Abstract
Background:
Stroke patients often experience sequelae such as depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment, and abnormal physical function. Exercise intervention may be an effective and safe non-drug treatment to address these health issues.
Objective:
The aim of this meta-analytical review was to explore the effects of exercise intervention programs on depressive symptoms, cognitive function, physical function, and quality of life in stroke patients, as well as to identify appropriate exercise programs.
Methods:
Seven databases were searched from the libraryās construction until 30 August 2024. A meta-analysis was performed, and the risk of bias was assessed using Review Manager 5.4. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software, and the overall certainty of the evidence was rated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methods.
Results:
A total of 11,607 studies were identified. Among these, 20 studies, which included 1,848 patients, were considered eligible for this network meta-analysis. Compared to the control group, exercise significantly improved cognitive function (standard mean difference [SMD]āÆ=āÆ1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]āÆ=āÆ0.40ā1.75, pāÆ=āÆ0.002), physical balance ability (mean difference [MD]āÆ=āÆ0.80, 95% CIāÆ=āÆ0.23ā1.37, pāÆ<āÆ0.01), physical walking ability (MDāÆ=āÆ48.39, 95% CIāÆ=āÆ8.06ā88.72, pāÆ=āÆ0.02), and quality of life. However, exercise had no significant effect on depressive symptoms (SMDāÆ=āÆā0.2, 95% CIāÆ=āÆā0.46ā0.05, pāÆ=āÆ0.11). A subgroup analysis indicated that a longer duration of exercise (> 3āÆmonths) can effectively improve depressive symptoms in stroke patients.
Conclusion:
The results indicated that cognitive function, balance, walking speed, and quality of life of stroke patients improved following exercise intervention, and longer exercise duration (> 3āÆmonths) contributed to alleviating the depressive symptoms of stroke patients. Therefore, we recommend that stroke patients engage in physical exercise 3 times a week for 1āÆh each session. The exercise duration should continue for at least 3āÆmonths to ensure the best therapeutic effect. Furthermore, determining exercise intensity should be a personalized processācarefully customized to align with the physical capabilities and limitations of each patient.
Systematic review registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, CRD42024520778.
1 Introduction
Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability among adults worldwide (1), and stroke survivors are likely to experience long-term neurological complications (2). Stroke patients are more likely to develop depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment, and physical movement disorder after surgery; these complications adversely affect the quality of life, survival rates, and functional recovery of stroke patients (3ā5).
One of the most prevalent long-term effects of stroke is post-stroke depression (PSD), which affects 11ā41% of stroke survivors worldwide and is associated with a markedly higher risk of death. According to the depression scale, approximately 50% of stroke patients have PSD (6, 7). Up to one-third of stroke survivors may experience the severe consequences of cognitive impairment, which frequently follows a stroke (8). Research shows that stroke survivors with mild cognitive impairment face a twofold increased risk of death (9). Hemiplegia affects over 85% of stroke patients, leading to impaired upper limb function and decreased motor ability (10). This impairment significantly impacts balance and the extent of daily and social activities (11). National and international stroke treatment guidelines rarely emphasize the most effective clinical prevention and treatment strategies for stroke survivors (12). Currently, medication and psychotherapy are the standard treatments; however, these do not significantly enhance physical function and quality of life (13, 14).
There is a wealth of evidence supporting the protective role of exercise in cognitive and depressive disorders after stroke. Exercise intervention offers multiple benefits and effects that may enhance the cognitive function following a stroke (15), recovery of arm function, improvement of balance index and gait speed, and improvement of physical function and quality of life. Cognitive and depressive disorders have been shown to benefit from exercises (12, 16ā18). Research shows that exercise can improve cardiovascular fitness, elevate blood levels of adrenaline and brain-derived neurotrophic factors, and positively supervise brain function, including growth factors, brain metabolism, neurotransmitters, oxygen availability, glucose regulation, and oxidative stress. These processes can enhance both depression and cognitive function (19). Although the efficacy of exercise in managing stroke sequelae is well established, research findings regarding the doseāresponse relationship of exercise in stroke patients remain inconsistent. Current literature offers limited guidance on the best exercise parameters for treating stroke-related impairments.
Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to thoroughly examine all published randomized controlled trials. The effects of post-stroke exercise on patientsā depression symptoms, cognitive function, physical function, and quality of life will be assessed to provide scientific support for future clinical practice and research.
2 Methods
2.1 Protocol and registration
This systematic review (No.: CRD42024520778) was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) in April 2024. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, along with a predefined methodology, were used for reporting this systematic review and meta-analyses.
2.2 Literature search
From the creation of the database until 30 August 2024, we conducted searches across seven databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIPC). The medical subject words related to exercise, stroke, depression, cognitive impairment, and entry terms were retrieved, and the complete retrieval strategy is shown in Supplementary material.
2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study design: randomized controlled trials; (2) study population: patients with stroke; (3) stroke patients with a scale assessment of cognitive or depressive symptoms; (4) delivery of an exercise intervention of any modality; and (5) number of participants ā„30.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) unstable medical history that could restrict participation (e.g., recent myocardial infarction); (2) simultaneously with other neurological disorders (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinsonās disease, and multiple sclerosis); and (3) studies with missing information or abstracts for which, despite contacting the authors via email, the full text was not accessible.
2.4 Data collection
To eliminate duplicate records, all of the studies found through the literature search were imported into Endnote software (Clarivate Analytics). Two researchers independently vetted the literature using the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The third reviewer resolved any disagreements by consensus or by consulting an expert. The following information was extracted: initial author, publication date, grouping technique, number of participants in each group, exercise and intervention mode, duration, outcome measures, and negative effects in both the experimental and the control groups.
