Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 22 August 2025

Sec. Stroke

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1639880

This article is part of the Research TopicFutile recanalization after successful thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, including incomplete microvascular reperfusionView all 3 articles

Reperfusion failure after successful thrombectomy of large vessel occlusion stroke: clinical and imaging evidence

M. Barbagallo,
M. Barbagallo1,2*M. Zahn,M. Zahn1,2J. Zimmermann,J. Zimmermann1,3R. Klvekorn,R. Klövekorn1,2J. Held,J. Held1,2B. Nemeth,B. Nemeth4,5B. Reolon,B. Reolon2,6J. Bellomo,J. Bellomo2,7A. SchwarzA. Schwarz8J. M. VeerbeekJ. M. Veerbeek9C. H. B. Van Niftrik,C. H. B. Van Niftrik2,7M. Sebk,M. Sebök2,7M. Piccirelli,M. Piccirelli2,6L. Michels,L. Michels2,6A. R. Luft,,A. R. Luft1,2,10Z. Kulcsar,Z. Kulcsar2,6L. Regli,L. Regli2,7G. Esposito,G. Esposito2,7J. Fierstra,J. Fierstra2,7P. Thurner,P. Thurner2,6T. Schubert,T. Schubert2,6S. Wegener,S. Wegener1,2
  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3Lake Lucerne Institute, Vitznau, Switzerland
  • 4Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin Universität Wien, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 5Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 6Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 7Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 8Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • 9Clinic for Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, University Teaching and Research Hospital of the University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
  • 10Cereneo Center for Neurology and Rehabilitation, Vitznau, Switzerland

Introduction: Reperfusion failure (RF) describes a condition in which patients suffering a large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke present insufficient tissue reperfusion and recovery despite optimal mechanical thrombectomy (MT) results. Approximately 50% of patients suffering from LVO are affected. Our current understanding of the underlying pathomechanisms is limited and mostly based on rodent models. The goal of this study was to further characterize RF by applying advanced multimodal hemodynamic imaging in stroke patients.

Methods: Patients from the IMPreST study with LVO stroke and successful recanalization [corresponding to thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia grade (TICI) 2b-3] were included. Follow-ups with blood oxygenation-level dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) and non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) imaging were performed (<72 h, 7 days and 90 days). Demographic and clinical data (NIHSS and mRS) were collected.

Results: Of the 49 patients included in IMPreST, 18 patients met the inclusion criteria. Based on the perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) of the affected area compared to the contralateral side after MT, patients were stratified into three groups: hypoperfusion (n = 3), normalization (n = 8), and hyperperfusion (n = 7). The hyperperfusion group tended to show poorest clinical outcome (mRS 3 months: 2.5 [Q1–Q3 2.0–3.0] vs. normalization: 1 [Q1–Q3 0.75–3.0], p = 0.169) and had significantly lower BOLD-CVR values at visit one and two compared to hypoperfusion and normalization groups, indicating impaired cerebrovascular reactivity (visit1 hyperperfusion group −0.01 [Q1–Q3–0.02 – 0.07], normalization group 0.12 [0.09, 0.19], hypoperfusion group, 0.09 [0.09, 0.11] p = 0.049, visit2 hyperperfusion group 0.07 [Q1–Q3 0.03–0.10], normalization group 0.17 [0.16, 0.18], hypoperfusion group 0.10 [0.09, 0.11], p = 0.014).

Discussion: We found three patterns of reperfusion after successful MT of LVO stroke: normalization, hypo- and hyperperfusion of the ischemic area on days at < 72 h after stroke. There was substantial inhomogeneity in perfusion and clinical outcomes between the three groups. Next to poorest clinical outcome, the hyperperfusion-group showed poorest cerebrovascular reserve, reflecting findings of RF in rodent models. Thus, we suggest that RF includes both hypo- as well as hyperperfusion. Early detection using advanced imaging would allow a better identification of patients at risk for poor clinical outcome.

Clinical trial registration: http://clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier (NCT04035746).

1 Introduction

Stroke is a major global health burden, representing the third-leading cause of death and disability combined worldwide (1). Despite continuous improvements in the treatment of large vessel occlusion strokes (LVO) including mechanical thrombectomy (MT) (2), there is still a substantial number of patients with insufficient clinical recovery despite optimal recanalization therapy. This phenomenon is known as futile recanalization and likely due to “reperfusion failure” (RF), i.e., inadequate brain tissue reperfusion despite recanalization, and affects more than 50% of patients with LVO and restored circulation, fulfilling the criteria for thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) of 2b-3 after MT (35).

The mechanisms underlying RF are not clarified yet. Currently, studies indicate that dysfunctional vascular regulation might play a key role (6, 7). Based on observations in rodent models, different components have been described: first, at a macrovascular level, a malfunction in the vascular contractility with consecutive constriction and rigidity of the large vessels and/or capillaries (8). Second, at a microvascular level, intraluminal occlusion provoked by distal embolization of dissolved clots and development of micro-clots or stalls with neutrophils (7, 9, 10).

While the suggested mechanisms of RF are primarily based on observations from rodent stroke models, knowledge confirming the concept in stroke patients with LVO is limited. In a study with patients suffering from LVO, presenting within 4.5 h after onset, about 25% of patients with recanalization result TICI 2c-3 presented regions of persistent hypoperfusion on cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps within the infarct region on post-CT or MRI perfusion imaging (11). This was associated with a higher rate of hemorrhagic transformation, larger infarct growth and worse clinical outcome, along with worse national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) at 24 h and modified Ranking score (mRS) at 90 days after onset. Similarly, a systematic review confirmed that about a third of patients with macrovascular reperfusion showed signs of microvascular impairment, resulting in a reduced rate of functional independence. However, it remains unclear whether the phenomenon is merely an epiphenomenon of the infarcted parenchyma or if it contributes to further infarction (12).

