Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 28 July 2025

Sec. Neurological Biomarkers

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1608763

High erythropoietin levels are associated with low neurofilament light levels in simulated high altitude: a further hint for neuroprotection by erythropoietin

  • 1Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 3Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 4Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 5Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 6Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Background: Erythropoietin (EPO) plays a crucial role in the early adaption to high altitude and is possibly involved in neuroprotection. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is an established marker of neuroaxonal damage.

Objective: To investigate whether EPO dynamics in simulated high altitude are linked to neuroaxonal damage as measured by NfL.

Methods: Sixty-three healthy subjects were exposed to simulated altitude of 4,500 m for 12 h in a normobaric hypoxic chamber at the University of Innsbruck. Clinical data (heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation) were assessed before and 3 h after high altitude exposure; plasma samples were drawn before (measurement (M) 1) and after 12 h (M2). The levels of EPO and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α were quantified using commercially available ELISA kits. NfL concentrations were measured using the Simoa SR-X Analyzer, and NfL Z scores calculated using age- and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted reference values.

Results: EPO significantly increased after 12 h (M2: 10.12 [7.86–14.06] mU/mL vs. M1: 4.17 [2.99–5.67] mU/mL, p < 0.001), while HIF-1α did not significantly change (p = 0.409). Subjects with high EPO levels at M2 showed significantly lower NfL concentrations (5.85 [4.15–6.85] pg/mL vs. 6.73 [4.70–8.64] pg/mL, p = 0.030) as well as lower NfL Z scores (0.64 [−0.88–1.17] vs. 0.95 [0.25–1.48], p = 0.040) than those with low EPO levels. The extent of heart rate increase showed a positive correlation with EPO levels at M2 (rs = 0.322, p = 0.011).

Conclusion: Higher EPO concentrations were associated with lower NfL levels. This might further substantiate the hypothesis of a neuroprotective role of EPO.

Introduction

Exposure to high altitude carries a risk due to various reasons including the decrease in oxygen partial pressure. Physiological ways to cope with hypoxia comprise increase of ventilation and heart rate, as well as production of red blood cells (RBC) (13). Nevertheless, this adaption is highly variable depending on the absolute height reached, the degree of acclimatization and the time to reach high altitude (4, 5). If adaption fails, high-altitude illness spanning a spectrum from acute mountain sickness (AMS) to high altitude pulmonary (HAPE) and/or cerebral edema (HACE) may occur (6, 7).

Erythropoietin (EPO) plays a key role in the adaption to high altitude hypoxia (3, 8) and acts as an anti-inflammatory mediator (9, 10). Its production is mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α (11). A neuroprotective effect of EPO has been proposed (10, 12, 13), even though data on this are contradictory (14, 15) and neuroprotection is difficult to measure.

Neurofilament light (NfL) is an established marker of neuroaxonal damage (16), which has proven its potential in several neurological diseases, including brain hypoxia (17). While there are studies on EPO levels in high altitude, data on a possible link between EPO and NfL levels as marker of neuroaxonal damage are lacking.

Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether EPO and NfL dynamics in simulated altitude are interlinked and may substantiate the proposed neuroprotective role of EPO.

Methods

A detailed description of the study design has been previously published (18, 19). Briefly, a cohort of 63 healthy subjects was recruited at the University of Innsbruck. Subjects who had visited high altitude areas prior to the study (≥2,500 m for a daytrip within 14 days prior to study initiation, >24 h within the last month before study participation, or permanent residency in heights of ≥1,000 m) were not eligible. Also, subjects with reported history of neurological, cardiological, pulmonary or psychiatric diseases were excluded. For the present analysis, only remaining samples from this prior study were used (18, 19).

After a first check-up, all subjects stayed in a normobaric hypoxic chamber located at the Department of Sports Science, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria, for 12 h simulating an approximate altitude of 4,500 m with an artificial oxygen level of 12.6%.

Demographic (age and sex) and basic clinical data [body mass index (BMI), heart rate in beats per minute (bmp), and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2)] were assessed prior to entering the hypoxic chamber. Measurement of heart rate and SaO2 was repeated after 3 h in simulated high altitude. All heart rate and SaO2 measurements were performed standardized in sitting position. Symptoms and severity of AMS were assessed by the 2018 revised Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Score (LLS). This scoring system ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 12 (severe AMS symptoms) (20). AMS was defined as a maximal LLS score ≥ 4 (18, 20).

