Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 20 August 2025

Sec. Neurocritical and Neurohospitalist Care

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1630773

Predicting 28-day mortality for patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke following endovascular treatment in neurology intensive care units

Wenjing Qin&#x;Wenjing Qin1Chengcheng Xiao&#x;Chengcheng Xiao2Jing YangJing Yang1Mei HuMei Hu1Liying Chang
Liying Chang1*Yanhan Zhu
Yanhan Zhu1*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China

Background: The clinical utility of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and modified Rankin Scale scores in predicting prognosis is well established. However, whether the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System II (APACHE II) score can predict mortality in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) admitted to the neurology intensive care unit (NICU) following endovascular treatment (EVT) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the ability of the APACHE II score to predict mortality in post-EVT LVOS patients admitted to the NICU.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled 93 consecutive patients (65 males; mean age, 68.0 years) with acute anterior circulation LVOS who underwent EVT. Patients were categorized into survival and death groups based on their 28-day post-EVT survival status. APACHE II scores of the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and optimal threshold of APACHE II scores in predicting mortality. Model calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for mortality prediction.

Results: Of the 93 enrolled patients, 74 (79.6%) survived and 19 (20.4%) died within 28 days. The death group had significantly higher APACHE II scores than the survival group [(21.84 ± 4.10) points vs. (13.05 ± 5.54) points, p < 0.001]. ROC analysis revealed excellent discriminative capacity (AUC 0.912, 95% CI 0.850–0.973), with an optimal threshold of 16.5 points (sensitivity 94.7%, specificity 75.7%). The mortality rate was 1.8% for patients with APACHE II scores <16.5 points and 50.0% for those with APACHE II scores ≥16.5 points. The model demonstrated good calibration (p = 0.878). Further, multivariable analysis confirmed both APACHE II scores (OR = 1.239, 95% CI 1.029–1.491, p = 0. 023) and cerebral hernia (OR = 11.404, 95% CI 1.507–86.314, p = 0. 018) as independent predictors.

Conclusion: APACHE II score assessed within 24 h post-EVT provides robust prediction of 28-day mortality in acute anterior circulation LVOS patients admitted to the NICU.

1 Introduction

Large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) is associated with high mortality and disability, with reported poor functional outcomes in 60–80% of patients at 3 months post-onset. Since the landmark 2015 trials demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) for LVOS, multiple prognostic factors, including age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Alberta Stroke Project Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), reperfusion grade, collateral status, core infarct size prior to EVT, infarct location, 24-h NIHSS score, final infarct volume, and hemorrhagic transformation (PH1 or PH2 type), have been identified (14). For LVOS patients admitted to the neurology intensive care unit (NICU) post-EVT, an objective and accurate assessment of prognosis and prediction of mortality is essential to facilitate doctor–patient communication and make informed medical decisions. In clinical practice, neurological scores [NIHSS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores] are generally used to evaluate the severity and prognosis (57). However, they fail to account for systemic physiological derangements. Previous studies have reported that patient frailty, comorbidities, and post-stroke complications adversely affect prognosis (3, 8, 9). Thus, finding a comprehensive mortality prediction tool for post-EVT LVOS patients in the NICU, is important.

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System II (APACHE II) score is widely used to predict mortality in critically ill patients within 24 h of ICU admission (10, 11). This scoring system has demonstrated reliability in mortality prediction across multiple conditions including acute pancreatitis, sepsis, and trauma (1214). Previous studies have also validated its application in stroke (1517). For patients with acute ischemic stroke, or ischemic stroke patients admitted to ICU, APACHE II score has been shown to be a reliable predictor (1820). However, the utility of APACHE II scoring system in LVOS patients following EVT remains unevaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the APACHE II score for 28-day mortality in anterior circulation LVOS patients admitted to the NICU post-EVT. These findings provide an objective clinical tool to guide NICU discharge decisions, identify high-risk patients, inform medical decision-making, and establish evidence-based criteria for post-EVT care pathways and cost-effectiveness in LOVS management.

