Staged Endovascular Treatment for Symptomatic Occlusion Originating From the Intracranial Vertebral Arteries in the Early Non-acute Stage

Abstract

Background: The ideal treatment for patients who survive from acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion but develop aggressive ischemic events despite maximal medical therapy in the early non-acute stage is unknown. This paper reports the technical feasibility and outcome of staged endovascular treatment in a series of such patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery occlusion.

Methods: Ten consecutive patients who presented with aggressive ischemic events in the early non-acute stage of intracranial vertebral artery occlusion from Jan 2015 to Nov 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, eight male and two female patients with a mean age of 66.7 years developed aggressive ischemic events, and the NIHSS score was elevated by a median of 7 points despite medical therapy. All patients received staged endovascular treatment 4–21 days from onset, at an average of 11 days. The strategy of staged treatment was as follows: first, a microwire was passed through the portion of the occlusion, which was then dilated with balloon inflation to maintain the perfusion above TICI grade 2b. Then, with the use of antiplatelet drugs, the residual intravascular thrombus was gradually eliminated by the continuous perfusion and an activated fibrinolytic system, leaving the residual stenosis. A second stage of angioplasty with stent implantation was subsequently performed if residual stenosis was ≥50%. The NIHSS scores and mRS scores were compared between pre- and post-endovascular treatment groups and in the follow-up period.

Results: Technical success was achieved in 9 patients who received staged endovascular treatment (perforation occurred in one patient during the first stage). The NIHSS scores were significantly improved, with a median score 7 points lower on discharge compared with the scores for the most severe status. Favorable outcomes with mRS score ≤ 2 were achieved in 7 and 9 patients at the 3-month follow-up and the latest follow-up, respectively, which was better than the preoperative status.

Conclusion: Staged endovascular treatment might be a safe, efficient, and viable option in carefully selected patients with symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery occlusion in the early non-acute stage. However, this needs to be confirmed by further investigation, preferably in a large, controlled setting.

Introduction

Acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion is a serious condition with high mortality rates that range from 80 to 95% (1). Thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy has historically achieved rates of recanalization of 45–78%, which provides the patients with favorable functional outcomes (2). However, effective therapies for acute treatment of ischemic stroke rely on timely restoration of the blood supply to salvageable brain tissue. Currently, only 10–20% of stroke patients in China reach the hospital within 3 h of the stroke onset (3). In addition, fewer than 3% of patients receive intravenous thrombolysis, a proportion much lower than that in high-income countries (4). A subset of patients with vertebrobasilar artery occlusion survive the acute events without endovascular recanalization due to the leptomeningeal collaterals; however, as the collaterals usually fail to provide sufficient perfusion during periods of increased oxygen demand, the patients may develop recurrent or aggressive ischemic events and progressive disability in the early non-acute stage (>24 h) despite intensive medical therapy. These patients miss the optimal period for endovascular recanalization, and extracranial-intracranial bypass treatment is not recommended in such cases because of technical challenges and a high risk of morbidity and mortality (5, 6). Herein, we report our experience with staged endovascular treatment in such patients.

Methods

Patient Enrollment

We retrospectively reviewed our maintained neurointerventional database for cases from January 2015 to November 2020 at Peking University First Hospital, Beijing. We identified consecutive cases of the intracranial vertebral artery occlusion in the early non-acute stage in our database. According to the results of the DAWN clinical trials, the time window of thrombectomy can be extended to 24 h (7), and the thrombosis is almost organized about 1 month after the occlusion (8), therefore, we defined the “early non-acute stage” as the time from 24 h to 1 month after the onset of ischemic stroke. Ten patients receiving endovascular treatment in this stage were enrolled in this study, including 8 males and 2 females with a mean age of 66.7 years (range: 52–78 years) (Table 1). All patients had high-risk factors for stroke (Table 1), and they all suffered typical ischemic symptoms of posterior circulation, such as vertigo, ataxia, dysarthria, blurred vision, facial paralysis, dysphagia and weakness. The National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score at onset ranged from 3 to 11, with a median of 6. None of these patients had undergone intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy in the acute phase of infarction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) examinations showed new or recent infarctions in the territory of the vertebrobasilar artery. All patients received CT angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) examination, which confirmed that the dominant intracranial vertebral artery was occluded and that the contralateral vertebral artery was occluded, hypoplastic, or severely stenotic. Although intensive medical therapy and strict control of risk factors were used, these patients experienced elevated NIHSS scores and severe neurological manifestations such as disturbance of consciousness and hemiplegia. The NIHSS scores were 4–10 points higher in the most severe stage than at onset, with a median increase of 7 points. Because of the aggravation of symptoms despite extensive medical treatment, these patients ultimately received neuroendovascular treatment. The time between symptom onset and endovascular recanalization ranged from 4 to 21 days, with an average of 11 days (Table 1). Each patient himself or his or her family members were authorized to sign an informed consent form, and the protocol for this recanalization study was approved by our institutional ethics committee (No. G202037).

