EDITORIAL article

Front. Neurol., 23 May 2025

Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1610463

This article is part of the Research TopicClinical Therapy of Brain TumorsView all 18 articles

Editorial: Clinical therapy of brain tumors

  • 1Second Department of Neurosurgery, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital/State GridBeijing Electric Power Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 3University Hospital of Policlinico G. Martino, Messina, Italy
  • 4Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

Editorial on the Research Topic
Clinical Therapy of Brain Tumors

Brain tumors are devastating diseases, accounting for a significant proportion of cancer-related mortality and morbidity in both adults and children. Over the past few years, treatment for brain tumors have witnessed dramatic progress. This is largely due to advances in surgical skills, more rational and personalized radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and continually updated immunotherapies that modulate the immune microenvironment or specifically target tumor cells. This editorial summarizes significant findings on surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other treatment published in the Research Topic, Clinical Therapy of Brain Tumors, Frontiers in Neurology, emphasizing their impact on advancing the understanding and treatment of brain tumors. The current Research Topic includes 17 papers, among which 7 were considered as Original Research, with 3 Reviews and 7 case reports.

1 Surgical treatment for brain tumors

Prior to surgery, various imaging techniques can provide information about the nature of the tumor, including its location, blood supply, metabolic status, and key surrounding functional areas. Furthermore, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) have emerged as new tools for the localization of important areas of function. It was found that the application of nTMS could improve surgical total resection rates for low-grade gliomas (LGGs) by approximately 16% and increase median progression-free survival (PFS) from 15.4 months to 22.4 months (1, 2). Moreover, application of intraoperative assistive technology such as intraoperative navigation, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative fluorescence, which can assist the operator in effectively localizing lesion and extent of the tumor, can also increase the success of the operation. In addition, intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring techniques and intraoperative awakening technique can help the surgeon localize the important functional areas of the brain, which play a significant role in protecting the function of the important functional areas of the patient. Duan et al. highlighted that with proper management of the sagittal sinus and protection of the associated veins, the surgical treatment strategy for the “radical” resection of parasagittal sinus meningioma is effective, safe and simple to perform. He et al. reviewed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 14 patients with polymorphic low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young and highlighted that stereoelectroencephalography was pivotal for cases with unclear lateralization, aiding in identifying the link between the tumor and seizures. They suggested that following established epilepsy surgery protocols for brain tumor management, early intervention and extended resection can improve the rate of postoperative seizure freedom. Gui et al. reported a rare case of neurocytoma originating from cranial nerve V.

2 Radiotherapy for brain tumors

Radiotherapy is primarily used to treat malignant neoplasms, including gliomas and brain metastases, benign neoplasms that are not amenable to complete resection, such as meningiomas, as well as neoplasms that appear sensitive to radiotherapy, such as germ cell tumors. In recent years, with the development in science and technology, a multitude of novel techniques have been employed in radiotherapy, such as proton radiotherapy and heavy ion radiotherapy (HIRT), which has led to significant improvement in patient prognoses. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, with more precise dose distribution, is able to further protect the surrounding normal tissues without loss of clinical efficacy (3). Although the current evidence for proton radiotherapy in brain tumors is limited, it still shows good prospects for application (4). In the current Research Topic, Palenzuela et al. studied acute toxicity of chemotherapy in central nervous system germ cell tumor patients according to age. Li et al. found that adjuvant beam radiation therapy could enhance overall survival (OS) in younger primary single intracranial atypical meningioma patients.

3 Systemic therapy for brain tumors

Systemic anti-tumor agents broadly include traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapeutic agents, mainly for high grade gliomas, brain metastases, lymphomas, etc. The molecularly targeted agents includes IDH1/2 mutant inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, NTRK fusion inhibitors, MET kinase inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs, etc. Vorasidenib, an oral IDH1/2 mutant inhibitor, was shown in a phase III study to significantly increase progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with grade 2 IDH-mutated oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma (5). In the Research Topic, Bao et al. made a retrospective study of chemotherapy strategies for adults with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM). In addition, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines (NCCN) recommended that patients with NTRK-compatible gliomas should be treated with NTRK fusion inhibitors, such as larotrectinib and entrectinib (6, 7). Although it can increase PFS of patients, bevacizumab, the first antiangiogenic drug approved by the FDA and recommended by NCCN to treat recurrent GBM, still failed in prolonging OS (8). Currently, the most promising immunotherapeutic agents against brain tumors are only immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab). Although failed in phase III clinical trial against recurrent GBM (9), anti-PD-1 immunotherapy still showed efficiency in increasing GBM patient OS as neoadjuvant systemic therapy (10).