Considering the large number of affected patients, a better characterization of RF is needed in order to derive targeted approaches for normalizing reperfusion and improving outcome after stroke treatments.

In this study, we used advanced multimodal hemodynamic imaging to describe different patterns of RF in patients with LVO stroke after MT, allowing a comprehensive view on the macro- and microvascular perfusion in affected patients.

2 Materials and methods

This study was conducted as a sub-analysis of the interplay of microcirculation and plasticity after ischemic stroke (IMPreST) trial. IMPreST (clinicaltrials.gov, No. NCT04035746) is a prospective, longitudinal, and observational cohort study, with the goal to illuminate the interplay between the microcirculation and clinical outcomes after LVO stroke based on serial perfusion and hemodynamic imaging studies and to better understand the plasticity of brain tissue after stroke. Data was collected between October 2018 and March 2022 at the University hospital of Zurich, Switzerland. The study was approved by the ethics commission of the canton of Zurich, Switzerland (Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, KEK-ZH-NR. 2019–00750). The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964.

2.1 Patient selection and consent to participate

Within the IMPreST study, patients presenting an acute first-ever hemispheric LVO and undergoing triage for an endovascular acute stroke treatment were eligible. Inclusion criteria were: 72 h first clinical ischemic stroke at hospital admission, occlusion of a M1/M2-segment of the middle cerebral artery and/or intracranial internal carotid artery, perfusion deficits with cortical involvement, 18 years of age or above, living independent before stroke (corresponding to a mRS of ≤ 3), written informed consent of the patient or a documented authorization of an independent doctor, not involved in the study, or a post-hoc written informed consent of the patient or next of kin. Exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, contraindication to MRI, and presence of major neurological, psychiatric, or medical comorbidities (such as major cardiac, psychiatric and/or neurological diseases, early seizures, known or suspected non-compliance, drug and/or alcohol abuse, contra-indications for MRI). For this sub-analysis, only patients fulfilling the criteria of TICI of 2b-3 after MT with available perfusion studies at onset and <72 h after onset were considered.

2.2 Image acquisition

The imaging data included a pre-interventional CT or MRI scan within 24 h after clinical onset. The CT perfusion was performed respecting the standard-of-care protocols at the University Hospital Zurich. The modalities diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI were acquired post-MT. Follow-up scans were performed <72 h (visit one), 7 days (+/− 2 days; visit two) and 90 days (+/− 14 days; visit three) after onset using a 3-Tesla Skyra MRI scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany).

Within the MRI protocol, the T1 magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE), followed a repetition and echo time (TR/TE) OF 2200/5.14 ms, slice thickness of 1 mm, voxel size 1x1x1 mm3, flip angle 8°, field of view of 230 mm. The DWI included 2D EPI sequence, TR/TE of 2500/75 ms, flip angle by 90°, slice thickness of 4.5 mm, voxel size with 1.5 × 1.5 × 4.5 mm3, b-values of 0 and 1000s/mm2. For the MR PWI the following protocol was applied: TR/TE of 2040/36 ms, flip angle of 90°, slice thickness of 4 mm, voxel size 1.7 × 1.7 × 4.0 mm3, FOV of 220 mm. Other MRI sequences were acquired as part of the established imaging protocol. These were not included in the analysis for this study.

For the acquisition of the blood oxygenation-level dependent cerebrovascular reactivity (BOLD-CVR) MRI sequences, standardized CO2 impulse was applied by RespirAct™ (Thornhill Research Institute, Toronto, Canada), allowing targeted CO2 end-tidal pressure (PetCO2) while maintaining iso-oxic O2 level (13). The used CO2 protocol in our institute followed a 100 s phase of patient specific resting PetCO2, whereafter the PetCO2 was increased by 10 mmHg for the duration of 80s, after which it returned to the resting PetCO2 for 120 s.

In the case of contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging, Dotarem Gadoteric acid (Gadoterate meglumine) from Guerbet, Villepinte, France, was administered intravenously with a dosage of 0.2 mL/kg body weight at a flow of 5 mL/s. Thereafter, a saline flush between 25 and 30 mL was applied to ensure full circulation of the contrast agent.

2.3 Image processing

Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) included a cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV) and a time-to-maximum (Tmax) analyses calculated applying RAPID® software (14). Based on the perfusion parameter maps post MT, patients were categorized qualitatively by three authors (MB, MZ and SW) into three different reperfusion groups (normalized, hypo-, and hyperperfusion).

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated applying Bayesian estimation with the RAPID® software.

For the BOLD-CVR imaging processing we followed the previously described Zurich analysis pipeline (15) using MATLAB2019 (The MathWorks, Inc., Natrick, United States) and SPM12 (Welcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London). The BOLD-CVR were calculated voxel-per-voxel as percentage of BOLD signal change, divided by the absolute change in PetCO2 (% ΔBOLD/mmHg).

2.4 Clinical characteristics

Clinical characteristics such as age, sex, vascular risk factors, time-to-recanalization, location of the occlusion, application of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), NIHSS on admission, 24 h and 3 months after onset and mRS at admission, 36 h and 3 months after onset were collected and analyzed.

