Sanctuary Sites in Cortical Stroke

Dr Tharani Thirugnana Chandran^*Henry MaJason VuongShaloo SinghalLee-Anne SlaterTHANH G PHAN^*

• Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms ACA - anterior cerebral artery AcomA - anterior communicating artery CoW - Circle of Willis ICA - internal carotid artery LMA - leptomeningeal anastomoses MCA - middle cerebral artery PCA - posterior cerebral artery PcomA - posterior communicating artery Introduction Sanctuary sites1 is a term used to describe regions of brain parenchyma with a low probability of infarction compared to other areas, due to the compensatory capacity of leptomeningeal anastomoses (LMA) following vessel occlusion.2,3 The importance of LMA has been evident since the experiments by Heubner in 1874.4 Heubner witnessed the filling of the entire arterial tree of the cerebral cortex after injecting colored liquid into a single artery, proximally ligated so there was no connection with the Circle of Willis (CoW).4 However, the significance of LMA has been questioned. Cohnheim5 disregarded them and believed in the concept of 'end-arteries.' Duret6 recognized their existence, but he and Charcot7 questioned their functionality due to their small caliber. Beevor8 acknowledged their presence anatomically and described variabilities in arterial territories but did not make the connection between the two.9-11 In 1925, Fay12 attempted to prove Cohnheim's5 theory of 'end-arteries,' but found comparable results to Heubner4 with mercury injection filling all cortical arteries despite the branches of the CoW being tied.12 The first detailed anatomy of LMA was provided by Vander Eecken and Adams13 in 1953. Similar observations have been documented by Wollschlaeger and Wollschlaeger14 and Lazorthes et al.15 These arterial connections have also been extensively confirmed angiographically.16-23 The small diameter of these vessels and the substantial inter and intra-individual variability may account for the initial lack of recognition.9,13,17,23-26 Current evidence for LMA maintaining the ischemic penumbra and reducing infarct growth is apparent in the extended time window reperfusion trials.27,28 Collateral status is now recognized as a key determinant of reperfusion and clinical outcome following endovascular clot retrieval.28-31 However, a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy, location and prevalence of leptomeningeal collaterals,9 sanctuary sites1 and their importance in modifying stroke deficits is still in development. The concept of sanctuary sites in ischemic stroke Sanctuary sites are regions of potentially salvageable penumbral tissue predominantly present within the frontal, parietal and occipital cortex (see Figure 1).1 Figure 1 is a schematic representation of sanctuary sites1 created using published digital maps of cortical stroke with documented vessel occlusion.3,32-34 Segmented infarcts from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images were averaged to generate a probability of infarction at a voxel level for each arterial territory. The probability of infarction at each voxel (Pi) for the combined arterial territories was calculated as previously described.1 The probability of sanctuary sites was calculated using the formula probability of sanctuary sites = 1−Pi. Sanctuary sites were identified as regions with a probability of infarction (Pi) <0.1.1 Historical data and current works have alluded to their presence of sanctuary sites.1,13,17,33,35-39 Following proximal MCA occlusion it is well recognized that the highest probability of infarction centers around the striatocapsular region and the centrum semiovale, followed by the insular (see Video 1).24,33,35,37,40,41 Compensatory flow from posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) to MCA through LMA may enable sparing of cortical regions of the frontal and parietal lobes from infarction,1,13,17,33,35-38 following reperfusion. Although we acknowledge inter-individual variability in LMA, we propose that knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the anastomoses as described by Vander Eecken and Adams,13 and others14-16,26 may be useful to increase our understanding of the potential locations of sanctuary sites (see Table 1).1,32-34,39 Table 1 describes the possible locations of sanctuary sites using data from previously published digital atlas of probability of infarction3,32-34 and the sanctuary sites map.1 To assist 5 with anatomic interpretation, a database Talairach Daemon was used to relate the voxel coordinate in the X, Y, and Z planes. (available at http://www.talairach.org/daemon.html). Vascular anatomy of collateral systems During the embryo and fetal stages of ontogenesis, the