Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neuro-Otology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1569247

This article is part of the Research TopicMeniere’s Disease: From Diagnosis to TreatmentView all 13 articles

Vestibular function tests are helpful in differentiating between Menière's disease and vestibular migraine

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Apeldoorn Dizziness Centre, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
  • 3Department Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
  • 6Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Aim: Menière’s disease (MD) presents with episodic vertigo and auditory symptoms. Vestibular migraine (VM) typically contains migraine features associated with the vertigo attacks. Distinguishing MD from VM can be challenging due to overlap in symptomatology. To assist in the differentiation between the two, this study aimed to compare auditory and vestibular symptoms and functions in MD and VM, and to assess the diagnostic value of the video head impulse test (vHIT) and caloric test. Methods: A cohort study was performed at a tertiary dizziness clinic in the Netherlands in MD and VM patients seen in our clinic from January 2018 until September 2024. Patients were diagnosed based on the Bárány Society criteria. We collected demographic characteristics, symptoms at presentation, results of pure-tone audiometry (PTA), caloric testing, and vHIT. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the vHIT and caloric test were calculated and the optimal unilateral weakness cut-off value was determined. Results: The mean age of the MD patients (n=194) was 60.2±13.4 years, with 46.4% females. The VM patients (n=101) had a mean age of 50.2±14.6 years, with 86.1% females. Not only MD patients, but also 65.7% of VM patients experienced at least one aural symptom during vertigo attacks. An abnormal caloric test, abnormal horizontal vHIT, and catch-up saccades during the vHIT were observed more frequently in MD than in VM patients. The vHIT had a PPV of 81% and an NPV of 36% to distinguish MD from VM. Additionally, in patients with a normal vHIT, the caloric test had a PPV of 82% with an NPV of 55%. Increasing the unilateral caloric weakness threshold to 34%, increased the PPV to 90%, with an NPV of 52%. Conclusion: While the diagnosis of MD and VM is based on history and audiometry findings, vHIT and caloric testing may aid in differentiating between the two diseases in ambiguous cases. If either the vHIT or caloric test is abnormal, a diagnosis of MD is more likely. The optimal PPV and NPV to differentiate between MD and VM was found with a unilateral caloric weakness threshold of 34%.

Keywords: Caloric test, Video head impulse test, Audiometry, diagnosis, Vertigo, Headache, dissociation, Catch-up saccades

Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Vosbeek, Seelen, Vingerhoed, Schermer, Cannegieter, Terwindt and Bruintjes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Eleonora G.M. Vosbeek, Apeldoorn Dizziness Centre, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.