Blood (EDTA plasma) was sampled by a clinician before entering the hypoxic chamber (Measurement 1 [M1]) and 12 h later after exiting the chamber (M2).

Measurement of analytes

Samples were stored at −20°C until measurement. EPO and HIF-1α were measured at the Medical University of Innsbruck under blinded conditions using commercially available ELISA kits from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, United States), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For the EPO ELISA, samples were diluted to achieve a detectable range of 1.6–100.0 mU/mL. Each sample or diluted standard (50 μL) was incubated with 50 μL of biotin-conjugate for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. After washing, 100 μL of Streptavidin-HRP solution was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 15 min on a shaker. Following another washing step, 100 μL of TMB substrate solution was added. The reaction was stopped after approximately 10 min of incubation at room temperature in the dark when the highest standard has reached an OD of 0.90–0.95. The absorbance was then read on a microplate reader at 450 nm with reference wavelength at 620 nm.

For the HIF-1α ELISA, 50 μL of undiluted samples or standards were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with shaking. After washing, 50 μL of biotinylated detection antibody was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. After washing, 50 μL of streptavidin-HRP was added, which was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After a final washing step, 100 μL of TMB substrate was added. After 30 min, the reaction was stopped with 100 μL of stop solution, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm. In case of undetectable analyte levels, we used the lower detection limit (HIF-1α: 81.92 pg/mL; EPO: 1.60 mU/mL).

Plasma levels of Neurofilament light chain (pNfL) have already been determined previously (19). Briefly, pNfL was measured by single-molecule array (SIMOA) technique using the Simoa® NF-Light™ Advantage Kit (lot number: 503470) on the Simoa SR-X Analyzer (Quanterix, Lexington, MA, United States) (21). pNfL measurement was performed at the Medical University of Vienna under blinded conditions. The inter-assay coefficient of variation of pNfL was 12.4%.

To account for physiological variations of NfL levels, we calculated age- and BMI-adjusted NfL Z values according to Benkert et al. (22).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Data were displayed as median and 25th; 75th percentile. Group comparisons were done by Mann–Whitney-U test, repeated measurements by Wilcoxon test. Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) was used for correlation analysis. According to median EPO levels/ median EPO increase subjects were stratified into low and high EPO groups. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics

The ethics committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck approved this study (approval number 1130/2022). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Results

A total of 63 previously recruited (19) individuals at a median age of 24 [22;28] years were included into the study. Twenty-seven (43%) were females, the median BMI was 22 [21;24] kg/m2. Detailed information on demographic, clinical and laboratory data of our cohort are given in Table 1. Of note, NfL levels were available from a previous analysis (19); HIF-1α and EPO concentrations were determined for the present study.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of participants.

Clinical and biomarker changes associated with simulated high altitude exposure

Heart rate significantly increased 3 h after simulated high altitude exposure (M1: 80 [73;86] bpm, M2: 84 [78;91] bpm, p = 0.001), while SaO2 decreased (M1: 97 [96;98] %, M2: 83 [80;87] %, p < 0.001).

Overall, EPO showed a significant increase 12 h after simulated high altitude exposure (M1: 4.17 [2.99;5.67] mU/mL, M2: 10.12 [7.86;14.06] mU/mL, p < 0.001, Figure 1A). Concentrations of HIF-1α (M1: 81.92 [81.92;159.51] pg/mL, M2: 81.92 [81.92;194.83] pg/mL, p = 0.409) as well as of absolute pNfL concentrations (M1: 5.57 [4.39;8.01] pg/mL, M2: 6.20 [4.54;7.64] pg/mL, p = 0.755, Figure 1B) and NfL Z scores (M1: 0.41 [−0.28;1.37], M2: 0.71 [−0.39;1.28], p = 0.631) did not show a statistically significant change.

Figure 1
Box plots showing various measurements and comparisons: A) Erythropoietin levels at two timepoints with a p-value of less than 0.001, indicating a significant increase from timepoint 1 to 2. B) NfL levels at two timepoints with a p-value of 0.755, showing no significant change. C) NfL increase in low versus high erythropoietin groups with a p-value of 0.052, indicating a non-significant difference. D) NfL levels at measurement 2 for low and high erythropoietin groups with a p-value of 0.030, suggesting a significant difference.