Strategy of Endovascular Treatment

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria for recanalization treatment were as follows: (1) patient age >18 years and <80 years; (2) the patient had evidence of infarctions related to intracranial vertebral artery distribution on MRI; (3) the patient was in an early non-acute stage of intracranial vertebral artery occlusion; (4) the unilateral or dominant intracranial vertebral artery was completely occluded together with total occlusion, hypoplasia, absence, or severe (≥70%) stenosis of the contralateral vertebral artery; (5) the patient had severe neurological manifestations refractory to maximal medical therapy, including double antiplatelet therapy plus a statin use and management of risk factors (e.g., smoking, drinking, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hyperhomocysteinemia); (6) the patient had at least one atherosclerotic risk factor; and (7) the grade of collateral flow was ≤3 (according to the modified grading system of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) (9).

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) non-atherosclerotic occlusion, e.g., arterial dissection or vasculitis; (2) intracranial hemorrhage on CT or MRI; (3) known allergies or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, tirofiban, contrast medium, metal, etc.; (4) life expectancy <1 year due to other diseases, such as malignant tumors; and (5) other conditions that were unconducive to general anesthesia or surgery.

Neurointerventional Procedure

All patients were scheduled to receive two stages of endovascular treatment. In the first stage, the procedure was performed under local anesthesia. Heparin was given as an anticoagulant throughout the procedure in all cases to maintain an activated clotting time between 250 and 300 s. Cerebral angiography was first performed to evaluate the condition of all cerebral arteries and collateral perfusion. After confirmation of the occlusive lesion, which usually included the V3 and V4 segments of the vertebral artery, a 6F guiding catheter (Envoy, Cordis, USA) was placed in the distal V2 segment. Then, an Echelon-10 microcatheter (Medtronic, USA) or an Excelsior SL-10 microcatheter (Stryker Neurovascular, USA) with the support of a Pilot-50 microwire (Abbott, USA) or a Synchro 14 microwire (Stryker Neurovascular, USA) was advanced through the occlusive lesion. Once injection confirmed that the microcatheter was in the true lumen of the distal part, a 300-cm-long Transend 300 Floppy microwire (Stryker Neurovascular, USA) was advanced to replace the microcatheter. Then, a Gateway angioplasty balloon (Stryker Neurovascular, USA) was placed at the site of the occlusion and inflated from the distal part to the proximal portions. Anterograde flow through the occluded portion was graded using the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) grading system (10). Technical success in this stage was determined by recanalization with a TICI grade of ≥2b. If the TICI grade was <2b or the perfusion did not remain stable for over 30 min during the observation, one or more additional balloons could be used and inflated in the same way until the TICI grade was ≥2b; meanwhile, a bolus dose of tirofiban was injected through the guiding catheter, and then additional tirofiban was continuously infused intravenously for 48 h. Throughout the treatment process, we communicated with the patients to monitor their discomfort and conducted timely physical examinations if necessary.

After the first stage of endovascular treatment, a head CT scan was performed in the first 24 h after intervention. Intravenous injection of tirofiban was routinely used for 48 h, and preoperative drugs were maintained. Blood pressure was controlled below 140/90 mmHg. Follow-up CTA, MRA or transcranial Doppler (TCD) was performed once a week after the recanalization procedure. If the thrombus in the intracranial vertebral artery was eliminated and the residual stenosis was more than 50% or if there was a dissection in the portion with stenosis, a second stage of the neurointerventional procedure was performed. Nine patients with residual stenosis <50% received a second stage of endovascular treatment, and one patient had complication of dissection. The average interval between the two endovascular treatments was 15.6 d (11–25 d) (Table 2).

