ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Stroke
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1593707
This article is part of the Research TopicThe burden and impact of frailty in strokeView all articles
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Pressure Injury Risk Prediction in Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan Province, China
- 2Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Study design:Retrospective Cohort Study.Objective: This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for pressure injury (PI) during the post-stroke recovery phase, develop and validate a nomogram prediction model to facilitate the identification of high-risk individuals for PI, and establish a theoretical framework for optimizing clinical intervention strategies.Methods: Retrospective clinical data were collected from 284 hospitalized stroke patients in the recovery phase (including 85 PI cases) at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants were randomly allocated into training (70%) and internal validation (30%) cohorts. An external validation cohort comprising 60 stroke patients (30 PI cases) from Zigong First People's Hospital (January 2023–January 2024) was additionally analyzed. Univariate analysis and LASSO regression were utilized to screen independent PU risk factors, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was evaluated using the C-index, calibration curves, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Comparative analyses were conducted against the Braden scale (Model 2) and a combined model incorporating the Braden scale (Model 3).Results: Independent risk factors for PI in post-stroke recovery patients included hemorrhagic stroke subtype, advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, elevated leukocyte counts, and low Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores. The nomogram model incorporating these five predictors demonstrated AUC values of 0.902 (training cohort), 0.935 (internal validation), and 0.936 (external validation), exceeding the predictive capacity of individual variables: stroke type (AUC=0.642), age (AUC=0.756), albumin level (AUC=0.754), leukocyte count (AUC=0.712), and ADL score (AUC=0.839). Calibration curves indicated strong concordance between predicted and observed outcomes, while DCA confirmed substantial clinical net benefit. The Braden scale (AUC=0.817) exhibited inferior predictive performance compared to our model, and the combined model (AUC=0.901) showed no significant improvement, underscoring the parsimony and clinical utility of the proposed nomogram.Conclusion: The nomogram developed in this study for predicting PIs in stroke recovery patients demonstrates high accuracy and discrimination, facilitating the early identification of high-risk individuals and aiding in the formulation of personalized intervention strategies.
Keywords: :Stroke, Pressure Ulcer, nomogram, risk prediction, Retrospective study
Received: 20 Mar 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tang, Zhong, Liao, Fu, Xie, Lv, Zhou and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yulei Xie, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.