2.5 Categorization of perfusion group

Based on the colored map of the Tmax, CBF and CBV parameters at visit one (<24 h after onset), the patients were categorized into one of the following groups: hyperperfusion, if Tmax was shorter and CBF and CBV higher compared to the contralateral hemisphere; hypoperfusion, if Tmax was longer and CBF and CBV lower compared to the contralateral hemisphere; normalized, if Tmax, CBF and CBV were comparable to the contralateral side. The comparison of the perfusion parameters was focused on the region within the infarct and the penumbra region. The selection was performed by three authors (MB, MZ, SW). Discrepancies in the selection process were resolved through discussion.

2.6 Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to compare the demographics, clinical patterns, therapeutic modalities and advanced perfusion study parameters between the perfusion groups. Ordinal, non-dichotomous variables are presented as median and quartiles one and three (Q1–Q3). Categorical dichotomous and non-dichotomous variables are presented as percentages. Assuming a nonnormal distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis-Test was applied to compare the variables. We defined the level of significance as the probability for a type I error of less than 5%, corresponding to a p-value of <0.05.

All statistical analysis were performed in R, version 4.3.0.

3 Results

Of the 49 patients enrolled within the IMPreST study, we identified 19 patients fulfilling the criteria of TICI 2b-3 after MT. 18 patients had available pre- and postinterventional PWI and were included in the analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating patient inclusion in the IMPreST trial. Out of 49 patients, 30 achieved recanalization TICI 2b-3. From these, 19 had successful recanalization, with one exclusion due to incomplete perfusion studies. Thus, 18 patients had successful recanalization with available pre- and post-MT perfusion imaging.

Figure 1. Overview of patient selection: Of the 49 patients enrolled in the IMPreST study, 19 achieved recanalization equivalent to TICI 2b 3. Additionally, 18 patients provided complete pre- and post-MT perfusion studies. MT, Mechanical Thrombectomy; TICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction.

Considering the post-MT PWI, the patients showed three different patterns of reperfusion after MT: Eight patients had a normalized perfusion, in which the CBF, CBV and Tmax values were similar to the non-affected contralateral hemisphere (see Figure 2). Three patients had diminished perfusion parameters compared to the contralateral hemisphere (see Figure 3) and were categorized into the “hypoperfusion” group. Finally, seven patients showed increased perfusion compared to the contralateral side, thus representing the “hyperperfusion” group (see Figure 4). In addition, the perfusion curves showed diminished values after Visit one in the case of the hyperperfusion group, while they stayed comparable or increased slightly in the other two groups (compare Figures 24).

Figure 2
Colored brain imaging scans showing different metrics: Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF), Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV), Tmax, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD), and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR). Rows represent baseline and three visits. Each set includes perfusion curves. Color scales and units are indicated below each metric.

Figure 2. Perfusion pattern “normalized”. In this perfusion group, patients showed after MT similar CBF, CBV and Tmax values in both hemispheres. In addition, perfusion studies including BOLD-CVR, DWI and FLAIR modalities are shown. Finally, perfusion curves show the change in contrast agent over time, where the red line indicates the AIF, the blue line the VOF and the green line the average bolus in tissue (no V3 available). In this group, no perfusion dynamics could be observed. The FLAIR hyperintense signal showed the final lesion volume (indicated by the red arrow). Visit 1 was performed <72 hours, Visit 2 7 ± 2 days, and Visit 3 90 ± 14 days after onset. AIF: Arterial Input Fraction, BOLD-CVR: Blood Oxygenation-Level dependent Cerebrovascular Reactivity, CBF: Cerebral Blood Flow, CBV: Cerebral Blood Volume, DWI: Diffusion Weighted Imaging, FLAIR: Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery, MT: Mechanical Thrombectomy, Tmax: Time-to-Maximum, VOF: Venous Output Function.

Figure 3
Brain imaging scans comparing different modalities: CBF, CBV, Tmax, DWI, BOLD, and FLAIR, across three stages: Baseline, V1, V2, and V3. The images show color variations indicating different measurements, with arrows pointing to specific areas in CBF and CBV images at V1. Perfusion curves are displayed on the right, showing scan time data for each stage. Scales and units are provided at the bottom.

Figure 3. Perfusion pattern “hypoperfusion“: In this perfusion group, patients exhibited after MT a persistently diminished perfusion of the affected side based on CBF, CBV and Tmax values. The difference compared to the contralateral side is pronounced. In addition, perfusion studies including BOLD-CVR (no Visit 3 available), DWI and FLAIR modalities are shown. Finally, perfusion curves show the change in contrast agent over time, where the red line indicates the AIF, the blue line the VOF and the green line the average bolus in tissue. The BOLD-CVR showed persistently slightly diminished values. DWI and FLAIR modalities indicated the persistently compromised brain tissue, reflected in the second largest lesion size of the cohort. The hypoperfused area in Visit 1 on the CBV and CBF maps is indicated by red arrows. Visit 1 was performed <72 hours, Visit 2 7 ± 2 days, and Visit 3 90 ± 14 days after onset. AIF: Arterial Input Fraction, BOLD-CVR: Blood Oxygenation-Level dependent Cerebrovascular Reactivity, CBF: Cerebral Blood Flow, CBV: Cerebral Blood Volume, DWI: Diffusion Weighted Imaging, FLAIR: Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery, MT: Mechanical Thrombectomy, Tmax: Time-to-Maximum VOF: Venous Output Function.

Figure 4
Medical imaging panel showing brain scans across four visits, labeled Baseline, Visit 1, Visit 2, and Visit 3. Each row displays images in columns for CBF, CBV, Tmax, DWI, BOLD, FLAIR, and perfusion curves. Scales and units are provided at the bottom. Arrows highlight differences in certain areas during Visit 1. Perfusion curves depict graphs with peaks in flow rates.

