Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 12 September 2024
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Neuroplasticity in Multiple Sclerosis View all articles

Systematic review of photobiomodulation for multiple sclerosis

  • 1Centro Universitário FAMINAS, Muriaé, MG, Brazil
  • 2Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
  • 3Hospital do Câncer de Muriaé, Fundação Cristiano Varella (FCV), Muriaé, MG, Brazil
  • 4Centro Universitário Redentor (UniREDENTOR/Afya), Itaperuna, RJ, Brazil

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory chronic autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorder of the brain and spinal cord, resulting in loss of motor, sensorial, and cognitive function. Among the non-pharmacological interventions for several brain conditions, photobiomodulation (PBM) has gained attention in medical society for its neuroprotective effects. We systematically reviewed the effects of PBM on MS.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on the bibliographic databases (PubMed and ScienceDirect) with the keywords based on MeSH terms: PBM, low-level laser therapy, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, demyelination, and progressive multiple sclerosis. Data search was limited from 2012 to July 2024. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The initial systematic search identified 126 articles. Of these, 68 articles were removed by duplicity and 50 by screening. Thus, 8 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria.

Results: The reviewed studies showed that PBM modulates brain markers linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Improvements in motor, sensorial, and cognitive functions in MS patients were also observed after PBM therapy. No study reported adverse effects of PBM.

Conclusion: These findings suggest the potential of PBM as a promising non-pharmacological intervention for the management of MS, although further research is needed to standardize PBM protocols and assess its long-term effects.

1 Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, chronic autoimmune, and neurodegenerative disorder of the brain and spinal cord that results in loss of motor, sensorial, and cognitive function (13). According to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, MS affects more than 2 million people worldwide (3, 4).

This disorder starts with an inflammatory cascade in the central nervous system (CNS), which is caused by inappropriately activated T cells which in turn induces an immune response against myelin and oligodendrocytes (1, 57).

Clinically, MS begins with discrete episodes of neurological dysfunction followed by partial, complete, or no remission. Over time, most patients develop a sustained accumulation of disability, known as secondary progressive MS (SPMS) (8, 9). About 10% of MS develop accumulation of disability from clinical onset with no reporting a preceding period of clinical relapses and remissions and are known as primary progressive MS (PPMS) (9). Despite these different classifications, all clinical forms of MS seem to reflect the same underlying disease process (10).

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive technique that uses red-to-near-infrared light to stimulate wound healing, reducing pain and inflammation in several diseases (11). PBM also improves brain functions in several conditions (1215). For example, Disner et al. (14) reported that transcranial PBM at 1064 nm wavelength reduces depression symptoms in participants with better response to attention bias modification. Vargas et al. (15) observed that infrared PBM at 1064 nm, 250 mW/cm2, improved the cognitive function and EEG rhythms of older adults with memory complaints. Animal studies have observed similar effects (1618). Salehpour et al. (18) reported that PBM prevented cognitive impairment induced by sleep-deprived. In addition, PBM enhanced the antioxidant status and increased mitochondrial activity in the hippocampus of sleep-deprived mice. Our research group noted that PBM increased the levels of interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and decreased the levels of IL-5 and the expression of p38 stress-activated protein kinase (p38) in both the cortex and hippocampus of aged rats (16). These promising effects of PBM have been investigated from various perspectives, including in neuroinflammatory response (19, 20).

Based on the well-documented therapeutic effects of PBM in different neurological conditions (1618, 2124), we systematically review the effects of PBM in MS.

2 Methods

2.1 Search strategy and sources

We used the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases with the keywords based on MeSH terms: photobiomodulation, low-level laser therapy, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, demyelination, and progressive multiple sclerosis. Data search was limited from 2012 to June 2024. This study followed the guideline of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (25). Two evaluators made the evaluations, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

2.2 Selection criteria

The search strategy included experimental and clinical studies using PBM in MS. We included original in vitro and clinical articles written in English.

2.3 Data extraction and data synthesis

For data extraction, we used an individualized data form (26), in which articles were subdivided according to the author, subjects, light source, PBM parameters (center wavelength, operation mode, average radiant power, irradiance at aperture, beam spot size, exposure duration, radiant exposure, number of points irradiated, number of sessions, total radiant energy) and outcomes. The data are presented in the Results section.

