.66, 1447–1455.10.1001/archneurol.2009.266
143
PetrieE. C.CrossD. J.GalaskoD.SchellenbergG. D.RaskindM. A.PeskindE. R.MinoshimaS. (2009). Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer changes: convergent cerebrospinal fluid biomarker and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography findings.Arch. Neurol.66, 632–637.10.1001/archneurol.2009.59
144
PikeK. E.SavageG.VillemagneV. L.NgS.MossS. A.MaruffP.MathisC. A.KlunkW. E.MastersC. L.RoweC. C. (2007). Beta-amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.Brain130, 2837–2844.10.1093/brain/awm238
145
PriceJ. L.MorrisJ. C. (1999). Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease.Ann. Neurol.45, 358–368.10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::AID-ANA12>3.0.CO;2-X
146
QuerfurthH. W.LaFerlaF. M. (2010). Alzheimer’s disease.N. Engl. J. Med.362, 329–344.10.1056/NEJMra0909142
147
RajiC. A.LeeC.LopezO. L.TsayJ.BoardmanJ. F.SchwartzE. D.BartynskiW. S.HefzyH. M.GachH. M.DaiW.BeckerJ. T. (2010). Initial experience in using continuous arterial spin-labeled MR imaging for early detection of Alzheimer disease.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.31, 847–855.10.3174/ajnr.A1955
148
ReimanE. M.CaselliR. J.ChenK.AlexanderG. E.BandyD.FrostJ. (2001). Declining brain activity in cognitively normal apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 heterozygotes: a foundation for using positron emission tomography to efficiently test treatments to prevent Alzheimer’s disease.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.98, 3334–3339.10.1073/pnas.061509598
149
ReimanE. M.CaselliR. J.YunL. S.ChenK.BandyD.MinoshimaS.ThibodeauS. N.OsborneD. (1996). Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer’s disease in persons homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele for apolipoprotein E.N. Engl. J. Med.334, 752–758.10.1056/NEJM199603213341202
150
ReimanE. M.ChenK.AlexanderG. E.CaselliR. J.BandyD.OsborneD.SaundersA. M.HardyJ. (2004). Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's dementia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101, 284–289.10.1073/pnas.2635903100
151
ReimanE. M.ChenK.AlexanderG. E.CaselliR. J.BandyD.OsborneD.SaundersA. M.HardyJ. (2005). Correlations between apolipoprotein E epsilon4 gene dose and brain-imaging measurements of regional hypometabolism.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 8299–8302.10.1073/pnas.0500579102
152
RentzD. M.LocascioJ. J.BeckerJ. A.MoranE. K.EngE.BucknerR. L.SperlingR. A.JohnsonK. A. (2010). Cognition, reserve, and amyloid deposition in normal aging.Ann. Neurol.67, 353–364.10.1001/archneurol.2010.19
153
RidhaB. H.AndersonV. M.BarnesJ.BoyesR. G.PriceS. L.RossorM. N.WhitwellJ. L.JenkinsL.BlackR. S.GrundmanM.FoxN. C. (2008). Volumetric MRI and cognitive measures in Alzheimer disease: comparison of markers of progression.J. Neurol.255, 567–574.10.1007/s00415-008-0750-9
154
RiemenschneiderM.WagenpfeilS.DiehlJ.LautenschlagerN.ThemlT.HeldmannB.DrzezgaA.JahnT.ForstlH.KurzA. (2002). Tau and A-beta-42 protein in CSF of patients with frontotemporal degeneration.Neurology58, 1622–1628.