2 Methods

2.1 Study design

We conducted a retrospective study of 93 patients with anterior circulation LVOS from 146 post-EVT patients who were admitted to the NICU, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science between November 2022 and December 2023 (Figure 1). This study was approved by our hospital’s Ethics Committee (2023–074).

Figure 1
Flowchart depicting patient selection for a study at Xiangyang Central Hospital. Initially, 146 LVOS patients undergoing EVT were considered. After excluding 31 with posterior circulation LVOS, 115 patients remained. Further exclusions included one with only anterior cerebral artery occlusion, six with DSA without EVT, eight for EVT with progressive mild stroke, four with recent operations, and three receiving decompressive craniectomy. Finally, 93 patients were included.

Figure 1. Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion. DSA, digital subtraction angiography; EVT, endovascular treatment; LVOS, large vessel occlusion stroke; NICU, neurology intensive care unit.

2.2 Study objects

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) age > 18 years; (ii) symptom onset within 24 h; (iii) meeting the indications and contraindications of EVT for acute ischemic stroke (21); (iv) computed tomography angiography (CTA) images showing anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (occlusion in the internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery), which led to stroke; (v) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) showing anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (occlusion in the internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery) pre-EVT; (vi) head computed tomography (CT) scans were performed post-EVT.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) mRS score > 1 point pre-EVT; (ii) posterior circulation large vessel occlusion or isolated anterior cerebral artery occlusion on CTA/DSA; (iii) DSA performed without subsequent EVT; (iv) EVT performed for progressive mild stroke with large vessel occlusion; (v) decompressive craniectomy during the course of the disease; (vi) major surgery performed in the past 2 weeks such as coronary stent operations and surgical operations; (vii) incomplete clinical, laboratory, or imaging data.

Based on the survival status at 28 days post-EVT, the patients were divided into survival and death groups.

2.3 Data collection

Clinical data collection involved gathering information on demographics (age and sex), vascular risk factors (hypertension, atrial fibrillation, stroke history, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high serum cholesterol, ischemic heart disease, smoking, and alcohol consumption), baseline blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic), body mass index, and laboratory tests (including serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, D-dimer, homocysteine, glycosylated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and albumin). Additionally, data on the offending vessels (the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery) and its side (left or right), baseline NIHSS and 24-h NIHSS scores, baseline GCS and 24-h GCS scores, presence of cerebral hernia, hemorrhagic transformation, APACHE II score, and predicted mortality rate (R-value) were collected.

According to the ECASS III classification, hemorrhagic transformation was assessed using post-EVT head CT imaging and categorized into four types: HI1 was defined as small petechial hemorrhages along the margins of the infarct; HI2 referred to confluent petechial hemorrhages within the infarct zone without space-occupying effect; PH1 was characterized by hematomas involving <30% of the infarct area with mild mass effect; while PH2 represented hematomas occupying >30% of the infarct area with significant mass effect or hemorrhages occurring outside the infarct zone (22).

The APACHE II scoring system comprises three components: age, acute physiology score (APS), and chronic health score (CHS), with a maximum total score of 71 points. The APS incorporates 12 physiological parameters: body temperature, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), heart rate, respiratory rate, pH value, arterial partial oxygen pressure, serum sodium, potassium, creatinine, hematocrit, white blood cell count, and GCS score. In this study, GCS scores were assessed based on neurological function 24 h post-NICU admission. The best guess principle was applied for sedated patients. For patients with artificial airways, the verbal response score was documented as 5–3–1. When asymmetric limb strength was present, the score was based on the less-affected side. All other APS parameters were evaluated using the most abnormal values recorded within the first 24 h. The CHS assessed pre-existing dysfunction in five organ systems: hepatic, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, and immunologic. The predicted mortality rate (R-value) was calculated from the APACHE II score.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Shapiro–Wilk test assessed the normal distribution of quantitative data. Normally distributed data were presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using independent-samples t-test. Non-normally distributed data were presented as median (lower quartile and upper quartile) and compared using Mann–Whitney U-test. Count data were presented as percentages and analyzed with Pearson’s Chi-square test. The sensitivity, specificity, and optimal threshold of APACHE II score were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test evaluated the calibration of APACHE II mortality predictions. Binary, multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with 28-day mortality. All statistical tests were two-sided, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The analysis was performed using the SPSS software package (version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States).