2.5 Risk of bias assessment
Review Manager 5.4 software (Cochrane) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. A case-by-case assessment based on each included study included the following seven main items: (1) Random sequence generation (selection bias); (2) Allocation concealment (selection bias); (3) Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias); (4) Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias); (5) Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias); (6) Selective reporting (reporting bias); (7) Other biases; and (8) Other bias. Risk of bias was categorized as āhigh risk of bias (ā)ā āunclear (?)ā āOrā low risk of bias (+).ā
2.6 Strength of the evidence assessment
The quality of the evidence supporting the outcome was assessed using the Grading Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method of meta-analysis. Study limitations, inconsistent results, indirect outcomes, imprecise results, and publication bias were the five factors that could diminish the quality of evidence. The strength of evidence was categorized into four levels from high to low: strong, moderate, low, and very low. Since the intervention method is an exercise intervention, allocation masking and double-blinding could not be guaranteed, leading to a downgrade of all evidence by one level. If the forest plot crossed the equivalence line, or if the sample size of the included studies was too small, or the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the effect estimate was too wide, the evidence was downgraded by one level.
2.7 Statistical analysis
RevMan 5.4 was used for the evaluation of heterogeneity and merging data in this meta-analysis. Mean difference (MD) and standard mean difference (SMD) were used to represent continuous variables, whereas SMD was used to express continuous variables with distinct differences and units of measurement. I2āÆā¤ 50% was considered low heterogeneity, and the fixed effect model was used for the meta-analysis. Instead, a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed with high statistical heterogeneity.
The sensitivity analyses were performed on a case-by-case basis; pāÆ<āÆ0.05 was considered statistically significant according to the calculation of the 95% CI. The sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software (StataCorp Limited Liability Company).
3 Results
After searching seven databases, a total of 11,607 studies were retrieved. After removing duplicates, 4,656 studies remained; their titles and abstracts were reviewed to determine if they met the inclusion criteria; as a result, 4,594 studies were excluded. The remaining 62 studies were independently reviewed by two authors (YZX and LJX). When a disagreement is difficult to resolve, the third author is often used as an arbiter to help reach a consensus on the issue. We manually searched relevant published meta-analyses, and the references of the included studies, of which five studies were available for inclusion. In total, 20 studies were included. The excluded cases were those with less than 30 participants (nāÆ=āÆ9), duplicate date (nāÆ=āÆ6), study protocol (nāÆ=āÆ8), no scale score (nāÆ=āÆ15), and other methods and related results (nāÆ=āÆ9) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

PRISMA flowchart.
3.1 Characteristics of the included studies
Characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. This review only examined English-language literature and did not include studies published in other languages. The included studies, published between 2006 and 2023, enrolled 1,848 stroke patients with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 362. patients included experienced a wide range of time since their stroke, ranging from less than 1āÆmonth to more than 10āÆyears. The 20 included studies from China (nāÆ=āÆ3), the United Kingdom (nāÆ=āÆ3), the United States (nāÆ=āÆ3), the Netherlands (nāÆ=āÆ2), Sweden (nāÆ=āÆ2), Australia (nāÆ=āÆ1), Canada (nāÆ=āÆ1), Denmark (nāÆ=āÆ1), Egypt (nāÆ=āÆ1), Korea (nāÆ=āÆ1), Norway (nāÆ=āÆ1), Portugal (nāÆ=āÆ1).
Table 1
| Authors | Country | N(I/C) | Male | Female | Age | Mean age (I) | Mean age (C) | Stroke time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deijle et al. (20) | Netherlands | 60/59 | 70 | 49 | ā„18 | 64.7āÆĀ±āÆ8.9 | 63.9āÆĀ±āÆ10.6 | <1āÆmonth |
| El-Tamawy et al. (21) | Egypt | 15/15 | 21 | 9 | 48.4āÆĀ±āÆ6.39 | 48.4āÆĀ±āÆ6.39 | 49.67āÆĀ±āÆ6.98 | 3ā18āÆmonths |
| Gjellesvik et al. (22) | The United States | 36/34 | 41 | 29 | >18 | 57.6āÆĀ±āÆ9.2 | 58.7āÆĀ±āÆ9.2 | 3āÆmonths to 5āÆyears |
| Harrington et al. (23) | The United Kingdom | 124/119 | 132 | 111 | NR | 71āÆĀ±āÆ10.5 | 70āÆĀ±āÆ10.2 | NR |
| Holmgren et al. (24) | Sweden | 15/19 | 21 | 13 | NR | 77.7āÆĀ±āÆ7.6 | 79.2āÆĀ±āÆ7.5 | 3ā6āÆmonths |
| Ihle-Hansen et al. (25) | Norway | 177/185 | 219 | 143 | >18 | 71.4āÆĀ±āÆ11.3 | 72.0āÆĀ±āÆ11.3 | NR |
| Jiang et al. (26) | China | 45/45 | 55 | 35 | 40ā80 | 58.00āÆĀ±āÆ3.13 | 58.11āÆĀ±āÆ2.56 | > 12āÆweeks |
| Koch et al. (27) | The United States | 86/45 | 81 | 50 | >18 | 59āÆĀ±āÆ11 | 58āÆĀ±āÆ12 | <1āÆyear |
| Krawcyk et al. (28) | Denmark | 31/32 | 49 | 14 | >18 | 63.7āÆĀ±āÆ8.9 | 63.7āÆĀ±āÆ9.2 | <3āÆweeks |
