Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 17 October 2025

Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1608745

Association of serum bicarbonate with 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Yichen LiuYichen Liu1Shuchang ZhouShuchang Zhou1Yingchun MaoYingchun Mao1Qing HuQing Hu1Zhixin LiZhixin Li1Zhihui Li
Zhihui Li2*
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The 990th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Zhumadian, Henan, China
  • 2Beijing Institute of Radiation and Medicine, Beijing, China

Objectives: Serum bicarbonate concentration is a predictor of adverse outcomes in various diseases. However, its role in forecasting outcomes specifically for patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis remains unclear. This study examines the relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with epilepsy and sepsis who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: Clinical data from 1,271 patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis were retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (2008–2022) for retrospective analysis. The primary outcomes measured were mortality rates at 28 and 90 days. We used multivariate Cox regression analysis, restricted cubic splines, threshold effect analysis, and survival curves to assess the impact of serum bicarbonate levels on 28-day and 90-day mortality.

Results: Mortality rates for patients with epilepsy and sepsis were 21.4% at 28 days and 28.6% at 90 days. Two distinct non-linear relationships were observed between serum bicarbonate levels and mortality rates at 28 and 90 days. Below their respective threshold points, each unit increase in serum bicarbonate was associated with a decrease in mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.941, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9–0.985, p = 0.0084 at 28 days, and HR 0.952, 95% CI 0.915–0.99, p = 0.0144 at 90 days]. Above the thresholds, increases in bicarbonate levels were linked with elevated mortality risk (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.979–1.236, p = 0.109 at 28 days, and HR 1.112, 95% CI 1.002–1.235, p = 0.0464 at 90 days). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed statistically significant survival differences at 28 and 90 days across serum bicarbonate levels (p = 0.00015), with normal levels correlating with higher survival rates.

Conclusion: Two unique non-liner U-shaped relationships were identified between serum bicarbonate levels and mortality at 28 and 90 days in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis. The lowest mortality rates were observed at approximately 25.0 and 25.9 mEq/L, respectively.

1 Introduction

Sepsis is characterized by an excessive systemic inflammatory response to infection, leading to physiological, pathological, and biochemical dysregulation that can cause multi-system and multi-organ dysfunction or failure (1). Despite significant advancements in diagnosis and treatment, sepsis remains highly prevalent, especially in high-income countries, with an incidence of approximately 270 cases per 100,000 people per year and an in-hospital mortality rate of 26% (2, 3). Globally, the incidence is estimated at 20 million cases annually, resulting in around 6 million deaths, making sepsis one of the leading causes of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and in-hospital mortality (4, 5). The annual cost of sepsis care in the United States is estimated at $16.7 billion (6).

Sepsis is a major reason for hospital admission among patients with epilepsy (7), a common chronic neurological disorder associated with persistent risk of seizures and affecting approximately 70 million people worldwide. Epilepsy often coexists with cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and psychosocial impairments, elevating the risk of mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety, as well as increasing mortality from various diseases (810). Studies have reported that the relative risk of mortality in epilepsy patients is 2.87 [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.16–3.81; I2 99.7%] and 3.66 (90% CI 2.87–4.66; I2 97.5%), suggesting that high mortality may be associated with chronic degenerative diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, tumors, and potentially with pathophysiological mechanisms leading to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (11). Epilepsy not only results in health complications but also imposes significant economic burdens on society and families. Epidemiological surveys estimate that the annual expenditure on epilepsy in the United States is approximately $12.5 billion (12). Multifactorial regression analysis of national hospital admissions in the United States has shown that patients with epilepsy are more likely to be transferred between hospitals [odds ratio (OR) = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.72–1.81, p < 0.0001], with overall costs being 4% higher (p < 0.0001). In light of the increased adverse outcomes of both conditions, identifying biological predictors of short-term and long-term mortality in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis in the ICU is crucial for risk stratification and optimization of medical resources.

Patients with sepsis often experience hemodynamic instability, leading to inadequate tissue and organ perfusion, which in turn affects serum bicarbonate levels. Serum bicarbonate has recently been recognized as a clinical biomarker for assessing the body’s acid–base balance and predicting disease prognosis (13). Multiple studies have confirmed its role as a predictor of poor outcomes in various diseases, including all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes (14), acute and chronic kidney diseases (15, 16), non-alcoholic liver disease (17), cardiovascular events (18), tumors (19), and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (13). However, limited research has explored the relationship between serum bicarbonate and prognosis in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using data from patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis in the ICU from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. This study aims to determine whether serum bicarbonate levels serve as a reliable predictor of short-term and long-term mortality in ICU patients with epilepsy and sepsis.

