ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neuro-Otology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1618031
App-based daily self-measurement of impedance in cochlear implant users
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- 2MED-EL Research Center, Hannover, Germany
- 3MED-EL (Austria), Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Impedance telemetry measurements in cochlear implant (CI) recipients are commonly used to assess CI electrode functionality and provide valuable insights into inner ear conditions. However, these measurements usually take place only during surgery and at clinical follow-up appointments, offering limited temporal resolution of impedance changes.This study aimed to address this gap by implementing daily impedance monitoring using a smartphone app.Methods: A prospective study evaluated the usability of a research app for remote impedance measurements over four months following standard CI surgery with a MED-EL FLEX28 electrode. Impedance was recorded twice daily (morning and evening). The mean impedance across all electrode channels was analyzed for four postoperative time periods: early postoperative (up to day 10 postoperatively), late postoperative (from day 11 to approximately four weeks), intensive fitting (from approximately four weeks postoperatively to approximately seven weeks) and regular hearing phase (from approximately seven weeks to four months). Two CI fitting approaches were compared: activation during the early postoperative phase (early activation, EA) and activation during the intensive fitting phase (conventional activation, CA). Morning-to-evening differences in impedance (MED) were also examined.Results:The app demonstrated an overall usage rate of 66% (n = 28), indicating moderate-tohigh adherence. Except for higher evening impedance values with CA in the late postoperative phase, no significant differences in mean impedance between the fitting approaches were observed (EA: 6.46 kΩ, n = 11; CA: 7.82 kΩ, n = 11; p = 0.04). Significant differences in MED were found during the early postoperative phase (EA: 0.06 kΩ, n = 8; CA: -0.18 kΩ, n = 10; p = 0.04) and the late postoperative phases (EA: 0.85 kΩ, n = 11; CA: 0.03 kΩ, n = 11; p < 0.001).Conclusion: Remote impedance measurements via the app can be made over an extended postoperative period. The increased measurement frequency allowed for detailed characterization of impedance dynamics, particularly around the onset of electrical stimulation. No clinically relevant difference in mean impedance was found between EA and CA groups. Daily fluctuations showed consistently lower evening values after stimulation onset. These findings highlight the potential value of this approach for enhancing postoperative CI management.
Keywords: cochlear implant, daily impedance telemetry, electrode impedance, Electrical Stimulation, remote impedance monitoring, impedance fluctuation, app usability
Received: 25 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vormelcher, Batsoulis, Kley, Mair and Buechner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sarah Vormelcher, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.