vascular supply for the brain is exclusively from the internal carotid artery (ICA).42 Pial collaterals develop in early fetal life, connecting branches of the rostral and caudal trunk of the ICA. The rostral trunk of the ICA becomes the ACA medially and MCA laterally and the caudal trunk becomes the PCA.42 The anterior communicating artery (AcomA) forms an anastomotic connection between the two ACA and the posterior communicating artery (PcomA) joins the ICA to the PCA. Following progressive atrophy of the PcomA the vertebral system develops.42 In proximal vessel occlusion, the CoW redistributes blood from posterior to anterior circulation via the PcomA or between hemispheres via the AcomA. In imaging studies, a complete configuration of the circle is reported in less than 42% of people43,44 and its ability to rescue in occlusions distal to CoW via the PcomA has been previously overstated.45 Following MCA occlusion, the CoW is unable to salvage penumbra.2 Perfusion to the MCA territory is instead maintained via recruitment of LMA.2 These arteriole-arteriole anastomoses connect select distal branches of the ACA, MCA, and PCA13,21,25 as either end-to-end or candelabra anastomoses.13,21 Luminal size and number are important factors which determine the ability of LMA to maintain cerebral perfusion.46 In agreement with Heubner,4 Van der Zwan and Hillen10,11 reported diameters as large as 1mm. A computer model of the cerebral circulation has also shown that similar sizes of the LMA were necessary to keep cerebral blood flow above 30%.2 Furthermore, animal models have also shown that LMAs which connect branches of ACA and MCA, have larger luminal size and reduced basal tone and myogenic reactivity compared to pial arterioles which do not.47 Location and Impact of Sanctuary Sites (A) LMA between ACA and MCA Most LMA occur between the ACA and the MCA.9,13,18,21-23 These anastomoses are crucial to supporting the metabolic needs of important motor and somatosensory areas (see Table 1).1,3 A frequent occurrence is the presence of double anastomotic channels in the pre-central, central and post-central regions.14 The posterior internal frontal artery, a branch of the callosomarginal artery forms end-end anastomosis in the pre-central sulcus with the precentral artery13,16,17 (from the MCA) to supply the anterior border of the precentral gyrus.1,14 In the central sulcus, the paracentral artery and the central artery13,16,17 form connections to supply the posterior border of the precentral gyrus14, the anterior border of the postcentral gyrus1,14 and the paracentral lobule.39,48,49 Anastomoses of the superior parietal branch (also known as precuneal branch) with the anterior parietal artery13,14,16,17 lie within the postcentral sulcus to supply the posterior border of the postcentral gyrus1 and superior parietal lobule1 above the intraparietal sulcus. In ACA stroke, these anastomoses limit ACA infarct topography and result in sparing of M1 fiber tracts3,49 which may impact motor outcome. These LMA may also be important following MCA occlusion.50 Inferomedially, sanctuary sites exist in the orbital gyrus and gyrus rectus1,3,36 due to anastomoses from the medial and lateral orbitofrontal arteries.13,14 The low probability of infarction of the rostral aspect of the superior frontal gyrus39 may be due to compensation from fine transverse or oblique connections between the frontopolar branch (of the ACA)16 with the 7 orbito-frontalis branch (of the MCA).13,16 Following occlusion of the MCA33 or ACA,3 the low probability of infarction of the middle frontal gyrus3,33 (see Table 1) is likely due to anastomoses between the anterior and middle internal frontal arteries16,21,26 (from the ACA) and the superior branches of the orbitofrontal artery (from the MCA)9,13,16,21,26 which lie in the superior frontal sulcus. (B) LMA between ACA and PCA Medially, LMA between the terminal branches of the pericallosal artery14 or precuneal artery13,14,16,17 (from the ACA) and the posterior callosal branch of the parieto-occipital artery (from the PCA)13,14,16,17,21 may account for the low probability of infarction in the precuneus1,3 and posterior cingulate gyrus1,3 following ACA stroke and the cuneus1,34,51 and splenium34,52 following PCA stroke. (C) LMA between MCA and PCA End to end anastomosis between the posterior parietal,16 posterior temporal13 or angular artery13,16,17,21 (from the MCA) with the parieto-occipital artery13,16,17,21 (from the PCA) lie within the inferior portion of the intraparietal sulcus or superior portion on the parieto-occipital sulcus.9,13 Following occlusion of the MCA, they may account for the low probability of infarction seen in the supramarginal and angular gyrus1,33 