2 Methods

2.1 Data source

The MIMIC-IV 3.0 database1 is a publicly accessible database jointly established by the Computational Physiology Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) at Harvard Medical School, and Philips Healthcare. It includes clinical medical data from over 60,000 patients admitted to the BIDMC intensive care units between 2008 and 2022 (20). Access is granted at no cost to researchers who complete the National Institutes of Health’s web-based courses and pass the database-specific examination. As a retrospective cohort study utilizing MIMIC-IV database, without requiring patient informed consent. The authorization code (ID) for this study is 58881017.

2.2 Study population

The study population was identified from the MIMIC-IV 3.0 dataset using SQL (Structured Query Language). Cases were defined as epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases-9), which could appear within the first five diagnostic fields, even if not listed as the primary diagnostic. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Diagnostic consistent with the international Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic standards (21); (2) Age ≥18 years; and (3) Availability of clinical data from the patient’s first day in the ICU. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Missing serum bicarbonate data; (2) Missing anion gap results; (3) Missing data on the lowest hemoglobin concentration; and (4) Missing glucose values. After applying these criteria, clinical data from 1,271 patients were included in the analysis (Figure 1). Data on patient mortality and follow-up duration were also extracted. Missing values for pH and blood lactate levels were imputed using dummy variable methods.

Figure 1
Flowchart depicting patient selection from a study on epilepsy and sepsis in MIMIC-IV data from 2008 to 2022. Initially, 1,299 patients in ICU were included. After excluding 28 patients without necessary data (bicarbonate, hemoglobin, anion gap, serum glucose), 1,271 were eligible. These were categorized based on bicarbonate levels: less than 22 mEq/L (569 patients), 22 to 29 mEq/L (629 patients), and greater than or equal to 29 mEq/L (73 patients).

Figure 1. The flowchart of study participants.

2.3 Study variables

The baseline serum bicarbonate concentration determined was the minimum venous blood bicarbonate value measured on the first day of ICU admission for patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis in the MIMIC-IV database. The normal range for serum bicarbonate was considered 22–30 mEq/L (22). The primary outcomes were 28-day and 90-day mortality rates. Covariates included age, gender, race (white, black, other), lowest hemoglobin concentration, minimum platelet count, maximum white blood cell count, minimum glucose level, maximum serum chloride level, minimum sodium level, maximum blood lactate level, minimum pH from blood gas analysis, maximum anion gap, minimum blood oxygen saturation, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation ( x ¯ ± s ) for normally distributed data or as median (interquartile range, IQR) for skewed data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for normally distributed variables, while the Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to skewed data. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency (n) or percentage (%) and analyzed using Chi-squared tests. The study population was divided into three groups based on serum bicarbonate levels measured on admission to ICU (<22 mEq/L, 22–29 mEq/L, ≥29 mEq/L). Additionally, restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression was conducted with knots at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles of serum bicarbonate concentration to explore the relationship between bicarbonate concentration and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates. A two-piecewise Cox regression model was developed to assess the relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and mortality at 28 days and 90 days. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to compare 28-day and 90-day mortality rates across the three groups. Both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the observed relationships. Adjusted and unadjusted models were used, with covariates selected for adjustment based on literature review and covariate screening analysis (23). Model I adjusted for age and gender, while Model II included additional adjustments for race, hemoglobin concentration, white blood cell count, serum chloride and sodium levels, blood lactate, pH, anion gap, SAPS II, OASIS, and SOFA scores. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI. Threshold effect analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between admission serum bicarbonate levels and mortality at 28 days and 90 days. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.3.1; http://www.Rproject.org), supported by R packages, and Free Statistics software (version 1.9.2; Beijing Fengrui Kelin Medical Technology Co., Ltd.) (23). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Baseline characteristics of the study population