Figure 4. Perfusion pattern “hyperperfusion“: In this perfusion group, patients exhibited after MT an increased perfusion of the affected side at the first follow-up. The hyperperfused area in Visit 1 on the CBV, CBF and Tmax maps is indicated by red arrows. The CBF, CBV and Tmax values continuously decreased in the follow-ups. In addition, perfusion studies including BOLD-CVR, DWI and FLAIR modalities are shown. Finally, perfusion curves show the change in contrast agent over time, where the red line indicates the AIF, the blue line the VOF and the green line the average bolus in tissue. The BOLD-CVR showed persistently diminished values. DWI and FLAIR indicated the largest lesion size of the cohort. Visit 1 was performed <72 hours, Visit 2 7 ± 2 days, and Visit 3 90 ± 14 days after onset. AIF: Arterial Input Fraction, BOLD-CVR: Blood Oxygenation-Level dependent Cerebrovascular Reactivity, CBF: Cerebral Blood Flow, CBV: Cerebral Blood Volume, DWI: Diffusion Weighted Imaging, FLAIR: Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery, MT: Mechanical Thrombectomy, Tmax: Time-to-Maximum VOF: Venous Output Function.

The demographical and clinical characteristics, as well as the treatment modalities of all patients are summarized in Tables 1, 2. The group with the normalized perfusion pattern showed in tendency youngest median age (67.0 [Q1–Q3 40.5–76.25], vs. hypoperfusion group 68.0 [Q1–Q3 67.5–70.0], vs. hyperperfusion group 72.0 [Q1–Q3 67.5–79.5], p = 0.689). The hypoperfusion group showed a tendency for the longest time-to-recanalization (708 min [Q1–Q3 485.5–751.5], p = 0.398), and lowest NIHSS on admission (11.0 [Q1–Q3 9.0–13.5], p = 0.697). We observed a tendency for higher age, shortest time-to-recanalization (260.5 min [Q1–Q3 211.0–340.5], p = 0.398), highest NIHSS on admission (16.0 [Q1–Q3 11.5–18.0], o = 0.697), smallest difference in NIHSS score after 24 h (3.0 [Q1–Q3 3.0–6.0], p = 0.818) and after 3 months from onset (0.5 [Q1–Q3 0.0–3.0], p = 0.891) for the hyperperfusion group. In NOVA, considering the quotient of the flow of the affected side divided by the unaffected side at the M1-segment, the highest quotients were reached by the hyperperfusion, and lowest by the hypoperfusion group (1.09 [Q1–Q3 0.94–1.27] vs. 0.77 [Q1–Q3 0.94–1.27], see Table 3).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Patient demographic and clinical parameters.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Data on treatment modalities and results from angiography.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. BOLD-CVR, NOVA parameters and level of collaterals subdivided by perfusion group.

In the follow-up PWI studies, the groups with the normalized perfusion after MT (Figure 2) retained their normalized perfusion pattern over all follow-ups. Similarly, for the hypoperfusion group (Figure 3), we observed a persistent circumscribed hypoperfused area without detectable changes in any follow-up. There was no case with later reperfusion. In contrast, the hyperperfusion group showed a tendency to develop a hypoperfusion in the initially affected hyperperfused area between visit two and three (7 days (+/− 2 days) and 90 days (+/− 14 days), see Figure 3), with respective decreased CBF, CBV and increased Tmax values.

The final infarct volume was estimated by quantifying lesion volume from the fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) at visit 3. A tendency for the largest infarct volumes were found in the hyperperfusion group, followed by the hypoperfusion group and the normalized group (35,278 cm3 [Q1–Q3 10,989–61,143], 11,276 cm3 [Q1–Q3 10,352–28,460 cm3] and 4,456.6 cm3 [Q1–Q3 1,493–12,660 cm3], respectively, p = 0.353, see Table 2). Also, we saw a tendency for a better collateral status for the “normalized” group, while this was the poorest for the hyperperfusion group (good status in normalized group for 6 (75%) patients, vs. 2 (33%) in hyperperfusion group, p = 0.657).

In Table 3 we summarized the results of the advanced perfusion studies with BOLD-CVR and NOVA. Within the BOLD-CVR analysis, we observed the highest values in the normalized group for the affected medial cerebral artery (MCA) region, while lower and even negative values were observed at visit one for the hyperperfusion group (0.12 [Q1–Q3 0.09–0.19] vs. − 0.01 [Q1–Q3–0.02-0.07], p = 0.049).

4 Discussion

There is an urgent need to better understand RF after treatment of LVO stroke, in order to enhance available therapeutic options. In this study, we investigated the phenomenon of RF in patients with LVO after successful MT by applying advanced imaging techniques at different time points before and after MT, including PWI, BOLD-CVR and NOVA. Qualitatively, we distinguished between three different reperfusion patterns in the affected stroke area after successful MT: hypo-, hyper-, and normalized perfusion. This qualitative subdivision was quantitatively reflected by the NOVA-analysis, where highest quotients were reached in the hyperperfusion, and lowest in the hypoperfusion group. Repeated PWI studies showed “static” patterns for the hypo- and normalized perfusion cohort, meaning that perfusion remained either normal or below the contralateral side (hypoperfusion) between visits 1 and 3 (up to day 90). However, in the hyperperfusion cohort, we observed a transformation of the hyperperfused infarct area into a hypoperfusion pattern up to visit three. In line with this, we observed that both, the hypo- and hyperperfusion cohorts, tended to have worse clinical outcomes compared to the group with normalized perfusion. Collateral-status, time-to-recanalization, and door-to-groin appeared to be associated with certain post-MT perfusion patterns, even though this did not reach statistical significance, most likely due to the very small patient groups. In this regard, the hyperperfusion group showed a tendency for the worst collateral status and shortest time-to-recanalization, while the hypoperfusion group had the second worst collateral status and the longest time-to-recanalization. Strikingly, the duration of the MT-procedure was significantly shorter in the hyperperfusion group, compared to the other groups.