In the second stage of endovascular treatment, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. A 6F guiding catheter was placed in the V2 segment of the vertebral artery, and then a microwire was advanced through the stenotic lesion. A Gateway balloon was placed in the lesion and inflated, and then a balloon expanding Apollo stent (MicroPort Medical, Shanghai, China) or a self expanding nitinol Wingspan stent (Stryker Neurovascular, USA) was released across the stenotic lesion. Post-balloon inflation was performed if there was more than 40% residual stenosis. After the second stage of neurointerventional therapy, dual antiplatelet drugs were maintained for at least 6 months, and aspirin alone was given every day thereafter. Rehabilitation treatment was recommended for patients with functional disability (Illustrative case in Figure 1).

Figure 1

Follow-Up Study and Statistical Analysis

All patients were followed up regularly. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and NIHSS scores were applied before endovascular treatment, at discharge and at follow-up. CTA, MRA or cerebral catheter angiography was performed at the 6-month or 1-year follow-up.

SPSS 16.0 statistical software was used for analysis. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the NIHSS and mRS scores before the operation, at discharge and during the follow-up. The difference was statistically significant if P < 0.05.

Results

Cerebral catheter angiography showed that all the 10 patients suffered occlusion of the intracranial vertebral artery on the dominant side. The occlusion sites included the V4 segment of the vertebral artery in 4 patients, originating at the V4 segment and extending to the V3 segment in 5 patients, and originating at the V4 segment and extending to the V2 segment in one patient. Collateral perfusion of the posterior circulation commonly came from the posterior communicating arteries (PCOMs) (5/10) and hypoplastic or stenotic contralateral vertebral arteries (3/10). Technical success of recanalization during the first stage was achieved in 9 cases, in whom the final perfusion was achieved at least on TICI 2b. The procedure failed in 1 patient (case 4) due to microwire perforation of the vertebral artery. Although the patient didn't suffer a symptomatic deterioration after the operation, he died of pneumonia and respiratory failure 3 months after discharge. Another patient (case 3) experienced asymptomatic dissection of the intracranial vertebral artery after the first stage of endovascular treatment (Illustrative case in Figure 2). The mean interval time between the two stages of neuroendovascular treatment was 15.6 d (11–25 d), and during which there were no hemorrhagic complications. Angiographic examination revealed that the residual thrombi in the vertebral arteries were all eliminated, leaving severe stenosis (>50%) in all patients. Then, the patients underwent angioplasty with stent implantation, during which nine stents were implanted, including 6 balloon-expanded Apollo stents and 3 self-expanding Wingspan stents. One patient (case 6) experienced aggressive headaches and disturbed consciousness after stent implantation, and a CT scan showed subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) around the pons and medulla associated with moderate hydrocephalus. The patient recovered well with ventricular drainage and rehabilitation. Among the 10 patients, symptoms and NIHSS and mRS scores had improved in 9 at the time of discharge. The NIHSS scores were significantly improved by a median of 7 points on discharge compared with the scores for the most severe status (P < 0.05). The patients were followed up for a mean of 12.8 months (range: 5–36). Excluding the patient who died (case 4), the median mRS scores were 2 (range: 0–3) at the 90-day follow-up and 1 (range: 0–2) at the latest follow-up, both of which were much better than the median score before the first stage of endovascular treatment (range: 4–5; median: 4) (P < 0.05). Angiographic follow-up was available for 7 patients, most of whom had no or mild in-stent stenosis (Table 2).

Figure 2

Discussion

Acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion is a life-threatening condition and requires immediate treatment. Despite recent advances in stroke care, the rate of poor outcomes for those with vertebrobasilar artery occlusion remains high (11). In 2016, a meta-analysis of 5 recent landmark endovascular therapy trials confirmed the superiority and better outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in large-vessel occlusion for acute anterior circulation strokes (12). Several subsequent trials showed that high rates (ranging from 79 to 96.86%) of successful reperfusion and favorable outcomes could also be achieved in acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion patients (13–15). Subsequent studies also showed that the window for thrombectomy in cases of acute ischemic stroke could be carefully extended to 24 or 16 h (7, 16, 17). However, there are still limited studies reporting on the ideal treatment strategy in patients presenting more than 24 h from stroke symptom onset. Some patients survived the acute stage of vertebrobasilar artery occlusion because of the collateral flow but developed aggressive ischemic events and progressive disability in the following stage despite receiving maximal medical therapy. A prior study by our group has reported carotid-vertebral artery bypass with saphenous vein grafts for symptomatic V1 segment occlusion (18). However, for patients with intracranial vertebral artery occlusion, bypass surgery is risky and technically challenging (5). Although it has been reported that multiple stenoses or occlusions in the posterior circulation might hide an underlying inflammatory vascular disease, which might increase the interventional risk (19), some researchers have attempted to recanalize the occluded intracranial vertebral artery with endovascular therapy in the non-acute stage.

