Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurorehabilitation

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1597567

This article is part of the Research TopicNew methods in neurorehabilitationView all 21 articles

The efficacy and safety of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulses on prolonged disorders of consciousness: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Provisionally accepted
  • 1International Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute, Basical Department, Medical College,College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2International Vegetative State and Consciousness Science Institute, Basical Department, Medical College, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
  • 3Department of critical care rehabilitation, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 4Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, California, United States
  • 5UCLA Department of Psychology,UCLA Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Injury Research Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) have yielded limited success. Among them, only studies involving amantadine have provided Class II evidence. The effects of other non-invasive brain stimulation techniques remain inconclusive, largely due to patient heterogeneity and the clinical complexities of implementing such interventions. Low-intensity focused ultrasound pulses (LIFUP), as a novel, non-invasive, and safe neuromodulation technique, have the potential to both stimulate and inhibit deep subcortical structures. This makes LIFUP a promising approach for modulating consciousness and promoting recovery in patients with pDoC. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of LIFUP through a randomized controlled design. Methods and analysis: Our primary research focus involves conducting multimodal neurofunctional assessments throughout the intervention period. Specifically, we intend to investigate the relationship between Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) signals, electroencephalography (EEG) patterns, thalamic concentrations of glutamate and glutamine (Glx) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and behavioral outcomes under two different LIFUP parameter settings (100Hz transcranial ultrasound stimulation [TUS] and theta-burst TUS [tbTUS]). Discussion: Through a comprehensive exploration of parameter setting combined with multimodal neurofunctional assessments, this study evaluates both therapeutic potential and safety considerations of ultrasound-based interventions for pDoC. We hypothesize that the two stimulation protocols (100Hz TUS and tb TUS) will differentially modulate neural connectivity, thalamus activity, and the Glx/GABA balance. The findings may advance evidence-based interventions for pDoC and identify potential neuroplasticity biomarkers to guide future therapeutic strategies. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400092904. Registered on 26 November 2024.

Keywords: Low-intensity focused ultrasound, Prolonged Disorders of consciousness, randomizedcontrolled trial, multi-modal measurement, Rehiabilitation

Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 11 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yuehong, Yu, Hongxiang, Chenxia, Schnakers, Monti and Di. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Haibo Di, dihaibo19@aliyun.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.