4.1 Normalized perfusion cohort

Normalized perfusion after successful MT correlates with a favorable clinical outcome (14). This cohort presented accordingly a trend for the lowest mRS score in the 3 months follow up. Collateral status tended to be better and final infarct volume to be smaller. As potential confounders, younger age, more distal artery occlusions, and lower NIHSS at onset were found on average in this group of patients. This favorable clinical and radiological outcome is consistent with the results of previous studies (16, 17).

4.2 Hypoperfusion cohort

Patients presenting with hypoperfusion post-MT showed a tendency toward the second-worst clinical outcome. They also had the longest time-to-recanalization. Accordingly, in previous studies, RF was mostly linked to persistent hypoperfusion associated with longer onset-to-arrival and time-to-recanalization (11, 1820). Additionally, the duration of the MT was significantly longer in patients with hypoperfusion, potentially indicating difficult interventons with increased likelihood of residual vessel obstructions or fragment embolism. In accordance with Ng et al., we also observed the highest rate for hemorrhagic transformation in this group (11). In our cohort, this was the group with most patients receiving IVT treatment.

This group also displayed a trend for poor leptomeningeal collaterals compared to the normalized group, which was previously suggested to be associated with RF (21) and generally perceived as an independent predictor for poor clinical outcome (3, 22).

4.3 Hyperperfusion cohort

As one key finding of our study, we found a tendency for the least clinical improvement and poorest clinical outcome within the hyperperfusion group. This cohort also presented a trend for the worst collateral status, largest infarct volumes, and, interestingly, shortest MT-duration and time-to-recanalization. In general, these three perfusion patterns have been previously described solely after thrombolysis, therefore not exclusively in patients with LVO after MT and only within a frame of 24 h after treatment (23). The poor clinical outcome and clinical recovery could be attributed to higher age, more proximally affected vessels, along with higher baseline NIHSS, and larger infarct volumes. We also observed the smallest difference in NIHSS 24 h after onset in this group, even though none of these values reached statistical significance. These findings are in accordance with Shimonaga et al.’s (19). Potreck et al. came to an opposite conclusion: their hyperperfusion cohort showed a similar outcome compared with their normalized perfusion cohort. This difference could be explained by the different assessment time points of our studies. While their study cohorts were evaluated based on perfusion patterns obtained within 24 h after successful recanalization, our analysis is based on perfusion data acquired within 3 days post-recanalization and includes follow-up until day 90. Their hyperperfusion cohort included patients with temporary hyperperfusion, with a potential to normalization within 18–36 h after MT (17). However, we observed that hyperperfusion post-MT resulted in a long-term hypoperfusion, which was associated with poor clinical outcome, and indicating that any post-MT perfusion alterations may be associated with a worse clinical outcome (11, 24, 25). Therefore, this study suggests that hypo- and hyperperfusion should both be perceived as RF, indicating a poor clinical outcome. In this regard, Lin et al. have shown the importance of post-MT PWI imaging to recognize hyperperfusion and its consequences (26). Our results emphasize the importance of advanced imaging up to 3 months post-MT since hypoperfusion, as a sign of RF, might appear also after such a latency. Accordingly, identifying patients with greater risk for poor outcome could be enabled by advanced imaging.

In our study, hyperperfusion was not significantly correlated with shorter onset-to-recanalization, indicating that merely reducing time-to-recanalization does not prevent RF. Similarly, Shimonaga et al. could not find a significant difference, even though they described a tendency toward a longer time to recanalization (19).

4.4 Pathophysiology of RF and possible therapeutic implementations

As shown in rodent models, leptomeningeal collaterals are crucial for the survival of at-risk-tissue (27). Preclinical data suggest that fast, overshooting reperfusion after recanalization in stroke is linked to poor leptomeningeal collaterals and reperfusion injury (28), which was also reflected in our patients with altered perfusion patterns. To this regard, the reperfusion injury describes a damage occurring at the vascular level due to reperfusion. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood yet. One of the most accepted theories proposes that following a vessel occlusion, endothelial damage at the level of the smooth muscle cells may lead to an impaired autoregulation and thus to an increased rigidity of the cerebral vessels. As a consequence, alteration of the cerebral perfusion pressure may favor increased blood–brain barrier permeability, thus favoring hemorrhagic transformation (26, 29). Also, increased vessel rigidity and a damaged endothelium, to which a thrombus might attach with greater difficulty, could explain the shorter duration of MT in the hyperperfusion group. Another theory suggests a damaging effect of free radicals during hypoxic phases, leading to altered endothelium function, vasodilatation, and in a later phase to pericyte contraction, and increased blood–brain-barrier permeability (8, 26), which also possibly could reflect the changes in the perfusion studies in our hyperperfusion group between visit one and three. A relevant role could play the reactive hyperemia, in which a phase of cerebral ischemia is followed by a transient increase in perfusion due to autoregulatory mechanisms. This phenomenon has been associated with both favorable prognostic implications (30) and adverse outcome (31) However, this does not explain the long-term differences observed at Visit two and three. Similarly, the so-called luxury perfusion, which frequently appears after restored blood-supply, may explain a perfusion alteration in the subacute phase of a stroke or after MT respectively, but not the persistent changes in the affected area (3234).

