ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuromuscular Disorders and Peripheral Neuropathies
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1586031
Mortality Risk in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis
Provisionally accepted- 1Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- 3Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Although some reports link Myasthenia Gravis to higher mortality, the evidence remains contradictory and unclear. Real-life data is limited primarily due to challenges in selecting control groups and mitigating bias. Additionally, a revised mortality assessment should be conducted due to recent advancements in Myasthenia Gravis treatments over the past decade, including new biological therapies and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2023. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with Myasthenia Gravis at our tertiary center between 2000 and 2023, extracting mortality and clinical features compared to two age-and sex-matched control groups of neurological or rheumatologic patients. We identified 436 Myasthenic patients and 2,616 controls (1308 in each control group). Myasthenia Gravis mortality was 14% at 5 years (61/422) and 21% at 10 years (87/422). Mortality was significantly higher than control groups (p<0.001). Intubations during myasthenic crisis were linked to higher mortality (p=0.002). Bulbar weakness at presentation showed higher mortality but did not reach clinical significance. We compared the mean age at death in MG patients to national life expectancy benchmarks using a onesample Z-test, revealing significantly younger age at death in both males (78.3 vs. 81.6 years, p = 0.009) and females (76.5 vs. 85.2 years, p < 0.00001). Patients with normal thymic pathology showed better outcomes and lower mortality after thymic removal (p<0.0001). The primary cause of death was linked to infections, significantly correlated with chronic steroid use. In conclusion, patients with Myasthenia Gravis had higher mortality rates. Thymic removal reduced mortality, while intubation is associated with increased mortality risk.
Keywords: Myasthenia Gravis, Mortality, Survival, Myasthenic crisis, Epidemiology
Received: 01 Mar 2025; Accepted: 27 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Khateb and Shelly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mohamed Khateb, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.