Figure 1. EPO and NfL concentrations before and after simulated high altitude exposure. (A) EPO levels before and 12 h after simulated high altitude. (B) NfL levels before and 12 h after simulated high altitude. (C) NfL increase between M1 and M2 in subjects within the low and high EPO group. Stratification into low and high EPO group was done according to the median increase of EPO concentrations between M1 and M2 (5.85 mU/mL). (D) NfL levels at M2 in subjects within the low and high EPO group. Stratification into low and high EPO group was done according to the median EPO concentration at M2 (10.12 mU/mL). EPO, Erythropoietin; NfL, Neurofilament Light.

High EPO levels are associated with low NfL levels

However, the change of pNfL concentrations was different depending on the EPO levels. pNfL concentrations decreased between M1 and M2 in the high EPO group (−0.36 [−1.34;0.63] pg/mL), while there was an increase of pNfL in the low EPO group (0.26 [−0.41;1.68] pg/mL, p = 0.052, Figure 1C). NfL Z scores also decreased in the high EPO group (−0.20 [−0.83;0.26]) and increased in the low EPO group (0.21 [−0.07;0.53], p = 0.012). At M2 absolute pNfL concentrations and NfL Z scores were significantly lower in individuals with high EPO levels compared to those with low EPO (pNfL: 5.85 [4.15;6.85] pg/mL vs. 6.73 [4.70;8.64] pg/mL, p = 0.030, Figure 1D NfL Z score: 0.64 [−0.88;1.17] vs. 0.95 [0.25;1.48] p = 0.040).

Physiological variables correlate with EPO increase

There was a positive correlation between the extent of the heart rate increase and EPO levels at M2 (rs = 0.322, p = 0.011), while a negative correlation between SaO2 decrease and EPO levels (rs = −0.276, p = 0.031). There was no correlation between the LLS score and EPO levels (rs = −0.050, p = 0.702). EPO levels of individuals experiencing AMS at any point of the study did not differ from AMS-free individuals at M1 (4.72 [3.02;5.66] mU/mL vs. 3.83 [2.54;5.67] mU/mL, p = 0.289) and M2 (12.07 [7.86;15.85] mU/mL vs. 9.52 [7.84;12.78] mU/mL, p = 0.410).

Discussion

In the present study, we provide data on EPO and NfL metrics before and after simulated high altitude exposure. There were two main findings: (i) EPO increased already 12 h after simulated high altitude exposure correlating with heart rate increase and SaO2 decrease, (ii) subjects with higher EPO increase showed lower NfL levels.

Worldwide, high altitude regions are visited for various reasons with the risk of developing high-altitude illness, of which AMS is the most common (7). The predominating cornerstone of AMS pathophysiology is hypoxia, caused by a low oxygen partial pressure and leading to expected oxygen saturation in healthy subjects of around 75–85% in 4,500 m (23, 24). EPO is crucial in the early adaption to high altitude (11) and during the adaption to hypoxia, respectively (3, 8). Of note, also a neuroprotective role of EPO has been proposed (12, 13), even though not undisputed. For instance, it has been reported that EPO application ameliorates the clinical and histological outcome in cuprizone-induced demyelination in mice (25), that EPO improves the survival and even regeneration of insect neurons (26), or that in a rat model of multiple sclerosis EPO increased the survival of retinal ganglion cells (27). From a clinical perspective, a recent multicenter study, investigating EPO as add-on therapy to mechanical thrombolysis during acute ischemic stroke, seems to be of special interest. Herein the first investigation showed a negative result, even if, an explorative subgroup analysis suggested that patients not receiving thrombolysis had a benefit from EPO (15). In a previous study body fluid biomarkers for brain damage after ischemic stroke including S100B, glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) were significantly lower in the EPO treated patients than in placebo treated ones (14).

