Abstract
Background: The hexanucleotide repeat expansion in intron 1 of the C9orf72 gene is recognized as the most common genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). There are overlapping clinical and pathological characteristics between FTD and Parkinsonism syndrome, and some FTD patients may present with Parkinsonism. The aim of this study was to analyze the hexanucleotide repeat numbers of C9orf72 gene in a mixed Taiwanese cohort with FTD, Parkinsonism syndrome, Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Alzheimer’s dementia (AD).
Method: The number of hexanucleotide repeats was estimated in a total of 482 patients with mixed neurodegenerative disorders and 485 control subjects, using a two-step repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping strategy. The individual groups of patients included patients with Parkinsonism syndrome (n = 95), familial PD (n = 109), young-onset PD (n = 201), FTD (n = 9), sporadic AD (n = 61), and early-onset AD (n = 7).
Results: We did not identify any pathogenic repeats (>30 repeats) of C9orf72 in either the patients or control subjects. However, we found one young-onset PD patient and one control subject that each had an intermediate number of repeats (25 and 21 repeats, respectively). The clinical phenotype of the young-onset PD in this patient was similar to typical idiopathic PD without additional features, and the patient responded well to levodopa treatment.
Conclusion: The repeat expansion in C9orf72 is not a common cause of PD, Parkinsonism syndrome, or dementia in our population. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical and biological significance of intermediate repeats in C9orf72.
Introduction
A massive expansion of the GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in the intron between non-coding exons 1a and 1b of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene was recently found to be a major genetic cause of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (1, 2). Patients who carry the repeat expansion have an earlier onset, shorter survival, and familial aggregation of dementia or other neurodegenerative disorders than patients with normal repeat number of C9orf72 (3). In addition to FTD and ALS, other features in patients carrying the C9orf72 mutation can include isolated Parkinsonian movement disorder, memory impairment, and signs of cerebellar dysfunction (4). These symptoms tend to accumulate and phenotypes may converge with disease progression. Most patients eventually develop some behavioral abnormalities, as well as language and motor disabilities (5, 6).
Recently, a number of studies have found that Parkinsonism may precede, coincide, or follow the behavioral or language-predominant variant of FTD. FTD with Parkinsonism is part of a growing spectrum of the dementia–Parkinsonism continuum (7–9). The clinical phenotypes include the Parkinsonism syndrome of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), diffuse Lewy body dementia (DLBD), and typical Parkinson’s disease (PD) (10). The pathological markers of these phenotypes include TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), phosphorylated tau, and tau-negative but ubiquitin-positive neuronal inclusions (6, 11). Therefore, given the clinical and pathological overlaps between FTD, Parkinsonism syndrome, PD, and Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), the aim of this study was to determine whether the abnormal C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions found in FTD patients is also associated with these other neurodegenerative disorders in a Taiwanese population.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
A total of 482 patients with mixed neurodegenerative disorders and 485 ethnicity matched control subjects were enrolled in the study. The individual groups included patients with Parkinsonism syndrome (n = 95), familial PD (n = 109), young-onset PD (age at onset <50 years, n = 201), FTD (n = 9), sporadic late-onset AD (n = 61), and early-onset AD (age at onset <50 years, n = 7). Mutations in the a-synuclein, Parkin, PINK1, DJ-1, LRRK2, SCA2, SCA3, ATP13A2, and HTRA2 genes were excluded in all young-onset PD patients (12–16).
Patients with PD were diagnosed using the UK brain bank diagnosis criteria (17). Patients with FTD were diagnosed using standard criteria by the Work Group on FTD and Pick’s Disease (18). AD patients were diagnosed by the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (19). Unrelated adult volunteers without neurological disease were recruited as controls from the community and from our hospital. Informed consent was given by all study participants, and the study was approved by the institutional ethics board committees of National Taiwan University Hospital.
Genetic analysis
DNA was extracted from venous blood using standard protocols (12). The size of the hexanucleotide repeats in the C9orf72 alleles was detected using a two-step repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction-based genotyping strategy, as previously described (1).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation. Differences in the distributions of repeat number between the individual patient groups and controls were tested using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test and significance was set at p = 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA, version 8.0.
Results
The demographic data of all tested subjects are summarized in Table 1. We used a previously suggested cutoff (>30 repeats) to distinguish the pathogenic expansion from the normal allele (2). We did not detect any pathological repeat expansions of C9orf72 in either patients or control subjects.