3 Results

Ninety-three anterior circulation LVOS patients admitted to the NICU post-EVT were included. They were 65 males (69.9%) and 28 females (30.1%), with a mean age of 67.96 ± 11.52 years (range: 35–93 years). Seventy-four patients (79.6%) survived at 28-day (survival group), including 27 (36.5%) with internal carotid artery occlusion and 47 (63.5%) with isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion. The remaining 19 patients (20.4%) died (death group), including 6 (31.6%) with internal carotid artery occlusion and 13 (68.4%) with isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic and baseline data of the survival group and the death group.

The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of sex distribution, specific vascular risk factors (hypertension, stroke history, type 2 diabetes mellitus, high serum cholesterol, ischemic heart disease, smoking, and alcohol consumption), baseline blood pressure, body mass index, certain laboratory tests (total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, D-dimer, homocysteine, glycosylated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, NLR, creatinine, and albumin), the offending vessel (the internal carotid artery or isolated middle cerebral artery) and its side (left or right), as well as baseline NIHSS score (all p > 0.05).

Patients in the death group were older than those in the survival group (p = 0.038) and had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.020). The death group also demonstrated elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (p = 0.021) and more severe neurological impairment, as evidenced by higher 24-h NIHSS scores (p < 0.001) and lower GCS scores both at baseline (p = 0.018) and 24-h (p < 0.001). Notably, cerebral hernia as a life-threatening complication occurred more frequently in death group (p < 0.001). And hemorrhagic transformation was more common in the death group (p = 0.002), with PH2 type hemorrhagic transformation being particularly prevalent (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

APACHE II scores were significantly higher in the death group (21.84 ± 4.10 points) compared to the survival group (13.05 ± 5.54 points; p < 0.001). Similarly, the R-values were higher in the death group [29.90% (21.59, 39.80%)] than the survival group [10.28% (6.89, 15.57%); p < 0.001] (Table 1).

The AUC value was 0.912 (95% CI 0.850–0.973), suggesting the excellent discriminative ability of APACHE II scoring system for mortality prediction in anterior circulation LVOS patients post-EVT (Figure 2). ROC analysis identified an optimal threshold of 16.5 points (Youden’s index), achieving 94.7% sensitivity and 75.7% specificity. Patients with scores <16.5 points were classified into the low-risk group, with a fatality rate of 1.8%. Conversely, patients with scores ≥16.5 points were placed in the high-risk group, with a fatality rate of 50.0%.

Figure 2
ROC curve illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. The blue curve rises above the red diagonal line, indicating good model performance. Axes: sensitivity versus one minus specificity.

Figure 2. ROC curve of predictive mortality for APACHE II score. APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation system II; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve.

The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and observed mortality (p = 0.878), indicating strong calibration of APACHE II scores (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Contingency table of Lemeshow-Hosmer goodness-of-fit test for APACHE II scores.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of 28-day mortality, with survival status as the dependent variable and variables with p < 0.05 in Table 1 as independent variables. We constructed three models. Model 1 included all significant risk factors, showing 24-h NIHSS as an independent risk factor (OR = 1.726, 95% CI 1.154–2.581, p = 0. 008). In Model 2, we excluded two collinear variables, 24-h NIHSS (variance inflation factor (VIF) = 8.847) and 24-h GCS (VIF = 8.409). It revealed that APAHCE II scores (OR = 1.239, 95% CI 1.029–1.491, p = 0. 023) and cerebral hernia (OR = 11.404, 95% CI 1.507–86.314, p = 0. 018) were significant risk factors. In Model 3, we converted the APAHCE II scores from a continuous variable in model 2 into a categorical variable with the threshold value of 16.5 points. APAHCE II scores (OR = 20.460, 95% CI 2.000–209.263, p = 0. 011) and cerebral hernia (OR = 12.406, 95% CI 1.847–83.338, p = 0. 010) were independent risk factors in LVOS patients after EVT (Table 3).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The 28-day mortality odds ratios for LVOS following EVT.