Here, we provide data of EPO and NfL levels measured in 63 healthy individuals before and after a 12 h-exposure to simulated high altitude in a normobaric hypoxic chamber. The first finding of our study, i.e., the significant increase of EPO already 12 h after simulated high altitude exposure is in line with existing literature. The temporal dynamics of biological markers in human organisms after high altitude exposure follow roughly the following schedule. First, within minutes to hours after the ascent, heart and ventilation rate as well as cerebral blood flow increase. Secondly, within hours to days EPO levels start to increase. It has been suggested that EPO levels are one of the first humoral reactions to high altitude, with a time lag of a few hours (23). This hypothesis is substantiated by our data of significant EPO increases already after 12 h in simulated high altitude. Thirdly, after days to weeks the increase of ventilation comes to a maximum, alongside with increases in red blood cell counts and hemoglobin (23).

Analyzing the link of EPO levels to NfL leads to the probably most important finding of our study. Individuals with a higher increase in EPO concentrations showed lower pNfL levels after 12 h in simulated high altitude. Vice versa, lower EPO increase was associated with higher pNfL. This finding has to be contextualized with the discussion on the potential neuroprotective role of EPO. NfL is an established surrogate for neuroaxonal damage (16). Therefore, one might hypothesize that subjects with higher EPO levels after 12 h of simulated high-altitude exposure experience less neuroaxonal damage. A possible explanation for a neuroprotective effect of EPO is that EPO shows anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects in neural tissue (28). In response to reduced oxygen availability, hypoxia-inducible factors—particularly HIF-1α—are activated as key transcriptional regulators. Among their various target genes, EPO is one of the most prominent (29). EPO binds to its receptor, expressed also on neurons, astrocytes and endothelial cells, and leads to activation of downstream signaling cascades such as the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2/STAT5) or the Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathways (30, 31). These pathways are involved in promoting neuronal survival, reducing oxidative stress, and stabilizing the blood–brain barrier (32). It has been demonstrated that EPO reduces glutamate toxicity, inhibits caspase-mediated apoptosis, and promotes the expression of neurotrophic factors (33, 34). Taken together, these effects could reduce neuroaxonal injury under hypoxic conditions. When neuroaxonal damage occurs in hypoxia, it is thought to be caused by mitochondrial dysfunction and increased production of reactive oxygen species. This can lead to structural damage of the neuronal cytoskeleton and consequently to degradation of neurofilaments, particularly of the light chain protein (i.e., NfL), by calcium-dependent proteases such as calpain. Subsequently, neurofilaments are released into the extracellular space and are reflected by elevated NfL levels in cerebrospinal fluid and blood (16).

It has to be pointed out, that a change in pNfL by high altitude exposure shows a peak significantly later than after 12 h, i.e., after weeks to months (19, 3537). One might hypothesize, that the inverse correlation between EPO and NfL might be even stronger after longer follow-up. However, due to insufficient sample volume (19), we were not able to determine EPO levels at later time points. This quite short study duration restricts our ability to evaluate a potential, long-term neuroprotective effects of EPO under sustained hypoxic conditions. It is a limitation of our study leaving an interesting field for future research.

Of note, our findings show that EPO levels correlate with the extent of heart rate increase after 3 h in simulated high altitude. Increasing heart rates are a well-known phenomenon occurring nearly immediately after sudden exposure to high altitude (23). Indeed, it is known that the degree of hypoxia and resulting hypoxemia is the key driver of EPO production in the kidneys; hypoxemia in turn is correlated with the degree of heart rate increase (38, 39). Herein our findings are in line with earlier studies suggesting that EPO increases are predictable early after simulated high altitude (i.e., after 3 h in our cohort) by assessing vital parameters like the heart rate increase or the SaO2 decrease. This may have implications in both, sports medicine, for strategical high altitude training and neurological risk assessment of high altitude exposure.

In regard of increasing EPO levels the lacking increase of HIF-1α between M1 and M2 has to be pointed out. Indeed, increasing HIF-1α levels are known to usually precede EPO increases (11). The lacking increase of HIF-1α in our cohort may be explained by the timing of M2 in our cohort (i.e., after 12 h). HIF-1 is thought to mediate the acute adaption to high altitude, i.e., to hypoxia, while HIF-2 is essential in chronic hypoxia. This transition from HIF-1 to HIF-2 is called the “HIF switch” and probably occurs within hours after initiation of hypoxia (40). More precisely, it has recently been reported that HIF-1 expression is maximal after 4 h of hypoxia and is reduced dramatically by hour 8 (29). Therefore, the timing of our second measurement may have been too late, to detect the initial HIF-1α increase, as the HIF switch has already been completed.

