STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1568728
This article is part of the Research TopicNew methods in neurorehabilitationView all 17 articles
Development of a cohort multiple Randomised Clinical Trial to test an integRated system Of sensOrs and Multimedia Monitors technology, for stroke rEhabilitation: the ROOMMATE study protocol
Provisionally accepted- 1Neuromoter Research Unit, IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi Firenze, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
- 2Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
- 3Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
- 4School of Specialization in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
- 5Discipline of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine – Elias University Emergency Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
- 6Department Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Tuscany, Italy
- 7Medea S.r.l., Florence, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of disability globally, creating significant challenges for healthcare systems. Early intensive rehabilitation is recommended (NICE2023) for functional recovery; but standard therapy may not cover all patients' needs. Stroke survivors should continue active task practice outside of scheduled therapy sessions (self-directed, or semi-supervised by family and caregivers), possibly by sustainable technological solutions. However, most technology-based ecosystems are not designed for healthcare. To test a digital stroke rehab ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard, but present ethical and logistical challenges, particularly in blinding and participant adherence. This study protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT06728020; March 21 st, 2025) employs a cohort multiple RCT (cmRCT) innovative design, suitable for comparing usual care to interventions in studies with multiple interventions: cmRCT enrols a large observational cohort, allowing random selection of participants for individual trials rather than random allocation for all subjects, alongside a patient-centered approach to information and consent. Methods: A certified device including a multimedia monitor with virtual reality cognitive and motor rehabilitation exercises (VRRS) will be enriched with educational videos and rehabilitation contents, developed by co-creation involving stroke patients, caregivers and rehabilitation professionals (VRRS1). A dynamic cohort of post-acute stroke inpatients will then be prospectively enrolled in a cmRCT: first, the VRRS1 will be randomly proposed to and tested with 70 subjects, while 70 other eligible patients will be randomized to Usual Care (UC) - controls (ROOMMATE 1st); then, the VRRS1, integrated with a set of inertial sensors (BMR4ROOMMATE) (VRRS2), will be tested in a pilot RCT on 30 patients (while 30 other eligible patients will be randomized as controls - ROOMMATE 2nd). The primary outcome will be the Modified Barthel Index, while secondary outcomes will include measures of motor and cognitive functions, as well as feasibility, usability, and device wearability. Conclusions: By combining sensor-based assessment, expert coaching on digital literacy, and the active involvement of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals ROOMMATE aims to co-create an innovative digital ecosystem for Stroke rehabilitation. By rigorously verifying its impact by a cmRCT, it seeks evidence to enhance stroke recovery beyond usual care.
Keywords: Stroke, Digital Ecosystem, enriched environment, cohort multiple randomized controlled trial, Digital health adoption
Received: 30 Jan 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Doronzio, Jansen - Kosterink, Tesi, Castagnoli, Pedrini, Ciapetti, De Marco, Piazzini, Giacani, Ciobanu, Berteanu, Fiorini, Rovini, Cavallo, Agnoloni, Baccini and CECCHI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Margherita Tesi, margherita.tesi@unifi.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.