Table 1
| Subject group | Patient number (male/female) | Current age (years) | Onset age (years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parkinsonism syndrome | 95 (53∕42) | 69.1 ± 13.3 | 59.5 ± 13.6 |
|  MSA | 51 (26∕25) | 69.5 ± 12.7 | 60.1 ± 12.5 |
|  PSP | 14 (9∕5) | 69.1 ± 12.9 | 60.2 ± 12.6 |
|  CBS | 2 (2∕0) | 68.9 ± 13.3 | 57.6 ± 13.8 |
|  PDD | 17 (10∕7) | 69.6 ± 13.1 | 60.2 ± 12.7 |
|  DLBD | 3 (2∕1) | 69.9 ± 12.3 | 59.1 ± 12.8 |
|  Parkinsonism with dystonia | 6 (3∕3) | 34.3 ± 13.6 | 18.7 ± 12.1 |
|  Parkinsonism with FTD | 2 (1∕1) | 69.5 ± 7.5 | 65.3 ± 11.5 |
| Familial PD | 109 (57∕52) | 66.5 ± 12.2 | 55.6 ± 13.4 |
| Young-onset PD | 201 (103∕98) | 54.3 ± 7.6 | 42.5 ± 5.2 |
| Dementia | 77 (29∕48) | 58.1 ± 11.4 | 55.0 ± 4.5 |
|  FTD | 9 (4∕5) | 58.0 ± 13.9 | 53.9 ± 7.8 |
|  AD | 61 (20∕41) | 64.1 ± 4.5 | 55.0 ± 4.5 |
|  Early-onset AD | 7 (6∕1) | 50.6 ± 4.2 | 46.7 ± 3.2 |
| Control subjects | 485 (233∕252) | 60.6 ± 11.9 | N.A. |
Demographic data of the enrolled subjects in each disease group.
The data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
MSA, multiple system atrophy; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; CBS, corticobasal syndrome; PDD, Parkinson’s disease with dementia; DLBD, dementia with Lewy bodies; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; PD, Parkinson’s disease; AD, Alzheimer’s dementia; N.A., not applicable
The range of repeat expansions detected in our participants was 2–25 units, and the most frequent repeat number was 2 repeats, followed by 6, 7, and 5 repeats. Notably, we found one young-onset PD patient who had an intermediate number of 25 repeats, and one control subject who harbored 21 repeats (Table 2). The clinical phenotype of the young-onset PD in this patient was similar to typical idiopathic PD without additional features, and the patient responded well to levodopa treatment. The distribution of the estimated repeat numbers for each disease group compared to control subjects is presented in Figure 1.
Table 2
| C9orf72 (GGGGCC) repeat number | Parkinsonism syndrome (n = 190 alleles) n (%) | Familial PD (n = 218 alleles) n (%) | Young-onset PD (n = 402 alleles) n (%) | Dementia (n = 154 alleles) n (%) | Control subjects (n = 970 alleles) n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 78 (41.1) | 81 (37.2) | 165 (41.0) | 52 (33.8) | 416 (42.9) |
| 3 | 8 (4.2) | 39 (17.9) | 13 (3.2) | 26 (16.9) | 98 (10.1) |
| 4 | 6 (3.1) | 2 (0.9) | 0 | 12 (7.8) | 27 (2.8) |
| 5 | 12 (6.3) | 17 (7.8) | 41 (10.2) | 20 (13.0) | 79 (8.2) |
| 6 | 27 (14.2) | 31 (14.2) | 59 (14.6) | 26 (16.9) | 98 (10.1) |
| 7 | 47 (24.7) | 42 (19.2) | 100 (24.9) | 10 (6.5) | 200 (20.6) |
| 8 | 2 (1.1) | 2 (0.9) | 6 (1.5) | 4 (2.6) | 12 (1.2) |
| 9 | 2 (1.1) | 2 (0.9) | 10 (2.5) | 1 (0.6) | 12 (1.2) |
| 10 | 4 (2.1) | 1 (0.5) | 6 (1.5) | 2 (1.3) | 13 (1.4) |
| 11 | 2 (1.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (0.6) |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (0.4) |
| 13 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.1) |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.2) |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.1) |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.6) | 0 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.1)a |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.3)a | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Distribution of C9orf72 (GGGGCC) repeat numbers in each disease group and control subjects.
The data are shown as number (percentage); PD, Parkinson’s disease.
aIntermediate repeats (20–29 repeats).
Figure 1
Discussion
Numerous studies have supported the concept that various neurodegenerative disorders share overlapping clinical, genetic, and pathologic features. Although the clinical manifestations vary, some patients with FTD can also show features of PD or Parkinsonism syndromes, characterized as PSP, CBS, or DLBD. The identification of a hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene as a frequent cause of both FTD and ALS suggests a possible role of this genetic alteration in other dementias or Parkinsonism-related movement disorders. Herein, we demonstrate that the C9orf72 repeat expansion is not a common cause of disease for sporadic AD, FTD, PD, and other related movement disorders in our population.
