ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Applied Neuroimaging
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1637835
Real-world brain volumetry in multiple sclerosis: importance of methodological consistency and clinical relevance of gray matter atrophy
Provisionally accepted- 1Department Biomedische Wetenschappen, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- 2Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center for Neurosciences, NEUR and/or AIMS Research Groups, Brussels, Belgium
- 3Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Department of Neurology, Brussels, Belgium
- 4Nationaal Multipele Sclerose Centrum, Melsbroek, Belgium
- 5Universiteit Antwerpen Departement Biomedische Wetenschappen, Antwerp, Belgium
- 6Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Klinische biologie, Brussels, Belgium
- 7Department of Neurobiology, Center for Alzheimer Research, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 8Icometrix NV, Leuven, Belgium
- 9Department of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Brain volume loss (BVL) is a marker of neurodegeneration associated with clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, its application in routine clinical practice is limited due to measurement errors introduced by the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners across and within centers. Objective: To confirm the existence and clinical relevance of longitudinal BVL in a real-world MS cohort with scanner variability, employing a dedicated quantification pipeline combined with post-acquisition harmonization. Methods: We analyzed MRI data from 72 MS patients scanned across multiple Belgian centers over 48-60 months. Clinical disability was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Percentage volume change (PVC) in whole brain (WB), total gray matter (TGM), cortical gray matter (CGM), and deep gray matter was quantified using the icobrain ms pipeline. A similarity index was applied to account for scanner differences. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers served as controls. Results: No significant differences in annualized PVC were observed between MS patients and controls. Within the MS group, 9HPT performance correlated with TGM (ρ = -0.30, P = 0.017) and CGM (ρ = -0.31, P = 0.015) volume loss. Modified MS Functional Composite scores correlated with WB (R = 0.28, P = 0.03), TGM (ρ = 0.31, P = 0.014), and CGM (ρ = 0.31, P = 0.013) volume loss and could be independently predicted by these measures. Conclusion: Using automated brain volumetry with post-acquisition harmonization to address scanner variability, we did not detect accelerated BVL in this real-world MS cohort compared to healthy individuals. Nonetheless, GM volume loss was found to be clinically relevant in MS.
Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, Brain volume loss, gray matter, Real-world, Disability progression
Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Temmerman, Vanremoortel, Bjerke, D'Hooghe, Nagels, Pauwels, Sima, Smeets, Van Schependom, Wittens, Engelborghs and D'haeseleer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Miguel D'haeseleer, miguel.dhaeseleer@mscenter.be
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.