4 Discussion

In 1985, Knaus et al. first proposed the APACHE II scoring system (10). The system is simple to operate and can assess the mortality of each individual patient. Subsequently, APACHE II has become the most commonly used and authoritative scoring system in ICUs. With the development of NICU, the application of APACHE II in patients with critical neurological diseases has gradually increased (20). Moon et al. reported a significant correlation between APACHE II scores and mortality in ICU-admitted acute stroke patients (16). Rordorf et al. analyzed 63 ischemic stroke patients who were admitted to ICU and identified that APACHE II scores were a key predictor of death (19). In the present study, we found that APACHE II scores were a strong predictor of 28-day mortality among anterior circulation LVOS patients admitted to the NICU after EVT, with high discrimination and good calibration. Moreover, each 1-point increase in APACHE II score elevated 28-day mortality odds by 23.9%. These results address the research gap of ascertaining the use of APACHE II scores to predict post-EVT mortality in LVOS patients managed in NICU.

Currently, there is no unified critical APACHE II score for predicting mortality in ischemic stroke. In our study, the optimum threshold was 16.5 points, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and specificity of 86.2%. Patients with APACHE II scores <16.5 had a 28-day mortality rate of 1.8%, whereas those scoring ≥16.5 had a rate of 50.0%. These results partially align with Rordorf et al.’s findings, which proposed a cutoff of 18 points (19). Similar to their study, no deaths occurred in patient with scores <9 points. However, their reported mortality rate for scores ≥9 (43%) was higher than our observed rate (23.2%). This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in patient demographics or treatment protocols. Notably, in this study, patients with APACHE II scores ≥16.5 had a 19.46-fold increased risk of 28-day mortality post-EVT compared to patients with scores <16.5. This cutoff effectively stratified high-risk patients. Importantly, concurrent cerebral hernia in patient with scores ≥16.5 further escalated mortality risk.

Our study demonstrated that APACHE II scores effectively predicted 28-day mortality in NICU-admitted anterior circulation LVOS patients post-EVT. We recognize the following advantages: (i) The APS incorporates GCS, a validated predictor of post-EVT survival in ischemic stroke (23). Consistent with this, our death group showed significantly lower GCS scores at baseline and 24-h. (ii) In addition to GCS, the APS includes 11 physiological parameters. Among these, abnormal blood pressure, leukocytosis, and fever caused by infection, have been reported to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patient (2426). (iii) The APACHE II scoring system comprises age and pre-existing heart failure, which have been shown to predict post-EVT mortality (27, 28). In the present study, patients in the death group were significantly older, had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels.

However, the APACHE II has several limitations: (i) No indicative parameter for evaluating the severity of neurological impairment such as NIHSS, an international well-validated scale, is available. This is particularly critical as both previous studies and our current data consistently demonstrate significantly higher 24-h NIHSS scores in the death group (5). We therefore propose combining APACHE II with 24-h NIHSS to improve prediction accuracy. (ii) The score fails to account for lesion location-specific prognostic differences (29). (iii) APACHE II captures the worst values within the first 24 h of ICU admission, potentially overlooking dynamic prognostic changes. However, recent evidence has suggested serial assessments at multiple time points may improve predictive accuracy (30).

5 Limitations

The study lacked data on stroke etiology, pre-EVT intravenous thrombolysis administration, door-to-puncture time, puncture to recanalization time, and the EVT procedural details. These variables have impacts on mortality. And, our reported mortality rates may have been affected by early care withdrawal decisions, including hospice transfer or mechanical ventilation discontinuation within 28 days of NICU admission. These limitations underscore the need for future multicenter, prospective studies with longer follow-up periods.

6 Conclusion

Anterior circulation LVOS is associated with a high 28-day mortality rate of 20.4% following EVT. Age, history of atrial fibrillation, level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, 24-h NIHSS, baseline GCS and 24-h GCS, cerebral hernia complication, and hemorrhagic transformation are factors influencing mortality. The APACHE II scoring system effectively predicts 28-day mortality, with an optimal cutoff score of 16.5 points. We recommend combining the APACHE II score with the 24-h NIHSS and cerebral hernia for improved prognostic stratification. These findings will be helpful for the clinical evaluation of stroke patients, identification of patients who are at high risk of death, and improvement of doctor-patient communication and medical decision-making, especially in clinical settings.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Xiangyang Central Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because this retrospective study was approved by an ethics review board.

