CLINICAL TRIAL article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Headache and Neurogenic Pain
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630732
This article is part of the Research TopicManagement of migraine in patients with coexistent conditions or comorbidities: from classic to novel therapiesView all 5 articles
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of episodic migraine: results of a pilot randomized, placebo-controlled trial of combination blood pressure lowering medication with propranolol
Provisionally accepted- 1George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, Australia
- 2Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Sydney, Australia
- 3Department of Neurology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- 4Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
- 5Institute of Neurological Sciences, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Beta blockers are effective in migraine prevention. Low-dose combination therapy of blood pressure lowering is likely to lower blood pressure more than a beta-blocker, but there are no data on comparative efficacy of these treatments in migraine prophylaxis.A double-blind, randomized, pilot trial in participants with episodic migraine to assess feasibility, efficacy and tolerability of low-dose triple combination BP lowering (telmisartan 20 mg, amlodipine 2.5 mg and indapamide 1.25 mg) vs propranolol 160 mg daily vs matching placebos. The primary outcome was monthly headache days.Results: Between March 2017 and June 2018, 378 participants were screened and 30 were randomized (8%). The key reasons for ineligibility among screen failures were low blood pressure (86, 26%), unwilling to participate in a drug trial (76, 23%) and not meeting episodic migraine criteria (54, 16%). Among those randomised, mean age was 49 years, 83% female, baseline migraine frequency was 67 hours, aura present in 47%, mean baseline BP was 131/87 mmHg. As expected from a small pilot, the confidence intervals for treatment effect estimates were wide: reduction in monthly headache days for the low-dose triple were -0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.9, 1.8) and for propranolol -1.1 (95% CI -3.8, 1.6) compared to placebo. Tolerability was good, there were no dropouts from adverse events.As a pilot study, the trial was not powered to detect efficacy; larger trials are required to determine the effect of low-dose triple combination blood pressure lowering on migraine. The medication was safe and well tolerated by participants with migraine; it is likely that study co-design with people with lived experience of migraine will benefit recruitment into the trial.
Keywords: Migraine, Antihypertensive treatment, randomized trials Clinical trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12616000937415, feasibility
Received: 18 May 2025; Accepted: 15 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Carcel, Haghdoost, Davies, Cordato, Griffiths, Balicki, Li, Freed, Anderson, ZAGAMI, Delcourt and Rodgers. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Cheryl Carcel, George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Newtown, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.