ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Movement Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1594382
Quantitative and Qualitative Tremor Evaluation after MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 2German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers (HZ), Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 3O. P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India
- 4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
- 5Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
- 6Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
- 8Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Tremor syndromes are common neurological disorders, usually distinguished by clinical examination. Ordinal rating scales are widely used to rate tremor severity but are limited by subjective observation, interrater reliability, ceiling effects and lack of knowledge about sensitivity to change emphasizing the relevance of quantitative methods. To assess tremor characteristics in essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease tremor (PT) quantitatively, we used a wearable triaxial accelerometer in comparison to a common clinical rating scale. Furthermore, different activation conditions and changes after treatment with MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) were examined concomitantly. Patients with disabling, medication-refractory ET (n=35) or PT (n=21) undergoing unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy were assessed before, one, six and 12 months after MRgFUS treatment. Clinical assessments included the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) and accelerometric recordings at rest, posture and kinetic movement. Peak frequencies (fp), frequency width at half maximum (FWHM), tremor stability index (TSI), and half-width power (HWP) were extracted from the power spectrum of acceleration and compared to the CRST. We observed moderate to strong correlations between CRST subscores and log-transformed HWP, whereas significant correlations were only evident in ET when groups were evaluated separately. Fp, FWHM and TSI showed no differences between groups and conditions. Further, repeated measurements after MRgFUS treatment revealed significant changes of tremor severity in both, clinical rating and accelerometric recordings. Tremor assessment using accelerometric recordings provided a fast and investigator independent method for tremor characterization and quantitative assessment, which were sensitive to changes after therapeutic interventions.
Keywords: Tremor, Thalamotomy, MRgFUS, accelerometry, quantitative measurements
Received: 16 Mar 2025; Accepted: 18 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Purrer, Chand, Pohl, Weiland, Borger, Schmeel, Boecker and Wüllner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Veronika Purrer, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 53105, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.