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics as a whole, and stratified by tertiles of bicarbonate concentration of the study population. Of the 1,271 patients, 674 (53.0%) were male and 597 (47.0%) were female, with an average age of 63.0 ± 16.4 years. Within 24 h of ICU admission, the average SAPS II was 38.3 ± 13.2, OASIS averaged 34.7 ± 8.1, and the median SOFA score was 3.0 (IQR 2.0, 4.0). The mean of the lowest bicarbonate concentration measured for the whole study population on first day of ICU admission was 21.6 ± 4.8 mEq/L. The mean of the lowest bicarbonate concentration in each group were 17.6 ± 3.3, 24.2 ± 1.8, and 31.3 ± 2.9 mEq/L, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found among the groups stratified by serum bicarbonate levels for covariates such as race, lowest hemoglobin concentration, lowest platelet count, highest white blood cell count, highest serum chloride level, maximum blood lactate level, pH, maximum anion gap, SAPS II, OASIS, and SOFA (p < 0.05). The overall 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were 21.1 and 28.6%, respectively.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population.

3.2 Relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and survival outcomes

Univariate Cox regression analysis identified risk factors significantly associated with 28-day and 90-day mortality, including age, lowest hemoglobin concentration, highest white blood cell count, minimum glucose level, blood lactate, anion gap, SAPS II, OASIS, SOFA, and serum bicarbonate concentration (p < 0.05). However, gender, race, and other test indices were not associated with 28-day and 90-day mortality rates (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Relationship between single-variable factors and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that serum bicarbonate, as a continuous variable, was associated with reduced the 28-day and 90-day mortality rates in all models (unadjusted model, Model 1, and the fully adjusted Model 2) (Table 3). However, in Model 2, the associations were not statistically significant.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Relationship between serum bicarbonate levels (as a continuous variable and categorized) and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates using adjusted and non-adjusted models.

When serum bicarbonate was categorized, patients with levels <22 mEq/L showed significantly higher 28-day and 90-day mortality rates compared to the baseline group (22–29 mEq/L) (Table 3). In the unadjusted model, the mortality risk increased by 69% for 28-day mortality (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.32–2.18, p < 0.001) and 57% for 90-day mortality (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.27–1.95, p < 0.001). Model 1 (adjusted for age and gender) showed similar increases of 75% (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.36–2.25, p < 0.001) and 62% (HR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.31–2.01, p < 0.001), respectively. In Model 2 (adjusted for all potential confounders), the risk increase remained, but was not statistically significant. Patients with serum bicarbonate levels ≥29 mEq/L showed higher 28-day and 90-day mortality rates across all models, but these results were not statistically significant (Table 3).

3.3 Non-linear association between serum bicarbonate and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates

Multivariable-adjusted restricted cubic splines analysis suggested a U-shaped association between levels of serum bicarbonate on admission and risk of 28-day and 90-day mortality rates (p for nonlinearity <0.05, Figure 2). Specifically, this analysis indicated that as admission serum bicarbonate levels change, the associated mortality rates do not follow a straightforward linear pattern; instead, they exhibit a complex, curvilinear relationship.

Figure 2
Two line graphs labeled A and B compare the hazard ratio of mortality at 28 days and 90 days against bicarbonate levels in mEq/L. Both graphs show a reference point at 22 mEq/L. Graph A, with a non-linearity p-value of 0.002, shows increased hazard ratios at both low and high bicarbonate levels. Graph B, with a p-value of 0.023, displays a similar pattern, with risk increasing away from the reference point. Shaded areas represent confidence intervals.

Figure 2. Non-linear relationship between serum bicarbonate concentrations and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis. A 28 days; B 90 days. Bicarbonate scaled up to 100%.

The piecewise multivariable Cox regression model with two different slopes showed a significant likelihood ratio of less than 0.05, and identified a threshold point at approximately 25.0 mEq/L for 28 days and 25.9 mEq/L for 90 days mortality. This indicates that the relationship is non-linear, with two separate distinct hazard ratios both above and below the turning point. Below the respective threshold, rising bicarbonate levels are correlated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality at both 28 days (HR = 0.941, p < 0.05) and 90 days (HR = 0.952, p < 0.05). Above the threshold, rising bicarbonate levels are linked to a non-significant rise in 28-day mortality risk (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.979–1.236, p > 0.05), yet a statistically significant 11.2% increase in 90-day mortality risk (HR = 1.112, 95% CI 1.002–1.235, p < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Threshold effect analysis of serum bicarbonate levels by different groups.