Author contributions

WQ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. CX: Writing – original draft, Data curation. JY: Writing – original draft, Data curation. MH: Data curation, Writing – original draft. LC: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. YZ: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by 2022 Science and Technology Project of Xiangyang Science and Technology Bureau (2022YL16A), and 2022 Science and Technology Project of Xiangyang Central Hospital (2022YB16).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System; APS, Acute physiology score; ASPECTS, Alberta Stroke Project Early Computed Tomography Score; AUC, Area under the curve; CHS, Chronic health score; CT, Computed tomography; CTA, Computed tomography angiography; DSA, Digital subtraction angiography; EVT, Endovascular treatment; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; LVOS, Large vessel occlusion stroke; NICU, Neurology intensive care unit; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.

References

1. Yarbrough, CK, Ong, CJ, Beyer, AB, Lipsey, K, and Derdeyn, CP. Endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. (2015) 46:3177–83. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009847

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Goyal, M, Menon, BK, van Zwam, WH, Dippel, DWJ, Mitchell, PJ, Demchuk, AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Raza, SA, and Rangaraju, S. Prognostic scores for large vessel occlusion strokes. Neurology. (2021) 97:S79–90. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012797

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Raza, SA, Barreira, CM, Rodrigues, GM, Frankel, MR, Haussen, DC, Nogueira, RG, et al. Prognostic importance of CT ASPECTS and CT perfusion measures of infarction in anterior emergent large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:670–4. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Rangaraju, S, Frankel, M, and Jovin, TG. Prognostic value of the 24-hour neurological examination in anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a post hoc analysis of two randomized controlled stroke trials. Interv Neurol. (2016) 4:120–9. doi: 10.1159/000443801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Chiu, AH, Hince, DA, and McAuliffe, W. Glasgow coma scale on presentation predicts outcome in endovascular treatment for acute posterior large-vessel occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2020) 41:645–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6497

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Rangaraju, S, Haussen, D, Nogueira, RG, Nahab, F, and Frankel, M. Comparison of 3-month stroke disability and quality of life across modified Rankin scale categories. Interv Neurol. (2017) 6:36–41. doi: 10.1159/000452634

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Marto, JP, Strambo, D, Ntaios, G, Nguyen, TN, Herzig, R, Czlonkowska, A, et al. Safety and outcome of revascularization treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and COVID-19: the global COVID-19 stroke registry. Neurology. (2023) 100:e739–50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Westendorp, WF, Dames, C, Nederkoorn, PJ, and Meisel, A. Immunodepression, infections, and functional outcome in ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2022) 53:1438–48. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038867

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, and Zimmerman, JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. (1985) 13:818–29. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mumtaz, H, Ejaz, MK, Tayyab, M, Vohra, LI, Sapkota, S, Hasan, M, et al. APACHE scoring as an indicator of mortality rate in ICU patients: a cohort study. Ann Med Surg. (2023) 85:416–21. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000264

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mederos, MA, Reber, HA, and Girgis, MD. Acute pancreatitis: a review. JAMA. (2021) 325:382–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Morkar, DN, Dwivedi, M, and Patil, P. Comparative study of sofa, Apache II, Saps II, as a predictor of mortality in patients of sepsis admitted in medical ICU. J Assoc Physicians India. (2022) 70:11–2.