Other forms of immunotherapy, including tumor vaccine therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy and oncolytic virus therapy, have also shown promise in the treatment of brain tumors. A dendritic cell vaccine called DCVax-L showed obvious efficacy in clinical trials against primary GBM, with a median OS of 23.1 months (11). G47Δ, based on human herpes simplex virus, had markedly improved 1-year survival rate to 84.2%, and median OS to 20.2 months for residual or recurrent GBM patients (12). In 2021, G47Δwas approved for marketing in Japan for the treatment of residual or recurrent GBM. According to these above results, the Society for Immunotherapy Of Cancer (SITC) published a consensus statement that immunotherapy can be used as a salvage treatment option for gliomas patients after conventional treatment, which required further optimization of combination therapy (13). In the current Research Topics, Chen et al. performed a literature review about the immune microenvironment and immunotherapy for chordoma. In addition, Pu et al. unveiled substantial involvement of MAP2K3 in gliomas, indicating the potential of the enzyme to serve as a prognostic biomarker related to immunity. Through the regulation of the infiltration of immune cells, MAP2K3 can affect the prognosis of patients with glioma. Shen et al. performed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to identify independent prognostic variables for GBM patients with synchronous metastasis (SM). They found that radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery constitute an effective treatment regimen for patients with SM. Luo et al. performed a literature review in which they summarized the latest advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms that regulate regulated cell death in glioma and explore the interconnections between different cell death processes. Palenzuela et al. compared the tolerance of chemotherapy across age-groups within the SIOP-CNS-GCT-II trial.

4 Tumor treating fields for brain tumors

Tumor treating fields (TTF) is a new type of therapy applying physics that works by delivering low-intensity, medium-frequency alternating electric fields through a patch applied to the scalp. The fundamental mechanism by which TTF exerts its therapeutic effect involves anti-tumor cell mitosis, suppression of DNA damage repair, disruption of tumor cell migration, and potentiation of anti-tumor immune responses (14). The versatility of this therapeutic modality renders it a promising candidate for concurrent utilization with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and immunotherapy (15). The results from a prospective, single-arm, phase I clinical trial demonstrated that the combination of TTFields and chemotherapy may offer survival benefits for recurrent GBM patients (16). Moreover, TTF in combination with TMZ and pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy could improved the median OS of primary GBM patients to 24.8 months, with a two-year OS rate of 52.4% (17), which supported the safety and efficiency of TTF in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and thus requires further exploration. Currently, TTF has been recommended by the NCCN for combined administration with TMZ for primary GBM patients after surgery or radiotherapy, or alone for recurrent GBM patients (15).

5 Conclusion

Recent advancements in surgical assistive technologies have led to significant progress in the field of neurosurgery. These technologies play a crucial role in protecting vital neurological functions, enabling neurosurgeons to more accurately determine the margin between tumor and normal brain tissue. Additionally, these technologies have also contributed to increasing the extent of brain tumor resection and, consequently, enhancing the prognosis for brain tumor patients. Radiotherapy constitutes a critical localized treatment modality for gliomas, playing a pivotal role in the management of inoperable cases and/or for local disease control. Continuous advancements in novel radiotherapy techniques have led to enhanced control of brain tumors while concurrently reducing adverse effects. Drug therapy, immunotherapy and TTF, emerged as critical tools in the control of brain tumors, have also demonstrated efficacy in the management of brain tumors. Consequently, the future holds more promising significant advancements in the treatment of brain tumors, which will further improve patient outcomes.