There is limited literature reporting on interventional therapy for large occluded intracranial vessels beyond the acute phase (1, 2, 20, 21). In a recent study, Gao et al. summarized six previous studies on endovascular recanalization for non-acute occlusions after 2009 (21). In the seven reported studies, including the cases reported by Gao et al. there were 72 patients with early non-acute (6) or chronic (66) occlusion of the intracranial vertebral artery or basilar artery who received endovascular treatment, and the success rate of the technique was 93% (67 in 72 cases), with a mortality rate of 1.39% (1 in 72 cases). In our case series, the technical success rate was 90%, and the mortality was 0% at discharge. Complications occurred in 2 patients: asymptomatic intracranial vertebral artery dissection in one patient and subarachnoid hemorrhage in the other patient (case 6), which might be associated with heavy calcification in the intracranial vertebral artery because a recent study showed that larger vertebrobasilar artery calcification volumes were a significant predictor of reduced technical success and functional independence and increased mortality (22). Although our results seemed encouraging, it should be emphasized that revascularization of intracranial vertebral artery occlusion in the early non-acute stage is a high-risk procedure.

The major technical challenge during the first stage of endovascular recanalization is traversing the occlusion site with a microwire. Gao et al. indicated that preoperative high-resolution MRI (HRMRI) and simultaneous two-vessel injection during the recanalization procedure might be helpful in guiding the wire to the distal cavity (21). HRMRI is helpful in the diagnosis of intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and luminal thrombosis and can help to identify the subset of patients with high embolism risk before the procedure (23). Simultaneous two-vessel injection is a good technique for helping the surgeon advance the microwire to the true lumen of the distal vessel. In our case series, this technique was not conducted because the procedure of recanalization procedure was performed under local anesthesia, as slight movements make the road map images unclear. It is critical to communicate with the patient frequently during the procedure. If the patient complains of pain, sweating, nausea, or vomiting, it usually indicates that the microwire has penetrated the blood vessel wall. In our case series, there were two patients (case 3 with dissection and case 4 with perforation) with intraoperative complications. Both of these patients complained of pain as the microwire was being advanced through the occlusion, and sweating and vomiting occurred in case 4. We suspect that patients' self-reports might be more accurate and occur earlier than indications from angiography in reflecting whether the microwire is in the true lumen.

Treatment of early non-acute thrombi is the key to recanalization. In the acute stage, it is advisable to use recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy because the thrombus is not firm. In the chronic stage, as the thrombus is well-organized and strongly adhered to the vessel wall, the key point of recanalization is to pass the microwire through the occluded lesion, and there is no need to deal with the organized thrombus except for performing balloon inflation. There are no reports in the literature regarding how to deal with an intravascular thrombus in the early non-acute stage of occlusion, as recanalization treatment is a relatively contraindicated in this stage, and there is a considerable risk of hemorrhagic conversion with early revascularization. In our previous cases involving anterior circulation, we attempted thrombectomy with aspiration and a stent retriever, which failed because the thrombus had a gum-like consistency. New-generation aspiration devices with larger bores and stronger suction force might be useful in clearing the thrombus from the proximal part of the original stenosis (24); however, we speculate that there could be many thrombi in the distal part of the stenoses due to the absence of continuous perfusion, and the aspiration catheter should not be placed over the original stenotic part to aspirate the distal thrombus as this would be dangerous and might result in dissection or thrombus translocation. In our research, we found that the thrombus in the early non-acute stage could be inflated by a balloon without translocation, and the anterograde flow could be achieved stably. Furthermore, these thrombi could be slowly eliminated through sustained blood flow, an activated human fibrinolytic system, and antiplatelet drugs. Among the 9 patients undergoing staged treatment, thromboembolisms did not occur during our observation, suggesting that thrombus elimination with drugs and the patient's own fibrinolytic system is safe. CTA or MRA can clearly show the intraluminal structure, including the dissection and thrombolysis (25–27). Through weekly CTA or MRA examination, we observed that the time to complete thrombus elimination was ~2 weeks, depending on the length of the thrombus, the time from occlusion, the degree of perfusion recovery and the response of patients to antiplatelet drugs. After thrombus elimination, angioplasty with stenting in the severe residual stenotic area becomes straightforward.