3 Results

3.1 Study selection

The initial database search resulted in 126 studies. Of these, 68 articles were removed due to duplicity, 50 were screened out, and 8 studies were included in the systematic review. The process of selecting the articles is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Summary of article search and selection process.

3.2 Study characteristics

Four articles reported experiments in mice (2730), of which 2 were on female C57BL/6 (29, 30) and 2 were on male C57BL/6 (27, 28) (Table 1). In these studies, the age of animals varied from 6 to 10 weeks old. In humans, 4 articles reported a randomized clinical trial in men and women aged 18–60 diagnosed with MS (3134) (Table 2). In all studies, the subjects received PBM treatment. The studies aimed to analyze the effects of PBM on the damages caused by MS, inflammatory response and oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity, demyelination, microglial modulation, and apoptosis.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Evidence of PBM in animal models of MS.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Evidence of PBM in MS patients.

4 Discussion

This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of PBM therapy in MS. Studies have shown that laser therapy reduces the clinical signs of disease and demyelination and exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. In addition, PBM increases the expression of genes linked to cellular proliferation and reduces apoptosis.

4.1 PBM-induced changes in clinical signs

Studies show that the laser improves clinical signs in patients with MS (3133). In the study conducted by Seada et al. (33), the laser treatment performed three times per week on consecutive days (24 sessions) reduced trigeminal pain and increased mouth opening, masseter, and temporalis muscles. In another study, Kubsik et al. (31) observed that, after PBM treatment with 21 sessions, MS patients improved their functional status based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of Kurtzke and Barthel Index. Also, Rouhani et al. (32) noted an improvement in force recovery of patients treated with 4 sessions of PBM treatment. These therapeutic effects of PBM have also been observed in laboratory animals (2729). Among the models studied in the literature are: experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and cuprizone intoxication (3538). In these models, the onset and progression of the disease are determined by a clinical score based on the progressive appearance of paralysis, the origin of locomotor deficits, and the gradual disability of the pathology (35, 36). In the study conducted by Gonçalves, thirty sessions of PBM (660 nm and 904 nm) were able to reduce clinical score and delay the disease onset in EAE mice. Also, a body weight gain was observed in the animals from the laser group. In the study by Duarte (27), cuprizone-induced MS model animals that received six sessions of laser treatment (808 nm) applied on three consecutive days for 2 weeks showed an improvement in motor performance. These data suggest that PBM improves the clinical signs of MS.

4.2 Anti-inflammatory effects of PBM

The diagnosis of MS is established in conjunction with the clinical presentation and inflammatory lesions (39). In this sense, studies performed on patients (34) and animal models of MS (27, 28, 30) show that PBM modulates the levels of inflammatory markers. For example, after 24 sessions of PBM twice a week, the expression of IL-10 increased significantly in MS patients (34). It is known that the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines is inhibited by the secretion of IL10 (40). These data are interesting, given that patients with MS exhibit reduced levels of IL-10 in mononuclear cells (41). In animal models of MS, it is also possible to observe the anti-inflammatory properties of PBM (2729). For example, after PBM, a decrease was observed in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and an increase in IL-4 and IL-10 (anti-inflammatory cytokines) (29). Goncalves et al. (28) noted that EAE mice showed profound infiltration of inflammatory cells into the CNS, particularly in the white matter region, and a pronounced increase in IL-17, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and IL-1b levels. However, PBM reduced the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the CNS of EAE mice. In addition, PBM inhibited the upregulation of IL-17, IFN-γ, and IL-1b. These findings are essential since the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α initiates and propagates a pro-inflammatory response, generating demyelination of CNS axons by multiple mechanisms, including cytokine-mediated demyelination (42). In this sense, Duarte et al. (27) observed that PBM attenuated the degree of demyelination in the corpus callosum of cuprizone-induced MS model animals, accompanied by a better clinical outcome. In addition, the authors investigated microglial and astrocyte activation. They noted a reduced severity of astrogliosis (GFAP) and microglia (IBA-1) immunoreactivity in the corpus callosum of the cuprizone-induced MS model submitted to PBM treatment. Glial cell activation and inflammatory response are critical hallmarks of MS in humans and animal models (43). About high levels of GFAP, it is known that these high levels in CSF are associated with the progression of MS (4446) and with clinical disability (44, 46).

