Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Endovascular and Interventional Neurology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1637268

This article is part of the Research TopicDistal, Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Epidemiology, Diagnostics, Treatment Options, and Outcome PredictionView all 4 articles

Medication Adherence Trajectory and its Impact on Recurrent Stroke after Carotid Artery Stenting

Provisionally accepted
Shou-hong  LinShou-hong Lin1,2Mei-ling  YangMei-ling Yang1,2Fei-fei  LiuFei-fei Liu2Yi  ZengYi Zeng1,2Ting-Ting  WuTing-Ting Wu1,2*
  • 1First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Medication adherence is critical for patient outcomes, but remains insufficiently investigated in individuals following Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). This study aims to investigate the trajectories and determinants of medication adherence and their impact on stroke recurrence in post-CAS patients. Methods: This study included patients who underwent CAS in the neurology department of a tertiary Grade A hospital in Fujian Province from January 2021 to May 2024. Medication adherence was assessed using the Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) at 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge, Stroke recurrence was evaluated at each follow-up visit. Group-Based Trajectory Modeling (GBTM) was utilized to analyze adherence trajectories, and logistic regression identified associated factors. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess the impact of adherence trajectories on stroke recurrence. Three Cox models were constructed: Model 1 (unadjusted), Model 2 (adjusted for age and sex), and Model 3 (further adjusted for significant variables from univariate analysis). Results: Medication adherence scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were 6.33±1.43, 5.06±1.31, and 4.81±1.47, respectively. Three distinct adherence trajectories were identified: high level decline (37.32%), medium level decline (31.58%), and persistently low level decline (31.10%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that household income, family medication supervision, regular follow-up visits, and medication related-beliefs significantly influenced these trajectories (P<0.05). The 12-month stroke recurrence rate was 9.57%. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in stroke recurrence among the three trajectory groups (Log-rank and Breslow test, both P<0.001). In Models 1 and 2, high level decline was associated with significantly lower recurrence risk compared with persistently low level decline (P<0.05), but this association was not significant in Model 3 (P>0.05). Conclusion: Post-CAS patients demonstrate three distinct medication adherence trajectories, with socioeconomic, behavioral, and belief-related factors influencing long-term adherence. The high level decline group serves as a crucial protective factor in preventing stroke recurrence. underscoring the need for targeted interventions to maintain adherence and prevent recurrent stroke.

Keywords: Carotid artery stenting, Medication Adherence, group-based trajectory model, Stroke recurrence, kaplan-meier curves

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lin, Yang, Liu, Zeng and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ting-Ting Wu, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.