Given the relatively small sample size of the individual patient groups in our series, we cannot definitively exclude the possibility of a role for the C9orf72 repeat expansion in disease risk. In parallel with our findings, other recent studies have also shown an absence of an association between repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene and disease susceptibility in AD, PD, or related Parkinsonism syndromes, especially in the Asian population (20–24). We speculate that one of the possible reasons why no expansions have been found in our cases or controls may be due to the fact that carriers of the repeat expansion at C9ORF72 arose from a European single common founder, implying that expansions are rare in non-Caucasian populations (25). Another possible reason is that we did not enroll any patients with ALS and the case number in the FTD group in small in our present study. Therefore, although the abnormal repeats of C9orf72 gene account for 23–47% of familial FTD with or without ALS and 4–20% of sporadic ALS (2, 21, 26), our observation combined with previous findings suggest that variation in the C9orf72 does not play a major role in the susceptibility to the wider spectrum of Parkinsonism and dementia syndromes. Pathological expansion of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeats may be specific to TDP-43 pathology-associated FTD and ALS.
Based on the allele frequencies in cases and controls, the first studies suggested that expansions with more than 30 repeats should be considered pathological, while alleles with <20 repeats are wild type (2). However, subsequent reports have found that some control subjects may have repeat numbers of 20–30, with 23 being the most frequently reported maximum repeat number (1, 26). Hence, the contribution of the intermediate-size alleles (20–29 repeats) to disease pathology needs to be further evaluated. Notably, recent studies demonstrated that intermediate expansions of the hexanucleotide repeats in C9orf72 may associate with an increased risk of PD, especially those with repeat numbers over 23 (10, 20, 27–29). In our study, we identified one young-onset PD patient harboring a repeat number of 25. The mechanism by which this intermediately expanded repeat number may cause this disease pathophysiology remains unclear. One hypothesis is that the expanded hexanucleotide repeat may bind to other RNAs, resulting in protein sequestration from normal processing and then decreased protein expression (2, 21). Future functional studies are necessary to elucidate the role of intermediate repeats in C9orf72 in neuronal degeneration.
In conclusion, our results do not suggest that an expanded repeat number in the C9orf72 gene plays a major role in the susceptibility to the wider spectrum of movement disorders. Further large-scale studies are required to investigate the clinical and biological significance of intermediate repeats in the C9orf72 gene in degenerative neurological disorders.
Statements
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants of the study. We also thank the staff of the Second Core Lab, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital for providing expert technical support. This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST102-2314-B-002-111-MY3).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
DeJesus-HernandezMMacKenzieIRBoeveBFBoxerALBakerMRutherfordNJet alExpanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron (2011) 72:245–56.10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011
2
RentonAEMajounieEWaiteASimón-SánchezJRollinsonSGibbsJRet alA hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron (2011) 72:257–68.10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010
3
van RheenenWvan BlitterswijkMHuismanMHVlamLvan DoormaalPTSeelenMet alHexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9ORF72 in the spectrum of motor neuron diseases. Neurology (2012) 79:878–82.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182661d14
4
RademakersRNeumannMMacKenzieIR. Advances in understanding the molecular basis of frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurol (2012) 8:423–34.10.1038/nrneurol.2012.117
5
UittiRJBerryKYasuharaOEisenAFeldmanHMcGeerPLet alNeurodegenerative ‘overlap’ syndrome: clinical and pathological features of Parkinson’s disease, motor neuron disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord (1995) 1:21–34.10.1016/1353-8020(95)00004-P
6
SeelaarHRohrerJDPijnenburgYAFoxNCvan SwietenJC. Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: a review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2011) 82:476–86.10.1136/jnnp.2010.212225
7
SundarPDYuCESiehWSteinbartEGarrutoRMOyanagiKet alTwo sites in the MAPT region confer genetic risk for Guam ALS/PDC and dementia. Hum Mol Genet (2007) 16:295–306.10.1093/hmg/ddl463
8
EspayAJLitvanI. Parkinsonism and frontotemporal dementia: the clinical overlap. J Mol Neurosci (2011) 45:343–9.10.1007/s12031-011-9632-1
9
SeltmanREMatthewsBR. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs (2012) 26:841–70.10.2165/11640070-000000000-00000
10