| Lai et al. (3) | The United States | 44/49 | 50 | 43 | 69.8āÆĀ±āÆ10.3 | 70.4āÆĀ±āÆ11.3 | 68.5āÆĀ±āÆ9.0 | NR |
| Lapointe et al. (29) | Canada | 19/17 | 23 | 13 | NR | 71.8āÆĀ±āÆ9.9 | 69.6āÆĀ±āÆ10.7 | >3āÆmonths |
| Maeneja et al. (19) | Portugal | 17/17 | 19 | 15 | ā„40 | 55.12āÆĀ±āÆ6.660 | 57.00āÆĀ±āÆ10.23 | NR |
| Mead et al. (30) | The United Kingdom | 32/34 | 36 | 30 | NR | 71.7āÆĀ±āÆ9.6 | 72.0āÆĀ±āÆ10.4 | NR |
| Moore et al. (31) | The United Kingdom | 20/20 | 34 | 6 | >50 | 68āÆĀ±āÆ8 | 70āÆĀ±āÆ11 | >6āÆmonths |
| Sims et al. (32) | Australia | 23/22 | 27 | 18 | 67.13āÆĀ±āÆ15.23 | 67.95āÆĀ±āÆ14.76 | 66.27āÆĀ±āÆ16.01 | 13.2āÆmonths (SD 4.95) |
| Song et al. (33) | Korea | 18/16 | 21 | 13 | NR | 58.72āÆĀ±āÆ17.13 | 57.18āÆĀ±āÆ10.65 | NR |
| Vahlberg et al. (4) | Sweden | 34/33 | 51 | 16 | 65ā85 | 73.7āÆĀ±āÆ5.3 | 72.6āÆĀ±āÆ5.5 | 1ā3āÆyears |
| Zedlitz et al. (34) | Netherlands | 38/45 | 43 | 40 | 18ā70 | 54.8āÆĀ±āÆ9.1 | 55.6āÆĀ±āÆ8.8 | ā„4āÆmonths |
| Zhao et al. (35) | China | 80/80 | 81 | 79 | 62.98āÆĀ±āÆ12.85 | 62.21āÆĀ±āÆ12.88 | 63.35āÆĀ±āÆ12.90 | 1.5āÆmonths |
| Zheng et al. (36) | China | 24/24 | 41 | 7 | 45ā75 | 61.63āÆĀ±āÆ9.21 | 62.75āÆĀ±āÆ6.41 | >3āÆmonths |
Characteristics of the included studies.
3.2 Intervention characteristics
Regarding the types of exercise included in the intervention group, five studies were multicomponent exercises with three or more types (balance, cognitive, endurance, resistance, strength, and walking), three studies focused on aerobic exercises, three studies used combined aerobic and other exercises, three studies used traditional Chinese medicine exercises, two studies used high-intensity interval training (HIIT), two studies used progressive exercises, and two studies did not specify the type of exercise. The exercise intervention occurred 2 or 3 times each week. The control group intervention included conventional nursing, rehabilitation, health education, gentle stretching, cognitive therapy, and attention management. The characteristics of the interventions in the included studies are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2
| Authors | Intervention type | Frequency | Duration | Intensity | Control | Time points assessed | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deijle et al. (20) | Aerobic and strength training | Aerobic:2/week, strength: 3/week | 12āÆweeks | 1āÆh | Standard care | Baseline, 12āÆmonths, 24āÆmonths | MOCA\HADS |
| El-Tamawy et al. (21) | Aerobic exercise | 3/week | 8āÆweeks | 40ā45āÆmin | Physiotherapy program | Baseline, 8āÆweeks | ACER |
| Gjellesvik et al. (22) | HIIT | 3/week | 8āÆweeks | NR | Standard care | 3āÆmonths, 6āÆmonths, 10āÆmonths | 6MWT\BBS\HADS\MoCA\SIS\ |
| Harrington et al. (23) | Mixed exercise intervention | 2/week | 8āÆweeks | 1āÆh | Standard care | Baseline, 9āÆweeks, 16āÆweeks | WHOQoL-Bref\HADS |
| Holmgren et al. (24) | Physical exercise | 7/week | 5āÆweeks | 1āÆh | Educational discussion | Baseline, 5āÆweeks, 3āÆmonths, 6āÆmonths | GDS-15\SF-36\HRQoL |
| Ihle-Hansen et al. (25) | Physical exercise | 2-3/week | 18āÆmonths | 30āÆmin | Usual care | Baseline, 18āÆmonths | HADS\MMSE |
| Jiang et al. (26) | Aerobic exercise | NR | 6āÆmonths | 25āÆmin | Health education and rehabilitation training | Baseline, 6āÆmonths | MOCA\SS-QOL |
| Koch et al. (27) | Aerobic and resistance training | 3/week | 12āÆweeks | 100āÆmin | Mild stretching and range-of-motion exercises | Baseline, 3āÆmonths | MOCA\CES-D\SIS\6MWT |
| Krawcyk et al. (28) | HIIT | 5/week | 12āÆweeks | 3āÆĆāÆ3āÆmin | Usual care | Baseline, 3āÆmonths | MoCA |
| Lai et al. (3) | Progressive exercise | 3/week | 3āÆmonths | NR | Usual care | Baseline, 3āÆmonths, 9āÆmonths, | GDS-15\BBS\SIS\SF-36 |
| Lapointe et al. (29) | Aerobic exercise and HIIT | 3/week | 6āÆmonths | 30āÆmin | Usual care | Baseline, 6āÆmonths, 12āÆmonths | MOCA |
| Maeneja et al. (19) | Aerobic physical exercise | 3/week | 12āÆweeks | 60āÆmin | Walking and cognitive tasks | Baseline, 12āÆweeks | MMSE |
| Mead et al. (30) | Mixed exercise intervention | 3/week | 12āÆweeks | 75āÆmin | Seated relaxation | Baseline, 3āÆmonths, 7āÆmonths, | SF-36\HADS |
| Moore et al. (31) | Mixed exercise intervention | 3/week | 19āÆweeks | 45ā60āÆmin | Home stretching program | Baseline, 20āÆweeks | 6MWT\BBS\ACE-R\SIS |
| Sims et al. (32) | Progressive exercise | 2/week | 10āÆweeks | NR | Usual care | Baseline, 10āÆweeks, 6āÆmonths | CES-D\SF-12\AQOL |
| Song et al. (33) | Tai Chi | 2/week | 6āÆmonths | 50āÆmin | Symptom management program |
Baseline, 3āÆmonths, 6āÆmonths | K-MOCA\K-MMSE\BBS\ADL\SS-QOL |
| Vahlberg et al. (4) | Mixed exercise intervention | 2/week | 3āÆmonths | 75āÆmin | Regular activities | Baseline, 3āÆmonths, 6āÆmonths, 15āÆmonths | BBS\6MWT\EQ-5D\GDS-20 |
| Zedlitz et al. (34) | Mixed exercise intervention | 2/week | 12āÆweeks | 2āÆh | Cognitive therapy | Baseline, 12āÆweeks, 6āÆmonths | HADS\6MWT\SA-SIP |
| Zhao et al. (35) | Tai Chi | NR | 12āÆweeks | 30āÆmin | Attention control group | Baseline, 1āÆweeks, 8āÆweeks, 12āÆweeks, 16āÆweeks | BBS\ADL\GDS-SF\NIHSS\QOL\SSQOL |
| Zheng et al. (36) | Baduanjin | 3/week | 24āÆweeks | 40āÆmin | Routine medical or rehabilitative treatment | Baseline, 8āÆweeks, 16āÆweeks, 24āÆweeks, 28āÆweeks | MoCA\ADL |
Intervention characteristics of the included studies.