4.3 Antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects of PBM in MS

Studies show that levels of oxidative stress markers are increased in MS model animals (4749). However, it is suggested that reduction of oxidative stress prevents the progression of MS, mainly by protecting against apoptosis (5052). In this sense, in the studies conducted by Muili et al. (30) and Goncalves et al. (28), it was shown that animal models of MS submitted to treatment with PBM exhibit a decrease in oxidative stress markers, such as: nitric oxide (NO), inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) and nitrite. In addition, animal models of MS that received PBM treatment exhibited up-regulation of the Bcl-2 anti-apoptosis gene, an increased Bcl-2: Bax ratio, and reduced apoptosis in the spinal cord (30).

4.4 Limitations

Our systematic review presents limitations, mainly because it only analyzed 4 studies with MS patients. The research highlighted in this review shows the therapeutic potential of PBM on MS. However, the lack of details about the PBM parameters used in each work make it difficult to replicate these approaches. Standardization of the PBM protocols would facilitate comparison between the findings of the studies.

5 Conclusion

The findings of this systematic review suggest that PBM can be a promising non-pharmacological intervention for MS, as it has been shown to modulate markers linked to inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Clinically, PBM has been associated with improvements in motor, sensorial, and cognitive functions in MS patients, indicating its potential as an adjunct therapy to standard MS treatments. No study presented adverse effects of PBM. However, future studies should aim to standardize PBM protocols, assess long-term effects, explore underlying mechanisms, investigate synergistic effects with other treatments, and identify patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit from PBM.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

VO: Writing – original draft. MA: Writing – original draft. FG-L: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Sérgio Gomes da Silva was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; # 301771/2022-7).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Hospital do Câncer de Muriaé for their technical assistance and support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Compston, A, and Coles, A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. (2008) 372:1502–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sospedra, M, and Martin, R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. (2005) 23:683–747. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115707

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Williamson, DM, Noonan, CW, Henry, JP, Wagner, L, Indian, R, Lynch, SG, et al. Peer reviewed: the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in 3 US communities. Prev Chronic Dis. (2010) 7:1–8.

Google Scholar

4. Browne, P, Chandraratna, D, Angood, C, Tremlett, H, Baker, C, Taylor, BV, et al. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology. (2014) 83:1022–4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Dobson, R, and Giovannoni, G. Multiple sclerosis–a review. Eur J Neurol. (2019) 26:27–40. doi: 10.1111/ene.13819

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Karussis, D . The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review. J Autoimmun. (2014) 48-49:134–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.022

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Peterson, JW, Bö, L, Mörk, S, Chang, A, and Trapp, BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol. (2001) 50:389–400. doi: 10.1002/ana.1123

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lublin, FD, and Reingold, SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology. (1996) 46:907–11. doi: 10.1212/WNL.46.4.907

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lublin, FD, Reingold, SC, Cohen, JA, Cutter, GR, Sørensen, PS, Thompson, AJ, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. (2014) 83:278–86. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000560

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hauser, SL, and Cree, BA. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med. (2020) 133:1380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chung, H, Dai, T, Sharma, SK, Huang, YY, Carroll, JD, and Hamblin, MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. (2012) 40:516–33. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Barrett, DW, and Gonzalez-Lima, F. Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans. Neuroscience. (2013) 230:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.016

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Blanco, NJ, Maddox, WT, and Gonzalez-Lima, F. Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation. J Neuropsychol. (2017) 11:14–25. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12074

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Disner, SG, Beevers, CG, and Gonzalez-Lima, F. Transcranial laser stimulation as neuroenhancement for attention bias modification in adults with elevated depression symptoms. Brain Stimul. (2016) 9:780–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vargas, E, Barrett, DW, Saucedo, CL, Huang, LD, Abraham, JA, Tanaka, H, et al. Beneficial neurocognitive effects of transcranial laser in older adults. Lasers Med Sci. (2017) 32:1153–62. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2221-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cardoso, FDS, Mansur, FCB, Araújo, BHS, Gonzalez-Lima, F, and Gomes da Silva, S. Photobiomodulation improves the inflammatory response and intracellular signaling proteins linked to vascular function and cell survival in the brain of aged rats. Mol Neurobiol. (2022) 59:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02606-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Cardoso, FDS, Dos Santos, JCC, Gonzalez-Lima, F, Araújo, BHS, Lopes-Martins, RÁB, and Gomes da Silva, S. Effects of chronic photobiomodulation with transcranial near-infrared laser on brain metabolomics of young and aged rats. Mol Neurobiol. (2021) 58:2256–68. doi: 10.1007/s12035-020-02247-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Salehpour, F, Farajdokht, F, Erfani, M, Sadigh-Eteghad, S, Shotorbani, SS, Hamblin, MR, et al. Transcranial near-infrared photobiomodulation attenuates memory impairment and hippocampal oxidative stress in sleep-deprived mice. Brain Res. (2018) 1682:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.040