and following PCA occlusion they may explain the presence of sanctuary sites in the superior and middle occipital gyrus1,51 and the inferior parietal lobule1 (Table 1). (D) LMA between ACA and contralateral ACA Finally, in almost two thirds of cases,53 the distal branches of the ACA extend to the medial surface of the contralateral hemisphere and can form anastomoses with branches of the pericallosal16,21 and callosomarginal arteries13,21 including the precuneal and paracentral arteries.9,13 These branches may further support blood flow to the precuneus, paracentral lobule, posterior cingulate gyrus1,39 and splenium.53 Haemodynamic factors affecting LMA Based on simulation studies, in the absence of vessel occlusion, low flow within LMA occurs due to the lack of pressure difference between arterial territories. Following obstruction of an artery, the subsequent drop in blood flow and a fall in pressure in downstream vessels results in reversal in flow direction and hemodynamic recruitment of LMA surrounding the occluded vessel.54 This retrograde flow produces an increase in blood flow through LMA via an increase in lumen diameter and a fall in vascular resistance. This helps to maintain cerebral perfusion and support the penumbra until recanalization and reperfusion.54 LMA give rise to penetrating arterioles which pierce the cortical surface and enter the brain substance to supply the capillaries in the microvascular sub-surface bed.26,55,56 Each penetrating arteriole forms a vascular unit. As these arterioles lack anastomoses,57 they can leave subcortical structures vulnerable to profound ischemia if they are occluded.55 In animal models, flow reversal in LMA and active dilation of penetrating arterioles lying close to an LMA restores blood flow to regions of ischemia following MCA occlusion.56 In contrast, regions further away from LMA are less able to provide compensatory flow, resulting stasis of blood in penetrating arterioles with an increased risk of infarction.55 A combination of genetic and vascular risk factors likely accounts for the significant inter-individual variation seen in leptomeningeal collaterals. We will review these in the following paragraph. Genetic and vascular risk factors affecting LMA In mice, genetic background is a major determinant of this variation, with approximately 80% found localized to the Rabep2 gene.58 Collaterogenesis, can occur secondary to hypoxia and vessel occlusion59 and was abolished in mice lacking Rabep2 gene.58 Lower arterial oxygen levels in pial watershed areas, is thought to stimulate collaterogenesis through increased expression of Rabep2 gene and increased signaling of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A).58,60 It is unclear at present whether similar genetic polymorphisms will be discovered which account for the variation in collaterals seen in humans. Several vascular risk factors have been shown to influence the development of collaterals. Age is the most important risk factor for ischemic stroke,61 and its influence on collaterals has been studied in both humans62-65 and animal models.66,67 In mice models, with increasing age, a process known as collateral 'rarefaction' can occur.66 This results in a reduction in the number and luminal diameter of collaterals leading to increased vascular resistance. Additionally, animal models have shown that aging is believed to impair the capacity of pial arteries to dilate.66,67 Collateral rarefaction can also occur in the presence of vascular endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors.67,68 Hypertension, has been shown to reduce the development and compensatory capacity of collaterals following vessel occlusion in both animal models47,67,69,70 and humans.65,71-73 In spontaneously hypertensive rat models, LMA responded with increased 10 myogenic vasoconstriction in response to elevated pressure.47,70 The resulting vascular dysfunction and vasoconstriction compromises collateral flow and can increase susceptibility to ischemic injury. An important system in the pathogenesis of hypertension is the renin-angiotensin system. Treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and subsequent lowering of ANG II levels prevented vasoconstriction of LMA and reversed vascular dysfunction, independent of blood pressure lowering.74 Hyperlipidemia through the formation of atherosclerosis, is also believed to stimulate ischemic preconditioning and collaterogenesis.75 Favorable collaterals have been associated with hyperlipidemia in humans.62 In mouse models, statins have been shown to upregulate endothelial nitric oxide synthetase resulting in increased cerebral blood flow and reduction in infarct size.76-78 However, the presence of