3.4 Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis

Kaplan–Meier survival curves, plotted using admission serum bicarbonate levels as a categorical variable, showed significant differences in both 28- and 90-day survival rates between groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 3). Compared with the baseline serum bicarbonate group (22–29 mEq/L), patients with serum bicarbonate concentrations below 22 mEq/L or above 29 mEq/L demonstrated a higher risk of mortality rates, highlighting the association between serum bicarbonate homeostasis and survival (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Two Kaplan-Meier survival plots show survival probability over time categorized by bicarbonate levels in milliequivalents per liter. Chart A depicts survival for twenty-eight days, with lower probabilities for bicarbonate levels below twenty-two. Chart B illustrates ninety-day survival, showing similar trends. Both plots display significant p-values and include data tables indicating the number at risk for each bicarbonate group at various time points.

Figure 3. Survival curves showing the relationship between serum bicarbonate levels measured on ICU admission and 28-day and 90-day mortality rates. A 28 days; B 90 days.

4 Discussion

This retrospective cohort study demonstrated that serum bicarbonate levels measured at time of ICU admission are an independent prognostic factor for 28-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis. Results from the multivariable Cox regression models, Kaplan Meier survival curves, cubic spline analysis, and threshold effect analysis demonstrate a non-linear U-shaped relationship between bicarbonate concentration and mortality. Serum bicarbonate analysed as a continuous variable showed that lower serum bicarbonate concentration significantly increased 28-day and 90-day mortality rates. The finding of reduced short- and long-term mortality with increasing bicarbonate levels, when treated as a continuous variable, was statistically non-significant and likely influenced by the relatively small sample size of patients with elevated serum bicarbonate concentrations. When serum bicarbonate was categorized, patients with levels <22 mEq/L demonstrated significantly higher risks of both short-term and long-term mortality compared to those in the 22–29 mEq/L range. Similarly, levels ≥29 mEq/L were associated with increased mortality risk, though these results were not statistically significant. Threshold effect analysis identified a turning point 25.0 mEq/L for 28-day and 25.9 mEq/L for 90-day mortality, where increasing bicarbonate levels below this point are associated with reduced mortality, and increasing levels above this point are linked to increased mortality. These results align with previous findings regarding the U-shaped relationship between bicarbonate and mortality among critically ill patients. Libório et al. (24), reported a U-shaped relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Specifically, their study identified two serum bicarbonate concentration nodes, at 25 mEq/L and 30 mEq/L, that correspond to this U-shaped pattern. These observations are consistent with the findings of the current studies. Notably, no previous studies have explored the specific relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and 28-day or 90-day mortality rates in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis.

The international Sepsis-3 consensus defines sepsis as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection” (21). This dysfunction leads to hemodynamic failure and abnormal cell metabolism, leading to anaerobic glycolysis in terminal organs and systemic lactic acidosis (25). Sepsis-related organ dysfunction often involves liver and kidney impairment, which exacerbates systemic acidosis (26). Liver damage reduces lactate clearance, while acute kidney injury leads to hydrogen ion retention and bicarbonate loss, intensifying acid–base imbalance (25). Metabolic acidosis, characterized by reduced serum bicarbonate levels, disrupts acid–base homeostasis and contributes to adverse clinical outcomes. Lower serum bicarbonate concentrations have been linked to a higher incidence of acute cardiovascular events and mortality rate within 28 days due to ischemic cardiogenic shock (25, 27). They have also been associated with a higher risk of progression to kidney transplantation or a 50% reduction in glomerular filtration rate in children with acute kidney disease (28). Additionally, they have been significantly correlated with all-cause and cancer mortality rates in patients with type 2 diabetes (19). Low bicarbonate may be related to acidosis, which increases intracellular acidity and releases intracellular protein-bound iron, leading to the formation of hydroxyl radicals that cause oxidative stress and tissue damage (29). Moreover, acidosis activates inflammatory gene expressions in endothelial cells, mediating endothelial plasma leakage, leukocyte recruitment, and exacerbated tissue injury (30). Given these mechanisms, serum bicarbonate is an effective clinical predictor of mortality in sepsis patients, with lower levels strongly associated with increased in-hospital mortality rates compared to those with normal or higher (31). Conversely, elevated serum bicarbonate levels (above 30 mEq/L) have also been associated with increased mortality risks by 21% in critically ill patients (24), Bicarbonate depletion reflects worsening sepsis-related organ dysfunction related to sepsis, whereas bicarbonate excess may suggest metabolic alkalosis, resulting in an increase in pH, a leftward shift of the oxygenated hemoglobin dissociation curve, electrolyte imbalance, and supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias (32). It thus serves as an effective clinical predictor of mortality in sepsis patients.