Some limitations of this study have to be acknowledged. A first limitation may arise from the fact that not actual high-altitude exposure was tested, but simulated high altitude exposure. The simulation was done by means of a hypoxic chamber, using normobaric hypoxia. In general, normobaric hypoxia has been proposed to be a valid model of high altitude exposure (41). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that reactions of body fluid biomarkers including EPO and NfL to actual high altitude exposure may differ from our findings. Further sources of influence may include extreme weather impact, physical exhaustion, lack of hydration or nutrition. On the other hand these confounding factors were ruled out systematically. Furthermore, we want to highlight, that our study was not designed to provide direct experimental evidence linking EPO to reductions in NfL levels, or even a causal relationship between both. To address this, future studies could involve interventional designs—both in preclinical models and clinical trials—measuring NfL levels before and after EPO treatment under controlled hypoxic or neuroinflammatory conditions. Finally, the absolute pNfL increases and differences between the two EPO groups were small. While the clinical relevance of our findings can be questioned, this was an exploratory study focusing on pathophysiological changes.

In summary, in this exploratory study we showed that EPO levels increase after simulated high altitude exposure, correlate with the increase of heart rate and the decrease of SaO2 after 3 h and that higher EPO levels are associated with lower NfL levels. Further studies including a larger number of participants and longer follow-up are needed to replicate our findings.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck (Approval number: 1130/2022). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

KB: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Visualization, Data curation, Project administration, Investigation, Validation, Software, Resources, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. ABe: Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Methodology, Conceptualization. ABa: Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. DR: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. FrD: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Validation, Supervision. GB: Resources, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. MP: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. BT: Data curation, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Resources. AK: Data curation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Investigation. TB: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision. MW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Methodology. MB: Validation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Resources. MR: Resources, Investigation, Data curation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision. FlD: Validation, Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. HH: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Formal analysis, Software, Data curation, Resources, Methodology.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by governmental means of the “Tiroler Wissenschaftsförderungfonds” (TWF).

Conflict of interest

KB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Roche, Teva, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi and Novartis. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Immunology/Neurology, Section Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology. ABa has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Almirall, and Biogen. FrD has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Celgene and Roche. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis. BT has received speaker honoraria from AOP Health Austria and travel funding from Pfizer. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Biologix, BMS/Celgene, Eisai, Janssen-Cilag, Jazz/GW, Horizon, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. MR was supported by research grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF projects P32699 and IPN170), the Austrian Research Promotion Agency and Roche. FlD has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi-Genzyme. HH has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens, Teva, and received honoraria for acting as consultant for Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Simonson, TS. Altitude adaptation: a glimpse through various lenses. High Alt Med Biol. (2015) 16:125–37. doi: 10.1089/ham.2015.0033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Beall, CM. Andean, Tibetan, and Ethiopian patterns of adaptation to high-altitude hypoxia. Integr Comp Biol. (2006) 46:18–24. doi: 10.1093/icb/icj004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Heinicke, K, Prommer, N, Cajigal, J, Viola, T, Behn, C, and Schmidt, W. Long-term exposure to intermittent hypoxia results in increased hemoglobin mass, reduced plasma volume, and elevated erythropoietin plasma levels in man. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2003) 88:535–43. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0732-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mairer, K, Wille, M, Bucher, T, and Burtscher, M. Prevalence of acute mountain sickness in the eastern Alps. High Alt Med Biol. (2009) 10:239–45. doi: 10.1089/ham.2008.1091

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Schneider, M, Bernasch, D, Weymann, J, Holle, R, and Bartsch, P. Acute mountain sickness: influence of susceptibility, preexposure, and ascent rate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2002) 34:1886–91. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Luks, AM, Swenson, ER, and Bärtsch, P. Acute high-altitude sickness. Eur Respir Rev. (2017) 26:160096. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0096-2016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hackett, PH, and Roach, RC. High-altitude illness. N Engl J Med. (2001) 345:107–14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107123450206