155
RiemenschneiderM.WagenpfeilS.VandersticheleH.OttoM.WiltfangJ.KretzschmarH.VanmechelenE.ForstlH.KurzA. (2003). Phospho-tau/total tau ratio in cerebrospinal fluid discriminates Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from other dementias.Mol. Psychiatry8, 343–347.10.1038/sj.mp.4001220
156
RoweC. C.AckermanU.BrowneW.MulliganR.PikeK. L.O’KeefeG.Tochon-DanguyH.ChanG.BerlangieriS. U.JonesG.Dickinson-RoweK. L.KungH. P.ZhangW.KungM. P.SkovronskyD.DyrksT.HollG.KrauseS.FriebeM.LehmanL.LindemannS.DinkelborgL. M.MastersC. L.VillemagneV. L. (2008). Imaging of amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism.Lancet Neurol.7, 129–135.10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2
157
RoweC. C.NgS.AckermannU.GongS. J.PikeK.SavageG.CowieT. F.DickinsonK. L.MaruffP.DarbyD. (2007). Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia.Neurology68, 1718–1725.10.1212/01.wnl.0000261919.22630.ea
158
ScheininN. M.AaltoS.KoikkalainenJ.LotjonenJ.KarraschM.KemppainenN.ViitanenM.NagrenK.HelinS.ScheininM.RinneJ. O. (2009). Follow-up of [11C]PIB uptake and brain volume in patients with Alzheimer disease and controls.Neurology73, 1186–1192.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bacf1b
159
SchoonenboomN. S. M.PijnenburgY. A. L.MulerC.RossoS. M.Van ElkE. J.Van KampG. J.Van SwietenJ. C.ScheltensP. (2004). Amyloid beta (1-42) and phosphorylated tau in CSF as markers for early-onset Alzheimer disease.Neurology62, 1580–1584.
160
SchottJ. M.BartlettJ. W.FoxN. C.BarnesJ. (2010). Increased brain atrophy rates in cognitively normal older adults with low cerebrospinal fluid A beta1-42.Ann. Neurol.68, 825–834.10.1002/ana.22315
161
SchottJ. M.CrutchS. J.FrostC.WarringtonE. K.RossorM. N.FoxN. C. (2008). Neuropsychological correlates of whole brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuropsychologia46, 1732–1737.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.015
162
ShawL. M.VandersticheleH.Knapik-CzajkaM.ClarkC. M.AisenP. S.PetersenR. C.BlennowK.SoaresH.SimonA.LewczukP.DeanR.SiemersE.PotterW.LeeV. M.TrojanowskiJ. Q. (2009). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative subjects.Ann. Neurol.65, 403–413.10.1002/ana.21610
163
ShinJ.LeeS. Y.KimS. H.KimY. B.ChoS. J. (2008). Multitracer PET imaging of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease.Neuroimage43, 236–244.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.022
164
ShojiM.MatsubaraE.KanaiM.WatanabeM.NakamuraT.TomidokoroY.ShizukaM.WakabayashiK.IgetaY.IkedaY.MizushimaK.AmariM.IshiguroK.KawarabayasiT.HarigayaY.OkamotoK.HiraiS. (1998). Combination assay of CSF tau, A beta 1-40 and A beta 1-42(43) as a biochemical marker of Alzheimer disease.J. Neurol. Sci.158, 134–140.10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00122-1
165
SilvermanD. H.SmallG. W.ChangC. Y.LuC. S.DeAburtoK.ChenW.CzerninJ.RapoportS. I.PetriniP.AlexanderG. E. (2001). Positron emission tomography in evaluation of dementia: regional brain metabolism and long-term outcome.JAMA286, 2120–2127.10.1001/jama.286.5.572
166
SluimerJ. D.van der FlierW. M.KarasG. B.FoxN. C.ScheltensP.BarkhofF.VrenkenH. (2008a). Whole-brain atrophy rate and cognitive decline: longitudinal MR study of memory clinic patients.Radiology248, 590–598.10.1148/radiol.2482070938
167
SluimerJ. D.VrenkenH.BlankensteinM. A.FoxN. C.ScheltensP.BarkhofF.van der FlierW. M. (2008b). Whole-brain atrophy rate in Alzheimer disease: identifying fast progressors.Neurology70, 1836–1841.10.1212/01.wnl.0000311446.61861.e3
168
SmallG. W.KepeV.ErcoliL. M.SiddarthP.BookheimerS. Y.MillerK. J.LavretskyH.BurggrenA. C.ColeG. M.VintersH. V.ThompsonP. M. (2006). PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment.N. Engl. J. Med.355, 2652–2663.10.1056/NEJMoa054625
169
SperlingR. A.AisenP. S.BeckettL. A.BennettD. A.CraftS.FaganA. M.IwatsuboT.JackC. R.KayeJ.MontineT. J.ParkD. C.ReimanE. M.RoweC. C.SiemersE.SternY.YaffeK.CarrilloM. C.ThiesB.Morrison-BogoradM.WagsterM. V.PhelpsC. H. (2011). Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association workgroup.Alzheimers Dement.7, 280–292.10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003
170
SpulberG.NiskanenE.MacdonaldS.SmiloviciO.ChenK.ReimanE. M.JauhiainenA. M.HallikainenM.TervoS.WahlundL. O.VanninenR.KivipeltoM.SoininenH. (2008). Whole brain atrophy rate predicts progression from MCI to Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiol. Aging31, 1601–1605.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.08.018
171
StomrudE.HanssonO.BlennowK.MinthonL.LondosE. (2007). Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers predict decline in subjective cognitive function over 3 years in healthy elderly.Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord.24, 118–124.10.1159/000105017
172
StornadtM.MintunM. A.HeadD.MorrisJ. C. (2009). Cognitive decline and brain volume loss as signatures of cerebral amyloid-beat peptide deposition identified with Pittsburgh compound B: cognitive decline associated with Abeta deposition.Arch. Neurol.66, 1476–1481.10.1001/archneurol.2009.272
173
StrozykD.BlennowK.WhiteL. R.LaunerL. J. (2003). CSF Abeta 42 levels correlate with amyloid-neuropathology in a population-based autopsy study.Neurology60, 652–656.