Google Scholar

14. Aslar, AK, Kuzu, MA, Elhan, AH, Tanik, A, and Hengirmen, S. Admission lactate level and the APACHE II score are the most useful predictors of prognosis following torso trauma. Injury. (2004) 35:746–52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Li, QX, Zhao, XJ, Fan, HY, Li, XN, Wang, DL, Wang, XJ, et al. Application values of six scoring systems in the prognosis of stroke patients. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:1416. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01416

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Moon, BH, Park, SK, Jang, DK, Jang, KS, Kim, JT, and Han, YM. Use of APACHE II and SAPS II to predict mortality for hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients. J Clin Neurosci. (2015) 22:111–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Weingarten, S, Bolus, R, Riedinger, MS, Maldonado, L, Stein, S, and Ellrodt, AG. The principle of parsimony: Glasgow coma scale score predicts mortality as well as the APACHE II score for stroke patients. Stroke. (1990) 21:1280–2. doi: 10.1161/01.str.21.9.1280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li, QX, Zhao, XJ, Peng, YB, Wang, DL, Dong, XL, Fan, HY, et al. A prospective study of comparing the application of two generation scoring Systems in Patients with acute cerebral infarction. Adv Ther. (2019) 36:3071–8. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01084-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rordorf, G, Koroshetz, W, Efird, JT, and Cramer, SC. Predictors of mortality in stroke patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. (2000) 28:1301–5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200005000-00007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bian, Y, Zhang, P, Xiong, Y, Xu, F, Zhu, S, Tang, Z, et al. Application of the APACHE II score to assess the condition of patients with critical neurological diseases. Acta Neurol Belg. (2015) 115:651–6. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0420-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Powers, WJ, Rabinstein, AA, Ackerson, T, Adeoye, OM, Bambakidis, NC, Becker, K, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2019) 50:e344–418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hacke, W, Kaste, M, Bluhmki, E, Brozman, M, Dávalos, A, Guidetti, D, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. (2008) 359:1317–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Raseta, M, Bazarova, A, Wright, H, Parrott, A, and Nayak, S. A novel toolkit for the prediction of clinical outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy. Clin Radiol. (2020) 75:795.e15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Samuels, N, van de Graaf, RA, Mulder, MJHL, Brown, S, Roozenbeek, B, van Doormaal, P, et al. Admission systolic blood pressure and effect of endovascular treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. (2023) 22:312–9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00076-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Huber, T, Kleine, JF, Kaesmacher, J, Bette, S, Poppert, H, Zimmer, C, et al. Blood leukocytes as prognostic parameter in stroke thrombectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 42:32–40. doi: 10.1159/000444369

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Jiang, X, Hu, Y, Wang, J, Ma, M, Bao, J, Fang, J, et al. Outcomes and risk factors for infection after endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2024) 30:e14753. doi: 10.1111/cns.14753

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chandra, RV, Leslie-Mazwi, TM, Oh, DC, Chaudhry, ZA, Mehta, BP, Rost, NS, et al. Elderly patients are at higher risk for poor outcomes after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke. (2012) 43:2356–61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.650713

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Gentile, L, Pracucci, G, Saia, V, Falcou, A, Biraschi, F, Zini, A, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with heart failure: the Italian registry of endovascular treatment in acute stroke. Neurol Sci. (2023) 44:3577–85. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06830-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Rangaraju, S, Streib, C, Aghaebrahim, A, Jadhav, A, Frankel, M, and Jovin, TG. Relationship between lesion topology and clinical outcome in anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Stroke. (2015) 46:1787–92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009908

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cheng, Y, Chen, Q, Wu, S, Zhu, R, and Wu, C. Impact and predictive value of time-dependent acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score on death risk in patients with severe stroke: data analysis based on MIMIC-III. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. (2021) 33:1237–42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210409-00533

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: APACHE II, large vessel occlusion stroke, endovascular treatment, intensive care unit, mortality

Citation: Qin W, Xiao C, Yang J, Hu M, Chang L and Zhu Y (2025) Predicting 28-day mortality for patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke following endovascular treatment in neurology intensive care units. Front. Neurol. 16:1630773. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630773

Received: 18 May 2025; Accepted: 06 August 2025;
Published: 20 August 2025.

Edited by:

Irene Scala, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Murat Mert Atmaca, University of Health Sciences, Türkiye
Pier Andrea Rizzo, Università cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Italy

Copyright © 2025 Qin, Xiao, Yang, Hu, Chang and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yanhan Zhu, MzM3MTQ4MzQ2QHFxLmNvbQ==; Liying Chang, bGl5aW5nX2NoYW5neGZAMTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.