Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Applied Neuroimaging

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534844

Correlation of breathing task derived cerebrovascular reactivity with baseline CBF, OEF and CMRO2

Provisionally accepted
Ke  ZhangKe Zhang1*Simon  M.F. TriphanSimon M.F. Triphan1Mark  O. WielpützMark O. Wielpütz1Johan  JendeJohan Jende2Emilie  SleightEmilie Sleight3Christian  Herbert ZienerChristian Herbert Ziener2Mark  E. LaddMark E. Ladd2Heinz-Peter  SchlemmerHeinz-Peter Schlemmer2Hans-Ulrich  KauczorHans-Ulrich Kauczor1Oliver  SedlaczekOliver Sedlaczek1Felix  T. KurzFelix T. Kurz4
  • 1Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 3Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
  • 4University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Rationale and Objectives: Only a few studies examined the correlation between cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and other physiological parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF), oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2). In this study, these baseline parameters were measured using 3D MRI with whole brain coverage for the investigation of global and regional correlation between each other to enhance understanding of brain function and improve tumor diagnosis. Materials and Methods: All measurement were performed at 3T. CVR was derived from a breath-holding task. Baseline CBF was measured by pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Baseline OEF was measured with a gradient-echo sampling of spin-echo pulse sequence. T1 weighted anatomical image (T1W) was measured using MPRAGE sequence. CVR was calculated using customized written programs. CBF was quantified by using ASLtbx. For OEF analysis, a feedforward artificial neural network was used. CMRO2 was calculated based on smoothed and normalized CBF and OEF. General linear regression analysis was used to examine the relations between CVR and other parameters in five lobes of gray matter including frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital and insula lobes in individual healthy subjects. Spearman correlation was performed to check the regional correlations in an Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas. Results: 15 healthy volunteers and five patients with brain tumors were included. In the healthy subjects, five lobes had a positive correlation between CBF and CVR (p<0.05). Similarly, in five lobes positive correlations between CMRO2 and CVR were found (p<0.05), as well as significant inter-and intra-subject correlations (p<0.001). However, there were no significant correlations between OEF and other parameters. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that CVR is strongly associated with CBF and CMRO₂ at both global and regional levels in healthy brains, but not with OEF. These results provide new insight into the complex interplay between vascular reactivity, perfusion, and metabolism and underscore the potential of combined CVR-CBF-CMRO₂ imaging for assessing brain health and pathology.

Keywords: cerebrovascular reactivity, cerebral blood flow, oxygen extractionfraction, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen, Correlatianship

Received: 28 Nov 2024; Accepted: 26 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Triphan, Wielpütz, Jende, Sleight, Ziener, Ladd, Schlemmer, Kauczor, Sedlaczek and Kurz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ke Zhang, ke.zhang@uni-heidelberg.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.