In addition, due to mechanical stress, MT itself may lead to additional damage of the endothelium of the vessel wall (35). Damaged endothelium activates thrombocytes and potentially triggers an immune response involving neutrophils, leucocytes, and monocytes (7, 10, 35, 36), and therefore leading to a malfunction of autoregulation.

In accordance with some other studies, our dataset shows an increased rate of hemorrhagic transformation in the hyperperfusion cohort (19, 29, 3741). Additionally, our study underlines poor clinical outcome in this group. Hypoperfusion in the affected area at visit three followed the initial hyperperfusion. To the best of our knowledge, this tendency has not been described before and emphasizes the risk of hyperperfusion post-MT.

As mentioned above, patients exhibiting hypoperfusion may have experienced residual distal vessel occlusion due to distal embolization. In such cases, a timely repeated attempt with MT and/or local application of thrombolysis could be beneficial. Given the not specified pathophysiology of the phenomenon, it is not possible to implement a clear therapeutic strategy in the case of the hyperperfusion group.

Also, some therapeutic agents have been tested in rodent models, to counteract some proposed mechanism responsible for the reperfusion failure. Therefore, Yang et al. tested an agent called NA-1 which successfully inhibited ischemia-induced pericyte constriction (42). Regarding the neutrophilic stalls, El Amki et al. successfully applied anti-Ly6G-antibodies in rodent models, which hindered the adhesion of neutrophils, preventing perfusion disturbances in recanalized vessels (7), thus providing a proof-of-concept for new therapeutic strategies.

4.5 Advanced perfusion studies

BOLD-CVR displayed significant differences between the reperfusion groups, thus proving a suitable and sensitive tool for impaired cerebral reperfusion. Both, hypo- and hyperperfusion post-MT correlated with a reduced cerebrovascular reserve in BOLD-CVR imaging. Using the same data set, another analysis suggested poor clinical outcome 3 months post intervention in patients with impaired BOLD-CVR (43). Therefore, BOLD-CVR might be useful as an early-stage predictor of reperfusion failure and poor clinical outcomes post-MT (27, 44).

4.6 Strengths and limitations

In this study, we used advanced hemodynamic imaging techniques to identify three different post-MT perfusion patterns in patients with LVO over a period of 3 months. Previous studies focused on either hyperperfusion (19, 26, 29) or hypoperfusion (11, 45) without comparing them, and only applied advanced imaging shortly after stroke (11, 19, 26, 27, 29, 45). Thus, we were able to unveil the course of tissue reperfusion after MT, particularly finding that initial hyperperfusion was followed by hypoperfusion and accompanied by reduced CVR.

However, our study has several limitations. One important limitation is the small number of patients, impeding proper statistical analysis. The small number resulted from a relatively high rate of withdrawal during the acute enrolment phase, as well as from frequently incomplete datasets, either due to missing perfusion studies prior to MT or the complexity of certain acquisitions, such as BOLD-CVR, which requires active patient participation. Furthermore, we only analyzed patients fulfilling the criteria for a successful MT (TICI 2b-3), in order to study RF after successful recanalization, which however, next to the non-randomized nature of the cohort, limits generalization of findings to other patients. While we performed a qualitive analysis of post-MT perfusion using perfusion imaging, further studies could include additional quantitative perfusion analysis of the interested areas.

5 Conclusion

In patients with LVO stroke, both, hypo- and hyperperfusion after successful MT potentially indicate poor clinical outcome. Thus, not only hypo-, but also hyperperfusion should be considered as a manifestation of RF. Good collaterals are associated with healthy reperfusion and favorable outcome. BOLD-CVR could be used after MT to anticipate a RF and to better estimate prognosis in patients after MT. Further studies may further illuminate the pathophysiological mechanisms behind this phenomenon.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, upon reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich, KEK-ZH-NR. 2019–00750. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

MB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RK: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JH: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BN: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. BR: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JV: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CN: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GE: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the UZH Clinical Research Priority Program (CRPP) Stroke and the Swiss national science foundation (SNSF 310030_200703).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the Neuroradiology staff, the teams from Neurology and Neurosurgery, as well as the patients for their valuable contributions to the realization of this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with the author SW.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Virani, SS, Alonso, A, and Aparicio, HJAmerican Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2021) 143:e254–743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Evans, MRB, White, P, Cowley, P, and Werring, DJ. Revolution in acute ischaemic stroke care: a practical guide to mechanical thrombectomy. Pract Neurol. (2017) 17:252–65. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2017-001685

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Espinosa De Rueda, M, Parrilla, G, Manzano-Fernández, S, García-Villalba, B, Zamarro, J, Hernández-Fernández, F, et al. Combined multimodal computed tomography score correlates with futile recanalization after Thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. (2015) 46:2517–22. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008598

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Goyal, M, Menon, BK, and van Zwam, WHHERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Hussein, HM, Georgiadis, AL, Vazquez, G, Miley, JT, Memon, MZ, Mohammad, YM, et al. Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2010) 31:454–8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Granger, DN, and Kvietys, PR. Reperfusion therapy-what’s with the obstructed, leaky and broken capillaries? Pathophysiology. (2017) 24:213–28. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2017.09.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. El Amki, M, Glück, C, Binder, N, Middleham, W, Wyss, MT, Weiss, T, et al. Neutrophils obstructing brain capillaries are a major cause of no-reflow in ischemic stroke. Cell Rep. (2020) 33:108260. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108260