prior statin use has shown conflicting results in humans, with some studies suggesting statin treatment prior to stroke resulted in the presence of higher collaterals grades on angiography,79 even in those with cardioembolic stroke.80 Whilst other studies have shown poorer collaterals in stroke patients with prior-stroke statin use.62,63 Poor collateral status and faster evolution from penumbra to infarct core has also been associated with acute and chronic hyperglycemia,65,72,73,81,82 in patients with type 2 diabetes,83,84 and in smokers.62 Improving our understanding of clinical factors which impact collaterogenesis or collateral rarefaction may enable us to develop effective therapies in the future. Collateral Therapeutics Despite a plethora of studies investigating neuroprotection agents in stroke, successful augmentation of collateral haemodynamics following vessel occlusion has provided mixed results, with some interventions showing limited success.85,86 Early trials of head positioning to improve cerebral perfusion in ischaemic stroke were neutral, but showed that the fully supine position was safe.87 More recently pre-clinical trials88 and clinical trials89,90 investigating head positioning in large artery occlusion have shown more promise. In a pre-clinical randomized trial, positioning with head down using a 15° tilt resulted in increased cerebral blood flow, reduced infarct volume and improved clinical outcome88 in rodent models with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Unsurprisingly this benefit was greater in subjects with good collaterals, but even a mild improvement was seen in cases with poor collaterals.91 In humans, studies have shown head-down positioning (-20o Trendelenburg position) was well tolerated and resulted in a modest improvement in cerebral perfusion on imaging.92 A randomized multicenter trial of prolonged head down positioning in patients with large artery atherosclerosis of the anterior circulation not suitable for reperfusion therapies, also showed that it was safe but was statistically neutral for the primary outcome of ninety day functional independence (modified Rankin scale 0–2).89 In contrast, head positioning when used prior to endovascular clot retrieval in patients with large vessel occlusion, has been shown in a small randomized clinical trial to reduce neurological deterioration, defined as an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 2 or more.90 Pre-clinical studies in animal models have shown that induced hypertension can improve cerebral blood flow through collaterals and reduce infarct volume.93,94 In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, therapeutic induced hypertension using phenylephrine in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke ineligible for reperfusion therapies was associated with early neurological improvement and functional independence at ninety days.95 Blood pressure augmentation may be beneficial in selected patients95 but further randomized controlled trials are needed to define its safety profile and optimal use. Implications and Future directions The presence of LMA between cortical branches of the ACA and MCA may support blood flow to the superficial compartment to maintain penumbra (see Figure 1). Therefore, the concept of sanctuary sites1 may provide a framework for identifying patients with a large core96-99 who have the ability to reach a good functional outcome following treatment with clot retrieval. Imaging studies with MRI suggest that in some cases penumbra can exist up to 48 hours.100 Development of adjuvant medical therapies which augment blood flow through LMA101 may enable extension of current time windows for reperfusion therapies and allow successful treatment of patients who require long distance transfer to a comprehensive stroke center for thrombectomy.102 Pharmacological augmentation of blood flow through established LMA may also be sufficient to improve clinical outcome in cases of large and mediumdistal vessel occlusions not amenable to suitable for endovascular clot retrieval101,103-106 or where thrombolysis is contraindicated.101 Conclusion We have identified regions with a low probability of infarction due to the functionality of LMA. In the modern era of reperfusion therapy, knowledge of the locations of sanctuary sites may help guide therapeutic management. Augmenting collaterals to support blood flow to sanctuary sites may be beneficial when used in conjunction with endovascular clot retrieval, especially if there are delays to treatment. Table 1 – Location of possible sanctuary sites (regions of low probability of infarction due to blood supply from leptomeningeal anastomoses). Voxel coordinates in the X, Y, and