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Dompe, C, Moncrieff, L, Matys, J, Grzech-Leśniak, K, Kocherova, I, Bryja, A, et al. Photobiomodulation—underlying mechanism and clinical applications. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:1724. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061724

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hamblin, MR . Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophys. (2017) 4:337. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Cho, GM, Lee, SY, Park, JH, Kim, MJ, Park, KJ, Choi, BT, et al. Photobiomodulation using a low-level light-emitting diode improves cognitive dysfunction in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol Ser A. (2020) 75:631–9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly240

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Khuman, J, Zhang, J, Park, J, Carroll, JD, Donahue, C, and Whalen, MJ. Low-level laser light therapy improves cognitive deficits and inhibits microglial activation after controlled cortical impact in mice. J Neurotrauma. (2012) 29:408–17. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1745

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. O’Brien, JA, and Austin, PJ. Effect of photobiomodulation in rescuing lipopolysaccharide-induced dopaminergic cell loss in the male Sprague–Dawley rat. Biomol Ther. (2019) 9:381. doi: 10.3390/biom9080381

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Yang, L, Dong, Y, Wu, C, Youngblood, H, Li, Y, Zong, X, et al. Effects of prenatal photobiomodulation treatment on neonatal hypoxic ischemia in rat offspring. Theranostics. (2021) 11:1269. doi: 10.7150/thno.49672

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, and Altman, DGPRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 151:264–9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wright, RW, Brand, RA, Dunn, W, and Spindler, KP. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2007) 455:23–9. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802c9098

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Duarte, KCN, Soares, TT, Magri, AMP, Garcia, LA, Le Sueur-Maluf, L, Renno, ACM, et al. Low-level laser therapy modulates demyelination in mice. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. (2018) 189:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.09.024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Goncalves, ED, Souza, PS, Lieberknecht, V, Fidelis, GS, Barbosa, RI, Silveira, PC, et al. Low-level laser therapy ameliorates disease progression in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmunity. (2016) 49:132–42. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2015.1124425

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Muili, KA, Gopalakrishnan, S, Meyer, SL, Eells, JT, and Lyons, JA. Amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in C57BL/6 mice by photobiomodulation induced by 670 nm light. PLoS One. (2012) 7:e30655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030655

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Muili, KA, Gopalakrishnan, S, Eells, JT, and Lyons, JA. Photobiomodulation induced by 670 nm light ameliorates MOG35-55 induced EAE in female C57BL/6 mice: a role for remediation of nitrosative stress. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e67358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067358

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kubsik, A, Klimkiewicz, R, Janczewska, K, Klimkiewicz, P, Jankowska, A, and Woldańska-Okońska, M. Application of laser radiation and magnetostimulation in therapy of patients with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation. (2016) 38:183–90. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161309

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rouhani, M, Tolentino, M, Lyons, JA, and Ng, AV. Effects of photobiomodulation therapy on muscle function in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2024) 86:105598. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105598

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Seada, YI, Nofel, R, and Sayed, HM. Comparison between trans-cranial electromagnetic stimulation and low-level laser on modulation of trigeminal neuralgia. J Phys Ther Sci. (2013) 25:911–4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.911

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Silva, T, Fragoso, YD, Destro Rodrigues, MFS, Gomes, AO, da Silva, FC, Andreo, L, et al. Effects of photobiomodulation on interleukin-10 and nitrites in individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis–randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0230551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230551

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Constantinescu, CS, Farooqi, N, O'Brien, K, and Gran, B. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol. (2011) 164:1079–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01302.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Denic, A, Johnson, AJ, Bieber, AJ, Warrington, AE, Rodriguez, M, and Pirko, I. The relevance of animal models in multiple sclerosis research. Pathophysiology. (2011) 18:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2010.04.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Oveland, E, Ahmad, I, Lereim, RR, Kroksveen, AC, Barsnes, H, Guldbrandsen, A, et al. Cuprizone and EAE mouse frontal cortex proteomics revealed proteins altered in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:7174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86191-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sen, MK, Mahns, DA, Coorssen, JR, and Shortland, PJ. The roles of microglia and astrocytes in phagocytosis and myelination: insights from the cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis. Glia. (2022) 70:1215–50. doi: 10.1002/glia.24148