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Pugh, CW, and Ratcliffe, PJ. New horizons in hypoxia signaling pathways. Exp Cell Res. (2017) 356:116–21. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Nairz, M, Schroll, A, Moschen, AR, Sonnweber, T, Theurl, M, Theurl, I, et al. Erythropoietin contrastingly affects bacterial infection and experimental colitis by inhibiting nuclear factor-κB-inducible immune pathways. Immunity. (2011) 34:61–74. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.01.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Villa, P, Bigini, P, Mennini, T, Agnello, D, Laragione, T, Cagnotto, A, et al. Erythropoietin selectively attenuates cytokine production and inflammation in cerebral ischemia by targeting neuronal apoptosis. J Exp Med. (2003) 198:971–5. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Suresh, S, Rajvanshi, PK, and Noguchi, CT. The many facets of erythropoietin physiologic and metabolic response. Front Physiol. (2019) 10:1534. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01534

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Iwai, M, Cao, G, Yin, W, Stetler, RA, Liu, J, and Chen, J. Erythropoietin promotes neuronal replacement through revascularization and neurogenesis after neonatal hypoxia/ischemia in rats. Stroke. (2007) 38:2795–803. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.483008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Bernaudin, M, Marti, HH, Roussel, S, Divoux, D, Nouvelot, A, MacKenzie, ET, et al. A potential role for erythropoietin in focal permanent cerebral ischemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (1999) 19:643–51. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199906000-00007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ehrenreich, H, Kästner, A, Weissenborn, K, Streeter, J, Sperling, S, Wang, KK, et al. Circulating damage marker profiles support a neuroprotective effect of erythropoietin in ischemic stroke patients. Mol Med. (2011) 17:1306–10. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ehrenreich, H, Weissenborn, K, Prange, H, Schneider, D, Weimar, C, Wartenberg, K, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2009) 40:e647–56. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.564872

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Khalil, M, Teunissen, CE, Otto, M, Piehl, F, Sormani, MP, Gattringer, T, et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. (2018) 14:577–89. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hoiland, RL, Ainslie, PN, Wellington, CL, Cooper, J, Stukas, S, Thiara, S, et al. Brain hypoxia is associated with neuroglial injury in humans post-cardiac arrest. Circ Res. (2021) 129:583–97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Treml, B, Kleinsasser, A, Hell, T, Knotzer, H, Wille, M, and Burtscher, M. Carry-over quality of pre-acclimatization to altitude elicited by intermittent hypoxia: a participant-blinded, randomized controlled trial on antedated acclimatization to altitude. Front Physiol. (2020) 11:531. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00531

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Berek, K, Lindner, A, Pauli, FD, Bsteh, G, Treml, B, Ponleitner, M, et al. Neurofilament light chain is associated with Acute Mountain sickness. Brain Behav. (2024) 14:e70165. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70165

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Roach, RC, Hackett, PH, Oelz, O, Bärtsch, P, Luks, AM, MacInnis, MJ, et al. The 2018 Lake Louise acute mountain sickness score. High Alt Med Biol. (2018) 19:4–6. doi: 10.1089/ham.2017.0164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rissin, DM, Kan, CW, Campbell, TG, Howes, SC, Fournier, DR, Song, L, et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat Biotechnol. (2010) 28:595–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Benkert, P, Meier, S, Schaedelin, S, Manouchehrinia, A, Yaldizli, Ö, Maceski, A, et al. Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective modelling and validation study. Lancet Neurol. (2022) 21:246–57. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00009-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Luks, AM, and Hackett, PH. Medical conditions and high-altitude travel. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386:364–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2104829

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Eltzschig, HK, and Carmeliet, P. Hypoxia and inflammation. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:656–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0910283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hagemeyer, N, Boretius, S, Ott, C, Von Streitberg, A, Welpinghus, H, Sperling, S, et al. Erythropoietin attenuates neurological and histological consequences of toxic demyelination in mice. Mol Med. (2012) 18:628–35. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00457

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Ostrowski, D, Ehrenreich, H, and Heinrich, R. Erythropoietin promotes survival and regeneration of insect neurons in vivo and in vitro. Neuroscience. (2011) 188:95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.05.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sättler, MB, Merkler, D, Maier, K, Stadelmann, C, Ehrenreich, H, Bähr, M, et al. Neuroprotective effects and intracellular signaling pathways of erythropoietin in a rat model of multiple sclerosis. Cell Death Differ. (2004) 11:S181–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401504