Although staged treatment increases the length of hospitalization, our strategy still has some advantages. First, after the initial intervention treatment, there is usually moderate to severe residual stenosis due to the residual thrombus, which limits the perfusion to the basilar artery and reduces the risk of hemorrhagic conversion. Second, in the later stage, the stent does not need to be implanted if the residual stenosis is not severe or only one stent needs to be deployed in the residual severely stenotic portion; thus, it is not necessary to use multiple stents to cover the thrombus, as it would be if only one stage of treatment were performed. Third, our strategy avoids the deployment of stents in the atlantoaxial segments of the vertebral artery, where stents may be develop fractures or in-stent occlusion in the long term as a result of cervical movement. Finally, our study showed good outcomes with an acceptable rate of technical success and a low rate of severe complications.

There are also many limitations in our study. First, the number of subjects was small (n = 10). Future studies with a greater number of included subjects could provide more persuasive evidence. Second, this is a retrospective study and lacks a control group, and therefore, it does not definitively show that staged intervention is more beneficial than other treatment strategies. Third, after revascularization in the first stage, we injected a loading dose of tirofiban into the blood vessel and maintained it for 48 h. Although recent research conducted by Quan et al. showed that low-dose tirofiban did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality in endovascular treatment of acute intracranial vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (15), its safety, effectiveness and necessity in the early non-acute stage of occlusion recanalization need to be further confirmed. Forth, some recent studies have shown that simultaneous endovascular recanalization and stent implantation may be safe and effective for such patients (23). However, how to select these patients and avoid the risks of hemorrhagic transformation needs further research. Fifth, in this study, we used TICI grading as a measure of technical success for posterior circulation, which is mostly commonly used for anterior circulation. Although some other authors have also used this grading system, AOL might be better in evaluating the posterior circulation (23, 28). Sixth, NIHSS is not ideal to assess stroke in the posterior circulation, because several manifestations of stroke in the posterior circulation, such as vertigo, vomiting, gait instability, and truncal ataxia, are not represented on the NIHSS scale (29). Furthermore, the several angiographic examinations of CTA or catheter angiography increase the risk of renal injury in patients. Finally, as there was variability in the types of stents used (balloon-mounted and self-expanding stents), the durability of stents in this context is also unclear and needs to be further studied. However, our results are encouraging, with a high recanalization rate and a low rate of significant intracranial hemorrhage. Our strategy may be considered an option in a highly select group of patients who have aggressive ischemic events or symptoms despite maximal medical therapy. The effectiveness of this approach in the prevention of progressive strokes and in the improvement of long-term outcomes should be evaluated prospectively in the future.

Conclusions

Our report based on a small case series suggests that staged neuroendovascular treatment of intracranial vertebral artery occlusion in the early non-acute stage is feasible, with an acceptable rate of technical success and a low rate of complications. However, its efficacy and safety need further investigation, preferably in a randomized controlled setting.

References

• 1.

  HeYBaiWLiTXueJWangZZhuLet al. Perioperative complications of recanalization and stenting for symptomatic nonacute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. Ann Vasc Surg. (2014) 28:386–93. 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  LinRAleuAJankowitzBKostovDKanaanHHorowitzMet al. Endovascular revascularization of chronic symptomatic vertebrobasilar occlusion. J Neuroimaging. (2012) 22:74–9. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00554.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  JiangBRuXSunHLiuHSunDLiuYet al. Pre-hospital delay and its associated factors in first-ever stroke registered in communities from three cities in China. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:29795. 10.1038/srep29795

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  WangYLiZZhaoXWangCWangXWangDet al. Effect of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention on hospital personnel adherence to performance measures in patients with acute ischemic stroke in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2018) 320:245–54. 10.1001/jama.2018.8802

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  RennertRCSteinbergJAStricklandBARavinaKBakhsheshianJFredricksonVet al. Extracranial-to-intracranial bypass for refractory vertebrobasilar insufficiency. World Neurosurg. (2019) 126:552–9. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.184

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  BritzGWAgarwalVMihlonFRamanathanDAgrawalANimjeeSMet al. Radial artery bypass for intractable vertebrobasilar insufficiency: case series and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. (2016) 85:106–13. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  NogueiraRGJadhavAPHaussenDCBonafeABudzikRFBhuvaPet al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:11–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  RoAKageyamaNMukaiT. Pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism with respect to the anatomical features of the deep veins of lower limbs: a review. Ann Vasc Dis. (2017) 10:99–106. 10.3400/avd.ra.17-00035

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  LeeWJJungKHRyuYJKimJMLeeSTChuKet al. Utility of digital subtraction angiography-based collateral evaluation in medically treated acute symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Eur J Neurol. (2017) 24:1148–55. 10.1111/ene.13351