174
SunderlandT.LinkerG.MirzaN.PutnamK. T.FriedmanD. L.KimmelL. H.BergesonJ.ManettiG. J.ZimmermannM.TangB.BartkoJ. J.CohenR. M. (2003). Decreased beta-amyloid1-42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease.JAMA289, 2094–2103.10.1001/jama.289.16.2094
175
SunderlandT.WolozinB.GalaskoD.LevyJ.DukoffR.BahroM.LasserR.MotterR.LehtimakiT.SeubertP. (1999). Longitudinal stability of CSF tau levels in Alzheimer patients.Biol. Psychiatry46, 750–755.10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00143-2
176
TapiolaT.AlafuzoffI.HerukkaS. K.ParkkinenL.HartikainenP.SoininenH.PirttilaT. (2009). Cerebrospinal fluid {beta}-amyloid 42 and tau proteins as biomarkers of Alzheimer-type pathologic changes in the brain.Arch. Neurol.66, 382–389.10.1001/archneurol.2008.596
177
TeipelS. J.BornC.EwersM.BokdeA. L. W.ReiserM. F.MollerH.-J.HampelH. (2007). Multivariate deformation based analysis of brain atrophy to predict Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment.Neuroimage28, 3–24.
178
TestaC.LaaksoM. P.SabattoliF.RossiR.BeltramelloA.SoininenH.FrisoniG. B. (2004). A comparison between the accuracy of voxel-based morphometry and hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer’s disease.J. Magn. Reson. Imaging19, 274–282.10.1002/jmri.20001
179
ThompsonP. M.MegaM. S.WoodsR. P.ZoumalanC. I.LindschieldC. J.BlantonR. E.MoussaiJ.HolmesC. J.CummingsJ. L.TogaA. W. (2001). Cortical change in Alzheimer’s disease detected with a disease-specific population-based brain atlas.Cereb. Cortex11, 1–16.10.1093/cercor/11.1.1
180
TokudaT.QureshiM. M.ArdahM. T.VargheseS.ShehabS. A.KasaiT.IshigamiN.TamaokaA.NakagawaM.El-AgnafO. M. (2010). Detection of elevated levels of alpha-synuclein oligomers in CSF from patients with Parkinson disease.Neurology75, 1766–1772.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fd613b
181
TolboomN.van der FlierW. M.YaqubM.BoellaardR.VerweyN. A.BlankensteinM. A.WindhorstA. D.ScheltensP.LammertsmaA. A.van BerckelB. N. (2009). Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid markers to 11C-PiB and 18F-FDDNP binding.J. Nucl. Med.50, 1464–1470.10.2967/jnumed.108.056499
182
VemuriP.JackC. R.Jr. (2010). Role of structural MRI in Alzheimer’s disease.Alzheimers Res Ther2, 23.10.1186/alzrt47
183
VemuriP.WisteH. J.WeigandS. D.KnopmanD. S.ShawL. M.TrojanowskiJ. Q.AisenP. S.WeinerM.PetersenR. C.JackC. R.Jr. (2010a). Effect of apolipoprotein E on biomarkers of amyloid load and neuronal pathology in Alzheimer disease.Ann. Neurol.67, 308–316.
