ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Epilepsy
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1604317
This article is part of the Research TopicPrevention of and early intervention for behavioral health disorders in people with epilepsyView all 5 articles
Validating the Traditional Chinese Version of the Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument (EASI) in Hong Kong
Provisionally accepted- Department of Psychiatry, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Anxiety disorders are prevalent and impactful in people with epilepsy (PWE) but under-recognized. Issues regarding epilepsy-specific anxiety have received emerging attention in the literature. To improve mental health coverage for PWE, we developed and validated the traditional Chinese version of the Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument (EASI) and its brief screener (brEASI) among PWE in Hong Kong.We developed the TC-EASI through forward and backward translations; an expert panel and a focus group reviewed it. We tested it among PWE 18 years and older using theManual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (CB-SCID), which is the gold standard for diagnosing anxiety disorders. We examined the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the TC-EASI and TC-brEASI. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the TC-EASI's factor structure. We also investigated convergent and divergent validity using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 (DASS-21), and the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP). Further, we analyzed the TC-brEASI's receiver operating characteristic (ROC).We included 203 Chinese PWE; 19.7% had current anxiety disorders, 7.4% had panic disorder, and 5.9% had agoraphobia without panic disorder. The internal consistency and testretest reliability were satisfactory. The TC-EASI had two latent constructs measuring epilepsyspecific and typical anxiety. We found convergent and divergent validity, and a cut-off score of ⩾9 for the TC-brEASI, with a sensitivity of 77.1% (95% CI=65.2-89%), a specificity of 83.9% (95% CI=78.1-89.7%), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.885 (95% CI=0.830-Key Messages:• The traditional Chinese brEASI is a valid and reliable epilepsy-specific screening tool for anxiety disorders in Hong Kong.• It has an optimal cut-off score of ⩾9 with good sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve.• The traditional Chinese EASI has a two-factor model, measuring typical and epilepsy-specific anxiety.
Keywords: Anxiety Disorders, Epilepsy, screening, epilepsy-specific anxiety, EASI
Received: 01 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chan and Wong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ka Wai Chan, Department of Psychiatry, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.