Additionally, bicarbonate consumption reflects lactic acid accumulation during seizures, leading to metabolic acidosis, simultaneously activating acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC1a) in both neurons and astrocytes, thereby increasing the frequency of spontaneous seizures. Meanwhile, ASIC1a promotes the activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and exacerbates neuronal death caused by acidosis, leading to calcium ion influx (33, 34). Olaciregui Dague et al. (35), reported significantly lower serum bicarbonate levels (median: 22.6 mmol/L, range 7.1–33.2 mmol/L) in 165 patients with epilepsy following seizures compared with 58 controls with non-epileptic seizure-like events. In the other hand, excessive serum bicarbonate levels can lead to metabolic alkalosis and may strongly predict mortality and adverse functional outcomes in patients with status epilepticus (36). Previous studies have reported that HCO3− plays an important role in neuronal plasticity, as the transmembrane gradient of HCO3− and Cl− determines whether the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ergic signal is depolarizing and excitatory or hyperpolarizing and inhibitory (37, 38). During an epileptic seizure, the consistent depolarization driven by the GABAAR-mediated HCO3− current boosts the activity-dependent Cl− influx into neurons, thereby directly triggering excitation in this state (39). In this study, Kaplan–Meier survival curve analyses revealed that serum bicarbonate levels below 22 mEq/L or above 29 mEq/L were associated with increased mortality at both 28 days and 90 days, corroborating earlier findings. The research demonstrated not only that both depleted and excessive bicarbonate levels are associated with mortality in both sepsis and epilepsy but also reinforced the utility of serum bicarbonate as a biomarker in patients with sepsis and concurrent epilepsy. Individuals with serum bicarbonate levels below 22 mEq/L or above 29 mEq/L can be identified as high-risk at an early stage. This early identification allows for more targeted and timely interventions, such as closer monitoring of vital signs, more frequent laboratory tests, and early adjustment of treatment plans. However, given the complexity of the pathogenesis of epilepsy and concurrent sepsis, a single biomarker may not be adequate for accurately predicting prognosis. Utilizing a combination of serum bicarbonate alongside markers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate could enhance the precision of risk assessment and prognosis prediction.

This study possesses several advantages. Firstly, it employs data from the well-established MIMIC-IV 3.0 database, which is a rich and reliable source of ICU patient information. Moreover, this research employed appropriate statistical methods to verify the curve relationships of the association among serum bicarbonate concentration and short-term or long-term mortality rates, rather than a simple straight-line relationship. Lastly, we have identified the threshold for the smooth curve, which may contribute to suggesting to ICU physicians a better understanding and management of changes in the serum bicarbonate threshold of critically ill patients. Nevertheless, some limitations need to be taken into account. Firstly, as with other retrospective cohort studies, residual confounding may persist despite comprehensive adjustments for known confounding factors. Secondly, the data were solely sourced from the single-center MIMIC-IV 3.0 database, limiting the generalizability of the findings to broader populations. Thirdly, only the lowest serum bicarbonate levels during the first day of admission to ICU were analyzed. This approach does not account for dynamic changes in serum bicarbonate levels throughout the ICU stay, which may have significant implications for patient outcomes. Specifically, fluctuations in bicarbonate levels over time might reflect different pathophysiological processes effects that were not captured in our analysis. Future studies should consider longitudinal measurements of serum bicarbonate levels to better understand their prognostic significance and potential role in guiding clinical interventions.