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Byts, N, and Sirén, AL. Erythropoietin: a multimodal neuroprotective agent. Exp Transl Stroke Med. (2009) 1:4. doi: 10.1186/2040-7378-1-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jaśkiewicz, M, Moszyńska, A, Króliczewski, J, Cabaj, A, Bartoszewska, S, Charzyńska, A, et al. The transition from HIF-1 to HIF-2 during prolonged hypoxia results from reactivation of PHDs and HIF1A mRNA instability. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2022) 27:109. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00408-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Brines, ML, Ghezzi, P, Keenan, S, Agnello, D, de Lanerolle, NC, Cerami, C, et al. Erythropoietin crosses the blood-brain barrier to protect against experimental brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:10526–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Digicaylioglu, M, and Lipton, SA. Erythropoietin-mediated neuroprotection involves cross-talk between Jak2 and NF-kappaB signalling cascades. Nature. (2001) 412:641–7. doi: 10.1038/35088074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Mallet, RT, and Ryou, MG. Erythropoietin: endogenous protection of ischemic brain. Vitam Horm. (2017) 105:197–232. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2017.01.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Morishita, E, Masuda, S, Nagao, M, Yasuda, Y, and Sasaki, R. Erythropoietin receptor is expressed in rat hippocampal and cerebral cortical neurons, and erythropoietin prevents in vitro glutamate-induced neuronal death. Neuroscience. (1997) 76:105–16. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00306-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wang, L, Zhang, Z, Wang, Y, Zhang, R, and Chopp, M. Treatment of stroke with erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis and improves neurological function in rats. Stroke. (2004) 35:1732–7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000132196.49028.a4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pedersen, A, Stanne, TM, Nilsson, S, Klasson, S, Rosengren, L, Holmegaard, L, et al. Circulating neurofilament light in ischemic stroke: temporal profile and outcome prediction. J Neurol. (2019) 266:2796–806. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09477-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Tiedt, S, Duering, M, Barro, C, Kaya, AG, Boeck, J, Bode, FJ, et al. Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuroaxonal injury after ischemic stroke. Neurology. (2018) 91:e1338–47. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006282

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Gattringer, T, Pinter, D, Enzinger, C, Seifert-Held, T, Kneihsl, M, Fandler, S, et al. Serum neurofilament light is sensitive to active cerebral small vessel disease. Neurology. (2017) 89:2108–14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004645

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Jelkmann, W. Regulation of erythropoietin production. J Physiol. (2011) 589:1251–8. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Saito, S, Tanobe, K, Yamada, M, and Nishihara, F. Relationship between arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate variability at high altitudes. Am J Emerg Med. (2005) 23:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.09.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Serocki, M, Bartoszewska, S, Janaszak-Jasiecka, A, Ochocka, RJ, Collawn, JF, and Bartoszewski, R. miRNAs regulate the HIF switch during hypoxia: a novel therapeutic target. Angiogenesis. (2018) 21:183–202. doi: 10.1007/s10456-018-9600-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Burtscher, M, Flatz, M, and Faulhaber, M. Prediction of susceptibility to acute mountain sickness by SaO2 values during short-term exposure to hypoxia. High Alt Med Biol. (2004) 5:335–40. doi: 10.1089/ham.2004.5.335

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: erythropoietin, high altitude, acute mountain sickness, neurofilament light, axonal damage

Citation: Berek K, Berek A, Bauer A, Rudzki D, Di Pauli F, Bsteh G, Ponleitner M, Treml B, Kleinsasser A, Berger T, Wille M, Burtscher M, Reindl M, Deisenhammer F and Hegen H (2025) High erythropoietin levels are associated with low neurofilament light levels in simulated high altitude: a further hint for neuroprotection by erythropoietin. Front. Neurol. 16:1608763. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1608763

Received: 09 April 2025; Accepted: 14 July 2025;
Published: 28 July 2025.

Edited by:

Isabella Zanella, University of Brescia, Italy

Reviewed by:

Giulia Musso, University of Padua, Italy
Junian Cahyanto Wibawa, STKIP PGRI Trenggalek, Indonesia
Umer Javed Butt, Heidelberg University, Germany

Copyright © 2025 Berek, Berek, Bauer, Rudzki, Di Pauli, Bsteh, Ponleitner, Treml, Kleinsasser, Berger, Wille, Burtscher, Reindl, Deisenhammer and Hegen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Harald Hegen, aGFyYWxkLmhlZ2VuQGktbWVkLmFjLmF0

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.