ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurotrauma

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1599229

Comparison of traumatic brain injury resulting from stair-related falls to falls from standing height -a neurotrauma center cohort

Provisionally accepted
Cathrine  TverdalCathrine Tverdal1*Andrew  ReinerAndrew Reiner2Eirik  HelsethEirik Helseth1,3Torgeir  HellstrømTorgeir Hellstrøm4Unn Sollid  ManskowUnn Sollid Manskow5,6Mads  AarhusMads Aarhus1,3Karoline  SkogenKaroline Skogen7Pål  RønningPål Rønning1Dag  Ferner NettelandDag Ferner Netteland1,3
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Nordland, Norway
  • 2Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 6Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
  • 7Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Oslo, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Falls are the leading cause of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in high-income countries, and globally, the incidence of fall-related injuries is projected to rise. In this study, we compare TBI resulting from stair-related falls (SRF) to falls from standing height (FSH), analyzing their epidemiology and outcomes.In a single-center, registry-based cohort study using the Oslo TBI Registry -Neurosurgery (OTBIR-N), we identified adults (≥18 years) admitted to Oslo University Hospital with TBI from either SRF or FSH between 2015 and 2022. Epidemiology and outcome measures were compared between the two groups, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the adjusted effect of the fall mechanisms on dichotomized functional outcome (Glasgow outcome score (GOS) 1-3 vs GOS 4-5).Results: A total of 1,432 patients with a median age of 71 years were included. SRF represented 25%, while FSH represented 52% of all fall-related TBI. SRF patients were generally younger and healthier, with a higher frequency of moderate-severe TBI than FSH patients (53% vs 31%; p<0.001). SRF also occurred more often during evenings and nights, in weekends, and were more often related to alcohol influence (58% vs 22%; p<0.001). Both fall types resulted in unfavorable functional outcome (GOS 1-3) for a substantial proportion of patients (37% in SRF and 42% in FSH; p=.066). When adjusting for covariates in the multivariable logistic regression model, there was a tendency of SRF being associated with unfavourable outcome compared to FSH, but the effect was not statistically significant (OR 1.43, 95%CI 0.97 -2.12; p=0.073) Conclusion: SRF represented a considerable proportion of fall-related TBI and was associated with poor outcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Targeted public awareness campaigns addressing the risks associated with staircases, especially when combined with alcohol-influence, seems warranted to prevent such injuries.

Keywords: Traumatic Brain Injury, Epidemiology, falls, Stairs, Standing height, adults, older

Received: 24 Mar 2025; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tverdal, Reiner, Helseth, Hellstrøm, Manskow, Aarhus, Skogen, Rønning and Netteland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cathrine Tverdal, Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, 4950, Nordland, Norway

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.