3.3 Risk-of-bias assessment
The results of the risk of bias assessment are summarized as depicted in Figure 2. The percentages of studies with low, unclear and high risk of bias were as follows: random sequence generation (100, 0, and 0%, respectively); allocation concealment (60, 35, and 5%, respectively); blinding of participants and personnel (10, 20, and 70%, respectively); blinding of outcome assessors (55, 25, and 20, respectively); incomplete outcome (100, 0, and 0%, respectively), selective outcome reporting (90, 0, and 10, respectively), and other bias (80, 5, and 15%, respectively). Detailed information regarding the risk of bias for the included studies is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary.
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph.
3.4 Meta-analysis findings: effects of exercise intervention
Among the 20 studies, we were interested in outcomes including depressive symptoms, cognitive function, physical function, and quality of life. The analysis considered various exercise times and detection scales of these two aspects. The exercise time was divided into two stages: longer than 3āÆweeks and less than or equal to 3āÆweeks. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Hamilton Scale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) were among the instruments used to assess depressive symptoms. Cognition was measured using the Addenbrookeās Cognitive ExaminationāRevised (ACE-R), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The physical function was evaluated using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The following is our analysis of each result.
3.4.1 Depression symptoms after stroke
Twelve research studies examined how exercise therapies affected stroke patientsā depressed symptoms (3, 4, 20ā29). Due to study heterogeneity (pāÆ<āÆ0.01, I2āÆ=āÆ77%), SMD and a random effects model were employed. Following the exercise intervention, the meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in depressive symptoms (pāÆ=āÆ0.11, SMDāÆ=āÆā0.2, 95% CIāÆ=āÆā0.46ā0.05; Figure 4).
Figure 4

Effect of the exercise intervention on depressive symptoms.
The impact of exercise intervention on depression symptoms in stroke patients was highly heterogeneous. There may be hidden variables impacting this result. Therefore, we performed subgroup analysis using various scales and exercise intervention times. As shown in Figure 5, subgroup analysis based on exercise time showed significant differences among subgroups (pāÆ<āÆ0.01). Exercise intervention time above 3āÆmonths was significantly different for depressive symptoms (SMDāÆ=āÆā0.8, 95% CIāÆ=āÆā1.02ā0.58, pāÆ<āÆ0.01, I2āÆ=āÆ0%), instead, when exercise intervention time was 3āÆmonths, there was no significant effect (SMDāÆ=āÆā0.06, 95% CIāÆ=āÆā0.24ā0.12, pāÆ=āÆ0.50, I2āÆ=āÆ38%). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the detection scale, with no significant difference between the subgroups (pāÆ=āÆ0.49, I2āÆ=āÆ0%; Figure 6).
Figure 5

Effect of different motor durations on depressive symptoms.
Figure 6

Effect of different detection tools on depressive symptoms.
3.4.2 Cognitive function after stroke
The effects of exercise interventions on the cognitive function of stroke patients were documented in 11 research studies (19ā21, 23ā25, 30ā34). Similar to the study by Song et al. (33) in which the authors tested two scales, we divided it into two parts for the meta-analysis. SMD was selected as the effect size combination in a random effects model due to study heterogeneity (pāÆ<āÆ0.01, I2āÆ=āÆ95%). The meta-analysis showed that cognitive performance improved after exercise intervention (pāÆ=āÆ0.002, SMDāÆ=āÆ1.08, 95% CIāÆ=āÆ0.40ā1.75; Figure 7).
Figure 7

Effect of the exercise intervention on cognitive function.
There was heterogeneity among the groups, indicating that underlying factors might have an impact on how exercise interventions affect stroke patientsā cognitive function. Because the included studies involved different exercise intervention times and a variety of different instrumental tests, we performed a subgroup analysis of these two variables. Subgroup analysis based on exercise duration, with no significant differences between the subgroups (pāÆ=āÆ0.08, I2āÆ=āÆ68.1%; Figure 8). Subgroup analysis was carried out using the detection scale, with no significant differences between the subgroups (pāÆ=āÆ0.41, I2āÆ=āÆ0%; Figure 9).
Figure 8

Effect of different motor durations on cognitive function.
Figure 9

Effect of different detection tools on cognitive function.
3.4.3 Physical function after stroke
3.4.3.1 BBS
The BBS was used to balance body dynamics with static balance, and it included 14 items with a total score of 56. Six studies reported the impact of exercise intervention on stroke patientsā balance, and the mean difference technique was used to assess each study (3, 4, 21, 29, 32, 33). The fixed-effect model was selected because of the low heterogeneity among the six studies (pāÆ=āÆ0.19, I2āÆ=āÆ33%). The results demonstrated that the experimental groupās equilibrium function was greater than the control groupās and that the difference was statistically significant (MDāÆ=āÆ0.80, 95% CIāÆ=āÆ0.23āÆ~āÆ1.37, pāÆ<āÆ0.01, Figure 10).