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Thompson, AJ, Banwell, BL, Barkhof, F, Carroll, WM, Coetzee, T, Comi, G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:162–73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Molina-Holgado, E, Arévalo-Martín, A, Castrillo, A, Boscá, L, Vela, JM, and Guaza, C. Interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 modulate nuclear factor κB activity and nitric oxide synthase-2 expression in Theiler's virus-infected brain astrocytes. J Neurochem. (2002) 81:1242–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00925.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Kwilasz, AJ, Grace, PM, Serbedzija, P, Maier, SF, and Watkins, LR. The therapeutic potential of interleukin-10 in neuroimmune diseases. Neuropharmacology. (2015) 96:55–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.10.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Caminero, A, Comabella, M, and Montalban, X. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), anti-TNF-α and demyelination revisited: an ongoing story. J Neuroimmunol. (2011) 234:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.03.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Benveniste, EN . Role of macrophages/microglia in multiple sclerosis and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Mol Med. (1997) 75:165–73. doi: 10.1007/s001090050101

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Axelsson, M, Malmeström, C, Nilsson, S, Haghighi, S, Rosengren, L, and Lycke, J. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: a potential biomarker for progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. (2011) 258:882–8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5863-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Malmestrom, C, Haghighi, S, Rosengren, L, Andersen, O, and Lycke, J. Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS. Neurology. (2003) 61:1720–5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000098880.19793.b6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Rosengren, LE, Lycke, J, and Andersen, O. Glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF of multiple sclerosis patients: relation to neurological deficit. J Neurol Sci. (1995) 133:61–5. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(95)00152-r

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Escribano, BM, Medina-Fernández, FJ, Aguilar-Luque, M, Agüera, E, Feijoo, M, Garcia-Maceira, FI, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein and oxidative stress in a multiple sclerosis model. Neurotherapeutics. (2017) 14:199–211. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0480-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Namazi, F, Bordbar, E, Bakhshaei, F, and Nazifi, S. The effect of Urtica dioica extract on oxidative stress, heat shock proteins, and brain histopathology in multiple sclerosis model. Physiol Rep. (2022) 10:e15404. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15404

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Van Horssen, J, Schreibelt, G, Drexhage, J, Hazes, T, Dijkstra, CD, Van der Valk, P, et al. Severe oxidative damage in multiple sclerosis lesions coincides with enhanced antioxidant enzyme expression. Free Radic Biol Med. (2008) 45:1729–37. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Cross, AH, Misko, TP, Lin, RF, Hickey, WF, Trotter, JL, and Tilton, RG. Aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL mice. J Clin Invest. (1994) 93:2684–90. doi: 10.1172/JCI117282

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Das, A, Guyton, MK, Matzelle, DD, Ray, SK, and Banik, NL. Time-dependent increases in protease activities for neuronal apoptosis in spinal cords of Lewis rats during development of acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neurosci Res. (2008) 86:2992–3001. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21737

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Qi, X, Lewin, AS, Sun, L, Hauswirth, WW, and Guy, J. Suppression of mitochondrial oxidative stress provides long-term neuroprotection in experimental optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2007) 48:681–91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0553

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: photobiomodulation, low-level laser therapy, multiple sclerosis, autoimmune encephalomyelitis, demyelination

Citation: Oliveira de Andrade Filho V, Amarante MOC, Gonzalez-Lima F, Gomes da Silva S and Cardoso FdS (2024) Systematic review of photobiomodulation for multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 15:1465621. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1465621

Received: 16 July 2024; Accepted: 30 August 2024;
Published: 12 September 2024.

Edited by:

Eleonora Tavazzi, University at Buffalo, United States

Reviewed by:

Carlos Matute, University of the Basque Country, Spain
Oscar Kurt Bitzer Quintero, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente (CIBO), Mexico

Copyright © 2024 Oliveira de Andrade Filho, Amarante, Gonzalez-Lima, Gomes da Silva and Cardoso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fabrízio dos Santos Cardoso, fabrizioscardoso@yahoo.com.br

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.