SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1509668
This article is part of the Research TopicClinical imaging, neurophysiological, neuropathology and neuroethics studies on disorders of consciousness, coma mechanisms, and theories of consciousness: a unifying attemptView all 6 articles
Thalamus and consciousness: A systematic review on thalamic nuclei associated with consciousness
Provisionally accepted- 1IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
- 2Bonino Pulejo Neurology Center (IRCCS), Messina, Italy
- 3IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna (ISNB), Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
- 4Sant'Anna Crotone Institute, Crotone, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Consciousness relies on both cortical and subcortical structures and their feedforward and feedback pathways. Within this framework, the thalamus represents a relay station enabling the transmission, reception, and integration of information. However, it is divided into several nuclear groups each composed of functionally heterogeneous nuclei, and, to date, an agreement on which nuclei are most involved in the generation, maintenance, and modulation of consciousness is still lacking.Methods: To fill this gap, we performed a systematic review by querying 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cinahl Complete) about studies published in the last 20 years exploring the relationship between specific thalamic nuclei/nuclear groups and consciousness. For each included study, we extracted data supporting (i.e., positive evidence) or not (i.e., negative evidence) the relationship between a specific nucleus/nuclear group and the consciousness.Results: 167 articles were included leading to 346 pieces of evidence of which 284 were positive. Most of the retrieved positive evidence pertained to the intralaminar nuclear group, followed by the mediodorsal and ventral nuclear groups. Furthermore, when considering the specific nuclei within the intralaminar nuclear group, results highlighted the centromedian-parafascicular complex (CM-Pf) as the nucleus most related to consciousness. Despite the high heterogeneity characterizing the adopted methodologies (e.g., brain stimulation, anesthesia, brain damage), as well as the study population (e.g., either healthy and pathological humans or animals) across studies, the greatest amount of evidence supported a key role of CM-Pf for the generation, modulation, and maintenance of the level of consciousness.Discussion: Though there is more research on the role of intralaminar nuclei, there is proportionally more positive evidence supporting these nuclei (particularly the CM-Pf) as key nodes in the network underlying consciousness compared to other thalamic nuclei. These results support ongoing therapeutic approaches to disorders of consciousness by reinforcing the rationale behind brain stimulation targeting CM-Pf and paving the way for other potential candidates for targeted interventions.
Keywords: Thalamus, Consciousness, Centromedian-parafascicular, Neuromodulation, Arousal, Wakefulness, Disorders of Consciousness (Min.5-Max. 8
Received: 11 Oct 2024; Accepted: 26 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cacciatore, Magnani, Barbadoro, Ippoliti, Stanziano, Clementi, Nigri, Nanetti, Marino, La Porta, Lucca, Prada and Leonardi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Francesca Giulia Magnani, IRCCS Carlo Besta Neurological Institute Foundation, Milan, 20133, Lombardy, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.