Figure 10

Effect of the exercise intervention on BBS.
3.4.3.2 6MWT
The 6MWT is a valid tool for assessing physical endurance to record the total walking distance in meters over 6āÆmin. Five studies examined how exercise interventions affected stroke patientsā 6MWT scores (4, 21, 24, 28, 32). With heterogeneity between studies (pāÆ=āÆ0.11, I2āÆ=āÆ65%), a random-effects model was selected. By excluding the literature, one by one, we found that Vahlberg et al. (4) had a great impact on heterogeneity. After removing Vahlberg et al. (4), heterogeneity decreased (pāÆ=āÆ0.02, I2āÆ=āÆ42%). There was a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groupsā walking distances (MDāÆ=āÆ48.39, 95% CIāÆ=āÆ8.06ā88.72, pāÆ=āÆ0.02, Figure 11).
Figure 11

Effect of the exercise intervention on 6MWT.
3.4.4 Quality of life after stroke
A total of 12 studies included at least one measure of quality of life, and 3 studies included 2 measures (27, 29, 33). Due to substantial differences in outcome evaluation indicators across various scales that assess quality of life, a meta-analysis could not be conducted; consequently, the results were described statistically. One study used EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), revealing any significance between-group changes at follow-up (4). Five studies reported the results of the evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), and three of them reported that exercise improves patientsā quality of life, including their ability to regain their emotional and cognitive capacities (3, 27, 32). At the same time, 2 reported that the groups did not differ significantly on the SIS scale for the remaining outcome variables in the exercise and non-exercise groups (21, 24). Three studies reported the results of the evaluation of the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QOL) (29, 31, 33), and 3 studies reported the results of the evaluation of the Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL) (29, 33, 34), these studies collectively indicated that exercise could enhance the quality of life of patients. Three studies reported the evaluation results of the Short Form Survey Scale (SF) (22, 26, 27). One article showed the beneficial effects of exercise (26), and two studies did not show a favorable effect on the evaluation of the SF scale (22, 27). One article reported the Assessment of Quality of Life (A-QOL), and one article reported the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL). According to a study, baseline group differences in AQoL, social support, recovery locus of control, and life satisfaction scores were non-existent (27). At 6āÆmonths, there was evidence that the intervention group had improved more in the psychological area of the WHOQOL-BREF (35).
3.5 Safety
Among the 20 studies, 8 studies did not describe adverse events, 12 studies described adverse events, and 9 of them had no adverse events. Adverse events occurred in three studies, and one study (36) reported one adverse event, but it was not related to the intervention. One study (26) reported fall events, and 11 of them were reported in the exercise group, but all occurred outside the exercise intervention time. One study (24) reported that the most common adverse events of exercise interventions were musculoskeletal disorders, infections, and blood pressure abnormalities.
3.6 Sensitivity analysis and publication bias
We performed a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis examining cognitive and depression scores; excluding individual studies did not change the results. Additionally, there was no discernible difference in the combined estimatesā direction or magnitude, indicating that our study was stable and reliable, as shown in Figures 12, 13.
Figure 12

Sensitivity analysis for cognition.
Figure 13

Sensitivity analysis for depression.
3.7 GRADE certainty of evidence
Although all included studies were randomized controlled trials, allocation concealment, and blinding could not be achieved due to the nature of the intervention method, which was an exercise intervention. As a result, the strength of evidence was downgraded by one level; only the strength of MoCA and BBS evidence was considered moderate. According to the results of the forest plot, some research indicators crossed the equivalent line, indicating that there was no significant difference in the effect of exercise intervention, and the strength of evidence was downgraded by one level. Therefore, the strength of evidence of 6MWT, HADS, MMSE, and GDS was considered low. The assessments were subject to inaccuracies. The strength of evidence for ACE-R was considered very low because of the small sample size and the forest plot results crossing the equivalence line. Complete GRADE assessments for all treatments are shown in Figure 14.
Figure 14

GRADE for the quality of evidence of outcome indicators.
4 Discussion
This systematic review aimed to evaluate how exercise interventions affect cognitive function, depressive symptoms, physical function, and quality of life after a stroke. The results indicated that exercise interventions could enhance the cognitive and physical functions of stroke patients. However, the results also showed that short-term exercise interventions had no significant impact on depressive symptoms. The exercise duration should be more than 3āÆmonths to effectively alleviate and improve depressive symptoms.
Exercise as a complementary therapy, to improve the stroke sequelae there is some value. There is evidence that organized sports for short-term and long-term function after stroke (37). Exercise can alter metabolism and regulate cerebrovascular control in the short term, thereby reducing stroke recurrence and improving cardiovascular and cerebrovascular health, with long-term benefits. The American Stroke Association, in a scientific statement, suggested that sports should be included in the management of stroke survivors (38). Repeated, long-term exercise can promote the production of neurons, glia, synapses, and blood vessels, and these changes favor the improvement of stroke sequelae (39ā41). Exercise interventions are complex and usually involve different durations, types, frequencies, and intensity of exercises. In patients with stroke, an appropriate exercise prescription is the foundation and guarantee of sports training. It is unclear how the treatment effect of varying exercise duration and the sensitivity of various detection scales to the results differ, even though numerous studies have examined cognitive performance and depressive symptoms in stroke patients following exercise. A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed in this study, which divided exercise duration into >3āÆmonths andāÆā¤āÆ3āÆmonths. Since different scales evaluated cognitive function and depressive symptoms, subgroup analysis was performed by evaluation scale.
Exercise intervention does not significantly improve the depressive symptoms of stroke patients. The meta-analysisās results demonstrated that there was no discernible difference in depression symptoms between detection scales. However, the subgroup meta-analysis showed that the intervention with a longer duration of >3āÆmonths was more beneficial on depressive symptoms than the intervention with a duration of ā¤3āÆmonths. Therefore, we found that exercise duration may be the influencing factor of whether depressive symptoms can be improved after exercise intervention in stroke patients. The positive impact of the right exercise duration in alleviating depressive symptoms may be associated with physiological mechanisms. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies, which demonstrated that exercise can reshape the brain structure of patients with depression (42), activate the function of pertinent brain regions (43), and motivate behavioral adaptation changes (44), thereby improving the brain neural processing of patients with depression and delaying cognitive degradation. However, the shorter exercise duration may not be sufficient to trigger these physiological responses to establish a regular physiological rhythm that can stimulate the brain to produce more neural connections and remodeling, making the effect of alleviating depression insufficiently sustained and obvious (45).
Our results demonstrate that stroke patientsā cognitive function can be enhanced by exercise intervention. However, there were differences between studies, and subgroup analyses were performed on exercise duration and detection scales. Exercise duration and detection scales did not account for the high heterogeneity in cognitive function. The high heterogeneity may have been due to other factors, including different exercise interventions and the wide variation in the timing of stroke among patients.
Improving balance is an essential goal in stroke treatment, a strong predictor of functional recovery (46) and walking capacity (47), as well as an important factor in reducing the occurrence of falls after stroke. To effectively lower the incidence of limb hemiplegia and atrophy, patients can benefit from repeated strengthening exercises that enhance muscle tension and body coordination and aid in limb rehabilitation (48). Exercise can help stroke patients get more balanced, as evidenced by the fact that the exercise groupās BBS scores were higher than that of the control group. As for walking ability, the results of 6MWT after removing Vahlberg et al. (4) revealed that the 6MWT score of the exercise group was more significant than the control group, indicating that exercise intervention can improve the walking ability of stroke patients. By comparing the research variables in the literature, we found that the population included in Vahlberg et al. (4) was older adults while there was no difference in other exercise types, frequency, cycle, and the number of participants compared with other literatures.
This research includes literature from 12 studies involving the influence of exercise intervention on the quality of life of patients with cerebral apoplexy. Nine of these studies demonstrate that exercise intervention can improve the quality of life of patients with stroke. In general, the cognitive function and physical function and increasing the quality of life of patients with cerebral apoplexy were positively correlated, improve cognitive function and body function can improve the patientās awareness and ability to adapt to the outside world, thus improving the quality of life of patients with cerebral apoplexy (49).
This study noted some heterogeneity since data from several studies were gathered for analysis. This heterogeneity can be explained by several factors, including the fact that the included studies were conducted between 2006 and 2023, that the patients came from a variety of nations, including the United States, China, Australia, and others, and that their sociocultural context may have had an impact. Furthermore, studies included patients who had strokes at various times in their lives, which would have added to the resultsā heterogeneity.
5 Future implications
This review of the results demonstrated that exercise intervention is beneficial for rehabilitating both cognitive and physical function in stroke patients. At the same time, more than 3āÆmonths of continuous exercise could help stroke patients improve depressive symptoms. Therefore, encouraging patients to engage in long-term, persistent physical activity can help prevent and reduce stroke sequelae. It is worth noting that stroke patients should be accompanied and supervised by professionals during exercise to prevent adverse events, while ensuring patient compliance and the effectiveness of the exercise. Within the studies encompassed in this review, the mean exercise duration was approximately 1āÆh, and the most common exercise frequency was 3 times per week. Notably, these findings are in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations established by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for both clinical and non-clinical groups (50). The duration of exercise was not less than 3āÆmonths. However, given the substantial variability in exercise intensity among these investigations, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the optimal exercise intensity in the current review.
6 Limitations
This system research has certain limitations: first, this study on cerebral apoplexy patients to limit time and type of stroke may affect the study results. Second, while the subgroup analysis of athletic time, the motion frequency, and dose could also lead to larger heterogeneity, which should not be ignored. Third, due to the nature of the exercise intervention, participants in the blind method are very difficult, so the subjective rating may be affected by the placebo effect. Fourth, only English literature may not be able to cover the whole range of existing research. Given these limitations, the results of this comprehensive review should be carefully explained.
7 Conclusion
The results showed that the cognitive function, balance, walking speed, and quality of life of stroke patients were improved after exercise intervention, and more prolonged exercise duration (>3āÆmonths) helped to improve the depressive symptoms of stroke patients. Consequently, we advocate that stroke patients partake in physical exercise 3 times a week for 1āÆh each time. The exercise should continue for no less than 3āÆmonths to ensure the best therapeutic effect. Moreover, the determination of exercise intensity should be a personalized process, carefully tailored to align with each patientās unique physical capabilities and limitations.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
ZY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing ā original draft. SQ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing ā review & editing. JLi: Data curation, Methodology, Writing ā original draft. CL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing ā review & editing. YL: Project administration, Software, Writing ā original draft, Writing ā review & editing. PH: Investigation, Project administration, Writing ā review & editing. JLiu: Investigation, Supervision, Writing ā review & editing. LP: Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing ā original draft, Writing ā review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the Peopleās Republic of China Funding Project: PeiLinās National Prestigious Chinese Physicians Inheritance Studio (State TCM Human Education Letter [2022] No. 75), Hebei Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Funding Project (grant No. 2024075), Hebei Natural Science Foundation (grant No. H2023423049), and postgraduate innovation funding project of Hebei University of Chinese Medicine (grant No. XCXZZBS2025035).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisherās note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1564347/full#supplementary-material
- ACE-R
Addenbrookeās Cognitive ExaminationāRevised
- ADL
Activity of Daily Living scale
- A-QOL
Assessment of Quality of Life
- BBS
Berg Balance Scale
- CES-D
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
- CNKI
Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure
- EQ-5D
EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire
- GDS
Geriatric Depression Scale
- GRADE
Grading Assessment Development, and Evaluation
- HADS
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
- HIIT
high-intensity interval training
- HRQoL
Health-related quality of life
- K-MMSE
Korean-Mini-Mental State Examination
- K-MOCA
Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- MD
Mean difference
- MMSE
Mini-Mental State Examination
- MoCA
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- 6MWT
6-Minute Walk Test
- NICE
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
- NIHSS
NIH Stroke Scale
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- PROSPERO
Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews
- PSD
post-stroke depression
- QOL
Quality of Life scale
- SA-SIP
The Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile
- SF
Survey scale
- SF-36
Physical Component Summary of the Short Form 36
- SIS
Stroke Impact Scale
- SMD
standard mean difference
- SS-QOL
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale
- VIPC
China Science and Technology Journal Database
- WHOQOL
World Health Organization Quality of Life
- WHOQOL-BREF
World Health Organization Quality of Life short version of Life
Glossary
References
1.
Williams S Glaser K Ray B . Strokes and predictors of outcomes. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. (2023) 35:1ā15. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2022.10.003
2.
Balami JS Chen RL Grunwald IQ Buchan AM . Neurological complications of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. (2011) 10:357ā71. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70313-6
3.
Lai SM Studenski S Richards L Perera S Reker D Rigler S et al . Therapeutic exercise and depressive symptoms after stroke. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2006) 54:240ā7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00573.x
4.
Vahlberg B Cederholm T Lindmark B Zetterberg L Hellstrƶm K . Short-term and long-term effects of a progressive resistance and balance exercise program in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. (2016) 39:1615ā22. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1206631
5.
Danielsson A Meirelles C Willen C Sunnerhagen KS . Physical activity in community-dwelling stroke survivors and a healthy population is not explained by motor function only. PM R. (2014) 6:139ā45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.593
6.
Bartoli F Di Brita C Crocamo C Clerici M CarrĆ G . Early post-stroke depression and mortality: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Front Psych. (2018) 9:530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00530
7.
Guo J Wang J Sun W Liu X . The advances of post-stroke depression: 2021 update. J Neurol. (2022) 269:1236ā49. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10597-4
8.
Madureira S Guerreiro M Ferro JM . Dementia and cognitive impairment three months after stroke. Eur J Neurol. (2001) 8:621ā7. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00332.x
9.
Graber M Garnier L Mohr S Delpont B Blanc-Labarre C Vergely C et al . Influence of pre-existing mild cognitive impairment and dementia on post-stroke mortality. The Dijon Stroke Registry. Neuroepidemiology. (2020) 54:490ā7. doi: 10.1159/000497614
10.
Wolf SL Catlin PA Ellis M Archer AL Morgan B Piacentino A . Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. (2001) 32:1635ā9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
11.
Dijkerman HC Ietswaart M Johnston M MacWalter RS . Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil. (2004) 18:538ā49. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr769oa
12.
Li W Luo Z Jiang J Li K Wu C . The effects of exercise intervention on cognition and motor function in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. (2023) 44:1891ā903. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06636-9
13.
Anderson CS Hackett ML House AO . Interventions for preventing depression after stroke. Cochrane database Syst Rev. (2004):Cd003689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003689.pub2
14.
Hackett ML Anderson CS House AO . Interventions for treating depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2004):Cd003437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003437.pub2.
15.
Saunders DH Greig CA Mead GE . Physical activity and exercise after stroke: review of multiple meaningful benefits. Stroke. (2014) 45:3742ā7. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004311
16.
Blumenthal JA Babyak MA Moore KA Craighead WE Herman S Khatri P et al . Effects of exercise training on older patients with major depression. Arch Intern Med. (1999) 159:2349ā56. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.19.2349
17.
Brosse AL Sheets ES Lett HS Blumenthal JA . Exercise and the treatment of clinical depression in adults: recent findings and future directions. Sports Med. (2002) 32:741ā60. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232120-00001
18.
Noetel M Sanders T Gallardo-Gómez D Taylor P Del Pozo CB van den Hoek D et al . Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. (2024) 384:e075847. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075847
19.
Maeneja R Silva CR Ferreira IS Abreu AM . Aerobic physical exercise versus dual-task cognitive walking in cognitive rehabilitation of people with stroke: a randomized clinical trial. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1258262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258262
20.
Deijle IA Hemmes R Boss HM de Melker EC van den Berg BTJ Kwakkel G et al . Effect of an exercise intervention on global cognition after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke: the move IT randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. (2022) 22:289. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02805-z
21.
El-Tamawy MS Abd-Allah F Ahmed SM Darwish MH Khalifa HA Parente R . Aerobic exercises enhance cognitive functions and brain derived neurotrophic factor in ischemic stroke patients. Neuro Rehabilitation. (2014) 34:209ā13. doi: 10.3233/nre-131020
22.
Gjellesvik TI Becker F TjĆønna AE Indredavik B Lundgaard E Solbakken H et al . Effects of high-intensity interval training after stroke (the HIIT stroke study) on physical and cognitive function: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2021) 102:1683ā91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.008
23.
Harrington R Taylor G Hollinghurst S Reed M Kay H Wood VA . A community-based exercise and education scheme for stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation. Clin Rehabil. (2010) 24:3ā15. doi: 10.1177/0269215509347437
24.
Holmgren E Gosman-Hedstrƶm G Lindstrƶm B Wester P . What is the benefit of a high-intensive exercise program on health-related quality of life and depression after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Adv Physiother. (2010) 12:125ā33. doi: 10.3109/14038196.2010.488272
25.
Ihle-Hansen H Langhammer B Lydersen S Gunnes M Indredavik B Askim T . A physical activity intervention to prevent cognitive decline after stroke: secondary results from the life after STroke study, an 18-month randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. (2019) 51:646ā51. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2588
26.
Jiang H Li H Wang Z Xia X Su Q Ma J . Effect of early cognitive training combined with aerobic exercise on quality of life and cognitive function recovery of patients with Poststroke cognitive impairment. J Healthcare Eng. (2022) 2022:9891192. doi: 10.1155/2022/9891192
27.
Koch S Tiozzo E Simonetto M Loewenstein D Wright CB Dong C et al . Randomized trial of combined aerobic, resistance, and cognitive training to improve recovery from stroke: feasibility and safety. J Am Heart Assoc. (2020) 9:e015377. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015377
28.
Krawcyk RS Vinther A Petersen NC Faber J Iversen HK Christensen T et al . Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training in patients with lacunar stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:10. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00664
29.
Lapointe T Houle J Sia YT Payette M Trudeau F . Addition of high-intensity interval training to a moderate intensity continuous training cardiovascular rehabilitation program after ischemic cerebrovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. (2023) 13:13. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.963950
30.
Mead GE Greig CA Cunningham I Lewis SJ Dinan S Saunders DH et al . Stroke: a randomized trial of exercise or relaxation. J Am Geriatr Soc. (2007) 55:892ā9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01185.x
31.
Moore SA Hallsworth K Jakovljevic DG Blamire AM He J Ford GA et al . Effects of community exercise therapy on metabolic, brain, physical, and cognitive function following stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2015) 29:623ā35. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562116
32.
Sims J Galea M Taylor N Dodd K Jespersen S Joubert L et al . Regenerate: assessing the feasibility of a strength-training program to enhance the physical and mental health of chronic post stroke patients with depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2009) 24:76ā83. doi: 10.1002/gps.2082
33.
Song R Park M Jang T Oh J Sohn MK . Effects of a tai chi-based stroke rehabilitation program on symptom clusters, physical and cognitive functions, and quality of life: a randomized feasibility study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105453
34.
Zedlitz AM Rietveld TC Geurts AC Fasotti L . Cognitive and graded activity training can alleviate persistent fatigue after stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. (2012) 43:1046ā51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632117
35.
Zhao J Chau JPC Chan AWK Meng Q Choi KC Xiang X et al . Tailored sitting tai chi program for subacute stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. (2022) 53:2192ā203. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.121.036578
36.
Zheng G Zheng Y Xiong Z Ye B Tao J Chen L . Effect of Baduanjin exercise on cognitive function in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e020954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020954
37.
Brazzelli M Saunders DH Greig CA Mead GE . Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane database. Syst Rev. (2011):Cd003316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub4
38.
Billinger SA Arena R Bernhardt J Eng JJ Franklin BA Johnson CM et al . Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2014) 45:2532ā53. doi: 10.1161/str.0000000000000022
39.
Alty J Farrow M Lawler K . Exercise and dementia prevention. Pract Neurol. (2020) 20:234ā40. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2019-002335
40.
El-Sayes J Harasym D Turco CV Locke MB Nelson AJ . Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity. Neuroscientist. (2019) 25:65ā85. doi: 10.1177/1073858418771538
41.
Ploughman M Austin MW Glynn L Corbett D . The effects of poststroke aerobic exercise on neuroplasticity: a systematic review of animal and clinical studies. Transl Stroke Res. (2015) 6:13ā28. doi: 10.1007/s12975-014-0357-7
42.
Pajonk FG Wobrock T Gruber O Scherk H Berner D Kaizl I et al . Hippocampal plasticity in response to exercise in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2010) 67:133ā43. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.193
43.
Silveira H Deslandes AC de Moraes H Mouta R Ribeiro P Piedade R et al . Effects of exercise on electroencephalographic mean frequency in depressed elderly subjects. Neuropsychobiology. (2010) 61:141ā7. doi: 10.1159/000279304
44.
Oertel-Knƶchel V Mehler P Thiel C Steinbrecher K Malchow B Tesky V et al . Effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive performance and individual psychopathology in depressive and schizophrenia patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. (2014) 264:589ā604. doi: 10.1007/s00406-014-0485-9
45.
Tang L Zhang L Liu Y Li Y Yang L Zou M et al . Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve depressive symptoms in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. (2024) 24:505. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05118-7
46.
Tyson SF Hanley M Chillala J Selley AB Tallis RC . The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel balance assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2007) 21:341ā6. doi: 10.1177/1545968306296966
47.
Kollen B van de Port I Lindeman E Twisk J Kwakkel G . Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke. (2005) 36:2676ā80. doi: 10.1161/01.Str.0000190839.29234.50
48.
Petersen RC Lopez O Armstrong MJ Getchius TSD Ganguli M Gloss D et al . Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of neurology. Neurology. (2018) 90:126ā35. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004826
49.
Richard G KolskƄr K Ulrichsen KM Kaufmann T AlnƦs D Sanders AM et al . Brain age prediction in stroke patients: highly reliable but limited sensitivity to cognitive performance and response to cognitive training. Neuroimage Clin. (2020) 25:102159. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102159
50.
Depression: Evidence Update . A summary of selected new evidence relevant to NICE clinical guideline 90 āthe treatment and management of depression in adultsā (2009) [internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2012).
Summary
Keywords
stroke, cognitive, depressive, exercise, meta-analysis
Citation
Yang Z, Qin S, Li J, Li C, Lu Y, He P, Liu J and Pei L (2025) The effect of exercise interventions on reducing the risk of depressive and cognitive disorders in post-strokeāa systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 16:1564347. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1564347
Received
21 January 2025
Accepted
21 February 2025
Published
24 March 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Shihao He, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), China
Reviewed by
Xiaofan Yu, Capital Medical University, China
Xueyi Guan, Capital Medical University, China
Updates
Copyright
Ā© 2025 Yang, Qin, Li, Li, Lu, He, Liu and Pei.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pei He, hepei_85@126.com; Jia Liu, liujia252910041@126.com; Lin Pei, peilin13831190309@126.com
ā These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.