5 Conclusion

There were two separate non-linear U-shaped relationships between serum bicarbonate levels at ICU admission and both short-term and long-term mortality rates in patients with concurrent sepsis and epilepsy rates. Compared to the normal range of serum bicarbonate concentration, both the 28-day and 90-day mortality risks were increased when the serum bicarbonate level deviates from the normal value. The optimal serum bicarbonate values associated with the lowest short-term and long-term mortality risks are 25.0 and 25.9 mEq/L, respectively. These results suggest a useful marker for risk stratification of patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis in the ICU, and underscore the importance of maintaining optimal serum bicarbonate levels to improve survival outcomes in these patients.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author contributions

YL: Writing – original draft. SZ: Writing – original draft. YM: Writing – original draft. QH: Writing – original draft. ZxL: Writing – original draft. ZhL: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Key Project of the 990th Hospital (2024ZDXM02).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

1. Krzyzaniak, K, Krion, R, Szymczyk, A, Stepniewska, E, and Sieminski, M. Exploring neuroprotective agents for Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24:10780. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310780

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fleischmann, C, Scherag, A, Adhikari, NK, Hartog, CS, Tsaganos, T, Schlattmann, P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:259–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zheng, R, Qian, S, Shi, Y, Lou, C, Xu, H, and Pan, J. Association between triglyceride-glucose index and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2023) 22:307. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02041-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Purcarea, A, and Sovaila, S. Sepsis, a 2020 review for the internist. Rom J Intern Med. (2020) 58:129–37. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2020-0012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Catarina, AV, Branchini, G, Bettoni, L, De Oliveira, JR, and Nunes, FB. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: from pathophysiology to Progress in experimental studies. Mol Neurobiol. (2021) 58:2770–9. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02303-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ye, L, Feng, M, Lin, Q, Li, F, and Lyu, J. Analysis of pathogenic factors on the death rate of sepsis patients. PLoS One. (2023) 18:e0287254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kwon, CS, Wong, B, Agarwal, P, Lin, JY, Mazumdar, M, Dhamoon, M, et al. Nonelective hospital admissions, discharge disposition, and health services utilization in epilepsy patients: a population-based study. Epilepsia. (2020) 61:1969–78. doi: 10.1111/epi.16642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Thijs, RD, Surges, R, O'Brien, TJ, and Sander, JW. Epilepsy in adults. Lancet. (2019) 393:689–701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32596-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. March, L, Margolis, DJ, Marks, GB, Murray, CJL, Vos, T, Lozano, R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. (2012) 380:2197–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Manford, M. Recent advances in epilepsy. J Neurol. (2017) 264:1811–24. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8394-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Nevalainen, O, Ansakorpi, H, Simola, M, Raitanen, J, Isojärvi, J, Artama, M, et al. Epilepsy-related clinical characteristics and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. (2014) 83:1968–77. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Li, CC, Chang, CC, Cherng, YG, Lin, CS, Yeh, CC, Chang, YC, et al. Risk and outcomes of diabetes in patients with epilepsy. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:18888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98340-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Huang, X, and Zhang, Y. Relationship between serum bicarbonate levels and the risk of death within 30 days in ICU patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. (2023) 14:1125359. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1125359

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chubb, SAP, Davis, WA, and Davis, TME. Serum bicarbonate concentration and the risk of death in type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle diabetes study phase II. Acta Diabetol. (2023) 60:1333–42. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02130-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kendrick, J, Chonchol, M, You, Z, and Jovanovich, A. Lower serum bicarbonate is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. J Nephrol. (2021) 34:433–9. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00747-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Blijdorp, CJ, Severs, D, Musterd-Bhaggoe, UM, Gansevoort, RT, Zietse, R, Hoorn, EJ, et al. Serum bicarbonate is associated with kidney outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2021) 36:2248–55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ito, J, Lemus, H, and Wu, T. Serum phosphorus, serum bicarbonate, and renal function in relation to liver CYP1A2 activity. Diagnostics (Basel). (2023) 13:2996. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182996

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Dobre, M, Pajewski, NM, Beddhu, S, Chonchol, M, Hostetter, TH, Li, P, et al. Serumbicarbonate and cardiovascular events in hypertensive adults: results from the systolic blood pressure intervention trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2020) 35:1377–84. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Li, Y, Gao, R, Zhao, B, and Zhang, Y. Low serum bicarbonate levels increase the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2022) 107:3055–65. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac504

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Johnson, AE, Pollard, TJ, Shen, L, Lehman, LW, Feng, M, Ghassemi, M, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data. (2016) 24:160035. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW, Shankar-Hari, M, Annane, D, Bauer, M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. (2016) 315:801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ress, KL, Koerbin, G, Li, L, Chesher, D, Bwititi, P, and Horvath, AR. Reference intervals for venous blood gas measurement in adults. Clin Chem Lab Med. (2020) 59:947–54. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1224