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yemisci, M, Gursoy-Ozdemir, Y, Vural, A, Can, A, Topalkara, K, and Dalkara, T. Pericyte contraction induced by oxidative-nitrative stress impairs capillary reflow despite successful opening of an occluded cerebral artery. Nat Med. (2009) 15:1031–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.2022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Knowland, D, Arac, A, Sekiguchi, KJ, Hsu, M, Lutz, SE, Perrino, J, et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron. (2014) 82:603–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Erdener, ŞE, Tang, J, Kılıç, K, Postnov, D, Giblin, JT, Kura, S, et al. Dynamic capillary stalls in reperfused ischemic penumbra contribute to injury: a hyperacute role for neutrophils in persistent traffic jams. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2021) 41:236–52. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20914179

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Ng, FC, Churilov, L, Yassi, N, Kleinig, TJ, Thijs, V, Wu, T, et al. Prevalence and significance of impaired microvascular tissue reperfusion despite macrovascular angiographic reperfusion (no-reflow). Neurology. (2022) 98:e790–801. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013210

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mujanovic, A, Ng, F, Meinel, TR, Dobrocky, T, Piechowiak, EI, Kurmann, CC, et al. No-reflow phenomenon in stroke patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical data. Int J Stroke. (2023) 19:58–67. doi: 10.1177/17474930231180434

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Slessarev, M, Han, J, Mardimae, A, Prisman, E, Preiss, D, Volgyesi, G, et al. Prospective targeting and control of end-tidal CO2 and O2 concentrations. J Physiol. (2007) 581:1207–19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Straka, M, Albers, GW, and Bammer, R. Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2010) 32:1024–37. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van Niftrik, CHB, Piccirelli, M, Bozinov, O, Pangalu, A, Fisher, JA, Valavanis, A, et al. Iterative analysis of cerebrovascular reactivity dynamic response by temporal decomposition. Brain Behav. (2017) 7:e00705. doi: 10.1002/brb3.705

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Brugnara, G, Herweh, C, Neuberger, U, Bo Hansen, M, Ulfert, C, Mahmutoglu, MA, et al. Dynamics of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation parameters following endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. (2022) 14:7163. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017163

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Potreck, A, Mutke, MA, Weyland, CS, Pfaff, JAR, Ringleb, PA, Mundiyanapurath, S, et al. Combined perfusion and permeability imaging reveals different pathophysiologic tissue responses after successful thrombectomy. Transl Stroke Res. (2021) 12:799–807. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00885-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. El Amki, M, and Wegener, S. Improving cerebral blood flow after arterial recanalization: a novel therapeutic strategy in stroke. Int J Mol Sci. (2017) 18:19. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122669

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shimonaga, K, Matsushige, T, Hosogai, M, Hashimoto, Y, Mizoue, T, Ono, C, et al. Hyperperfusion after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2019) 28:1212–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Shahid, AH, Abbasi, M, Larco, JLA, Madhani, SI, Liu, Y, Brinjikji, W, et al. Risk factors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment in patients with large-vessel occlusion: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. (2022) 2:1–9. doi: 10.1161/svin.121.000257

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Liu, S, Luo, Y, Wang, C, Tang, R, Sheng, Z, Xie, W, et al. Combination of plaque characteristics, Pial collaterals, and hypertension contributes to misery perfusion in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. (2020) 51:195–204. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26778

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kimmel, ER, Al Kasab, S, Harvey, JB, Bathla, G, Ortega-Gutierrez, S, Toth, G, et al. Absence of collaterals is associated with larger infarct volume and worse outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion and mild symptoms. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2019) 28:1987–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rosso, C, Belkacem, S, Amor-Sahli, M, Clarençon, F, Leger, A, Baronnet, F, et al. Persistent perfusion abnormalities at day 1 correspond to different clinical trajectories after stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. (2023) 15:e26. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018953

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Tamura, Akira MD, Asano, Takao MD, Sano, Keiji MD. Correlation between rCBF and histological changes following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke (1980) 11:487–493.

Google Scholar

25. Tudor, T, Spinazzi, EF, Alexander, JE, Mandigo, GK, Lavine, SD, Grinband, J, et al. Progressive microvascular failure in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and time-course analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2024) 44:192–208. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231216766

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lin, YH, and Liu, HM. Update on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. J Neurointerv Surg. (2020) 12:788–93. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015621

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Binder, Felizitas, Amki, MEl, Glück, C, and Middleham, W, Leptomeningeal collaterals regulate reperfusion in ischemic stroke and rescue the brain from futile recanalization. (2023) 112:1456–1472. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.25.529915

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Binder, NF, El Amki, M, Glück, C, Middleham, W, Reuss, AM, Bertolo, A, et al. Leptomeningeal collaterals regulate reperfusion in ischemic stroke and rescue the brain from futile recanalization. Neuron. (2024) 112:1456–1472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Yu, S, Liebeskind, DS, Dua, S, Wilhalme, H, Elashoff, D, Qiao, XJ, et al. Postischemic hyperperfusion on arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI is linked to hemorrhagic transformation in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2015) 35:630–7. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lin, Y-H, Tang, S-C, Chen, C-H, Lee, C-W, Lu, C-J, Tsai, L-K, et al. Angiographic early hyperemia in the middle cerebral artery territory after thrombectomy is associated with favorable clinical outcome in anterior circulation stroke. Eur Radiol. (2021) 31:5281–8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07578-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Luby, M, Hsia, AW, Lomahan, CA, Davis, R, Burton, S, Kim, Y, et al. Post-ischemic hyperemia following endovascular therapy for acute stroke is associated with lesion growth. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2023) 43:856–68. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231155222

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Morelli, N, Morelli, J, Rota, E, Michieletti, E, and Guidetti, D. CT perfusion mismatch in subacute stroke: Oligemia or luxury perfusion? Response to persistent benign Oligemia causes CT perfusion mismatch in patients with intracranial large artery occlusive disease during subacute stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2013) 19:914–5. doi: 10.1111/cns.12184

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wintermark, M, Flanders, AE, Velthuis, B, Meuli, R, van Leeuwen, M, Goldsher, D, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra. Stroke. (2006) 37:979–85. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000209238.61459.39

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Nicolas-Jilwan, M, and Wintermark, M. Automated brain perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke: interpretation pearls and pitfalls. Stroke. (2021) 52:3728–38. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Nie, X, Leng, X, Miao, Z, Fisher, M, and Liu, L. Clinically ineffective reperfusion after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2023) 54:873–81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038466

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Rayasam, A, Hsu, M, Kijak, JA, Kissel, L, Hernandez, G, Sandor, M, et al. Immune responses in stroke: how the immune system contributes to damage and healing after stroke and how this knowledge could be translated to better cures? Immunology. (2018) 154:363–76. doi: 10.1111/imm.12918

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Okazaki, S, Yamagami, H, Yoshimoto, T, Morita, Y, Yamamoto, H, Toyoda, K, et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI after reperfusion therapy is related to hemorrhagic transformation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2017) 37:3087–90. doi: 10.1177/0271678X17718099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ogasawara, K, Sakai, N, and Kuroiwa, T. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective review of 4494 patients. J Neurosurg. (2007) 107:1130–6. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/12/1130

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Endo, H, Ishikawa, K, Nomura, R, Yamaguchi, D, Shindo, K, Oka, K, et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for medium vessel occlusion: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. (2024) 19:1771–5. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.01.087

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kaku, Y, Yoshimura, S-I, and Kokuzawa, J. Factors predictive of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid angioplasty and stent placement. American Journal of Neuroradiology (AJNR). (2004). 25:1403–1408.

Google Scholar

41. Maas, MB, Kwolek, CJ, Hirsch, JA, Jaff, MR, and Rordorf, GA. Clinical risk predictors for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2013) 84:569–72. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303659

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yang, X, Zhao, J, Tian, H, Nie, X, Zheng, L, Liu, X, et al. Impact of NA-1 on pericyte-driven vasoconstriction and its role in no-reflow during cerebral ischemia–reperfusion. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2025) 31:e70409. doi: 10.1111/cns.70409

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bellomo, J, Sebök, M, Stumpo, V, van Niftrik, CHB, Meisterhans, D, Piccirelli, M, et al. Blood oxygenation level–dependent cerebrovascular reactivity–derived steal phenomenon may indicate tissue reperfusion failure after successful endovascular thrombectomy. Transl Stroke Res. (2023) 16:207–16. doi: 10.1007/s12975-023-01203-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sebök, M, Lohaus, N, Esposito, G, and Winklhofer, S. Leptomeningeal collateral activation indicates severely impaired cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with symptomatic unilateral carotid artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2021) 41:3039–51. doi: 10.1177/0271678X211024373

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mujanovic, A, Kurmann, CC, Manhart, M, Piechowiak, EI, Pilgram-Pastor, SM, Serrallach, BL, et al. Value of immediate flat panel perfusion imaging after endovascular therapy (AFTERMATH): a proof of concept study. Am J Neuroradiol. (2024) 45:163–70. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Glossary

ADC - Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

BOLD-CVR - Blood Oxygenation-Level dependent Cerebrovascular Reactivity

CBF - Cerebral Blood Flow

CBV - Cerebral Blood Volume

DWI - Diffusion Weighted Imaging

FLAIR - Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery

IMPreST - Interplay of Microcirculation and Plasticity after ischemic STroke

IVT - IntraVenous Thrombolysis

LVO - Large Vessel Occlusion

MCA - Medial Cerebral Artery

mRS - modified Ranking Score

MT - Mechanical Thrombectomy

MTT - Mean Transit Time

MPRAGE - T1 Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo

NIHSS - National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

PWI - Perfusion Weighted Imaging

Q1–Q3 - Quartiles 1 and 3

RF - Reperfusion Failure

TR/TE - Repetition and Echo Time

TICI - Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction

Tmax - Time-to-Maximum

TTP - Time-To-Peak

Keywords: reperfusion failure, futile recanalization, stroke, perfusion study, stroke thrombectomy

Citation: Barbagallo M, Zahn M, Zimmermann J, Klövekorn R, Held J, Nemeth B, Reolon B, Bellomo J, Schwarz A, Veerbeek JM, Van Niftrik CHB, Sebök M, Piccirelli M, Michels L, Luft AR, Kulcsar Z, Regli L, Esposito G, Fierstra J, Thurner P, Schubert T and Wegener S (2025) Reperfusion failure after successful thrombectomy of large vessel occlusion stroke: clinical and imaging evidence. Front. Neurol. 16:1639880. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1639880

Received: 02 June 2025; Accepted: 31 July 2025;
Published: 22 August 2025.

Edited by:

Adnan Mujanovic, University Hospital Bern Inselspital, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Marieta Peycheva, Plovdiv Medical University, Bulgaria
Mohammed Salman Shazeeb, University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2025 Barbagallo, Zahn, Zimmermann, Klövekorn, Held, Nemeth, Reolon, Bellomo, Schwarz, Veerbeek, Van Niftrik, Sebök, Piccirelli, Michels, Luft, Kulcsar, Regli, Esposito, Fierstra, Thurner, Schubert and Wegener. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: M. Barbagallo, bWFzc2ltby5iYXJiYWdhbGxvQHVzei5jaA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.