Z planes represent their location on a standard brain template. Figure 1 – An axial image with a schematic representation of the topography of sanctuary sites created using published digital maps of cortical stroke with documented vessel occlusion. Leptomeningeal collaterals may support blood flow to the superficial compartment to maintain penumbra. Regions (red/orange) have a low probability of infarction and a high probability of sanctuary sites. Regions (blue/green) have a high probability of infarction and a low probability of sanctuary sites. Topography of probability of sanctuary sites (red/orange) and infarct (blue/green). Leptomeningeal collaterals may support blood flow to the superficial compartment to maintain penumbra. Video 1 - A digital atlas of probability of infarction following arterial occlusion of the anterior, middle and posterior cerebral artery. Regions with highest probability of infarction (red) are seen in the striatocapsular, insular, and centrum semiovale in the MCA stroke, anterior cingulate and superior frontal gyrus in ACA stroke and lingual gyrus in PCA stroke. 9 Table 1 – Location of possible sanctuary sites (regions of low probability of infarction due to blood supply from leptomeningeal anastomoses). Voxel coordinates in the X, Y, and Z planes represent their location on a standard brain template. Sanctuary site Leptomeningeal collateral Gyrus Voxel coordinates (X,Y,Z) Cortex Function ACA Probability of infarction Probability of sanctuary sites MCA Probability of infarction Probability of sanctuary sites PCA Probability of infarction Probability of sanctuary sites Gyrus rectus 7.6, 36.0, -17.9 Orbitofrontal cortex Unclear function Medial Orbitofrontal artery 0.02 0.98 Lateral Orbitofrontal artery NA NA NA NA NA Orbitofrontal gyrus 17.2, 47.8, -14.2 Orbitofrontal cortex Cognitive process of decision making Medial Orbitofrontal artery 0.02 0.98 Lateral Orbitofrontal artery NA NA NA NA NA Middle frontal gyrus 36.3, 33.0, 33.7 Premotor cortex Motor planning Posterior internal frontal artery 0.05 0.95 Precentral artery 0.05 0.95 NA NA NA Precentral gyrus 40.0, -8.3, 52.1 Primary motor cortex Motor Paracentral artery N/A N/A Central artery 0.05 0.95 NA NA NA Postcentral gyrus 40.0, -25.2, 52.9 Primary sensory cortex Sensory Superior parietal artery NA NA Anterior parietal artery 0.02 0.98 NA NA NA Superior parietal lobule 25.3, -59.1, 62.5 Superior parietal lobule Attention and Spatial orientation Superior parietal artery NA NA Anterior parietal artery 0.02 0.98 NA NA NA Inferior parietal lobule 45.2, -46.6, 49.2 Somatosensory cortex Sensory processing and integration NA NA NA Posterior parietal artery 0.03 0.97 Parieto-occipital artery NA NA Supramarginal gyrus 56.2, -31.9, 34.4 Somatosensory cortex Phonological processing NA NA NA Posterior parietal artery 0.07 0.93 Parieto-occipital artery NA NA Angular gyrus 44.4, -59.9, 38.9 NA NA NA Angular artery 0.05 0.95 Parieto-occipital artery NA NA Paracentral lobule 3.9, -37.0, 68.3 Somatosensory association cortex Somatosensory function contralateral lower limb Paracentral artery 0.01 0.99 Central artery NA NA NA NA NA Posterior cingulate gyrus 6.8, -42.2, 21.9 Paralimbic cortical structure Default mode network Posterior pericallosal artery NA NA NA NA NA Parieto-occipital artery (callosal branch) 0.01 0.99 Precuneus 9.0, -56.2, 44.0 Superior parietal lobule Episodic memory, default mode network (resting consciousness) Posterior pericallosal artery or precuneal artery 0.01 0.99 NA NA NA Parieto-occipital artery (callosal branch) NA NA Cuneus 12.7, -79.8, 28.5 Visual cortex Superior optic radiations Posterior pericallosal artery precuneal artery NA NA NA NA NA Parieto-occipital artery (callosal branch) 0.02 0.98 Superior occipital gyrus 23.1, -80.5, 30.7 Occipital cortex Visual recognition of objects NA NA NA Posterior temporal artery 0.02 0.98 Parieto-occipital artery NA NA Middle occipital gyrus 36.3, -79.8, 18.9 Occipital cortex NA NA NA Posterior temporal artery 0.04 0.96 Parieto-occipital artery NA NA 10 Figure 1 – An axial image with a schematic representation of the topography of sanctuary sites created using published digital maps of cortical stroke with documented vessel occlusion. Leptomeningeal collaterals may support blood flow to the superficial compartment to maintain penumbra. This region has a low probability of infarction and a high probability of sanctuary site (red/orange). Regions (blue/green) have a high probability of infarction and a low probability of sanctuary sites. Topography of probability of sanctuary sites (- red/orange) and infarct (- blue/green). Leptomeningeal collaterals may support blood flow to the superficial compartment to maintain penumbra.