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  HigashidaRTFurlanAJRobertsHTomsickTConnorsBBarrJet al. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2003) 34:e109–37. 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  WajimaDAketaSNakagawaIMasuiKYonezawaTEnamiTet al. Effectiveness of intracranial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting for atherosclerotic vertebrobasilar artery occlusion in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg. (2017) 97:253–60. 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.106

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  GoyalMMenonBKvan ZwamWHDippelDWMitchellPJDemchukAMet al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  BouslamaMHaussenDCAghaebrahimAGrossbergJAWalkerGRangarajuSet al. Predictors of good outcome after endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar occlusion stroke. Stroke. (2017) 48:3252–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018270

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  SingerOCBerkefeldJNolteCHBohnerGHaringHPTrenklerJet al. Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study. Ann Neurol. (2015) 77:415–24. 10.1002/ana.24336

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  QuanTHouHXueWYuGMaHSunJet al. Endovascular treatment of acute intracranial vertebrobasilar artery occlusion: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Neuroradiology. (2019) 61:1477–84. 10.1007/s00234-019-02282-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  FeilKReidlerPKunzWGKüpperCHeinrichJLaubCet al. Addressing a real-life problem: treatment with intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with an extended time window beyond 4.5 h based on computed tomography perfusion imaging. Eur J Neurol. (2020) 27:168–74. 10.1111/ene.14051

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  AlbersGWMarksMPKempSChristensenSTsaiJPOrtega-GutierrezSet al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:708–18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1713973

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  DuanHMoDZhangYZhangJLiL. Carotid-vertebral artery bypass with saphenous vein graft for symptomatic vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Neurosurg Focus. (2019) 46:E8. 10.3171/2018.11.FOCUS18360

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  ElhfnawyAMElsalamawyDAbdelraoufMSchliesserMVolkmannJFluriF. Red flags for a concomitant giant cell arteritis in patients with vertebrobasilar stroke: a cross-sectional study and systematic review. Acta Neurol Belg. (2020) 120:1389–98. 10.1007/s13760-020-01344-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  AghaebrahimAJovinTJadhavAPNoorianAGuptaRNogueiraRG. Endovascular recanalization of complete subacute to chronic atherosclerotic occlusions of intracranial arteries. J Neurointerv Surg. (2014) 6:645–8. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010842

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  GaoPWangYMaYYangQSongHChenYet al. Endovascular recanalization for chronic symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery total occlusion: experience of a single center and review of literature. J Neuroradiol. (2018) 45:295–304. 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.12.023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  DiproseWKDiproseJPTarrGPSutcliffeJMcFetridgeABrewSet al. Vertebrobasilar artery calcification and outcomes in posterior circulation large vessel occlusion thrombectomy. Stroke. (2020) 51:1301–4. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027958

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  ZhaoWZhangJMengYZhangYZhangJSongYet al. Symptomatic atherosclerotic non-acute intracranial vertebral artery total occlusion: clinical features, imaging characteristics, endovascular recanalization, and follow-up outcomes. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:598795. 10.3389/fneur.2020.598795

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  TonettiDADesaiSMCasilloSZussmanBMBrownMWJadhavAPet al. Large-bore aspiration catheter selection does not influence reperfusion or outcome after manual aspiration thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:637–40. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014633

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  PorelliSLeonardiMStafaABarbaraCProcacciantiGSimonettiL. CT angiography in an acute stroke protocol: correlation between occlusion site and outcome of intravenous thrombolysis. Interv Neuroradiol. (2013) 19:87–96. 10.1177/159101991301900114

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  CovelloBRChukusA. Vertebral artery dissection: a pain in the neck. Cureus. (2021) 13:e12985. 10.7759/cureus.12985

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  BeutlerBDRangaswamyRKingRDTabaacBJ. Delayed endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke in a young woman with no known risk factors: a case report. Am J Case Rep. (2021) 22:e930291. 10.12659/AJCR.930291

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  PampanaEFabianoSDe RubeisGBertacciniLStasollaAPingiAet al. Switch strategy from direct aspiration first pass technique to solumbra improves technical outcome in endovascularly treated stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:2670. 10.3390/ijerph18052670

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  ElhfnawyAMAbdEl-Raouf MVolkmannJFluriFElsalamawyD. Relation of infarction location and volume to vertigo in vertebrobasilar stroke. Brain Behav. (2020) 10:e01564. 10.1002/brb3.1564

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar