ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 10 April 2025

Sec. Neuro-Otology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1567233

This article is part of the Research TopicVestibular Migraine: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and ManagementView all articles

Vestibular migraine: course of symptoms during a four-year follow-up

Nese Celebisoy&#x;Nese Celebisoy1Ays&#x;n K&#x;sabay
&#x;Aysın Kısabay2*Hüseyin Nezih 
zdemirHüseyin Nezih Özdemir1Figen GokcayFigen Gokcay1Aysegul Seyma Sar&#x;tasAysegul Seyma Sarıtas2Hulya ToydemirHulya Toydemir3V&#x;ldan YaylaVıldan Yayla3Ilksen Is&#x;kayIlksen Isıkay4&#x;rem Erkentİrem Erkent4Ceyla AtacCeyla Atac5Sebnem B&#x;cakc&#x;Sebnem Bıcakcı6Feray GüleFeray Güleç7D&#x;lek Top Kart&#x;Dılek Top Kartı8Eylem Ozayd&#x;n GoksuEylem Ozaydın Goksu9
  • 1Department of Neurology, Ege University, Bornova, Türkiye
  • 2Department of Neurology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Türkiye
  • 3Department of Neurology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Istanbul, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 4Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 5Department of Neurology, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
  • 6Department of Neurology, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye
  • 7Department of Neurology, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
  • 8Department of Neurology, Izmir Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Izmir, Türkiye
  • 9Department of Neurology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye

Background and objective: Data about the prognosis of vestibular migraine (VM) is scarce. VM patients on follow-up for at least 4 years were included in this multicenter study to evaluate the course of symptoms.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. A structured questionnaire was used inquiring demographic features, age of onset of migraine headaches and vertigo attacks, headache and vertigo attack frequency, severity, associated features and the presence of interictal dizziness and positional vertigo. Menopause, history of motion sickness, and family history of migraine were recorded. Answers of the first visit were compared with the answers of the last visit. In addition, variables considered were evaluated regarding their effect on the symptom course.

Results: 203 patients were studied. Median vertigo and headache attack frequency and severity had significantly dropped during follow-up (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Complete resolution was reported by only 5.4%. Dizziness between the attacks was present in 67%, and positional vertigo was reported by 20.2%. Univariate analysis showed that aural symptoms (p = 0.013) and menopause (p = 0.016) were risk factors for ongoing frequent vertigo attacks. A history of motion sickness (p = 0.019) and a family history of migraine (p = 0.004) were associated with the risk of frequent migraine headaches. The presence of allodynia (p = 0.002) was associated with severe headache attacks while an early age of onset of vertigo attacks (p = 0.005) was a risk factor for continuing high-frequency vertigo attacks.

Conclusion: Though the frequency and severity of headache and vertigo attacks decrease, complete resolution is reported by a minority.

Introduction

Vestibular migraine (VM) defines vestibular symptoms causally related to migraine. The attacks can be associated with spontaneous or positional vertigo. Visually induced dizziness and head motion intolerance are common features (1). The diagnosis is mainly based on clinical history and the exclusion of other causes. In the absence of available and reliable diagnostic laboratory tests, the diagnosis is made using diagnostic criteria developed through the collaboration of the International Headache Society and the International Barany Society for Neuro-otology (2, 3). It is recognized as the most frequent cause of recurrent vertigo (4, 5), with a lifetime prevalence around 1% and a 1-year prevalence of 0.9% in the general population (4). In a more recent population-based survey, the prevalence of VM in adults was estimated to be 2.7% (6). Treatment strategies are based on migraine guidelines. A review of prophylactic agents reported improvement with all treatment options. However, the heterogeneity of study design and outcome reporting prohibited the establishment of a preferred treatment modality (7). There are only a few studies dealing with the prognosis of VM, and the natural course is obscure. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the course of symptoms in patients with VM.

Materials and methods

This is a cross-sectional study. The study was performed in nine tertiary centers in Turkey. Of the 415 patients who were examined and diagnosed with VM according to the criteria of the International Headache Society and the International Barany Society for Neuro-otology collaboration (2, 3), and who had participated in our previous study (8), attempts were made to reach them by phone calls. Those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were requested to answer the questions of the structured questionnaire that had been used during the initial visit. The patients were monitored during the follow-up period and received acute and prophylactic treatment when necessary. Senior neurologists evaluated the patients for inclusion in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) definite diagnosis of VM; (2) a follow-up of at least 4 years; (3) not being on any migraine prophylactic drug during the last 3 months preceding the evaluation, after a minimum of 4 years of follow-up; (4) ability to understand and participate in the assessments. Patients with the following criteria were excluded from the study: (1) fulfilling diagnostic criteria for definite Meniere’s disease (MD) at the initial visit (9); (2) having another central or peripheral vestibular disorder (e.g., stroke, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo) within the last 3 months that may confound the results; (3) presence of severe systemic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular, diabetes mellitus with autonomic neuropathy) that may confound the results; (4) significant substance abuse or alcoholism (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Selection of patients included in the study. VM, Vestibular migraine; MD, Meniere’s disease.

By using the questionnaire, the course of the symptoms was evaluated. Patients were asked retrospective questions over the phone about their complaints in the last 3 months, in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Migraine type was noted as migraine with aura (MwA) or migraine without aura (MwoA). Gender, age of onset of migraine headaches and vertigo attacks, headache and vertigo attack frequency (assessed by the number of attacks per month), severity [determined by visual analog scales (VAS), measured in centimeters from 0 to 10], and associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia/phonophobia, allodynia, tinnitus, ear fullness, hearing loss) were considered. Interictal complaints, such as dizziness and positional vertigo, were questioned. The presence of menopause, history of motion sickness, and family history of migraine were also recorded.

The outcome measures were vertigo attack frequency per month, vertigo attack severity, headache attack frequency per month, and headache attack severity. The number of attacks in the last 3 months was asked to determine the attack frequency. For VAS, the patient was asked to rate both headache and vertigo attack severity on a scale from 0 to 10. Only headaches and vestibular symptoms associated with VM were considered. Migraine-associated headaches were determined using the International Headache Society criteria (2). Vestibular symptoms associated with VM were identified based on the qualifying vestibular symptoms for VM, as outlined in the notes of the diagnostic criteria (2, 3). Attacks were defined as episodes of moderate or severe intensity symptoms lasting for designated durations, specific to either headache or vestibular symptoms (2, 3).

The answers to the questions evaluating the symptoms obtained during the first visit were compared with those gathered at the last visit to determine if any differences were present during the minimum four-year follow-up. An improvement in an outcome measure was defined as a reduction of more than 50%, in analogy with migraine treatment trials, which take a 50% decrease in migraine attacks as a success for migraine prophylaxis (10). The effect of the above-mentioned variables on improvements in the outcome measures was investigated using appropriate statistical tests.

The study protocol was approved by Ege University Medical School Ethics Committee (reference number: 24-12T/46) and approval from the local ethics committees of all the participating centers were obtained. Written informed consent was given by all participants.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS 21 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) software was used for the statistical analysis. Numeric variables with a normal distribution were described using means and standard deviations, while those without a normal distribution were described using median values and ranges. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of distribution. Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparison of independent variables. Univariate regression analysis was used to assess the effect of the independent variables on the outcome measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify potential cut-off quantitative values determining the age to assess outcome measurements. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 203 patients were included in the study, consisting of 173 women (85.2%) and 30 men (14.8%), with a mean age of 47 ± 12.2 years. The mean age at headache onset was 28.7 ± 6.9 years, and the mean age at the onset of vestibular attacks was 34.9 ± 9.7 years. Among the patients with migraine headaches, 171 (84.2%) had migraine without aura (MwoA), and 32 (15.8%) had migraine with aura (MwA) (Table 1). Of the 203 VM patients included in the study, 146 (71.9%) had used prophylactic medication when needed during the follow-up period and had discontinued it at least 3 months prior to the evaluation, as they no longer required it. When the symptom course was evaluated, 130 (64.1%) patients reported an improvement in vertigo attack frequency, while 73 (35.9%) patients reported no improvement. Vertigo attack VAS scores improved in 118 (58.1%) patients and did not improve in 85 (41.8%) patients (Table 2). Eleven patients (6 women and 5 men) (5.4%) in the group showing improvement defined complete resolution of both headache and vertigo attacks during the follow-up period. The median vertigo attack frequency per month was 4 (range: 1–8) at enrollment, and reduced to 2 (range: 0–8) at the follow-up assessment. The median vertigo severity was 7 (range: 1–10) according to the VAS at the onset of VM, and 5 (range: 0–10) at the follow-up. The median vertigo attack frequency and severity were significantly lower at the follow-up assessment compared to the onset (p < 0.001 for both comparisons) (Table 3; Figure 2). Correlation analysis showed that the decrease in VAS scores for headache and vertigo attacks were correlated (p = 0.03) as well as the decrease in headache and vertigo attack frequency (p < 0.001).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and clinic features of patients.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Course of symptoms during follow-up.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Vertigo and headache and attack frequency and severity during the first and last evaluation.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Vertigo and headache frequency and severity at the initial and last visit.

Dizziness between attacks was present in 136 (67%) patients. Twenty-two of the 136 patients experienced new-onset interictal dizziness. Additionally, 41 (20.2%) patients reported positional vertigo, with 11 defining it as a new symptom.

An improvement in headache attack frequency was present in 132 (65.1%) patients, while 71 (34.9%) patients did not report an improvement. Headache VAS scores decreased in 108 (53.2%) patients, while 95 (46.8%) patients did not experience a decrease (Table 2). The median headache attack frequency per month was 3 (range: 1–7) at the onset of VM, and 1 (range: 0–7) at the last visit. The median headache VAS score was 8 (range: 2–10) at the onset, and 7 (range: 0–10) at the last visit (p < 0.001 for both comparisons) (Table 3; Figure 2).

Tinnitus and ear fullness were present in 103 (50.7%) patients. Nineteen patients with new-onset aural symptoms were included in the group that did not report an improvement in aural features. Hearing loss was reported by 22 (10.8%) patients, with 15 experiencing it during the first visit and 7 with new onset. Eighteen (8.9%) patients had allodynia at the onset of VM, while 29 (14.2%) patients reported new-onset allodynia associated with their attacks. Allodynia was not present in 156 (76.8%) patients.

The presence of motion sickness in the past medical history was noted in 124 (61.1%) patients. A positive family history of migraine was reported by 57 (28.1%) patients. Among the 173 women, 72 (41.6%) were in the menopausal period, with 37 (21.4%) in this stage at the first visit and 35 (20.2%) within the last 4 years (Table 1).

The univariate analysis revealed factors associated with vertigo attack frequency and severity. Patients with aural features (aural fullness/tinnitus, hearing loss) had a higher risk of no improvement in both vertigo attack frequency (OR: 4.500 [95% CI: 1.010–12.536], p = 0.013) and severity (OR: 2.438 [95% CI: 1.117–7.743], p = 0.032). Similarly, the presence of menopause elevated the risk of no improvement in both vertigo attack frequency (OR: 1.877 [95% CI: 1.005–3.495], p = 0.016) and severity (OR: 1.806 [95% CI: 1.004–3.386], p = 0.017).

Several factors were associated with no improvement in headache. Patients with a history of motion sickness (OR: 1.289 [95% CI: 1.028–1.615], p = 0.019) and a family history of migraine (OR: 1.354 [95% CI: 1.126–1.628], p = 0.004) had a higher risk of no improvement in headache attack frequency. The presence of allodynia (OR: 1.653 [95% CI: 1.084–2.520], p = 0.002) elevated the risk of no improvement in headache severity (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Results of the univariate regression analysis performed to identify factors associated with no improvement in vertigo and headache attack frequency and severity.

Patients with and without improvement in vertigo attack frequency were compared regarding age at onset. ROC analysis was used to determine the cut-off value for age at onset. For vertigo attack frequency, an age of 39 years was determined as the cut-off value (AUC: 0.597 [95% CI: 0.526–0.665], p = 0.023). Patients younger than 39 years of age at the onset of VM had a higher risk of no improvement in vertigo attack frequency (OR: 1.693 [95% CI: 1.176–2.437], p = 0.005). No significant results were found when applying ROC analysis to vertigo severity, headache attack frequency, and headache severity (p > 0.05).

The other parameters considered, including gender, migraine type, associated features other than allodynia and aural symptoms, interictal dizziness, and interictal positional vertigo, were not related to an improvement in headache or vertigo attack frequency or severity (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Studies dealing with prognosis in VM patients are scarce. A follow-up study conducted 9 years after the initial diagnosis found that almost 90% of the 61 patients included still suffered from recurring vestibular attacks, and migraine headaches were present in all but one patient. Vertigo frequency was reduced in 56%, increased in 29%, and unchanged in 16%. The impact of vertigo was severe in 21%, moderate in 43%, and mild in 36%. In this study, patient examinations not included in our study are also available, revealing an increase in interictal ocular motor abnormalities from 16% initially to 41% of patients at follow-up, with positional nystagmus being the most frequent finding detected in 28%. Associated cochlear symptoms had also increased from 15% initially to 49, and 18% had developed mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (11).

Our results were somewhat similar. Complete resolution of both headache and vertigo attacks was reported by only 5.4% of the patients. Though frequency and severity had improved, headache and vertigo attacks continued to recur. Interictal dizziness was present in 67%, and positional vertigo was reported by 20.2% of the group. Tinnitus and aural fullness were present in around 50%, with newly added patients during the follow-up period. Hearing loss was reported by 10.8%.”

In our previous study on the response to treatment in patients with VM who were given conventional migraine prophylactic drugs (amitriptyline, flunarizine, propranolol, topiramate, and venlafaxine) and followed up for at least 1 year, aural fullness and cutaneous allodynia accompanying attacks were the factors associated with reduced treatment response (12). In the current study, we did not include patients who were taking migraine prophylactic drugs to avoid interfering with the natural course of the disease. However, similar to the treatment study, the presence of aural symptoms was associated with ongoing frequent and severe vertigo attacks. VM patients are known to have a higher risk of cochlear disorders (tinnitus, sudden deafness, and sensorineural hearing loss), with a nearly three-fold increase (13), and about half of Meniere’s patients, who suffer from tinnitus, hearing loss, and aural fullness, also have a history of migraine (13). An overlap of vestibulo-cochlear symptoms in VM and Meniere’s disease (MD) has been reported in several studies (1422). One study showed that around 50% of MD patients initially presented only cochlear symptoms without vertigo attacks (23).

The patients in our study were evaluated clinically and with pure tone audiometry during their first visit, and those with low-frequency hearing loss compatible with MD were not included in the follow-up study. Although the follow-up visits did not include an audiometric evaluation, the association of aural symptoms with more frequent and severe vestibular attacks raised suspicion for comorbid MD, which became evident over time.

Again, in another study from our group, VM patients were more frequently in the menopausal period compared to migraine patients without vestibular symptoms (24). Consistent with the above-mentioned study, menopause was a risk factor for unremitting frequent and severe vertigo attacks in the current study. A negative correlation has been shown between serum estradiol levels and the severity, frequency, and duration of VM attacks in postmenopausal women with VM (25), which aligns with our results.

In addition, an early age of onset of vestibular attacks seemed to be associated with ongoing high-frequency vertigo attacks. Central sensitization, as well as trigemino-vascular and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) effects on the vestibular system, are the theories proposed to explain VM pathogenesis (26). Significantly increased thalamic activation, in comparison with migraine patients and healthy controls, has been reported in VM patients, showing a positive correlation with the number of attacks (27). Attacks starting at an early age and continuing for years seem to be a risk factor for persistent frequent attacks.

On the other hand, a history of motion sickness and a family history of migraine were associated with ongoing frequent headache attacks. Motion sickness is well described in patients with migraine (28), and VM patients are reported to be more susceptible to motion sickness than those with migraine (24, 29, 30). The key structures in the brainstem that contribute to symptoms of motion sickness and migraine include the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, the vestibular nuclei, and the nucleus tractus solitarius. Persistent excitability of these brainstem nuclei could increase vulnerability to both motion sickness and migraine symptoms (31).

A family history of migraine is common in both migraine and VM, though not much is known about specific genetic alterations (26). A stronger link has been reported to be associated with a lower age at onset and more frequent attacks, suggesting that specific clinical features may be more determined by genetic factors (32).

The presence of allodynia in our group was associated with the risk of ongoing severe migraine headaches. Cutaneous allodynia is a common feature accompanying migraine attacks, characterized by pain perception in response to non-painful stimulation of the skin, which results from central sensitization of second and third-order trigemino-vascular neurons. It predicts a poor acute treatment response (33) and is a risk factor for disease progression from episodic to chronic migraine (34). In an online survey study including over 15,000 migraine patients, a significant association between allodynia and headache pain intensity has been reported (35).

The prognostic significance of vestibular function tests on the improvement in vertigo and headache symptoms has also been studied. Abnormal posturography and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) responses, indicating abnormalities in vestibulospinal pathways, have been reported to be associated with a poor response (36).

The other longitudinal studies are mainly on treatment responses with different drugs, reporting more than 70% improvement in vertigo and headache with lifestyle modifications and prophylactic medications (flunarizine, amitriptyline) (36). Female gender, comorbid benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, and high initial dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores were reported as good prognostic indicators for improvement in dizziness in another study with a protocol of antidepressants, antiepileptics, beta blockers, and vestibular rehabilitation (37), while peripheral vestibular weakness on caloric testing was a poor prognostic factor (38).

The main limitation of our study is that it only involves symptom evaluation, which depends on the patients’ declaration and is therefore thoroughly subjective. Additionally, the selection of patients not requiring therapy for at least 3 months, and the lack of evaluation of psychiatric disorders might be potential confounding factors. In a four-year follow-up, although the frequency and severity of the headache and vertigo attacks seemed to decrease, complete resolution was reported by only 5.4%. Interictal dizziness was reported by 67%, and positional vertigo by 20.2%. Aural symptoms and menopause were risk factors for ongoing frequent and severe vertigo attacks, while a history of motion sickness and a family history of migraine were associated with the risk of ongoing frequent migraine headaches. An early age of onset of vertigo attacks was found to be a risk factor for continuing high-frequency vertigo attacks, while the presence of allodynia was associated with severe headache attacks.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ege University Medical School Ethics Committee (Reference number: 24-12T/46). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the patients/participants or patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

NC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft. HÖ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft. FG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. AS: Data curation, Writing – original draft. HT: Data curation, Writing – original draft. VY: Data curation, Writing – original draft. II: Data curation, Writing – original draft. İE: Data curation, Writing – original draft. CA: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. SB: Data curation, Writing – original draft. FG: Data curation, Writing – original draft. DK: Data curation, Writing – original draft. EG: Data curation, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Atilla Atasever for his contributions for the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Lempert, T, and Von Brevern, M. Vestibular Migraine. Neurol Clin. (2019) 37:695–706. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.06.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lempert, T, Olesen, J, Furman, J, Waterston, J, Seemungal, B, Carey, J, et al. Vestibular migraine: diagnostic criteria. J Vest Res. (2012) 22:167–72. doi: 10.3233/VES-2012-0453

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Neuhauser, HK, Radtke, A, von Brevern, M, Feldmann, M, Lezius, F, Ziese, T, et al. Migrainous vertigo: prevalence and impact on quality of life. Neurology. (2006) 67:1028–33. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237539.09942.06

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Radtke, A, Neuhauser, H, von Brevern, M, Hottenrott, T, and Lempert, T. Vestibular migraine--validity of clinical diagnostic criteria. Cephalalgia. (2011) 31:906–13. doi: 10.1177/0333102411405228

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Formeister, EJ, Rizk, HG, Kohn, MA, and Sharon, JD. The epidemiology of vestibular migraine: a population-based survey study. Otol Neurotol. (2018) 39:1037–44. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001900

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Byun, YJ, Levy, DA, Nguyen, SA, Brennan, E, and Rizk, HG. Treatment of vestibular migraine: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. (2021) 131:186–94. doi: 10.1002/lary.28546

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Çelebisoy, N, Kısabay Ak, A, Özdemir, HN, Gökçay, F, Durmaz, GS, Kartı, DT, et al. Vestibular migraine, demographic and clinical features of 415 patients: a multicenter study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2022) 215:107201. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lopez-Escamez, JA, Carey, J, Chung, WH, Goebel, JA, Magnusson, M, Mandalà, M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease. J Vestib Res. (2015) 25:1–7. doi: 10.3233/VES-150549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Evers, S, Afra, J, Frese, A, Goadsby, PJ, Linde, M, May, A, et al. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine--revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. (2009) 16:968–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Radtke, A, von Brevern, M, Neuhauser, H, Hottenrott, T, and Lempert, T. Vestibular migraine: long-term follow-up of clinical symptoms and vestibulo-cochlear findings. Neurology. (2012) 79:1607–14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e264f

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kısabay Ak, A, Çelebisoy, N, Özdemir, HN, Gökçay, F, Saruhan Durmaz, G, Top Kartı, D, et al. Factors determining the response to treatment in patients with vestibular migraine. Neurol Res. (2022) 44:847–54. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2056341

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hwang, JH, Tsai, SJ, Liu, TC, Chen, YC, and Lai, JT. Association of Tinnitus and Other Cochlear Disorders with a history of migraines. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2018) 144:712–7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0939

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sarna, B, Abouzari, M, Lin, HW, and Djalilian, HR. A hypothetical proposal for association between migraine and Meniere's disease. Med Hypotheses. (2020) 134:109430. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Radtke, A, Lempert, T, Gresty, MA, Brookes, GB, Bronstein, AM, and Neuhauser, H. Migraine and Ménière's disease: is there a link? Neurology. (2002) 59:1700–4. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000036903.22461.39

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cha, YH, Brodsky, J, Ishiyama, G, Sabatti, C, and Baloh, RW. The relevance of migraine in patients with Meńière's disease. Acta Otolaryngol. (2007) 127:1241–5. doi: 10.1080/00016480701242469

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Cha, YH, Kane, MJ, and Baloh, RW. Familial clustering of migraine, episodic vertigo, and Ménière's disease. Otol Neurotol. (2008) 29:93–6. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c2abb

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Brantberg, K, and Baloh, RW. Similarity of vertigo attacks due to Meniere's disease and benign recurrent vertigo, both with and without migraine. Acta Otolaryngol. (2011) 131:722–7. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.556661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Neff, BA, Staab, JP, Eggers, SD, Carlson, ML, Schmitt, WR, Van Abel, KM, et al. Auditory and vestibular symptoms and chronic subjective dizziness in patients with Ménière's disease, vestibular migraine, and Ménière's disease with concomitant vestibular migraine. Otol Neurotol. (2012) 33:1235–44. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825d644a

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ghavami, Y, Mahboubi, H, Yau, AY, Maducdoc, M, and Djalilian, HR. Migraine features in patients with Meniere's disease. Laryngoscope. (2016) 126:163–8. doi: 10.1002/lary.25344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Murofushi, T, Tsubota, M, Kitao, K, and Yoshimura, E. Simultaneous presentation of definite vestibular migraine and definite Ménière's disease: overlapping syndrome of two diseases. Front Neurol. (2018) 9:749. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00749

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lopez-Escamez, JA, Dlugaiczyk, J, Jacobs, J, Lempert, T, Teggi, R, von Brevern, M, et al. Accompanying symptoms overlap during attacks in Menière's disease and vestibular migraine. Front Neurol. (2014) 5:265. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zhang, Y, Liu, B, Wang, R, Jia, R, and Gu, X. Characteristics of the Cochlear symptoms and functions in Meniere's disease. Chin Med J. (2016) 129:2445–50. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.191767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Çelebisoy, N, Ak, AK, Ataç, C, Özdemir, HN, Gökçay, F, Durmaz, GS, et al. Comparison of clinical features in patients with vestibular migraine and migraine. J Neurol. (2023) 270:3567–73. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11677-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tang, B, Yu, X, Jiang, W, Zhang, C, Zhan, T, and He, Y. Clinical significance of serum sex hormones in postmenopausal women with vestibular migraine: potential role of estradiol. J Int Med Res. (2021) 49:3000605211016379. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016379

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Benjamin, T, Gillard, D, Abouzari, M, Djalilian, HR, and Sharon, JD. Vestibular and auditory manifestations of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol. (2022) 35:84–9. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Russo, A, Marcelli, V, Esposito, F, Corvino, V, Marcuccio, L, Giannone, A, et al. Abnormal thalamic function in patients with vestibular migraine. Neurology. (2014) 82:2120–6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Furman, JM, and Marcus, DA. Migraine and motion sensitivity. Continuum. (2012) 18:1102–17. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000421621.18407.96

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Özçelik, P, Koçoğlu, K, Öztürk, V, Keskinoğlu, P, and Akdal, G. Characteristic differences between vestibular migraine and migraine only patients. J Neurol. (2022) 269:336–41. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10636-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Teggi, R, Colombo, B, Albera, R, Asprella Libonati, G, Balzanelli, C, Batuecas Caletrio, A, et al. Clinical Features, Familial History, and Migraine Precursors in Patients With Definite Vestibular Migraine: The VM-Phenotypes Projects. Headache. (2018) 58:534–44. doi: 10.1111/head.13240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Cuomo-Granston, A, and Drummond, PD. Migraine and motion sickness: what is the link? Prog Neurobiol. (2010) 91:300–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pelzer, N, Louter, MA, van Zwet, EW, Nyholt, DR, Ferrari, MD, van den Maagdenberg, AM, et al. Linking migraine frequency with family history of migraine. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:229–36. doi: 10.1177/0333102418783295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lipton, RB, Munjal, S, Buse, DC, Bennett, A, Fanning, KM, Burstein, R, et al. Allodynia is associated with initial and sustained response to acute migraine treatment: results from the American migraine prevalence and prevention study. Headache. (2017) 57:1026–40. doi: 10.1111/head.13115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Louter, MA, Bosker, JE, van Oosterhout, WP, van Zwet, EW, Zitman, FG, Ferrari, MD, et al. Cutaneous allodynia as a predictor of migraine chronification. Brain. (2013) 136:3489–96. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt251

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Dodick, DW, Reed, ML, Fanning, KM, Munjal, S, Alam, A, Buse, DC, et al. Predictors of allodynia in persons with migraine: results from the migraine in America symptoms and treatment (MAST) study. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:873–82. doi: 10.1177/0333102418825346

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jung, JH, Yoo, MH, Song, CI, Lee, JR, and Park, HJ. Prognostic significance of vestibulospinal abnormalities in patients with vestibular migraine. Otol Neurotol. (2015) 36:282–8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000656

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Dornhoffer, JR, Liu, YF, Donaldson, L, and Rizk, HG. Factors implicated in response to treatment/prognosis of vestibular migraine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2021) 278:57–66. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06061-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Liu, YF, Dornhoffer, JR, Donaldson, L, and Rizk, HG. Impact of caloric test asymmetry on response to treatment in vestibular migraine. J Laryngol Otol. (2021) 135:320–6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121000712

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: vestibular migraine, vertigo, headache, aural symptoms, menopause, motion sickness, family history of migraine, allodynia

Citation: Celebisoy N, Kısabay A, Özdemir HN, Gokcay F, Sarıtas AS, Toydemir H, Yayla V, Isıkay I, Erkent İ, Atac C, Bıcakcı S, Güleç F, Kartı DT and Goksu EO (2025) Vestibular migraine: course of symptoms during a four-year follow-up. Front. Neurol. 16:1567233. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1567233

Received: 26 January 2025; Accepted: 25 March 2025;
Published: 10 April 2025.

Edited by:

Michael Von Brevern, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany

Reviewed by:

John Waterston, Monash University, Australia
Roberto Teggi, San Raffaele Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2025 Celebisoy, Kısabay, Özdemir, Gokcay, Sarıtas, Toydemir, Yayla, Isıkay, Erkent, Atac, Bıcakcı, Güleç, Kartı and Goksu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aysın Kısabay, YXlzaW5raXNhYmF5QGhvdG1haWwuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.