Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Stroke

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1637606

This article is part of the Research TopicBridging The Gap of Unmet Need in Stroke Care in Developing CountriesView all 17 articles

Risk prediction models for discharge disposition in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Chaoran  XuChaoran Xu1Lijun  XiangLijun Xiang1Yansi  LuoYansi Luo1Li  HeLi He1Liwen  TaiLiwen Tai1Yaman  LiuYaman Liu1Kaixin  HeKaixin He1Min  DuMin Du2*Xiaomei  ZhangXiaomei Zhang1*
  • 1Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Nursing Department, Guangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Aims Multivariate prediction models can be used to estimate the risk of discharged stroke patients needing a higher level of care.To determine the model's performance, a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis were performed. Methods This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP), SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase were searched from inception to September 30, 2024. Multiple reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool(PROBAST) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. All statistical analyses were conducted in Stata 17.0. Results A total of 4059 studies were retrieved, and after the selection process,14 studies included 22 models were included in this review.The incidence of non-home discharge in stroke patients ranged from 15% to 84.9%.The most frequently used predictors were age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score at admission,the Functional Independence Measure(FIM) cognitive function score, and the FIM motor function score.The reported area under the curve(AUC) ranged from 0.75 to 0.95.Quality appraisal was performed. All studies were found to have a high risk of bias, mainly attributable to unsuitable data sources and inadequate reporting of the analytical domain. All statistical analyses were conducted in Stata 17.0.In the meta-analysis, the area under the curve(AUC) value for the five validation models was 0.80 (95%CI [0.75– 0.86]). Conclusion Research on risk prediction models for stroke patient discharge disposition is still in its initial stages, with a high overall risk of bias and a lack of clinical application, but the model has good predictive performance.Future research should focus on developing highly interpretive, high-performance, easy-to-use machine learning models, enhancing external validation, and driving clinical applications. Registration PROSPERO: CRD42024576996.

Keywords: Stroke, Patient Discharge, Disposition, Risk factors, Systematic review, Meta-analysis

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Xiang, Luo, He, Tai, Liu, He, Du and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Min Du, 13928726832@139.com
Xiaomei Zhang, zhangxm322@smu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.