Author contributions

BH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HZhao: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. JY: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Project administration. FL: Investigation, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. GC: Writing – review & editing, Software, Validation, Visualization. HZhan: Software, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. LC: Software, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This program was funded by the Science and Technology Project of the Genertec Guozhong Healthcare Group administered by BH.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Frey D, Schilt S, Strack V, Zdunczyk A, Rösler J, Niraula B, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the treatment outcome in patients with brain tumors in motor eloquent locations. Neuro Oncol. (2014) 16:1365–72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Picht T, Frey D, Thieme S, Kliesch S, Vajkoczy P. Presurgical navigated TMS motor cortex mapping improves outcome in glioblastoma surgery: a controlled observational study. J Neurooncol. (2016) 126:535–43. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1993-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Goff KM, Zheng C, Alonso-Basanta M. Proton radiotherapy for glioma and glioblastoma. Chin Clin Oncol. (2022) 11:46. doi: 10.21037/cco-22-92

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Qiu X, Gao J, Hu J, Yang J, Hu W, Huang Q, et al. Proton radiotherapy in the treatment of IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas: an early experience from shanghai proton and heavy ion center. J Neurooncol. (2023) 162:503–14. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04202-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, Touat M, Peters KB, Clarke J, et al. Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med. (2023) 389:589–601. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304194

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Marcus L, Donoghue M, Aungst S, Myers CE, Helms WS, Shen G, et al. FDA approval summary: entrectinib for the treatment of NTRK gene fusion solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. (2021) 27:928–32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2771

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hong DS, DuBois SG, Kummar S, Farago AF, Albert CM, Rohrberg KS, et al. Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:531–40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30856-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, Taphoorn M, Sahm F, Harting I, et al. Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:1954–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Reardon DA, Brandes AA, Omuro A, Mulholland P, Lim M, Wick A, et al. Effect of nivolumab vs bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: the CheckMate 143 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. (2020) 6:1003–10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Cloughesy TF, Mochizuki AY, Orpilla JR, Hugo W, Lee AH, Davidson TB, et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat Med. (2019) 25:477–86. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Liau LM, Ashkan K, Brem S, Campian JL, Trusheim JE, Iwamoto FM, et al. Association of autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination with extension of survival among patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 3 prospective externally controlled cohort trial. JAMA Oncol. (2023) 9:112–21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5370

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Todo T, Ito H, Ino Y, Ohtsu H, Ota Y, Shibahara J, et al. Intratumoral oncolytic herpes virus G47Δ for residual or recurrent glioblastoma: a phase 2 trial. Nat Med. (2022) 28:1630–9. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01897-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Sampson JH, Gunn MD, Fecci PE, Ashley DM. Brain immunology and immunotherapy in brain tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. (2020) 20:12–25. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0224-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Nabors B, Portnow J, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Horbinski C. NCCN CNS tumor guidelines update for (2023). Neuro Oncol. (2023) 25:2114–6. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad169

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vergote I, Macarulla T, Hirsch FR, Hagemann C, Miller DS. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy Concomitant with Taxanes for Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:636. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Guo C, Yang Q, He Z, Duan H, Liu R, Mu Y. Tumor-treating fields combined with second-line chemotherapy reached pro-gression free survival of 833 months in Chinese recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. (2023) 25:ii117. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad137.395

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Tran DD, Ghiaseddin AP, Chen D, Le SB. Final analysis of 2-THE-TOP: a phase 2 study of TTFields (Op-tune) plus pembrolizumab plus maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. (2023) 41:2024. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.2024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: brain tumor treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, neurosurgery

Citation: Huang B, Zhao H, Yang J, Liu F, Caruso G, Zhang H and Chen L (2025) Editorial: Clinical therapy of brain tumors. Front. Neurol. 16:1610463. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1610463

Received: 12 April 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025;
Published: 23 May 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: David D. Eisenstat, Royal Children's Hospital, Australia

Copyright © 2025 Huang, Zhao, Yang, Liu, Caruso, Zhang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Boyuan Huang, NTI1MTExMjA5QHFxLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.