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mao, Y, Zhu, S, and Geng, Y. Association between serum calcium and in-hospital mortality in critical patients with multiple myeloma: a cohort study. Hematology. (2022) 27:795–801. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2095948

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Libório, AB, Noritomi, DT, Leite, TT, de Melo Bezerra, CT, de Faria, ER, and Kellum, JA. Increased serum bicarbonate in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis. Intensive Care Med. (2015) 41:479–86. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3649-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wigger, O, Bloechlinger, S, Berger, D, Häner, J, Zanchin, T, Windecker, S, et al. Baseline serum bicarbonate levels independently predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients with ischaemic cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. (2018) 7:45–52. doi: 10.1177/2048872616683526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Vincent, JL, Quintairos E Silva, A, Couto, L Jr, and Taccone, FS. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. (2016) 20:257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1403-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Wesson, DE. Serum bicarbonate as a cardiovascular risk factor: evolving from ‘non-traditional’? Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2020) 35:1282–5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Brown, DD, Roem, J, Ng, DK, Reidy, KJ, Kumar, J, Abramowitz, MK, et al. Low serum bicarbonate and CKD progression in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2020) 15:755–65. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07060619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bandyopadhyay, U, Das, D, and Banerjee, RK. Reactive oxygen species: oxidative damage and pathogenesis. Curr Sci. (1999) 77:658–66. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10939

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Dong, L, Li, Z, Leffler, NR, Asch, AS, Chi, JT, and Yang, LV. Acidosis activation of the proton-sensing GPR4 receptor stimulates vascular endothelial cell inflammatory responses revealed by transcriptome analysis. PLoS One. (2013) 8:e61991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061991

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Paudel, R, Bissell, B, Dogra, P, Morris, PE, and Chaaban, S. Serum bicarbonate: reconsidering the importance of a neglected biomarker in predicting clinical outcomes in sepsis. Cureus. (2022) 14:e24012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Achanti, A, and Szerlip, HM. Acid–base disorders in the critically ill patient. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2023) 18:102–12. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04500422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Cheng, Y, Zhang, W, Li, Y, Jiang, T, Mamat, B, Zhang, Y, et al. The role of ASIC1a in epilepsy: a potential therapeutic target. Curr Neuropharmacol. (2021) 19:1855–64. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210402102232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Singh, S, Singh, TG, Rehni, AK, Sharma, V, Singh, M, and Kaur, R. Reviving mitochondrial bioenergetics: a relevant approach in epilepsy. Mitochondrion. (2021) 58:213–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2021.03.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Olaciregui Dague, K, Surges, R, Litmathe, J, Villa, L, Brokmann, J, Schulz, JB, et al. The discriminative value of blood gas analysis parameters in the differential diagnosis of transient disorders of consciousness. J Neurol. (2018) 265:2106–13. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8967-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Misirocchi, F, Quintard, H, Seeck, M, and De Stefano, P. Metabolic alkalosis: a new red flag in status epilepticus. J Neurol. (2024) 271:6172–80. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12603-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Quade, BN, Parker, MD, and Occhipinti, R. The therapeutic importance of acid-base balance. Biochem Pharmacol. (2021) 183:114278. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114278

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. McMoneagle, E, Zhou, J, Zhang, S, Huang, W, Josiah, SS, Ding, K, et al. Neuronal K+-Cl− cotransporter KCC2 as a promising drug target for epilepsy treatment. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2024) 45:1–22. doi: 10.1038/s41401-023-01149-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Menzikov, SA, Zaichenko, DM, Moskovtsev, AA, Morozov, SG, and Kubatiev, AA. Massive activation of GABAA receptors: rundown, ionic and neurodegenerative consequences. Biomolecules. (2025) 15:1003. doi: 10.3390/biom15071003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bicarbonate, sepsis, epilepsy, mortality, intensive care

Citation: Liu Y, Zhou S, Mao Y, Hu Q, Li Z and Li Z (2025) Association of serum bicarbonate with 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with epilepsy and concurrent sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. Front. Neurol. 16:1608745. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1608745

Received: 09 April 2025; Accepted: 26 September 2025;
Published: 17 October 2025.

Edited by:

Zilong Zhao, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Tongning Wu, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, China
Ivan Szergyuk, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2025 Liu, Zhou, Mao, Hu, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhihui Li, bDM1MjEwMjUwMTVAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.