NuytemansKBademciGKohliMMBeechamGWWangLYoungJIet alC9ORF72 intermediate repeat copies are a significant risk factor for Parkinson disease. Ann Hum Genet (2013) 77:351–63.10.1111/ahg.12033
11
JosephsKAHodgesJRSnowdenJSMacKenzieIRNeumannMMannDMet alNeuropathological background of phenotypical variability in frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol (2011) 122:137–53.10.1007/s00401-011-0839-6
12
WuRMBoundsRLincolnSHulihanMLinCHHwuWLet alParkin mutations and early-onset Parkinsonism in a Taiwanese cohort. Arch Neurol (2005) 62:82–7.10.1001/archneur.62.1.82
13
LinCHHwuWLChiangSCTaiCHWuRM. Lack of mutations in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and 3 genes in a Taiwanese (ethnic Chinese) cohort of familial and early-onset Parkinsonism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet (2007) 144B:434–8.10.1002/ajmg.b.30427
14
LinCHTanEKChenMLTanLCLimHQChenGSet alNovel ATP13A2 variant associated with Parkinson disease in Taiwan and Singapore. Neurology (2008) 71:1727–32.10.1212/01.wnl.0000335167.72412.68
15
LeeMJMataIFLinCHTzenKYLincolnSJBoundsRet alGenotype-phenotype correlates in Taiwanese patients with early-onset recessive Parkinsonism. Mov Disord (2009) 24:104–8.10.1002/mds.22093
16
LinCHChenMLChenGSTaiCHWuRM. Novel variant Pro143Ala in HTRA2 contributes to Parkinson’s disease by inducing hyperphosphorylation of HTRA2 protein in mitochondria. Hum Genet (2011) 130:817–27.10.1007/s00439-011-1041-6
17
HughesAJDanielSEKilfordLLeesAJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (1992) 55:181–4.10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181
18
McKhannGMAlbertMSGrossmanMMillerBDicksonDTrojanowskiJQ. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol (2001) 58:1803–9.10.1001/archneur.58.11.1803
19
McKhannGDrachmanDFolsteinMKatzmanRPriceDStadlanEM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology (1984) 34:939–44.10.1212/WNL.34.7.939
20
XiZZinmanLGrinbergYMorenoDSatoCBilbaoJMet alInvestigation of c9orf72 in 4 neurodegenerative disorders. Arch Neurol (2012) 69:1583–90.10.1001/archneurol.2012.2016
21
Dejesus-HernandezMRayaproluSSoto-OrtolazaAIRutherfordNJHeckmanMGTraynorSet alAnalysis of the C9orf72 repeat in Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor and restless legs syndrome. Parkinsonism Relat Disord (2013) 19:198–201.10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.09.013
22
JiaoBGuoJFWangYQYanXXZhouLLiuXYet alC9orf72 mutation is rare in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and essential tremor in China. Front Cell Neurosci (2013) 7:164.10.3389/fncel.2013.00164
23
OgakiKLiYTakanashiMIshikawaKKobayashiTNonakaTet alAnalyses of the MAPT, PGRN, and C9orf72 mutations in Japanese patients with FTLD, PSP, and CBS. Parkinsonism Relat Disord (2013) 19:15–20.10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.06.019
24
YehTHLaiSCWengYHKuoHCWu-ChouYHHuangCLet alScreening for C9orf72 repeat expansions in Parkinsonian syndromes. Neurobiol Aging (2013) 34(1311):e1313–4.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.002
25
SmithBNNewhouseSShatunovAVanceCToppSJohnsonLet alThe C9ORF72 expansion mutation is a common cause of ALS±FTD in Europe and has a single founder. Eur J Hum Genet (2013) 21:102–8.10.1038/ejhg.2012.98
26
GijselinckIVan LangenhoveTvan der ZeeJSleegersKPhiltjensSKleinbergerGet alA C9orf72 promoter repeat expansion in a Flanders-Belgian cohort with disorders of the frontotemporal lobar degeneration-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum: a gene identification study. Lancet Neurol (2012) 11:54–65.10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70261-7
27
MajounieEAbramzonYRentonAEKellerMFTraynorBJSingletonAB. Large C9orf72 repeat expansions are not a common cause of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging (2012) 33(2527):e2521–2.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.007
28
DaoudHNoreauARochefortDPaquin-LanthierGGauthierMTProvencherPet alInvestigation of C9orf72 repeat expansions in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging (2013) 34:.e1717–9.10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.11.025
29
LesageSILe BerICondroyerCBroussolleEGabelleAThoboisSet alC9orf72 repeat expansions are a rare genetic cause of Parkinsonism. Brain (2013) 136:385–91.10.1093/brain/aws357
Summary
Keywords
C9orf72, frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease, Parkinsonism, risk factor
Citation
Lin C-H, Chen T-F, Chiu M-J, Lin H-I and Wu R-M (2014) Lack of C9orf72 Repeat Expansion in Taiwanese Patients with Mixed Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front. Neurol. 5:59. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00059
Received
10 March 2014
Accepted
11 April 2014
Published
28 April 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Tibor Hortobágyi, University of Debrecen, Hungary
Reviewed by
Youn-Bok Lee, Kings College London, UK; Bradley N. Smith, Kings College London, UK
Copyright
© 2014 Lin, Chen, Chiu, Lin and Wu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ruey-Meei Wu, Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan e-mail: robinwu@ntu.edu.tw
This article was submitted to Neurodegeneration, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.