Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1605982

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Autoimmune Encephalitis: From Molecular Insights to Therapeutic ApproachesView all 7 articles

Aberrant lncRNA and mRNA expression in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 2Laizhou No. 1 Middle School, Yantai, China
  • 3Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a nervous autoimmune disorder discovered in the recent more than fifteen years. To understand potential involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in pathogenesis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, we initiated a study to compare the expression profiles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and messenger RNA (mRNAs) in patients of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and healthy controls. Methods: 11 patients who were diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were enrolled in our observational studies. Total RNA was extracted from patients’ plasma and the expression levels of lncRNAs and mRNAswere determined. Differential expression analysis via RNA sequencing, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, as well as a co-expression network of lncRNA-mRNA were performed in 5 patients and 5 healthy controls to evaluate potential the changes in expression patterns. The expression levels of certain lncRNAs and mRNAs were further validated in 11patients and 11 healthy controls using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: It was found that a total of 83 lncRNAs and 2345 mRNAs were differentially expressed in five patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis compared with five healthy controls. Of those lncRNAs, 63 were upregulated and 20 downregulated, while 1509 mRNAs were upregulated and 836 downregulated. GO and KEGG pathway analyses showed that a wide range of biological functions were perturbed during acute anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Differentially expressed genes were found to be involved in autoimmune, B cell signaling, neuroinflammation, or synaptic plasticity. qRT-PCR was conducted in 11 patients and 11healthy controls to further confirm the levels of six lncRNAs and four mRNAs, and the results were found to be consistent with those by RNA sequencing. The co-expression networks of lncRNA-mRNA were performed in some meaningful KEGG analyses, including chemokine signaling pathway, Long-term potentiation, B cell receptor signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings suggest the involvement of a number of molecular pathways in anti-NMDAR encephalitis, some of which could serve as potential biomarkers to assist in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

Keywords: Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis, Long Noncoding RNAs, Messenger RNAs, RNA sequencing, Neuroinflammation

Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 07 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Guo, Teng, Yin, Wang, Wang and Guo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Pin Wang, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, China
Shougang Guo, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.