184
VemuriP.WisteH. J.WeigandS. D.KnopmanD. S.TrojanowskiJ. Q.ShawL. M.BernsteinM. A.AisenP. S.WeinerM.PetersenR. C.JackC. R.Jr. (2010b). Serial MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal aging, MCI, and AD.Neurology75, 143–151.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e7ca82
185
VerhoeffN. P.WilsonA. A.TakeshitaS.TropL.HusseyD.SinghK.KungH. F.KungM. P.HouleS. (2004). In-vivo imaging of Alzheimer disease beta-amyloid with [11C] SB-13 PET.Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry12, 584–595.10.1176/appi.ajgp.12.6.584
186
Vigo-PelfreyC.SeubertP.BarbourR.BlomquistC.LeeM.LeeD.CoriaF.ChangL.MillerB.LieberburgI. (1995). Elevation of microtubule-associated protein tau in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease.Neurology45, 788–793.
187
VillemagneV. L.PikeK. E.ChetelatG.EllisK. A.MulliganR. S.BourgeatP.AckermannU.JonesG.SzoekeC.SalvadoO.MartinsR.O’KeefeG.MathisC. A.KlunkW. E.AmesD.MastersC. L.RoweC. C. (2011). Longitudinal assessment of Abeta and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease.Ann. Neurol.69, 181–192.10.1002/ana.22248
188
VisserP. J.ScheltensP.VerheyF. R. J.SchmandB.LaunerL. J.JollesJ.JonkerC. (1999). Medial temporal lobe atrophy and memory dysfunction as predictors for dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment.J. Neurol.246, 477–485.10.1007/s004150050387
189
VisserP. J.VerheyF.KnolD. L.ScheltensP.WahlundL. O.Freund-LeviY.TsolakiM.MinthonL.WallinA. K.HampelH.BurgerK.PirttilaT.SoininenH.RikkertM. O.VerbeekM. M.SpiruL.BlennowK. (2009). Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study.Lancet Neurol.8, 619–627.10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70139-5
190
VisserP. J.VerheyF. R. J.HofmanP. A. M.ScheltensP.JollesJ. (2002). Medial temporal lobe atrophy predicts Alzheimer’s disease in patients with minor cognitive impairment.J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry72, 491–497.
191
WallinA. K.BlennowK.ZetterbergH.LondosE.MinthonL.HanssonO. (2010). CSF biomarkers predict a more malignant outcome in Alzheimer disease.Neurology74, 1531–1537.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181dd4dd8
192
WhitwellJ. L.PrzybelskiS. A.WeigandS. D.KnopmanD.BoeveB. F.PetersenR.JackC. (2007). 3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease.Brain130, 1777–1786.10.1093/brain/awl388
193
WhitwellJ. L.ShiungM. M.PrzybelskiS. A.WeigandS. D.KnopmanD. S.BoeveB. F.PetersenR. C.JackC. R.Jr. (2008). MRI patterns of atrophy associated with progression to AD in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Neurology70, 512–520.10.1212/01.wnl.0000280575.77437.a2
194
WolkD. A.PriceJ. C.SaxtonJ.SnitzB.JamesJ. A.LopezO. L.AizensteinH. J.WeissfeldL. A.MathisC. A.KlunkW.DekoskyS. T. (2009). Amyloid imaging in mild cognitive impairment subtypes.Ann. Neurol.65, 557–568.10.1002/ana.21598
195
YuanY.GuZ. X.WeiW. S. (2009). Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography, single-photon emission tomography, and structural MR imaging for prediction of rapid conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.30, 404–410.10.3174/ajnr.A1663
Summary
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, biomarker, cerebrospinal fluid, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography
Citation
Riverol M and López OL (2011) Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neur. 2:46. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00046
Received
23 December 2010
Accepted
02 July 2011
Published
14 July 2011
Volume
2 - 2011
Edited by
Lea T. Grinberg, University of California, USA
Reviewed by
Miguel Pappolla, Medical University of South Carolina, USA; Michael Ewers, University of California San Francisco and VA Medical Center San Francisco, USA
Copyright
© 2011 Riverol and López.
This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
*Correspondence: Oscar L. López, Neuropsychology Research Program, 830 Oxford Building, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. e-mail: lopezol@upmc.edu
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Dementia, a specialty of Frontiers in Neurology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.