REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Stroke
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1597504
Efficacy of different types of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke aphasia patients: a network meta-analysis (This study consisits of 16 figures and 1 table)
Provisionally accepted
- Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for post-stroke aphasia through a network meta-analysis (NMA).: We systematically searched four international databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) and three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP) from inception through October 2024. Two reviewers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Discrepancies are resolved through third-party adjudication. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0. Results: Thirty-eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs, n=1,982) were included, and the NMA results showed that (1) Low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) in combination with High-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) (LF-rTMS&HF-rTMS) showed well performance in all indicators; (2) intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) exhibited well benefits for comprehension and repetition domains; (3) Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) showed superior efficacy in naming. (4) Stimulation of the pars opercularis (POp) was superior to the pars triangularis (PTr) within the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). (5) Anatomical landmarks (AL) was the predominant targeting method. Conclusion: LF-TMS & HF-TMS is the most effective intervention for clinical treatment of post-stroke aphasia. When targeting the IFG, POp is the optimal stimulation site. Regarding targeting methods, the 10-20 EEG system currently has the strongest evidence base.
Keywords: Transcranial magnetic stimulation1, rTMS2, aphasia3, Stroke4, TBS5, network meta analysis6
Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Xiao, Gong, Jia and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Song Jin, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.