ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Stroke
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1550539
This article is part of the Research TopicQuality of Stroke Care: What Could Be Improved, and How? - Volume IIView all 10 articles
The Lithuanian Stroke Database: selection of national stroke care performance measures
Provisionally accepted- 1Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- 2Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- 3Department of Neurology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- 4Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Neuroscience, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga, Lithuania
- 5Klaipėda University Hospital, Klaipėda, Lithuania
- 6Department of Neurology, Republican Panevėžys Hospital, Panevėžys, Lithuania
- 7Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- 8State Data Agency, Vilnius, Lithuania
- 9Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The Lithuanian Stroke Database (StrokeLT) aims to automate data collection and key performance indicator (KPI) monitoring across all stroke-ready hospitals, addressing the limitations of manual processes and facilitating evidence-based improvements in stroke care nationwide. This publication outlines the selection process and target values of the KPIs designed to standardise and enhance stroke care quality in Lithuania.The database will include all adult patients diagnosed with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), admitted to Lithuanian stroke-ready hospitals, encompassing approximately 9,582 annual stroke and 1,899 TIA admissions based on 2023 data. The database will ensure comprehensive national coverage by integrating data from stroke centres via a centralised electronic health record system.Main variables: A total of 52 KPIs were selected through a multi-stage Delphi process involving national experts and guided by international standards. These KPIs include 44 process metrics, such as timeliness metrics, early rehabilitation, and availability of secondary prevention, as well as 8 outcome metrics, including functional recovery, completion of a patient feedback survey and mortality. This framework enables comprehensive monitoring across all stages of patient care, as well as incorporating valuable patient feedback.The Lithuanian Stroke Database establishes a standardised automated framework for monitoring stroke care using 52 KPIs, selected through a multi-stage Delphi process involving all relevant stakeholders.
Keywords: Stroke, Quality Improvement, Stroke database, Performance measures, stroke key performance indicators
Received: 23 Dec 2024; Accepted: 12 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dapkute, Trinkūnas, Rastenyte, Matijošaitis, Taroza, Jatuzis, Baužaitė-Babušienė, Vilionskis, Klimašauskas, Juodakis, Jaramavičius and Masiliūnas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rytis Masiliūnas, Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.